Search

Background: This study evaluates relationships among race, access to endoscopy services, and colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality in Washington state (WA)., Methods: We overlayed the locations of ambulatory endoscopy services with place of residence at time of death, using Department of Health data (2011-2018). We compared CRC mortality data within and outside a 10 ​km buffer from services. We used linear regression to assess the impact of distance and race on age at death while adjusting for gender and education level., Results: Age at death: median 72.9y vs. 68.2y for white vs. non-white (p ​< ​0.001). The adjusted model showed that non-whites residing outside the buffer died 6.9y younger on average (p ​< ​0.001). Non-whites residing inside the buffer died 5.2y younger on average (p ​< ​0.001), and whites residing outside the buffer died 1.6y younger (p ​< ​0.001). We used heatmaps to geolocate death density., Conclusions: Results suggest that geographic access to endoscopy services disproportionately impacts non-whites in Washington. These data help identify communities which may benefit from improved access to alternative colorectal cancer screening methods., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Rural surgeons operate in an environment significantly different from that of their colleagues, and as such they face unique challenges. We hypothesized the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) research agenda (as identified in the results of the 2014 Delphi study) will differ in its priorities from those identified by rural surgeons. We aimed to pilot a study in Washington state that could be replicated in other areas of the USA and the world., Methods: We identified general surgeons working at rural critical access hospitals in the state of Washington. We then conducted virtual, semi-structured interviews and followed up with surveys and site visits. The survey included the 2014 SAGES Delphi-ranked research priorities. We asked rural surgeons to rank their top 5 of these 40 priorities and to detail any additional which were not on the list., Results: We contacted 79 surgeons with a 30% response rate. We conducted 25 semi-structured interviews and received 18 completed follow-up surveys. These interviews were followed by site visits at 4 of the 23 sites. Of the original Delphi research priorities, those most cited by rural surgeons were #8 ("What is the best method for incorporating new techniques and technology for surgeons of variable levels of experience or training?") and #1 ("How do we best train, assess, and maintain proficiency of surgeons and surgical trainees in flexible endoscopy, laparoscopy, and open surgery?"). Four surgeons included the last SAGES priority (#40 "Is quality of life improved after ventral hernia repair?") among their top 5., Conclusion: This study suggests that although rural surgeons' research priorities align with the published SAGES Delphi survey, these surgeons rank the priorities differently. This may be because the predominant study population of the Delphi is SAGES membership who work in urban and academic centers. Plans for future SAGES Delphi survey could capture these unique priorities by intentional involvement of rural and community surgeons., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

When COVID-19 curtailed elective surgeries, our college transitioned to a virtual platform. "Benched" surgeons statewide engaged students online. Third-year students who had completed 2/3 of a longitudinal integrated clerkship (LIC) studied online modules on topics germane to surgery for 1 week. Core entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for entering residency were the backbone of lessons/assignments/assessments. Surgeons coached students around EPAs. Fifty-eight students in consistent small groups, spent 2 hours/day for 4 days with the same pair of surgeon coaches. Off-line, students created a unique hypothetical case/day, practiced and peer-reviewed EPAs. Online, coaches posed scenarios to drill EPAs. Pre/during/post assessments demonstrated progressive proficiency. High level of engagement resulted in 100% attendance and ease of recruitment/retention of faculty. Although variability in students' clinical settings was high, a virtual week had aided in leveling the learning environment. Prior experience with 2/3 of their total surgery exposure in the LIC allowed for a smooth transition to virtual.