Search

The EA-QOL questionnaire measures quality-of-life specifically for children born with esophageal atresia (EA) aged 8–18 and was completed in Sweden and Germany. This study aimed to describe an international collaborative initiative to establish a semantically equivalent linguistic version of the EA-QOL questionnaires in 12 new countries. The 24-item EA-QOL questionnaire was translated into the target languages and the translated questionnaire was evaluated through cognitive debriefing interviews with children with EA aged 8–18 and their parents in each new country. Participants rated an item as to whether an item was easy to understand and sensitive/uncomfortable to answer. They could choose not to reply to a non-applicable/problematic item and provide open comments. Data were analyzed using predefined psychometric criteria; item clarity ≥80%, item sensitive/uncomfortable to answer ≤20%, item feasibility(missing item responses ≤5%). Decision to improve any translation was made by native experts–patient stakeholders and the instrument developer. Like in Sweden and Germany, all items in the cross-cultural analysis of child self-report (ntot = 82, 4–10 children/country) met the criteria for item clarity in all 12 new countries, and in parent-report (ntot = 86, 5–10 parents/country) in 8/12 countries. All items fulfilled the criteria for sensitive/uncomfortable to answer (child-report 1.2–9.9%; parent-report 0–11.6%) and item feasibility. Poor translations were resolved. Hence, this study has established semantically equivalent linguistic versions of the EA-QOL questionnaire for use in children aged 8–18 with repair of EA in and across 14 countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Leigh Syndrome (LS) is a rare genetic neurometabolic disorder, that leads to the degeneration of the central nervous system and subsequently, early death. LS can be caused by over 80 mutations in mitochondrial or nuclear DNA. Patient registries are important for many reasons, such as studying the natural history of the disease, improving the quality of care, and understanding the healthcare burden. For rare diseases, patient registries are significantly important as patient numbers are small, and funding is limited. Cure Mito Foundation started a global patient registry for LS in September 2021 to identify and learn about the LS patient population, facilitate clinical trial recruitment, and unite international patients and researchers. Priorities were to allow researchers and industry partners to access data at no cost through a clear and transparent process, active patient engagement, and sharing of results back to the community. Results: Patient registry platform, survey design, data analysis process, and patient recruitment strategies are described. Reported results include demographics, diagnostic information, symptom history, loss of milestones, disease management, healthcare utilization, quality of life, and caregiver burden for 116 participants. Results show a high disease burden, but a relatively short time to diagnosis. Despite the challenges faced by families impacted by Leigh syndrome, participants, in general, are described as having a good quality of life and caregivers are overall resilient, while also reporting a significant amount of stress. Conclusion: This registry provides a straightforward, no-cost mechanism for data sharing and contacting patients for clinical trials or research participation, which is important given the recruitment challenges for clinical trials for rare diseases. This is the first publication to present results from a global patient registry for Leigh Syndrome, with details on a variety of patient-specific and caregiver outcomes reported for the first time. Additionally, this registry is the first for any mitochondrial disease with nearly 70% of participants residing outside of the United States. Future efforts include continued publication of results and further collaboration with patients, industry partners, and researchers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European Commission have developed successful orphan drug legislation to promote the research, development, and marketing approval of drugs to treat rare diseases. Central to these regulations are the concepts of structural similarity and clinical superiority/significant benefit to achieve orphan drug exclusivity. However, differences in health authority expectations remain regarding the qualification for an orphan drug designation, defining structural similarity, and demonstrating clinical superiority/significant benefit. These differences can create sponsor company uncertainty regarding the approvability of products (e.g., blocking risk by an existing orphan product) and divergent orphan drug decisions among health authorities. A comprehensive assessment of current regulations, case studies in exclusivities, and recommendations for improvement are presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study explored the experiences of adults with diverse rare diseases (RDs) and RD caregivers with barriers and facilitators to healthcare access in the United States (US), including during the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic, and their recommendations for improving access. Results: Adults with RDs and parents/caregivers to children with RDs (N = 1128) completed open-ended survey items. Responses were analyzed using thematic analysis. The primary theme identified regarding barriers to healthcare was "lack"; participants reported challenges in obtaining an accurate diagnosis, effective management/treatment, health insurance coverage, and social support. The primary theme identified regarding facilitators was "finally"; participants reported a need for persistence to access a diagnosis, RD experts, as well as social support and advocacy. Recommendations for improving healthcare for RDs mirrored the barriers and facilitators identified, including improving knowledge/awareness of RDs and investing in RD research that could improve diagnosis and treatment. Participants' healthcare experiences varied widely during the COVID-19 pandemic, with some reporting that telehealth improved care and others reporting disruption due to telehealth. Conclusions: Even though individual diagnoses are rare, there are shared challenges to healthcare access and common opportunities for improvement. Policy recommendations regarding RD healthcare focus on improving affordable and timely access to knowledgeable providers, diagnosis, and medications/treatments.

Objectives: To examine ultraorphan drugs in terms of incremental health, costs, and cost-effectiveness compared with more prevalent disease drugs., Methods: We identified Food and Drug Administration drug approvals from 1999 to 2019. For drugs approved for multiple indications, we considered each drug-indication pair separately. Utilizing Food and Drug Administration's orphan drug designation and US disease prevalence, we categorized drug-indication pairs as: ultraorphan (<10 000 patients), "other" orphan (≥10 000 and <200 000), and nonorphan (≥200 000). We searched the PubMed database for cost-effectiveness analyses and comparative effectiveness studies. We excluded manufacturer-funded studies. We extracted estimates of incremental health gains in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental costs associated with drug-indication pairs compared with the standard of care at the time of their approval. We compared QALY gains, added costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) using the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U (MWU), and Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) tests., Results: Median incremental QALYs, costs, and ICERs differed across nonorphan, "other" orphan, and ultraorphan categories (Kruskal-Wallis P < .01). Compared with nonorphan drugs, ultraorphan drugs had larger QALY gains (0.700 vs 0.050, MWU P < .01, KS P < .01), larger costs ($172 231 vs $3360, MWU P < .01, KS P < .01), and larger ICERs ($1 216 184/QALY vs $114 061/QALY, MWU P < .01, KS P <.01). Compared with "other" orphan drugs, ultraorphan drugs had larger QALY gains (0.700 vs 0.310, MWU P =.65, KS P =.32), larger costs ($172 231 vs $69 308, MWU P = .03, KS P = .03), and larger ICERs ($1 216 184/QALY vs $223 472/QALY, MWU P <.01, KS P <.01)., Conclusions: Novel ultraorphan drugs typically offer larger incremental health gains than drugs for more prevalent diseases, but because of their substantial added costs, are typically less cost-effective., Competing Interests: Author Disclosures Author disclosure forms can be accessed below in the Supplemental Material section., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Social determinants of health (SDoH) can impact the vulnerable pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) population, especially during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Providers' understanding of SDoH at the point of care and their impact is unknown. We conducted semi‐structured virtual interviews with US clinicians at 17 pulmonary hypertension (PH) centers and one patient advocate from the Pulmonary Hypertension Association. We sought participants' perspective on SDoH in PAH and their impact. Transcripts were developed and analyzed for key themes to assess potential policy implications. Participants served a large PAH population and demonstrated high awareness of SDoH and its impact on treatment and outcomes. They reported that patients' SDoH, including socioeconomic status, health insurance, access to health care, education levels, health literacy, employment status, and insecurities associated with housing, food, transportation, and family support, impacted health and well‐being. COVID‐19‐related social isolation, mental health, and substance abuse contributed to significant inequities in care provision and outcomes. While telemedicine helped clinicians manage patients remotely during the pandemic, there was a concern for patients with limited access to this medium. Participants reported no formal screening for SDoH at the point of care. With the recognition and the desire to act upon health inequities associated with SDoH, participants felt that it was vital for their centers to have a dedicated PH social worker and support staff to optimize care and outcomes. An approach that integrates SDoH in PAH care management, streamlined through institutional policy, could address health disparities leading to improved healthcare access, outcomes, and quality of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Congenital hyperinsulinism (HI) is a rare disease affecting newborns. HI causes severe hypoglycemia due to the overproduction of insulin. The signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia in HI babies is often not discovered until brain damage has already occurred. Prolonged hypoglycemia from HI can even lead to death. Disease management is often complex with a high burden on caregivers. Treatment options are extremely limited and often require long hospital stays to devise. Cascading from suboptimal treatments and diagnostic practices are a host of other problems and challenges that many with HI and their families experience including continued fear of hypoglycemia and feeding problems. The aim of this paper is (1) to describe the current challenges of living with HI including diagnosis and disease management told from the perspective of people who live with the condition (2), to provide family stories of life with HI, and (3) to share how a rare disease patient organization, Congenital Hyperinsulinism International (CHI) is working to improve the lives of HI patients and their families. CHI is a United States based nonprofit organization with a global focus. The paper communicates the programs the patient advocacy organization has put into place to support HI families through its virtual and in-person gatherings. The organization also helps individuals access diagnostics, medical experts, and treatments. CHI also raises awareness of HI to improve patient outcomes with information about HI and prolonged hypoglycemia in twenty-three languages. CHI drives innovation for new and better treatments by funding research pilot grants, conducting research through the HI Global Registry, and providing patient experience expertise to researchers developing new treatments. The organization is also the sponsor of the CHI Collaborative Research Network which brings medical and scientific experts together for the development of a patient-focused prioritized research agenda. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To provide a comprehensive assessment of the total economic burden of rare diseases (RD) in the United States (U.S.) in 2019. We followed a prevalence-based approach that combined the prevalence of 379 RDs with the per-person direct medical and indirect costs, to derive the national economic burden by patient age and type of RD. To estimate the prevalence and the direct medical cost of RD, we used claims data from three sources: Medicare 5% Standard Analytical File, Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System, and Optum claims data for the privately insured. To estimate indirect and non-medical cost components, we worked with the rare disease community to design and implement a primary survey. Results: There were an estimated 15.5 million U.S. children (N = 1,322,886) and adults (N = 14,222,299) with any of the 379 RDs in 2019 with a total economic burden of $997 billion, including a direct medical cost of $449 billion (45%), $437 billion (44%) in indirect costs, $73 billion in non-medical costs (7%), and $38 billion (4%) in healthcare costs not covered by insurance. The top drivers for excess medical costs associated with RD are hospital inpatient care and prescription medication; the top indirect cost categories are labor market productivity losses due to absenteeism, presenteeism, and early retirement. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the scale of the RD economic burden and call for immediate attention from the scientific communities, policy leaders, and other key stakeholders such as health care providers and employers, to think innovatively and collectively, to identify new ways to help improve the care, management, and treatment of these often-devastating diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) such as lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) are conditions caused by deficiency of one or more key enzymes, cofactors, or transporters involved in a specific metabolic pathway. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) provides an exogenous source of the affected enzyme and is one of the most effective treatment options for IEMs. In this paper, we review the first-in-human (FIH) protocols for ERT drug development programs supporting 20 Biologic License Applications (BLA) approved by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the period of May 1994 to September 2023. We surveyed study design elements across these FIH protocols including study population, dosage form, dose selection, treatment duration, immunogenicity, biomarkers, and study follow-up. A total of 18 FIH trials from 20 BLAs were identified and of those, 72% (13/18) used single ascending dose (SAD) and/or multiple ascending dose (MAD) study design, 83% (15/18) had a primary objective of assessing the safety and tolerability, 72% (13/18) included clinical endpoint assessments, and 94% (17/18) included biomarker assessments as secondary or exploratory endpoints. Notably, the majority of ERT products tested the approved route of administration and the approved dose was tested in 83% (15/18) of FIH trials. At last, we offer considerations for the design of FIH studies., (Published 2024. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.)

Characterization analysis of 87 pivotal clinical trials for 72 novel orphan drugs (76 orphan indications) approved by the FDA from 2017 to 2023 revealed that the clinical trial evidence supporting FDA orphan drug approvals often lacked high-quality designs, which frequently did not incorporate randomization, blinding, placebo or no treatment control, or clinical endpoint-driven methodologies. Additionally, regulatory flexibility was observed in the quantity of clinical trial evidence required, which included choices such as a single trial plus confirmatory evidence, one large multicenter trial or at least two trials. Furthermore, the overall strength of the clinical trial evidence exhibited variations across different orphan drugs and indications, influenced by features such as the therapeutic area and whether the orphan drug was granted accelerated approvals., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

A rare disease, or orphan disease, in the United States is a condition with a national prevalence of fewer than 200,000 diagnoses. As therapies for rare diseases are developed and brought to market, pharmacists should understand the challenges of drug development for rare diseases and aid in educating patients about the approval process for rare disease therapies. Developing drugs for treating rare diseases presents unique challenges in proving the drug's safety and efficacy with adequate study design, power, and validity. Results of the clinical trials for rare diseases may be weakened by small patient populations, limited disease information, and difficulty defining end points and biomarkers. In addition to investigational barriers, pharmaceutical companies face financial barriers in justifying the investment of bringing a rare disease therapy to market. Federal programs, such as the Orphan Drug Act of 1983, expedited review, the Rare Pediatric Disease Priority Review Vouchers (RPD PRV) program, and the 21st Century Cures Act, give pharmaceutical companies motivation to develop therapies for rare diseases. The objective of this article is to provide pharmacists with an understanding of the challenges in designing clinical trials for drugs for rare diseases and discuss federal programs that address efforts to develop safe and efficacious drugs for rare diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Because transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) poses unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, referral of patients with known or suspected disease to specialized amyloidosis centers is recommended. These centers have developed strategic practices to provide multidisciplinary comprehensive care, but their best practices have not yet been well studied as a group. Methods: A qualitative survey was conducted by telephone/email from October 2019 to February 2020 among eligible healthcare providers with experience in the management of ATTR-CM at US amyloidosis centers, patients with ATTR-CM treated at amyloidosis centers, and patient advocates from amyloidosis patient support groups. Results: Fifteen cardiologists and 9 nurse practitioners/nurses from 15 selected amyloidosis centers participated in the survey, with 16 patients and 4 patient advocates. Among participating healthcare providers, the most frequently cited center best practices were diagnostic capability, multidisciplinary care, and time spent on patient care; the greatest challenges involved coordination of patient care. Patients described the "ideal" amyloidosis program as one that provides physicians with expertise in ATTR-CM, sufficient time with patients, comprehensive patient care, and opportunities to participate in research/clinical trials. The majority of centers host patient support group meetings, and patient advocacy groups provide support for centers with physician/patient education and research. Conclusions: Amyloidosis centers offer comprehensive care based on staff expertise in ATTR-CM, a multidisciplinary approach, advanced diagnostics, and time dedicated to patient care and education. Raising awareness of amyloidosis centers' best practices among healthcare providers can reinforce the benefits of early referral and comprehensive care for patients with ATTR-CM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To investigate prevalence estimates and incidence rates (IRs) for SSc and SSc-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) cohorts and describe patient characteristics, immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and comorbid outcomes among incident SSc and SSc-ILD cohorts. Methods Data were obtained from the US IBM MarketScan (2008–2017) claims database using algorithms developed with expert consultation. For the SSc cohort, newly diagnosed patients (aged ≥18 years) had one or more diagnostic claim for SSc. For the SSc-ILD cohort, patients had an additional ILD claim. Sensitivity analyses using two or more claims or alternative ILD diagnostic codes were also conducted. Results When requiring one or more diagnostic claim, the prevalence of SSc and SSc-ILD per 100 000 persons was 72.1 and 19.0. The IR for SSc and SSc-ILD per 100 000 person-years was 18.3 and 4.3. Sensitivity analyses requiring two or more claims yielded much lower prevalence (SSc: 41.5; SSc-ILD: 13.3) and IR (SSc: 8.8; SSc-ILD: 1.6) estimates. Patients with SSc-ILD were older, with increased comorbidities and diagnostic procedures at baseline. MTX and MMF were the most common ISTs; 12.7% of the SSc-ILD cohort received therapy at baseline vs 8.2% for SSc. A total of 42.5% and 45.0% of the SSc and SSc-ILD cohorts, respectively, started a stable IST regimen and 21.7% and 19.4% of these had an escalation. Skin disorders were the most common comorbid outcome in both cohorts during follow-up. Conclusions SSc, with or without associated ILD, is a rare disease in the US. Newly diagnosed patients with SSc-ILD had received more IST and had more comorbidities compared with newly diagnosed SSc. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The process of developing therapies to treat rare diseases is fraught with financial, regulatory, and logistical challenges that have limited our ability to build effective treatments. Recently, a novel type of therapy called antisense therapy has shown immense potential for the treatment of rare diseases, particularly through single-patient N-of-1 trials. Several N-of-1 antisense therapies have been developed recently for rare diseases, including the landmark study of milasen. In response to the success of N-of-1 antisense therapy, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has developed unique guidelines specifically for the development of antisense therapy to treat N-of-1 rare diseases. This policy change establishes a strong foundation for future therapy development and addresses some of the major limitations that previously hindered the development of therapies for rare diseases.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic offered an epidemiological opportunity to evaluate if isolation and masking affected John Cunningham (JC) virus transmission., Objective: This study aimed to assess the proportion of natalizumab-treated patients who converted to a positive anti-JCV antibody serostatus before and during the pandemic., Methods: Data from TYSABRI Outreach: Unified Commitment to Health (TOUCH) for 22,375 US patients treated with natalizumab with anti-JCV antibody records were assessed in epochs annually from 2017 to 2022., Results: Pre-pandemic anti-JCV antibody serostatus change was observed for 7.4%-7.7%. During the first and second years of the pandemic, 7.3% and 7.2% of patients' serostatus changed, respectively., Conclusion: The proportion of patients with anti-JCV antibody serostatus change did not significantly differ during the first 2 years of the pandemic compared with prior years. In contrast to seasonal influenza, masking and social distancing had no discernable effect on JCV serostatus change., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: S.C.K. reports consulting or advisory work with Biogen, EMD Serono, Genentech, Genzyme/Sanofi, Novartis, Octave, and TG Therapeutics; nonpromotional speaking with Biogen, EMD Serono, and Genentech; grant and research support from Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Novartis, and Sanofi. S.S., F.H., J.S., T.J.K., K.W., and R.L.A. are the employees of and may hold stock and/or stock options in Biogen.

Introduction: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a rare, severe progressive neuromuscular disease. Health insurance claims allow characterization of population-level real-world outcomes, based on observed healthcare resource use. An analysis of data specific to those with Medicaid insurance is presently unavailable. The objective was to describe the real-world clinical course of DMD based on claims data from Medicaid-insured individuals in the USA., Methods: Individuals with DMD were identified from the MarketScan Multi-State Medicaid datasets (2013-2018). Diagnosis and procedure codes from healthcare claims were used to characterize the occurrence of DMD-relevant clinical observations; categories were scoliosis, cardiovascular-related, respiratory and severe respiratory-related, and neurologic/neuropsychiatric. Age-restricted analyses were conducted to focus on the ages at which DMD-relevant clinical observations were more likely to be captured, and to better understand the impact of both age and follow-up time., Results: Of 2007 patients with DMD identified, median (interquartile range) age at index was 14 (9-20) years, and median follow-up was 3.1 (1.6-4.7) years. Neurologic and neuropsychiatric observations were most frequently identified, among 49.3% of the cohort; followed by cardiovascular (48.5%), respiratory (38.1%), scoliosis (36.3%), and severe respiratory (25.0%). Prevalence estimates for each category were higher when analyzed within age-restricted subgroups; and increased as follow-up time increased., Conclusions: This study is the first to use diagnosis and procedure codes from real-world Medicaid claims to document the clinical course in DMD. Findings were consistent with previously published estimates from commercially insured populations and clinical registries; and contribute to the expanding body of real-world evidence around clinical progression of patients with DMD., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had unprecedented impact on the provision of medical care for genetic disorders. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of the pandemic on neurofibromatosis (NF) care and research.Methods: Sixty-three United States NF clinics were surveyed to identify the impact of the pandemic on clinician role, patient volume, continuity of guideline-driven surveillance, research protocols, and use of (and satisfaction with) telehealth for the delivery of NF care.Results: Fifty-two clinic directors or their representatives completed the survey (83% response rate). About 2/3 of the clinics reported a greater than 50% decrease in the number of available patient appointments, and modified clinical surveillance and research protocols. Fifty-one clinics (98%) newly instituted telehealth during the pandemic. Barriers to telehealth prior to the pandemic were insurance reimbursement concerns and lack of infrastructure. Since telehealth was initiated, high provider satisfaction was reported with ease of use. The most common area of concern was related to inability to perform a physical examination.Conclusion: Results show marked impacts on NF care and research since the beginning of the pandemic, with potential long-term changes related to the introduction (or adoption) of telehealth for clinical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS), also known as giant-cell tumour of the tendon sheath (GCTT), is a rare, benign proliferative tumour affecting the inner lining of synovial joints and tendon sheets. Information on treatment needs of PVNS patients to inform drug development is currently scarce. We conducted an exploratory qualitative study with PVNS patients to generate insights into the objective and emotional aspects related to their medical journey and experiences of living with this disease.Methods: A 4-day study using an online bulletin board (OBB), an asynchronous, online qualitative research platform, was conducted with patients recruited via physician referral who underwent screening questions to ensure eligibility for the study and willingness to participate. The discussion was moderated, was structured and allowed open answers in response to other participants' posts.Results: Eleven patients (4 from the USA, 4 from the UK and 3 from Canada; 45% female), aged 28-57 years, suffering from PVNS for 2-27 years participated in the study. Key patient insights from the study were: (1) pain was the topmost, spontaneous thought that the participants associated with PVNS, constituting a significant emotional and psychological burden; (2) surgery (arthroscopy) did not completely ameliorate symptoms associated with PVNS, as the relapse rate was high in these patients; (3) PVNS has a substantial negative financial impact on patients, their families and the healthcare system; (4) orthopaedic specialists/surgeons predominantly managed PVNS, as surgery is currently the only therapeutic option.Conclusion: PVNS patients expressed an urgent need for a medical drug treatment, which can reduce pain, avoid relapses and provide an alternative to surgery, the current standard of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare neuromuscular disease with a rapidly evolving treatment landscape. To better meet the needs of trial sponsors and the patient community in the United States (US) in this evolving context, Cure SMA established a clinical trial readiness program for new and prospective SMA clinical trial sites. Program development was informed by a review of the SMA clinical trial landscape, successful NMD trial and care networks, and factors important to effective trial conduct in SMA. The program was piloted in 2018 with a virtual site readiness evaluation, a trial readiness toolkit, and a readiness program for physical therapists and clinical evaluators. Nine US research hospitals participated in the pilot. Cure SMA evaluated the pilot program and resources through feedback surveys, which supported the program's relevance and value. Since 2018, the program has been expanded with additional sites, new best practices toolkits, and workshops. In partnership with Cure SMA, SMA Europe is also extending programming to European countries. The program is significant as an example of a patient advocacy group working successfully with pharmaceutical companies, other patient advocacy organizations, and research hospitals to promote trial readiness, and may serve as a model for organizations in other regions and diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Growing interest in therapeutic development for rare diseases necessitate a systematic approach to the collection and curation of natural history data that can be applied consistently across this group of heterogenous rare diseases. In this study, we discuss the challenges facing natural history studies for leukodystrophies and detail a novel standardized approach to creating a longitudinal natural history study using existing medical records. Prospective studies are uniquely challenging for rare diseases. Delays in diagnosis and overall rarity limit the timely collection of natural history data. When feasible, prospective studies are often cross-sectional rather than longitudinal and are unlikely to capture pre- or early- symptomatic disease trajectories, limiting their utility in characterizing the full natural history of the disease. Therapeutic development in leukodystrophies is subject to these same obstacles. The Global Leukodystrophy Initiative Clinical Trials Network (GLIA-CTN) comprises of a network of research institutions across the United States, supported by a multi-center biorepository protocol, to map the longitudinal clinical course of disease across leukodystrophies. As part of GLIA-CTN, we developed Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) that delineated all study processes related to staff training, source documentation, and data sharing. Additionally, the SOP detailed the standardized approach to data extraction including diagnosis, clinical presentation, and medical events, such as age at gastrostomy tube placement. The key variables for extraction were selected through face validity, and common electronic case report forms (eCRF) across leukodystrophies were created to collect analyzable data. To enhance the depth of the data, clinical notes are extracted into "original" and "imputed" encounters, with imputed encounter referring to a historic event (e.g., loss of ambulation 3 months prior). Retrospective Functional Assessments were assigned by child neurologists, using a blinded dual-rater approach and score discrepancies were adjudicated by a third rater. Upon completion of extraction, data source verification is performed. Data missingness was evaluated using statistics. The proposed methodology will enable us to leverage existing medical records to address the persistent gap in natural history data within this unique disease group, allow for assessment of clinical trajectory both pre- and post-formal diagnosis, and promote recruitment of larger cohorts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Major clinical events (MCEs) related to long-chain fatty acid oxidation disorders (LC-FAOD) in triheptanoin clinical trials include inpatient or emergency room (ER) visits for three major clinical manifestations: rhabdomyolysis, hypoglycemia, and cardiomyopathy. However, outcomes data outside of LC-FAOD clinical trials are limited. The non-interventional cohort LC-FAOD Odyssey study examines data derived from US medical records and patient reported outcomes to quantify LC-FAOD burden according to management strategy including MCE frequency and healthcare resource utilization (HRU). Thirty-four patients were analyzed of which 21 and 29 patients had received triheptanoin and/or medium chain triglycerides (MCT), respectively. 36% experienced MCEs while receiving triheptanoin versus 54% on MCT. Total mean annualized MCE rates on triheptanoin and MCT were 0.1 and 0.7, respectively. Annualized disease-related inpatient and ER events were lower on triheptanoin (0.2, 0.3, respectively) than MCT (1.2, 1.0, respectively). Patients were managed more in an outpatient setting on triheptanoin (8.9 annualized outpatient visits) vs MCT (7.9). Overall, this shows that those with LC-FAOD in the Odyssey program experienced fewer MCEs and less HRU in inpatient and ER settings during triheptanoin-treated periods compared with the MCT-treated periods. The MCE rate was lower after initiation of triheptanoin, consistent with clinical trials. • Long-chain fatty acid oxidation disorders are a group of rare metabolic disorders. • Treatments include medium-chain triglyceride (MCT) supplementation and triheptanoin. • Lower rates of disease manifestation were reported while on triheptanoin than MCT. • Lower rates of hospitalization were reported while on triheptanoin than MCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Fabry disease (FD) is a rare X-linked lysosomal storage disorder with a heterogeneous clinical presentation. Patients with FD may exhibit early signs/symptoms including neuropathic pain, gastrointestinal complaints, and dermatologic manifestations. FD may ultimately progress to renal, neurologic, and cardiac dysfunction. Current treatments for FD have significantly improved the management and outcomes for patients with FD, but important clinical and convenience limitations still exist., Methods: To illuminate the impact of FD on daily life from the patient's perspective, we asked adult patients (≥ 18 years old) with FD in the United States and Canada to complete a 33-question online survey to assess patient-reported disease severity, management, and treatment outcomes., Results: A total of 280 respondents with FD completed the survey; they had a mean age of 47 years, and 68% (191/280) were women. Most were currently receiving FD treatment (84%, 234/280) with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) (89%, 208/234) or chaperone therapy (11%, 26/234). Common symptoms included low energy/fatigue (72%, 201/280), tingling (62%, 174/280) or pain in the hands/feet (60%, 168/280), ringing in ears/hearing loss (54%, 151/280), general body pains/pain crises (51%, 143/280), and abdominal/stomach pain (50%, 140/280). More than half (51%, 144/280) of respondents reported their symptoms as bothersome (38%, 106/280) or difficult to control (14%, 38/280). Temporary symptom worsening between infusions was reported by about half of respondents: 51% (108/211) currently receiving ERT and 48% (14/29) previously receiving ERT. Only 48% (59/122) of respondents reported their symptom worsening to their physician. Of those who reported it, 41% (24/59) said that their physician prescribed medication to manage their symptoms or changed their treatment regimen., Conclusions: Our analysis highlights the gap between current standard-of-care in disease monitoring and patient perception of disease progression among patients with FD. This information may be helpful for healthcare providers and drug developers seeking to improve the care of patients with FD by addressing unmet needs of high relevance., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Due to the low prevalence of rare diseases (RDs) and the small number of individuals affected with a RD, challenges complicate the development of and accessibility to medications and medical devices to prevent, identify, treat or cure these RDs. The aims of this study were to analyse and compare regulations and policies related to accessibility of orphan drugs (ODs) in different countries which have policies or systems in place which are specific for RDs and ODs in Europe and the United States (US). Methods: A comprehensive literature review was carried out. A total of 20 120 articles which contained information about accessibility and legislations, regulations and governmental policies related to RDs and ODs were retrieved. Key findings: Sixty‐eight articles were included in this study. Classification of information related to 24 countries was based on six themes: OD policies, marketing authorisations, incentives offered, pricing of ODs, reimbursement and pharmacovigilance. The EU and United States have adopted policies and regulations aimed to improve OD accessibility in the last 20 years. Although all included countries had an OD legislation, only 16 countries had an OD or RD plan in place. Conclusions: Comparison of different legislations and policies in each country can be used to identify and address deficiencies in the field of RDs and improve accessibility of ODs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: About 30 million individuals in the United States are living with a rare disease, which by definition have a prevalence of 200,000 or fewer cases in the United States ([National Organization for Rare Disorders], [About NORD], [2016]). Disease heterogeneity and geographic dispersion add to the difficulty of completing robust studies in small populations. Improving the ability to conduct research on rare diseases would have a significant impact on population health. The purpose of this paper is to raise awareness of methodological approaches that can address the challenges to conducting robust research on rare diseases.Approach: We conducted a landscape review of available methodological and analytic approaches to address the challenges of rare disease research. Our objectives were to: 1. identify algorithms for matching study design to rare disease attributes and the methodological approaches applicable to these algorithms; 2. draw inferences on how research communities and infrastructure can contribute to the efficiency of research on rare diseases; and 3. to describe methodological approaches in the rare disease portfolio of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), a funder promoting both rare disease research and research infrastructure.Results: We identified three algorithms for matching study design to rare disease or intervention characteristics (Gagne, et.al, BMJ 349:g6802, 2014); (Gupta, et.al, J Clin Epidemiol 64:1085-1094, 2011); (Cornu, et. al, Orphet J Rare Dis 8:48,2012) and summarized the applicable methodological and analytic approaches. From this literature we were also able to draw inferences on how an effective research infrastructure can set an agenda, prioritize studies, accelerate accrual, catalyze patient engagement and terminate poorly performing studies. Of the 24 rare disease projects in the PCORI portfolio, 11 are randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using standard designs. Thirteen are observational studies using case-control, prospective cohort, or natural history designs. PCORI has supported the development of 9 Patient-Powered Research Networks (PPRNs) focused on rare diseases.Conclusion: Matching research design to attributes of rare diseases and interventions can facilitate the completion of RCTs that are adequately powered. An effective research infrastructure can improve efficiency and avoid waste in rare disease research. Our review of the PCORI research portfolio demonstrates that it is feasible to conduct RCTs in rare disease. However, most of these studies are using standard RCT designs. This suggests that use of a broader array of methodological approaches to RCTs --such as adaptive trials, cross-over trials, and early escape designs can improve the productivity of robust research in rare diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The NIH Undiagnosed Diseases Program (UDP) aims to provide diagnoses to patients who have previously received exhaustive evaluations yet remain undiagnosed. Patients undergo procedural anesthesia for deep phenotyping for analysis with genomic testing., Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to determine the safety and benefit of procedural anesthesia in pediatric patients in the UDP. Adverse perioperative events were classified as anesthesia-related complications or peri-procedural complications. The contribution of procedures performed under anesthesia to arriving at a diagnosis was also determined., Results: From 2008 to 2020, 249 pediatric patients in the UDP underwent anesthesia for diagnostic procedures. The majority had a severe systemic disease (American Society for Anesthesiology status III, 79%) and/or a neurologic condition (91%). Perioperative events occurred in 45 patients; six of these were attributed to anesthesia. All patients recovered fully without sequelae. Nearly half of the 249 patients (49%) received a diagnosis, and almost all these diagnoses (88%) took advantage of information gleaned from procedures performed under anesthesia., Conclusions: The benefits of anesthesia involving multiple diagnostic procedures in a well-coordinated, multidisciplinary, research setting, such as in the pediatric UDP, outweigh the risks., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Rare disease (RD) patients face significant unmet therapeutic needs worldwide. However, orphan drugs approved in the United States, but not approved or developed in Japan, have increased rapidly with recently increasing US approvals, indicating greater RD drug loss in Japan. US/EU-based startups have become key players in RD drug R&D, significantly contributing to this drug loss trend. They successfully develop drugs in the United States by combining in-licensing with in-house drug discovery. Out-licensing to Japanese companies or large pharma is critical for expansion into Japan, with successes attributed to drug innovation, target indications, and transactional capabilities. These findings highlight the need to foster partnerships with startups and cultivate an ecosystem in Japan that nurtures local startups, to address drug loss and ensure access to promising drugs., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the United States, rare disease (RD) is defined as a condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals. Collectively, RD affects an estimated 30 million Americans. A significant portion of RD has an underlying genetic cause; however, this may go undiagnosed. To better serve these patients, the Mayo Clinic Program for Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases (PRaUD) was created under the auspices of the Center for Individualized Medicine (CIM) aiming to integrate genomics into subspecialty practice including targeted genetic testing, research, and education., Methods: Patients were identified by subspecialty healthcare providers from 11 clinical divisions/departments. Targeted multi-gene panels or custom exome/genome-based panels were utilized. To support the goals of PRaUD, a new clinical service model, the Genetic Testing and Counseling (GTAC) unit, was established to improve access and increase efficiency for genetic test facilitation. The GTAC unit includes genetic counselors, genetic counseling assistants, genetic nurses, and a medical geneticist. Patients receive abbreviated point-of-care genetic counseling and testing through a partnership with subspecialty providers., Results: Implementation of PRaUD began in 2018 and GTAC unit launched in 2020 to support program expansion. Currently, 29 RD clinical indications are included in 11 specialty divisions/departments with over 142 referring providers. To date, 1152 patients have been evaluated with an overall solved or likely solved rate of 17.5% and as high as 66.7% depending on the phenotype. Noteworthy, 42.7% of the solved or likely solved patients underwent changes in medical management and outcome based on genetic test results., Conclusion: Implementation of PRaUD and GTAC have enabled subspecialty practices advance expertise in RD where genetic counselors have not historically been embedded in practice. Democratizing access to genetic testing and counseling can broaden the reach of patients with RD and increase the diagnostic yield of such indications leading to better medical management as well as expanding research opportunities., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Since 1983, the Orphan Product Grants Program, administered by the US Food and Drug Administration, provides funding for clinical trials and natural history studies in rare diseases. The COVID-19 pandemic created new challenges in rare disease product development. This study sought to determine the effects of the pandemic on rare disease studies using data from grantees of this program, and determine lessons learned that can potentially be applied to future trials in rare diseases., Methods: All grants that were being funded by the Orphan Products Grants Program between March 2020 and March 2021 were included in the study. Data was gathered from grantees and described the effects of the pandemic on multiple aspects of the studies including enrollment, patient follow-up, protocol, and budget., Results: There were 62 grants active during the study period, and of these 54 (87%) were clinical trials and 8 (13%) were natural history studies. 94% of the grantees reported their studies being affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the addition of virtual capabilities was reported by 34 (55%) of grantees., Conclusions: This study suggested two important lessons learned. First, virtual capabilities, when appropriate, can be an important component of trials because they decrease the travel burden on participants and reduce in-person risks, which should increase patient recruitment and retention. Second, building in flexibility in clinical trials is critical in the post-COVID era and could include increasing the use of multi-site trials, clinical networks, and innovative designs and collaborations to speed up trials without compromising study data., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Orphan drugs designed to treat rare diseases are often overpriced per patient. Novel treatments are sometimes even more expensive for patients with ultra-rare diseases, in part due to the limited number of patients. Pharmaceutical companies that develop a patented life-saving drug are in a position to charge a very high price, which, at best, may enable these companies to further develop drugs for use in rare disease. However, is there a limit to how much a life-saving drug should cost annually per patient? Government interventions and regulations may opt to withhold a life-saving drug solely due to its high price and cost-effectiveness. Processes related to drug pricing, reimbursement, and thereby availability, vary between countries, thus having implications on patient care. These processes are discussed, with specific focus on three drugs used in pediatric nephrology: agalsidase beta (for Fabry disease), eculizumab (for atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome), and cysteamine bitartrate (for cystinosis). Access to and costs of orphan drugs have most profound implications for patients, but also for their physicians, hospitals, insurance policies, and society at large, particularly from financial and ethical standpoints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Rare rheumatologic diseases are a heterogeneous group of conditions associated with high morbidity. As a whole group, rare rheumatologic diseases afflict millions of people demanding for effective therapies. Therefore, we analyzed the impact of the US Orphan Drug Act on the development of anti-rheumatic orphan drugs.Methods: Analysis of the FDA database for orphan drug designations.Results: In the last three decades, out of 77 orphan drug designations, 14 orphan drug approvals were granted by the FDA for the treatment of rare rheumatologic disorders, i.e. juvenile idiopathic arthritis (N = 5), cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (N = 3), uveitis (N = 3), familial Mediterranean fever (N = 1), anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (N = 1), and xerostomia and keratoconjunctivitis sicca in Sjögren's syndrome (N = 1). Mean time (standard deviation) from designation to approval was 3.9 (2.81) [range 1 … 12] years. Number of FDA-approved small molecules (N = 6, 43 %) and biologics (N = 8, 57 %) was comparable. Almost every fifth (19 %) orphan drug designation was withdrawn. Despite the rarity of conditions, 13/14 pivotal studies were randomized controlled trials.Conclusions: Orphan drug development is challenging: thirty years of US orphan drug act supported the development and FDA approval of 14 orphan drug programs with anti-rheumatic compounds for six rheumatologic diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Rare disease is a general term for a disease that affects a small number of people but recognized as a global public health priority. Governments worldwide are paying more and more attention to the academical research and drug investment of rare diseases. The conduct of rare disease clinical trials is still difficult, despite the promotion of government policies and the awakening of social consciousness. In this article, we outlined the characteristics and obstacles of clinical trials of rare diseases in China and expected to provide reference for subsequent clinical trials in this field., Results: In recent years, China has made some progress in clinical trials of rare diseases in the past 10 years. There were 481 clinical trials on rare diseases in total, covering more than 10 rare diseases with high incidence. Clinical trial applications on rare diseases for a total of 481 were submitted and with an average annual growth rate of 28.2% from 2013 to 2022. The number of clinical trial application for rare diseases in 2016 dramatically increased by 80% compared to 2015 due to the policy document issued by China for clinical research in rare diseases in 2015. Besides, about 70% of applications registering for clinical trials could recruit subjects as expected. Despite this, the number of clinical trials of rare diseases in China was less compared with the United States, Europe and Japan, and the types of infant drugs were limited to biological products and chemical drugs lacking other new treatments., Conclusions: Efforts have been made in recent years to develop clinical research on rare diseases in China. The number of clinical trials for rare diseases in China was growing steadily every year, which was inseparable from the support of the country, society and rare disease patients. Still, there was a large gap between China and other developed countries in this field and this merit further investigation., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Evaluating the clinical benefit of interventions for conditions with heterogeneous symptom and impact presentations is challenging. The same condition can present differently across and within individuals over time. This occurs frequently in rare diseases. The purpose of this review was to identify (1) assessment approaches used in clinical trials to address heterogeneous manifestations that could be relevant in rare disease research and (2) US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved labeling claims that used these approaches., Methods: A targeted literature review was conducted examining peer-reviewed publications and FDA-approved labeling claims from January 2002 to July 2020, focusing on claims incorporating clinical outcome assessments. Approaches were then assessed for their potential application in rare diseases., Results: A total of 6 assessment approaches were identified: composite or other multicomponent endpoints, multidomain responder index, most bothersome symptom (MBS), goal attainment scaling, sliding dichotomy, and adequate relief. A total of 59 FDA-approved labeling claims associated with these approaches were identified: composite or other multicomponent endpoints (n=49), MBS (n=9), and adequate relief (n=1). A total of 10 FDA-approved labeling claims, all using multicomponent endpoints, were identified for rare diseases., Conclusions: Multicomponent, MBS, and adequate relief have been included in FDA-approved labeling claims. Multicomponent endpoints, including composite endpoints, were the most frequent way to address heterogeneous manifestations of both common and rare diseases. MBS may be acceptable to regulators, whereas multidomain responder index is unlikely to be. The goal attainment scaling and adequate relief approaches may have potential utility in rare disease trials, assuming the theoretical and statistical challenges inherent in each approach are managed., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

In life-threatening conditions such as cancer and rare diseases, where there is no cure and no U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapy, patients sometimes seek access to an unapproved, experimental therapy through expanded access programs as their last, best hope for treatment to save their lives. Since the 1980s, the policies and the practice of expanded access have evolved, but a common challenge remains that there is no obligation, and often little incentive, for manufacturers to offer expanded access programs, especially for individual patients. In recent years, online campaigns seeking access to an experimental therapy have become more common, paralleling growth in and representing an intersection of social media, digital health, and patient advocacy.Mackey and Schoenfeld have examined the evolution of expanded access policy, practice, and trends, as well as case studies of online campaigns to access experimental therapies, to arrive at several recommendations for the future of expanded access. This commentary puts their paper in context, examines their recommendations, and suggests further reforms.Please see related article: https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-016-0568-8. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many new drugs have been approved over the past decade for rare or orphan diseases. The passage of the Orphan Drug Act (ODA) in 1983 has provided key economic and regulatory incentives to provide medicines for patients who are suffering from rare diseases that may not be commercially attractive for research and development. We have analyzed 497 novel drugs approved from 2010 - June 13, 2022, of which 220 were given orphan designation status. We discuss trends over this time period, potential risks for long development times, and provide example case studies of successful development and launch of novel drugs for rare diseases., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the financial impact of utilizing rpFVIII or rFVIIa during a hospital admission for the diagnosis of acquired hemophilia A (AHA) by reviewing the margin between the cost to the hospital for providing care and the amount the hospital is reimbursed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) in the US., Methods: Data source was the Medicare Limited Data Set, which contains claims for hospitalizations, charges, and amounts reimbursed by CMS. Study patients were hospitalized with AHA and treated with rpFVIII and/or rFVIIa between 1/1/2015 and 12/31/2019. CMS Fiscal Year 2020 Impact Files, with hospital-level cost-to-charge ratios (CCRs), were used to estimate hospital costs. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to estimate margins at different CCRs., Results: Hospital margins were, on average, positive with use of either rpFVIII or rFVIIa (rpFVIII: $51,548.89; rFVIIa: $35,943.80). Sensitivity analysis results suggest that the use of rpFVIII is similiar, compared with rFVIIa for a large majority of hospitals., Conclusions: While there may be higher reimbursement for rpFVIII hospitalizations, this analysis suggests that the use of rpFVIII, compared to rFVIIa, may have no impact on hospital finances for the majority of hospitals, despite rpFVIII's higher per unit cost.

Recent regional and insurance database studies indicate that diagnoses of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are rare, with fewer than 200,000 affected patients in the United States. These findings are at odds with the generally accepted prevalence of approximately 1%. To estimate the number of patients diagnosed with HS, including patients enrolled in public health plans and the uninsured, we performed an investigation using National Center for Health Statistics databases of visits to health care providers. Survey data from physician offices and clinics, hospital outpatient departments, and emergency departments in the United States were analyzed. There were 254,000 (95% confidence interval: 180,000, 328,000) health care visits by patients with HS per year from 2002 to 2010. An annualized estimate of 118,000 (95% confidence interval: 83,000, 152,000) patients with HS diagnoses was determined. Excluding emergency department data, the annualized estimate was 100,000 (95% confidence interval: 67,000, 134,000) patients. Adults between 18 and 64 years of age comprised 92.8% (standard error, 2.6%) of HS patients. Of that working-age population, 31.5% (standard error, 5.6%) were enrolled in Medicare or Medicaid, which is a significantly higher proportion than for those in the same age group in the general population. A review of earlier surveys of HS prevalence was performed. HS is a rarely diagnosed disease, and epidemiologic data to support undiagnosed HS as a common disease are lacking. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

As the temporal, financial, and ethical cost of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) continues to rise, researchers and regulators in drug discovery and development face increasing pressure to make better use of existing data sources. This pressure is especially high in rare disease, where traditionally designed RCTs are often infeasible due to the inability to recruit enough patients or the unwillingness of patients or trial leaders to randomly assign anyone to placebo. Bayesian statistical methods have recently been recommended in such settings for their ability to combine disparate data sources, increasing overall study power. The use of these methods has received a boost in the United States thanks to a new willingness by regulators at the Food and Drug Administration to consider complex innovative trial designs. These designs allow trialists to change the nature of the trial (eg, stop early for success or futility, drop an underperforming trial arm, incorporate data on historical controls, etc) while it is still running. In this article, we review a broad collection of Bayesian techniques useful in rare disease research, indicating the benefits and risks associated with each. We begin with relatively innocuous methods for combining information from RCTs and proceed on through increasingly innovative approaches that borrow strength from increasingly heterogeneous and less carefully curated data sources. We also offer 2 examples from the very recent literature illustrating how clinical pharmacology principles can make important contributions to such designs, confirming the interdisciplinary nature of this work., (© 2022, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Putting aside whether diseases that affect only small numbers of people (“rare diseases”) should be prioritized over diseases that are otherwise orphaned, in this article I argue that a new approach to rare, orphan diseases is needed. The current model, first signaled by the United States'Orphan Drug Actand subsequently emulated by several other jurisdictions, relies on a set of open-ended criteria and market-based incentives in order to define and encourage drug therapies for rare, orphan diseases. Given a) the biopharmaceutical industries' growing interest in orphan diseases, b) progress in the sphere of personalized medicines enabling more and more common diseases to be reclassified as rare, and c) empirical evidence suggesting that the most orphan drugs target only a limited, lucrative subset of rare diseases, I argue that Canada, which recently announced plans to develop its own “orphan drug framework” should not follow the United States' orphan drug model. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Scientific advancements, new US FDA approval pathways and limited competition have contributed to rapid growth in the number of approved rare disease treatments in recent years. While the rising numbers of orphan drug approvals are a sign of success, the rapid growth in approved rare disease treatments has created concerns about the pricing of orphan drugs and their cumulative affordability to the health system. To support efforts to build a policy and practice infrastructure that drives innovation within a platform that is affordable to patients and the health system, this paper provides an analysis of potential risks as well as advantages of reform options related to drug development, pricing and coverage.

Facing substantial obstacles to developing new therapies for rare diseases, some sponsors are looking to ‘repurpose’ drugs already approved for other conditions and use those therapies to treat rare diseases. In an effort to facilitate such repurposing and speed the delivery of new therapies to people who need them, we have established a new resource, the Rare Disease Repurposing Database (RDRD). The advantages of repurposed compounds include their demonstrated efficacy (in some clinical contexts), their observed toxicity profiles and their clearly described manufacturing controls. To create the RDRD, we matched the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) orphan designation database to FDA drug and biological product approval lists. The RDRD lists 236 products that have received orphan status designation—that is, were found to be ‘promising’ for the treatment of a rare disease—and though not yet approved for marketing for that rare disease, they are already approved for marketing to treat some other disease or condition. The RDRD contains three tables: Orphan-designated products with at least one marketing approval for a common disease indication (N = 109); orphan-designated products with at least one marketing approval for a rare disease indication (N = 76); and orphan-designated products with marketing approvals for both common and rare disease indications (N = 51). While the data included in the database is a re-configuration/cross-indexing of information already released by the FDA, it offers sponsors a new tool for finding special opportunities to develop niche therapies for rare disease patients. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Patient registries are important for understanding the causes and origins of rare diseases and estimating their impact; and they may prove critical to the development of new diagnostics and therapeutics. This paper introduces the [RD] PRISM resource (http://rdprism.org), a project funded by the National Institutes of Health to develop a library of standardized question-and-answer sets to support rare disease research. The paper presents a project case-driven plan for creating a new registry using questions from an existing related registry, revising and expanding an existing registry, and showing interoperability of data collected from different registries and data sources. Each of the use cases involves the retrieval of indexed questions for reuse. Successful retrieval of questions can facilitate their reuse in registries, meaning new registries can be implemented more quickly, and the use of 'standard' questions can be facilitated. The paper further discusses issues involved in encoding the sets with relevant data standards for interoperability and indexing encoded sets with metadata for optimal retrievability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Large gaps exist in understanding the symptomatic and functional impact of sarcoidosis, a rare multisystem granulomatous disease affecting fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States. Smartphones could be used for prospective research, especially for rare diseases where organizing large cohorts can be challenging, given their near ubiquitous ownership and ability to track objective and subjective data with increasingly sophisticated technology., Objective: We aimed to investigate whether smartphones could assess the quality of life (QoL) and physical activity of a large cohort of individuals with sarcoidosis., Methods: We developed a mobile app (Sarcoidosis App) for a prospective, cross-sectional study on individuals with sarcoidosis. The Sarcoidosis App was made available on both Apple and Android smartphones. Individuals with sarcoidosis were recruited, consented, and enrolled entirely within the app. Surveys on sarcoidosis history, medical history, and medications were administered. Patients completed modules from the Sarcoidosis Assessment Tool, a validated patient-reported outcomes assessment of physical activity, fatigue, pain, skin symptoms, sleep, and lungs symptoms. Physical activity measured by smartphones was tracked as available., Results: From April 2018 to May 2020, the App was downloaded 2558 times, and 629 individuals enrolled (404, 64.2% female; mean age 51 years; 513, 81.6% White; 86, 13.7% Black). Two-thirds of participants had a college or graduate degree, and more than half of them reported an income greater than US $60,000. Both QoL related to physical activity (P<.001, ρ=0.250) and fatigue (P<.01, ρ=-0.203) correlated with actual smartphone-tracked physical activity. Overall, 19.0% (98/517) of participants missed at least 1 week of school or work in an observed month owing to sarcoidosis, and 44.4% (279/629) reported that finances "greatly" or "severely" affected by sarcoidosis. Furthermore, 71.2% (437/614) of participants reported taking medications for sarcoidosis, with the most common being prednisone, methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, and infliximab. Moreover, 46.4% (244/526) reported medication side effects, most commonly due to prednisone., Conclusions: We demonstrate that smartphones can prospectively recruit, consent, and study physical activity, QoL, and medication usage in a large sarcoidosis cohort, using both passively collected objective data and qualitative surveys that did not require any in-person encounters. Our study's limitations include the study population being weighted toward more educated and wealthier individuals, suggesting that recruitment was not representative of the full spectrum of patients with sarcoidosis in the United States. Our study provides a model for future smartphone-enabled clinical research for rare diseases and highlights key technical challenges that future research teams interested in smartphone-based research for rare diseases should anticipate., (©Brian Chu, Daniel M O'Connor, Marilyn Wan, Ian Barnett, Haochang Shou, Marc Judson, Misha Rosenbach. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 10.08.2022.)

Background: Amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is an ultra-rare disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Few studies have examined the global epidemiology of this condition., Methods: This study estimated the diagnosed incidence and 1-year, 5-year, 10-year, and 20-year period prevalence of AL amyloidosis in 2018 for countries in and near Europe, and in the United States (US), Canada, Brazil, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Russia. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to identify country-specific, age- and gender-specific diagnosed incidence of AL amyloidosis and observed survival data-point inputs for an incidence-to-prevalence model. Extrapolations were used to estimate incidence and prevalence for countries without registry or published epidemiological data., Results: Of 171 publications identified in the SLR, 10 records met the criteria for data extraction, and two records were included in the final incidence-to-prevalence model. In 2018, an estimated 74,000 AL amyloidosis cases worldwide were diagnosed during the preceding 20 years. The estimated incidence and 20-year prevalence rates were 10 and 51 cases per million population, respectively., Conclusions: Orphan medicinal product designation criteria of the European Medicines Agency or Electronic Code of Federal Regulations indicate that a disease must not affect > 5 in 10,000 people across the European Union or affect < 200,000 people in the US. This study provides up-to-date epidemiological patterns of AL amyloidosis, which is vital for understanding the burden of the disease, increasing awareness, and to further research and treatment options., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: The small patient populations inherent to rare genetic diseases present many challenges to the traditional drug development paradigm. One major challenge is generating sufficient data in early phase studies to inform dose selection for later phase studies and dose optimization for clinical use of the drug. However, optimizing the benefit-risk profile of drugs through appropriate dose selection during drug development is critical for all drugs, including those being developed to treat rare diseases. Recognizing the challenges of conducting dose finding studies in rare disease populations and the importance of dose selection and optimization for successful drug development, we assessed the dose-finding studies and analyses conducted for drugs recently approved for rare genetic diseases., Results: Of the 40 marketing applications for new molecular entity (NME) drugs and biologics approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for rare genetic diseases from 2015 to 2020, 21 (53%) of the development programs conducted at least one dedicated dose-finding study. In addition, the majority of drug development programs conducted clinical studies in healthy subjects and included population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analyses; some programs also conducted clinical studies in patient populations other than the disease for which the drug was initially approved. The majority of primary endpoints utilized in dedicated dose-finding studies were biomarkers, and the primary endpoint of the safety and efficacy study matched the primary endpoint used in the dose finding study in 9 of 13 (69%) drug development programs where primary study endpoints were assessed., Conclusions: Our study showed that NME drug development programs for rare genetic diseases utilize multiple data sources for dosing information, including studies in healthy subjects, population pharmacokinetic analyses, and exposure-response analyses. In addition, our results indicate that biomarkers play a key role in dose-finding studies for rare genetic disease drug development programs. Our findings highlight the need to develop study designs and methods to allow adequate dose-finding efforts within rare disease drug development programs that help overcome the challenges presented by low patient prevalence and other factors. Furthermore, the frequent reliance on biomarkers as endpoints for dose-finding studies underscores the importance of biomarker development in rare diseases., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Arginase 1 Deficiency (ARG1-D) is an inherited metabolic disease that leads to significant morbidity., Aims: Despite the recognized burden of disease, information on health care resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with ARG1-D is lacking. We, therefore, sought to evaluate HCRU in ARG1-D relative to non-ARG1-D cohort., Materials and Methods: Patients with ≥2 ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for ARG1-D were identified (first diagnosis code = index date) using professional fee claims linked with prescription claims. Patients with ARG1-D were matched 1:1 to a comparator cohort of patients with other medical conditions. Matching variables included age, sex, index year, payer type (Medicare, Medicaid, third party) and geographic region., Results: A total of 77 patients met the inclusion criteria for the ARG1-D cohort, with a median age of 15 years, 52% <18 years, and 52% male. Several concurrent diagnoses were recorded at a higher frequency in the ARG1-D cohort versus the matched comparator (spasticity 7 times higher; developmental delay ∼2 times higher; intellectual disability 5 times higher; and seizures 8 times higher). Emergency room visits occurred twice as often, laboratory tests were performed 1.5 times more often, hospitalization was required 3 times more often, and mean length of stay was longer for patients with ARG1-D than the comparator cohort (2.4 days vs. 0.3 days)., Limitations: A relatively short study period while the burden of ARG1-D increases over a lifetime due to disease progression., Conclusions: Patients with ARG1-D had significantly greater HCRU compared with those without the disease; they presented with a more extensive comorbidity profile, accessed the health care system more frequently, required more intense monitoring and management, and had more frequent and longer hospitalizations relative to the comparator group. These findings demonstrate a high health burden in ARG1-D that is not mitigated by standard-of-care measures and emphasize the need for improved treatment options.

Many novel therapies are now available for rare neuromuscular conditions that were previously untreatable. Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis and spinal muscular atrophy are two examples of diseases with new medications that have transformed our field. The United States and the United Kingdom have taken disparate approaches to the approval and coverage of medications, despite both providing incentives to develop therapies targeting rare diseases. The US requires less evidence for approval when compared with medications for common diseases and does not have a mechanism to ensure or even encourage cost-effectiveness. The Institute of Clinical and Economic Review provides in-depth cost-effectiveness analyses in the US, but does not have the authority to negotiate drug costs. In contrast, the UK has maintained a similar scientific threshold for approval of all therapies, while requiring negotiation with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence to ensure that medications are cost-effective for rare diseases. These differences have led to approval of medications for rare diseases in the US that have less evidence than required for common diseases. Importantly, these medications have not been approved in the UK. Even when medications meet traditional scientific thresholds, they uniformly arrive with high list prices in the US, whereas they are available at cost-effective prices in the UK. The main downsides to the UK approach are that cost-effective medications are often available months later than in the US, and some medications remain unavailable., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal inherited disease characterized by a significant increase in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), tendon xanthoma and premature coronary artery disease (PCAD). In this paper, we analyze the current research status of FH, summarize the reported mutation gene loci in Chinese FH patients and treatment for them, and elaborate the current status of patents and drug researches. The results show that scientific outcomes of FH are increasing with a good developmental trend and the most popular topics of FH study are pathogenesis, treatment of FH, and research on juvenile FH patients. In terms of patents, large pharmaceutical companies, such as Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, AstraZeneca Plc, Merck & Co Inc, are actively engaged in FH detection, diagnosis and treatment. In addition, 12 drugs have been launched in the United States, Japan, Europe and other countries or regions, bringing hope to FH patients.

The regulatory standards of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) require substantial evidence of effectiveness from adequate and well-controlled trials that typically use a valid comparison to an internal concurrent control. However, when it is not feasible or ethical to use an internal control, particularly in rare disease populations, relying on external controls may be acceptable. To better understand the use of external controls to support product development and approval, we reviewed FDA regulatory approval decisions between 2000 and 2019 for drug and biologic products to identify pivotal studies that leveraged external controls, with a focus on select therapeutic areas. Forty-five approvals were identified where FDA accepted external control data in their benefit/risk assessment; they did so for many reasons including the rare nature of the disease, ethical concerns regarding use of a placebo or no-treatment arm, the seriousness of the condition, and the high unmet medical need. Retrospective natural history data, including retrospective reviews of patient records, was the most common source of external control (44%). Other types of external control were baseline control (33%); published data (11%); and data from a previous clinical study (11%). To gain further insights, a comprehensive evaluation of selected approvals utilizing different types of external control is provided to highlight the variety of approaches used by sponsors and the challenges encountered in supporting product development and FDA decision making; particularly, the value and use of retrospective natural history in the development of products for rare diseases. Education on the use of external controls based on FDA regulatory precedent will allow for continued use and broader application of innovative approaches to clinical trial design, while avoiding delays in product development for rare diseases. Learnings from this review also highlight the need to update regulatory guidance to acknowledge the utility of external controls, particularly retrospective natural history data., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

It is estimated that there are over ten million rare disease patients in China currently. Due to a lack of effective drugs and reimbursement regulations for medical expenses the diseases bring most patients enormous physical suffering and psychological despair. Past experience in other countries such as the United States, Japan, and the European Union have shown that legislation is the critical step to improve the miserable situation of rare disease patients. Laws and regulations for rare diseases in these countries prescribe a series of incentives for research and development of orphan drugs which turn out to obviously allow these drugs to flourish. Legislation has also established a drug reimbursement system to reduce the medical burden of the patients. These measures effectively protect the rights and interests of patients with rare diseases. In China, legislation for rare diseases has begun to attract the attention of authorities. It is anticipated that relevant laws and regulations will be established as early as possible to provide safeguards for rare disease patients in China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]