Search

Purpose: Assessment of breast cancer (BC) pattern in individual states with respect to ethnicity., Methods: Population-based cancer registries from the Cancer Incidence in Five Continents databases (1998-2007) supplemented with Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data from 2008 to 2010 were used., Results: The age-specific burden showed a clear convergence of BC burden among African American (AA) and Caucasian American (CA) in most states. This was primarily because of a decrease in the BC rate among CA aged 50 years or older and an increase among AA of the same age group. The 2003-2007/1998-2002 rate ratio for CA was 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-0.91) in the South, whereas it was 1.06 (95% CI, 1.04-1.08) for AA. This convergence was confirmed in states with available data for the period 2008 to 2010. The AA/CA rate ratio among women aged younger than 40 years was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99-1.04) in the Northeast, 1.29 (95% CI, 1.25-1.33) in the South, and 1.10 (95% CI, 1.04-1.17) in the West. This pattern correlates with the estrogen receptor positive and progesterone receptor positive pattern. The strongest disparity in estrogen receptor negative was observed in Louisiana which with Detroit, have had the highest rates of estrogen receptor negative., Conclusions: The changes in postmenopausal hormone use and mammography screening might have played a role in the observed convergence., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Context: Ten years after BRCA1 and BRCA2 were first identified as major breast cancer susceptibility genes, the spectrum of mutations and modifiers of risk among many ethnic minorities remain undefined., Objectives: To characterize the clinical predictors, spectrum, and frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in an ethnically diverse high-risk clinic population and to evaluate the performance of the BRCAPRO statistical model in predicting the likelihood of a mutation., Design, Setting, and Participants: Comparative analysis of families (white, Ashkenazi Jewish, African American, Hispanic, Asian) with 2 or more cases of breast and/or ovarian cancer among first- and second-degree relatives. Families were identified at US sites between February 1992 and May 2003; in each family, the individual with the highest probability of being a mutation carrier was tested., Main Outcome Measures: Frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the BRCAPRO model., Results: The mutation spectrum was vastly different between families of African and European ancestry. Compared with non-Hispanic, non-Jewish whites, African Americans had a lower rate of deleterious BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations but a higher rate of sequence variations (27.9% vs 46.2% and 44.2% vs 11.5%; P<.001 for overall comparison). Deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were highest for Ashkenazi Jewish families (69.0%). Early age at diagnosis of breast cancer and number of first- and second-degree relatives with breast and ovarian cancer were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. In discriminating between mutation carriers, BRCAPRO performed as well in African American families as it did in white and Jewish families, with an area under the curve of 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.88) for African American families and 0.70 (95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.79) for white and Jewish families combined., Conclusions: These data support the use of BRCAPRO and genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in the management of high-risk African American families. Irrespective of ancestry, early age at diagnosis and a family history of breast and ovarian cancer are the most powerful predictors of mutation status and should be used to guide clinical decision making.