Search

Introduction: This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence between BP02 (a proposed trastuzumab biosimilar) and the reference trastuzumab approved in the EU (EU-trastuzumab) and the US (US-trastuzumab). Methods: In this phase 1, double-blind, parallel-group trial, 111 healthy male volunteers were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a single 6-mg/kg intravenous infusion of BP02, EU-trastuzumab, or US-trastuzumab and were evaluated for 78 days. Serum drug concentration–time data were analyzed by non-compartmental methods. The PK similarity of BP02 to the two reference products, and between EU-trastuzumab and US-trastuzumab, was determined using the standard 80–125% bioequivalence criteria. Results: Baseline demographics for the 111 subjects with evaluable pharmacokinetics were similar across all treatment groups. PK profiles were similar for the three products. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratios of area under the serum concentration–time curve (AUC) from the time of dosing to infinity (AUC0-inf), AUC from the time of dosing until the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t), and peak serum concentration of trastuzumab (Cmax) were within 80% to 125% for all three pairwise comparisons. Adverse events (AEs) were similar across all arms, with treatment-related AEs reported by 73.0%, 73.0%, and 89.2% of the subjects in the BP02, EU-trastuzumab, and US-trastuzumab groups, respectively. The most common AEs were headache, infusion-related reactions, and upper-respiratory-tract infections. Four subjects—three in the US-trastuzumab group and one in the BP02 group—discontinued the study due to AEs. All post-dose samples except for two tested negative for anti-drug antibodies. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the PK similarity among BP02, EU-trastuzumab, and US-trastuzumab. The safety and immunogenicity profiles observed for the three products in this study are consistent with previous reports for trastuzumab. Trial Registration: ANZCTR number: ACTRN12621000573853. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiovascular diseases are a leading cause of mortality in the United States. The increasing number of cancer patients experiencing cardiovascular side effects from chemotherapeutic drugs is a cause for concern. Trastuzumab is a highly effective targeted therapy for HER2-positive cancers but its use is limited globally due to its cardiotoxic effects. The most severe adverse effect is cardiomyopathy, which is characterized by contractile dysfunction and reduced left ventricular systolic function. The electrophysiological side effects of trastuzumab are still not fully understood. Due to these life-threatening side effects, trastuzumab is routinely discontinued. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of trastuzumab-induced cardiomyopathy, including the mechanisms by which trastuzumab exerts its cardiotoxic effects, the clinical manifestations, diagnostic strategies, and potential interventions to protect the heart. By shedding light on the various aspects of this condition, we hope to emphasize the importance of early detection and effective management, as well as the urgent need for further research to optimize the balance between successful cancer treatment and cardiovascular well-being. Cardiologists, oncologists, and researchers are at the forefront of this critical intersection between oncology and cardiology, working collaboratively to enhance patient outcomes in the era of trastuzumab therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Many patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive metastatic breast cancer (HER2+ mBC) require subsequent lines of therapy (LOTs) after being treated with pertuzumab and trastuzumab-based regimens in the first line (1L). Although the efficacy of the second-line (2L) therapies has been demonstrated in clinical trials, the real-world effectiveness of these treatments is understudied. This retrospective cohort study assessed the real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with HER2+ mBC following 1L therapy with pertuzumab and trastuzumab-based regimens in the United States (US) during 2015–2019. Methods: Adults with HER2+ mBC in the US who initiated 1L pertuzumab and trastuzumab-based regimens between 01/01/2015 and 09/30/2019 and had ≥ 60 days of follow-up after 1L initiation were identified from the IQVIA Oncology Electronic Medical Records database. The regimens utilized in 2L following 1L pertuzumab and trastuzumab-based regimens were described. Median treatment duration and time to treatment failure were reported for 2L based on Kaplan–Meier analyses. Results: Of the 710 eligible patients who received pertuzumab and trastuzumab-based regimens in 1L (median age: 57.0 years [interquartile range: 48.0–65.0]; median follow-up: 20.3 months; median 1L duration: 15.3 months), 222 (31.3%) initiated 2L. The most common regimens in 2L were ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1)-based regimens (n = 159 [71.6%]), followed by lapatinib-based (n = 21 [9.5%]) and neratinib-based (n = 18 [8.1%]) regimens. The median treatment duration and time to treatment failure were 5.9 (95% CI: 5.0, 8.7) and 8.6 (7.3, 11.5) months, respectively, among patients initiating 2L, and 5.7 (4.7, 7.8) and 7.9 (6.5, 10.0) months among those receiving 2L T-DM1. Conclusions: Most patients with HER2+ mBC requiring additional treatments after 1L pertuzumab and trastuzumab-based regimens utilized T-DM1 in 2L during 2015–2019. The short median treatment duration and time to treatment failure highlight an unmet need that can potentially be fulfilled by recently approved treatment options. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study bridged pharmacokinetic, efficacy, and safety clinical trial data from Japan to a Western population using real‐world evidence (RWE) to investigate the antibody–drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T‐DXd) in the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐positive advanced gastric cancer. Using population pharmacokinetic and exposure–response (efficacy/safety) models, exposure–efficacy data from 117 patients and exposure–safety data from 158 patients in Japan who received T‐DXd 6.4 mg/kg as second‐line or later treatment were bridged to RWE including covariate information from 25 Western patients with HER2‐positive gastric cancer who received second‐line or later T‐DXd treatment. Pharmacokinetic simulations indicated that intact T‐DXd and released drug (DXd) steady‐state exposures were comparable between Western patients and patients from Japan; the Western/Japan ratio of exposure medians ranged from 0.82 (T‐DXd steady‐state minimum concentration) to 1.18 (DXd steady‐state maximum concentration). Exposure–efficacy simulations estimated a confirmed objective response rate of 28.6% (90% confidence interval, 20.8‐38.4) in real‐world Western patients versus 40.1% (90% confidence interval, 33.5‐47.0) in patients from Japan, possibly because of checkpoint inhibitor use in 4% versus 30% of patients, respectively. Western patients had a higher estimated rate of serious adverse events than patients from Japan (42.2% vs 34.6%); however, the rate of interstitial lung disease was lower (less than 10%) in Western patients. Overall, T‐DXd was predicted to have meaningful clinical activity and a manageable safety profile in Western patients with HER2‐positive gastric cancer. Using RWE, bridging analysis supported US approval of T‐DXd 6.4 mg/kg in advanced gastric cancer before a clinical trial was completed in Western patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE Cancer care-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions harm human health. Many cancer drugs are administered at greater-than-necessary doses, frequencies, and durations. Alternative dosing strategies may enable reductions in cancer care GHG emissions without compromising patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used streamlined life-cycle analysis in a case-control simulation to estimate the relative reductions in GHG emissions that would be expected to result from using each of three alternative dosing strategies of trastuzumab (6-month adjuvant treatment duration, once every 4-week dosing, and both) in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)1 breast cancer. Using primary data and conversion factors from the environmental science literature, we estimated per-patient relative reduction in GHG emissions and, using SEER data, health impacts (in terms of disability-adjusted life-years [DALYs] and excess mortality per kg CO2) on bystanders for each alternative dosing strategy. RESULTS Compared with the trastuzumab dosing strategy commonly used at baseline (12-month duration of adjuvant therapy and once every 3-week dosing in all settings), adoption of both 6-month adjuvant trastuzumab and once every 4-week trastuzumab dosing would reduce GHG emissions by 4.5%, 18.7%, and 14.6% in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic settings, respectively. We estimate that US-based adoption of alternative trastuzumab dosing would reduce annual DALYs and excess lives lost due to environmental impact of US-based trastuzumab therapy for HER21 breast cancer by 1.5 and 0.9, respectively. CONCLUSION Alternative dosing strategies may materially reduce the population health impacts of cancer care by reducing environmental impact. Regulatory decision making and health technology assessments should consider a treatment's environmental and population health impacts. Clinical trials of alternative dosing strategies are justified on the basis of environmental and population health impacts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The clinical efficacy and safety profile of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) have been demonstrated in previously treated patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low advanced breast cancer (BC). It is, however, necessary to evaluate the value of T-DXd considering both its clinical efficacy and its cost, given that it is high. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd versus chemotherapy in patients with previously treated HER2-low advanced BC. Methods: We used a partitioned survival model that included three mutually exclusive health states. The patients in the model were identified based on their clinical characteristics and outcomes from the DESTINY-Breast04. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the model's robustness. Subgroup analyses were also conducted. The measures included costs, life years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), incremental net health benefits (INHBs), and incremental net monetary benefits (INMBs). Results: The ICERs of T-DXd vs. chemotherapy were $83,892/QALY, $82,808/QALY, and $93,358/QALY in all HER2-low advanced BC patients, HER2-positive (HER2+) advanced BC patients and HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced BC patients, respectively. In one-way sensitivity analysis, the cost of T-DXd and hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were also identified as key drivers. If the price of T-DXd decreased to $17.00/mg, $17.13/mg, and $14.07/mg, it would be cost-effective at a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000/QALY in all HER2-low advanced BC patients, HER2+ advanced BC patients and HER2- advanced BC patients, respectively. At a WTP threshold of $100,000/QALY, the probability of T-DXd being cost-effective was 81.10%, 82.27%, and 73.78% compared to chemotherapy for all HER2-low advanced BC patients, HER2+ advanced BC patients and HER2- advanced BC patients, respectively. Most subgroups of patients with HER2+ disease had a cost-effectiveness probability of > 50%. Conclusion: From a third-party payer's perspective in the United States, the findings of the cost-effectiveness analysis revealed that, at the current price, T-DXd is a cost-effective alternative to chemotherapy for patients with prior HER2-low advanced BC, at WTP threshold of $100,000/QALY. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE On the basis of the results from CLEOPATRA, pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy is the first-line standard of care for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, discrepancies have been reported between clinical trial and real-world outcomes. We report real-world outcomes for patients with HER2-positive MBC treated with first-line pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and a taxane in routine clinical practice in the United States. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted using electronic health record-derived deidentified data from the Flatiron Health database. Patients were grouped according to the first taxane received (paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel or docetaxel). Median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (rwOS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Subgroup analyses were conducted in patients treated with docetaxel who met CLEOPATRA's key eligibility criteria. RESULTS We included 1,065 patients; 313 patients received paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel and 752 received docetaxel. Patients who received paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel were older, had a worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, and had more recurrent metastatic disease compared with the docetaxel group. After adjustment for potential confounders, similar median rwPFS (inverse probability of treatment weighted average treatment effect for the treated [IPTW-ATT] hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.3; P 5 .365) and rwOS (IPTW-ATT HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.58; P 5 .101) was observed between treatment groups. In the subgroup of CLEOPATRA-eligible patients, median rwPFS and rwOS were 16.9 months and 57.8 months, respectively. CONCLUSION There was no statistically significant difference in real-world outcomes between patients treated with paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel and those treated with docetaxel. Selecting patients using key CLEOPATRA eligibility criteria resulted in rwPFS and rwOS similar to those observed in CLEOPATRA, highlighting the importance of ensuring similar patient populations when comparing clinical trial and real-world data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE Biosimilars offer increased patient choice and potential cost-savings, compared with originator biologics. We studied 3 years of prescribed biologics among US physician practices to determine the relationship of practice type and payment source to oncology biosimilar use. METHODS We acquired biologic utilization data from 38 practices participating in PracticeNET. We focused on six biologics (bevacizumab, epoetin alfa, filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, rituximab, and trastuzumab) for the period from 2019 to 2021. We complemented our quantitative analysis with a survey of PracticeNET participants (prescribers and practice leaders) to reveal potential motivators and barriers to biosimilar use. We implemented logistic regression to evaluate the biosimilar use for each biologic, with covariates including time, practice type, and payment source, and accounted for clusters of practices. RESULTS Use of biosimilars increased over the 3-year period, reaching between 51% and 80% of administered doses by the fourth quarter of 2021, depending on the biologic. Biosimilar use varied by practice, with independent physician practices having higher use of biosimilars for epoetin alfa, filgrastim, rituximab, and trastuzumab. Compared with commercial health plans, Medicaid plans had lower biosimilar use for four biologics; traditional Medicare had lower use for five biologics. The average cost per dose decreased between 24% and 41%, dependent on the biologic. CONCLUSION Biosimilars have, through increased use, lowered the average cost per dose of the studied biologics. Biosimilar use differed by originator biologic, practice type, and payment source. There remains further opportunity for increases in biosimilar use among certain practices and payers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Recently, the DESTINY-Breast04 trial revealed that significant benefits in both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HER2-low advanced or metastatic breast cancer treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) compared with chemotherapy. The current study assessed the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd from the perspective of the United States payer. Methods: We developed a partitioned survival model to project the disease course of breast cancer. The OS and PFS data were derived from the DESTINY-Breast04 trial. We extrapolate the survival data beyond the follow-up time to assess the long-term survival prognosis. Direct medical costs and utility data were collected. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was the primary outcome that evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a therapy regimen. One-way sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were implemented to explore the uncertainty of outputs. Results: In the base-case, the ICUR of T-DXd versus chemotherapy is $346,571.8/QALY and $337,789.4/QALY for all patients group and hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) subgroup, respectively. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed that the hazard ratio of OS, the unit cost of T-DXd, and body weight had a relatively large impact on the base-case result. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that the likelihood that T-DXd was cost-effective is 14.5% and 12.6% for all patients group and HR+ subgroup, respectively. Conclusion: The cost-effectiveness analysis suggested that, at current price, trastuzumab deruxtecan is unlikely to be a preferred option for patients with HER2-low breast cancer at a threshold of $150,000/QALY from a US payer perspective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The DESTINY-Breast03 clinical trial demonstrated that trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) outperformed trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Considering the excessive cost of antibody-drug conjugates, the clinical value of T-DXd must be assessed by both its efficacy and cost. We compared the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd and T-DM1 for patients with HER2-positive mBC pretreated with anti-HER2 antibodies and a taxane from the perspectives of the United States (US) and China. Methods: A comprehensive Markov model based on the DESTINY-Breast03 phase III randomized clinical trial was used to compared the cost and effectiveness of T-DXd and T-DM1 for HER2-positive mBC. Data on direct medical cost and utilities were collected from published literatures. The recorded data included the costs, quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental net-health benefit (INHB). Sensitivity analysis was conducted to measure the potential uncertainty due to parameter variability. Additional subgroup cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. Results: Treatment of HER2-positive mBC with T-DXd gained 0.73 QALYs compared with T-DM1 strategy. The incremental cost was $59,942 in the US, with an ICER of $ 82,112/QALY and an INHB of 0.33 QALYs, respectively. In China, the incremental cost of T-DXd versus T-DM1 was $222,680, with an ICER of $305,041/QALY and a negative INHB of -5.18 QALYs. At willingness-topay (WTP) threshold of $150,000/QALY in the US and $37,653/QALY in China, the probability of T-DXd as the dominant option was 77.5 and 0.1%, respectively. The unit price of T-DXd greatly influenced the results according to one-way sensitivity analysis. To meet the 50% or 90% chance of being cost-effective, the estimated cost of T-DXd would need to be less than $17.24/mg and $12.06/mg in China, respectively. Conclusion: T-DXd is more cost-effective than T-DM1 for patients with HER2- positive mBC in the US, but not in China at current drug prices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The treatment of metastatic breast cancer (mBC) has evolved significantly in the past several years with the approval of new targeted agents. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), an antibody-drug conjugate with a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload, is a new addition to the class of therapies that target the human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) receptor. T-DXd was approved in the US in December 2019 for patients with HER2-positive metastatic or unresectable breast cancer who have received 2 or more prior anti-HER2–based regimens in the metastatic setting. In the DESTINY-Breast01 phase II trial (NCT03248492), T-DXd demonstrated high rates of durable responses in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-positive mBC, with a confirmed objective response rate of 62%, median duration of response of 18.2 months, and median progression-free survival of 19.4 months. In addition to efficacy, successful implementation of any new anticancer therapy includes learning how to prevent, monitor, and manage treatment-related adverse events. As T-DXd becomes more widely used, information can be gained from real-world clinical practices, institutional approaches, and the collaboration of multidisciplinary oncology teams who treat patients with T-DXd. This article reviews practical insights and management of nausea and vomiting, neutropenia, interstitial lung disease, risk of cardiotoxicity, and other adverse events associated with T-DXd administration from the perspective of health care providers who have experience utilizing T-DXd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Monoclonal antibodies like Herceptin play a pivotal role in modern therapeutics, with their glycosylation patterns significantly influencing their bioactivity. To characterize the N-glycan profile and their relative abundance in Herceptin, we employed two analytical methods: hydrophilic interaction chromatography with fluorescence detection (HILIC-FLD) for released glycans and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for glycopeptides. Our analysis included 21 European Union (EU)-Herceptin lots and 14 United States (US)-Herceptin lots. HILIC-FLD detected 25 glycan species, including positional isomers, revealing comparable chromatographic profiles for both EU and US lots. On the other hand, LC-MS/MS identified 26 glycoforms within the glycopeptide EEQYNSTYR. Both methods showed that a subset of glycans dominated the total abundance. Notably, EU-Herceptin lots with an expiration date of October 2022 exhibited increased levels of afucosylated and high mannose N-glycans. Our statistical comparisons showed that the difference in quantitative results between HILIC-FLD and LC-MS/MS is significant, indicating that the absolute quantitative values depend on the choice of the analytical method. However, despite these differences, both methods demonstrated a strong correlation in relative glycan proportions. This study contributes to the comprehensive analysis of Herceptin's glycosylation, offering insights into the influence of analytical methods on glycan quantification and providing valuable information for the biopharmaceutical industry. • Herceptin is used in the treatment of Her2-overexpressed breast cancer. • HILIC-FLD analysis of released glycans and LC-MS/MS analysis of glycopeptides methods were compared. • HILIC-FLD and LC-MS/MS are orthogonal analytical techniques for quantitative analysis of glycans. • HILIC-FLD is highly sensitive because it involves labeling released glycans with a fluorescent tag. • LC-MS/MS offers specificity because it can localize the glycosylation sites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Systemic therapies for metastatic biliary tract cancers are few, and patients have a median overall survival of less than 1 year. MyPathway evaluates the activity of US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies in non-indicated tumours with potentially actionable molecular alterations. In this study, we present an analysis of patients with metastatic biliary tract cancers with HER2 amplification, overexpression, or both treated with a dual anti-HER2 regimen, pertuzumab plus trastuzumab, from MyPathway.Methods: MyPathway is a non-randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 2a, multiple basket study. Patients aged 18 years and older with previously treated metastatic biliary tract cancers with HER2 amplification, HER2 overexpression, or both and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were enrolled from 23 study sites in the USA and received intravenous pertuzumab (840 mg loading dose, then 420 mg every 3 weeks) plus trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose, then 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. The primary outcome and adverse events were analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of pertuzumab and trastuzumab. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02091141, and is ongoing.Findings: 39 patients enrolled in the MyPathway HER2 biliary tract cancer cohort between Oct 28, 2014, and May 29, 2019, were evaluable for anti-tumour activity by the March 10, 2020, data cutoff date. Median follow-up was 8·1 months (IQR 2·7-15·7). Nine of 39 patients achieved a partial response (objective response rate 23% [95% CI 11-39]). Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 18 (46%) of 39 patients, most commonly increased alanine aminotransferase and increased aspartate aminotransferase (each five [13%] of 39). Treatment-related grade 3 adverse events were reported in three (8%) of 39 patients, including increased alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, blood alkaline phosphatase, and blood bilirubin. Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in ten (26%) of 39 patients, of which only abdominal pain occurred in more than one patient (two [5%] of 39). There were no treatment-related serious adverse events, treatment-related grade 4 events, or deaths.Interpretation: Treatment was well tolerated in patients with previously treated HER2-positive metastatic biliary tract cancer. The response rate is promising for the initiation of randomised, controlled trials of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in this patient population.Funding: F Hoffmann-La Roche-Genentech. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims In cancer patients with cardiomyopathy related to anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab, data regarding late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging are confusing. The prevalence ranges from 0% to 30% and the patterns are ill-defined. Whether treatment with anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab is associated with LGE is unclear. We aimed to investigate these topics in a large cohort of consecutive cancer patients with suspected cardiotoxicity from anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab. Methods and results We studied 298 patients, analysed the prevalence, patterns, and correlates of LGE, and determined their causes. We compared the findings with those from 100 age-matched cancer patients who received neither anthracyclines nor trastuzumab. Amongst those who received anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab, 31 (10.4%) had LGE. It had a wide range of extent (3.9–34.7%) and locations. An ischaemic pattern was present in 20/31 (64.5%) patients. There was an alternative explanation for the non-ischaemic LGE in 7/11 (63.6%) patients. In the age-matched patients who received neither anthracyclines nor trastuzumab, the prevalence of LGE was higher at 27.0%, while the extent of LGE and the proportion with ischaemic pattern were not different. Conclusion LGE was present in only a minority. Its patterns and locations did not fit into a single unique profile. It had alternative explanations in virtually all cases. Finally, LGE was also present in cancer patients who received neither anthracyclines nor trastuzumab. Therefore, treatment with anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab is unlikely to be associated with LGE. The absence of LGE can help distinguish anthracycline- and/or trastuzumab-related cardiomyopathy from unrelated cardiomyopathies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Guidelines regarding the usage of adjuvant systemic therapy in patients with small human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor–positive (luminal HER2 positive) tumors are nonspecific. Outcomes of chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy (ET), with or without anti-HER2 therapy, vs ET alone (no chemotherapy) have not been widely studied in this disease subtype. We sought to examine the usage and outcomes of adjuvant systemic therapy (ET vs chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab) in stage I luminal HER2-positive breast cancer (BC), based on the large National Cancer Database. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with luminal HER2-positive stage I BC, diagnosed between 2010 and 2015, in the United States, using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 37 777 patients were included in the analysis; of these, n = 32 594 (86%) received adjuvant ET and n = 5183 (14%) received chemotherapy. Around 40% of all patients received anti-HER2 therapy (trastuzumab). Patients who received trastuzumab had a better 5-year OS (93.4% vs 92.0%, P =.0002) compared with those who did not. Patients who received anti-HER2 therapy plus ET had the best OS rate at 5 years (93.5%, confidence interval [CI]: 89.2%-98%, P <.0001) compared with those receiving anti-HER2 therapy plus chemotherapy (92.7%, CI: 89.4%-96.1%, P <.0001). Conclusions: Most patients in the United States, with stage I luminal HER2 positive BC, received ET, not chemotherapy but most of them do not receive anti-HER2 therapy resulting in inferior outcome. Future trials exploring the de-escalation of systemic adjuvant therapy for early-stage luminal HER2-positive BC to ET plus anti-HER2 therapy would be desirable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody for patients with HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2)-positive breast cancer, which is added to regular treatment and reduces mortality. Originally, trastuzumab had to be administered intravenously (IV) over 30 min every 3 weeks for 1 year. Since 2012, a formulation for the subcutaneous (SC) administration of trastuzumab has been available, which has not yet been approved in the USA. Advocates claim that the SC formulation saves time and money, despite higher costs. The purpose of this study is to review existing literature concerning the comparative efficacy and risk of harms of trastuzumab IV and SC concerning patient-relevant health outcomes. Methods: We conducted searches in the Cochrane Library and MEDLINE for articles published through May 2018 in English or German. In addition, we searched ClinicalTrials.gov to identify unpublished studies. We dually reviewed the abstracts and full-text articles based on a priori defined inclusion criteria, rated the risk of bias of included studies, and assessed the strength of the evidence for each outcome of interest. Because data was insufficient for quantitative synthesis, we summarized results narratively. Results: We identified three RCTs (randomized controlled trials) meeting our eligibility criteria, which included data on 1003 patients. We found moderate evidence for similar event rates (20.05% vs. 18%, HR (hazard ratio) 0.88, CI 95% = 0.62–1.27), and mortality rates (10% vs. 8%, HR 0.76, CI 95% = 0.44–1.32) after 1.7 years for patients receiving trastuzumab IV and for patients receiving SC. Results remained similar after 3.3 years, though evidence lacked strength due to a high dropout rate. All trials reported more adverse events among the SC group than in the IV group. Evidence for these findings was of moderate strength. Nevertheless, more than 85% of the patients preferred trastuzumab SC over IV. Results concerning serious adverse events appeared to be heterogeneous. Conclusion: Results of studies indicate similar efficacy between the two routes of administration. The higher rates of adverse events for SC administration were mainly attributable to injection site–related events. The clinical decision of whether to administer trastuzumab SC or IV requires the consideration of several factors and should be determined individually. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To assess the cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab deruxtecan compared with trastuzumab emtansine as second-line therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive metastatic breast cancer from a US healthcare sector perspective., Methods: A 3-state partitioned survival model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab deruxtecan compared with trastuzumab emtansine. For both treatments, modeled patients were administered treatment intravenously every 3 weeks indefinitely or until disease progression. Transition parameters were principally derived from the updated DESTINY-Breast03 phase III randomized clinical trial. Costs include drug costs extracted from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services average sales price and administrative, adverse event, and third-line therapy costs derived from published literature, measured in 2022 US dollars. Health utilities for health states and disutilities for adverse events were sourced from published literature. Effects were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). We conducted both probabilistic sensitivity analysis and comprehensive scenario analysis to test model assumptions and robustness, while utilizing a lifetime horizon., Results: In our base-case analysis, total costs for trastuzumab deruxtecan were $1 266 945, compared with $820 082 for trastuzumab emtansine. Total QALYs for trastuzumab deruxtecan were 5.09, compared with 3.15 for trastuzumab emtansine. The base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $230 285/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that trastuzumab deruxtecan had an 11.1% probability of being cost-effective at a $100 000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold., Conclusions: Despite the higher efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive metastatic breast cancer, our findings raise concern regarding its value at current prices., Competing Interests: Author Disclosures Links to the individual disclosure forms provided by the authors are available here., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Payment for oncology care is increasingly moving from fee-for-service to value-based payment (VBP). VBPs are agreements in which providers are held accountable for total cost of care (TCOC) through risk-sharing arrangements with payers that tie reimbursement levels to TCOC benchmarks. Oncology biosimilars may play an important role in managing financial risk in the VBPs like Medicare's Oncology Care Model (OCM), but there has been limited research in this area. The objective of this study is to estimate the impact of biosimilar adoption on TCOC and oncology provider financial performance under the terms of the Medicare OCM., Methods: We conducted a population-based simulation study using the Medicare Limited Data Set (LDS) and the methodology of Medicare's OCM. The primary outcome was the simulated average change in TCOC per 6-month episode of care attributable to use of biosimilars as an alternative to reference products. The study population consisted of episodes of care in 2020 and using the reference product or corresponding biosimilar for bevacizumab, rituximab, trastuzumab, epoetin alfa, filgrastim, or pegfilgrastim. TCOC was calculated for each episode of care with use of reference products only and compared with TCOC with corresponding biosimilars. The simulation calculated TCOC outcomes in cohorts of 100 episodes sampled from the Medicare LDS study population using a Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 iterations., Results: Among the total of 8281 6-month oncology care episodes identified in the study period (initiating January 2020 to July 2020) in Medicare claims, 1586 (19.2%) episodes met OCM and study criteria and were included. Applying the simulation methods to these observed episodes, biosimilar substitution reduced mean TCOC per episode by $1193 (95% CI $583-1840). The cost reduction from biosimilars represented 2.4% of the average TCOC benchmark and led to a 15% reduction in the risk of providers needing to pay recoupments to Medicare for exceeding TCOC benchmarks., Conclusions: On the basis of our simulation study using observed Medicare claims and OCM criteria, we found that biosimilar substitution for reference products can significantly lower episode TCOC and improve provider financial performance under the terms of the largest value-based payment model implemented to date., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

For decades, pharmacotherapy has been hampered by significant patient variability, and the inability to predict outcomes at the individual patient level has negatively affected its value. However, progress in molecular medicine has led to an increased understanding of the pathophysiology and mechanisms of action of drugs, thereby enabling the development of predictive biomarkers. Companion diagnostics (CDx) belongs to the group of predictive biomarkers, which the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines as an in vitro diagnostic device that provides information that is essential for the safe and effective use of a corresponding therapeutic product. In September 1998, 25 years ago, the FDA approved the first CDx assay, the HercepTest, an immunohistochemical (IHC) assay for the detection of HER2 protein expression. This assay is linked to the use of the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab in the treatment of HER2 positive breast cancer. The HercepTest is not the only CDx developed. Currently, more than 60 drugs or drug combinations, primarily in hematology and oncology, have been approved by the FDA, with CDx assays linked to their use. The current article briefly discusses the subject of CDx and provides an overview of its evolution over the past 25 years, with particular emphasis on the United States.

Purpose: Black women often experience poorer breast cancer-related outcomes and higher mortality than white women. A contributor to this disparity may relate to the disproportionate burden of cancer treatment-related cardiovascular (CV) toxicities. The objective of this review is to identify studies that report racial differences in CV toxicity risk., Methods: Medline and Embase were searched for studies that assessed CV toxicities as the outcome(s) and included Black and White women with breast cancer. Studies were selected based on inclusion/exclusion criteria and through the use of multiple reviewers., Results: The review included 13 studies following a review of 409 citations and 49 full-text articles. All studies were retrospective and 8/13 utilized data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database. Trastuzumab was the most frequently studied treatment. The proportion of Black women in these studies ranged from 5.5 to 63%. A majority of studies reported a higher risk of CV toxicity amongst Black women when compared to white women (93%). Black women had up to a two times higher risk of CV toxicity (HR, 2.73 (CI, 1.24 to 6.01)) compared to white women. Only one study evaluated the role of socioeconomic factors in explaining racial differences in CV toxicity; however, the disparity remained even after adjusting for these factors., Conclusions: There is a critical need for more longitudinal studies that evaluate multilevel factors (e.g., psychosocial, biological) that may help to explain this disparity., Implications for Cancer Survivors: Black cancer survivors may require additional surveillance and mitigation strategies to decrease disproportionate burden of CV toxicities., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: SB3 has been developed as a trastuzumab biosimilar, a therapeutic monoclonal antibody targeted to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and approved by the European Commission and United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA). During the developmental period of a biosimilar, setting an appropriate quality target is critical for assessing the similarity of the biosimilar product to the reference product. A stepwise approach should be taken to assessing similarity, beginning with extensive characterization of the reference product to establish the quality target. Objective: In this study, we evaluated the similarity of SB3 to the reference product and the impact of changes in the biological profile of the reference product on similarity assessment. Methods: Analytical similarity was assessed with defined test procedures in terms of critical quality attributes (CQAs) that could affect efficacy, potency, and safety, as well as for the non-CQAs that are related to process consistency. The quality target was established using up to 154 lots of European Union (EU)- and US-sourced Herceptin® (reference product), analyzed during the developmental period of SB3. Results: Trends of the EU- and US-sourced reference product showed that the biological profile exhibited two marked changes for Fc-related attributes, and then recovered to pre-change quality level. Since the similarity range set by pre-change lots was considered most relevant, the changed lots were excluded from establishing the similarity range, which resulted in tightened acceptance criteria. As shown in the results of similarity assessment using the stringent quality target ranges, SB3 exhibits highly similar functional activities compared to the reference product in terms of both CQAs and non-CQAs. Conclusion: SB3 has been developed as a trastuzumab biosimilar approved in the EU and USA, and its manufacturing process is deemed to be robust and well-controlled within stringent quality target ranges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: ABP 980 has been developed as a biosimilar to Herceptin® (trastuzumab). Comprehensive analytical characterization incorporating orthogonal analytical techniques was used to compare ABP 980 to trastuzumab reference products sourced from the United States (US) and the European Union (EU). Methods: Physicochemical property comparisons included the following: primary structure related to amino acid sequence and post-translational modifications, including glycans; higher-order structure; product-related substances and impurities, including size and charge variants; subvisible and submicron particles, and protein content. In addition, functional similarity was assessed for Fab-mediated, Fc-mediated, and combined Fab- and Fc-mediated activities. Results: ABP 980 has the same amino acid sequence as and similar post-translational modification profiles to trastuzumab (US) and trastuzumab (EU). Importantly, ABP 980 was found to be highly similar to trastuzumab for all functional activities related to the mechanism(s) of action. Higher-order structure, product-related substances and impurities, particles and aggregates were also highly similar between ABP 980 and trastuzumab. Where minor differences were noted, they were evaluated and found unlikely to impact clinical performance. The totality of evidence, including the pharmacokinetic clinical similarity of ABP 980, further supports that ABP 980 is highly similar to trastuzumab. Conclusion: Based on the comprehensive analytical similarity assessment, ABP 980 is analytically highly similar to the reference product, trastuzumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a) is a novel HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate with a humanised anti-HER2 antibody, cleavable peptide-based linker, and topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. A phase 1, non-randomised, open-label, multiple-dose study was done to assess the safety, tolerability, and activity of trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-expressing advanced solid tumours. The dose escalation (part 1) has previously been reported and the recommended doses for expansion of 5·4 mg/kg or 6·4 mg/kg were established. In this Article, we report the safety and preliminary activity results from this phase 1 trial in all patients with HER2-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer who received trastuzumab deruxtecan at the recommended doses for expansion.Methods: This was an open-label, dose-escalation and dose-expansion phase 1 trial done at eight hospitals and clinics in the USA and six in Japan. Eligible patients were at least 18 years old in the USA and at least 20 years old in Japan and had advanced solid tumours (regardless of HER2 expression in dose escalation or HER2 expression or mutation in dose expansion). The recommended doses for expansion of 5·4 mg/kg or 6·4 mg/kg trastuzumab deruxtecan were administered intravenously to patients once every 3 weeks until withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, or progressive disease. In this Article, all patients with HER2-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer with previous trastuzumab treatment who received trastuzumab deruxtecan were analysed together. The primary endpoints of the study were safety and preliminary activity (proportion of patients who achieved an objective response as assessed by the investigators). The activity evaluable set included all patients who received at least one dose of trastuzumab deruxtecan at the recommended doses for expansion, and for whom both baseline and post-treatment activity data were available. The safety analysis set included all patients who received at least one dose of trastuzumab deruxtecan at the recommended doses for expansion. Enrolment for patients with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer has completed. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02564900, and ClinicalTrials.jp, number JapicCTI-152978.Findings: Between Aug 28, 2015, and Aug 10, 2018, 44 patients with HER2-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer received at least one dose of trastuzumab deruxtecan at the recommended doses for expansion. All patients had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. The most frequent grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events included anaemia (13 [30%]) and decreases in neutrophil (nine [20%]), platelet (eight [18%]), and white blood cell (seven [16%]) counts. Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 11 (25%) patients. There were four pneumonitis cases (three grade 2 and one grade 3). There were no drug-related deaths due to treatment-emergent adverse events. 19 (43·2%; 95% CI 28·3-59·0) of 44 patients had a confirmed objective response.Interpretation: Trastuzumab deruxtecan had a manageable safety profile and showed preliminary activity in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. These results support further investigation of trastuzumab deruxtecan for HER2-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer post-trastuzumab.Funding: Daiichi Sankyo Co, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a) is a novel HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate with a humanised anti-HER2 antibody, cleavable peptide-based linker, and potent topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. A phase 1, non-randomised, open-label, multiple-dose study was done to assess the safety, tolerability, and activity of trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-expressing, advanced solid tumours. The dose escalation (part 1) has previously been reported and the recommended doses for expansion of 5·4 mg/kg or 6·4 mg/kg were established. In this Article, we report the safety and preliminary activity results from this phase 1 trial in all patients with HER2-positive advanced-stage breast cancer with previous trastuzumab emtansine treatment who received trastuzumab deruxtecan at the recommended doses for expansion.Methods: We did an open-label, dose-escalation and dose-expansion phase 1 trial at eight hospitals and clinics in the USA and six in Japan. Eligible patients were at least 18 years old in the USA and at least 20 years of age in Japan and had advanced solid tumours (regardless of HER2 expression in dose escalation or HER2 expression or mutation in dose expansion). The recommended doses for expansion of 5·4 mg/kg or 6·4 mg/kg trastuzumab deruxtecan were administered intravenously to patients once every 3 weeks until withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, or progressive disease. In this Article, all patients with HER2-positive advanced-stage breast cancer with previous trastuzumab emtansine treatment who received trastuzumab deruxtecan at the recommended doses for expansion were analysed together. The primary endpoints of the study were safety and preliminary activity (proportion of patients who achieved an objective response as assessed by the investigators). The activity evaluable set included all patients who received at least one dose of trastuzumab deruxtecan at the recommended doses for expansion, and for whom both baseline and post-treatment activity data were available. The safety analysis set included all patients who received at least one dose of trastuzumab deruxtecan at the recommended doses for expansion. Enrolment for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer has been completed. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02564900, and ClinicalTrials.jp, number JapicCTI-152978.Findings: Between Aug 28, 2015, and Aug 10, 2018, 115 of 118 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer were treated with at least one dose of trastuzumab deruxtecan at the recommended doses for expansion. All patients had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. Frequent grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events included anaemia (19 [17%] of 115) and decreased neutrophil (16 [14%]), white blood cell (ten [9%]), and platelet (nine [8%]) counts. At least one serious treatment-emergent adverse event occurred for 22 (19%) patients. Investigators reported 20 cases of interstitial lung disease, pneumonitis, or organising pneumonia, including one grade 3 event and two treatment-related deaths due to pneumonitis. One death unrelated to study treatment was due to progressive disease. 66 (59·5%; 95% CI 49·7-68·7) of 111 patients had a confirmed objective response.Interpretation: Trastuzumab deruxtecan had a manageable safety profile and showed preliminary activity in trastuzumab emtansine-pretreated patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. These results suggest that further development in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials for HER2-positive breast cancer is warranted.Funding: Daiichi Sankyo Co, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The APHINITY trial assessed the effectiveness and the safety of adding pertuzumab to trastuzumab and chemotherapy (THP) compared to trastuzumab and chemotherapy (TH) in the adjuvant management of human epidermal growth factor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. We performed a study to project the potential cost-effectiveness of THP vs. TH.Study Design: Trial-based cost-utility modeling analysis.Methods: We performed an economic evaluation from a payer perspective using a Markov model with six health states: invasive disease-free survival, non-metastatic recurrence, remission, first-line metastatic, subsequent line metastatic, and death. We parameterized the model using data from both arms in APHINITY extrapolated to a patient's lifetime horizon. Estimates of health state utilities were based on EQ-5D trial data and the literature, and costs were estimated from government sources and the published literature. The primary outcomes of the model were life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Uncertainty was addressed via univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.Results: For the intention-to-treat population, the model projected improved outcomes (by 0.50 LYs and 0.45 QALYs) and increased costs (by $74 420) for ICERs of $147 774/LY gained and $167 185/QALY gained for PHT vs. HT patients. In the node-positive patient population, the model projected improved outcomes (by 0.86 LYs and 0.76 QALYs) and increased costs (by $66 647) for ICERs of $77 684/LY gained and $87 929/QALY gained. For the hormone-receptor-negative patient population, the model projected health gains, increased costs, and ICERs of $147 022/LY gained and $166 518/QALY gained. The results were sensitive to changes in the model time horizon.Conclusion: The addition of pertuzumab to the available regimens for HER2+ early breast cancer is likely to be cost-effective for patients in the U.S. at high risk of recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Therapies targeting HER2 have improved clinical outcomes in HER2-positive breast and gastric cancers, and are emerging as potential treatments for HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer. MyPathway evaluates the activity of targeted therapies in non-indicated tumour types with potentially predictive molecular alterations. We aimed to assess the activity of pertuzumab and trastuzumab in patients with HER2-amplified metastatic colorectal cancer.Methods: MyPathway is an ongoing, phase 2a, multiple basket study. Patients in this subset analysis were aged 18 years or older and had treatment-refractory, histologically confirmed HER2-amplified metastatic colorectal cancer with measurable or evaluable disease and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or less, enrolled from 25 hospitals or clinics in 16 states of the USA. Patients received pertuzumab (840 mg loading dose, then 420 mg every 3 weeks, intravenously) and trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose, then 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks, intravenously). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved an objective response based on investigator-reported tumour responses. Analyses were done per protocol. This ongoing trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02091141.Findings: Between Oct 20, 2014, and June 22, 2017, 57 patients with HER2-amplified metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled in the MyPathway study and deemed eligible for inclusionin this cohort analysis. Among these 57 evaluable patients, as of Aug 1, 2017, one (2%) patient had a complete response and 17 (30%) had partial responses; thus overall 18 of 57 patients achieved an objective response (32%, 95% CI 20-45). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were diarrhoea (19 [33%] of 57 patients), fatigue (18 [32%] patients), and nausea (17 [30%] patients). Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded in 21 (37%) of 57 patients, most commonly hypokalaemia and abdominal pain (each three [5%] patients). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in ten (18%) patients and two (4%) of these adverse events (ie, chills and infusion-related reaction) were considered treatment related. There were no treatment-related deaths.Interpretation: Dual HER2-targeted therapy with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab is well tolerated and could represent a therapeutic opportunity for patients with heavily pretreated, HER2-amplified metastatic colorectal cancer.Funding: F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: HER2-targeted treatments have improved outcomes in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic settings; however, some patients remain at risk of relapse or death for many years after treatment of early-stage disease. Therefore, new strategies are needed. We did a phase 3 trial to assess a neoadjuvant regimen for HER2-positive breast cancer that replaces traditional systemic chemotherapy with targeted treatment.Methods: We did a randomised, open-label phase 3 KRISTINE trial in 68 Translational Research In Oncology centres (hospitals and specialty cancer centres in Asia, Europe, USA, and Canada). Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older with centrally confirmed HER2-positive stage II-III operable breast cancer (>2 cm tumour size), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and a baseline left ventricular ejection fraction of at least 55% (by echocardiogram or multiple-gated acquisition scan). We randomly assigned participants (1:1) to receive either trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab or docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab plus pertuzumab. We did the randomisation via an interactive response system under a permuted block randomisation scheme (block size of four), stratified by hormone receptor status, stage at diagnosis, and geographical location. Patients received six cycles (every 3 weeks) of neoadjuvant trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab (trastuzumab emtansine 3·6 mg/kg; pertuzumab 840 mg loading dose, 420 mg maintenance doses) or docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab plus pertuzumab (docetaxel 75 mg/m2; carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve 6 mg/mL × min; trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose, 6 mg/kg maintenance doses) plus pertuzumab [same dosing as in the other group]). All treatments were administered intravenously. The primary objective was to compare the number of patients who achieved a pathological complete response (ypT0/is, ypN0), between groups in the intention-to-treat population (two-sided assessment), based on local evaluation of tumour samples taken at breast cancer surgery done between 14 days and 6 weeks after completion of neoadjuvant therapy. Safety was analysed in patients who received at least one dose of study medication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02131064, and follow-up of the adjuvant phase is ongoing.Findings: Between June 25, 2014, and June 15, 2015, we randomly assigned 444 patients to neoadjuvant treatment with trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab (n=223) or docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab plus pertuzumab (n=221). A pathological complete response was achieved by 99 (44·4%) of 223 patients in the trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab group and 123 (55·7%) of 221 patients in the docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab plus pertuzumab group (absolute difference -11·3 percentage points, 95% CI -20·5 to -2·0; p=0·016). During neoadjuvant treatment, compared with patients receiving docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab plus pertuzumab, fewer patients receiving trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab had a grade 3-4 adverse event (29 [13%] of 223 vs 141 [64%] of 219) or a serious adverse event (11 [5%] of 223 vs 63 [29%] of 219). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events in the trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab group were decreased platelet count (three [1%] of 223 patients vs 11 [5%] of 219 with docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab plus pertuzumab), fatigue (three [1%] vs seven [3%]), alanine aminotransferase increase (three [1%] vs four [2%]), and hypokalaemia (three [1%] vs five [2%]). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events in the docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab plus pertuzumab group were neutropenia (55 [25%] of 219 vs one [<1%] of 223 with trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab), diarrhoea (33 [15%] vs 2 [<1%]), and febrile neutropenia (33 [15%] vs 0). No deaths were reported during neoadjuvant treatment.Interpretation: Traditional neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy plus dual HER2-targeted blockade (docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab plus pertuzumab) resulted in significantly more patients achieving a pathological complete response than HER2-targeted chemotherapy plus HER2-targeted blockade (trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab); however, numerically more grade 3-4 and serious adverse events occurred in the chemotherapy plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab group. Further efforts to improve the efficacy of chemotherapy without imparting more toxicity are warranted.Funding: F Hoffmann-La Roche and Genentech. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The cost of cancer drugs forms a rising proportion of health care budgets worldwide. A number of studies have examined international comparisons of initial cost, but there is little work on postlicensing price increases. To examine this, we compared cancer drug prices at initial sale andsubsequent price inflation in the United States and UnitedKingdom and also reviewed relevant price control mechanisms. Methods The 10 top-selling cancer drugs were selected, and their prices at initial launch and in 2015 were compared. Standard nondiscounted prices were obtained from the relevant annual copies of the RED BOOK and the British National Formulary. Results At initial marketing, prices were on average 42% higher in the United States than in the United Kingdom. After licensing in the United States, all 10 drugs had price rises averaging an overall annual 8.8% (range, 1.4% to 24.1%) increase. In comparison, in the United Kingdom, six drugs had unchanged prices, two had decreased prices, and two had modest price increases. The overall annual increase in the United Kingdom was 0.24%. Conclusion Cancer drug prices are rising substantially, both at their initial marketing price and, in the United States, at postlicensing prices. In the United Kingdom, the Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme, an agreement between the government and the pharmaceutical industry, controls health care costs while allowing a return on investment and funds for research. The increasing costs of cancer drugs are approaching the limits of sustainability, and a similar government-industry agreement may allow stability for both health care provision and the pharmaceutical industry in the United States. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Medicare currently enrolls ≥ 45 million adults, and by 2030 this is projected to increase to ≥ 80 million beneficiaries. With this growth, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposal, the Medicare Part B Drug Payment Model, to shrinkdrug expenditures, a major contributor to overall health care costs. For this to not adversely affect patient outcomes, lower-cost alternative medications with equivalent efficacy and no increased toxicity must be available. This is often not true in the treatment of cancer. Herein, we examine the flaws in the rationale of the CMS and the potential unintended consequences of this experiment. Methods We identified the top three oncology expenditures (rituximab, bevacizumab, and trastuzumab) and their vetted alternatives (per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines) to ascertain whether lower-cost equivalent alternatives are available. Drug cost was based on April 2016 average sale price. We explored both efficacy of the agents and, when applicable, toxicity to compare alternatives to these high-dollar medications. Results For the largest Medicare oncology drug expenditures, there is not a lower-cost option with equal efficacy for their primary indications. Without lower-cost alternatives, the unintended consequence of this CMS experiment may include curtailing access to care or an increase in patient/program costs. Conclusion The CMS proposal, by simply lowering reimbursement for drugs, does not acknowledge the value of these agents and could unintentionally reduce quality of care. Alternative approaches to value-based care, such as the Oncology Care Model and similar frameworks, should be explored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: HLX02, the first China-manufactured trastuzumab biosimilar, is approved in Europe (EU) and China. This study evaluated bioequivalence between HLX02 and US-approved trastuzumab (US-trastuzumab)., Method: In this double-blind, parallel-group, Phase I study, healthy Chinese men were randomized (1:1:1) to receive a single 6 mg/kg dose of HLX02, reference US-trastuzumab, or reference EU-approved trastuzumab (EU-trastuzumab). Equivalence in PK profiles was demonstrated if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratio (GMR) for the difference between the least square means of the area under the curve (AUC) from time 0 to infinity (AUC ∞ ) were 0.8-1.25., Results: Pharmacokinetic profiles of the three trastuzumab products were similar in 111 Chinese men. Equivalence was confirmed between HLX02 and US-trastuzumab (GMR for AUC ∞ 1.009, 90% CI 0.950-1.072); HLX02 and EU-trastuzumab (GMR for AUC ∞ 1.068, 90% CI 1.005-1.135); and EU- and US-trastuzumab (GMR for AUC ∞ 0.945, 90% CI 0.889-1004). Exploratory analysis of all other PK parameters also demonstrated equivalence between any two of the three trastuzumab products. HLX02 had similar safety and immunogenicity profiles to US- and EU-trastuzumab., Conclusion: HLX02 is bioequivalent to US-trastuzumab and EU-trastuzumab, with similar safety and immunogenicity profiles. US- and EU-trastuzumab were also bioequivalent to each other.

Background: By 8 September 2022, 10 biological monoclonal antibody (mAb) biosimilar products for cancer treatment had been approved and marketed in the United States (US). This study examined adverse event (AE) reporting patterns and disproportionate reporting signals for mAb biosimilars in the US compared to their originator biologics., Research Design and Methods: The US Food and Drug Adverse Event Reporting System database was used to identify AE reports for biological rituximab, bevacizumab, trastuzumab, and their marketed biosimilars. Proportions of patient age, sex and type of reporters of AEs were described for these reports. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated to compare reporting disproportionality in serious, death, and specific AEs between mAb biologics/biosimilars (index) and all other drugs. Breslow-Day statistic was used to determine homogeneity in RORs between each mAb biologic-biosimilar pair at p < 0.05., Results: We observed no risk signals of serious or death AE reporting for all three mAb biosimilars. A signal of disproportionate reporting of death was detected between biological and biosimilar bevacizumab (p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Our findings support the similarity in signals of disproportionate AE reporting between mAb originator biologics and biosimilars, except for death between biological and biosimilar bevacizumab.

Purpose: The US Food and Drug Administration approved fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (DS-8201a, T-DXd) for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low (immunohistochemistry 1 + or immunohistochemistry 2+/in situ hybridization-) breast cancer who have received a prior chemotherapy in the metastatic setting or developed disease recurrence during or within 6 months of completing adjuvant chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: Approval was based on DESTINY-Breast04, a phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial in patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-low breast cancer, determined at a central laboratory. A total of 557 patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks (n = 373) or physicians' choice of chemotherapy (n = 184)., Results: The study met its primary efficacy end point of progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review assessment in the hormone receptor-positive (HR+) cohort (N = 494) with an estimated hazard ratio (HR) of 0.51(95% CI, 0.40 to 0.64; P < .0001). Key secondary end points were also met, including PFS in the intent-to-treat population with an HR of 0.50 (95% CI, 0.40 to 0.63; P < .0001), overall survival (OS) in the HR+ cohort with an HR of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.48 to 0.86; P = .0028) and OS in the intent-to-treat with an HR of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.84; P = .0010). The safety profile of T-DXd was consistent with previously approved indications, and no new safety signals were observed in this study population., Conclusion: The approval of T-DXd in HER2-low metastatic breast cancer was based on statistically significant and clinically meaningful PFS and OS improvements observed in the DESTINY-Breast04 trial and represents the first approved therapy specifically for the treatment of HER2-low metastatic breast cancer.

Background Trastuzumab has substantially improved overall survival and reduced the risk of disease recurrence in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor type II ( HER- II)-positive breast cancer. However, this benefit may be at the increased risk of cardiotoxicity. We aimed to explore the early subclinical left and right ventricular as well as atrial dysfunction, in trastuzumab-treated patients with HER- II-positive breast cancer, using velocity vector imaging. Methods Echocardiography images were acquired in 50 patients with HER- II -positive breast cancer undergoing trastuzumab therapy. All patients had baseline and 3-6 months and 12-15 months of follow-up echocardiograms after initiation of trastuzumab therapy. Subendocardial borders of all the cardiac chambers were traced from the apical views to obtain volumetric and deformation indices. Results Mean age was 60 ± 13 years. Left ventricular ( LV) ejection fraction as well as conventional indices of right ventricular ( RV) function did not change with trastuzumab. The RV peak systolic global longitudinal strain ( GLε) significantly decreased (−24.53 ± 6.03 vs. −21.28 ± 5.11 vs. −21.84 ± 5.15, baseline vs. first and second follow-ups, P = 0.01). LV peak systolic GLε was reduced by 1.19 at early follow-up (P < 0.05). Left atrial reservoir and booster pump functions as well as right atrial reservoir function were reduced through follow-up as well. Conclusions The RV exhibited greater change in strain after trastuzumab treatment when compared to the LV. Atria function was reduced by trastuzumab as well. The repercussion of these findings and their potential implication will warrant further study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein negatively affects survival in breast cancer. This study aimed to assess real-world treatment patterns and costs associated with resected nonmetastatic HER2-positive breast cancer in the United States. Patients and Methods Commercially insured patients with HER2-positive breast cancer were identified from oncology registry data linked to a large US commercial administrative claims database. Treatment patterns and health care use and costs in the initial phase of care were examined. Results Among the 915 patients who met the study criteria, 662 (72%) were hormone receptor (HR) positive, and 253 (28%) were HR negative. Overall, 72% (n 5 662) of patients received HER2- targeted therapy (HR positive, 69% v HR negative, 80%; P <. 01), specifically trastuzumab. The most common treatment regimens, regardless of HR status, were carboplatin, docetaxel, and trastuzumab (47% of patients) during neoadjuvant therapy and carboplatin, docetaxel, and trastuzumab6hormone therapy (30% of patients) during adjuvant therapy. Overall unadjusted cost of treatment per patient per month(HR positive, $11,906 v HR negative, $14,367; P < .001) was mainly cancer related (HR positive, $10,513 v HR negative, $13,073; P < .001). Adjusted 12-month cost was $176,779 (HR positive, $167,088 v HR negative, $180,226; P > .05). Conclusion Although trastuzumab-based therapy is considered standard of care among patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer, approximately 28% of these patients did not receive HER2-targeted therapy. Additional studies are warranted to examine whether patients who have not received targeted therapy are eligible for and would benefit from an HER2-targeted approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: HER2 positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is associated with high mortality. Trastuzumab was approved for use in 1998, but the life-years saved from first-line use are unknown, as are the potential US population benefits from adding pertuzumab.Objectives: The first aim was to estimate the number of life-years saved by using first-line trastuzumab between 1999 and 2013 in HER2+ women with MBC. In addition, based on these estimates, the second aim was to project the life-years that could be saved by adding pertuzumab to trastuzumab in first-line therapy.Methods: We constructed a simulation model accounting for incidence, testing rates, therapy utilization, and overall survival. The model was run for 1999 to 2013 (15 years) to estimate the life-years saved from using trastuzumab plus chemotherapy instead of chemotherapy alone. The model was also run from 2013 to 2027 (15 years) to project the life-years that might be saved by adding pertuzumab. Uncertainty was incorporated using Monte-Carlo methods.Results: The estimated number of women with HER2+ MBC varied over time, with the peak of 9700 in 2005 and the low of 7700 in 2018. The cumulative incremental life-years saved because of first-line trastuzumab use from 1999 to 2013 was estimated to be 156,413 (95% simulation interval 114,840-195,201). The projection for pertuzumab from 2013 to 2027 was 137,959 (95% simulation interval 56,011-225,069). Exploratory analyses of value showed that pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy is associated with a $1.10 billion gain compared with chemotherapy alone, and adding pertuzumab is associated with a $0.06 billion gain compared with trastuzumab with chemotherapy.Conclusions: This simulation model suggests that substantial progress has been made in treating HER2+ women over the past 15 years, and the future may witness similar gains with the introduction of pertuzumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a study on cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction and chemotherapeutic agents. Topics covered include an echocardiogram protocol focusing on valvular disease, pericardial disease and diastolic function, evaluation of the left ventricular diastolic function and right ventricular function, and the use of imaging modalities multi-gated blood pool imaging and cardiac magnetic resonance. Also mentioned is the coordination between cardiologists and oncologists.

Objective: To assess the economic evaluation of margetuximab plus chemotherapy over trastuzumab plus chemotherapy for women with pretreated ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer in the United States (US) and China., Methods: Based on the SOPHIA trial, a three-state Markov model was developed to compare the cost and efficacy of margetuximab to trastuzumab for previously treated women with ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer. The model inputs were derived from existing literature and the US life table. Primary outcomes included lifetime costs in US dollars, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the impact of uncertainty., Results: The base case analyses demonstrated that margetuximab plus chemotherapy had an increasing cost of $68,132 and $20,540 over trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in the US and China, respectively, with a gain of 0.11 and 0.09 QALYs both favored margetuximab. The ICERs for two treatment strategies were $260,176 in the US and $630,777 in China, resulting in a poor cost-effectiveness at their respective threshold of willingness to play. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the results to be most sensitive to the price of margetuximab and that of trastuzumab. And an 11 and 82% price reduction of margetuximab would make this regimen cost-effective in the US and China, respectively., Conclusion: In the US and China, margetuximab plus chemotherapy is not likely to be cost-effective for women with pretreated ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer, whereas price reduction effectively improves insufficient cost-effectiveness., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Tang, Xu, Gao, Chen, Zhu, Wang, Yan, Chen and Zhu.)

The article offers information on how pharmacogenomics can aid nurses provide better care for patients. It illustrates an example of a lady aged 62 who experienced an acute myocardial infarction and was prescribed with genetic testing which resulted in better outcome. It discusses pharmacogenomic implications with warfarin drug, including antiplatelet therapy, mental health, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) therapy, and oncology. Further discussed are limitations of genetic testing.

Aim: Utilization of signal detection methods in longitudinal claims data can improve post-marketing drug surveillance, but to date there has been limited application. The aim of this study is to use 3 approaches, the proportional reporting ratio, Gamma Poisson Shrinker, and tree-based scan statistic in detecting adverse drug events (ADEs) attributed to trastuzumab using an administrative claims dataset., Methods: Using data from the Texas Cancer Registry and SEER linked to Medicare from 2010 to 2013, we conducted 1:2 propensity score matching. Breast cancer HER2+ patients treated with trastuzumab in addition to standard chemotherapy were matched to HER2- patients treated with standard chemotherapy. Inpatient and outpatient encounters up to 6 months from start of therapy were used to identify adverse events., Results: A total of 4191 patients were included in the study. Across all methods, use of trastuzumab generated signals on 9 distinct body systems. Cardiomyopathy and heart valve disease were the most consistently detected signals. Clinical review determined that most signals represented known ADEs., Conclusions: We showed that claims data can be used to complement current ADE monitoring using common data mining methods with propensity score matching. Our analysis identified all expected ADEs associated with trastuzumab, and additional signals of valvular heart disorders., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Off-label use is the practice of prescribing a drug outside the terms of its official labeling. Worldwide, about 20% of the commonly prescribed medications are off-label, and the percentage increases in specific patient populations, such as children, pregnant women, and cancer patients. Off-label use is particularly widespread in oncology for many reasons, including the wide variety of cancer subtypes, the difficulties involved in performing clinical trials, the rapid diffusion of preliminary results, and delays in the approval of new drugs by regulatory organizations/agencies. Objective: The aim of this article is to describe the use of off-label drugs in oncology, with an emphasis on the role of the world's leading regulatory agencies and an assessment of current Italian legislation. Conclusion: Off-label drug utilization is essential in oncology when based on evidence. However, off-label drugs must be prescribed in accordance with existing national laws and only when the potential benefit outweighs the potential toxic effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent evidence suggests that the economic value of increased health has been enormous, with most of these gains being driven by medical R&D. The R&D process for pharmaceuticals is particularly expensive and time consuming, with well-known studies from the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development suggesting that developing a single successful drug costs around $1 billion and takes roughly 12 years. We argue that these estimates are incomplete because they do not incorporate the social costs imposed by the regulatory process, namely the costs to producers in terms of forgone profits and the costs to consumers in terms of delayed access to drugs. In this article, we develop a framework to estimate the social costs imposed by the regulatory process. Under this framework, delays in drug development are socially costly because of reduced consumer surplus (due to delayed access to beneficial therapies), reduced producer variable profits, and increased R&D expenditures. We apply this framework to the case of therapies aimed at treating AIDS, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and breast cancer. In each case, we find that the effects of drug delays on consumer surplus and variable producer profits are far larger than the effects on R&D costs. These findings suggest that patients, not firms, would be the primary beneficiaries from any improvements in streamlining the drug development process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Decision makers must make decisions without complete information. That uncertainty can be decreased when economic evaluations use local data and can be quantified by considering the variability of all model inputs concurrently per international evaluation guidelines. It is unclear how these recommendations have been implemented in evaluations of targeted cancer therapy. By using economic evaluations of adjuvant trastuzumab, we have assessed the extent to which decision support recommendations were adopted. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: Published economic evaluations of adjuvant trastuzumab treatment in early-stage breast cancer were examined as an established example of targeted therapy. Canadian, United Kingdom, and US economic evaluation guidelines were reviewed to establish extraction criteria. Extraction characterized the use of effectiveness evidence and local data sources for model parameters, sensitivity analysis methods (scenario, univariate, multivariate, and probabilistic) and uncertainty representation (ie, cost-effectiveness plane, scatterplot, confidence ellipses, tornado diagrams, cost-effectiveness acceptability curve). Results: Fifteen economic evaluations of adjuvant trastuzumab were identified in the literature. Local data were used to estimate costs (15 of 15) and utilities rarely (two of 15) but not trastuzumab efficacy. Univariate sensitivity analysis was most common (12 of 15), whereas probabilistic analysis was less frequent(10 of 15). Two thirds of all studies provided visual representation of results and decision uncertainty. Conclusion: Authors of adjuvant trastuzumab economic evaluations rarely use local data beyond costs. Quantification of uncertainty and its representation also fell short of guideline recommendations. This review demonstrates that economic evaluations of adjuvant trastuzumab, as an example of targeted cancer therapy, can be improved for decision-making support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) are the only tests currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for classifying which patients will benefit from trastuzumab therapy. The accuracy of these two testing methods can be adversely affected by a variety of pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical factors. According to the latest published recommendations of the panel of the Joint Committee of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists for HER2/neu testing, laboratories performing IHC and FISH for HER2/neu status in breast cancer are now required to have a high concordance of at least 95% between IHC and FISH, significantly higher than that in the published literature. AIM: To perform a retrospective analysis of the concordance of IHC and FISH analysis for HER2/neu at Singapore General Hospital and review potential causes of disparity between these two methods. METHOD: A retrospective review of a total of 106 invasive ductal carcinomas evaluated for HER2/neu at the Department of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital between 2007 and 2008 were included in the study. The initial HER2/neu immunostained slides were reviewed independently without knowledge of FISH results, and concordance between IHC and FISH was determined. RESULTS: Concordance between IHC and FISH assay was excellent and within the published range (104/106=98.1%). The discordant cases represent a well-recognised subset of genetic heterogeneity in HER2/neu, which is known to contribute to positive IHC and negative FISH tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endometrial cancer is the most common female genital tract malignancy in the United States. Type I endometrial cancer is usually diagnosed at an early stage, and has a good prognosis. Type II is very aggressive, and is responsible for most uterine cancer relapses and deaths. Uterine serous adenocarcinomas (USC) constitute the majority of Type II variants. They have a higher propensity for lymph node and distant metastases. They are frequently aneuploid and associated with p53 mutations. erbB2 overexpression in USC has been described. The incidence, which is higher in African Americans, ranges from 18-80%. erbB2 overexpression was found to be associated with higher stage, chemoresistance, and worse survival. Trastuzumab a humanizedmAb was approved by the FDA for treatment of breast cancers that overexpress erbB2 in combination with standard chemotherapy. Evidence of trastuzumab activity in USC has been reported in vitro, as well as in case reports of advanced and recurrent cases. Promising results were obtained in these heavily pretreated patients either with trastuzumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy. This supports the hypothesis that trastuzumab may very well be an attractive and viable treatment option for advanced stage USC tumors that overexpress the erbB2, and is worthy of further study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a study on the importance of understanding the vulnerability of heart as a pluricellular paracrine system because this will determine the side effects of ErbB2 inhibitors in the U.S. The study intends to help pharmacological industry design effective anticancer dugs that will minimize cardiac toxicity. Moreover, the molecule inhibitor of ErbB2/Her2, lapatinib, has been viewed more efficient over trastuzumab because it does not show a significant cardiotoxicity in the heart.

The article presents a study which examines the utilization and cost effectiveness of human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) testing strategies in clinical practice in the U.S. It notes that HER2 testing aims to determine which breast cancer patients overexpress HER2 gene and to prove whether trastuzumab treatment to 20-30% patients is highly effective. It emphasizes on the importance of understanding the use of HER2 testing in cancer care because of its critical role in targeting therapy.

The purpose of this feature is to heighten awareness of specific adverse drug reactions (ADRs), discuss methods of prevention, and promote reporting of ADRs to the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) MEDWATCH program (800-FDA-1088). If you have reported an interesting, preventable ADR to MEDWATCH, please consider sharing the account with our readers. Write to Dr. Shuster at ISMP, 200 Lakeside Drive, Suite 200, Horsham, PA 19044 (phone: 215-947-7797; fax: 215-914-1492; e-mail: joel.shuster@temple.edu). Your report will be published anonymously unless otherwise requested. This feature is provided by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) in cooperation with the FDA's MEDWATCH program and Temple University School of Pharmacy. ISMP is an FDA MEDWATCH partner. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Pharmacoeconomic analyses typically project the expected cost-effectiveness of a new product for a specific indication. This analysis develops a dynamic life-cycle model to conduct a multiindication evaluation using the case of trastuzumab licensed in the United States for both early-stage and metastatic (or late-stage) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer therapy (early breast cancer [EBC]; metastatic breast cancer [MBC]), approved in 2006 and 1998, respectively. Methods: This dynamic model combined information on expected incremental cost-utility ratios for specific indications with an epidemiologically based projection of utilization by indication over the product life cycle—from 1998 to 2016. Net economic value was estimated as the cumulative quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained over the life cycle multiplied by a societal valuation of health gains ($/QALY) minus cumulative net direct treatment costs. Sensitivity analyses were performed under a range of assumptions. Results: We projected that the annual number of EBC patients receiving trastuzumab will be more than three times that of MBC by 2016, in part because adjuvant treatment reduces the future incidence of MBC. Over this life cycle, the estimated overall incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $35,590/QALY with a total of 432,547 discounted QALYs gained. Under sensitivity analyses, the overall ICER varied from $21,000 to $53,000/QALY, and the projected net economic value resulting from trastuzumab treatment ranged from $6.2 billion to $49.5 billion. Conclusions: Average ICERs for multiindication compounds can increase or decrease over the product life cycle. In this example, the projected overall life-cycle ICER for trastuzumab was less than one half of that in the initial indication. This dynamic perspective—versus the usual static one—highlights the interdependence of drug development decisions and investment incentives, raising important reimbursement policy issues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]