1. Survival After Solid Cancers in Antithrombotic Trials.
- Author
-
Serebruany, Victor L., Tomek, Ales, and Moo Hyun Kim
- Subjects
- *
FIBRINOLYTIC agents , *ANTICOAGULANTS , *ANTINEOPLASTIC agents , *CANCER patients , *CLINICAL trials , *COMPARATIVE studies , *CONFIDENCE intervals , *PROBABILITY theory , *PUBLIC health surveillance , *SURVIVAL analysis (Biometry) , *TUMORS , *SECONDARY analysis , *CLOPIDOGREL , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *ODDS ratio - Abstract
The impact of antithrombotics on cancer is currently under intense investigation because of the excess of solid cancers in trials after thienopyridines such as TRITON (prasugrel), DAPT (prasugrel and clopidogrel), PAR-1 thrombin antagonist in TRACER (vorapaxar), pyrimidines in PEGASUS (ticagrelor), and in APPRAISE-2 after apixaban. However, whether patient survival after solid cancer (SASC) in antithrombotic trials may be affected is unknown. We matched the 1-year SASC rate in antithrombotic trials reported by Food and Drug Administration with the census averages in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program by the US National Cancer Institute and World Health Organization (WHO) surveys. The Food and Drug Administration provided the SASC data for 3 trials with similar cancer survival of about 70% for the first year of follow-up in TRITON, APPRAISE-2, and ARISTOTEL. Adjusted cancers in TRITON with SEER (odds ratio 0.92; 95% confidence interval 0.53 to 1.59, p = 0.4351) and WHO (odds ratio 0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.57 to 1.7, p = 1.00) revealed very close if not identical SASC rates in antithrombotic trials compared to epidemiologic census estimates. In conclusion, SASC rates in patients enrolled in antithrombotic trials do not differ from SEER or World Health Organization averages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF