Search

Objectives: To verify whether the use of a small, oval-shaped patch limits the trend toward re-dilatation compared to endoventricular circular patch plasty and leads to different geometrical and functional results in surgical anterior restoration., Methods: Thirty-seven patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy after anterior myocardial infarction end-systolic volume index of > or =45 ml/m2, ejection fraction of < or =35%, and no combined mitral procedures, underwent surgical anterior ventricular restoration between January 2000 and April 2003: 18 patients (group 1) were operated on using the endoventricular circular patch plasty technique (mean patch area 9.6 cm2) and 19 patients (group 2) received a small, obliquely oriented, oval-shaped patch (mean patch area 6.2 cm2). Ten geometrical parameters were studied preoperatively and at least 6 and 12 months after surgery. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA, chi2, paired and unpaired Student's t-test, and binary logistic regression., Results: Group 1 showed a worsening over time in systolic and diastolic longitudinal length, end-diastolic volume (P < 0.001), end-diastolic volume index (P = 0.006), end-systolic volume (P = 0.005), and end-systolic volume index (P = 0.03). Group 2 showed an improvement in percentage of akinesia and wall motion score index (P < 0.001) and a worsening only in end-systolic diameter (P = 0.03) and end-diastolic volume (P = 0.04). At 12-month follow-up, ANOVA revealed that the oval patch positively influenced end-diastolic volume (P = 0.03), end-systolic volume (P = 0.03), and end-systolic volume index (P = 0.05), and group 2 had a significantly higher number of patients with an end-systolic volume index of <45 ml/m2 (P = 0.01)., Conclusion: The use of a small, narrow, obliquely oriented, oval patch may help to prevent adverse ventricular remodeling over time.

A simple technique utilized when replacement of the ascending aorta has to be associated with replacement of the aortic valve and the sole noncoronary sinus of Valsalva (vs. total root replacement) is presented. It offers the advantage to secure stable hemostasis in an area where surgical exposure may be difficult to achieve off-pump. For its easy reproducibility, this procedure might contribute to a more radical resection of diseased tissue thus limiting risk of further dilatation, rupture, and need for reoperation.

Background: This retrospective analysis assessed the hypothesis that clinical status on admission more than other variables related to surgical or post-operative management may influence in-hospital mortality after surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissection., Methods: Between January 1979 and April 2004, 311 patients, mean age of 59.5+/-13 years (range, 18 to 88 years), with acute type A aortic dissection were referred for surgery. Logistic regression analysis was applied to demographics, etiological, clinical, and surgical variables, to identify independent predictors of in hospital death., Results: In hospital mortality rate was 23%. Univariate analysis showed older age (p=0.03, OR1.02/yrs), cardiac tamponade (p=0.001; OR 2.43), hypotension (p=0.0001; OR 8), myocardial ischemia (p=0.005; OR 7), acute renal failure (p=0.0001; OR 4.16), limb ischemia (p=0.0002; OR 3.3), neurological deficits pre-op (p=0.0001; OR 8.5), and mesenteric ischemia (p=0.003) as independent predictors of in-hospital death. Multivariate analysis identified the following presenting variables as predictors of in-hospital death: hypotension (p=0.003; OR 7.4), myocardial ischemia (p=0.03; OR 5.8), mesenteric ischemia (p=0.009), acute renal failure (p=0.0001; OR 3.9), neurological deficits (p=0.0001; OR 7.7). In-hospital mortality for the group of patients presenting with at least one of the tested pre-operative complications (N=158; 51%) was 33% vs 12% (p=00001). No other variables emerged as significant for in-hospital death., Conclusion: In an era of standardized surgical technique, expeditious referral and intervention by lowering preoperative dissection-related complications and co-morbidities might represent the most efficacious tool to improve results.

The aim of this report is to offer a concise review of the current knowledge of type A aortic dissection aetiology and pathogenesis, to propose an updated diagnostic algorithm, to provide descriptions of current surgical and endovascular techniques for treatment, and to emphasise criteria for patient follow-up. Additional information regarding the institutional experience developed in a tertiary university hospital with a 25-year exposure to aortic dissection is also included to provide a comprehensive view of a clinical entity that still challenges physicians and surgeons.

Objective: Controversy still exists about averting expenditure of health care resources on the growing elderly population. This study evaluates clinical outcome of patients aged 75 years and older operated upon for acute type A aortic dissection., Methods: Between January 1990 and April 2004, of 247 patients undergoing emergency operation for acute type A aortic dissection at our Institution, 40 patients (16%) were aged 75 years and older (mean 78+/-3 years, range 75-88 years) and represent the study population. On admission, 9 (22.5%) had cardiogenic shock/hypotension, 20 (50%) cardiac tamponade, 14 (35%) kidney failure, 11 (27.5%) limb ischemia, 3 (7.5%) neurologic deficit, and 1 (2.5%) myocardial ischemia. Surgical procedures included isolated replacement of the ascending aorta in 34 patients (85%), associated with total root replacement in 5 (12.5%), and with aortic valve replacement in 1 (2.5%). Eleven patients (27.5%) underwent aortic arch replacement (hemiarch: n=8, 20%; total arch: n=3, 7.5%)., Results: In-hospital mortality was 30% (12 patients). Mortality tended to be higher (8/21, 38% vs 4/19, 21%; p=NS) for patients presenting with any one of the following complications: tamponade, shock, brain and/or myocardial, renal, limb malperfusion. Actuarial survival at 1, 5, and 7 years was 93+/-5%, 80+/-8%, and 80+/-8%, respectively, and freedom from reoperation 97+/-2%, 97+/-2%, and 97+/-2%, respectively. Actuarial event-free rates were 94+/-3%, 90+/-5%, and 90+/-5%. Seventy-four percent of survivors are in NYHA FC I, and quality of life test (RAND SF-36) revealed a generalized perception of independency and well-being, comparable to an age-matched population., Conclusions: Overall results for emergency repair of acute type A aortic dissection in the elderly justify intervention, particularly in uncomplicated cases. Expeditious referral and intervention by lowering pre-operative dissection-related complications and comorbidities might help to improve results. Survivors show functional status and quality of life similar to contemporary individuals.

Background: Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is proposed in the management of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Secondary PH related to a long-standing heart valve disease however may be refractory to iNO. Aim of this prospective study was to determine whether the combination of iNO plus dipyridamole (DP), a cyclic guanosine monophosphate-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor (PDE5), may enhance and/or prolong the response to iNO in adult patients with secondary valve-related PH undergoing cardiac surgery, and attenuate rebound events related to its discontinuation., Methods: Responses in 27 patients, 11 male, mean age 72+/-11 years, with PH due to mitral and/or aortic valve disease, were studied in the Intensive Care Unit after cardiac surgery, during sedation and stable hemodynamic conditions. The effect of isolated iNO administration (40 ppm), iNO combined with DP (0.2 mg/kg i.v.), and DP alone (1 mg/kg/24 h) on pulmonary vascular resistance, mean pulmonary artery pressure, cardiac index, mixed venous O2Sat%, and mean arterial pressure were determined., Results: All patients showed at least a 10% decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance vs. baseline after administration of iNO [responders]. Inhaled NO and the combination of iNO/DP produced a reduction of pulmonary vascular resistance and mean pulmonary artery pressure (p<0.05). Cardiac index improved with a significant difference between iNO and the association iNO/DP versus baseline (p<0.05). This significant hemodynamic improvement versus baseline was maintained during isolated DP administration (p<0.05), but not during isolated iNO discontinuation. Mixed venous oxygen saturation showed an overall improvement of 17% (p<0.05)., Conclusions: Inhaled NO and DP infusion might represent a valuable association in the management of PH secondary to a heart valve disease in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Their beneficial hemodynamic effects might be particularly valuable in the management of patients with associated right ventricular dysfunction.

Iatrogenic left and/or right coronary artery ostial stenosis after aortic valve replacement is a rare but life-threatening complication. Although usually related to trauma to the ostium/a during cannulation for administration of cardioplegia, it may be rarely due to direct obstruction by the prosthetic annular ring or stent. We report herein an alternative technique to manage this complication when due to the latter event, successfully utilized at our institution over the last eleven years.