Search

Building ecological networks can effectively enhance the quality and stability of ecosystems and better conserve biodiversity. Previous studies mainly determined ecological corridors based on selecting ecological sources at a regional scale (e.g., an administrative area), without considering the bioclimatic heterogeneity within the study area. Here, we propose a novel integrating approach involving bioclimatic zoning and selecting ecological sources from various bioclimatic zones to design ecological corridors. Taking Xi'an City, China, as an example, key bioclimatic variables were first chosen, and we partitioned the study area based on its bioclimatic characteristics through a combination of K-means clustering and variance inflation factor (VIF). Ecological sources were then identified from the combination of ecosystem services and habitats of 36 endangered species. Subsequently, the minimum cumulative resistance (MCR) model was used to build ecological networks within different bioclimatic zones and across the entire region. We found the following: (1) In Xi'an city, a total of 49 source areas and 117 corridors were identified. The identified network can protect 97.77% of species, facilitating connectivity between 30.50% of ecosystems and 35.5% of species-rich areas. (2) The integrating approach protects 12.26% more species richness and 10.95% more ecosystem services than the average value of the regional and bioregional approaches. Compared to regional and bioregional methods, integrating approaches demonstrate greater advantages in preserving species richness and ecosystem services. This study introduces a novel approach to constructing regional ecological networks, which integrates the impact of bioclimatic zoning into the process of network construction to improve ecosystem services and protect species habitats. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To improve urban seismic resilience, a reasonable seismic retrofitting scheme for buildings is required. Urban cities contain a large number of buildings, making it challenging to precisely assess the seismic retrofitting benefits of each one. This paper proposes a cost–benefit assessment framework that takes into account seismic risk, seismic damage, retrofit costs, economic losses, and cost–benefit analyses for the city-scale seismic retrofitting of buildings. The proposed framework adopts readily available building parameters, including the number of stories, construction year, total height, structural type, floor area, and response spectrum for structural design. It makes use of empirical seismic retrofitting models and a newly developed story-level seismic loss assessment method combining the physical mechanism and empirical loss ratios. For city-scale cost–benefit analysis, the framework can strike a good balance between data accessibility, computational workload, level of result details, and result accuracy. It can adapt nimbly to earthquake-induced indirect losses and budgetary constraints on retrofitting. The analysis of 98,618 buildings in Xi'an city, China, is carried out. The findings indicate that, when potential indirect economic loss ratios of buildings are neglected, the retrofitting benefits of unreinforced masonry and old buildings are the most significant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]