Search

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) established the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network to address the unique challenges of performing research on rare diseases. The Urea Cycle Disorders Consortium (UCDC) was one of the original ten consortia established. The UCDC represents a unique partnership among clinicians, patients, and the NIH with a primary goal of increasing the development of therapeutics that improve patient outcomes for persons affected with a UCD. Based in part on financial incentives associated with the Orphan Drug Act biopharmaceutical and investment entities have an intense interest in engaging with research consortia like the UCDC, which have compiled potentially valuable longitudinal data characterizing outcomes in a relatively large number of affected individuals. We describe the UCDC experience and the bases for evaluating partnerships with such private entities. We review early industry interactions, the development of policies and procedures, and describe the establishment of an Industry Relations Committee, including guiding principles. Challenges encountered, particularly in the transition when products are approved, and potential solutions are discussed. By building a framework for industry partnerships that guides us in resolving inevitable challenges, we can enthusiastically pursue novel and promising collaborations that can lead to breakthroughs in therapeutic interventions for patients.

Urea cycle disorders (UCDs) are rare inherited metabolic conditions that impair the effectiveness of the urea cycle responsible for removing excess ammonia from the body. The estimated incidence of UCDs is 1:35 000 births, or approximately 113 new patients with UCD per year. This review summarizes neuropsychological outcomes among patients with the eight UCDs in reports published since 1980. Rates of intellectual disabilities published before (and including) 2000 and after 2000 were pooled and compared for each UCD. Since diagnoses for UCDs tended to occur earlier and better treatments became more readily available after the turn of the century, this assessment will characterize the extent that current management strategies have improved neuropsychological outcomes. The pooled sample included data on cognitive abilities of 1649 individuals reported in 58 citations. A total of 556 patients (34%) functioned in the range of intellectual disabilities. The decline in the proportion of intellectual disabilities in six disorders, ranged from 7% to 41%. Results from various studies differed and the cohorts varied with respect to age at symptom onset, age at diagnosis and treatment initiation, current age, severity of the metabolic deficiency, management strategies, and ethnic origins. The proportion of cases with intellectual disabilities ranged from 9% to 65% after 2000 in the seven UCDs associated with cognitive deficits. Positive outcomes from some studies suggest that it is possible to prevent or reverse the adverse impact of UCDs on neuropsychological functioning. It is time to "raise the bar" in terms of expectations for treatment effectiveness., (© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of SSIEM.)

Introduction: Glycerol phenylbutyrate (GPB) is currently approved for use in the US and Europe for patients of all ages with urea cycle disorders (UCD) who cannot be managed with protein restriction and/or amino acid supplementation alone. Currently available data on GPB is limited to 12 months exposure. Here, we present long-term experience with GPB., Methods: This was an open-label, long-term safety study of GPB conducted in the US (17 sites) and Canada (1 site) monitoring the use of GPB in UCD patients who had previously completed 12 months of treatment in the previous safety extension studies. Ninety patients completed the previous studies with 88 of these continuing into the long-term evaluation. The duration of therapy was open ended until GPB was commercially available. The primary endpoint was the rate of adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints were venous ammonia levels, number and causes of hyperammonemic crises (HACs) and neuropsychological testing., Results: A total of 45 pediatric patients between the ages of 1 to 17 years (median 7 years) and 43 adult patients between the ages of 19 and 61 years (median 30 years) were enrolled. The treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) reported in ≥10% of adult or pediatric patients were consistent with the TEAEs reported in the previous safety extension studies with no increase in the overall incidence of TEAEs and no new TEAEs that indicated a new safety signal. Mean ammonia levels remained stable and below the adult upper limit of normal (<35 µmol/L) through 24 months of treatment in both the pediatric and adult population. Over time, glutamine levels decreased in the overall population. The mean annualized rate of HACs (0.29) established in the previously reported 12-month follow-up study was maintained with continued GPB exposure., Conclusion: Following the completion of 12-month follow-up studies with GPB treatment, UCD patients were followed for an additional median of 1.85 (range 0 to 5.86) years in the present study with continued maintenance of ammonia control, similar rates of adverse events, and no new adverse events identified., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Although the protocol that most experienced metabolic centers in the United States follow for treating acute hyperammonemia in urea cycle disorders (UCDs) is similar to that proposed by Brusilow and Batshaw in the early 1980s, over the years a steady evolution has taken place. Continued developments in intensive care, surgical and hemodialysis techniques, fluid and electrolyte management, cardiovascular support, and emergency transport have contributed to improved management of acute hyperammonemia. Compared to historical data, survival of urea cycle patients has also improved following treatment with alternative pathway therapy, in addition to appropriate supportive care, including the provision of adequate calories to prevent catabolism and promote anabolism and hemodialysis if needed. However, overall neurological outcomes have been suboptimal. There are currently a number of exciting prospective new therapies on the horizon, including novel medications or cell-based treatments. Nevertheless, the therapeutic expertise that is currently in place at centers specializing in management of metabolic emergencies already has the potential to improve survival and outcome in these children significantly. The early identification of UCD patients so that transport to a metabolic treatment center may be carried out without delay continues to be a major area of focus and challenge. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]