Search

Your search keyword '"UNITED States district courts"' showing total 8 results
Start Over Descriptor "UNITED States district courts" Region utah
8 results on '"UNITED States district courts"'

1. Appellate Highlights.

Author

Parker, Rodney R.

Subjects
*CIRCUIT courts, *COMPENSATION (Law), *NEGLIGENCE lawsuits, *THEFT lawsuits, *ACTIONS & defenses (Law), UNITED States district courts
Abstract

The article discusses the decisions of the several court cases in the Utah. Topics discussed include decision of the United States Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in case Ortiz v. United States ex ret. Evans Army Cmty. Hosp. related to compensation for injuries, decision of the district court in case Barneck v. Utah Dep't of Transp. related to negligence and wrongful death and decision of the Utah Court of Appeals in case State v. Ludlow related to theft.

Published
2015

2. ZERO DOWN SUPPLY CHAIN SOLU-TIONS, INC.; Zero Down Supply Chain Solutions, LLC; ZeroDownConsult-ing.com, Inc.; and Brad McBride, Plain-tiffs, v. GLOBAL TRANSPORTATION SOLU-TIONS, INC.; RFQ World, Inc.; RKC Development, L.C.; Key Bank of Utah; Global...

Subjects
DEFENDANTS, UNITED States. Racketeer Influenced & Corrupt Organizations Act, COURT orders, UNITED States district courts, DEFAULT (Law), JURY trials
Abstract

The article discusses the court case Zero Down Supply Chain v. Global Transp. Solution, wherein the plaintiffs filed a case against the defendants under the U.S. Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). The U.S. District Court, Utah ordered that due to entry of default the defendant does not have constitutional right to jury trial. The Court further ordered that in spite of default entry the defendants had the right to jury for assessing damages.

Published
2012

3. BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY, a Utah Non-Profit Education Institution; and Dr. Daniel L. Simmons, an individu-al, Plaintiffs, v. PFIZER, INC., a Delaware corporation; G.D. Searle & Company, a Delaware cor-poration; G.D. Searle LLC, a Delaware limited...

Subjects
PATENT suits, LEGAL motions, UNITED States district courts, UNIVERSITIES & colleges, ACTIONS & defenses (Law)
Abstract

The article discusses the court case Brigham Young University v. Pfizer Inc., wherein the plaintiffs filed an action against the defendants seeking correction of inventorship concerning certain patents. The plaintiffs moved a motion for discovery sanctions. The U.S. District Court, Utah denied the motion of the plaintiffs because of the Court's discretion in resolvingdiscovery disputes.

Published
2012

4. UNIFIED CONTAINER, LLC, and Anderson Dairy, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. MAZUMA CAPITAL CORP., and Republic Bank, Inc., Defendant.

Subjects
ACTIONS & defenses (Law), UNITED States district courts, DEFENDANTS, CONSPIRACY laws, MOTIONS to dismiss, LEGAL sanctions, FRAUD
Abstract

The article discusses the U.S. District Court case Unified Container, LLC v. Mazuma Capital Corp., for the District of Utah, wherein state-court action against Mazuma Capital Corp. and its assignee, defendants, was brought by plaintiffs for breach of equipment lease agreements and civil conspiracy. The defendants filed motion to dismiss plaintiffs' fraud-based civil conspiracy claim and for Federal Rule 11 sanctions. It provides information that the defendants' motions were denied.

Published
2012

5. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT LAYTON, UTAH 84040, et al., Defendants.

Subjects
ACTIONS & defenses (Law), FORFEITURE, UNITED States district courts, DEPOSITIONS, FEDERAL government of the United States
Abstract

The article discusses a court case of the U.S. v. Real Property Located at Layton, Utah based on a civil forfeiture action by the U.S. government against monetary assets. It mentions claimant's motions for protective orders that prohibit government form deposition. It informs that the U.S. district court ordered for special circumstances in which the claimant in Nevada can be holding deposition in the district of Utah.

Published
2011

6. Ghostbusting Experts.

Author

Call, Keith A.

Subjects
*GHOSTWRITING, *EXPERT evidence, *LAWYERS, *PATENT infringement, *ACTIONS & defenses (Law), UNITED States district courts
Abstract

The article discusses the practice of ghostwriting in formation of expert report by the lawyers which is unethical. Topics discussed include comment of Federal District Court in Michigan about unethical writing in case Numatics, Inc. v. Balluff, Inc related to patent dispute, differences between Federal and Utah State rules on expert reports and Identification between permissible assistance and improper participation in case of expert report formation.

Published
2015

7. After Court Ruling, Same-Sex Marriage Comes (Briefly) To Utah.

Subjects
*SAME-sex marriage, *ILLEGALITY, UNITED States district courts
Abstract

The article discusses the ruling of the U.S. District Court Judge Robert Shelby for a court case Herbert v. Kitchen which bans gay marriage in Utah. The case highlights the criticisms of Gary Herbert, Governor of Utah, regarding the decision of Shelby. The case also informs about the illegality of same-sex marriage in the country.

Published
2014

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results