Search

Background: We investigated whether extended arterial grafting with three or more arterial grafts in patients with a left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending artery graft improves survival in coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients and whether its effects will depend on the extent of coronary artery disease; specifically three-vessel disease (3VD) versus two-vessel disease (2VD)., Methods: Fifteen-year mortality was analyzed in 11,931 patients with multivessel disease and primary isolated left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending artery coronary artery bypass graft surgery with 2 or more grafts. Patients were aged 64.3 ± 10.5 years; 3,484 (29.2%) were women; 2,532 (21.2%) had 2VD and 9,399 (78.8%) had 3VD. Patients were grouped into one single-artery group (n = 6,782, 56.9%; reference group), and two multiple artery groups: two arteries (n = 3,678, 30.8%) and three arteries (n = 1,471, 12.3%). Long-term survival was compared by Kaplan-Meier estimates. Risk-adjusted mortality hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were derived by covariate adjusted Cox regression to quantify multiple artery effects versus one artery in the overall cohort and separately among patients with 2VD and 3VD., Results: Radial artery (94%) and right internal thoracic artery (6%) conduits were used for additional arterial grafts. For the entire multivessel cohort, increasing number of arterial grafts was associated with incrementally improved 15-year survival (two arteries HR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.78 to 0.92; three arteries HR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.65 to 0.85). The three arteries versus two arteries comparison was consistent, even if not significant (HR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.03). The benefits derived from additional arterial grafts were more pronounced in case of 3VD (two arteries HR 0.84 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.92; three arteries HR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.84), without survival benefit with 2VD., Conclusions: Our results support the use of extended arterial grafting to maximize long-term coronary artery bypass graft surgery patient survival, especially for 3VD patients., (Copyright © 2018 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Multiarterial coronary grafting with two arterial grafts leads to improved survival compared with conventional single artery based on left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending artery and saphenous vein grafts. We investigated whether extending arterial grafting to three or more arterial grafts further improves survival, and whether such a benefit is modified by diabetes mellitus., Methods: We analyzed 15-year coronary artery bypass graft surgery mortality data in 11,931 patients (age 64.3 ± 10.5 years; 3,484 women [29.2%]; 4,377 [36.7%] with diabetes mellitus) derived from three US institutions (1994 to 2011). All underwent primary isolated left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending artery grafting with at least two grafts: one artery (n = 6,782; 56.9%); two arteries (n = 3,678; 30.8%); or three or more arteries (n = 1,471; 12.3%). Long-term survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods. Propensity score matching and comprehensive covariate adjustment (Cox regression) were used to derive long-term risk-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for increasing number of arterial grafts in the overall cohort and for diabetes and no-diabetes cohorts., Results: Radial artery (94%) and right internal thoracic artery (6%) were used as additional arterial grafts. Multivariate analysis in all patients showed that diabetes was associated with decreased survival (HR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.34 to 53), whereas increasing number of arterial grafts was associated with decreased mortality (one artery HR 1.0 [reference]; two arteries HR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.95; and three arteries HR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.95). Pairwise comparisons also showed an incremental benefit of additional arterial grafts: two arteries versus one artery, HR 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80 to 0.98); and three arteries versus one artery, HR 0.80 (95% CI: 0.68 to 0.94). A three-artery versus two-artery survival advantage trend was also noted, but was not significant in either the overall study cohort (HR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.75 to 1.07), the diabetes cohort (HR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.60 to 1.03), or the no-diabetes cohort (HR 01.00, 95% CI: 0.79 to 1.26). Among diabetes patients, the survival advantage of two arteries versus one artery was modest (HR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.72 to 1.11), whereas it was significant for three arteries versus one artery (HR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.58 to 0.96). Analyses of propensity matched subcohorts were also consistent., Conclusions: Increasing number of arterial grafts improves long-term survival and supports extended use of arterial grafts in coronary artery bypass graft surgery, irrespective of diabetes status., (Copyright © 2018 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Recent evidence shows that multi-arterial coronary artery bypass grafting (MABG) based on bilateral internal thoracic (BITA) or left internal thoracic (LITA) and radial artery (RA) improves long-term outcomes compared with single arterial coronary artery bypass grafting (SABG) (LITA + saphenous vein graft). How this evidence affected the worldwide use of MABG, if at all, is not well defined. Accordingly, we report 10-year temporal trends of MABG utilization from 2 continents. A study population of 1,683,434 non-emergent, primary, isolated LITA-based coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (≥2 grafts) patients was derived from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) (1,307,528 (79.5%) of 1,644,388 isolated CABG; total 1179 centers) and the Australia New Zealand Cardiothoracic (ANZ) Databases (34,213 (87%) of 39,046 isolated CABG; 24 centers) between 2004 and 2014. Patients were excluded based on the following: (1) no LITA, (2) if arterial grafts were other than RA or ITA, or (3) if grafting data were missing. The 3 MABG groups were LITA + RA, BITA, and BITA + RA, each with or without supplemental vein grafts. Grafting trends and their associated patient demographics were analyzed. SABG (89.3% STS, 51.4% ANZ) was the most common grafting strategy. MABG was most frequently accomplished by LITA + RA: (STS: 6.1%; ANZ: 42.6%), followed by BITA: (STS: 4.1%; ANZ: 4.3%), while ≥3 (BITA + RA) was rare in the STS (0.5%), but more common in ANZ (5.9%). In the STS, between 2004 and 2014, SABG rates systematically increased from 85.2% to 91.7%, BITA grafting was essentially unchanged from 3.6% to 4.3%, while RA use decreased systematically from 10.5% to 3.7%. In the ANZ, SABG rates increased from 17.3% to 51.4%, BITA grafting decreased from 6.3% to 3.6%, while RA grafting decreased from 65.8% to 39.0%. Compared with SABG patients, BITA patients were younger (STS: median age 59 vs 66, P < 0.001; ANZ: mean age 62 vs 68, P < 0.001), predominately male (STS: 84% vs 73%, P < 0.001; ANZ: 86% vs 79%, P < 0.001), less obese (body mass index >30 kg/m 2 ) in STS (37% vs 42%, P < 0.001), more obese in ANZ (33% vs 32%, P = 0.001), and less diabetic (STS: 26% vs 43%, P < 0.001; ANZ: 25% vs 37%, P < 0.001), whereas RA patients were intermediate in age (STS: 61; ANZ: 65), in male sex (STS: 82%; ANZ: 81%), in the prevalence of diabetes (STS: 40%; ANZ: 34%), and were most obese (STS: 47%; ANZ: 34%). A decade-long analysis of STS data reveals a counterintuitive decline in the use (driven by decreasing RA use) of MABG: a potentially superior grafting strategy compared with SABG. In contra distinction, the smaller but growing ANZ data document a distinctly different CABG practice pattern, with a higher MABG utilization rate, but a similarly declining RA use. The reasons for these practice patterns and declining MABG are likely diverse and require further assessment., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)