Search

Fundamental to the quality of life is assisting patients in relieving pain including at the end of life. Compassionate, effective, evidence-based pain care for the dying improves the quality of life for patients and may reduce distress and complicated bereavement in the loved ones witnessing this death. However, efforts designed to mitigate the consequences of the opioid epidemic have seriously compromised pain care at the end of life. This has created an urgent need to focus on the barriers to relief, and solutions necessary to provide safe and effective pain and symptom management in this population. To that end, a committee of experts was convened by the American Society for Pain Management Nursing and the Hospice and Palliative Nursing Association. These experts reviewed the current literature, developed a draft position statement which underwent consecutive revisions. This statement was then endorsed by the respective organizations. Elucidation of barriers to effective pain control in advanced disease allows targeted interventions; including those related to clinical care, education, accessibility, and research. As nurses, we must continuously advocate for humane and dignified care, promoting ethical, effective pain and symptom management at the end of life for all., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To evaluate the relative cost-effectiveness of tildrakizumab and other biologic and targeted systemic treatments compared with a mix of topical therapies, phototherapies, and other conventional systemic therapies as first-line treatment for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis from a United States payer's perspective., Methods: A Markov model consisting of health states based on Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) response rate categories and death was developed. The probabilities of achieving PASI responses were derived from a network meta-analysis based on published efficacy data. Health care costs and effectiveness measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated. Incremental costs per QALY gained of each biologic/targeted first-line treatment versus a mix of conventional treatments were compared to provide relative cost-effectiveness among biologic and targeted first-line treatments., Results: Over 10 years, the incremental cost per QALY gained compared with a mix of topical therapies, phototherapies, and other oral systemic therapies was lowest for brodalumab, infliximab, apremilast, and tildrakizumab, followed by secukinumab, ixekizumab, guselkumab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, and etanercept. The position of tildrakizumab relative to the other treatments remained the same across multiple scenarios., Conclusions: Tildrakizumab is among the most cost-effective first-line therapies for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and is more cost-effective than secukinumab, ixekizumab, guselkumab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, and etanercept.

Purpose: Fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare expenditures for advanced imaging studies (defined as computed tomography [CT], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], positron emission tomography [PET] scans, and nuclear medicine studies [NM]) rapidly increased in the past two decades for patients with cancer. Imaging rates are unknown for patients with cancer, whether under or over age 65 years, in health maintenance organizations (HMOs), where incentives may differ., Materials and Methods: Incident cases of breast, colorectal, lung, prostate, leukemia, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) cancers diagnosed in 2003 and 2006 from four HMOs in the Cancer Research Network were used to determine 2-year overall mean imaging counts and average total imaging costs per HMO enrollee by cancer type for those under and over age 65., Results: There were 44,446 incident cancer patient cases, with a median age of 75 (interquartile range, 71-81), and 454,029 imaging procedures were performed. The mean number of images per patient increased from 7.4 in 2003 to 12.9 in 2006. Rates of imaging were similar across age groups, with the exception of greater use of echocardiograms and NM studies in younger patients with breast cancer and greater use of PET among younger patients with lung cancer. Advanced imaging accounted for approximately 41% of all imaging, or approximately 85% of the $8.7 million in imaging expenditures. Costs were nearly $2,000 per HMO enrollee; costs for younger patients with NHL, leukemia, and lung cancer were nearly $1,000 more in 2003., Conclusion: Rates of advanced imaging appear comparable among FFS and HMO participants of any age with these six cancers., (Copyright © 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Problem: Antithrombin (AT) replacement has been described in patients with hereditary AT deficiency undergoing delivery; however, the kinetics of AT replacement in preeclampsia is not adequately understood. Therefore, the Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Recombinant Antithrombin in Very Preterm Preeclampsia (PRESERVE-1) study has been proposed., Methods: Sixty women aged≥18 years at 24 0/7-28 0/7 weeks' gestation and with hypertension and proteinuria will be enrolled and randomly assigned to receive recombinant human AT or placebo until fetal and/or maternal indications cause cessation of expectant management or until 34 0/7 weeks' gestation. The primary endpoint is the increase in gestational age from randomization to delivery. Safety assessments and laboratory assays will also be performed., Results: PRESERVE-1 study enrollment will begin during the second half of 2013., Conclusion: The PRESERVE-1 study will provide further insight into the pharmacokinetic activity and safety of AT therapy in preeclampsia., (© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

It is a truism that, for innovative eHealth systems to have true value and impact, they must first and foremost be usable and accessible by clinicians, consumers, and other stakeholders. In this paper, current trends and future challenges in the usability and accessibility of consumer health informatics will be described. Consumer expectations of their healthcare providers and healthcare records in this new era of consumer-directed care will be explored, and innovative visualizations, assistive technologies, and other ways that healthcare information is currently being provided and/or shared will be described. Challenges for ensuring the usability of current and future systems will also be discussed. An innovative model for conducting systematic, timely, user-centered research on consumer-facing websites at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the ongoing efforts at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to promote health information technology (HIT) usability standards and evaluation criteria will also be presented., (Copyright © 2011 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Platelet-activating factor (PAF) is a potent proinflammatory mediator implicated in the pathogenesis of both severe sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome. One of the regulatory pathways for PAF involves degradation to the inactive metabolite lyso-PAF by the enzyme PAF acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH). Because reduced concentrations of the natural form of PAF-AH have been reported in septic patients, the present study was conducted to determine whether treatment with recombinant human PAF-AH (rPAF-AH, Pafase) was safe when administered after the onset of severe sepsis and whether it decreases the prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome and 28-day all-cause mortality., Design: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial., Setting: Thirty-three medical and surgical intensive care units located in the United States., Patients: A total of 127 patients with severe sepsis, but without established acute respiratory distress syndrome, were enrolled in the study. Randomization occurred within 12 hrs of the onset of severe sepsis. Patients then received 1.0 mg/kg rPAF-AH (n = 45), 5.0 mg/kg rPAF-AH (n = 39), or placebo (n = 43) administered intravenously, once daily, for five consecutive days., Measurements and Main Results: Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics of the three treatment groups were similar, except for a significantly higher prevalence of respiratory tract infections as the cause of severe sepsis in patients treated with 1.0 mg/kg rPAF-AH. There were no treatment-related deaths, and the overall prevalence of adverse events was similar among rPAF-AH-treated and placebo-treated patients. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome among the three treatment groups. However, 28-day all-cause mortality was 21% in the 1.0 mg/kg rPAF-AH group, 28% in the 5.0 mg/kg rPAF-AH group, and 44% in the placebo group (overall chi-square p =.07; 1.0 mg/kg rPAF-AH vs. placebo, p =.03). A trend toward reduced multiple organ dysfunction also was observed in the 1.0 mg/kg rPAF-AH group compared with the placebo group (p =.11)., Conclusion: The results from this study indicate that rPAF-AH was well tolerated and should be pursued as a potential new treatment to decrease mortality in patients with severe sepsis.