Search

Background: FGFR1 amplification occurs in ~ 15% of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancers. In these tumors, nuclear FGFR1 has been shown to interact with DNA, but its engagement in transcription regulation remains unclear. Thus, we investigated the mechanisms underpinning the genomic role of FGFR1 in ER+/FGFR1-amplified breast cancer. Methods: FGFR1-ChIP-Seq was performed in CAMA1 ER+/FGFR1-amplified human breast cancer cells to identify genomic distribution of FGFR1. IP with FLAG antibody followed by Mass Spectrometry (MS) was carried out on nuclear plus chromatin fractions of CAMA1 cells overexpressing 3XFLAG-FGFR1 to uncover the nuclear FGFR1 interactome. Results: FGFR1-ChIP-Seq detected 4408 peaks in CAMA1 cells cultured in estrogen-free conditions, with marked enrichment of GC-rich consensus motifs. 67% of peaks were enriched at promoter regions. ChIP-PCR confirmed FGFR1 binding to several genomic loci in ER+/FGFR1-amplified cell lines (CAMA1 and MDA-MB-134) and PDX (HCI-011). Further, MS uncovered RNA Polymerase II subunits among the top nuclear FGFR1 interacting proteins. FGFR1 mainly bound Pol II phosphorylated on Ser5 (Pol II S5P), a marker of transcription initiation, in CAMA1, MDA-MB-134 and HCI-011 cell extracts. Pol II S5P-ChIP-Seq revealed that 65% (2867/4408) of FGFR1 peaks were shared with Pol II S5P in CAMA1 cells. Also, ChIP-Seq revealed that 95% of FGFR1 peaks overlapped with both H3K4me3 and H3K27ac, markers of active transcription. Consistent with these results, RNA-Seq of CAMA1 cells showed that expression of FGFR1-bound genes was markedly higher than non FGFR1-bound genes (p1), whose expression is likely regulated by nuclear FGFR1. A high signature score correlated with resistance to letrozole (p Conclusions: These findings support a prominent role for FGFR1 in the transcriptional machinery of breast cancer cells. Whether this transcriptional action is causal to antiestrogen resistance in ER+/FGFR1-amplified breast cancer is currently under investigation. Citation Format: Alberto Servetto, Rahul Kollipara, Luigi Formisano, Kyung-min Lee, Albert Lin, Dhivya R. Sudhan, Ariella B. Hanker, Sumanta Chatterjee, Hiroaki Akamatsu, Arnaldo Marin, Saurabh Mendiratta, Ralf Kittler, Carlos L. Arteaga. FGFR1 associates with gene promoters and regulates transcription in ER+/FGFR1-amplified breast cancer: Implications for endocrine resistance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 1304.

In several tumors the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is frequently disrupted, an event that results in uncontrolled cell proliferation and tumor growth. Through the years, several compounds have been developed to inhibit the pathway at different steps: the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) seemed to be the most qualified target. However, this kinase has such a key role in cell survival that mechanisms of resistance are rapidly developed. Nevertheless, clinical results obtained with mTOR inhibitors in breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors and mantle cell lymphoma push oncologists to actively further develop these drugs, maybe by better selecting the population to which they are offered, through the research of predictive factors of responsiveness. In this review, we aim to describe mechanisms of resistance to mTOR inhibitors, from preclinical and clinical perspectives.

Activating mutations in HER2 (ERBB2) drive the growth of a subset of breast cancers. The HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) neratinib has shown clinical activity against cancers harboring HER2 activating mutations. Co-occurring HER2 and HER3 (ERBB3) mutations have been reported to co-occur in patients with breast cancer, suggesting the possibility of cooperativity of both oncogenes. Interrogation of the Project GENIE database revealed that gain-of-function missense mutations in HER2 and HER3 exhibit statistically significant co-occurence [q value=0.006 (breast cancer); q=1.01x10−26 (all cancer types)]. On the other hand, HER3 mutations were nearly absent in cancers harboring HER2 in-frame insertions and cancers with HER2 amplification. In breast cancer, co-occurring HER3 mutations were mutually exclusive with PIK3CA mutations, suggestive of potential functional redundancy. Sixty-eight unique breast cancers from cBioPortal, GENIE, and Foundation Medicine were found to harbor co-occurring mutations in HER2 and HER3, the most common of which were L755S, V777L, L869R/Q, and S310F, each with HER3E928G. Computational structural modeling suggested that the E928G substitution in HER3 enhances the interface energy between HER2 and HER3 kinase domains. This was confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation assays in HEK293 cells transfected with wild-type (WT) or mutant HER2 and HER3. This binding was further enhanced between HER3E928G and HER2 missense mutants. Further, structural modeling of L755S, V777L, and L869R/Q in HER2 revealed that each of these mutations increase HER2 kinase activation. Accordingly, each of these HER2 mutants, as well has HER2S310F in the extracellular domain, increased ligand-independent P-HER2 and P-HER3 in HEK293 cells. P-HER3 levels were the highest HEK293 in cells co-expressing HER2 and HER3 mutations. Similar results were observed in MCF10A breast epithelial cells stably expressing mutant HER2 and mutant HER3. Enhanced activation of the PI3K pathway (P-AKT and P-S6) was observed in cells expressing both mutations compared to cells expressing mutant HER2 with HER3WT or vice-versa. MCF10A HER2WT/HER3E982G cells did not form colonies in ligand-free 3D Matrigel assays, whereas cells expressing HER2L755S/HER3WT formed organized acini. In contrast, HER2L755S/HER3E928G acini were highly invasive. Addition of the HER3 ligand neuregulin (NRG) to HER2L755S/HER3WT cells phenocopied the effect of HER3E928G. Interestingly, MCF10A cells expressing the HER2Y772_A775 (YVMA) insertion together with HER3WT also formed invasive acini in the absence of NRG, suggesting that this HER2 insertion mutation is more transforming than HER2 missense mutations. Similar results were obtained with invasion assays using Matrigel-coated chambers. Finally, we examined the effects of HER2/HER3 co-mutations on sensitivity to HER2 inhibitors. Structural analysis was performed of the HER3/HER2 kinase domain complex docked with neratinib. HER3E928G, when bound to HER2, is located close to the neratinib-binding pocket of HER2 and was predicted to reduce HER2/neratinib binding affinity. Similarly, co-expression of HER3E928G reduced the ability of neratinib to inhibit P-HER3, P-AKT, P-S6, and growth of MCF10A cells expressing HER2/HER3 co-mutations. The PI3Kα inhibitor alpelisib restored neratinib sensitivity. Conclusions: Co-expression of mutant HER2 and mutant HER3 promotes ligand-independent HER2/HER association, HER3 phosphorylation, and cancer cell invasion via enhanced activation of the PI3K pathway; this enhanced signaling output is incompletely blocked by neratinib. Therefore, breast cancers expressing co-occurring HER2 and HER3 mutations may require the addition of a PI3Kα inhibitor to a HER2 TKI. Citation Format: Ariella B. Hanker, Harikrishna Sekar Jayanthan, Dan Ye, Chang-Ching Lin, Hiroaki Akamatsu, Jonathan H. Sheehan, James P. Koch, Dhivya R. Sudhan, Monica Red Brewer, Alberto Servetto, Jie He, Vincent A. Miller, Alshad S. Lalani, Jens Meiler, Carlos L. Arteaga. Co-occurring gain-of-function mutations in HER2 and HER3 modulate HER2/HER3 activation, breast cancer progression, and HER2 inhibitor sensitivity [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS6-04.

Although the 17q23 amplicon has been associated with luminal B breast cancer (BC) and high risk of recurrence, a specific gene or genes in this region that would be causal to endocrine resistance have not yet been uncovered. We performed whole transcriptome analysis on RNA extracted from 58 estrogen receptor (ER)+ BCs treated with neoadjuvant letrozole for median 7.2 months. PRR11 (Proline rich 11), located in 17q23, was upregulated in non-responding tumors as defined by relapse after a median follow up of 5 years and/or a preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) ≥4. Differential gene expression analysis between tumors expressing low vs high PRR11 mRNA showed that BC signatures associated with proliferation, IGF-1 and PI3K signaling were enriched in tumors with high PRR11 expression. Rate of PRR11 amplification is 15.2% in the Metastatic Breast Cancer project, but 9.5% and 9.4% in METABRIC and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), respectively. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis revealed an enrichment of hallmark gene sets associated with proliferation in PRR11-amplified ER+ BCs in METABRIC and TCGA. Integrated analysis of gene expression with on-treatment Ki67 levels from three independent studies with operable ER+ BCs treated with neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor (ACOSOG-Z1031, NCT00651976, Llombart-Cussac et al.) showed that PRR11 was the only gene in 17q23 with a significant correlation with a high Ki67 levels across all studies. PRR11 knockdown inhibited E2-independent growth of HCC1428 LTED (long-term estrogen deprived) and MCF7 LTED cells in culture and MCF7 xenografts. PRR11 siRNA also inhibited growth of fulvestrant-resistant and tamoxifen-resistant MCF7 cells. Conversely, PRR11 transduction induced MDA-MB-134VI cell growth under estrogen-depleted conditions. Using a PCR array with 84-cell cycle genes, we identified SKP2, CDKN1A, CCNB2, CCNA2, CKS2 and CCNB1 as genes downregulated by PRR11 knockdown. Except for SKP2 and CDKN1A, expression of all those genes was elevated in PRR11-amplifiedER+ BCs in TCGA and METABRIC. Suggesting a link to activation of PI3K signaling, we found the proline-rich motif of PRR11 associates with the SH3 domain of the p85 regulatory subunit of PI3K. We hypothesized that this association suppresses p85 homodimer formation, thus facilitating binding of PI3Kα (p110α)-p85 dimers to IRS1, retention of p110α at the plasma membrane and, hence, activation of PI3K/AKT. To test this, we co-transfected HEK293T cells with HA-p85 and FLAG-p85. Forced expression of PRR11 reduced HA-p85 and FLAG-p85 homodimers as shown by HA and FLAG pulldowns followed by FLAG and HA immunoblots, respectively. PRR11 overexpression enhanced insulin-stimulated association of IRS1 to p110α and activation of AKT. PRR11 knockdown reduced insulin/IGF-1/2-stimulated p-AKT. In METABRIC and TCGA, PRR11 amplification and PIK3CA mutations are exclusive of each other, suggesting these alterations would be functionally linked with the same pathway. Connectivity map analysis with the list of genes significantly overexpressed in ER+/PRR11-amplified BCs predicted PI3K inhibitors as perturbations that suppress such gene list. In the MGH/Sanger dataset, PRR11-amplified BC cell lines displayed significantly higher sensitivity to the pan-PI3K inhibitor pictilisib compared to cell lines without PRR11 amplification. Finally, inhibition of PI3Kα by siRNA or alpelisib abrogated E2-independent growth and insulin-stimulated growth of PRR11-transduced MDA-MB-134VI and MCF10A cells, respectively, suggesting p110α is required for the growth promoting effects of PRR11. These data suggest that 1) PRR11 is a mediator of resistance to antiestrogens via amplification of PI3K/AKT signaling, and 2) PI3Kα is a potential therapeutic target in ER+ BCs harboring PRR11 amplification. Citation Format: Kyung-min Lee, Angel Guerrero-Zotano, Ariella Hanker, Alberto Servetto, Dhivya Sudhan, Luigi Formisano, Valerie Jansen, Paula González-Ericsson, Melinda Sanders, Thomas Stricker, Lewis Cantley, Carlos Arteaga. A neoadjuvant trial with letrozole identifies PRR11 in the 17q23 amplicon as a mechanism of resistance to endocrine therapy in ER-positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS6-06.

Background: FGFR1 amplification occurs in about 15% of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancers and is associated with resistance to endocrine therapy. In these tumors, nuclear FGFR1 has been shown to interact with ERα and alter gene expression through binding to chromatin. However, the mechanisms underpinning nuclear FGFR1-mediated gene transcription remain unclear. Thus, we sought to elucidate mechanisms to explain the genomic role of FGFR1 in ER+/FGFR1-amplified breast cancer.Results: FGFR1 ChIP-Seq detected 4408 DNA binding sites in CAMA1 ER+/FGFR1-amplified breast cancer cells cultured in estrogen-free conditions; 67% of these sites were enriched at promoter regions, suggesting a role of FGFR1 in gene transcription regulation. ChIP-qPCR assay confirmed FGFR1 binding to promoter regions of genes such as CCND1, MYC, VEGFA, JUNB and SMAD5 in both CAMA1 and MDA-MB-134 ER+/FGFR1-amplified cells and also in an ER+/FGFR1-amplified patient derived xenograft (HCI-011). RNA-Seq of CAMA1 cells revealed that expression of FGFR1-bound genes was substantially higher than non FGFR1-bound genes (p0.25), representing those whose expression is likely regulated by FGFR1. This high signature score was associated with worse disease free survival (DFS; 263.7 months vs not reached; HR=1.72, CI 1.39-2.12; p Citation Format: Alberto Servetto, Rahul Kollipara, Luigi Formisano, Kyung-min Lee, Dhivya R Sudhan, Ariella B Hanker, Sumanta Chatterjee, Albert Lin, Saurabh Mendiratta, Nicholas James, Ralf Kittler, Carlos L Arteaga. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 associates with promoters genome-wide and regulates gene transcription in ER+/FGFR1-amplified breast cancer: Implications for endocrine resistance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD7-04.

Background: Recently, immune check-point inhibitors have shown efficacy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Since Hedgehog (Hh) signalling mediates crosstalk between breast cancer cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells, we investigated the mechanisms by which Hh can modulate PDL1 expression and the tumor-immune microenvironment. Methods: TNBC tumors from untreated patients were subjects to PDL1 and Gli1 expression analysis by IHC. The correlation of Hh pathway activation and PDL1 expression was assessed in TNBC cells treated with the SMO-inhibitor NVP-LDE225. The main aim was to study the PDL1/Gli1 cross-talk. Results: The expression of PDL1 and Gli1, the major indicator for the canonical Hh signaling activation, were assessed by IHC in a tissue microarray (TMA) of TNBC samples from 237 untreated patients. In 203/237 cases we could analyze both PDL1 and Gli1 protein expression. A significant correlation between PDL1 and Gli1 expression was found. Indeed, of 77/203 (38%) PDL1 positive tumors 42/77 (54%) expressed Gli1. In order to explore correlations between other Hh pathway members and PDL1 in TNBCs, we interrogated the open-access database TCGA; PDL1 positive TNBCs showed high levels of SMO and PTCH1, Hh pathway receptors (Q-value 0.018 and 0.010). To better understand the link between Hh pathway and PDL1, we selected a panel of TNBC cell lines; the pharmacological Hh pathway inhibition led to a reduction of PDL1 protein and mRNA. On the other hand, engineered cells harbouring Gli1 overexpression showed higher levels of PDL1. Therefore, we hypothesized that Hh pathway could be involved in the PDL1 transcriptional modulation. To address this issue, we performed a luciferase reporter assay and a ChIP analysis following by PCR amplification of the PDL1 gene promoter. We found that Gli1 binds the PDL1 promoter, indicating that Gli1 transcriptionally enhances PDL1 expression. Gli1 expression was evaluated also in 4T1 cells, a TNBC murine model; furthermore, in 4T1 cells PDL1 protein expression was inhibited by NVP-LDE225. In vivo experiment will be performed in Balb/C mice orthotopically xenografted with 4T1 cells to confirm the role of Hh pathway to modulate the PDL1 expression and the tumor microenviroment in vivo. Conclusions: Our results suggest that Hh pathway has a crucial role in cancer immune evasion trough PDL-1 modulation. Due to their ability to target both tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment, Hh inhibitors could represent promising therapeutics to be clinically investigated in Gli1 overexpressing TNBC patients. Citation Format: Pietro De Placido, Concetta Di Mauro, Daniela Esposito, Ada Pesapane, Stefania Belli, Fabiana Napolitano, Antonio Santaniello, Priscilla Cascetta, Annachiara Carratù, Eleonora Mozzillo, Roberta Marciano, Alberto Servetto, Roberto Bianco, Luigi Formisano. Hedgehog pathway is involved in cancer immune surveillance through PDL1 modulation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-04-17.

Purpose: This study aimed to identify biomarkers of resistance to endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) breast cancers treated with prolonged neoadjuvant letrozole.Experimental Design: We performed targeted DNA and RNA sequencing in 68 ER+ breast cancers from patients treated with preoperative letrozole (median, 7 months).Results: Twenty-four tumors (35%) exhibited a PEPI score ≥4 and/or recurred after a median of 58 months and were considered endocrine resistant. Integration of the 47 most upregulated genes (log FC > 1, FDR < 0.03) in letrozole-resistant tumors with transcription-binding data showed significant overlap with 20 E2F4-regulated genes (P = 2.56E−15). In patients treated with the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib before surgery, treatment significantly decreased expression of 24 of the 47 most upregulated genes in letrozole-resistant tumors, including 18 of the 20 E2F4 target genes. In long-term estrogen-deprived ER+ breast cancer cells, palbociclib also downregulated all 20 E2F4 target genes and P-RB levels, whereas the ER downregulator fulvestrant or paclitaxel only partially suppressed expression of this set of genes and had no effect on P-RB. Finally, an E2F4 activation signature was strongly associated with resistance to aromatase inhibitors in the ACOSOG Z1031B neoadjuvant trial and with an increased risk of relapse in adjuvant-treated ER+ tumors in METABRIC.Conclusions: In tumors resistant to prolonged neoadjuvant letrozole, we identified a gene expression signature of E2F4 target activation. CDK4/6 inhibition suppressed E2F4 target gene expression in estrogen-deprived ER+ breast cancer cells and in patients' ER+ tumors, suggesting a potential benefit of adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with ER+ breast cancer who fail to respond to preoperative estrogen deprivation. Clin Cancer Res; 24(11); 2517–29. ©2018 AACR.

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is a GPI-anchored cell membrane receptor that focuses urokinase (uPA) proteolytic activity on the cell surface. Its expression is increased in many human cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC), and correlates with a poor prognosis and early invasion and metastasis. uPAR is able to control, through a cross-talk with tyrosine kinase receptors, the shift between tumor dormancy and proliferation, that usually precedes metastasis formation. Therefore, we investigated the role of uPAR expression in RAS mutated NSCLC and CRC cells. In this study we provided evidence, for the first time, that RAS mutational condition is functionally correlated to uPAR overexpression in NSCLC and CRC cancer cell lines and patient-derived tissue samples. Moreover, oncogenic features related to uPAR overexpression in RAS mutated NSCLC and CRC, such as adhesion, migration and metastatic process may be targeted, in vitro and in vivo, by new anti-uPAR small molecules, specific inhibitors of uPAR-vitronectin interaction. Therefore, anti-uPAR drugs could represent an effective pharmacological strategy for NSCLC and CRC patients carrying RAS mutations.

Several evidences suggest a marked angiogenic dependency in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) tumorigenesis and a potential sensitivity to anti-angiogenic agents. Herein, the putative role of Hedgehog (Hh) pathway in regulating TNBC-dependent angiogenesis was investigated. Background: Several evidences suggest a marked angiogenic dependency in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) tumorigenesis and a potential sensitivity to anti-angiogenic agents. Herein, the putative role of Hedgehog (Hh) pathway in regulating TNBC-dependent angiogenesis was investigated.Methods: Expression and regulation of the Hh pathway transcription factor glioma-associated oncogene homolog1 protein (GLI1) were studied on the endothelial compartment and on TNBC-initiated angiogenesis. To evaluate the translational relevance of our findings, the combination of paclitaxel with the Smo inhibitor NVP-LDE225 was tested in TNBC xenografted mice.Results: Tissue microarray analysis on 200 TNBC patients showed GLI1 overexpression paired with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) expression. In vitro, Hh pathway promotes TNBC progression in an autocrine manner, regulating the VEGF/VEGFR2 loop on cancer cell surface, and in a paracrine manner, orchestrating tumour vascularisation. These effects were counteracted by Smo pharmacological inhibition. In TNBC xenografted mice, scheduling NVP-LDE225 rather than bevacizumab provided a better sustained inhibition of TNBC cells proliferation and endothelial cells organisation.Conclusions: This study identifies the Hh pathway as one of the main regulators of tumour angiogenesis in TNBC, thus suggesting Hh inhibition as a potential new anti-angiogenic therapeutic option to be clinically investigated in GLI1 overexpressing TNBC patients.

Background Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive tumor originating in the epithelium of the bile duct, often associated with distant dissemination. The prognosis is poor and treatment is challenging due to low response rate to standard chemotherapy and lack of targeted therapies. Case presentation Here we report the case of a 74-year-old white woman affected by intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with metastatic involvement of spleen, lung, peritoneum, and intra-abdominal lymph nodes. As first-line chemotherapy, she was given cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy. The treatment was well tolerated with the exception of grade 1 constipation and a single episode of grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurring after the fourth course. After the first three courses of chemotherapy a computed tomography scan evaluation demonstrated no change; her CA19-9 levels were slightly decreased. However, after the sixth course of chemotherapy a computed tomography scan revealed a dimensional enlargement of the lung metastases; her CA19-9 levels increased. She was then treated with gemcitabine alone. After 2 months of gemcitabine monotherapy a significant regression of lung and spleen metastases, as well a CA19-9 level reduction, occurred. Eight months after the start of gemcitabine monotherapy no signs of progression were reported. Conclusions Treatment of metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with gemcitabine as maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy could be continued until clear evidence of disease progression since delayed responses are possible.

Background:Cetuximab is the only targeted agent approved for the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC), but low response rates and disease progression are frequently reported. As the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways have an important role in the pathogenesis of HNSCC, we investigated their involvement in cetuximab resistance.Methods:Different human squamous cancer cell lines sensitive or resistant to cetuximab were tested for the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor PF-05212384 (PKI-587), alone and in combination, both in vitro and in vivo.Results:Treatment with PKI-587 enhances sensitivity to cetuximab in vitro, even in the condition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) resistance. The combination of the two drugs inhibits cells survival, impairs the activation of signalling pathways and induces apoptosis. Interestingly, although significant inhibition of proliferation is observed in all cell lines treated with PKI-587 in combination with cetuximab, activation of apoptosis is evident in sensitive but not in resistant cell lines, in which autophagy is pre-eminent. In nude mice xenografted with resistant Kyse30 cells, the combined treatment significantly reduces tumour growth and prolongs mice survival.Conclusions:Phosphoinositide 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition has an important role in the rescue of cetuximab resistance. Different mechanisms of cell death are induced by combined treatment depending on basal anti-EGFR responsiveness. © 2014 Cancer Research UK.

Background: The HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) neratinib has exhibited clinical activity in patients with metastatic HER2-mutant cancers. However, responses are heterogeneous across tumor types and not generally prolonged, suggesting mechanisms of de novo and acquired drug resistance. Methods: Neratinib-resistant 5637 (HER2S310F) bladder cancer and OVCAR8 (HER2G776V) ovarian cancer cells were developed after gradual dose escalation. Candidate pathways associated with drug resistance identified by RNA sequencing were validated in a panel of HER2-mutant cell lines and in the SUMMIT basket trial in patients with HER2-mutant cancers. Results: Neratinib-resistant 5637 and OVCAR8 cells were cross-resistant to the HER2 TKIs afatinib and lapatinib. Immunoblot analysis showed that neratinib was still able to suppress HER2, EGFR and HER3 phosphorylation. Gene Set Enrichment and Connectivity Map analyses of RNA-seq data suggested mTORC1 signaling as a druggable pathway driving neratinib resistance. Immunoblot analysis of drug-resistant cells revealed a striking increase in S6K and S6 phosphorylation compared to parental cells. P-S6 levels and viability of drug resistant cells/tumors were ablated upon combining neratinib with the TORC1i everolimus both in vitro and in vivo. Similar results were obtained in cells transfected with Raptor or Rheb siRNAs. Further, neratinib resistance was induced by TSC2 knockdown and resultant TORC1 hyperactivation in parental 5637, OVCAR8, and MCF7 cells expressing L755S or V777L HER2 mutations. RNA-seq also revealed significant enrichment of RAS pathway in neratinib resistant cells which was confirmed by RAS-GTP pulldown. Pharmacological inhibition of RAS signaling using the PI3Ki buparlisib and the MEKi trametinib, or genetic suppression using H-, K-, and N-RAS isoform-specific siRNAs, ablated P-S6 and viability of neratinib resistant cells, suggesting RAS is causally associated with TORC1 hyperactivity and drug resistance. Further, intrinsically neratinib-resistant HER2-mutant cell lines with KRAS or PIK3CA co-mutations [DV90 (ERBB2V842I, KRASG13D), SNUC2A (ERBB2R678Q, KRASG12D, TSC2P1521T), MCF7 (HER2L755S/V777L, PIK3CAH1047R)] were sensitized to neratinib upon the addition of everolimus. Finally, DNA sequencing of tumors (MSK-IMPACT panel; 410 genes) from 141 patients enrolled in the SUMMIT trial showed enrichment of somatic alterations associated with aberrant activation of TORC1 pathway (KRAS, NRAS, NF1, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, AKT1/2, PTEN) in patients exhibiting primary resistance to neratinib. Conclusions: These data suggest that hyperactivation of TORC1 pathway promotes de novo and acquired resistance to neratinib across histologically distinct HER2-mutant cancers. Thus, we propose the combination of neratinib with TORC1 inhibitors is worthy of investigation in patients with HER2-mutant cancers. Citation Format: Dhivya R. Sudhan, Angel Guerrero-Zotano, Helen Won, Paula Gonzales Ericsson, Qi Liu, Teresa Dugger, James Koch, Alison Schram, Alberto Servetto, Richard Cutler, Alshad Lalani, Richard Bryce, Alan Auerbach, Ariella Hanker, Carlos L. Arteaga. Hyperactivation of mTORC1 drives acquired resistance to the pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor neratinib in HER2-mutant cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 329.

Background: FGFR1 amplification occurs in about 15% of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancers and is associated with resistance to endocrine therapy. In these tumors, nuclear FGFR1 has been shown to interact with ERα. In addition, FGFR1 has been demonstrated to alter gene expression through binding to chromatin. However, the mechanisms underpinning nuclear FGFR1-mediated gene transcription remain unclear. Thus, we sought to elucidate the genomic and non-genomic role of FGFR1 in ER+/FGFR1-amplified breast cancer. Methods: FGFR1 ChIP-Seq and ERα ChIP-Seq were performed on CAMA1 ER+/FGFR1-amplified breast cancer cells. ChIP-qPCR was employed to quantify DNA binding events. For ChIP-Seq, immunoblot, RT-qPCR, Estrogen Response Element (ERE) luciferase reporter and growth assays, CAMA1 cells were plated in estrogen-free media for 24 hours and then stimulated with 100 ng/ml FGF3 or 1 nM β-Estradiol. Results: FGFR1 ChIP-Seq detected 2211 DNA binding sites in CAMA1 cells cultured in estrogen-free conditions. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) revealed that the TNFα signaling via NF-KB, MYC targets, G2M checkpoints, ERE early and ERE late response genes (all FDR Conclusions: These findings suggest a FGFR1 kinase-dependent role on ER-mediated transcription in ER+/FGFR1-amplified breast cancer cells. We are currently performing mass spectrometry analysis to identify binding partners of nuclear FGFR1 that mediate its transcriptional function. Citation Format: Alberto Servetto, Luigi Formisano, Rahul Kollipara, Dhivya R. Sudhan, Kyung-min Lee, Sumanta Chatterjee, Ariella B. Hanker, Saurabh Mendiratta, Ralf Kittler, Carlos L. Arteaga. FGFR1 signaling modulates estrogen-independent ER transcriptional activity in ER+/FGFR1-amplified breast cancer cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4402.

Background The EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib are first-line therapy for NSCLCs harbouring EGFR-activating mutations. The intrinsic and acquired resistance to these agents is a relevant clinical issue. Although Src tyrosine kinase has been involved in such resistance in preclinical models, clinical development of these agents has been so far limited. Methods We used a panel of human NSCLC cell lines: PC9 and HCC827 (EGFR-activating mutation; highly sensitive to erlotinib), Calu3 (EGFR/Ras wild-type, wt; moderately sensitive), Calu3-ER (with acquired resistance), H1299 and A549 (Ras mutant; resistant), H1975 (EGFR T790M mutant; resistant). In these models, we tested three different Src inhibitors (saracatinib, dasatinib, and bosutinib), both in vitro and in vivo. Findings NSCLC cell lines showed different activation of EGFR-dependent and Src-dependent pathways and variable sensitivity to Src inhibitors. A kinase assay demonstrated that all the compounds are able to directly inhibit EGFR tyrosine kinase variants. In cell lysates only saracatinib and bosutinib efficiently reduced EGFR activation, while dasatinib was the more effective agent in inhibiting Src tyrosine kinase. Consistently, in EGFR-activating mutant, erlotinib sensitive cells, saracatinib and bosutinib showed anti-proliferative effects related to simultaneous EGFR/Src inhibition. In EGFR wt/Ras mutant cells Src inhibition by dasatinib interfered with cell proliferation and signal transduction. Since Src inhibitors had only moderate effects as single agents we tested the combination of saracatinib with EGFR inhibitors (erlotinib or cetuximab) in EGFR-addicted cells, and of dasatanib with MEK inhibitors (selumetinib) in Ras mutant, erlotinib resistant models. These combinations were effective both in vitro and in nude mice, inhibiting tumour growth, prolonging mice survival, and interfering with signal transduction. Importantly, the combination of saracatanib and cetuximab was effective also in the erlotinib resistant, EGFR T790M mutant model. Interpretation Src inhibitors may act with different mechanisms in NSCLC cell lines, depending on EGFR/Ras mutational profile. Integration of anti-Src agents with EGFR or MEK inhibitors could represent effective therapeutic options for different cohorts of NSCLC patients.

Aim: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a group of tumors that do not express HER2, estrogen and progesterone receptors. Due to reduced response to conventional antitumor therapies and poor prognosis, new targeted agents are needed for such aggressive sub-type of breast cancer. Multiple lines of evidence support the idea that deregulation of Hedgehog (Hh) signaling has a role in the pathogenesis of breast cancer, in part through the promotion of epithelial-stromal interactions. Therefore, the inhibition of the Hh pathway has been proposed as an interesting therapeutic approach Methods: The main objective of this study is to investigate the role of Hh signaling pathway in TNBC. To this aim, we used a panel of human breast cancer cell lines, including five cancer cells lines positive for ER, PR and HER2 expression (nTNBC) and five Triple Negative Breast Cancer cell lines (TNBC). The effects induced by the Smo-inhibitor NVP-LDE225 on proliferation, angiogenesis and signal transduction of breast cancer cells were investigated Results: GLI1, one of the major transcription factors induced by Hh signaling activation, is more expressed in TNBC than in nTNBC cell lines. Consistently, NVP-LDE225 treatment induced a more pronounced inhibitory effect on TNBC, in terms of tumor growth: while nTNBC cells display an IC50 of∼5mM, TNBC cell lines are more sensitive, with an average IC50 of∼2mM. In addition, Hh inhibition caused a robust impairment of TNBC cells invasion capabilities. These effects are coupled with a strong inhibition of VEGFA production by both tumor and stromal cells (human fibroblasts and HUVECs). Accordingly, NVP-LDE225 treatment interfered with HUVEC capillary tube formation, an effect even more evident than that observed with bevacizumab, the only targeted agent approved to date for TNBC patients Conclusions: Our results suggest that Hh has a specific role in breast epithelial-stromal interactions by regulation of angiogenesis. An orthotopic in vivo experiment in nude mice xenografted with TNBC cells, testing the combination of NVP-LDE225 with bevacizumab, is ongoing Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Background: Multiple lines of evidence support that the Hedgehog (Hh) signalling has a role in the maintenance and progression of different human cancers. Therefore, inhibition of the Hh pathway represents a valid anticancer therapeutic approach for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. NVP-LDE225 is a Smoothened (Smo) antagonist that induces dose-related inhibition of Hh and Smo-dependent tumour growth. Methods: We assayed the effects of NVP-LDE225 alone or in combination with everolimus or sunitinib on the growth and invasion of human RCC models both in vitro and in vivo. To this aim, we used a panel of human RCC models, comprising cells with acquired resistance to sunitinib - a multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved as a first-line treatment for RCC. Results: NVP-LDE225 cooperated with either everolimus or sunitinib to inhibit proliferation, migration, and invasion of RCC cells even in sunitinib-resistant (SuR) cells. Some major transducers involved in tumour cell motility, including paxillin, were also efficiently inhibited by the combination therapy, as demonstrated by western blot and confocal microscopy assays. Moreover, these combined treatments inhibited tumour growth and increased animal survival in nude mice xenografted with SuR RCC cells. Finally, lung micrometastasis formation was reduced when mice were treated with NVP-LDE225 plus everolimus or sunitinib, as evidenced by artificial metastatic assays. Conclusions: Hedgehog inhibition by NVP-LDE225 plus sunitinib or everolimus bolsters antitumour activity by interfering with tumour growth and metastatic spread, even in SuR cells. Thus, this new evidence puts forward a new promising therapeutic approach for RCC patients.

Aim: The EGFR TKIs gefitinib and erlotinib are the first-line therapy for NSCLCs harboring EGFR-activating mutations. The intrinsic resistance to these agents and the onset of acquired resistance in the responders is a relevant clinical issue and the aim of this work is to test the efficacy of three different Src inhibitors in these models of resistance. Methods: We used a panel of human NSCLC cell lines with different EGFR/Ras mutational profile and erlotinib sensitivity: PC9 and HCC827 (EGFR-activating mutation, highly sensitive), Calu3 (EGFR/Ras wt; moderately sensitive), Calu3-ER (with acquired resistance), H1299 and A549 (Ras mutant; resistant), H1975 (EGFR T790M mutant; resistant). In these models, we tested three different Src inhibitors (saracatinib, dasatinib and bosutinib), both in vitro and in vivo Results: NSCLC cell lines showed different activation of EGFR- and Src-dependent pathways and variable sensitivity to Src inhibitors. A kinase assay demonstrated that all the compounds are able to directly inhibit not only Src, but also EGFR TK variants. However, in cell lysates only saracatinib and bosutinib efficiently reduced EGFR activation, while dasatinib was the more effective agent in inhibiting Src TK. In EGFR-activating mutant, erlotinib sensitive cells, saracatinib and bosutinib showed anti-proliferative effects related to simultaneous EGFR/Src inhibition. In EGFR wt/Ras mutant cells Src inhibition by dasatinib interfered with cell proliferation and signal transduction. Since Src inhibitors had only moderate effects as single agents, both in vitro and in vivo, we tested the combination of saracatinib with EGFR inhibitors (erlotinib or cetuximab) in EGFR-addicted cells, and of dasatanib with MEK inhibitors (selumetinib) in Ras mutant, erlotinib resistant models. These combinations were effective both in vitro and in vivo, inhibiting tumor growth, prolonging mice survival and interfering with signal transduction. Importantly, the combination of saracatanib and cetuximab was effective also in the erlotinib resistant, EGFR T790M mutant model. Conclusions: Src inhibitors may act with different mechanisms in NSCLC cell lines, depending on EGFR/Ras mutational profile. Integration of anti-Src agents with EGFR or MEK inhibitors could represent effective therapeutic options for different cohorts of NSCLC patients. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Inhibition of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a promising treatment strategy for several cancer types. Rapamycin derivatives such as everolimus are allosteric mTOR inhibitors acting through interaction with the intracellular immunophilin FKBP12, a prolyl isomerase with different cellular functions. Although mTOR inhibitors have significantly improved survival of different cancer patients, resistance and lack of predictive factors of response remain unsolved issues. To elucidate the mechanisms of resistance to everolimus, we evaluated Met activation in everolimus-sensitive/resistant human cancer cells, in vitro and in vivo. Biochemical and computational analyses were performed. Everolimus-resistant cells were xenografted into mice (10/group) and studied for their response to everolimus and Met inhibitors. The statistical significance of the in vitro results was evaluated by Student's t test. Everolimus reduced Met phosphorylation in everolimus-sensitive cells. This event was mediated by the formation of a Met-FKBP12 complex, which in turn is disrupted by everolimus. Aberrant Met activation in everolimus-resistant cells and overexpression of wild-type/mutant Met caused everolimus resistance. Pharmacological inhibition and RNA silencing of Met are effective in condition of everolimus resistance (P

Resistance to the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) gefitinib and erlotinib, often related to Ras or secondary EGFR mutations, is a relevant clinical issue in Non- Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Although Src TK has been involved in such resistance, clinical development of its inhibitors has been so far limited. To better define the molecular targets of the Src TKIs saracatinib, dasatinib and bosutinib, we used a variety of in vitro/in vivo studies. Kinase assays supported by docking analysis demonstrated that all the compounds directly inhibit EGFR TK variants. However, in live cells only saracatinib efficiently reduced EGFR activation, while dasatinib was the most effective agent in inhibiting Src TK. Consistently, a pronounced anti-proliferative effect was achieved with saracatinib, in EGFR mutant cells, or with dasatinib, in wt EGFR/Ras mutant cells, poorly dependent on EGFR and erlotinib-resistant. We then identified the most effective drug combinations to overcome resistance to EGFR inhibitors, both in vitro and in nude mice: in T790M EGFR erlotinib-resistant cells, saracatinib with the anti-EGFR mAb cetuximab; in Ras mutant erlotinib-resistant models, dasatinib with the MEK inhibitor selumetinib. Src inhibitors may act with different mechanisms in NSCLCs, depending on EGFR/Ras mutational profile, and may be integrated with EGFR or MEK inhibitors for different cohorts of NSCLCs.