Search

Introduction: Huntington's disease (HD) is a rare, genetic, and ultimately fatal neurodegenerative disease, with a devastating impact on individuals and families across generations. Few estimates of HD epidemiology in the United States (US) exist. Methods: This study employed a retrospective cross-sectional design to examine the epidemiology of HD in the US Medicare and Medicaid beneficiary populations using 2016-2017 claims data from the Medicare 100% Research Identifiable Files (RIFs) and 2014 claims data from the Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) files for 17 states. Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 years with a diagnosis of HD (≥1 claim with ICD-10-CM code G10) in 2017 and Medicaid beneficiaries <65 years with a diagnosis of HD (≥1 claim with ICD-9-CM code 333.4) in 2014 were identified. The study outcomes included the 2017 prevalence proportion and incidence rate of HD in the Medicare population and the 2014 prevalence proportion of HD in the Medicaid population. Results: In the Medicare population, 1,941 prevalent and 819 incident cases of HD were identified in 2017, corresponding to a prevalence proportion of 13.1 per 100,000 persons and incidence rate of 6.1 per 100,000 person-years. In the Medicaid population, 353 prevalent cases of HD were identified in 2014, corresponding to a prevalence proportion of 15.2 per 100,000 persons. Conclusion: This study suggests that prevalence and incidence of HD in the US may be higher than previously estimated. This has important implications in raising awareness of HD among providers and payers and ensuring availability of and access to services for HD patients and care partners in the Medicare and Medicaid populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To examine healthcare utilization and costs in a US Medicare population diagnosed with Huntington's disease (HD). Methods: This was a retrospective matched cohort study using Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) claims data using 2013-2017 Research Identifiable Files. Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with HD based on the presence of at least one medical claim with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth or Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9/10-CM) diagnosis code for HD (ICD-9-CM: 333.4; ICD-10-CM: G10) during the identification period (2014-2016). Beneficiaries without HD were drawn from a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries and 1:1 matched to those with HD for comparison. All-cause and HD-related (any utilization related to HD diagnosis or symptoms associated with HD) healthcare utilization and costs were reported. Results: We identified 3,688 matched pairs of beneficiaries with and without HD. Of those with HD, 1,922 (52.1%) were late-stage, 916 (24.8%) were middle-stage, and 850 (23.1%) were early-stage. Mean [SD] annual total healthcare costs were higher for HD beneficiaries than beneficiaries without HD ($41,631 [57,393] vs. $17,222 [31,218], p<.001) and were primarily driven by outpatient pharmacy costs ($19,182 [45,469] vs. $4,318 [11,553], p<.001). In the stratified analysis, total healthcare costs were highest among beneficiaries with late-stage HD (mean [SD] cost: $20,475 [$41,122] for early-stage vs. $29,733 [$44,977] for middle-stage vs. $56,657 [$64,185] for late-stage; p<.001). Limitations: Results are not generalizable to beneficiaries enrolled in other non-FFS Medicare plans. Administrative claims are intended for billing purposes, not research, and may not capture all symptoms, comorbidities, and other adverse events. Conclusions: This original, comprehensive analysis of healthcare utilization and economic burden among Medicare beneficiaries with HD found that healthcare needs and associated costs are substantially higher among Medicare beneficiaries who are diagnosed with HD compared to beneficiaries without HD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Why you should read this article: • To refresh your knowledge of the genetics of Huntington's disease • To enhance your awareness of the implications of pre-symptomatic genetic testing for Huntington's disease • To reflect on situations that require special consideration before genetic testing is conducted Huntington's disease is a fatal and progressive neurodegenerative disease characterised by a shrinkage of the brain, movement abnormalities and cognitive decline. It is an autosomal dominant disease caused by a DNA mutation in the huntingtin gene located on chromosome 4. Children with one parent affected by Huntington's disease have a 50% risk of inheriting the faulty gene. Genetic testing for Huntington's disease has been available for more than 20 years and can be used for pre-symptomatic or confirmatory testing. Healthcare professionals across a variety of specialties and settings, including primary care, may encounter patients who ask to be genetically tested for Huntington's disease. This article explains the genetics of Huntington's disease, describes its clinical diagnosis, identifies some of the implications of pre-symptomatic genetic testing and discusses situations that require special consideration before the decision to conduct genetic testing is made. The article is written from a US perspective, but the implications and challenges discussed are highly relevant in the UK. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose/Objective: Persons with Huntington's disease experience stigma because of their gene status. Whereas perceived stigma has been found to impact quality of life, it is unknown how different health domains (i.e., physical, emotional, cognitive, and social) are associated with feelings of stigma. In addition, stigma research has been limited by the use of cross-sectional analyses. The current study seeks to explore which domains are associated with stigma in a longitudinal assessment of persons with Huntington's disease. Research Method/Design: The current analysis used data from the HDQLIFE study, which included 479 participants at baseline, 315 participants at 12 months, and 277 participants at 24 months. A multilevel model (time nested within person) was used to examine the effect of physical, emotional, cognitive, and social health on perceived stigma (Neuro-QoL Stigma) while controlling for demographic factors. Results: Findings indicate that physical, emotional, and cognitive health were associated with perceived stigma, whereas social health and demographic factors were not. Within-subject, time-varying predictors accounted for 20.2% of the variance in stigma. Conclusions/Implications: Our findings suggest that perceived stigma is influenced by physical, emotional, and cognitive health, which may be treated with physical therapy, emotional counseling, and cognitive rehabilitation. Application of these therapies may relieve the burden of perceived stigma; however, more research is needed in this area. Impact and Implications: This is the first longitudinal examination of the effect of different domains of health-related quality of life on perceived stigma in persons with Huntington's disease. Our findings suggest that physical therapy, emotional counseling, and cognitive rehabilitation have the potential to lessen perceived stigma in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: This study evaluated the association between provider types for patients with newly diagnosed Huntington's disease (HD) and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), costs, and treatment patterns., Materials and Methods: This retrospective analysis used MarketScan databases (1 January 2017-31 December 2021) to identify provider types who diagnosed and managed US adult patients with HD. Patients with continuous enrollment 6 months pre- and 12 months post-diagnosis were included. Outcomes evaluated over 12 months post-diagnosis included hospitalizations, outpatient visits, antipsychotic or vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitor use, and total healthcare costs., Results: Three hundred and forty eligible patients had a mean age at diagnosis of 49 years. 56.5% were female; 71.5% had a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 0. Patients were diagnosed by neurologists (48.5%), primary care providers (PCPs) (35.6%), psychiatrists (3.5%), or other providers (12.4%). Patients diagnosed by PCPs or neurologists received significantly more follow-ups by the same diagnosing provider type ( p  < 0.05). All-cause and HD-related outpatient visits at 12-month follow-up had more patients diagnosed by PCPs (23.9, 5.1) than neurologists (18.0, 2.4), psychiatrists (16.7, 1.67), or others (15.3, 2.4). HD-related mean costs totaled $2,489 ($1,179 inpatient and $1,310 outpatient). Patients diagnosed by neurologists had significantly lower HD-related total non-medication costs vs. those diagnosed by PCPs (-$2,256; p  < 0.05). Among patients diagnosed by neurologists vs. PCPs, similar proportions received antipsychotics within the first year (55 vs. 52%, respectively); more patients managed by neurologists received VMAT2 inhibitors (12 vs. 7%, respectively)., Limitations: Our study includes limitations inherent to retrospective claims studies., Conclusions: Patients with HD are most often diagnosed by neurologists or PCPs; the same diagnosing provider type typically manages follow-up. Patients diagnosed by neurologists had significantly fewer HD-related outpatient visits, lower HD-related non-drug costs, and more frequently received VMAT2 inhibitors vs. those diagnosed by PCPs. Our findings show an integrated care team may provide evidence-based, personalized care for patients with HD.

Background: Huntington's disease (HD) is an autosomal dominant, progressive neurodegenerative disorder debilitating mainly in adults., Objective: This study aimed to assess the trends in HD-related mortality regarding various demographic factors., Methods: Death certificates from the CDC WONDER were studied from 1999 to 2019, for HD-related mortality in adults aged 25 + years. Age-adjusted Mortality Rate (AAMR) per 100,000 persons and Annual Percentage Change (APC) were calculated and stratified by year, age groups, gender, race/ethnicity, state, census region, urbanization, and place of death., Results: Between 1999 to 2019, 22,595 deaths occurred in adults due to HD. The AAMR increased from 0.43 to 0.54 during this period (APC = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.84). Old adults (65-85 + years) had the highest overall AAMR, followed by middle-aged adults (45-64 years) and young adults (25-44 years) (AAMR old: 1.01 vs. AAMR middle-age: 0.68 vs. AAMR young: 0.16). Men had slightly greater overall AAMRs than women (AAMR men: 0.54 vs. AAMR women: 0.48). When stratified by race, non-Hispanic (NH) Whites had significantly higher mortality rates than NH African Americans (AAMR NH White: 0.61 vs. NH African American: 0.35), while the AAMR were lowest in Hispanic/Latino (0.28). The AAMRs also showed variation by region (overall AAMR: Midwest: 0.63, Northeast: 0.47, West: 0.48, South: 0.46), and non-metropolitan areas had higher HD-related AAMR (0.66) than metropolitan areas (0.47)., Conclusions: HD-related mortality in US adults has increased since 1999. Reflecting on the variations in trends observed, new strategies are required to optimize the quality of care in long-term care facilities.

Background: Direct-to-participant online reporting facilitates the conduct of clinical research by increasing access and clinically meaningful patient engagement., Objective: We assessed feasibility of online data collection from adults with diagnosed Huntington's disease (HD) who directly reported their problems and impact in their own words., Methods: Data were collected online from consenting United States residents who self-identified as 1) having been diagnosed with Huntington's disease, 2) able to ambulate independently, and 3) self-sufficient for most daily needs. Data for this pilot study were collected using the Huntington Study Group myHDstory online research platform. The Huntington Disease Patient Report of Problems (HD-PROP), an open-ended questionnaire, was used to capture verbatim bothersome problems and functional impact. Natural language processing, human-in-the-loop curation of verbatim reports involving clinical and experience experts, and machine learning classified verbatim-reports into clinically meaningful symptoms., Results: All 8 questionnaires in the online pilot study were completed by 345 participants who were 60.9% men, 34.5±9.9 (mean±SD) years old, and 9.5±8.4 years since HD diagnosis. Racial self-identification was 46.4% Caucasian, 28.7% African American, 15.4% American Indian/Alaska Native, and 9.5% other. Accuracy of verbatim classification was 99%. Non-motor problems were the most frequently reported symptoms; depression and cognitive impairment were the most common., Conclusions: Online research participation was feasible for a diverse cohort of adults who self-reported an HD diagnosis and predominantly non-motor symptoms related to mood and cognition. Online research tools can help inform what bothers HD patients, identify clinically meaningful outcomes, and facilitate participation by diverse and under-represented populations.

Background: Little is known about the quality of care for people living with Huntington's disease (HD) in the United States. Objective: To document the current HD care experience and identify gaps in care provision in the United States. Methods: Web-based surveys for persons self-identifying as being affected by HD (PAHD, which included individuals with, or at risk for HD) or as caregivers/family members, were developed and refined with targeted input from focus groups comprised of caregivers and family members. The surveys were disseminated via social media and patient advocacy partners from April-May 2017. Results: Total valid responses numbered 797, including 585 caregiver/family respondents and 212 PAHD responses. Respondents reported care provision from HD specialty centers, primary care, movement disorder clinics, and other settings. One in five respondents reported that the person with HD was not currently receiving medical or community care. Respondents generally reported a good level of care, with HD specialists providing the highest rated healthcare experience. Caregiver/family respondents reported helping with a range of activities including budget/finances (60.5%), housekeeping (57.1%) and daily help (53.2%). Most respondents (97.9%) reported searching online, including general information about HD (86.4%), using HD social media channels (61.3%) and looking up clinical trials (59.8%). Respondents emphasized a need for support in financial planning and accessing care, and also for more HD education in the medical community. Conclusions: There is need for more support for HD patients and families. People desire more credible, accessible information. Improving resources available to patients and families should be a goal for HD organizations, along with measurement of patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite extensive research regarding the etiology of Huntington's disease, relatively little is known about the epidemiology of this rare disorder, particularly in the United States where there are no national-scale estimates of the disease.Objectives: To provide national-scale estimates of Huntington's disease in a U.S. population and to test whether disease rates are increasing, and whether frequency varies by race, ethnicity, or other factors.Methods: Using an insurance database of over 67 million enrollees, we retrospectively identified a cohort of 3,707 individuals diagnosed with Huntington's disease between 2003 and 2016. We estimated annual incidence, annual diagnostic frequency, and tested for trends over time and differences in diagnostic frequency by sociodemographic characteristics.Results: During the observation period, the age-adjusted cumulative incidence rate was1.22 per 100,000 persons (95% confidence interval: 1.53, 1.65), and age-adjusted diagnostic frequency was 6.52 per 100,000 persons (95% confidence interval: 5.31, 5.66); both rates remained relatively stable over the 14-year period. We identified several previously unreported differences in Huntington's disease frequency by self-reported sex, income, and race/ethnicity. However, racial/ethnic differences were of lower magnitude than have previously been reported in other country-level studies.Conclusions: In these large-scale estimates of U.S. Huntington's disease epidemiology, we found stable disease frequency rates that varied by several sociodemographic factors. These findings suggest that disease patterns may be more driven by social or environmental factors than has previously been appreciated. Results further demonstrate the potential utility of administrative Big Data in rare disease epidemiology when other data sources are unavailable. © 2019 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Advances in molecular therapeutic approaches in the last decade are translating into the design of non-traditional clinical trials. In order to improve their feasibility, it is important to understand the attitudes of potential participants towards these trials, their motivations to get involved and acceptance of risks. Objective: We aimed to better understand the willingness of potential participants to participate in different molecular therapy trials for Huntington's disease (HD) based on their clinical and genetic status, trial design and goals of the treatment. Methods: An anonymous survey was distributed through the Huntington's Disease Society of America (HDSA) on-line portal/website. Various hypothetical scenarios were presented followed by a survey consistent of Likert scale responses ascertaining willingness to participate, collecting demographic, clinical and genetic information. Results: There were a total of 87 responses, including patients diagnosed with HD, pre-manifesting mutation carriers and asymptomatic participants at risk. The majority of participants indicated they were very likely or likely to participate in clinical trials independent of study design or goals of the therapy, with a more favorable view in premanifesting mutation carriers. However, more invasive procedures and trials including placebo were less favorably viewed across all diagnostic groups. Conclusions: In summary, most individuals in the HD community would consider participation in novel molecular therapy trials, but study design and goals could impact patient recruitment. This data can be used to inform the recruitment and consent process into clinical trials and to address common concerns by potential participants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Although the early and middle stages of Huntington's disease (HD) and its complications have been well described, less is known about the course of late-stage illness. In particular, little is known about the population of patients who enroll in hospice.Objectives: Our goal is to describe the characteristics of patients with HD who enrolled in hospice.Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of electronic medical record data from 12 not-for-profit hospices in the United States from 2008 to 2012.Results: Of the 164,032 patients admitted to these hospices, 101 (0.06%) had a primary diagnosis of HD. Their median age was 57 (IQR 48-65) and 53 (52.5%) were women. Most patients were cared for by a spouse (n = 36, 36.6%) or adult child (n = 20, 19.8%). At the time of admission, most patients were living either at home (n = 39, 38.6%) or in a nursing home (n = 41, 40.6%). All were either bedbound or could ambulate only with assistance. The most common symptom reported during enrollment in hospice was pain (n = 34, 33.7%) followed by anxiety (n = 30, 29.7%), nausea (n = 18, 17.8%), and dyspnea (n = 10, 9.9%). Patients had a median length of stay in hospice of 42 days, which was significantly longer than that of other hospice patients in the sample (17 days), P < 0.001. Of the 101 patients who were admitted to hospice, 73 died, 11 were still enrolled at the time of data analysis, and 17 left hospice either because they no longer met eligibility criteria (n = 14, 13.7%) or because they decided to seek treatment for other medical conditions (n = 3, 3.0%). Of the 73 patients who died while on hospice, most died either in a nursing home (n = 29; 40%) or a hospital (n = 27; 37%). Seventeen patients (23%) died at home. No patient that started in a facility died at home.Conclusion: Patients with HD are admitted to hospice at a younger age compared with other patients (57 vs. 76 years old) but have a significant symptom burden and limited functional status. Although hospice care emphasizes the importance of helping patients to remain in their homes, only a minority of these patients were able to die at home. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To provide more recent estimates of healthcare utilization and costs in Huntington's disease (HD) in the Medicaid population., Materials and Methods: This retrospective analysis used administrative claims data for HD beneficiaries (≥1 HD claim; ICD-9-CM 333.4) from Medicaid Analytic eXtract data files from 1 January 2010-31 December 2014. The date of the first HD claim during the identification period (1 January 2011-31 December 2013) was assigned as the index date. If a beneficiary had multiple HD claims during the identification period, one was randomly chosen as the index date. Beneficiaries were required to be continuously enrolled in fee-for-service plans during the 1-year pre-index and post-index periods. Medicaid beneficiaries without HD were drawn from a 100% random sample and matched (3:1) to those with HD. Beneficiaries were classified by disease stage (early/middle/late). All-cause and HD-related (any utilization related to HD diagnosis or symptoms associated with HD) healthcare utilization and costs were reported., Results: A total of 1,785 beneficiaries without HD were matched to 595 beneficiaries with HD (139 early-, 78 middle-, and 378 late-stage). The mean (SD) annual total costs were higher for beneficiaries with HD than beneficiaries without HD ($73,087 [$75,140] vs. $26,834 [$47,659], p  <.001) and driven by inpatient costs ($45,190 [$48,185] vs. $13,808 [$39,596], p  <.001). Total healthcare costs were highest among beneficiaries with late-stage HD (mean [SD] cost: $22,797 [$31,683] for early-stage HD vs. $55,294 [$129,290] for middle-stage HD vs. $95,251 [$60,197] for late-stage HD; p  <.001)., Limitations: Administrative claims are intended for billing purposes and subject to coding errors. This study did not address functional status, which may provide further insight to late-stage and end-of-life burden of HD, and indirect costs., Conclusions: Medicaid beneficiaries with HD have higher acute healthcare utilization and costs compared to beneficiaries without HD, which tend to increase with disease progression, indicating that HD beneficiaries at later disease stages have greater burden.

Aims: Quantify healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs for individuals with late-onset Huntington's disease (LoHD) and compare these with adult-onset HD (AoHD) and non-HD controls., Methods: This retrospective cohort study used US healthcare claims data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases. Individuals newly diagnosed with HD between 1/1/2009 and 12/31/2017 were selected (index date was first HD claim). Individuals ≥60 years of age at the index date were categorized as having LoHD while individuals 21-59 years of age were categorized as having AoHD. Non‑HD controls were exact matched 2:1 to LoHD and AoHD cohorts. Individuals were required to have continuous enrollment for ≥12 months pre- and post-index. Twelve-month all-cause HRU and healthcare costs were assessed for each cohort., Results: In total, 763 individuals with LoHD and 1,073 individuals with AoHD were matched with 3,762 non-HD controls. Unadjusted all-cause HRU in the 12 months post-index was higher for individuals with LoHD and AoHD compared with non-HD controls across most service categories. Adjusted all-cause HRU for the LoHD cohort was significantly higher compared with non-HD controls across all service categories. In the 12 months post-index, mean total costs for the LoHD cohort ($29,055) were significantly higher than for non-HD controls (≥60 years old: $17,286; 21-59 years old: $12,688; p <.001) and similar to total costs in the AoHD cohort ($31,701; p =.47)., Limitations: It was not possible to control for differences in HD stage but regression models were adjusted for baseline HRU. Evaluations of costs did not include indirect costs, which are known to be significant components of the wider HD burden., Conclusions: This study provides the first analysis of HRU and costs in LoHD, demonstrating that individuals with LoHD experience a significantly higher healthcare burden compared with non-HD controls and a similarly high burden compared with individuals with AoHD.

Abstract: Background: The purpose of this descriptive, retrospective analysis was to develop a demographic and clinical profile of nursing home residents with a diagnosis of Huntington's disease (HD). Methods: Queries were made of a large data repository of linked and de-identified Minimum Data Set version 3.0 and prescription claims records, for the time period of October 1, 2010 through March 31, 2012. Results: Of 249,811 residents, 340 (0.14%) had a diagnosis of HD; 61% were female and 77.9% were Caucasian. The age range mode was 55–59 years (15%). Approximately one-half of the residents with HD exhibited communication difficulties, 78% had moderate or severe cognitive impairment, and most have significant functional limitations. Depression, dementia, anxiety, psychosis, and bipolar disease were present in 59.4%, 50.9%, 35.9%, and 23.2%, and 9.7%, respectively. Only 21% of residents with HD exhibited troublesome behavioral symptoms. Comorbidities of diabetes and cancer were uncommon (0.3%). Use of physical restraints (excluding bed rails) was considerably higher in residents with HD than in the general nursing home population. Falls were documented in almost one-half of residents. Antipsychotics were used in 61.6% of residents; 16.2% had psychotic symptoms. One was treated with tetrabenazine. Anxiolytics were received by 59.1% of residents, whereas only 35.9% had anxiety noted on Minimum Data Set records. Conclusions: The prevalence of HD in US nursing homes is very low (0.14%). Affected residents have significant cognitive and functional impairments, but problematic behaviors are present in only a minority. Serious comorbidities such as cancer and diabetes are rare. Antipsychotics, antidepressants, and anxiolytics are the mainstays of treatment. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

This article describes the contours of the residential care placement experience for social service staff, health care providers, and their client families of patients with Huntington's disease. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors, conditions, and barriers encountered by outpatient clinical staff and families in the transition to skilled nursing care. A Long-Term Care Contact Survey was developed to (a) gather information about long-term care referral sites; (b) determine the factors considered in choosing a facility; (c) describe the factors that hindered the transition to long-term care; (d) describe conditions prior to institutionalization; and (e) determine research interest. The study found that large cohorts of patients with Huntington's disease in residential care are scarce. A lack of confidence in the available options suggests the need for increased support for educational and social services to facility staff. Speech/swallowing therapy and physical therapy as placement facilitators reflect salient issues of latter stages of the disease, implicating funding support needs. Families facing this transition require long-term guidance for financial, caregiving, and psychosocial issues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Huntington's Disease Society of America Centers of Excellence (HDSA COEs) are primary hubs for Huntington's disease (HD) research opportunities and accessing new treatments. Data on the extent to which HDSA COEs are accessible to individuals with HD, particularly those older or disabled, are lacking., Objective: To describe persons with HD in the U.S. Medicare program and characterize this population by proximity to an HDSA COE., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of Medicare beneficiaries ages ≥65 with HD in 2017. We analyzed data on benefit entitlement, demographics, and comorbidities. QGis software and Google Maps Interface were employed to estimate the distance from each patient to the nearest HDSA COE, and the proportion of individuals residing within 100 miles of these COEs at the state level., Results: Among 9,056 Medicare beneficiaries with HD, 54.5% were female, 83.0% were white; 48.5% were ≥65 years, but 64.9% originally qualified for Medicare due to disability. Common comorbidities were dementia (32.4%) and depression (35.9%), and these were more common in HD vs. non-HD patients. Overall, 5,144 (57.1%) lived within 100 miles of a COE. Race/ethnicity, sex, age, and poverty markers were not associated with below-average proximity to HDSA COEs. The proportion of patients living within 100 miles of a center varied from < 10% (16 states) to > 90% (7 states). Most underserved states were in the Mountain and West Central divisions., Conclusion: Older Medicare beneficiaries with HD are frequently disabled and have a distinct comorbidity profile. Geographical, rather than sociodemographic factors, define the HD population with limited access to HDSA COEs.

Aims: To quantify healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs by disease stage in individuals with Huntington's disease (HD) in a US population., Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study used administrative claims data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial, Multi-State Medicaid, and Medicare Supplemental Databases between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2018. Individuals with an HD claim between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2017 were selected. Index date was the date of first HD diagnosis. Individuals were required to have continuous enrollment for ≥ 12 months pre-index, 3 months post-index, and have no pre-index HD claims. All-cause HRU and costs per patient per month (PPPM) (overall and stratified by disease stage) were assessed for individuals with HD., Results: A total of 2,669 individuals with HD were identified. Of these, 1,432 (53.7%), 689 (25.8%), and 548 (20.5%) had early-, middle-, and late-stage HD at baseline, respectively. Mean HRU PPPM by post-index HD stage increased with disease stage for outpatient visits, pharmacy claims, and HD-related pharmacy claims ( p  < 0.05 for all). Mean inpatient visits and emergency room visits PPPM were highest in individuals with middle-stage HD ( p  <0.05 for all). Mean total all-cause healthcare cost PPPM for individuals with HD was $2,889, and it was significantly higher in middle-stage individuals, at $7,988, compared with early- and late-stage individuals, at $3,726 and $5,125, respectively; p  <0.0001., Limitations: In the absence of disease staging information in administrative claims data, staging was based on the presence of clinical markers in claims. Our evaluations didn't include the indirect costs of HD, which may be substantial as HD typically affects people at their peak earning potential., Conclusions: HRU and costs of care are high among individuals with HD, particularly among those with middle- and late-stage disease. This indicates that the disease burden in HD increases with disease stage, highlighting the need for interventions that can slow or prevent disease progression.

In the sanctity of pure drug discovery, objective reasoning can become clouded when pursuing ideas that appear unorthodox, but are spot on physiologically. To put this into historical perspective, it was an unorthodox idea in the 1950's to suggest that warfarin, a rat poison, could be repositioned into a breakthrough drug in humans to protect against strokes as a blood thinner. Yet it was approved in 1954 as Coumadin® and has been prescribed to billions of patients as a standard of care. Similarly, no one can forget the horrific effects of thalidomide, prescribed or available without a prescription, as both a sleeping pill and "morning sickness" anti-nausea medication targeting pregnant women in the 1950's. The "thalidomide babies" became the case-in-point for the need of strict guidelines by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) or full multi-species teratogenicity testing before drug approval. More recently it was found that thalidomide is useful in graft versus host disease, leprosy and resistant tuberculosis treatment, and as an anti-angiogenesis agent as a breakthrough drug for multiple myeloma (except for pregnant female patients). Decades of diabetes drug discovery research has historically focused on every possible angle, except, the energy-out side of the equation, namely, raising mitochondrial energy expenditure with chemical uncouplers. The idea of "social responsibility" allowed energy-in agents to be explored and the portfolio is robust with medicines of insulin sensitizers, insulin analogues, secretagogues, SGLT2 inhibitors, etc., but not energy-out medicines. The primary reason? It appeared unorthodox, to return to exploring a drug platform used in the 1930s in over 100,000 obese patients used for weight loss. This is over 80-years ago and prior to Dr Peter Mitchell explaining the mechanism of how mitochondrial uncouplers, like 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP) even worked by three decades later in 1961. Although there is a clear application for metabolic disease, it was not until recently that this platform was explored for its merit at very low, weight-neutral doses, for treating insidious human illnesses and completely unrelated to weight reduction. It is known that mitochondrial uncouplers specifically target the entire organelle's physiology non-genomically. It has been known for years that many neuromuscular and neurodegenerative diseases are associated with overt production of reactive oxygen species (ROSs), a rise in isoprostanes (biomarker of mitochondrial ROSs in urine or blood) and poor calcium (Ca2+) handing. It has also been known that mitochondrial uncouplers lower ROS production and Ca2+ overload. There is evidence that elevation of isoprostanes precedes disease onset, in Alzheimer's Disease (AD). It is also curious, why so many neurodegenerative diseases of known and unknown etiology start at mid-life or later, such as Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Huntington Disease (HD), AD, Parkinson Disease, and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). Is there a relationship to a buildup of mutations that are sequestered over time due to ROSs exceeding the rate of repair? If ROS production were managed, could disease onset due to aging be delayed or prevented? Is it possible that most, if not all neurodegenerative diseases are manifested through mitochondrial dysfunction? Although DNP, a historic mitochondrial uncoupler, was used in the 1930s at high doses for obesity in well over 100,000 humans, and so far, it has never been an FDA-approved drug. This review will focus on the application of using DNP, but now, repositioned as a potential disease-modifying drug for a legion of insidious diseases at much lower and paradoxically, weight neutral doses. DNP will be addressed as a treatment for "metabesity", an emerging term related to the global comorbidities associated with the over-nutritional phenotype; obesity, diabetes, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, but including neurodegenerative disorders and accelerated aging. Some unexpected drug findings will be discussed, such as DNP's induction of neurotrophic growth factors involved in neuronal heath, learning and cognition. For the first time in 80's years, the FDA has granted (to Mitochon Pharmaceutical, Inc., Blue Bell, PA, USA) an open Investigational New Drug (IND) approval to begin rigorous clinical testing of DNP for safety and tolerability, including for the first ever, pharmacokinetic profiling in humans. Successful completion of Phase I clinical trial will open the door to explore the merits of DNP as a possible treatment of people with many truly unmet medical needs, including those suffering from HD, MS, PD, AD, ALS, Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD), and Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Deutetrabenazine is a derivative of tetrabenazine in which two trideuteromethoxy groups substitute two methoxy groups. The active metabolites of deutetrabenazine have a longer half-life than those of tetrabenazine, together with a greater overall absorption. However, the peak plasma concentrations are lower. Because of these pharmacokinetic differences, deutetrabenazine can be given twice daily, thus improving compliance. The lower peak concentrations may account for a lower incidence of some unwanted adverse effects. Unlike tetrabenazine, deutetrabenazine has no effect on the QT interval. Treatment with deutetrabenazine significantly improved chorea in Huntington's disease, the hyperkinetic features of tardive dyskinesia, and tics in Tourette syndrome. In all three conditions, deutetrabenazine produced an acceptable level of overall adverse effects without causing any severe adverse effects., (Copyright 2017 Clarivate Analytics.)

Background: Huntington's disease (HD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that spans distinct disease stages over 15-20 years. Various interventions are available which may allow patients to live outside of a nursing home for a longer time. However, little is known about use of these interventions by disease stage and by insurance type., Objective: We compared use of interventions among early, middle and late stages of HD in commercial (C) and Medicaid (M) health insurance populations., Methods: HD patients (ICD-9-CM 333.4) were identified from Thomson Reuters' MarketScan C and M database (2002-2009) and hierarchically grouped into disease stages based upon the presence of defining clinical markers., Results: A total of 1,272 HD patients (752/520 C/M) were identified. While stage distribution was nearly uniform in the C database - 34.0/35.5/34.0% (early/middle/late stage) - in the M population the majority were late stage (74.0%). Overall mean age was similar between C and M populations. Among late-stage patients, more M patients resided in a nursing home (M:73.8% v. C:40.6%) and received hospice care (M:18.4% v. C:11.3%). Physical therapy (PT) and home assistance were the most frequent interventions used by middle-stage patients, however more C patients received PT (C:64.0% v. M:37.1%) while more M patients received home assistance (M:75.3% v. C:53.2%). Among late-stage patients, PT was also higher in the C population (56.3% v. 48.3%). More M patients had assistive devices at home in both middle (M:25.8% v. C:9.7%) and late stages (M:35.6% v.C:23.4%)., Conclusions: Apparent interventional differences emerged which varied by disease stage and insurance type.