Search

Oral mucositis is a major dose-limiting toxic effect of intensive cancer chemotherapy. Oral complications may lead to dose reduction or delay in further cancer treatment. Mucositis can be caused directly by cytotoxic effects and indirectly by sustained neutropenia after cytostatic therapy. An impaired mucosal barrier predisposes to life-threatening septic complications during aplasia. The prevalence of an oral focus in febrile neutropenia has been reported in up to 30% of cases and also reduces quality of life. The basic strategies aim at pain relief and prevention of bacterial and fungal infectious complications. However, no effective causal prophylaxis or treatment of oral mucositis is widely accepted. The introduction of cytokines, eg granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for oral mucositis may be particularly effective and offer a new and hopeful approach. At present, the optimal growth factor, best schedule, effective dosage and best mode of application is not known.

The rates of fungal infections have increased substantially in Europe as well as in North America. Most frequently Aspergillus spp. and Candida spp. are isolated. Despite the recent introduction of new azoles and lipid-based formulations of amphotericin B, there are relatively few randomized, controlled studies on the use of antifungal drugs in patients with hematological malignancies and invasive fungal infections. Conventional amphotericin B is considered the gold standard for the treatment of invasive fungal infections; however, adverse events limit conventional amphotericin B treatment. The newer azoles, fluconazole and itraconazole, are well tolerated; however, fluconazole has no activity against Aspergillus spp. An additional serious problem is the emerging resistance of nonalbicans Candida spp. to fluconazole. In this situation, lipid formulations of amphotericin B seem to be attractive, since the use of these drugs has been shown to be safe and effective. Considerably higher medical costs limit broader application of lipid formulations of amphotericin B. Because of the rapidly increasing incidence of serious fungal infections, we have reviewed current strategies and the role of newer antifungal drugs for the treatment of deep-organ infections.

Invasive fungal infections have been reported with an increasing incidence over the last 20 years. Fungal infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with hematological malignancies. Therefore, in neutropenic patients different regimens of antifungal prophylaxis have been performed for more than 20 years, but the effect of antifungal prophylaxis is controversial. A long duration of neutropenia, impaired cell-mediated immunity as well as continuous corticosteroid therapy and sustained immunosuppression for graft-versus-host disease in patients treated with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation are known risk factors for invasive mycosis. Since early diagnosis of invasive fungal infection is difficult, strategies to prevent fungal infections seem to be attractive. The introduction of triazoles have provided us with a better armamentarium to prevent fungal infections. In this review, the current strategies of antifungal prophylaxis are discussed. Antifungal prophylaxis has been effective in reducing candida infection, however, there has been no proven successful prevention of invasive aspergillosis. In addition, there is no clearly proven benefit of antifungal prophylaxis regarding the reduction in the overall mortality. Thus the best way to reduce invasive fungal-related mortality will be early diagnosis and preemptive therapeutic approaches.

Febrile neutropenia is associated with a significant risk of complications and mortality. Patients with neutropenia secondary to cytostatic chemotherapy who develop fever are normally admitted to hospital and treated promptly with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Over the last 10 years, chemotherapy for solid tumours has been shifting out of the hospital setting into the ambit of community-based oncologists, and out-patient treatment with complex multidrug protocols is becoming increasingly common. In North America high-dose protocols combined with peripheral blood stem cell transfusion are already being administered on an out-patient basis. With the increase in the numbers of out-patients undergoing multidrug chemotherapy, there has been a corresponding rise in the severity and duration of neutropenia and in the incidence of associated infections. Patients with neutropenia of short duration (<7 days) and fever are at a relatively low risk for complications, and in these circumstances, out-patient antibiotic treatment is an alternative to costly hospitalisation. Drugs, whose antimicrobial coverage and pharmacokinetics make them particularly suitable for out-patient treatment of febrile neutropenia, include intravenous and oral quinolones and, for once-daily dosing, intravenous glycopeptides, ceftriaxone and intravenous aminoglycosides. Response rates of 60-95% have been achieved with such regimens in clinical trials, with hospital admission avoided in 75-95% of the cases. There is no doubt that out-patient treatment improves the quality of life of cancer patients. In Europe, however, there is a need for randomised clinical trials to support the establishment of out-patient-based treatment of febrile neutropenia. Out-patient antibiotic treatment of febrile neutropenia is still not standard practice, and community-based providers of such treatment must be adequately equipped and experienced in the management of this condition.

Oral mucositis is a dose-limiting toxicity of intensive chemotherapy. It is caused directly by the cytotoxic effect of chemotherapeutic agents and indirectly by sustained neutropenia. Severe oral mucositis is an important predisposing factor for life-threatening septic complications during aplasia. It also reduces quality of life. At present, no effective causal prophylaxis or treatment against oral mucositis is established. We performed a prospective randomised placebo-controlled trial using topical oral r-metHuG-CSF (filgrastim) in high-grade lymphoma patients treated according to the B-NHL protocol, which contains high-dose methotrexate and causes severe oral mucositis (WHO grades I-IV) in >50% of patients. Between August 1996 and July 1997, a total of 32 chemotherapy cycles were documented in eight patients (four male, four female). Mucosal erythema and ulceration were recorded. All patients assessed their oral pain and impact on swallowing daily, using a subjective scale from no to maximal discomfort (1-10). In addition, oral mucositis was assessed according to the WHO score. Filgrastim was administered in 16 cycles as a viscous mouthrinse (carboxymethylcellulose 2%, oleum citrii) 4 x 120 microg/day from days 10 to 16. Sixteen cycles were given to control patients, of these 14 with placebo, and another two cycles with no treatment. Severe mucositis (WHO grade III/IV) was documented in 21 of 32 cycles (65.5%). A difference of borderline significance was observed for the reduction of maximum severity of oral mucositis between G-CSF vs placebo (P = 0.058), with a reduction of WHO grade IV of 50% (four G-CSF vs eight control). The number of days in hospital was reduced significantly in the G-CSF group (P = 0.02). In conclusion, topical oral G-CSF mouthrinses may be beneficial to reduce oral mucositis.

A study was performed in low-risk cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia to determine the safety and efficacy of ceftriaxone given in an outpatient setting. A total of 126 episodes of febrile neutropenia in 120 clinically stable outpatients were treated with intravenous ceftriaxone alone (n=100) or in combination with other antibiotics (n=26). The mean neutrophil count was 460/mm3; severe neutropenia (< 100/mm3) was observed in 18 episodes. The initial treatment with ceftriaxone (alone or in combination) was successful in 99 episodes (78%). Ninety-five episodes (76%) were successfully treated in an outpatient setting only; admission to hospital was necessary in 31 episodes (24%), but no infection-related death was observed. Ceftriaxone seems to be safe and effective for outpatient therapy of patients with low-risk febrile neutropenia.

Computer tomography (CT) is known to be as sensitive as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting fungal microabscesses in chronic disseminated candidiasis. However, all imaging techniques have to be repeated in cases of suspected fungal infection. Therefore, use of the CT or MRI scan is limited. Only ultrasound (US) examinations can be repeated as often as needed. The disadvantage of US is a lack of sufficient documentation. We analyzed the value of computer-assisted documentation in serial ultrasonography of leukemia patients with suspected chronic disseminated candidiasis. From November 1996 until October 1997, a total of 220 ultrasound examinations (Kranzbühler Logiq 500, 3.5 MHz convex array) were performed in 58 patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy. Initial US pictures were stored on a personal computer and compared with the live US at the time of reevaluation in cases of persistent fever. Ultrasound detected microabscesses in liver and/or spleen in eight of the 58 patients. Diagnosis was confirmed by autopsy/biopsy (n = 6), blood culture (n = 1), and a significant Candida antibody titer (n = 1). Focal lesions occurred only after neutrophil recovery. However, a newly evolving nonhomogeneous, micronodular pattern of liver and spleen occurred during febrile neutropenia in three patients, and two of these developed focal lesions subsequently. Follow-up was easy, since US pictures could be compared directly with stored examinations on screen. We conclude that serial US is sensitive in detecting microabscesses in the liver or the spleen. Computer-assisted US documentation proved to be a helpful tool for detection as well as in the follow-up of patients with chronic disseminated candidiasis.

In this open label prospective multicenter trial, 420 patients with neutropenia < 1000/microliter, fever > 38.5 degrees C and hematological malignancies were treated with ceftriaxone. Acute leukemia (n = 238) and high-grade lymphoma patients (n = 182) from 35 centers were enrolled. Between February 1992 and January 1996, patients were treated with 2 g ceftriaxone i.v. per day either as monotherapy (n = 135), or in combination with aminoglycosides (n = 235), glycopeptides (n = 37), or other antimicrobial agents (n = 13). Patients' median age was 54 years (range 15 to 97) with a median Karnofsky-performance-score of 6.0. The median neutrophil counts were 400/microliter. Fever was of unknown origin (FUO) in 268 (63.8%) of patients. Clinically defined infections (CDI) were diagnosed in 152 (36.2%) cases, including 74 (17.8%) episodes with pneumonia. Response to the initial approach with ceftriaxone was observed in 56.2% of febrile episodes, including 93 (68.8%) treatment courses with ceftriaxone alone. Concerning defervescence of fever ceftriaxone monotherapy was successful as compared to ceftriaxone in combination. Analysis revealed a low risk characterized by higher neutrophil counts (> or = 500/microliter; p < 0.0001), better Karnofsky-performance-score (> or = 7; p = 0.01), duration of neutropenia (< or = 5 days; p = 0.008) from start of antimicrobial treatment and duration of neutropenia per cycle (< or = 10 days; p = 0.0016). At the end of the observation, an overall response was obtained in 88.3% of the patients (n = 371) without statistical difference between patients treated with ceftriaxone alone or in combination. Once daily ceftriaxone either alone or in combination was effective in patients with hematological malignancies. Monotherapy was effective in a low risk group characterized by neutrophil counts (> or = 500/microliter), a Karnofsky-performance-score (> or = 7) and a duration of neutropenia (< or = 5 days) at the commencement of treatment.

Quality of Life is an increasingly popular concept, often associated with a wish to organize therapy along patient-oriented lines. However, determining the quality of life goes beyond a purely descriptive and objective assessment. It is based on subjective evaluation and is influenced by the ability to adapt to miserable conditions. Further conceptual problems consist in the structure of questionnaires and in the fact that there is no consensus about a clear definition of quality of life. The ideal of multidimensionality is restricted by practical limits of acceptable time and tolerable number of questions. Nevertheless most of the modern instruments focus on the patient's well-being and promote the realisation of their individual preferences. The hope is that quality of life will be an additional scale to enhance the established criteria of treatment success like survival time and remission duration. There is the risk to set value-thresholds on life, which appears to be inappropriate. Quality of life assessment may refine the choices of therapeutic aids, but can never solve the difficult moral questions that appertain to the value of life.

Neutropenia is common after intensive chemotherapy. Hospitalization and intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics are the standard of care for febrile neutropenic patients because of the risk of serious complications and associated mortality. Short neutropenic periods (< 7 days) are considered to be at a low-risk in cases when fever occurs in clinically stable patients. Recent work suggests that such a low-risk population of febrile neutropenic patients might benefit from alternatives to inpatient care. The agents that best qualify for outpatient treatment include quinolones i.v./p.o., glycopeptides, ceftriaxone and aminoglycosides, particularly if the latter are given once daily. Response rates to antimicrobial therapy range from 80 to 95% in low-risk febrile neutropenia episodes. Treating these patients in an outpatient setting avoids hospitalization in 75 to 95%. There is no doubt that outpatient therapy may have several advantages, including lower costs and an improved quality of live. Outpatient antibiotic therapy for febrile low-risk neutropenia should be considered as an acceptable alternative to inpatient treatment.

We report on a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with a rapidly growing left cervical tumor 5 months after the initial diagnosis of CML. This tumor was diagnosed as a very early manifestation of extramedullary myeloblastoma by a minimally invasive method. A fine needle aspirate (26-gauge needle) was obtained from the tumor. Morphological and cytochemical analysis of the aspirate revealed 19% undifferentiated blasts. The immunophenotype was suggestive of a myeloid differentiation of the blasts (CD33+). The CML origin of the blasts was confirmed by the detection of the bcr-abl gene rearrangement in the blasts by two-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). We conclude that fine needle aspiration in combination with immunophenotyping and FISH analysis of the aspirate is a minimally invasive and rapid diagnostic tool to confirm extramedullary manifestation in CML. To our knowledge, this is the first case of extramedullary myeloblastoma confirmed by this combined technique.

A 28-year-old female patient underwent allogeneic PBSCT from her HLA-identical sister for AML in first CR. CD34+ cells were positively selected from PBPC using immunoaffinity columns. She received 8.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg and 1.74 x 10(6) CD3+ cells/kg body weight (BW). The patient developed acute GVHD III and mild limited chronic GVHD. Thirteen months after transplantation severe thyrotoxicosis requiring plasmapheresis occurred. Immune thyroiditis was confirmed cytologically by lymphocytic infiltration in a fine needle aspirate and by elevated thyroid-Ab-titers. The patient's donor had received thyroid hormone substitution for 10 years for hypothyroidism. The most probable cause of immune thyroiditis after allogeneic BMT is the transfer of antithyroid donor lymphocytes. These lymphocytes can also be transferred with a CD34+ selected peripheral stem cell graft. The transplantation of lymphocyte-depleted autologous bone marrow or PBPC grafts after myeloablative treatment is increasingly considered as potential treatment of severe autoimmune diseases. This case demonstrates that even low numbers of lymphocytes are capable of transferring autoimmune disorders.

Acute abdominal pain is a frequent diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in hematologic patients. We report on the very rare case of organ endometriosis with acute abdominal symptoms in a 43-year-old female patient with AML-M5, starting 4 days after induction chemotherapy with idarubicin, ara-C, and etoposide. The patient presented with an acute abdomen with clinical findings of acute cholecystitis, subileus, and local pain in the right upper abdomen accompanied by severe diarrhea. Probably due to impaired intestinal resorption, menstrual bleeding occurred despite regular administration of lynestrenol. Ultrasound examination of the abdomen disclosed a tumor with poor echoes in the pouch of Douglas, a subcapsular splenic hemorrhage, and a thickened gallbladder wall with surrounding edema. A cystic adnex tumor was confirmed by endovaginal ultrasound. Based on history and the findings on ultrasound, an endometriosis was diagnosed, and the LHRH agonist (nafarelin) was administered nasally in combination with lynestrenol. Following this medication the abdominal pain ceased, supporting the diagnosis of endometriosis. Nasal administration of an LHRH agonist in the following cycles of chemotherapy was effective in preventing further abdominal discomfort and vaginal bleeding. LHRH agonists should be given to patients with known endometriosis before starting myeloablative chemotherapy to prevent painful hemorrhage from endometriosis.

With the identification and recombinant production of the hematopoietic growth factors, these cytokines have been evaluated in the treatment of primary bone marrow failure states and following myelosuppressive chemotherapy or radiotherapy. An increasing number of clinical trials with hematopoietic factors have been performed in patients with haematological and oncological diseases. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), erythropoietin and, in phase I/II trials, thrombopoietin (TPO) are available for the clinical use. Most studies have been performed with G-CSF and GM-CSF, their beneficial effects are proven regarding acceleration of hematopoietic recovery following chemotherapy. This results in a marked reduction of infectious risks and a shortening of drug- and radiation-induced myelosuppression. CSFs are most important in mobilizing peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and have allowed high-dose therapy combined with stem cell support in gynecological malignancies, e.g. ovarian carcinoma and breast cancer. However, evidence based, clinical practical guidelines for the use of hematopoietic growth factors in gynecological malignancies are not for all circumstances available.

With the identification and recombinant production of the hematopoietic growth factors, these cytokines have been evaluated in the treatment of primary bone marrow failure states and after myelosuppressive chemotherapy or radiotherapy. A lot of clinical trials with hematopoietic factors have been performed in patients with haematologic and oncologic diseases within the last decade. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor [GM-CSF], interleukin-3, interleukin-2, erythropoietin and in phase I/II trials thrombopoietin [TPO] are available for the clinical use. At the present, there is a broad use of growth factors. Most studies have been done with G-CSF and GM-CSF, their beneficial effects are proven regarding improvement of hematopoietic recovery after chemotherapy. This results in a marked reduction of infectious risks and a shortening of drug- and radiation-induced myelosuppression. CSFs are most important in mobilizing peripheral blood progenitor cells [PBPC] and have allowed high dose therapy to be given to patients who would not have been able to undergo conventional bone marrow transplantation. However, an improved outcome and improved survival rates with standard chemotherapy protocols couldn't be documented by studies up to now, even though higher chemotherapy doses are possible by the use of hematopoietic factors.