Search

• Countries pursuing 'zero COVID' rely on strong restrictions or even city lockdown. • Optimally balancing restrictions's length and confidence that the outbreak is ending is important. • The proportion of cases who miss the intervention restrictions and thus are capable of causing secondary transmission is estimated. • An iterative method is designed to quantify the daily end-of-outbreak confidence since the last reported case. • The projection of the end-of-outbreak day relies on the size of reproduction number and the acceptable risk threshold assuming the invariant distribution of serial interval. The end-of-outbreak declaration is an important part of epidemic control, marking the relaxation or cancellation of prevention and control measures. We propose a probability model to retrospectively quantify the confidence of giving the end-of-outbreak declaration during the COVID-19 epidemic in early 2020 in Wuhan. By using the linear spline, we firstly estimates the time-varying proportion of cases who miss the nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) among all reported cases. Assuming the reproduction numbers being 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0, the respective probability of the end of the COVID-19 outbreak with time after the last reported case can be iteratively computed. Consequently, the varying reproduction numbers produce slightly different increasing patterns of NPI effectiveness, and the end-of-outbreak declarations with 95% confidence are projected consistently earlier than the day when the lockdown was actually lifted. The reason for the timing discrepancy is discussed as well. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Effective reproductive numbers (R t) for COVID-19 are linked to dates of interventions. • From 3.98 before lockdown, R t declined to below 1 by the second week of February 2020. • Declines follow "early detection, early report, early quarantine and early treatment". • Evaluations of interventions provide lessons for others. Effective reproductive numbers (R t) were calculated from data on the COVID-19 outbreak in China and linked to dates in 2020 when different interventions were enacted. From a maximum of 3.98 before the lockdown in Wuhan City, the values of R t declined to below 1 by the second week of February, after the construction of hospitals dedicated to COVID-19 patients. The R t continued to decline following additional measures in line with the policy of "early detection, early report, early quarantine, and early treatment." The results provide quantitative evaluations of how intervention measures and their timings succeeded, from which lessons can be learned by other countries dealing with future outbreaks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since the emergence of the first cases in Wuhan, China, the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infection has been quickly spreading out to other provinces and neighboring countries. Estimation of the basic reproduction number by means of mathematical modeling can be helpful for determining the potential and severity of an outbreak and providing critical information for identifying the type of disease interventions and intensity. A deterministic compartmental model was devised based on the clinical progression of the disease, epidemiological status of the individuals, and intervention measures. The estimations based on likelihood and model analysis show that the control reproduction number may be as high as 6.47 (95% CI 5.71–7.23). Sensitivity analyses show that interventions, such as intensive contact tracing followed by quarantine and isolation, can effectively reduce the control reproduction number and transmission risk, with the effect of travel restriction adopted by Wuhan on 2019-nCoV infection in Beijing being almost equivalent to increasing quarantine by a 100 thousand baseline value. It is essential to assess how the expensive, resource-intensive measures implemented by the Chinese authorities can contribute to the prevention and control of the 2019-nCoV infection, and how long they should be maintained. Under the most restrictive measures, the outbreak is expected to peak within two weeks (since 23 January 2020) with a significant low peak value. With travel restriction (no imported exposed individuals to Beijing), the number of infected individuals in seven days will decrease by 91.14% in Beijing, compared with the scenario of no travel restriction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]