Search

Aim: To compare secondary systemic treatment (SST) continuation and associated resource use and costs in chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) patients in the USA.  Materials & methods : This was a retrospective study using Truven Health MarketScan database (2009-2016). cGvHD patients were classified as continuers or discontinuers if treated with SST for ≥180 days without or with a treatment gap (≥45 days), respectively. Results: Among 464 cGvHD patients with SST, mTOR inhibitors, extracorporeal photopheresis and imatinib were most frequently used. A total of 172 patients were SST continuers and 292 were discontinuers. Extracorporeal photopheresis treated patients were the highest continuers, followed by imatinib and mTOR inhibitors. SST continuers had lower monthly hospitalization costs versus discontinuers. Conclusion: This real-world analysis demonstrates high SST continuation rates in cGvHD patients are associated with lower resource utilization and cost.

Purpose: The contribution of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) to healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has not been extensively investigated. The objective of this study was to estimate both inpatient and outpatient HCRU and costs associated with acute GVHD during the 100-day and 1-year periods after allogeneic HCT in the USA., Methods: A retrospective analysis of administrative claims from the Optum® Research Database of patients aged ≥ 12 years who received HCT between 2010 and 2016 was conducted. Costs and HCRU among patients with acute GVHD and no GVHD were compared during the 100-day (acute GVHD, n = 723; no GVHD, n = 385) and 360-day (acute GVHD, n = 445; no GVHD, n = 227) periods after HCT., Results: Patients with acute GVHD had significantly more (P < 0.001) mean office visits (47 vs 32), hospital outpatient visits (71 vs 35), and inpatient stays (2.8 vs 1.1) than patients with no GVHD during 360 days post-HCT; similar findings were observed over the 100-day period. Mean total all-cause costs were significantly higher (P < 0.001) for patients with acute GVHD versus no GVHD during both post-HCT periods (100-day, $316,458 vs $215,229; 360-day, $466,720 vs $263,568). Additional factors associated with increased 360-day costs included young age (12-17 years; P < 0.001) and peripheral blood as graft source (P = 0.03)., Conclusion: Acute GVHD was associated with significant HCRU and costs in the first 100 days of transplant, increasing over the first year post-HCT. Inpatient care was the primary driver, but outpatient care and related costs were also increased.

Background: A second allogeneic transplantation after a prior allogeneic (allo-allo) or autologous (auto-allo) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is usually performed for graft failure, disease recurrence, secondary malignancy, and, as planned, auto-allo transplantation for some diseases., Methods: We sought to describe the costs of second allogeneic HCT and evaluate their relationship with patient characteristics and posttransplantation complications. Clinical information and medical costs for the first 100 days after transplantation of 245 patients (allo-allo, 55; auto-allo, 190) who underwent a second HCT between 2004 and 2010 were collected., Results: Median costs of the second allogeneic HCT were U.S. $151,000 (range, U.S. $62,000-405,000) for the allo-allo group and U.S. $109,000 (range, U.S. $26,000-490,000) for the auto-allo group. Median length of hospital stay was 23 days (range, 0-76) for the allo-allo group and 9 days (range, 0-96) for the auto-allo group. Only the year of transplantation and posttransplantation complications were significantly associated with costs in both groups when both pre- and posttransplantation variables were considered. The overall costs of the second HCT were higher than the first in the allo-allo group. For the auto-allo group, there was no difference between the costs whether preformed as a planned tandem or as salvage for relapse., Conclusions: Our results suggest that second allogeneic HCT is costly, particularly if it follows a prior allogeneic transplantation, and is driven by the costs of complications.