51. Author response: Progressive neurodegeneration following spinal cord injury: Implications for clinical trials
- Author
-
Markus Hupp, Gabriel Ziegler, Armin Curt, Karl J. Friston, Daniel R. Altmann, Nikolaus Weiskopf, John Ashburner, Alan J. Thompson, Patrick Grabher, Patrick Freund, and University of Zurich
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Cord ,610 Medicine & health ,Disease ,03 medical and health sciences ,Myelopathy ,0302 clinical medicine ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,medicine ,Humans ,Cognitive Dysfunction ,Spinal cord injury ,Spinal Cord Injuries ,Mechanism (biology) ,business.industry ,Neurodegeneration ,Recovery of Function ,medicine.disease ,Spinal cord ,Clinical trial ,030104 developmental biology ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,2728 Neurology (clinical) ,10046 Balgrist University Hospital, Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Center ,Neurology (clinical) ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
We agree with Dr. Domingue's observation that the trajectory of recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI) is complex and difficult to predict. We should clarify that in the present study, we investigated the effects of traumatic SCI on neurodegeneration across the neuroaxis.1 However, we and others have shown that in cervical spondolytic myelopathy (i.e., nontraumatic SCI) remote tissue specific cord pathology is also evident.2,3 Surprisingly, the extent of neurodegeneration is similar to traumatic SCI, although these patients with nontraumatic SCI had only mild clinical symptoms.2 This suggests that, in a slow progressive disease (e.g., cervical spondolytic myelopathy), the CNS can compensate for neurodegenerative processes for much longer; however, with time, the competition between processes of reorganization and neurodegeneration is lost in favor of the latter. Nevertheless, the clinical viability of MRI-based structural measures for monitoring and predicting recovery after nontraumatic and traumatic SCI is feasible and will provide a tool to improve our understanding of the disease mechanism, which affects not only the spinal cord but also the brain after SCI.3–5 These new insights will enable us to better predict individual recovery trajectories and identify patients who could profit from further interventions to delay, or even prevent, further clinical deterioration.
- Published
- 2018