Search

Purpose To compare higher order aberrations (HOAs) in normal eyes between a Scheimpflug imaging system (Pentacam HR) and dual Scheimpflug–Placido imaging system (Galilei G4). Setting Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, and the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA. Design Retrospective case series. Methods Eyes screened for refractive surgery were evaluated sequentially using a Scheimpflug device and a dual Scheimpflug–Placido device. Differences, correlations, and agreement between values for total root mean square (RMS), trefoil, coma, and spherical aberration were analyzed, and Bland-Altman plots were generated. Results One hundred five eyes of 105 patients (44 men, 61 women) were evaluated. Total RMS, coma, and trefoil were significantly different between groups (all P <.001), while spherical aberration values were not. There was moderate correlation between devices for trefoil (r = 0.475 to 0.652), coma (r = 0.574 to 0.651), and spherical aberration (r = 0.483) and a strong correlation for total cornea RMS (r = 0.817). There was no directional bias between groups. The 95% limits of agreement for absolute values was 0.039 μm for trefoil at 30 degrees, 0.405 μm for trefoil at 0 degree, 0.553 μm for horizontal coma, 0.545 μm for vertical coma, 0.318 μm for spherical aberration, and 0.617 μm for RMS. Conclusions A Scheimpflug imaging device and dual Scheimpflug–Placido imaging device generated statistically different values for total cornea HOAs; however, the correlation between devices was moderate to strong and there was reasonable agreement in all measures for normal eyes. Based on these findings, the devices appear functionally equivalent for clinical use, although caution is warranted for outcomes-based research protocols that report HOAs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To compare the difference and agreement of corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in keratoconic eyes using Scheimpflug and dual Scheimpflug–Placido imaging systems. Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, and the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. Retrospective between-devices reliability and agreement study. Patients diagnosed with keratoconus were evaluated sequentially by Scheimpflug and dual Scheimpflug–Placido devices. Differences, correlations, and agreement between values for total root mean square (RMS), trefoil, coma, and spherical aberration were analyzed, and Bland-Altman plots were generated. Fifty eyes from 50 patients (31 men, 19 women) were evaluated. Trefoil at 30 degrees, spherical aberration, and total RMS were significantly different between groups (P <.05), whereas trefoil at 0 degrees and total coma values were not statistically different. There was a weak positive correlation between devices for trefoil at 0 degrees (r = 0.228), and a moderate positive correlation for trefoil at 30 degrees (r = 0.473), horizontal coma (r = 0.430), and for total corneal RMS (r = 0.637). Vertical coma (r = 0.816) and spherical aberration (r = 0.874) showed a strong positive correlation. The 95% limits of agreement (LoA) for absolute values were 1.963 μm for trefoil at 30 degrees, 2.449 μm for trefoil at 0 degrees, 3.530 μm for horizontal coma, 2.145 μm for vertical coma, 1.242 μm for spherical aberration, and 10.527 μm for RMS. Significant differences were found between measurements of corneal HOAs generated by Scheimpflug and dual Scheimpflug–Placido devices in patients with keratoconus, with generally limited correlations and wide LoA. HOAs measurements from these devices should not be considered equivalent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Facial and cranial asymmetry is common in bilateral vertebrates, particularly human beings. Through years of injecting fillers and performing face-lift operation on patients, we began to observe that more fillers were required on the right side to reach symmetry and also more loose skin and soft tissue was observed on the right side in the majority of patients (Fig. 5). Here, we conducted an analytical study to comprehensively measure human skulls in order to observe and quantify this difference., Methods: We collected forty-one natural skulls available from five medical schools of Tehran province in Iran. Standard photography was conducted from the front, lateral, and superior views. Measurements and statistics were completed using Image J software (National Institutes of Health) for exact comparison of fixed-point distances on the samples., Results: Comparison of right and left dimensions on the skulls revealed several fixed asymmetries. The most significant differences were measurements around the orbit. The distance between the upper orbit point and zygion (zy), zygion to sub-nasal, and orbital areas were significantly larger on the left side. Measuring the anterior gonion-pogonion distance showed a wider mandibular body on the left side. We did not find any considerable differences between any other left-sided and right-sided skull dimensions., Conclusions: Asymmetry of the face and body is a general rule in human anatomy, but correlation and consistency of this asymmetry between the left and right sides is a novel finding based on our measurements. Our findings showed that the orbit was significantly bigger in width, height, and surface area on the left side. We also quantified a narrower mandible on the right side. We hope these findings can be translated to aesthetic surgery practice to make the plastic surgeon and patient more familiar with the patient's specific anatomy in order to better predict, plan, and successfully implement aesthetic procedures such as injecting fillers or doing peri-orbital procedures., No Level Assigned: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.