Search

Abstract: Background: Lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a coronary heart disease (CHD) risk equivalent. Selected studies have demonstrated less intense risk factor management and diminished mobility in individuals with PAD as compared to individuals with clinical recognized CHD. However, comparable data have not been reported from a nationally representative population. Objectives: To assess the prevalence, treatment, and control of cardiovascular risk factors among individuals with PAD as defined by an ankle-brachial index (ABI) <0.90 (but without recognized CHD) as compared with individuals with recognized CHD (but without PAD). A second objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of measures of walking dysfunction to identify individuals with PAD. Design, setting, and participants: We analyzed data from 7571 participants aged 40 or older who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2004, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of the U.S. population. Results: The prevalence of PAD without CHD was 4.1% (95% CI 3.6–4.5) compared to 7.9% (7.1, 8.9) for CHD (without PAD). Hypertension prevalence was similar, but treatment and control rates were lower among individuals with PAD compared to CHD (treatment: 69% vs. 84%, p <0.001; control: 50% vs. 63%, p =0.01). Treatment of hypercholesterolemia was lower among individuals with PAD (54% vs. 79%, p <0.001) but control was similar (83% vs. 85%, p =0.78). Diabetes awareness, treatment, and control did not differ between the two groups. Walking mobility limitations were specific, but insensitive, for the identification of individuals with PAD. Conclusion: PAD in the absence of clinically recognized CHD is under-treated and poorly controlled in the general U.S. population. Leg symptoms are not adequate to identify individuals with PAD, who are at high risk of ischemic events. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is prevalent in the Medicare population and is associated with high rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, amputation, and death. Nevertheless, national health expenditures for PAD are not known. We hypothesized that PAD-related costs are high, increase with age, and that treatment rates would be less than known PAD prevalence. The objective was to determine national health care expenditures for PAD in the United States. PAD-related treatment costs were calculated in the elderly, non-disabled Medicare population. The cost analysis relied on the 5% control population for the linked SEER- Medicare data and Medicare claims for the calendar year 2001, identifying PAD cases based on diagnosis and procedure codes. Costs were aggregated separately for inpatient and outpatient treatment and estimates adjusted to reflect the Medicare population. A total of $4.37 billion was spent on PAD-related treatment and 88% of expenditures were for inpatient care. Medicare program outlays totaled $3.87 billion, while enrollees (or their supplemental insurance) spent the remaining $500 million. In total, 6.8% of the elderly Medicare population received treatment for PAD. Treatment increased with age at rates of 4.5%, 7.5%, and 11.8% for individuals aged 65-74, 75-84, and >85 years, respectively. PAD-related costs accounted for approximately 13% of all Medicare Part A and B expenditures for the PAD-treated cohort, and 2.3% of total Medicare Part A and B expenditures. In conclusion, US national PAD-related costs are high, associated with inpatient care, and increase with age. PAD is treated at rates lower than the known PAD prevalence as only approximately one-third of the population with known PAD had detectable PAD-related health care costs in our analysis. The potential impact of earlier PAD detection and use of outpatient preventive strategies on total national PAD health care costs is unknown. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There has been increasing recognition of the detrimental effect of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) on the health of Americans, and yet there is no common national program of public PAD education designed to diminish this effect. Format.' To heighten awareness of this problem, a 2-day PAD Public Education Strategy Meeting was recently attended by representatives of 17 professional societies and public health associations whose missions support the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of vascular diseases. This Public Education Strategy Meeting was intended to provide the rationale and structure to create a national PAD public awareness campaign to diminish the health effect of PAD and to improve cardiovascular outcomes in the United States. This document (1) provides the rationale for creation of a national PAD public education program; (2) reviews the development and success of national hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and Women's Heart Health public education programs as models of educational efficacy; (3) elucidates how the work of many vascular professionals has led to a national consensus for creation of a national PAD public educational program; (4) provides an overview of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute PAD education meeting; and (5) outlines the "next steps" required to accomplish these goals. Outcome: This meeting achieved consensus that we share responsibility for developing accurate, unified messages to promote PAD awareness and improved care. Participants agreed that the creation of such messages should be linked to plans to disseminate them to all Americans at risk. A consensus was reached that such messages, when commonly created and offered to the public, are most likely to achieve the rewards in better health that all Americans deserve. The Vascular Disease Foundation, a not-for-profit foundation whose mission includes public education about the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of PAD, will devote its resources to guide a new coalition in this process and to create a national PAD awareness campaign. During 2003 and 2004, the coalition will create the organizational underpinnings and time line for what will undoubtedly be a multiyear effort. Conclusion: Participants of the Public Education Strategy Meeting agreed to create a broad coalition to develop a National PAD Public Awareness Program, with the objectives to develop and disseminate public education messages on PAD. A successful national PAD education program will contribute to creation of a broader mandate to improve global cardiovascular health in the United States. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There has been increasing recognition of the detrimental impact of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) on the health of Americans, and yet there is no common national program of public PAD education designed to diminish this impact. To heighten awareness of this problem, a 2-day PAD Public Education Strategy Meeting was recently attended by representatives of 17 professional societies and public health associations whose missions support the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of vascular diseases. This Public Education Strategy Meeting was intended to provide the rationale and structure to create a national PAD public awareness campaign to diminish the health impact of PAD, and to improve cardiovascular outcomes in the USA. This paper: (1) provides the rationale for creation of a national PAD public education program; (2) reviews the development and success of national hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and Women's Heart Health public education programs as models of educational efficacy; (3) elucidates how the work of many vascular professionals has led to a national consensus for creation of a national PAD public educational program; (4) provides an overview of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute PAD education meeting; and (5) outlines the 'next steps' required to accomplish these goals. This meeting achieved consensus that we share responsibility for developing accurate, unified messages to promote PAD awareness and improved care. Participants agreed that the creation of such messages should be linked to plans to disseminate them to all Americans at risk. A consensus was reached that such messages, when commonly created and offered to the public, are most likely to achieve the rewards in better health that all Americans deserve. The Vascular Disease Foundation, a not-for-profit foundation whose mission includes public education regarding the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of PAD, will devote its resources to guide a new coalition in this process and to create a national PAD awareness campaign. During 2003 and 2004, the coalition will create the organizational underpinnings and timeline for what will undoubtedly be a multi-year effort. In conclusion, participants of the Public Education Strategy Meeting agreed to create a broad coalition to develop a national PAD public awareness program, with the objectives to develop and disseminate public education messages on PAD. A successful national PAD education program will contribute to the creation of a broader mandate to improve global cardiovascular health in the USA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) aims to provide decision makers with the evidence needed to evaluate the benefits and harms of alternative clinical management strategies. CER has become a national priority, with considerable new research funding allocated. Cardiovascular disease is a priority area for CER. This workshop report provides an overview of CER methods, with an emphasis on practical clinical trials and observational treatment comparisons. The report also details recommendations to the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute for a new framework for evidence development to foster cardiovascular CER, and specific studies to address 8 clinical issues identified by the Institute of Medicine as high priorities for cardiovascular CER. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The article presents the nature and scope of the clinical performance measures for adults with peripheral artery disease(PAD) which was developed by the Peripheral Artery Disease Performance Measures Writing Committee in the U.S. It says that the performance measures deal with lower extremity and aortic disease, as covered by the ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the patients with PAD. Mandatory sequential steps in the development of performance systems, PAD guidelines, and outcome measures are cited.

Despite its proven efficacy, low cost, and wide availability, aspirin remains underused. We examined current aspirin use and determined factors that influence its use among outpatients in the United States (US). The REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry is an international, prospective, longitudinal study of >68,000 outpatients with established atherothrombosis or ≥3 atherothrombotic risk factors. The rates of aspirin use were compared in various patient subgroups. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to determine the factors influencing the baseline use of aspirin and other antithrombotic agents in the US population. Approximately 70% of 25,686 US outpatients were treated with aspirin, with greater use in the Midwest and among men, whites, and those aged <65 years. Among aspirin users, 18% took other antiplatelet agents and 6% took oral anticoagulants. Low-dose aspirin (≤100 mg/day) was used in approximately 2/3 of aspirin users. Of patients not taking aspirin, 1/2 were receiving oral anticoagulants or other antiplatelet agents. However, 15% of patients used no antithrombotic agent at all. Female gender, current smoking, or having diabetes mellitus were predictors of a lack of antithrombotic use; white race, atrial fibrillation or vascular disease, the use of other risk-reducing medications, or treatment by a cardiologist were associated with a greater likelihood of receiving antithrombotic therapy. In conclusion, approximately 1/4 of US patients with vascular disease are not treated with aspirin for secondary prevention, and 15% are not treated with any antithrombotic agent. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]