Search

The article discusses the reason for the move of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine not to endorse the 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). The said guideline was released by the American Thyroid Association (ATA). Factors behind the decision to ablate or not to ablate are also mentioned.

The author reflects on the basics of the theranostic concept established by nuclear medicine in the U.S. The author describes the use of F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in oncology as form of theranostics. The author states the use of tracers such as FDG on external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is a clear diagnostic test linked to a specific therapy. The author mentions the connection between diagnostic tests in nuclear medicine and clear prognostic stratification.

The article focuses on a study conducted by R. M. Tuttle and colleagues regarding the staging, treatment and follow-up of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). An overview of the situation involving the aftercare of patients with DTC is provided including the absence of a scoring system to predict the risk of recurrence. The problem in using the American Thyroid Association (ATA) staging system is discussed in relation to recurrences that indicated unsuccessful ablation of postoperative thyroid remnant tissue.

Background: Many countries have national guidelines for the management of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), including a risk stratification system to predict recurrence of disease. Studies whether these guidelines could also have relevance, beyond their original design, in predicting survival are lacking. Additionally, no studies evaluated these international guidelines in the same population, nor compared them with the TNM system. Therefore, we investigated the prognostic value of 6 stratification systems used by 10 international guidelines, and the TNM system with respect to predicting disease-specific survival (DSS)., Methods: We retrospectively studied adult patients with DTC from a Dutch university hospital. Patients were classified using the risk classification described in the British, Dutch, French, Italian, Polish, Spanish, European Society of Medical Oncology, European Thyroid Association, the 2009 and 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines, and the latest TNM system. DSS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the statistical model performance using the C-index, Akaike information criterion, Bayesian information criterion, and proportion of variance explained., Results: We included 857 patients with DTC (79% papillary thyroid cancer, 21% follicular thyroid cancer). Median follow-up was 9 years, and 67 (7.8%) died because of DTC. The Dutch guideline had the worst statistical model performance, whereas the 2009 ATA/2014 British guideline had the best. However, the (adapted) TNM system outperformed all stratification systems., Conclusions: In a European population of patients with DTC, of 10 international guidelines using 6 risk of recurrence stratification systems and 1 mortality-based stratification system, our optimized age-adjusted TNM system (8th edition) outperformed all other systems., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society.)

Background: The American Thyroid Association (ATA) management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) are highly influential practice recommendations. The latest revision appeared in 2015 ("ATA 2015"). These guidelines were developed predominantly by North American experts. European experts frequently have different perspectives, given epidemiological, technological/methodological, practice organization, and medicolegal differences between the respective regions., Summary: Divergent viewpoints were the focus of an invited symposium organized by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine involving 17 European thyroidologists, four ATA Guidelines Taskforce members, and an audience of 200 international experts. The group discussed the preoperative assessment of thyroid nodules, surgery and the role of pathology, radioiodine (RAI) therapy (RAIT), the assessment of initial therapy and dynamic risk stratification, and the treatment of persistent disease, recurrences, and advanced thyroid cancer. The dialogue resulted in this position paper contrasting European and ATA 2015 perspectives on key issues. One difference pertains to the permissiveness of ATA 2015 regarding lobectomy for primary tumors ≤4 cm. European panelists cited preclusion of RAIT, potential need for completion thyroidectomy, frequent inability to avoid chronic thyroid hormone replacement, and limitations of supportive evidence as arguments against widely applying lobectomy. Significant divergence involved ATA 2015's guidance regarding RAIT. European panelists favored wider use of postoperative RAIT than does ATA 2015. Rationales included the modality's association with favorable patient outcomes and generally limited toxicity, and lack of high-quality evidence supporting withholding RAIT. Additionally, European panelists favored recombinant human thyrotropin (rhTSH) in more settings than does ATA 2015, citing avoidance of hypothyroid morbidity and quality-of-life impairment, without apparent sacrifice in oncologic outcomes. Based on clinical evidence plus theoretical advantages, European experts advocated dosimetric versus fixed-activity RAIT approaches for advanced DTC. European panelists noted that the ATA 2015 risk-stratification system requires information sometimes unavailable in everyday practice. ATA 2015 recommendations regarding RAI-refractory DTC should consider potential palliative benefits of RAIT in patients who also have RAI-susceptible lesions., Conclusions: European panelists suggested modifications to approximately one-third of ATA 2015 recommendations. Varying European and ATA 2015 perspectives can stimulate analysis and discussion of the literature and performance of primary research to resolve discrepant recommendations and potentially improve patient outcomes.

Objective: To assess the changes resulting from the changes from UICC/AJCC TNM version 7 to version 8 and to subsequently determine whether TNM version 8 is an improvement compared to previous iterations of the TNM system and other staging systems for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) with regard to prognostic power., Design: Database study of DTC patients treated in our centre between 1978 up to and including 1 July 2014. Results were compared to our previous comparison of prognostic systems using the same data set., Patients: 2257 DTC patients., Measurements: Staging in accordance with TNM 7 and TNM 8. Thyroid cancer-specific mortality; comparison was based on p-values of univariate Cox regression analyses as well as analysis of the proportion of variance explained (PVE)., Results: There is a redistribution from stage 3 to lower stages affecting 206 (9.1%) patients. DTC-related mortality according to Kaplan-Meier for younger and older patients in TNM 7 had a slightly lower prognostic power than that in accordance with TNM 8 (P = 8.0 10 -16 and P = 1.5 10 -21 , respectively). Overall staging is lower in 627/2257 (27.8%) patients. PVE (TNM 7: 0.29; TNM 8: 0.28) and the P-value of Cox regressions (TNM 7: P = 7.1*10 -52 ; TNM 8: P = 3.9*10 -49 ) for TNM version 8 are marginally lower than that for TNM version 7, but still better than for any other DTC staging system., Conclusion: TNM 8 results in a marked downstaging of patients compared to TNM 7. Although some changes, like the change in age boundary, appear to be associated with an improvement in prognostic power, the overall effect of the changes does not improve the predictive power compared to TNM 7., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)