Search

Background: Over 700 donor livers are discarded annually in the United States due to high risk of poor graft function. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of using normothermic machine perfusion to identify transplantable livers among those currently discarded. Study Design: A series of 21 discarded human livers underwent viability assessment during normothermic machine perfusion. Cross‐sectional analysis of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database and cost analysis was performed to extrapolate the case series to national experience. Results: 21 discarded human livers were included in the perfusion cohort. 11 of 20 (55%) eligible grafts met viability criteria for transplantation. Grafts in the perfusion cohort had a similar donor risk index compared with discarded grafts (n = 1402) outside of New England in 2017 and 2018 (median [IQR]: 2.0 [1.5, 2.4] vs. 2.0 [1.7, 2.3], P =.40). 705 (IQR 677‐741) livers were discarded annually in the United States since 2005, translating to the potential for 398 additional transplants nationally. The median cost to identify a transplantable graft with machine perfusion was $28,099 USD. Conclusions: Normothermic machine perfusion of discarded livers could identify a significant number of transplantable grafts, significantly improving access to liver transplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The financial impact of liver transplantation has been underexplored. We aimed to identify associations between high financial burden (≥10% annual income spent on out-of-pocket medical costs) and work productivity, financial distress (coping behaviors in response to the financial burden), and financial toxicity (health-related quality of life, HRQOL) among adult recipients of liver transplant. Between June 2021 and May 2022, we surveyed 207 adult recipients of liver transplant across 5 US transplant centers. Financial burden and distress were measured by 25 items adapted from national surveys of cancer survivors. Participants also completed the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment and EQ-5D-5L HRQOL questionnaires. In total, 23% of recipients reported high financial burden which was significantly associated with higher daily activity impairment (32.9% vs. 23.3%, p =0.048). In adjusted analyses, the high financial burden was significantly and independently associated with delayed or foregone medical care (adjusted odds ratio, 3.95; 95% CI, 1.85-8.42) and being unable to afford basic necessities (adjusted odds ratio, 5.12; 95% CI: 1.61-16.37). Recipients experiencing high financial burden had significantly lower self-reported HRQOL as measured by the EQ-5D-5L compared to recipients with low financial burden (67.8 vs. 76.1, p =0.008) and an age-matched and sex-matched US general population (67.8 vs. 79.1, p <0.001). In this multicenter cohort study, nearly 1 in 4 adult recipients of liver transplant experienced a high financial burden, which was significantly associated with delayed or foregone medical care and lower self-reported HRQOL. These findings underscore the need to evaluate and address the financial burden in this population before and after transplantation., (Copyright © 2024 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background: Delisting for being "too sick" to be transplanted is subjective. Previous work has demonstrated that the mortality of patients delisted for "too sick" is unexpectedly low. Transplant centers use their best clinical judgment for determining "too sick," but it is unclear how social determinants influence decisions to delist for "too sick." We hypothesized that social determinants and Donor Service Area (DSA) characteristics may be associated with determination of "too sick" to transplant., Methods: Data were obtained from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients for adults listed and removed from the liver transplant waitlist from 2002 to 2017. Patients were included if delisted for "too sick." Our primary outcome was Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at waitlist removal for "too sick." Regression assessed the association between social determinants and MELD at removal for "too sick.", Results: We included 5250 delisted for "too sick" at 127 centers, in 53 DSAs, over 16 years. The mean MELD at delisting for "too sick" was 25.8 (SD ± 11.2). On adjusted analysis, social determinants including age, race, sex, and education predicted the MELD at delisting for "too sick" (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: There is variation in delisting MELD for "too sick" score across DSA and time. While social determinants at the patient and system level are associated with delisting practices, the interplay of these variables warrants additional research. In addition, center outcome reports should include waitlist removal rate for "too sick" and waitlist death ratios, so waitlist management practice at individual centers can be monitored.

The risk of adverse outcomes for pediatric renal transplant patients is highest during the transition from pediatric to adult care. While there have been many studies focus on graft failure and death, loss to follow-up likely plays a large role in patient outcomes. We hypothesize patients are lost to follow-up during this transition period and that patients transplanted at pediatric centers with a closely affiliated adult center (AFFs) are less likely to suffer from fragmentation of care and become lost to follow-up. AFFs were defined as those pediatric centers whose transplant surgeons were also on staff at an adult center and were identified using center websites. We included patients undergoing renal transplantation at <=18 years of age and had data for the entire transition period on the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (n = 6,762, 92.3% in 95 AFFs). 32% of patients were lost to follow-up. On regression, patients transplanted at AFF were 33% less likely to be lost to follow-up compared with those from non-AFF (OR 0.67 CI 0.54-0.82, P < 0.01). The proportion of patients lost to follow-up during the transition period is remarkably high, but lower among recipients transplanted at AFFs. Poor follow-up may be mitigated by improving integration of care., (2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Getting listed for liver transplantation is a complex process. Institutional health literacy may influence the ability of patients with limited educational attainment (EA) to list. As an easily accessible indicator of institutional health literacy, we measured the understandability of liver transplant center education websites and assessed whether there was any association with the percentage of low EA patients on their waitlists., Methods: Patients on the waitlist for liver transplantation 2007-2016 were identified in Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Understandability of patient education websites was assessed using the Clear Communication Index (CCI). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has set itself a goal CCI of 90 as being easy to understand. Low EA was defined as less than a high school education. We adjusted for center case-mix, Donor Service Area characteristics, and EA of the general population., Results: Patients (84 774) were listed across 112 liver transplant centers. The median percent of waitlisted patients at each center with low EA was 11.0% (IQR, 6.6-16.8). CCI ranged from 53 to 88 and correlated with the proportion of low EA patients on the waitlist. However, CCI was not associated with the percentage of low EA in the general population. For every 1-point improvement in CCI, low EA patients increase by 0.2% (P < 0.05), translating to a 3.6% increase, or additional 3000 patients, if all centers improved their websites to CCI of 90., Conclusions: Educational websites that are easier to understand are associated with increased access to liver transplantation for patients with low EA. Lowering the health literacy burden by transplant centers may improve access to the liver transplant waitlist.

Background: Direct-acting antivirals have changed the landscape of hepatitis C virus (HCV) care. While transplantation with HCV-positive donor organs is increasing, little is known about providers' attitudes toward this topic. The aim of this study is to determine providers' attitudes toward HCV-positive kidney transplantation., Methods: Willing transplant and nontransplant nephrologists, transplant surgeons, and mid-level providers completed an online survey from April through May 2018. The survey asked about HCV knowledge and willingness to transplant HCV-positive antibody, nucleic acid testing-positive kidneys into HCV-negative recipients. Descriptive analyses including mean and median for continuous variables and frequencies for categorical variables were calculated., Results: Seven-hundred surveys were emailed and 99 providers (62 transplant nephrologists, 28 nontransplant nephrologists, 7 transplant surgeons, and 2 advanced practice providers) completed the survey (participation rate 14.1%). All providers knew that HCV was curable, with 60% believing that it had no effect on transplant success and 32% thinking it reduced transplant success. Providers were significantly more likely to offer a HCV-positive organ to HCV-positive recipients compared to HCV-negative recipients in all queried circumstances (p < 0.005 in all cases), especially with increasing impact on patient's quality of life. While only 39% of providers would offer a HCV-positive organ for transplant to a patient without HCV if it reduced the waitlist time by 1 year, 92% would offer a HCV-positive organ if it reduced the waitlist time by 4 years. However, only 47% thought that the use of HCV-positive kidneys should be for routine care, while 38% believed it should be reserved for research purposes only. There were no significant differences between transplant and nontransplant nephrologists in attitudes toward HCV-positive kidney transplantation. Providers believed that donor organs from those who were obese, >50 years old, or had died from a cardiac arrest were significantly more likely to reduce the likelihood of a successful transplant 1-year posttransplant when compared with a HCV-positive organ (p < 0.005 in all cases). Eighty-six percent of providers had concerns about HCV curability posttransplant., Conclusion: Although 92% of providers were willing to offer a HCV-positive kidney for transplant as patient waitlist time increases, less than half supported offering HCV-positive transplantation for routine care rather than for research. The results underscore the need for further education and data about the efficacy and safety of HCV-positive kidney transplantation., (© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are screened at presentation for appropriateness of liver transplantation (LT) using morphometric criteria, which poorly specifies risk. Morphology is the crux of measuring tumor response to locoregional therapy (LRT) using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). This study investigated the utility of following a continuous risk score (hazard associated with liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma; HALTHCC) to longitudinally assess risk. This multicenter, retrospective study from 2002 to 2014 enrolled 419 patients listed for LT for HCC. One cohort had LRT while waiting (n = 351), compared to the control group (n = 68) without LRT. Imaging studies (n = 2,085) were collated to laboratory data to calculate HALTHCC, MORAL, Metroticket 2.0, and alpha fetoprotein (AFP) score longitudinally. Cox proportional hazards evaluated associations of HALTHCC and peri-LRT changes with intention-to-treat (ITT) survival (considering dropout or post-LT mortality), and utility was assessed with Harrell's C-index. HALTHCC better predicted ITT outcome (LT = 309; dropout = 110) when assessed closer to delisting (P < 0.0001), maximally just before delisting (C-index, 0.742 [0.643-0.790]). Delta-HALTHCC post-LRT was more sensitive to changes in risk than mRECIST. HALTHCC score and peri-LRT percentage change were independently associated with ITT mortality (hazard ratio = 1.105 [1.045-1.169] per point and 1.014 [1.004-1.024] per percent, respectively)., Conclusions: HALTHCC is superior in assessing tumor risk in candidates awaiting LT, and its utility increases over time. Peri-LRT relative change in HALTHCC outperforms mRECIST in stratifying risk of dropout, mortality, and recurrence post-LT. With improving estimates of post-LT outcomes, it is reasonable to consider allocation using HALTHCC and not just waiting time. Furthermore, this study supports a shift in perspective, from listing to allocation, to better utilize precious donor organs. (Hepatology 2018)., (© 2018 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background: Although residential segregation has been implicated in various negative health outcomes, its association with kidney transplantation has not been examined., Methods: Age- and sex-standardized kidney transplantation rates were calculated from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, 2000-2013. Population characteristics including segregation indices were derived from the 2010 U.S. Census data and the U.S. Renal Data System. Separate multivariable Poisson regression models were constructed to identify factors independently associated with kidney transplantation among Blacks and Whites., Results: Median age- and sex-standardized kidney transplantation rates were 114 per 100,000 for Blacks and 38 per 100,000 for Whites. 16.1% of the U.S. population lived in counties with high segregation. There was no difference in the kidney transplantation rates across the levels of segregation among Blacks and Whites., Conclusion: Factors other than residential segregation may play roles in kidney transplantation disparities. Continued efforts to identify these factors may be beneficial in reducing transplantation disparities across the U.S., Summary: Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and U.S. census data, we aimed to determine whether residential segregation was associated with kidney transplantation rates. We found that there was no association between residential segregation and kidney transplantation rates., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Kidney transplant centers are distributed unevenly throughout 58 donor service areas (DSAs) in the United States. Market competition and transplant center density may affect transplantation access and outcomes. We evaluated the role of spatial organization of transplant centers in conjunction with market competition in the conduct of kidney transplantation., Methods: The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients was queried for market characteristics associated with kidney transplantation between 2003 and 2012. Market competition was calculated using the Herfindahl Hirschman Index. Kidney transplant centers were geocoded to measure spatial organization by the average nearest neighbor (ANN) method. Kidney quality was assessed by kidney donor risk index. A hierarchical negative binomial mixed effects model tested the relationship between market characteristics and annual kidney transplants by DSA., Results: About 152,071 kidney transplants were performed at 229 adult kidney transplant centers in 58 DSAs. Greater market competition was associated with kidney transplant center spatial clustering (P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, more kidney transplant centers (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.04; P = 0.005), 100 more new listings (IRR, 1.02; P = 0.003), 100 more deceased donors (IRR, 1.23; P < 0.001), 100 more new dialysis registrants (IRR, 1.01; P < 0.001), and higher kidney donor risk index (IRR, 1.98; P < 0.001) were associated with increased kidney transplants., Conclusions: After controlling for market characteristics, larger numbers of kidney transplant centers were associated with more kidney transplants and increased utilization of deceased donor kidneys. This underlines the importance of understanding geography as well as competition in improving access to kidney transplantation.

Background: Liver transplantation centers are unevenly distributed within the Donor Service Areas (DSAs) of the United States. This study assessed how market competition and liver transplantation center density are associated with liver transplantation volume within individual DSAs., Study Design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 53,156 adult liver transplants in 45 DSAs with 110 transplantation centers identified from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between 2003 and 2012. The following measures were derived annually for each DSA: market competition using the Herfindahl Hirschman Index, transplantation center density by the Average Nearest Neighbor method, liver quality by the Liver Donor Risk Index, and patient risk by the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease. A hierarchical mixed effects negative binomial regression model of the relationship between liver transplants and market factors was created annually. Patient and graft survival were investigated with a Cox proportional hazards model., Results: Transplantation center density was associated with market competition (p < 0.0001), listings for organ transplantation (p < 0.0001), and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease at transplantation (p = 0.0005). More liver transplantation centers (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.03; p = 0.04), greater market competition (IRR = 1.36; p = 0.02), increased listings (IRR = 1.14; p < 0.0001), more donors (IRR = 1.24; p < 0.0001), and higher Liver Donor Risk Index (IRR = 3.35; p < 0.0001) were associated with more transplants. No market variables were associated with increased mortality after transplantation., Conclusions: After controlling for demographic and market factors, a greater concentration of centers was associated with more liver transplants without impacting overall survival. These results warrant additional investigation into the relationship between geospatial factors and liver transplantation volume with consideration for the optimization of scarce resources., (Copyright © 2015 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the impact of market competition on patient mortality and graft failure after kidney transplantation., Background: Kidneys are initially allocated within 58 donation service areas (DSAs), which have varying numbers of transplant centers. Market competition is generally considered beneficial., Methods: The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database was queried and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI), a measure of market competition, was calculated for each DSA from 2003 to 2012. Receipt of low-quality kidneys (Kidney Donor Profile Index ≥ 85) was modeled with multivariable logistic regression, and Cox proportional hazards models were created for graft failure and patient mortality., Results: A total of 127,355 adult renal transplants were performed. DSAs were categorized as 7 no (HHI = 1), 17 low (HHI = 0.52-0.97), 17 medium (HHI = 0.33-0.51), or 17 high (HHI = 0.09-0.32) competition. For deceased donor kidney transplantation, increasing market competition was significantly associated with mortality [hazard ratio (HR): 1.11, P = 0.01], graft failure (HR: 1.18, P = 0.0001), and greater use of low-quality kidneys (odds ratio = 1.39, P < 0.0001). This was not true for living donor kidney transplantation (mortality HR: 0.94, P = 0.48; graft failure HR: 0.99, P = 0.89). Competition was associated with longer waitlists (P = 0.04) but not with the number of transplants per capita in a DSA (P = 0.21)., Conclusions: Increasing market competition is associated with increased patient mortality and graft failure and the use of riskier kidneys. These results may represent more aggressive transplantation and tolerance of greater risk for patients who otherwise have poor alternatives. Market competition should be better studied to ensure optimal outcomes.

Background: Liver transplantation offers life-saving therapy for patients with decompensated liver disease or T2 hepatocellular carcinomas. In the United States, deceased donor livers are primarily allocated by Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score within each of the country's more than 50 donation service areas (DSAs). Variation in DSA size, population, and organ availability have engendered concern that unequal access to deceased donor livers across DSAs contributes to geographic variability in outcome., Methods: To determine the extent to which DSA variability in organ availability correlated with combined waitlist and posttransplant mortality, we analyzed retrospectively national waitlist and posttransplant data for a 7-year period after implementation of the current MELD-based allocation system., Results: Marked variation among DSAs was evident in death rate (3.3-fold), transplant rate (20-fold), and mean transplant MELD (>10 points). Death rate correlated with organ availability was assessed by transplant rate and transplant MELD. DSAs with low organ availability included the country's largest cities, had more new listings per capita, larger waitlists, more transplant centers per DSA, and a higher proportion of black and Asian patients. DSAs of organ shortage were also characterized by more frequent dual listing at another transplant center, more living donor liver transplants, and increased average length of the transplant admission., Conclusions: Geographic differences in deceased donor organ availability contribute to variation in overall death rate of liver transplant patients, shape the clinical practice of transplant, and influence the resources consumed per transplant. Geographic variation in organ access results primarily from rates of listing rather than donation. Our findings highlight the need to restructure organ distribution areas to achieve equal access to deceased donor livers for transplantation in the United States.

Background: We characterize donor utilization for islet transplantation and estimate the number of recipients who could achieve normoglycemia through islet transplantation if the current donor pool were used., Methods: Potential islet donors from all United Network for Organ Sharing donors (1/00-5/04) were identified and categorized into "optimal" islet donors (16-40 yr, body mass index >27 kg/m, hemodynamically stable) or "standard" donors (as traditionally described)., Results: Of 27,552 potential donors during this period, 6,140 donor pancreata were used for whole organ transplant. Of the remaining 21,412 donors, 10,417 potential islet donors were identified (9260 [88.9%] standard and 1157 [11.1%] optimal donors). Islets from only 218 donors were used for transplant, representing 8.7% of optimal donors and 2.1% of all potential islet donors., Conclusion: The widespread use of isolated islets could provide insulin independence for approximately 1000 type I diabetics a year, but at current rates of islet transplant, all recipients could be transplanted with islets from ideal donors.