Search

Purpose: Two randomized trials published in 2001 provided level 1 evidence for the use of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CyNx) for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, the regulatory approval of vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKI) in 2005 has left an “evidence void” regarding the use of CyNx. We evaluated the patterns in the use of CyNx in the cytokine and VEGFR-TKI eras, and the patient characteristics associated with the use of CyNx. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry was used to identify patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IV RCC between 2001 and 2008. Patients were classified as treated during the cytokine (2001–2005) or VEGFR-TKI (2006–2008) eras. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate the odds of undergoing CyNx according to treatment era and socioeconomic characteristics. Results: Overall, 1,112 of 2,448 patients (45 %) underwent CyNx. CyNx use remained stable between 2001 and 2005 (50 %), but decreased to 38 % in 2008. Logistic regression analysis revealed that older age (OR 0.82, 95 % CI: 0.68, 0.99), black race (OR 0.64, 95 % CI: 0.46, 0.91), Hispanic ethnicity (OR 0.71, 95 % CI: 0.54, 0.93), and treatment in the VEGFR-TKI era (OR 0.82, 95 % CI: 0.68, 0.99) were independently associated with decreased use of CyNx. Conclusions: Use of CyNx in the United States has declined in the VEGFR-TKI era. Older patients and minorities are less likely to receive CyNx. Results of ongoing phase III trials are needed to refine the role of this treatment modality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The issue of "un-Americanism" was present at the creation of the gay rights movement. Indeed the movement emerged, at least in part, as a response to wide-ranging discriminatory policies and practices that were implemented by the federal government during the Cold War. Faced with claims that they constituted an existential threat to the United States, activists in the early gay rights movement worked hard to a firm their patriotism and appealed frequently to the nation's founding ideals of liberty and equality. At times, they also characterized those who discriminated against them as "un-American." Fifty years later, debates about "Americanism" and "un-Americanism" have been centre stage in the battle to repeal Don't Ask, Don't Tell and to secure gay marriage rights. With conservative politicians, commentators and activists claiming that demands for gay marriage threaten the foundation of American civilization, the gay rights movement and its supporters have responded in kind. The increased willingness of gay rights activists to lay the charge of "un-American" is, at one level, a logical extension of the appeal to Americanism that has long been central to the movement's rhetorical and symbolic approach. But it also reflects both the greater empowerment of today's LGBT community compared with their McCarthy-era predecessors and the divisiveness of contemporary American political culture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The incidental detection of early-stage kidney tumors is increasing in the United States. Nephron-sparing approaches (NS) to managing these tumors are equivalent to radical nephrectomy (RN) in oncologic outcomes and have a decreased impact on renal function. Our objective was to evaluate trends in the use of NS over the past decade and the socioeconomic factors associated with its use. Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients with stage I kidney cancer between 2000 and 2008. Patients were classified by the type of surgery as NS (local destruction and local excision) or RN. Patients were further categorized by age, race, insurance status, and income. Log-binomial regression was used to estimate prevalence ratios (PR) for the proportion of NS to RN according to demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. Results: From 2000 to 2008, there were 142,194 cases of kidney cancer reported to the NCDB. In these cases, 43,034 (30.3 %) patients had NS, and 86,431 (60.78 %) patients had RN. The prevalence of NS increased 10 % per year (PR = 1.10, p < 0.0001)-from 20.0 % in 2000 to 45.1 % in 2008. Older age, lower income, Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, and lack of health insurance were associated with a decreased prevalence of NS. Conclusions: NS as a treatment for stage I kidney cancer has increased steadily since 2000. Age, racial, and socioeconomic differences may exist in the utilization of NS. Additional analyses, with patient level data, are required to address the independent significance of these variables in an effort to develop strategies to mitigate these potential disparities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We describe the safety of sipuleucel-T using an integrated analysis of 4 randomized, controlled studies in patients with prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Adverse events, survival data and laboratory evaluations were examined for common, rare and latent events. Results: In 5% or more of sipuleucel-T cases some adverse events were reported at a rate at least twice that in controls, including chills in 53.1%, pyrexia in 31.3%, headache in 18.1%, myalgia in 11.8%, influenza-like illness in 9.7% and hyperhidrosis in 5.0%. These events generally occurred within 1 day of infusion, were grade 1 or 2 in severity and resolved in 2 days or less. The incidence of serious adverse events reported was 24.0% in sipuleucel-T cases and 25.1% in controls. Grade 3 or greater adverse events were reported within 1 day of infusion in 40 of 601 sipuleucel-T cases (6.7%) and 7 of 303 controls (2.3%). The incidence rate of reported cerebrovascular events was 3.5% for sipuleucel-T cases and 2.6% in controls. Conclusions: Sipuleucel-T therapy in patients with prostate cancer has a side effect profile that is characterized by mild to moderate, short-term, reversible adverse events. There was no evidence of a treatment related increase in autoimmune complications or secondary malignancies after treatment with sipuleucel-T. Sipuleucel-T can be administered safely in the outpatient setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the history of the gay rights movement in the U.S. The civil rights movement in the U.S. during the 1960s and the participation of Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. is described to show the link between political demonstrations and Americanism. The growth of the gay rights movement in the 1950s and the homophile movement and the organization of the Mattachine Society in 1953 is described. Other topics include the East Coast Homophile Organizations (ECHO), patriotism in the U.S., political dissent, the riot at the Stonewall Inn in New York City, the Gay Liberation Front (GLF) organization, and the San Francisco politician Harvey Milk, who was an activist for gay rights.

Background: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer affecting men in the United States. Management options for localized disease exist, yet an evidence-based criterion standard for treatment still has to emerge. Although 5-year survival rates approach 98%, all treatment options carry the possibility for significant side effects, such as erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence. It is therefore recommended that patients be actively involved in the treatment decision process. We have developed an Internet/CD-ROM-based multimedia Prostate Interactive Educational System (PIES) to enhance patients' treatment decision making. PIES virtually mirrors a health center to provide patients with information about prostate cancer and its treatment through an intuitive interface, using videos, animations, graphics, and texts. Objectives: (1) To examine the acceptability and feasibility of the PIES intervention and to report preliminary outcomes of the program in a pilot trial among patients with a new prostate cancer diagnosis, and (2) to explore the potential impact of tailoring PIES treatment information to participants' information-seeking styles on study outcomes. Methods: Participants (n = 72) were patients with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer who had not made a treatment decision. Patients were randomly assigned to 3 experimental conditions: (1) control condition (providing information through standard National Cancer Institute brochures; 26%), and PIES (2) with tailoring (43%) and (3) without tailoring to a patient's information-seeking style (31%). Questionnaires were administrated before (t1) and immediately after the intervention (t2). Measurements include evaluation and acceptability of the PIES intervention, monitoring/blunting information-seeking style, psychological distress, and decision-related variables (eg, decisional confidence, feeling informed about prostate cancer and treatment, and treatment preference). Results: The PIES program was well accepted by patients and did not interfere with the clinical routine. About 79% of eligible patients (72/91) completed the pre- and post-PIES intervention assessments. Patients in the PIES groups compared with those in the control condition were significantly more likely to report higher levels of confidence in their treatment choices, higher levels of helpfulness of the information they received in making a treatment decision, and that the information they received was emotionally reassuring. Patients in the PIES groups compared with those in the control condition were significantly less likely to need more information about treatment options, were less anxious about their treatment choices, and thought the information they received was clear (P < .05). Tailoring PIES information to information-seeking style was not related to decision-making variables. Conclusions: This pilot study confirms that the implementation of PIES within a clinical practice is feasible and acceptable to patients with a recent diagnosis of prostate cancer. PIES improved key decision-making process variables and reduced the emotional impact of a difficult medical decision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Few studies have investigated prostate cancer patients' experiences of cognitive functioning or neurobehavioral symptoms (i.e., behavioral changes associated with neurological dysfunction) following androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Methods Semi-structured interviews conducted from the US by phone and in-person were used to explore and characterize the: 1) experience of cognitive and neurobehavioral functioning in non-metastatic prostate cancer patients undergoing ADT ( n = 19) compared with patients who had not undergone ADT ( n = 20); 2) perceived causes of cognitive and neurobehavioral symptoms; 3) impact of these symptoms on quality of life; and 4) strategies used to cope with or compensate for these symptoms. Neuropsychological performance was assessed to characterize the sample. Results Overall, ADT patients experienced marginally more cognitive problems than non-ADT (nADT) patients even though there were no significant differences between groups in neuropsychological performance. ADT patients also experienced more declines in prospective memory and multi-tasking than nADT patients. Significant proportions of participants in both groups also experienced retrospective memory, attention and concentration, and information processing difficulties. With respect to neurobehavioral symptoms, more ADT patients experienced emotional lability and impulsivity (both aspects of disinhibition) than nADT patients. Among the causes to which participants attributed declines, both groups attributed them primarily to aging. A majority of ADT patients also attributed declines to ADT. For both groups, increased cognitive and neurobehavioral symptoms negatively impacted quality of life, and most participants developed strategies to ameliorate these problems. Conclusion ADT patients are more vulnerable to experiencing specific cognitive and neurobehavioral symptoms than nADT patients. This study highlights the importance of capturing: a) cognitive symptoms not easily detected using neuropsychological tests; b) neurobehavioral symptoms that can be confused with psychological symptoms, and c) causal beliefs that may affect how people cope with these symptoms. Effective interventions are needed to assist prostate cancer patients in managing these symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The number and diversity of cancer therapeutics in the pipeline has increased over the past decade due to an enhanced understanding of cancer biology and the identification of novel therapeutic targets. At the same time, the cost of bringing new drugs to market and the regulatory burdens associated with clinical drug development have progressively increased. The finite number of eligible patients and limited financial resources available to evaluate promising new therapeutics represent rate-limiting factors in the effort to translate preclinical discoveries into the next generation of standard therapeutic approaches. Optimal use of resources requires understanding and ultimately addressing inefficiencies in the cancer clinical trials system. Prior analyses have demonstrated that a large proportion of trials initiated by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cooperative Group system are never completed. While NCI Cooperative Group trials are important, they represent only a small proportion of all cancer clinical trials performed. Herein, we explore the problem of cancer clinical trials that fail to complete within the broader cancer clinical trials enterprise. Among 7776 phase II-III adult cancer clinical trials initiated between 2005-2011, we found a seven-year cumulative incidence of failure to complete of approximately 20% (95% confidence interval = 18% to 22%). Nearly 48000 patients were enrolled in trials that failed to complete. These trials likely contribute little to the scientific knowledge base, divert resources and patients from answering other critical questions, and represent a barrier to progress., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)