Search

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic challenged the management of technical and human resources in intensive care units (ICU) across the world. Several long-term predictors for COVID-19 disease progression have been discovered. However, predictors to support short-term planning of resources and medication that can be translated to future pandemics are still missing. A workflow was established to identify a predictor for short-term COVID-19 disease progression in the acute phase of intensive care patients to support clinical decision-making., Methods: Thirty-two patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were recruited on admission to the ICU and clinical data collected. During their hospitalization, plasma samples were acquired from each patient on multiple occasions, excepting one patient for which only one time point was possible, and the proteome (Inflammation, Immune Response and Organ Damage panels from Olink® Target 96), metabolome and lipidome (flow injection analysis and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry) analyzed for each sample. Patient visits were grouped according to changes in disease severity based on their respiratory and organ function, and evaluated using a combination of statistical analysis and machine learning. The resulting short-term predictor from this multi-omics approach was compared to the human assessment of disease progression. Furthermore, the potential markers were compared to the baseline levels of 50 healthy subjects with no known SARS-CoV-2 or other viral infections., Results: A total of 124 clinical parameters, 271 proteins and 782 unique metabolites and lipids were assessed. The dimensionality of the dataset was reduced, selecting 47 from the 1177 parameters available following down-selection, to build the machine learning model. Subsequently, two proteins (C-C motif chemokine 7 (CCL7) and carbonic anhydrase 14 (CA14)) and one lipid (hexosylceramide 18:2; O2/20:0) were linked to disease progression in the studied SARS-CoV-2 infections. Thus, a predictor delivering the prognosis of an upcoming worsening of the patient's condition up to five days in advance with a reasonable accuracy (79 % three days prior to event, 84 % four to five days prior to event) was found. Interestingly, the predictor's performance was complementary to the clinicians' capabilities to foresee a worsening of a patient., Conclusion: This study presents a workflow to identify omics-based biomarkers to support clinical decision-making and resource management in the ICU. This was successfully applied to develop a short-term predictor for aggravation of COVID-19 symptoms. The applied methods can be adapted for future small cohort studies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest ☐ The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The influence of sex on treatment outcomes during interleukin-12/23 therapy in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has not been explored., Objective: To conduct exploratory post hoc analyses of sex-stratified data from the MUST trial, an investigator-initiated, multicentre, phase 3b study in which patients with active PsA initiating treatment with open-label ustekinumab were randomised to treatment with placebo or methotrexate (MTX)., Methods: We evaluated baseline characteristics, key treatment outcomes and adverse events stratified by sex, with a focus on outcomes that did not include erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) as a component due to the known elevation of ESR in females., Results: A total of 166 patients were treated with ustekinumab+MTX (37 female, 50 male) or ustekinumab+placebo (32 female, 47 male). At baseline, females had a significantly longer time since PsA diagnosis and greater impairment in physical function, but similar joint counts. At week 24, both females and males showed marked improvements to ustekinumab with or without MTX. Females generally had numerically reduced treatment responses compared with males, although differences did not achieve statistical significance. MTX did not show an overall effect on treatment outcomes, but was associated with faster enthesitis responses in males only. Adverse events were generally comparable, but females in the ustekinumab+MTX group had higher levels of gastrointestinal disorders., Conclusion: Females and males with PsA had differences in baseline characteristics, treatment responses and adverse events during therapy. A better understanding of sex-based differences in PsA may help optimise treatment., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MK received consulting fees or honoraria from Amgen, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, Novartis and UCB and received travel support from UCB. UK received grant and research support and consultancy fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Biocad, Biogen, BMS, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Fresenius, Gilead, Grünenthal, GSK, Hexal, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, onkowissen.de, Pfizer, Roche, UCB and Viatris and participated on a data safety monitoring or advisory board for the COPAGO trial, conducted by the German Ministry of Health. GRB received fees or honoraria for serving as a speaker and/or consultant from Abbvie, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis and UCB, meeting or travel support from Abbvie and Lilly and is the editor-in-chief of RMD Open. DMK received honoraria for serving as a speaker for Sanofi-Aventis. SF received scientific grants from Novartis, honoraria or fees for serving as a speaker and/or consultant from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Chugai, Galapagos, Novartis, NovoNordisc and UCB, and travel or meeting support from Abbvie, Galapagos, Janssen Cilag, Novartis, SOBI and UCB. RB received honoraria or fees for serving as a speaker and/or consultant from Abbvie, BMS, Chugai, GSK, Galapagos, Novartis, Roche and Vifor and meeting or travel support from Chugai and Galapagos. MS received research support from Charité. FB received research support for this study from Janssen Cilag, consulting fees or honoraria from Abbvie, Acelyrin, Amgen, Janssen Cilag, Lily, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, and meeting or travel support from Abbvie and UCB. ACF, TR, HK and JB have no competing interests to declare., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: We investigated the impact of concomitant MTX on ustekinumab (UST) levels and antidrug antibody (ADA) formation in PsA and evaluated consequences in pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics., Methods: We conducted a post-hoc analysis on 112 PsA serum samples of subjects treated with open-label UST and either concomitant MTX (UST/MTX, n = 58) or placebo (UST/pbo, n = 54) obtained in a randomized (1:1), double-blind, multicentre trial. A validated antibody-binding-based multitiered testing was used to detect ADA and ADA with neutralizing capacity (nADA). The impact of MTX on UST immunogenicity was analysed by comparison of UST/pbo with UST/MTX cohorts at different time points. Patient- and disease-related predispositions for ADA formation were investigated with multiple linear regression analysis. Immunogenicity impact on pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy was determined by cohort comparison between patients with and without ADA formation., Results: Over 52 weeks, 11 UST/pbo- and 19 UST/MTX-treated patients developed ADA (P > 0.05). In the UST/pbo cohort, the visit-dependent UST levels were in the range of 0.047 (0.05) -0.110 (0.07) µg/ml overall, and 0.037 (0.04)-0.091 (0.08) µg/ml in ADA-confirmed subjects. In UST/MTX-treated patients, the UST levels exhibited an intervisit variation in the range of 0.0502 (0.04)-0.106 (0.07) µg/ml overall and 0.029 (0.03)-0.097 (0.07) µg/ml in ADA positive subjects (P > 0.05). At week 52, ADA-confirmed patients did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) in safety or clinical outcomes from ADA-negative patients., Conclusion: Concomitant MTX had no significant impact on UST immunogenicity. Furthermore, ADA formation was not associated with impairments in UST safety, efficacy or trough levels., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03148860., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

At the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) 2022 annual meeting, the Collaborative Research Network (CRN) met to present updates on several projects. These included the GRAPPA-Industry biomarker projects, Axial Psoriatic Arthritis Molecular and Clinical Characterisation Study, Axial Involvement in Psoriatic Arthritis Cohort (AXIS) study, and the Health Initiatives in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Consortium European States (HIPPOCRATES). The meeting concluded with a discussion on pathways to further academia-industry collaboration., (Copyright © 2023 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)

Background and Objective: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic systemic inflammatory disease affecting the musculoskeletal system, skin and nails. The aim is to characterize sociodemographic and clinical patient profiles documented in dermatologic and rheumatologic care., Patients and Methods: Data of 704 patients with PsA from the dermatological Psoriasis Registry PsoBest (PB) and 1066 patients from the rheumatological disease registry RABBIT-SpA (RS) were analyzed. Comparable anamnestic and clinical variables were identified and descriptively analyzed., Results: The mean age was 51.7 years in PB and 51.9 in RS. Disease duration of psoriasis was longer, mean cutaneous severity was higher in PB. However, more patients in RS vs. PB had tender joints and swollen joints. Mean Dermatology Life Quality Index was higher in PB and mean Health Assessment Questionnaire in RS. Patient reported global disease activity and pain were lower in PB. IL-23 inhibitors were used more frequently in PB, and TNF inhibitors in RS., Conclusions: Clinical specialization was associated with different clinical and treatment patterns of PsA. This may indicate a selection by dominant manifestation of psoriatic disease and potentially by effects of health care access. Psoriatic arthritis should be treated in a multidisciplinary approach considering all facets of this complex disease., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft.)

Nail psoriasis is a difficult-to-treat manifestation of psoriatic disease affecting up to 80% of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and 40-60% of patients with plaque psoriasis (PsO). Ixekizumab (IXE), a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin-17A, is approved for the treatment of patients with PsA and patients with moderate-to-severe PsO. This narrative review aims to summarize nail psoriasis data generated from IXE clinical trials in patients with PsA (SPIRIT-P1, SPIRIT-P2, and SPIRIT-H2H) and/or moderate-to-severe PsO (UNCOVER-1, -2, -3, IXORA-R, IXORA-S, and IXORA-PEDS) with an emphasis on head-to-head clinical trial data. Across numerous trials explored, IXE treatment was associated with greater improvement in resolution of nail disease versus comparators at week 24, results which were maintained up to and beyond week 52. Additionally, patients experienced higher rates of resolution of nail disease versus comparators at week 24 and maintained high levels of resolution up to week 52 and beyond. In both PsA and PsO, IXE demonstrated efficacy in treating nail psoriasis, and therefore may be an effective therapy option. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier UNCOVER-1 (NCT01474512), UNCOVER-2 (NCT01597245), UNCOVER-3 (NCT01646177), IXORA-PEDS (NCT03073200), IXORA-S (NCT02561806), IXORA-R (NCT03573323), SPIRIT-P1 (NCT01695239), SPIRIT-P2 (NCT02349295), SPIRIT-H2H (NCT03151551)., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory immune-mediated disease that affects approximately 30% of psoriasis patients. In most cases, skin disease clearly precedes the musculoskeletal disease. Some studies suggest that targeted treatment may intercept the disease course and prevent psoriasis patients from developing PsA. A recent population-based retrospective analysis in 15 501 psoriasis patients evaluated the association between different biological treatment strategies and time to incident inflammatory arthritis based on data in a US electronic health records database. A cumulative incidence of 2.6 PsA cases per 100 person-years was determined. The multivariable regression analysis revealed a significantly lower risk of developing inflammatory arthritis in patients who had been prescribed interleukin (IL)-12/23 or IL-23 inhibitors compared with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor-treated patients, whereas there was no significant difference in risk for patients prescribed inhibitors of IL-17 versus TNF. Although the analysis was based on a large set of clinical data and the findings were rigorously evaluated, there are some limitations in interpretation due to the study design. Prospective clinical trials are missing, and retrospective data analyses from clinical trials or population-based studies show conflicting results. Overall, the recent data on prevention of PsA in patients with psoriasis support the high need to characterise biomarkers of increased risk and perform prospective clinical trials to give a clear guidance on possibilities for disease interception in psoriatic disease., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MK received consulting fees or honoraria from Amgen, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, Novartis and UCB, and received travel support from UCB, AbbVie and Janssen-Cilag. FB received consulting fees or honoraria from Abbvie, Acelyrin, Amgen, Janssen Cilag, Lily, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, and meeting or travel support from Abbvie and UCB., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: To evaluate the potential of immunosuppressed patients to mount B-cell and T-cell responses to COVID-19 booster vaccination (third vaccination)., Methods: Patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID), immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) on CD20-depleting treatment with rituximab (RTX), or IMIDs treated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARDs) were included and assessed before (baseline visit (BL)) and 2, 4 and 8 weeks after COVID-19 booster vaccination. Serum B-cell responses were assessed by antibody levels against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (anti-spike IgG antibody (S-AB)) and a surrogate virus neutralisation test (sVNT). T-cell responses were assessed by an interferon gamma release assay (IGRA)., Results: Fifty patients with PID (n=6), treated with RTX therapy (n=13), or treated with csDMARDs/bDMARDs (n=31) were included. At BL, anti-S-AB titres in PID and csDMARD/bDMARD-treated patients were low (although significantly higher than RTX patients); measures of B-cell-mediated response increased significantly after booster vaccination. In the RTX cohort, low BL anti-S-AB and sVNT values did not improve after booster vaccination, but patients had significantly elevated IGRA responses post booster vaccination compared with the other groups. csDMARD/bDMARD-treated patients showed the highest BL values in all three assays with greater increases in all parameters after booster vaccination compared with patients with PID., Conclusion: Patients with IMID on therapeutic B-cell depletion have low anti-S-AB and sVNT values before and after booster vaccination but show significantly higher levels of IGRA compared with other immunosuppressed patients, suggesting an underlying mechanism attempting to compensate compromised humoral immunity by upregulating T-cell responsiveness. PID appears to have a stronger impact on antiviral immune response than csDMARD/bDMARD treatment., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Fraunhofer ITMP, the sponsor of this study, supported MKo, MKl, SD, KH, HB, SC, GG and FB. NK received speaker's fees from Abbott Laboratories. HB received research support from the Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence for Immune-mediated Diseases (a non-profit organisation). HFR has no conflicts of interest to declare., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: To investigate long-term effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC) in the routine clinical care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: ARATA (ML29087) was a prospective, multicentre, observational study of adult patients with active RA initiating therapy with TCZ-SC. The primary effectiveness outcome was the proportion of patients achieving DAS28-ESR <2.6 at week 104. Additional efficacy outcomes included individual DAS28-dcrit responses (improvement of ≥1.8 from baseline), CDAI remission (≤2.8), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including Work Productivity and Activity Impairment scores. Adverse event rates were used to evaluate safety and tolerability., Results: Between May 2014 and July 2018, 114 study centres in Germany enrolled 1,300 patients with RA who received at least one dose of TCZ-SC (mean age 57.3 [SD 12.5] years, mean DAS28-ESR of 4.9 [SD 1.3]). At week 104, 58.7% (365/622) patients achieved DAS28-ESR <2.6, 64.0% had an individual DAS28-dcrit response, and 31.4% (241/767) achieved CDAI remission. PROs, including patient global assessment, pain, and fatigue, showed marked improvements from baseline. Work outcomes, including absenteeism (missed work) and presenteeism (productivity while at work), also improved. Injection reactions were rare and no new safety signals occurred. Patients expressed a high level of satisfaction with treatment. Baseline patient characteristics and outcomes were similar for ARATA and ICHIBAN (an observational study of TCZ-IV in Germany), despite different formulations and time periods., Conclusions: The safety and effectiveness of TCZ-SC is maintained over 2 years during routine clinical care. TCZ-SC represents a convenient and effective option for RA patients who prefer SC administration.

Background: Fetal/neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is a rare and potentially life-threatening bleeding disorder of the fetus/newborn. Antibodies against human platelet antigen 1a (HPA-1a) are associated with the most frequent FNAIT cases. There are no approved therapies for FNAIT prevention or treatment. RLYB211 is a polyclonal HPA-1a hyperimmune IgG being developed to prevent FNAIT., Objectives: To investigate whether a single dose of anti-HPA-1a (1000 IU) could markedly accelerate the elimination of HPA-1ab platelets transfused into healthy, HPA-1a-negative participants as compared with placebo., Methods: This randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center, phase 1/2 proof-of-concept study (EudraCT: 2019-003459-12) included HPA-1a- and HLA-A2-negative healthy men. Cohort 1 received intravenous RLYB211 or placebo 1 hour after transfusion of HPA-1ab platelets. Cohort 1B received RLYB211 or placebo, followed by platelet transfusion 1 week later. Primary endpoint was the half-life of transfused platelets in circulation after administration of RLYB211 or placebo, determined by flow cytometry. Proof of concept was ≥90% reduction of half-life relative to placebo., Results: Twelve participants were allocated to cohort 1 or 1B and randomized to receive RLYB211 (n = 9) or placebo (n = 3). RLYB211 markedly accelerated the elimination of HPA-1ab platelets in all participants vs placebo. In cohort 1B, this effect was observed 7 days after RLYB211 administration. Two treatment-emergent adverse events were possibly related to treatment, both in RLYB211-treated participants. No participants developed HPA-1a antibodies at 12 or 24 weeks., Conclusion: These data support the hypothesis that anti-HPA-1a could be used as prophylaxis in women at risk of having an FNAIT-affected pregnancy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests M.Kj., B.S., and J.KK. are stockholders of Prophylix AS, a Norwegian biotech company, which produced the study drug. M.Kj. and J.KK. are currently consultants for Rallybio, which is the sponsor of the study. R.A. and Z.B. are employees of Rallybio. J.KK. also provides consultancy services for ROS Therapeutics, Glycorex Transplantation AB, and Johnson & Johnson. German Red Cross Blood Donor Service Baden-Württemberg-Hessen gGmbH has a contract with Rallybio for the present study. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Randomised clinical studies in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) do not always reflect patients in routine clinical practice. Large-scale data from routine practice are needed to better understand drug persistence, effectiveness and long-term safety of therapeutic agents., Methods: PsABIOnd is an international, prospective, observational study designed to collect long-term routine care data in patients with PsA who receive guselkumab (an interleukin-23 [IL-23] inhibitor) or an interleukin-17 (IL-17) inhibitor. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of PsA who are starting guselkumab or any approved IL-17 inhibitor as a first, second, third or fourth line of PsA treatment and who provide written informed consent will be eligible to participate. Participants will be followed for a maximum of 36 months (+3 months) from the start of treatment. Study visits will occur in line with the standard of care, approximately every 6 months, plus an additional visit at 3 months after the start of treatment. eDaily by PsABIOnd - aneHealth substudy, will document the impact of these treatments on wellbeing and symptoms in a subgroup of participants over a 24-week (+4 weeks) observation period on treatment., Planned Outcomes: The primary objective of PsABIOnd is to evaluate treatment persistence with guselkumab and IL-17 inhibitors. Data sources will include validated electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) and physician-completed assessments. Safety data will be collected through reporting adverse events. The eDaily by PsABIOnd substudy will use wearable and digital technologies for continuous activity and sleep monitoring, and frequent patient eDiary and ePRO collection to provide a more detailed and comprehensive picture of PsA., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05049798., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) show certain overlaps: A subset of patients with PsA can develop axial involvement (axial PsA, axPsA), while a subset of patients with axSpA presents with psoriasis (axSpA+pso). Treatment strategy for axPsA is mostly based on axSpA evidence., Objectives: To compare demographic and disease-specific parameters of axPsA and axSpA+pso., Methods: RABBIT-SpA is a prospective longitudinal cohort study. AxPsA was defined based on (1) clinical judgement by rheumatologists; (2) imaging (sacroiliitis according to modified New York criteria in radiographs or signs of active inflammation in MRI or syndesmophytes/ankylosis in radiographs or signs of active inflammation in spine MRI). axSpA was stratified into axSpA+pso and axSpA without pso., Results: Psoriasis was documented in 181/1428 axSpA patients (13%). Of 1395 PsA patients, 359 (26%) showed axial involvement. 297 patients (21%) fulfilled the clinical definition and 196 (14%) the imaging definition of axial manifestation of PsA. AxSpA+pso differed from axPsA regardless whether clinical or imaging definition was used. axPsA patients were older, more often female and less often HLA-B27+. Peripheral manifestations were more often present in axPsA than in axSpA+pso, whereas uveitis and inflammatory bowel disease were more common in axSpA+pso. Burden of disease (patient global, pain, physician global) was similar among axPsA and axSpA+pso patients., Conclusions: AxPsA differs from axSpA+pso in its clinical manifestations, irrespective of whether axPsA is defined clinically or by imaging. These findings support the hypothesis that axSpA and PsA with axial involvement are distinct entities, so extrapolation of treatment data from randomised controlled trials in axSpA should be performed with caution., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The role of methotrexate in combination with biological agents in patients with psoriatic arthritis remains unclear. The MUST phase 3b trial aimed to compare the efficacy of ustekinumab plus placebo with ustekinumab plus methotrexate in patients with active psoriatic arthritis., Methods: In this investigator-initiated, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3b non-inferiority trial done in 22 centres in Germany, patients with active psoriatic arthritis received open-label ustekinumab and were randomly assigned (1:1) to masked concomitant therapy with placebo or methotrexate (ongoing or new). The primary outcome was non-inferiority of mean Disease Activity Score-28 joints (DAS28) at week 24 for ustekinumab monotherapy (ustekinumab plus placebo) versus ustekinumab combination therapy (ustekinumab plus methotrexate), stratified by previous methotrexate treatment. The key secondary analysis was non-inferiority of DAS28 at week 52. The primary analysis was based on a stratified van Elteren test with an α of 2·5% and a non-inferiority margin of 12·5% by Mann-Whitney estimator. Adverse events and serious adverse events were assessed. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03148860., Findings: Between Jan 24, 2017, and April 12, 2021, 186 patients with active psoriatic arthritis were screened, of whom 173 (93%) patients were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive concomitant methotrexate therapy (n=88) or placebo (n=85). 84 patients were receiving methotrexate at baseline, and 89 patients had no previous methotrexate treatment. 166 (96%) patients (87 in the ustekinumab plus methotrexate group and 79 in the ustekinumab plus placebo group) were included in the safety and efficacy analyses at week 24 (69 [42%] female; 97 [58%] male; mean age 48·2 years [SE 1·1]). Ustekinumab plus placebo was non-inferior to ustekinumab plus methotrexate in DAS28 at week 24 (2·9 [SD 1·31] vs 3·1 [1·42]); the stratified Mann-Whitney estimator for treatment comparison was 0·5426 (95% CI 0·4545-0·6307). Non-inferiority for ustekinumab plus placebo was also observed in DAS28 at week 52. Serious adverse events occurred in seven (9%) patients in the ustekinumab plus placebo group and eight (9%) patients in the ustekinumab plus methotrexate group. No specific serious adverse events affected more than one patient, and there were no deaths., Interpretation: Interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 inhibition with ustekinumab is an effective treatment for psoriatic arthritis independent of methotrexate use; concomitant methotrexate did not increase efficacy of ustekinumab (based on DAS28). On the basis of these data, there is no evidence to support the addition or maintainance of methotrexate when initiating ustekinumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis., Funding: Janssen Cilag., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MK received grants or contracts from BMS, Bionorica, Iron4u, Janssen-Cilag, LEO, Novartis, and Pfizer and received travel support or honoraria or fees for serving as a speaker, consultant and/or advisory board member from Abbvie, Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. GRB received honoraria or fees for serving as a speaker and/or consultant from Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Galapagos, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi. UK received scientific grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Fresenius, GSK, Hexal, Novartis, Pfizer and honoraria or fees for serving as a speaker and/or consultant from Abbvie, Biocad, Biogen, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Fresenius, Hexal, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB. JR received scientific grants from Novartis and Sobi, and honoraria or fees for serving as a speaker and/or consultant from Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Chugai, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sobi, and UCB. SM-P received honoraria or fees for serving as a speaker and/or consultant from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, and Novartis. HB received travel support or honoraria or fees for speaking from Janssen Cilag and research support from the Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence for Immune-mediated diseases (CIMD). FB received research support from Janssen Cilag, the Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence for Immune-mediated diseases (CIMD), and LOEWE Zentrum Translational Medicine and Pharmacology, grants or contracts from BMS, Bionorica, Iron4u, Janssen-Cilag, LEO, Novartis, and Pfizer, and meeting support or honoraria or fees for serving as a speaker, consultant, and/or advisory board member from Abbvie, Affibody, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen Cilag, Lilly, MoonLake, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi, and UCB. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate the ability of fluorescence-optical imaging (FOI) to detect preclinical musculoskeletal inflammatory signs in patients with skin psoriasis at risk of developing psoriatic arthritis (PsA)., Methods: This investigator-initiated prospective exploratory study evaluated adult patients with psoriasis with musculoskeletal complaints and/or nail psoriasis within the last 6 months. Patients underwent a comprehensive rheumatological clinical examination (CE) along with musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) and FOI of both hands at a single visit. Patients with CE-/MSUS-/FOI+ findings had MRI performed on the symptomatic or dominant hand within 7 days. If MRI was negative, the patients were followed over 2 years for the onset of clinically manifest PsA., Results: A total of 389 patients were referred from dermatology centres and evaluated at 14 rheumatology sites in Germany. Seventy-seven (20%) patients with CE-/US-/FOI- were considered to have psoriasis only. PsA was diagnosed in 140/389 patients (36%) based on CE alone and in another 55 patients (14%) by additional MSUS; overall, 50% of the patient cohort was diagnosed with PsA. One hundred sixteen patients (30%) were FOI+ (CE-) of which 40 (37%) were FOI+/MRI+. In the 2-year follow-up of the FOI+/CE- patients, clinical PsA was confirmed in another 12%., Conclusion: FOI is a promising method for the detection of signs of musculoskeletal inflammation in hands that may serve as an early imaging biomarker for transitions from psoriasis to PsA. This imaging technique has the potential to detect PsA in at-risk patients with psoriasis, reduce time to PsA diagnosis and improve patient outcomes., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MK, ACF, TR, HB and FB are supported by Fraunhofer ITMP, the sponsor of this study. MK received research grants from Bionorica, BMS, Iron4u, LEO, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis and Pfizer and speaker’s fees, consulting fees and/or conference support from AbbVie, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. SGW participated in project planning boards with the owner of Xiralite GmbH and Pfizer as sponsor, but did not receive personal compensation. GRB is on the editorial board of RMD Open. SW received speaker’s fees and/or conference support from AbbVie, Gilead, Lilly, MSD, Mylan, Pfizer, Rheumaklinik Sendenhorst, Rheumatologische Fortbildungsakademie (Berlin), Rheumazentrum Rhein Ruhr, Sanofi, streamedup and UCB, and participated on data safety monitoring or advisory boards for AbbVie, BMS, Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly and UCB. BK received funding from Fraunhofer Institute for this study, speaker’s fees, conference support and/or advisory board fees from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celegen, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer. HB received research support from the Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence for Immune-mediated Diseases (a non-profit organisation) and speaker’s fees, consulting fees and/or conference support from Janssen-Cilag and Roche. FB received grants/research support from Bionorica, BMS, Iron4u, Janssen-Cilag, LEO, Novartis and Pfizer, speaker’s fees, consulting fees and/or conference support from AbbVie, Affibody, Amgen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, MoonLake, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi and UCB and serves on data safety monitoring or advisory boards for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer, Galapagos, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi and UCB., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

The definitive diagnosis and early treatment of many immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) is hindered by variable and overlapping clinical manifestations. Psoriatic arthritis (PsA), which develops in ~30% of people with psoriasis, is a key example. This mixed-pattern IMID is apparent in entheseal and synovial musculoskeletal structures, but a definitive diagnosis often can only be made by clinical experts or when an extensive progressive disease state is apparent. As with other IMIDs, the detection of multimodal molecular biomarkers offers some hope for the early diagnosis of PsA and the initiation of effective management and treatment strategies. However, specific biomarkers are not yet available for PsA. The assessment of new markers by genomic and epigenomic profiling, or the analysis of blood and synovial fluid/tissue samples using proteomics, metabolomics and lipidomics, provides hope that complex molecular biomarker profiles could be developed to diagnose PsA. Importantly, the integration of these markers with high-throughput histology, imaging and standardized clinical assessment data provides an important opportunity to develop molecular profiles that could improve the diagnosis of PsA, predict its occurrence in cohorts of individuals with psoriasis, differentiate PsA from other IMIDs, and improve therapeutic responses. In this review, we consider the technologies that are currently deployed in the EU IMI2 project HIPPOCRATES to define biomarker profiles specific for PsA and discuss the advantages of combining multi-omics data to improve the outcome of PsA patients.

Objective: ACHILLES aimed to demonstrate efficacy of secukinumab on Achilles' tendon enthesitis in spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients., Methods: Patients ≥18 years (n = 204) with active PsA or axial SpA and heel enthesitis were randomized 1:1 to secukinumab 150/300 mg or placebo up to week 24, and thereafter placebo patients were switched to secukinumab., Results: At week 24, a higher, yet statistically non-significant (P = 0.136), proportion of patients in secukinumab vs placebo reported resolution of Achilles tendon enthesitis in affected foot (42.2% vs 31.4%; odds ratio [OR] = 1.63; 95% CI: 0.87, 3.08). Proportion of patients reporting resolution of enthesitis based on Leeds Enthesitis Index was higher with secukinumab vs placebo (33.3% vs 23.5%; OR = 1.65; 95% CI: 0.85, 3.25) at week 24. Mean change from baseline in heel pain at week 24 was higher in secukinumab patients vs placebo (-2.8 [3.0] vs -1.9 [2.7]). Greater improvements with secukinumab were observed in heel enthesopathy activity and global assessment of disease activity. Imaging evaluation by local reading confirmed heel enthesitis on MRI at screening for all patients. Based on central reading, 56% presented with bone marrow oedema and/or tendinitis; according to Heel Enthesitis MRI Scoring System (HEMRIS) post hoc analysis, 76% had signs of entheseal inflammation while 86% had entheseal inflammation and/or structural changes., Conclusion: A substantial proportion of patients showed no signs of inflammation on the centrally read MRIs despite a clinical diagnosis of heel enthesitis, thus highlighting that the discrepancy between the clinical and imaging assessments of enthesitis requires further investigation. Although ACHILLES did not meet the primary end point, the study reported clinically meaningful improvements in patient-related outcomes., Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02771210., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an oral selective tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor, deucravacitinib, in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA)., Methods: In this double-blind, phase II trial, 203 patients with PsA were randomised 1:1:1 to placebo, deucravacitinib 6 mg once a day or 12 mg once a day. The primary endpoint was American College of Rheumatology-20 (ACR-20) response at week 16., Results: ACR-20 response was significantly higher with deucravacitinib 6 mg once a day (52.9%, p=0.0134) and 12 mg once a day (62.7%, p = 0.0004) versus placebo (31.8%) at week 16. Both deucravacitinib doses resulted in significant improvements versus placebo (p≤0.05) in the multiplicity-controlled secondary endpoints of change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index and Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary score and in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index-75 response. Improvements were also seen in multiple exploratory endpoints with deucravacitinib treatment. The most common adverse events (AEs) (≥5%) in deucravacitinib-treated patients were nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, sinusitis, bronchitis, rash, headache and diarrhoea. There were no serious AEs and no occurrence of herpes zoster, opportunistic infections and major adverse cardiovascular events, or differences versus placebo in mean changes in laboratory parameters with deucravacitinib treatment., Conclusions: Treatment with the selective TYK2 inhibitor deucravacitinib was well tolerated and resulted in greater improvements than placebo in ACR-20, multiplicity-controlled secondary endpoints and other exploratory efficacy measures in patients with PsA. Larger trials over longer periods of time with deucravacitinib are warranted to confirm its safety profile and benefits in PsA., Trial Registration Number: NCT03881059., Competing Interests: Competing interests: PJM: research grants: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN Pharma and UCB; consulting and/or speaker fees: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN Pharma and UCB. AAD: consulting and/or advisory boards: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB; research grants: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. DvdH: consulting fees: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cyxone, Daiichi, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda and UCB Pharma; Director: Imaging Rheumatology. FB: research grants: Pfizer, Janssen, Chugai, Celgene and Roche; consultancies/speaker fees: Pfizer, AbbVie, Sanofi, Lilly, Novartis, Genzyme, Boehringer, Janssen, MSD, Celgene, Roche, Chugai, Bristol Myers Squibb and UCB Pharma. AJK: shareholder: Pfizer, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences and Novartis; paid consultant: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Flexion, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, Regeneron, SUN Pharma Advanced Research and Gilead Sciences; speakers bureau: Celgene, Merck, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Genzyme, Flexion and AbbVie. JN: research grants to foundation: AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Novartis, UCB, Pfizer, Gilead and Bristol Myers Squibb. SS, MN, SB: employees and shareholders of Bristol Myers Squibb. JK: employee of Bristol Myers Squibb at time of the study conduct., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Many patients with psoriatic arthritis do not reach minimal disease activity (MDA) on methotrexate alone. This phase 4 open-label study aimed to compare attainment of MDA following introduction of adalimumab with methotrexate escalation in patients with psoriatic arthritis who do not reach MDA after an initial methotrexate course (≤15 mg every week)., Methods: CONTROL was a phase 4, randomised, two-part, open-label study conducted in 14 countries and 46 sites. We recruited patients with confirmed active psoriatic arthritis, naive to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, with an inadequate response to 15 mg or less of methotrexate. In part 1, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either methotrexate 15 mg (oral or subcutaneous) every week with the addition of adalimumab 40 mg (subcutaneously) every other week (adalimumab plus methotrexate group) or methotrexate (oral or subcutaneous) escalation up to 25 mg every week (escalated methotrexate group). Randomisation was done using Interactive Response Technology and stratified by the duration of methotrexate treatment (≤3 months and >3 months). In this open-label study there was no masking; participants, people giving the interventions, those assessing outcomes, and those analysing the data were aware of group assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who reached MDA at 16 weeks. After 16 weeks (part 2), patients who reached MDA (responders) had their current therapy maintained or modified, wheras patients who did not reach MDA (non-responders) had their therapy escalated until 32 weeks. The primary endpoint in part 2 was the proportion of patients who reached MDA at 32 weeks, analysed in all patients who received one or more doses of study drug. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02814175., Findings: Between Aug 5, 2016, and March 19, 2020, 245 of 287 patients initially assessed were enrolled in the study (50% men and 50% women; 92% of patients were White). 123 patients were randomly assigned to receive adalimumab plus methotrexate and 122 patients to receive escalated methotrexate. All 245 patients were included in the primary analysis, and 227 completed part 1 and entered part 2. A significantly higher proportion of patients reached MDA at 16 weeks in the adalimumab plus methotrexate group (51 [41%] patients) compared with the escalated methotrexate group (16 [13%] patients; p<0·0001). Efficacy was generally maintained through 32 weeks for patients who reached MDA at 16 weeks, with 41 (80%) of 51 adalimumab responders and ten (67%) of 15 methotrexate responders maintaining MDA at 32 weeks. Of adalimumab non-responders, 17 (30%) of 57 patients reached MDA at 32 weeks after adalimumab escalation to every week dosing. Among methotrexate non-responders, 50 (55%) of 91 reached MDA after adalimumab introduction. In part 1, two patients in the adalimumab plus methotrexate group reported serious adverse events; and in part 2, one adalimumab responder, three adalimumab non-responders, and three methotrexate non-responders reported serious adverse events. No new safety signals were identified., Interpretation: Results from this novel treatment-strategy trial support the addition of adalimumab over escalating methotrexate in patients with psoriatic arthritis not reaching MDA after an initial methotrexate course. Safety results were consistent with the therapies' known safety profiles., Funding: AbbVie., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests LCC reports funding from a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) clinician scientist award; support from the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre; and reports serving on advisory boards, or consultancy, or speaker fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, Serac, and UCB. WT reports research grants from AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, and Lilly; and consultancy or speaker fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. M-AD reports serving on advisory boards, or consultancy, or speaker fees from AbbVie, BMS, Janssen, and Novartis. PR reports consulting fees from Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, and Pfizer; speakers bureau fees from Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, and Pfizer; and research grants from Janssen and Novartis. FB reports research grants from Celgene, Chugai, Janssen, Pfizer, and Roche; and personal fees from AbbVie, Boehringer, Celgene, Chugai, Genzyme, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi. ELM-B, XB, LC, and MK are full-time employees of AbbVie and might own stock or stock options. PGC reports serving as a consultant or on speaker bureaus for AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Flexion Therapeutics, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Pfizer. PM reports research grants and consultation or speaker honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, and UCB., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To assess whether tocilizumab treatment is associated with changes in depression symptoms in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during routine daily care., Methods: We retrospectively analysed data from a German non-interventional study (ARATA) of adult, tocilizumab-naïve RA patients who initiated subcutaneous tocilizumab and were followed for 52 weeks. The Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) was used to assess symptoms of depression and create baseline subgroups of no (BDI-II<14), mild (14-19), moderate (20-28), and severe (≥29) depression. Other key outcomes included Disease Activity Score-28 joints (DAS28), patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and adverse events. Mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) assessed the impact of DAS28 on BDI-II over time, and Pearson correlation analyses evaluated associations between changes from baseline., Results: Of 474/1155 ARATA patients who completed the BDI-II at baseline, 47.7% had evidence of depression: 18.4% mild, 17.7% moderate, and 11.6% severe. 229 patients (48.3%) completed the BDI-II at both baseline and week 52. Two-thirds of patients with moderate or severe depression at baseline improved to a milder or no depression subgroup at week 52 (44/65 [67.7%]). Improvements in disease activity and PROs were observed in all subgroups, but patients with depression had lower response and higher adverse events rates. We observed an association between DAS28 and BDI-II over time in MMRM analyses, but the Pearson correlation for change from baseline was weak (r=0.10)., Conclusions: Depression is common in patients receiving routine care for RA. Improvements in depressive symptoms in RA during tocilizumab therapy appear to be distinct from changes in disease activity.

Introduction: Improvements in both musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal manifestations are important treatment goals in psoriatic arthritis (PsA)., Objective: These post hoc analyses determined whether additional benefits related to various PsA domains are observed in patients simultaneously achieving 50% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR50) and 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI100), the primary endpoint of the SPIRIT-H2H study., Methods: Patients with active PsA and psoriasis in SPIRIT-H2H (N = 566) were categorised into two sets of four response groups irrespective of treatment allocation (approved dosages of ixekizumab or adalimumab): patients who simultaneously achieved ACR50 and PASI100 response, achieved ACR50 response only, achieved PASI100 response only, or did not achieve ACR50 or PASI100 response after 24 and 52 weeks of treatment. Patients achieving simultaneous ACR50 and PASI100 response were compared with the other patient response groups at the corresponding time point for efficacy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes., Results: Patients simultaneously achieving ACR50 and PASI100 responses at week 24 or 52 showed higher rates of ACR70 response, minimal disease activity, Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis ≤ 4, resolution of enthesitis and dactylitis, and HRQoL improvement at weeks 24 and 52, respectively, than the other corresponding response groups at both time points., Conclusion: High levels of disease control, such as those obtained with simultaneous achievement of ACR50 and PASI100 response, were linked to better outcomes across a wide range of endpoints that are important for patients with PsA. Patients meeting this combined endpoint showed more comprehensive and thus greater control of disease activity. Trial registration NCT03151551 Key Points • Treatment goals for patients with psoriatic arthritis emphasise the importance of improving both musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal manifestations of the disease. • A combined endpoint considering both these manifestations, achievement of at least 50% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria and 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index, was linked with achievement of a number of other endpoints relevant to psoriatic arthritis, including health-related quality of life that are important to patients with psoriatic arthritis. • Patients meeting the combined endpoint were more likely to achieve a disease state of remission, which is the stated aim of treatment for psoriasis., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Moderate to severe plaque psoriasis can be treated effectively with immunomodulating biologicals such as the interleukin-17A inhibitor secukinumab. In practice, however, questions often arise as to how to proceed in special situations, such as infections, comorbidity, pregnancy, or surgery., Objectives: To address frequent questions about the treatment of plaque psoriasis with secukinumab in a consensus document of German psoriasis experts that supplements current guidelines., Methods: In a virtual expert meeting in May 2020, practical aspects of the treatment of psoriasis were discussed based on the experience of the participants and on current literature. The results of this discussion were summarized in the present consensus document., Results: This article provides practical guidance on case history, documentation of previous therapies, severity of psoriasis, and comorbidities before starting therapy with secukinumab. For patients treated with secukinumab, the course of action in case of vaccinations, chronic or acute infections, surgical interventions, special manifestations of psoriasis, and comorbidities including history of cancer and autoimmune disorders is discussed. Questions regarding family planning and health policy regulations are also addressed., Discussion: The recommendations for the treatment of psoriasis with secukinumab summarized in this consensus document may contribute to achieve optimal therapy for patients and to improve their quality of life., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and ulcerative colitis. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily monotherapy after methotrexate withdrawal., Methods: OPAL Balance was an open-label, long-term extension study of tofacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis who participated in the OPAL Broaden and OPAL Beyond phase 3 studies. This 12-month, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, methotrexate withdrawal substudy (50 centres, 14 countries) included patients from OPAL Balance who completed tofacitinib treatment for 24 months or more (≥3 months' stable tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily) and were receiving methotrexate (7·5-20 mg/week). Patients were blindly randomised (1:1) using interactive response technology and received open-label tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily with either placebo (tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily plus placebo group) or continued methotrexate (tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily plus methotrexate group). Patients were masked to placebo or methotrexate, with identical capsules used. Coprimary endpoints were changes from substudy baseline in psoriatic arthritis disease activity score (PASDAS) and health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) at month 6 in all randomised patients with one or more substudy drug dose. Safety was assessed throughout. No specific statistical hypothesis (either superiority or non-inferiority) was tested. The study (OPAL Balance) is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01976364) and is complete., Findings: Between Oct 30, 2017, and May 20, 2019, 180 patients from OPAL Balance who were eligible for the substudy were randomly assigned to treatment (90 patients received tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily plus placebo and 89 patients assigned to tofacitinib plus methotrexate; one patient was not treated because of randomisation error). At month 6, least squares mean (LSM) changes in PASDAS were 0·23 (SE 0·08) for tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily plus placebo and 0·14 (0·08) for tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily plus methotrexate (treatment difference LSM 0·09 [95% CI -0·13 to 0·31]), and changes in HAQ-DI were 0·04 (0·03) and 0·02 (0·03), respectively (treatment difference 0·03 [-0·05 to 0·10]). Rates of adverse events, discontinuations because of adverse events, adverse events of special interest, and laboratory changes were generally similar between treatment groups, although liver enzyme elevations were more common with tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily plus methotrexate than tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily plus placebo. Flares of worsening symptoms was reported in one (1%) of 90 patients in the tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily plus placebo group (recorded as psoriatic arthropathy)., Interpretation: Some patients with psoriatic arthritis who are stable on tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily with background methotrexate might be able to discontinue methotrexate without clinically meaningful changes in disease activity and safety., Funding: Pfizer Inc., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The goal of this study was to evaluate the long-term impact of adalimumab therapy on work-related outcomes in employed patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Method: We utilized data from an observational cohort of German patients who initiated adalimumab treatment during routine clinical care. Analyses were based on employed patients (part-time or full-time) who continued adalimumab treatment for 24 months. Major outcomes were self-reported sick leave days in the previous 6 months, absenteeism, presenteeism, and total work productivity impairment as assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire and disease activity assessments. The normal number of sick leave days was based on data from the German Federal Statistical Office., Results: Of 783 patients, 72.3% were women, mean age was 47.9 years, and mean disease duration was 7.8 years. At baseline (before adalimumab initiation), 42.9% of patients had higher than normal sick leave days (> 5) in the previous 6 months. During 24 months of adalimumab treatment, 61% of patients with higher than normal sick leave days at baseline returned to normal sick leave values (≤ 5 days/6 months). Overall, mean sick leave days/6 months decreased from 14.8 days at baseline to 7.4 days at month 24. Improvements were observed in WPAI assessments and disease activity measures, although presenteeism levels remained high (32.2% at month 24)., Conclusions: Adalimumab treatment was associated with strong and sustained improvements in work-related outcomes in employed patients who continued on adalimumab for 24 months. Presenteeism appears to be the work outcome most resistant to improvement during RA treatment., Trial Registration: NCT01076205 Key Points • Long-term adalimumab therapy was associated with sustained improvements in work outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. • Despite improvements in sick leave days and work absenteeism, presenteeism (impairment while at work) remained relatively high.

Objective: The present study was undertaken to evaluate the probability of achieving the Clinical Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) treatment targets of remission or low disease activity (LDA) with apremilast based on disease activity categories and corresponding responses in arthritis and other domains of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) not included in the cDAPSA., Methods: Pooled analyses from the Psoriatic Arthritis Long-term Assessment of Clinical Efficacy studies 1, 2, and 3 were performed. Probability analyses assessing the likelihood of achieving cDAPSA treatment targets by week 52 were performed using multiple imputation for discontinuations and missing values. Longitudinal analyses were performed in patients grouped by cDAPSA category at week 52., Results: Among 494 patients in the probability analyses, 46.9% with moderate disease activity and 24.9% with high disease activity at baseline achieved treatment targets (remission or LDA) by week 52. For patients with moderate disease activity at baseline, small improvements (cDAPSA reductions ≥30%) by week 16 were associated with achieving targets. Patients achieving remission or LDA by week 16 had high probabilities of remaining at treatment targets at week 52. Of 375 patients with cDAPSA components available at week 52, achieving targets with apremilast was associated with continuous disease activity improvements and no or mild arthritis and other PsA manifestations., Conclusion: The probability of achieving treatment targets (remission or LDA) at week 52 was greater for patients with moderate versus high disease activity at baseline. At a mean level, partial improvements by week 16 were associated with achieving treatment targets. Patients receiving apremilast who achieved cDAPSA targets by week 52 also had no or mild arthritis or other PsA manifestations., (© 2020 The Authors. Arthritis Care & Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Psoriatic arthritis is a heterogeneous immune-mediated disease that usually involves skin and joints but can also affect entheses and extraarticular structures in the disease course. In addition, associated diseases must be considered when choosing the appropriate therapeutic strategy. Different recommendations for treatment of psoriatic arthritis are available for clinical use. The recommendations of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) are the two internationally accepted guidelines frequently used to assist therapeutic decisions in clinical practice. New targeted treatment options developed based on a better knowledge of critical pathogenic pathways, will enlarge our armamentarium for optimized pharmacotherapy of psoriatic arthritis and improve personalized patient care., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

The development programmes of different TNF-blocking agents in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) not only provided substantial evidence for the therapeutic benefits of the specific treatment options, but also enabled new insights into the differential treatment effects on distinct disease manifestations. For the first time, specific robust evidence for distinctive effects on different manifestations of PsA, as a distinct entity separate from rheumatoid arthritis (RA), has been generated in a standardized way. The clearest evidence was shown for an effect on peripheral arthritis (polyarticular) with ACR20 response rates from 45 up to 58% (vs. 9-24% for placebo), and an inhibition of radiographic progression demonstrated for the first time for a treatment principle in PsA. However, as PsA does not remain confined to the peripheral joints, it was necessary to address diverse patterns of PsA-subtypes in the outcome measurements of the anti-TNF trials. Accordingly, the results of the clinical studies on anti-TNF treatment also have demonstrated efficacy on enthesitis, dactylitis and skin psoriasis, either in sub analysis of results from phase III RCTs, or in additional prospective studies.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to use data from a non-interventional study of adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during routine clinical practice to evaluate the impact of prior treatment with biologics on the effectiveness of current therapy., Methods: Efficacy parameters were evaluated for all patients with values at baseline and month 12. Subgroup analyses were performed on patients with 0, 1, or ≥2 prior biologic agents. Key outcome measures included Disease Activity Score- 28 joints (DAS28) and Funktionsfragebogen Hannover (FFbH) functional ability score., Results: A total of 4700 RA adalimumab-treated patients were included in this analysis. Baseline disease activity increased with an increasing number of prior biologic agents and therapeutic response diminished. After 12 months of adalimumab therapy, DAS28 and FFbH scores showed improvements in all groups, but the group with 0 prior biologic agents had the best outcomes, while the group with ≥2 prior biologic agents had the worst. Clinical response (EULAR and DAS28-dcrit) and remission rates showed a similar pattern. Nevertheless, 44% to 67% of patients treated with ≥2 prior biologic agents achieved a clinical response. Multiple regression analyses identified prior biologic therapy as a significant negative predictor for response to therapy., Conclusions: Treatment with adalimumab leads to decreases in disease activity and improvements in function. Improvements are most pronounced in patients with 0 or 1 prior biologic agent, but a substantial proportion of patients treated with ≥2 prior biologic agents experience significant benefit from adalimumab therapy.

Objectives: Pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients with systemic sclerosis is a disease involving multiple organ systems. We investigated the differences in perceptions of how to measure PAH-SSc among cardiologists, pulmonologists and rheumatologists. We also examined how a Delphi exercise can improve agreement among these subspecialties., Methods: The outcome measures derived from the recent Delphi survey were used for a detailed analysis of the contribution of the various specialties contributing to it. We compared rheumatologists and cardiologist/pulmonologists with regards to preferences and ratings of various endpoints and the actual use of tools to measure these outcomes. We also examined the effects of the Delphi process among these groups., Results: We could show that the different expert groups each tended to contribute differently to the development of the core set of measures and that interactions in the Delphi process resulted in convergence of rankings. Despite agreement on the high importance of the domains in the Delphi, the use of tools within those domains was sometimes divergent and dependent on specialty., Conclusions: Based on these results, use of differing tools in the diagnosis and treatment of PAH-SSc can be anticipated. Further, the convergence of results provides evidence, for the first time, for the ability of various approaches in these disciplines to reach harmonious endpoints of care for PAHSSc patients. A collaborative, interdisciplinary approach is advantageous for PAH-SSc patients.