Search

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is the only known curative treatment for myelofibrosis (MF). Risk assessment remains important for patient counseling and predicting survival outcomes for relapse and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Outcome-prediction tools can guide decision-making. Their use in MF has relied on their extrapolation from other malignancies. The primary objective of this study was to assess the performance of the Hematopoietic cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI), the augmented HCT-CI (aHCT-CI), and the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) in predicting NRM in patients with MF undergoing alloSCT. We retrospectively reviewed patients with MF undergoing alloSCT between 2012 and 2020 at the Mayo Clinic. Data were abstracted from the electronic medical record. EASIX score was calculated before starting conditioning therapy and analyzed based on log2- transformed values. We evaluated the log2-EASIX scores by quartiles to assess the effect of increasing values on NRM. NRM was evaluated using competing risk analyses. We used the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods to evaluate OS. The Fine-Gray model was used to determine risk factors for NRM. The performance of HCT-CI and aHCT-CI was compared by evaluation of model concordance given the high correlation between HCT-CI and aHCT-CI (r = .75). A total of 87 patients were evaluated. The median duration of follow-up after alloSCT was 5 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4 to 6.31 years). Patients with a high HCT-CI score had significantly increased cumulative incidence of NRM at 3 years (35.5% versus 11.6%; P = .011) after alloSCT. A progressively increasing 3-year NRM was observed with increasing aHCT-CI risk category, and patients with a high or very high aHCT-CI score had significantly higher 3-year NRM compared to those with intermediate-risk or low-risk aHCT-CI scores at 3 years post-alloSCT (31.9% versus 6.52%; P = .004). An increasing log2-EASIX score quartile was not associated with 3-year NRM (19.0% versus 10.1% versus 25% versus 14.3%; P = .59), and the EASIX score was not found to be a predictor of post-transplantation NRM. A high HCT-CI was associated with significantly worse 3-year overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 4.41; 95% CI, 1.97 to 9.87; P < .001). A high or very high aHCT-CI was significantly associated with poor 3-year OS (HR, 3.99; 95% CI, 1.56 to 10.22; P = .004). An increasing log2-EASIX score quartile group was not associated with 3-year OS (3-year OS rate, 66.7% versus 80.4% versus 64.6% versus 76.2%; P = .57). The EASIX score should not be used routinely in patients with MF. Both the HCT-CI and the aHCT-CI are accurate in predicting long-term survival outcomes in this patient population. Further studies are important to validate our findings of the role of EASIX in predicting NRM in patients with MF or other myeloproliferative neoplasms undergoing alloSCT. © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc., (Copyright © 2023 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) is an uncommon complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) that carries high morbidity and mortality. Limited contemporary data are available regarding the incidence, outcomes, and risk factors for DAH., Research Question: What are the incidence, outcomes, and risk factors for DAH developing after HCT?, Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent HCT between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2016. The incidence and outcomes of DAH development were evaluated. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze differences between survivors and nonsurvivors., Results: Of 4,350 patients undergoing first-time HCT, DAH was diagnosed in 99 (2.3%). DAH was seen in 40 of 3,536 autologous HCT recipients (1.1%) and 59 of 814 allogeneic HCT recipients (7.2%). Mean age was 53 ± 13 years, and median time of DAH diagnosis was 126 days (interquartile range, 19-349 days) after HCT. In-hospital mortality and mortality 1 year after DAH diagnosis were 55.6% and 76.8%, respectively. DAH diagnosis more than 30 days after transplantation (OR, 7.06; 95% CI, 1.65-30.14), low platelet count (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.0; P = .02), elevated international normalized ratio (INR; OR, 4.08; 95% CI, 0.64-25.88; P = .046) and need for invasive mechanical ventilation (OR, 8.18; 95% CI, 1.9-35.21) were associated with higher in-hospital mortality. Steroid treatment did not alter mortality (P = .80) or length of stay (P = .65). However, among those who received steroids, survival was higher in whose who received modest-dose steroids (< 250 mg methylprednisolone equivalent/d) compared with those who received high-dose steroids (≥ 250 mg methylprednisolone equivalent/d; OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07-0.72)., Interpretation: The mortality of DAH after HCT remains high, and DAH can occur long after transplantation. Later development of DAH (>30 days after HCT), need for invasive mechanical ventilation, thrombocytopenia, and elevated INR are all associated with worse outcomes., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To study the changes in overall outcome of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) after approval of several treatments., Patients and Methods: We identified 54,953 MDS cases in the National Cancer Data Base diagnosed from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2013, using International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd edition, codes 9980, 9982-9983, 9985-9987, 9989, 9991-9992. Overall survival and different subgroups were studied over 3 periods of diagnoses (2004-2006, 2007-2009, and 2010-2013)., Results: Median age at diagnosis was 76 years. The most common subtype was MDS-unclassifiable, which represented 55.6% of all cases. We found that males, older patients, patients with refractory anemia with excess blasts, Medicare insurance recipients, and those treated at nonacademic centers had the worse survival (P<.001). Overall survival did not improve over time, except in younger patients (<40 years old)., Conclusion: In the past decade, overall outcome of MDS did not improve despite the advent of new therapies. More studies are needed to understand the impact of newly approved treatments on the outcome of patients with MDS., (Copyright © 2019 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Acute renal failure requiring dialysis is associated with high mortality during autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). This study examined the association between acute renal failure and mortality in immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis during ASCT., Methods: Between 1996 and 2010, 408 ASCT patients were evaluated. Data were collected from electronic medical records., Results: Dialysis was performed on 72 (17.6%) patients. Eight patients started dialysis >30 days prior to ASCT (Group II), 36 started ±30 days after ASCT (Group III) and 28 initiated dialysis >1 month after ASCT (Group IV). Patients who never dialyzed were assigned to Group I. There were no significant age or sex differences. Median overall survival (OS) had not been reached in Groups I and II but was 7.0 months in Group III and 48.5 months in Group IV (P < 0.001). Treatment-related mortality (TRM) was observed in 44.4% of the patients in Group III, 6-fold higher than the next highest group (P < 0.001). The most common causes of TRM were cardiac and sepsis. In the multivariate analysis, only hypoalbuminemia (<2.5 g/dL, P < 0.001) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <40 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P < 0.001) were independently associated with starting dialysis within 30 days of ASCT., Conclusions: The study found significant differences in the OS depending on when the acute renal failure occurred. Patients who required dialysis within 30 days of ASCT had the highest rate of TRM. Screening with serum albumin and eGFR may reduce the risk., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.)