Search

Importance: The importance of this study is to explore potential differences in pathophysiologies of OAB-wet and OAB-dry., Objectives: The aim of this study was to define fundamental and unique presenting features of patients exhibiting storage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) with urgency incontinence (OAB-wet) and patients without urgency incontinence (OAB-dry)., Study Design: This was a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases-sponsored Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network. Demographic, physical examination, and questionnaire responses were analyzed for women seeking care for LUTS at 6 U.S. centers. Differences between OAB-wet and OAB-dry patients were compared using the Fisher exact test and Mann-Whitney U test. Differences in questionnaire data were assessed using a Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction., Results: Fifty-six, 84, and 67 women were included in the OAB-dry, wet, and control cohorts, respectively. There was no difference in demographic and physical examination characteristics of the 2 groups. OAB-wet patients reported more urgency incontinence symptoms (LUTS 16a, P < 0.001). OAB-dry reported more bladder pain, feeling of incomplete bladder emptying (LUTS 4, P < 0.001), and a need to strain to urinate (AUA-SI 7, P = 0.003). Sensation of incomplete emptying and straining with urination did not correlate with elevated postvoid residual volumes. Although degrees of symptomatic bother were similar, bother in OAB-dry patients was most closely related to pelvic floor tenderness severity, whereas bother in OAB-wet patients was most related to urgency severity., Conclusions: Women with OAB-dry have distinct presenting features of straining with urination, bladder pain, and a feeling of incomplete emptying. These suggest a unique pathophysiology driving OAB-dry symptoms, which we hypothesize is pelvic floor myofascial dysfunction., (Copyright © 2022 American Urogynecologic Society. All rights reserved.)

Background: The majority of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients develop some form of lower urinary tract dysfunction, usually as a result of neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO). Patients identify urinary incontinence as one of the worst aspects of this disease. Despite the high prevalence of NDO, urological evaluation and treatment are significantly under-accessed in this population. The objectives of this study were: 1) to adapt the previously validated Actionable Bladder Symptom Screening Tool (ABSST) to a short form for ease and brevity of application in a clinical setting that is clinically meaningful; and 2) to develop a scoring algorithm that would be interpretable in terms of referring/considering precise diagnosis and treatment., Methods: A US-based, non-randomized, multi-center, stand-alone observational study was conducted to assess the psychometric properties of the ABSST among patients who have MS with and without NDO. Mixed psychometric methods (e.g., classical statistics (Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994) and item response methods (Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 2001)) were used to evaluate the predictive and clinical validity of the shortened form. The latter included clinicians flagging clinically meaningful items and associated response options which would indicate the need for further evaluation or treatment., Results: A total of 151 patients, all with MS and with and without NDO, were recruited by 28 clinicians in various US geographical locations. Approximately 41% of patients reported a history of or currently having urinary incontinence and/or urinary urgency. The prediction model across the entire range of classification thresholds was evaluated, plotting the true positive identification rate against the false positive rate (1-Specificity) for various cut scores. In this study, the cut-point or total score of greater than or equal to 6 had a sensitivity of approximately 85%, and specificity of approximately 93% (i.e., 85% patients would warrant being referred to a urologist and 93% of the patients whose symptoms would not warrant urologist referral)., Conclusions: Overall the short form ABSST demonstrated sensitivity and specificity as it maintained the integrity of the longer form tool. Concurrent validity for each subscale as well as predictive and concurrent validity of the total shortened instrument was demonstrated. This instrument provides a new method for assessing bladder problems among MS patients, and may facilitate earlier and more precise diagnosis, treatment, and/or referral to a specialist.