Search

We report the case of a 26 year old patient with a primary, Ann Arbor stage IE, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the uterine corpus. The patient was admitted to our hospital because of a one year history of vaginal contact bleeding. Final diagnosis was based on the histological and immunohistochemical evaluation of a specimen obtained by fractionated cervical and uterine curettage. Further staging has not revealed any other localization of the disease. Antilymphoma treatment was started with CHOP combined with rituximab and resulted complete remission. This is the first reported case of an uterine lymphoma treated by rituximab-based immunochemotherapy.

AbstractThe cytogenetic responses during the first chronic phase of 11 patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) treated with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) + interferon (IFN) were compared with those of 9 other CML patients treated with IFN alone. Metaphase and interphase cytogenetics and a semi-quantitative polymerase chain reaction were used to evaluate the cytogenetic responses. Two of the 11 patients in the ATRA + IFN group were withdrawn, one of them because of IFN intolerance, and the other because of non-compliance. Of the 9 remaining ATRA + IFN-treated patients 6 exhibited major cytogenetic responses, 3 of which were complete. Of the 9 patients treated with IFN alone, only 2 showed major cytogenetic responses. No severe adverse effects were observed. The preliminary results suggest that the ATRA + IFN combination may be superior in achieving cytogenetic remission in the first chronic phase of CML.Copyright © 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hydroxyurea (HU) is a commonly used first-line treatment in patients with polycythemia vera (PV). However, approximately 15%-24% of PV patients report intolerance and resistance to HU., Methods: This phase IV, European, real-world, observational study assessed the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in PV patients who were resistant and/or intolerant to HU, with a 24-month follow-up. The primary objective was to describe the profile and disease burden of PV patients., Results: In the 350 enrolled patients, 70% were >60 years old. Most patients (59.4%) had received ≥1 phlebotomy in the 12 months prior to the first dose of ruxolitinib. Overall, 68.2% of patients achieved hematocrit control with 92.3% patients having hematocrit <45% and 35.4% achieved hematologic remission at month 24. 85.1% of patients had no phlebotomies during the study. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 54.3% of patients and the most common event was anemia (22.6%). Of the 10 reported deaths, two were suspected to be study drug-related., Conclusion: This study demonstrates that ruxolitinib treatment in PV maintains durable hematocrit control with a decrease in the number of phlebotomies in the majority of patients and was generally well tolerated., (© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) is a pathological feature of myelofibrosis, with higher grades associated with poor prognosis. Limited data exist on the association between outcomes and BMF changes. We present BMF data from Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor-naive patients from SIMPLIFY-1 (NCT01969838), a double-blind, randomized, phase 3 study of momelotinib vs ruxolitinib. Baseline and week 24 bone marrow biopsies were graded from 0 to 3 as per World Health Organization criteria. Other assessments included Total Symptom Score, spleen volume, transfusion independence status, and hemoglobin levels. Paired samples were available from 144 and 160 patients randomized to momelotinib and ruxolitinib. With momelotinib and ruxolitinib, transfusion independence was achieved by 87% and 44% of patients with BMF improvement of ≥1 grade and 76% and 56% of those with stable/worsening BMF; there was no association between BMF changes and transfusion independence for either arm (momelotinib, p  = .350; ruxolitinib, p  = .096). Regardless of BMF changes, hemoglobin levels also generally increased on momelotinib but decreased on ruxolitinib. In addition, no associations between BMF changes and spleen (momelotinib, p  = .126; ruxolitinib, p  = .407)/symptom (momelotinib, p  = .617; ruxolitinib, p  = .833) outcomes were noted, and no improvement in overall survival was observed with ≥1-grade BMF improvement (momelotinib, p  = .395; ruxolitinib, p  = .407). These data suggest that the anemia benefit of momelotinib is not linked to BMF changes, and question the use of BMF assessment as a surrogate marker for clinical benefit with JAK inhibitors., Competing Interests: Stephen T. Oh reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, CTI BioPharma, Disc Medicine, Incyte, Kartos Therapeutics, PharmaEssentia, and Sierra Oncology. Srdan Verstovsek reports consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Incyte, Novartis, and Sierra Oncology and research funding from AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, CTI BioPharma, Genentech, Gilead, Incyte, Italfarmaco, Novartis, NS Pharma, PharmaEssentia, and Promedior. Vikas Gupta reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Constellation Biopharma, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sierra Oncology; honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Constellation Biopharma, and Novartis; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Pfizer, and Roche. Uwe Platzbecker reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Janssen, and Novartis; honoraria from Amgen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Takeda; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisor board for AbbVie and Novartis. Timothy Devos reports consulting fees from AOP Health, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Incyte, and MorphoSys and honoraria from Novartis and Sobi. Jean‐Jacques Kiladjian reports honoraria from Novartis and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, AOP Orphan, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, and Novartis. Donal P. McLornan reports grants or contracts from CPI and honoraria from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis. Andrew Perkins reports honoraria from AbbVie, Novartis, CTI BioPharma, Sierra Oncology, and Kartos Therapeutics. Maria Laura Fox reports consulting fees from AbbVie, GSK, Novartis, and Sierra Oncology; payment or honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis; and travel support from AbbVie. Mary Frances McMullin reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, CTI, Novartis, and Sierra Oncology and honoraria from AbbVie, AOP, Incyte, Novartis, and Pfizer. Adam J. Mead reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Galecto, Gilead, Incyte, Karyopharm, Novartis, Pfizer, Sensyn, and Sierra Oncology; travel fees from Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene. Jiri Mayer reports research support from Sierra Oncology. Tomasz Sacha reports honoraria from Angelini Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. Jun Kawashima reports employment at Sierra Oncology and stock or stock options at Gilead Sciences and Sierra Oncology. Mei Huang reports employment and stock options at Sierra Oncology. Bryan Strouse reports employment at Sierra Oncology. Ruben Mesa reports grants or contracts from AbbVie, Celgene, CTI Biopharma, Constellation Biopharma, Genotech, Incyte, Promedior, Samus Therapeutics, and the Mays Cancer Center P30 Cancer Center Support Grant from the National Cancer Institute (CA054174) and consulting fees from Constellation Biopharma, La Jolla, Novartis, and Sierra Oncology. Miklos Egyed declares no conflict of interest., (© 2024 The Authors. eJHaem published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Exposure to ambient air pollution is associated with a wide range of adverse health effects such as respiratory symptoms, cardiovascular events, and premature mortality. Canada and the United States (US) have worked collaboratively for decades to address transboundary air pollution and its impacts across their shared border. To inform transboundary air quality considerations, we conducted modelling to attribute health impacts from ambient PM 2.5 and O 3 exposure in Canada to Canadian and US emission sources. We employed emissions, chemical transport, and health impacts modelling for 2015, 2025, and 2035 using a brute-force modelling approach whereby anthropogenic domestic and US emissions were reduced separately by 20 % or 100 %, and the resulting changes in health impacts were estimated across Canada. We find that transboundary PM 2.5 and O 3 related health impacts vary widely by region, with >80 % of impacts occurring in Central Canada, and most health impacts occurring within 200-300 km of the Canada-US border. The relative contribution of US sources to O 3 in Canada is larger than for PM 2.5 , yet we find that the health impacts from transboundary PM 2.5 exceeded those from transboundary O 3 . Nationally, we estimate that roughly one in five PM 2.5 deaths in Canada is attributable to US sources (2000 deaths in 2015) and more than one in two O 3 deaths are attributable to US sources (roughly 800 to 1200 deaths in 2015). We project health impacts from domestic and US sources to increase from 2025 to 2035 in Canada. Our results suggest that there are substantial benefits to be gained by domestic and international strategies to reduce PM 2.5 in the Canada-US transboundary region., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

TP53 aberrations predict chemoresistance and represent a contraindication for the use of standard chemoimmunotherapy in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Recent next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based studies have identified frequent low-burden TP53 mutations with variant allele frequencies below 10%, but the clinical impact of these low-burden TP53 mutations is still a matter of debate. In this study, we aimed to scrutinise the subclonal architecture and clinical impact of TP53 mutations using a sensitive, NGS-based mutation analysis in a 'real-world' cohort of 901 patients with CLL. In total, 225 TP53 mutations were identified in 17.5% (158/901) of the patients; 48% of these alterations represented high-burden mutations, while 52% were low-burden TP53 mutations. Low-burden mutations as sole alterations were identified in 39% (62/158) of all mutated cases with 82% (51/62) of these being represented by a single low-burden TP53 mutation. Patients harbouring low-burden TP53 mutations had significantly lower time to first treatment compared to patients with wild-type TP53. Our study has expanded the knowledge on the frequency, clonal architecture, and clinical impact of low-burden TP53 mutations. By demonstrating that patients with sole low-burden TP53 variants represent more than one-third of patients with TP53 mutations and have an increased risk for treatment initiation, our findings strengthen the need to redefine the threshold of TP53 variant reporting to below 10% in the routine diagnostic setting., (© 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research published by The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The oral activin A receptor type I, Janus kinase 1 (JAK1), and JAK2 inhibitor momelotinib demonstrated symptom, spleen, and anemia benefits in intermediate- and high-risk myelofibrosis (MF). Post hoc analyses herein evaluated the efficacy and safety of momelotinib in patients with MF and thrombocytopenia (platelet counts <100 × 10 9 /L) from randomized phase 3 studies: MOMENTUM (momelotinib versus danazol; JAK inhibitor experienced); SIMPLIFY-1 (momelotinib versus ruxolitinib; JAK inhibitor naïve); and SIMPLIFY-2 (momelotinib versus best available therapy; JAK inhibitor experienced); these studies were not statistically powered to assess differences in thrombocytopenic subgroups, and these analyses are descriptive. The treatment effect of momelotinib versus ruxolitinib on week 24 response rates (spleen volume reduction ≥35%/Total Symptom Score reduction ≥50%/transfusion independence) was numerically comparable or better in thrombocytopenic patients versus the overall JAK inhibitor naive population; rates were preserved with momelotinib in thrombocytopenic patients but attenuated with ruxolitinib (momelotinib: 27%/28%/67% overall versus 39%/35%/61% in thrombocytopenic group; ruxolitinib: 29%/42%/49% overall versus 0%/22%/39% in thrombocytopenic group, respectively). In contrast to ruxolitinib, momelotinib maintained high dose intensity throughout the treatment. In the JAK inhibitor experienced population, thrombocytopenic patients had the following: (1) numerically higher symptom and transfusion independence response rates with momelotinib than in control arms; and (2) preserved spleen, symptom, and transfusion independence response rates with momelotinib relative to the overall study populations. The safety profile of momelotinib in thrombocytopenic patients was also consistent with the overall study population. In summary, momelotinib represents a safe and effective treatment option for patients with MF and moderate-to-severe thrombocytopenia., Competing Interests: J-JK reports honoraria from Novartis, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, AOP Orphan, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, and Novartis. AMV reports honoraria from AbbVie, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Incyte, and Novartis, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Incyte, MorphoSys, Novartis, and Roche. ATG reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Constellation/MorphoSys, CTI Biopharma, Novartis, PharmaEssentia, and Sierra Oncology. VG reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Constellation Biopharma, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sierra Oncology; honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Constellation Biopharma, and Novartis; and participation on data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Pfizer, and Roche. SV reports consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Incyte, Novartis, and Sierra Oncology, and research funding from AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, CTI BioPharma, Genentech, Gilead, Incyte, Italfarmaco, Novartis, NS Pharma, PharmaEssentia, and Promedior. UP reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Janssen, and Novartis; honoraria from Amgen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Takeda; and participation on data safety monitoring board or advisor board for AbbVie and Novartis. JM reports research support from Sierra Oncology. AI reports consulting fees from Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda; and meeting/travel support from Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. TW reports meeting/travel support from Novartis and Roche. STO reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, CTI Biopharma, Disc Medicine, Incyte, Kartos Therapeutics, PharmaEssentia, and Sierra Oncology. DML reports grant support from CPI; speaker fees from AbbVie, Celgene, Jazz, and Novartis. S-SY reports grant support from Roche-Genentech and Yuhan Pharmaceuticals; consulting fees from Amgen and Novartis; honoraria for lectures from Novartis; and participation in data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Hanmi and Pharos iBio. CH reports grant support from Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis; consulting fees from AOP, Galecto, Keros, and Roche; honoraria from AbbVie, Celgene, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, CTI Biopharma, Janssen, and Novartis; participation in data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, AOP, CTI Biopharma, Geron, Promedior, Roche, and Sierra Oncology; and leadership or fiduciary role in the European Hematology Association and MPN Voice. BK, MH, and JK report employment and stock or stock options at Sierra Oncology, a GSK company. RM reports grants or contracts from AbbVie, Celgene, CTI Biopharma, Constellation Biopharma, Genotech, Incyte, Promedior, Samus Therapeutics, and the Mays Cancer Center P30 Cancer Center Support Grant from the National Cancer Institute (CA054174), and consulting fees from Constellation Biopharma, LaJolla, Novartis, and Sierra Oncology. All the other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Hematology Association.)

Background: The MOMENTUM study met all key endpoints at week 24, demonstrating symptom, spleen, and anaemia benefits with momelotinib versus danazol in patients with myelofibrosis. In this updated analysis, we report duration of week 24 responses and new responses with momelotinib through week 48., Methods: MOMENTUM is an international, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study done at 107 sites across 21 countries. Patients were 18 years or older with primary, post-polycythaemia vera, or post-essential thrombocythaemia myelofibrosis, previously treated with an approved Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor for 90 days or more (≥28 days with haematological complications), and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to either the momelotinib group (200 mg orally once per day) or danazol group (300 mg orally twice per day) through week 24 via non-deterministic biased coin minimisation and an interactive response system. Stratification factors were Total Symptom Score (TSS; <22 vs ≥22), spleen size (<12 cm vs ≥12 cm), transfusion burden (0 units vs 1-4 units vs ≥5 units), and study site. After week 24, all patients initially randomly assigned to either group who remained on the study received open-label momelotinib. The primary endpoint, which has already been reported, was Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form TSS response rate at week 24. Predefined secondary endpoints were duration of week 24 TSS and transfusion independence responses, safety, and survival, which are summarised post hoc at the week 48 data cutoff (May 17, 2022). TSS, transfusion independence, and splenic responses at week 48 were defined post hoc and assessed in all evaluable patients who entered the open-label period and provided sufficient data. The timing of this updated analysis was defined post hoc after all patients had the opportunity to complete their week 48 assessments, as most patients entered an extended access study (NCT03441113) after week 48. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04173494, and is now complete., Findings: Between April 24, 2020, and Dec 3, 2021, a total of 195 patients were randomised (130 [67%] in the momelotinib group and 65 [33%] in the danazol group). 93 (72%) of 130 patients in the momelotinib group and 41 (63%) of 65 in the danazol group entered the momelotinib open-label extension period. Median follow-up was 48·4 weeks (IQR 40·6-55·7). Among TSS-evaluable patients at week 48, 30 (45%) of 67 patients in the momelotinib group who continued treatment and 15 (50%) of 30 in the danazol group who crossed over were responders. TSS responders at any time during the open-label period by week 48 were 46 (61%) of 75 evaluable patients in the momelotinib group who continued and 19 (59%) of 32 in the danazol group who crossed over, including most week 24 responders plus new responders after week 24. No new safety signals emerged with long-term follow-up. The most common non-haematological treatment-emergent adverse events in momelotinib-treated patients over the entire study period as of the data cutoff were diarrhoea (45 [26%] of 171) and asthenia (28 [16%]); the most common grades 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (33 [19%]) and anaemia (19 [11%]). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 79 (46%) of 171 patients, and fatal treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 30 (18%); two fatal treatment-emergent adverse events were considered possibly related to momelotinib (rotaviral enteritis and Staphylococcus pneumonia)., Interpretation: Momelotinib was associated with durable symptom, spleen, and anaemia benefits, late responses after week 24, and favourable safety through week 48. These results highlight the potential benefits of treatment with momelotinib in patients with myelofibrosis, particularly those with anaemia., Funding: Sierra Oncology, a GSK company., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests ATG reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Constellation/MorphoSys, CTI Biopharma, Imago Biosciences/Merck, Incyte, Pharma Essentia, Sierra Oncology/GSK, and Telios. SV reports consulting fees from GSK. AMV reports payment or honoraria from AbbVie, AOP Health, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Incyte, Novartis, and Roche. HKA-A reports research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and Incyte; honoraria from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, and Novartis; and advisory board participation with AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, and Novartis. DL reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Medisson, and Takeda; payment or honoraria from AbbVie, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda; travel support from AbbVie; and advisory board participation with AbbVie and Medisson. ATK reports consulting fees from CTI Biopharma, GSK, and Imago Biosciences; payment or honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, and MorphoSys; travel support from AbbVie and MorphoSys; and advisory board participation with Incyte. AI reports payment or honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Incyte, Novartis, and Pfizer; and advisory board participation with AOP Health, Incyte, and Novartis. YTG reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, GSK, Novartis, and Pfizer; and payment or honoraria from AbbVie. MLF reports consulting fees from AbbVie, GSK, Novartis, and Sierra Oncology; payment or honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis; and travel support from AbbVie. DM reports a research grant from Imago Biosciences; payment or honoraria from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Jazz Pharma, and Novartis; participation on a data safety monitoring board for the UK ALL-RIC trial; and a leadership or fiduciary role as a member of the EBMT Scientific Council and chair of the EBMT Chronic Malignancies Working Party. S-SY reports grants or contracts from Roche-Genentech, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, and Yuhan Pharma; payment or honoraria from Celgene, Janssen, and Novartis; and advisory board participation with Amgen, Antengene, and Takeda. VG reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Constellation Biopharma, CTI Biopharma, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sierra Oncology; payment or honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene and Novartis; and advisory board participation with AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, CTI Biopharma, Pfizer, Roche, and Sierra Oncology. J-JK reports advisory board participation with AbbVie, AOP Health, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Incyte, and Novartis. FP reports grants or contracts from Bristol Myers Squibb; consulting fees from AbbVie, AOP Orphan, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Kartos, Karyopharm, Kyowa Kirin and MEI, Novartis, Roche, Sierra Oncology, and Sumimoto; and payment or honoraria from AbbVie, AOP Orphan, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Novartis, and Roche. CNH reports payment for study conduct and advisory board participation, related to the present manuscript; consulting fees from DISC, Galecto, and Keros; payment or honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, CTI Biopharma, GSK, Novartis, and Sierra Oncology; advisory board participation with AOP, Keros, Sumimoto, and Telios; and a leadership or fiduciary role with EHA, HemaSphere, and MPN Voice. SO reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cogent, Constellation, CTI Biopharma, Geron, Incyte, Protagonist, and Sierra Oncology. BJK and RD employment and stock/stock options with Sierra Oncology, a GSK company. JY reports employment and stock or stock options with GSK. JK reports employment and stock or stock options with Sierra Oncology, a GSK company; and stock or stock options with Gilead. RM reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Blueprint, Bristol Myers Squibb, CTI, Genentech, Geron, GSK, Incyte, MorphoSys, Novartis, Sierra Oncology, and Telios. All authors received medical writing support related to the present manuscript, funded by GSK. SG, MCL, ME, NG, AP, S-EL, and LO declare no other competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The Hungarian National Registry for Philadelphia chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms was used to analyse the thromboembolic events (TE) of Hungarian patients with polycythemia vera (PV)., Methods: Data from 351 JAK2 V617F-positive patients diagnosed with PV were collected online from 15 haematology centres reporting clinical characteristics, therapeutic interventions and thromboembolic events. TE events were evaluated before and after diagnosis based upon the Landolfi and Tefferi risk assessment scales., Results: TE were reported on 102 patients before diagnosis and 100 during the follow-up period. Comparing to the frequency of major arterial events before PV diagnosis, we can notice a decreasing tendency after diagnosis: from 12.3% to 2.6% (p < .00003). There was no significant change in the rate of major venous events (from 5.1% to 8.5%; p = .1134) or minor arterial events (from 11.7% to 17.4%; p = .073). Bleeding events were recorded in 5.7% of patients. Despite treatment with HU + ASA, 44 patients (43.1%) with prior TE had recurrent thromboembolic complications. The particular analysis of our data revealed a new TE scoring system based on: age, gender, previous TE and iron deficiency at the time of diagnosis., Conclusions: Our registry enables characterisation of patients with PV. The high level of recurrent TE events highlights the need for more effective and risk-adapted therapy., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Momelotinib is the first inhibitor of Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) and JAK2 shown to also inhibit activin A receptor type 1 (ACVR1), a key regulator of iron homeostasis, and has demonstrated improvements in splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, and anemia in myelofibrosis (MF). This long-term analysis pooled data from 3 randomized phase 3 studies of momelotinib (MOMENTUM, SIMPLIFY-1, and SIMPLIFY-2), representing MF disease from early (JAK inhibitor-naive) to late (JAK inhibitor-experienced) stages. Patients in the control arms (danazol in MOMENTUM, ruxolitinib in SIMPLIFY-1, and best available therapy in SIMPLIFY-2) could cross over to receive momelotinib at the end of the 24-week randomized period, and all patients could continue momelotinib treatment after the completion of these studies via an extended access protocol (XAP). Across these studies, 725 patients with MF received momelotinib; 12% remained on therapy for ≥5 years, with a median treatment exposure of 11.3 months (range, 0.1-90.4 months). The most common nonhematologic treatment-emergent adverse event (AE) occurring in ≥20% of patients was diarrhea (any grade, 27% and grade ≥3, 3%). Any-grade thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia occurred in 25%, 23%, and 7% of patients, respectively. The most common reason for momelotinib discontinuation was thrombocytopenia (4% discontinuation rate). The incidence of AEs of clinical importance (eg, infections, malignant transformation, peripheral neuropathy, and hemorrhage) did not increase over time. This analysis of one of the largest randomized trial databases for a JAK inhibitor to date in MF demonstrated a consistent safety profile of momelotinib without long-term or cumulative toxicity. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as: MOMENTUM (#NCT04173494), SIMPLIFY-1 (#NCT01969838), SIMPLIFY-2 (#NCT02101268), and XAP (#NCT03441113)., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

The oral, highly selective Bcl2 inhibitor venetoclax has substantially improved the therapeutic landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Despite the remarkable response rates in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease, acquired resistance is the leading cause of treatment failure, with somatic BCL2 mutations being the predominant genetic drivers underpinning venetoclax resistance. To assess the correlation between disease progression and the most common BCL2 mutations G101V and D103Y, sensitive (10 -4 ) screening for the most common BCL2 mutations G101V and D103Y was performed in 67 R/R CLL patients during venetoclax single-agent or venetoclax-rituximab combination therapy. With a median follow-up time of 23 months, BCL2 G101V and D103Y were detected in 10.4% (7/67) and 11.9% (8/67) of the cases, respectively, with four patients harboring both resistance mutations. Ten out of eleven patients carrying BCL2 G101V and/or D103Y experienced relapse during the follow-up period, representing 43.5% of the cases (10/23) showing clinical signs of disease progression. All BCL2 G101V or D103Y variants were detected in patients receiving venetoclax as a continuous single-agent treatment while these mutations were not observed during or after fixed-duration venetoclax therapy. Targeted ultra-deep sequencing of BCL2 uncovered three additional variants in four patient samples obtained at relapse, suggesting convergent evolution and implying a cooperating role of BCL2 mutations in driving venetoclax resistance. This cohort is the largest R/R CLL patient population reported to date in which BCL2 resistance mutations were investigated. Our study demonstrates the feasibility and clinical value of sensitive screening for BCL2 resistance mutations in R/R CLL.

Background: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors approved for myelofibrosis provide spleen and symptom improvements but do not meaningfully improve anaemia. Momelotinib, a first-in-class inhibitor of activin A receptor type 1 as well as JAK1 and JAK2, has shown symptom, spleen, and anaemia benefits in myelofibrosis. We aimed to confirm the differentiated clinical benefits of momelotinib versus the active comparator danazol in JAK-inhibitor-exposed, symptomatic patients with anaemia and intermediate-risk or high-risk myelofibrosis., Methods: MOMENTUM is an international, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study that enrolled patients at 107 sites across 21 countries worldwide. Eligible patients were 18 years or older with a confirmed diagnosis of primary myelofibrosis or post-polycythaemia vera or post-essential thrombocythaemia myelofibrosis. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive momelotinib (200 mg orally once per day) plus danazol placebo (ie, the momelotinib group) or danazol (300 mg orally twice per day) plus momelotinib placebo (ie, the danazol group), stratified by total symptom score (TSS; <22 vs ≥22), spleen size (<12 cm vs ≥12 cm), red blood cell or whole blood units transfused in the 8 weeks before randomisation (0 units vs 1-4 units vs ≥5 units), and study site. The primary endpoint was the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) TSS response rate at week 24 (defined as ≥50% reduction in mean MFSAF TSS over the 28 days immediately before the end of week 24 compared with baseline). MOMENTUM is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04173494, and is active but not recruiting., Findings: 195 patients were randomly assigned to either the momelotinib group (130 [67%]) or danazol group (65 [33%]) and received study treatment in the 24-week randomised treatment period between April 24, 2020, and Dec 3, 2021. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the momelotinib group reported a 50% or more reduction in TSS than in the danazol group (32 [25%] of 130 vs six [9%] of 65; proportion difference 16% [95% CI 6-26], p=0·0095). The most frequent grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events with momelotinib and danazol were haematological abnormalities by laboratory values: anaemia (79 [61%] of 130 vs 49 [75%] of 65) and thrombocytopenia (36 [28%] vs 17 [26%]). The most frequent non-haematological grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events with momelotinib and danazol were acute kidney injury (four [3%] of 130 vs six [9%] of 65) and pneumonia (three [2%] vs six [9%])., Interpretation: Treatment with momelotinib, compared with danazol, resulted in clinically significant improvements in myelofibrosis-associated symptoms, anaemia measures, and spleen response, with favourable safety. These findings support the future use of momelotinib as an effective treatment in patients with myelofibrosis, especially in those with anaemia., Funding: Sierra Oncology., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SV reports consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Incyte, Novartis, and Sierra Oncology. ATG reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Constellation/MorphoSys, CTI Biopharma, Novartis, Pharma Essentia, and Sierra Oncology. ATK reports grants from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Prelude, and Sierra; consulting fees from AbbVie and Prelude; honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, and Novartis; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, CTI Biopharma, Geron, Imago, and Incyte. MLF reports payment for expert testimony from OncLive; meeting attendance or travel support from Novartis; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, and Sierra Oncology. DM reports research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, and Constellation Biopharma; honoraria from AbbVie, Celgene, Jazz, and Novartis; meeting attendance or travel support from Jazz; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for the ALL-RIC study; and leadership role with the European Society of Hematology and the EBMT Chronic Malignancies Working Party. AP reports honoraria, meeting attendance and travel support, and participation on an advisory board from Novartis Oncology. S-SY reports research grants from Kyowa Kirin and Roche/Genentech; consulting fees from Astellas, Amgen, Antengene, and Celgene; and honoraria from Novartis. VG reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Constellation Biopharma, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sierra Oncology; honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Constellation Biopharma, and Novartis; and participation on data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Pfizer, and Roche. J-JK reports honoraria from Novartis; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, and Novartis. NG reports consulting fees from Alexion, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Incyte, and Novartis; honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Janssen, and Novartis; leadership or fiduciary role for Alexion, Incyte, and Novartis; and meeting attendance or travel support from AbbVie, Genzyme, and Sanofi. FP reports research grant from Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene; consulting fees from AbbVie, APO, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Karyopharm, Kyowa Kirin, MEI, Novartis, and Roche; and honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Janssen, and Novartis. CNH reports grant support from Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Constellation Biopharma, and Novartis; consulting fees from AOP, Galecto, Keros, and Roche; honoraria from AbbVie, Celgene, Constellation Biopharma, CTI Biopharma, Janssen, and Novartis; participation in data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, AOP, CTI Biopharma, Geron, Promedior, Roche, and Sierra Oncology; and leadership or fiduciary role in the European Hematology Association and MPN Voice. BJK, SR, and RD report employment and stock or stock options at Sierra Oncology. JK reports employment and stock or stock options at Sierra Oncology and former employment and stock and stock options from Gilead. RM reports research grants from AbbVie, Celgene, CTI Biopharma, Constellation Biopharma, Genotech, Incyte, Promedior, Samus, and the Mays Cancer Center P30 Cancer Center Support Grant from the National Cancer Institute (CA054174); and consulting fees from Constellation Biopharma, LaJolla, Novartis, and Sierra Oncology. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Here, we present the findings of an investigation involving two male siblings with juvenile total tooth loss, early-onset chronic leg ulcers, and autoimmune thyroiditis, as well as focal segmental glomerulosclerosis with associated pulmonary emphysema in one and diabetes mellitus in the other. The clinical picture and lupus anticoagulant, cryoglobulin, and cold agglutinin positivity suggested the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome. Flow cytometry analysis showed immunophenotypes consistent with immune dysregulation: a low number of naive T cells, elevated CD4 + T cell counts, and decreased CD8 + T-cell counts were detected, and more than half of the T-helper population was activated. Considering the siblings' almost identical clinical phenotype, the genetic alteration was suspected in the background of the immunodeficiency. Whole exome sequencing identified a previously not described hemizygous nonsense variant (c.650G>A, p.W217X) within exon 6 of the moesin ( MSN ) gene localized on chromosome X, resulting in significantly decreased MSN mRNA expression compared to healthy controls. We present a putative new autoimmune phenotype of Immunodeficiency 50 (MIM300988) characterized by antiphospholipid syndrome, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, leg ulcers, and juvenile tooth loss, associated with W217X mutation of the MSN gene., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Kovács, Kárteszi, Prohászka, Kalmár, Késmárky, Koltai, Nagy, Sebők, Vas, Molnár, Berki, Böröcz, Gyömörei, Szalma, Egyed, Horváth, Oláh, Csuka, Németh and Gyulai.)

Background: Despite a number of treatment options, patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) whose disease has become refractory to treatment have a poor prognosis. Selinexor is a novel, oral drug that is approved to treat patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. In this post hoc analysis of the SADAL study, a multinational, open-label study, we evaluated subpopulations to determine if response to single agent selinexor is impacted by number of lines of prior treatment, autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), response to first and most recent therapies, and time to progressive disease., Patients: Patients (n = 134) with DLBCL after 2-5 prior therapies were enrolled in SADAL and received 60mg selinexor twice weekly., Results: The median overall survival was 9.0 months and median progression free survival was 2.6 months. Patients who had the best overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate were those who had prior ASCT (42.5% and 50.0%) or responded to last line of therapy (35.9% and 43.5%). Patients with primary refractory DLBCL also showed responses (ORR 21.8%). Adverse events between subgroups were similar to the overall study population, the most common being thrombocytopenia (29.1%), fatigue (7.5%), and nausea (6.0%)., Conclusion: Regardless of prior therapy and disease refractory status, selinexor treatment demonstrated results consistent with its novel mechanism of action and lack of cross-resistance. Thus, single agent oral selinexor can induce deep, durable, and tolerable responses in patients with DLBCL who have recurrent disease after several chemoimmunotherapy combination regimens., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)