Search

Background In the USA, one in five adults live with a mental illness, and researchers have estimated that nearly half of the population will have a mental illness over the course of their lifetime. Research has shown significant associations between social relationships and mental health outcomes at the individual and population levels. This study aims to examine whether sense of community, a type of social capital, is associated with mental health. Methods In a cross-sectional analysis, multiple logistic regression models were used to examine whether sense of community was associated with symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress reported over the last week. The analysis used data from the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin collected between 2014 and 2016. A total of 1647 observations are included in the analyses. Results Compared with those who report a positive sense of community, those with a negative sense of community had a significantly higher odds of reporting depression, anxiety and stress symptoms. Socioeconomic status is negatively associated with depression and anxiety, but not with stress. Women were more likely to experience moderate, severe, or extremely severe anxiety and stress, compared with men. Conclusion This study extends current understanding of health benefits of social capital and found that individuals' sense of community is associated with reduced symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress. Further research examining mechanisms to support improved sense of community and other types of social capital could benefit health equity research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To examine the impact of a Wisconsin health care reform enacted in early 2008 on public insurance enrollment and retention. Administrative data covering the period January 2007 to November 2009. We calculate unadjusted enrollment trends and exit rates stratified by age, income group, and enrollment mode. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models are estimated to assess the impact of the reform on program exits. Overall enrollment increased by approximately one-third and exit rates decreased by approximately one-fifth. The majority of new enrollment came from the previously income eligible. Wisconsin's enactment of eligibility expansions coupled with administrative simplification and targeted marketing and outreach efforts were successful in enrolling and retaining low-income children and families in public coverage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine Wisconsin physicians' opinions regarding health care reform., Methods: The University of Wisconsin Survey Research Center performed a 46-question mail survey of 2500 randomly selected physicians from the Wisconsin Medical Society master list of practicing physicians. Respondents rated opinions on a 5-point Likert scale. Demographics of respondents (sex practice type, geographic location, age) were compared to non-responders and the overall Wisconsin physician population. Data analysis quantified opinions regarding the health care system in Wisconsin and nationally, elements of health care reform proposals, and the role of public policy and government in health care. The analysis emphasized a comparison of primary care versus specialist physician responses., Results: The survey yielded a 38% response rate. Respondent demographics were representative of Wisconsin physicians and very similar to nonresponders. Respondents revealed support for several topics, regardless of the respondent's practice type. Respondents also were in agreement on which elements of reform were most frequently favored and most frequently opposed. Nevertheless, there were many areas where primary care physicians strongly differed from specialists, such as favoring legislation for national health insurance (65.6% primary care versus 46.2% specialist)., Conclusions: Wisconsin physicians responding to this survey expressed dissatisfaction with the health care system in which they currently practice and noted a clear desire for system reform. While most respondents agree on a few key priorities, primary care physicians significantly differ in their preferred strategies for reform and, in particular, the role of government in a reformed system. These results indicate a need for more dialogue and education among physicians in order to achieve a consensus that might help promote reform.