5 results on '"Pro, B."'
Search Results
2. ASTCT and USCLC Clinical Practice Recommendations for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant in Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome.
- Author
-
Goyal A, O'Leary D, Dabaja B, Weng WK, Zain J, Cutler C, Guitart J, Kim YH, Geskin LJ, Hoppe RT, Wilson LD, Beaven AW, Horwitz S, Allen PB, Barta SK, Bohjanen K, Brammer JE, Carter JB, Comfere N, DeSimone JA, Dusenbery K, Duvic M, Huen A, Jagadeesh D, Kelsey CR, Khodadoust MS, Lechowicz MJ, Mehta-Shah N, Moskowitz AJ, Olsen EA, Poh C, Pro B, Querfeld C, Sauter C, Sokol L, Sokumbi O, Wilcox RA, Zic JA, Hamadani M, and Foss F
- Subjects
- Humans, Skin Neoplasms therapy, Skin Neoplasms pathology, United States epidemiology, Consensus, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Mycosis Fungoides therapy, Sezary Syndrome therapy, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Transplantation, Homologous
- Abstract
Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) are the most common subtypes of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). While MF generally follows an indolent course, a subset of patients will experience progressive and/or treatment-refractory disease; Sézary syndrome is an aggressive lymphoma associated with high morbidity and mortality. Although allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) is the only currently available potentially curative treatment modality for MF/SS there is no published guidance on referral criteria, transplant timing orallo-HCT approach. To develop consensus clinical practice recommendations, we performed a Delphi survey of 32 specialists in dermatology (n = 9), transplant hematology/oncology (n = 10), non-transplant hematology/oncology (n = 8), and radiation oncology (n = 5) from across the United States. Consensus required agreement of ≥75% of participants. Sixteen consensus statements were generated on four topics: (1) criteria for referral for consideration for allo-HCT, (2) allo-HCT preparative regimens and procedures (3) disease status at the time of allo-HCT, and (4) multidisciplinary management in the pre- and post-transplant settings. These clinical practice guidelines provide a framework for decision-making regarding allo-HCT for MF/SS and highlight areas for future prospective investigation., (Copyright © 2024 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Impact of race and social determinants of health on outcomes in patients with aggressive B-cell NHL treated with CAR-T therapy.
- Author
-
Karmali R, Machhi R, Epperla N, Shouse G, Romancik J, Moyo TK, Kenkre V, Ollila TA, Fitzgerald L, Hess B, David K, Roy I, Zurko J, Chowdhury SM, Annunzio K, Ferdman R, Bhansali RS, Harris EI, Liu J, Nizamuddin I, Ma S, Moreira J, Winter J, Pro B, Stephens DM, Danilov A, Shah NN, Cohen JB, Barta SK, Torka P, and Gordon LI
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Asian, Black or African American, Racial Groups, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, United States, White, Insurance, Health, Insurance Coverage, Immunotherapy, Adoptive economics, Lymphoma, B-Cell economics, Lymphoma, B-Cell mortality, Lymphoma, B-Cell therapy, Social Determinants of Health economics, Social Determinants of Health ethnology
- Abstract
Abstract: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell (CAR-T) immunotherapy is an effective therapy for relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (r/r B-NHL). However, data are limited on the impact of the convergence of race and social determinants of health on outcomes for patients treated with CAR-T therapy. We examined the impact of interactions between race and insurance type on health care use and outcomes in patients treated with CAR-T therapy for aggressive B-NHL. Adult patients with r/r B-NHL treated with CD19 CAR-Ts were identified between 2015 and 2021 across 13 US academic centers. Insurance type, demographic, and clinical data were collected and analyzed. In total, 466 adult patients were included in our analysis. Median follow-up after CAR-T therapy was 12.7 months. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was longer for Caucasians (11.5 months) than for African Americans (3.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 1.56 [1.03-2.4]; P = .04) or Asians (2.7 months; HR, 1.7 [1.02-2.67]; P = .04). Differences in median overall survival (mOS) were not significant. For Medicare (n = 206) vs Medicaid (n = 33) vs private insurance (n = 219) vs self-pay (n = 7): mPFS was 15.9 vs 4.2 vs 6.0 vs 0.9 months (P < .001), respectively; and mOS was 31.2 vs 12.8 vs 21.5 vs 3.2 months (P < .001), respectively. Our multicenter retrospective analysis showed that race and insurance status can affect outcomes for patients treated with CAR-T therapy., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Women's Representation in Leadership Positions in Academic Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, and Surgical Oncology Programs.
- Author
-
Chowdhary M, Chowdhary A, Royce TJ, Patel KR, Chhabra AM, Jain S, Knoll MA, Vapiwala N, Pro B, and Marwaha G
- Subjects
- Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Leadership, United States, Academic Medical Centers, Faculty, Medical supply & distribution, Medical Oncology education, Physicians, Women supply & distribution, Radiation Oncology organization & administration, Surgical Oncology organization & administration
- Abstract
Importance: Women are underrepresented in medical leadership positions; however, representation of women among academic oncology leadership is unknown., Objectives: To evaluate representation of women overall and in leadership positions in academic medical oncology (MO), radiation oncology (RO), and surgical oncology (SO) programs and to examine the association of women leadership with overall faculty representation of women per program., Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, MO, RO, and SO training program websites were queried from October 2018 through June 2019. All faculty from 265 of 273 accredited MO, RO, and SO training programs (97.1%) were included., Exposure: Gender., Main Outcomes and Measures: Observed proportions of women in leadership positions compared with the expected proportion of overall women faculty in MO, RO, and SO were assessed. Rates of representation of women across each MO, RO, and SO program's faculty based on the presence or absence of a woman in a leadership position were compared., Results: Of 6030 total faculty, only 2164 (35.9%) were women. Total representation of women among MO, RO, and SO faculty was 37.1% (1563 of 4215), 30.7% (389 of 1269), and 38.8% (212 of 546), respectively. Women composed only 21.7% (30 of 138), 11.7% (11 of 94), and 3.8% (1 of 26) of MO, RO, and SO chair positions, respectively. The observed proportion of women in chair positions was significantly lower than the expected proportion for MO, RO, and SO. In all, 47.9%, 33%, and 18.5% of MO, RO, and SO programs, respectively, had at least 1 woman in a leadership position (program director or chair). Programs with 1 or more women in a leadership position were associated with a higher mean (SD) percentage of women faculty than those without at least 1 woman leader in MO (40.7% [12.5%] vs 33.1% [11.0%]; P < .001) and RO (36.2% [13.3%] vs 23.4% [12.3%]; P < .001) but not SO (40.2% [15.4%] vs 31.4% [16.9%]; P = .29)., Conclusions and Relevance: Gender disparity exists in academic MO, RO, and SO faculty, which is magnified at the chair level. Programs in MO and RO with a woman physician in a leadership position were associated with a higher percentage of women faculty, but this was not true for SO. These data will serve as a benchmark to monitor progress toward a more balanced workforce.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Mogamulizumab versus vorinostat in previously treated cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (MAVORIC): an international, open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial.
- Author
-
Kim YH, Bagot M, Pinter-Brown L, Rook AH, Porcu P, Horwitz SM, Whittaker S, Tokura Y, Vermeer M, Zinzani PL, Sokol L, Morris S, Kim EJ, Ortiz-Romero PL, Eradat H, Scarisbrick J, Tsianakas A, Elmets C, Dalle S, Fisher DC, Halwani A, Poligone B, Greer J, Fierro MT, Khot A, Moskowitz AJ, Musiek A, Shustov A, Pro B, Geskin LJ, Dwyer K, Moriya J, Leoni M, Humphrey JS, Hudgens S, Grebennik DO, Tobinai K, and Duvic M
- Subjects
- Aged, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized adverse effects, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological adverse effects, Australia, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Europe, Female, Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors adverse effects, Humans, Japan, Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous mortality, Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous pathology, Male, Middle Aged, Mycosis Fungoides mortality, Mycosis Fungoides pathology, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Neoplasm Staging, Progression-Free Survival, Sezary Syndrome mortality, Sezary Syndrome pathology, Time Factors, United States, Vorinostat adverse effects, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized administration & dosage, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological administration & dosage, Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors administration & dosage, Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous drug therapy, Mycosis Fungoides drug therapy, Sezary Syndrome drug therapy, Vorinostat administration & dosage
- Abstract
Background: Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas are rare non-Hodgkin lymphomas with substantial morbidity and mortality in advanced disease stages. We compared the efficacy of mogamulizumab, a novel monoclonal antibody directed against C-C chemokine receptor 4, with vorinostat in patients with previously treated cutaneous T-cell lymphoma., Methods: In this open-label, international, phase 3, randomised controlled trial, we recruited patients with relapsed or refractory mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome at 61 medical centres in the USA, Denmark, France, Italy, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, Japan, and Australia. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years (in Japan, ≥20 years), had failed (for progression or toxicity as assessed by the principal investigator) at least one previous systemic therapy, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 1 or less and adequate haematological, hepatic, and renal function. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive voice web response system to mogamulizumab (1·0 mg/kg intravenously on a weekly basis for the first 28-day cycle, then on days 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles) or vorinostat (400 mg daily). Stratification was by cutaneous T-cell lymphoma subtype (mycosis fungoides vs Sézary syndrome) and disease stage (IB-II vs III-IV). Since this study was open label, patients and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by investigator assessment in the intention-to-treat population. Patients who received one or more doses of study drug were included in the safety analyses. This study is ongoing, and enrolment is complete. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01728805., Findings: Between Dec 12, 2012, and Jan 29, 2016, 372 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive mogamulizumab (n=186) or vorinostat (n=186), comprising the intention-to-treat population. Two patients randomly assigned to mogamulizumab withdrew consent before receiving study treatment; thus, 370 patients were included in the safety population. Mogamulizumab therapy resulted in superior investigator-assessed progression-free survival compared with vorinostat therapy (median 7·7 months [95% CI 5·7-10·3] in the mogamulizumab group vs 3·1 months [2·9-4·1] in the vorinostat group; hazard ratio 0·53, 95% CI 0·41-0·69; stratified log-rank p<0·0001). Grade 3-4 adverse events of any cause were reported in 75 (41%) of 184 patients in the mogamulizumab group and 76 (41%) of 186 patients in the vorinostat group. The most common serious adverse events of any cause were pyrexia in eight (4%) patients and cellulitis in five (3%) patients in the mogamulizumab group; and cellulitis in six (3%) patients, pulmonary embolism in six (3%) patients, and sepsis in five (3%) patients in the vorinostat group. Two (67%) of three on-treatment deaths with mogamulizumab (due to sepsis and polymyositis) and three (33%) of nine on-treatment deaths with vorinostat (two due to pulmonary embolism and one due to bronchopneumonia) were considered treatment-related., Interpretation: Mogamulizumab significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with vorinostat, and could provide a new, effective treatment for patients with mycosis fungoides and, importantly, for Sézary syndrome, a subtype that represents a major therapeutic challenge in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma., Funding: Kyowa Kirin., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.