Search

Purpose We aimed to develop a predictive tool for anastomotic leakage (AL) following colon cancer surgery by combining a clinical early warning score (EWS) with the C-reactive protein (CRP) level. Methods The records of 1,855 patients who underwent colon cancer surgery at the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust between January 2013 and December 2018, with or without AL, were retrospectively reviewed. EWS and CRP levels were assessed daily from the first postoperative day until discharge. AL was defined as an anastomotic defect observed at reoperation, the presence of feculent fluid in a pelvic drain, or evidence of AL on computed tomography. The tool incorporated postoperative EWS and CRP levels for the accurate early detection of AL. Results From postoperative days 3 to 7, the mean CRP level exceeded 200 mg/L in patients with AL and was under 200 mg/L in those without AL (P

Abstract Following bowel surgery, infectious complications, including anastomotic leak (AL), remain major sources of morbidity and mortality. Bowel preparation is often administered with the assumption that gut decontamination reduces post-surgical complications. In this study, we tested this hypothesis using a murine model of colon surgery. The mice were fed either regular chow or a high-fat, high-sugar Western diet. The day before surgery, the mice received one of four interventions: water (control), mechanical bowel preparation (MBP), oral antibiotics (OA), or both MBP and OA. We found no differences in the rates of AL among the experimental groups, and diet did not appear to affect the outcomes. Exploratory analyses showed changes in the gut microbiome consistent with the different treatments, but investigations of fecal short-chain fatty acids and RNA sequencing of colonic tissue did not reveal specific effects of the treatments or the presence of AL. However, we did identify bacterial genera that may be causally associated with AL and developed a predictive index from stool samples as a marker for the presence of AL. Future research is needed to identify and validate a microbial predictive tool and to uncover the microbial-driven mechanisms that lead to AL.

Background: The objective of this study was to compare the anastomotic leak rates between powered and manual circular staplers in elective left-sided colorectal resections. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of elective left-sided colorectal resections before and after implementation of a powered circular stapler at a tertiary care center was conducted. The manual stapler group consisted of consecutive resections performed between January 2016 to December 2016 and the powered stapler group, between September 2021 and December 2022. Primary outcome was 30-day anastomotic leak rate. A chi-squared analysis was performed to compare anastomotic leak rates. Factors associated with anastomotic leak were examined. Results: Two-hundred forty-seven patients were included: 154 in the manual stapler group and 93 in the powered stapler group. Mean (SD) age was 60 (15) years old, 37.7% were female and 72.9% of resections were performed for malignancy. Both groups had similar patient characteristics and surgical technique. Overall leak rate was 2.0% in the manual stapler group and 10.8% in the powered stapler group. The powered staplers were found to have 6.06 times the odds of leak compared to manual staplers (95% CI, 1.62–22.65; p = 0.01). None of the other factors were found to be associated with anastomotic leak. Conclusions: Patients who had left-sided colorectal anastomosis had higher anastomotic leak rates with powered compared to manual circular staplers. This finding is contrary to previous retrospective studies that found lower leak rates with powered staplers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The anastomotic leak (AL) is one of the most feared complications of colorectal surgery, since it is associated with a high rate of morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay and cost of care. Our aim was to determine the risk factors associated with anastomosis leak in colorectal cancer patients who underwent surgical resection with anastomosis. Methods: A multicentre observational, analytical, retrospective and case-control study was carried out. For each case, two controls were included from three national hospitals from Lima, Peru during the period 2021-2022. To determine the degree of association, multivariate logistic regression model was carried out. Results: A total of 360 patients were included, 120 from each hospital. The mean age of the population was 68.03 ± 14.21 years old. The majority were 65 years old or older (66.1%), 52.8% were female, and 63.3% had clinical stage III. The 40% of the patients had albumin levels lower than 3.5 g/dL. Regarding the surgery, 96.4% were elective, 68.9% underwent open approach, and 80.8% had an operative time of more than 180 minutes. Most of them had right colon cancer (50.8%). In the multivariate analysis, a significant association was found with the age variable (OR = 2.48; 95%CI:1.24-4.97), clinical tumour level (OR = 2.71; 95%CI:1.34-5.48), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Score (OR = 3.23; 95%CI:1.10-9.50), preoperative serum albumin (OR = 22.2; 95%CI:11.5-42.9). Conclusion: The most important independent risk factors associated with AL among patients with colorectal cancer were pre-operative such as lower preoperative serum albumin levels, followed by a higher ASA Score, clinical-stage III-IV, and an age ≥65 years old. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Anastomotic leak rates after colorectal surgery remain high. In most left-sided colon and rectal resection surgeries, a circular stapler is utilized to create the primary bowel anastomosis. However, it remains unclear whether a relationship between circular stapler technology and anastomotic leak in left-sided colorectal surgery exists. Methods A post-hoc analysis was conducted using a prospectively collected data set of patients from the 2017 European Society of Coloproctology snapshot audit who underwent elective left-sided resection (left hemicolectomy, sigmoid colectomy, or rectal resection) with a manual circular stapled anastomosis. Rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay in association with manual circular stapling were assessed. Patient-, disease-, geographical-, and surgeon-related factors as well as stapler brand were explored using multivariable regression models to identify predictors of adverse outcomes. Results Across 3305 procedures, 8.0% of patients had an anastomotic leak and 2.1% had an unplanned intensive care unit stay. Independent predictors of anastomotic leak were male sex, minimal-access surgery converted to open surgery, and anastomosis height C11 (lower third rectum) (all P < 0.050). Independent predictors of unplanned intensive care unit stay were minimal-access surgery converted to open surgery and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade IV (all P < 0.050). Stapler device brand was not a predictor of anastomotic leak or unplanned intensive care unit stay in multivariable regression analysis. There were no differences in rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay according to stapler head diameter, geographical region, or surgeon experience. Conclusion In patients undergoing left-sided bowel anastomosis, choice of manual circular stapler, in terms of manufacturer or head diameter, is not associated with rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Anastomotic leak (AL) remains the most important complication after left-sided colic anastomoses and technical complications during anastomotic construction are responsible of higher leakage incidence. Powered circular stapler (PCS) in colorectal surgery has been introduced in order to reduce technical errors and post-operative complications due to the manual circular stapler (MCS). Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. An electronic systematic search was performed using Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase of studies comparing PCS and MCS. The incidence of AL, anastomotic bleeding (AB), conversion, and reoperation were assessed. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42024512644. Results: Five observational studies were eligible for inclusion reporting on 2379 patients. The estimated pooled Risk Ratios for AL and AB rates following PCS were significantly lower than those observed with MCS (0.44 and 0.23, respectively; both with p < 0.01). Conversion and reoperation rate did not show any significant difference: 0.41 (95% CI 0.09–1.88; p = 0.25) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.33–1.84; p = 0.57); respectively. Conclusion: The use of PCS demonstrates a lower incidence of AL and AB compared to MCS but does not exhibit a discernible influence on reintervention or conversion rates. The call for future randomized clinical trials aims to definitively clarify these issues and contribute to further advancements in refining surgical strategies for left-sided colonic resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Following bowel surgery, infectious complications, including anastomotic leak (AL), remain major sources of morbidity and mortality. Bowel preparation is often administered with the assumption that gut decontamination reduces post-surgical complications. In this study, we tested this hypothesis using a murine model of colon surgery. The mice were fed either regular chow or a high-fat, high-sugar Western diet. The day before surgery, the mice received one of four interventions: water (control), mechanical bowel preparation (MBP), oral antibiotics (OA), or both MBP and OA. We found no differences in the rates of AL among the experimental groups, and diet did not appear to affect the outcomes. Exploratory analyses showed changes in the gut microbiome consistent with the different treatments, but investigations of fecal short-chain fatty acids and RNA sequencing of colonic tissue did not reveal specific effects of the treatments or the presence of AL. However, we did identify bacterial genera that may be causally associated with AL and developed a predictive index from stool samples as a marker for the presence of AL. Future research is needed to identify and validate a microbial predictive tool and to uncover the microbial-driven mechanisms that lead to AL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To assess the impact of topical papaverine administration in complete and incomplete colonic anastomosis, by examining bursting pressure, hydroxyproline concentration, collagen content, inflammation levels, inflammatory cell infiltration, neoangiogenesis, and necrosis grades. Methods: We performed an experimental study on rats, in which they were divided into the following 4 groups of 16 subjects each. Group 1 [complete anastomosis (CA) without papaverine (CA -P) group], Group 2 [CA with papaverine (CA +P) group], Group 3 [incomplete anastomosis (ICA) without papaverine (ICA -P) group], and Group 4 [ICA with papaverine (ICA +P) group]. Results: The lymphocyte infiltration score of the ICA +P3 (day 3) group was significantly higher compared to the ICA -P3 group (p = 0.018). The median Ehrlich–Hunt score (p = 0.012), inflammation score (p = 0.026), and neutrophil infiltration score (p = 0.041) of the CA +P7 (day 7) group were significantly lower than the corresponding data of the CA -P7 group. Additionally, the necrosis score of the ICA +P7 group was significantly lower than that of the ICA -P7 group (p = 0.014). Conclusions: Data from the current study reveal that, although topical papaverine seems to suppress inflammation in anastomosis tissue and reduce necrosis at 7 days, definite conclusions regarding its impact on anastomotic leak cannot be drawn without further studies investigating anastomotic wound healing and anastomotic leak, preferably with both shorter- and longer-term evaluations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To summarize and share our institutional experience in the conservative managements of anastomotic leak in infants under ultrasonic monitoring for Hirschsprung's disease (HD) over the last two years. Methods From January 2020 to December 2021, a HD child underwent pull-through and conservative treatment was offered for anastomotic leak. Under ultrasound monitoring, anal dilatation, catheter drainage, systemic and local anti-infection and placing anal tube under local anesthesia and sedation were performed. The outcomes were summarized. Results There were 3 girls and 1 boy. The causes were rectosigmoid segment HD (n=2), long segment HD (n=1) and total colonic aganglionosis (n=1). Operative age was (311) month. Anastomosis leak occurred at Day 7/15/21/50 post-operation. All external openings were located at 6 o'clock point with presacral abscess. Three cases healed at Day 34/48/72 and 1 child underwent enterostomy. Function was satisfactory without stricture or sinus tract formation. Conclusions HD with postoperative anastomotic leak and local abscess formation may be managed conservatively under ultrasonic monitoring. Non-responsive cases should be operated as soon as possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Diverting stomas are routinely used in restorative surgery following total mesorectal exicision (TME) for rectal cancer to mitigate the clinical risks of anastomotic leakage (AL). However, routine diverting stomas are associated with their own complication profile and may not be required in all patients. A tailored approach based on personalized risk of AL and selective use of diverting stoma may be more appropriate. The aim of the TAilored SToma policY (TASTY) project was to design and pilot a standardized, tailored approach to diverting stoma in low rectal cancer. Method: A mixed‐methods approach was employed. Phase I externally validated the anastomotic failure observed risk score (AFORS). We compared the observed rate of AL in our cohort to the theoretical, predicted risk of the AFORS score. To identify the subset of patients who would benefit from early closure of the diverting stoma using C‐reactive protein (CRP) we calculated the Youden index. Phase II designed the TASTY approach based on the results of Phase I. This was evaluated within a second prospective cohort study in patients undergoing TME for rectal cancer between April 2018 and April 2020. Results: A total of 80 patients undergoing TME surgery for rectal cancer between 2016 and 2018 participated in the external validation of the AFORS score. The overall observed AL rate in this cohort of patients was 17.5% (n = 14). There was a positive correlation between the predicted and observed rates of AL using the AFORS score. Using ROC curves, we calculated a CRP cutoff value of 115 mg/L on postoperative day 2 for AL with a sensitivity of 86% and a negative predictive value of 96%. The TASTY approach was designed to allocate patients with a low risk AFORS score to primary anastomosis with no diverting stoma and high risk AFORS score patients to a diverting stoma, with early closure at 8–14 days, if CRP values and postoperative CT were satisfactory. The TASTY approach was piloted in 122 patients, 48 (39%) were identified as low risk (AFORS score 0–1) and 74 (61%) were considered as high risk (AFORS score 2–6). The AL rate was 10% in the low‐risk cohort of patient compared to 23% in the high‐risk cohort of patients, p = 0.078 The grade of Clavien‐Dindo morbidity was equivalent. The incidence of major LARS was lowest in the no stoma cohort at 3 months (p = 0.014). Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of employing a selective approach to diverting stoma in patients with a low anastomosis following TME surgery for rectal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anastomotic leak (AL) remains a severe complication following colorectal surgery, leading to increased morbidity and mortality, particularly in cases of delayed diagnosis. Existing diagnostic methods, including computed tomography (CT) scans, contrast enemas, endoscopic examinations, and reoperations can confirm AL but lack strong predictive value. Early detection is crucial for improving patient outcomes, yet a definitive and reliable predictive test, or "gold standard," is still lacking. A comprehensive PubMed review was focused on CT imaging, serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT) to assess their predictive utility in detecting AL after colorectal resection. Three independent reviewers evaluated eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the studies. Summarized in detailed tables, our analysis revealed the effectiveness of both CRP and PCT in the early detection of AL during the postoperative period. CT imaging, capable of identifying fluid collection, pneumoperitoneum, extraluminal contrast extravasation, abscess formation, and other early signs of leak, also proved valuable. Considering the variability in findings and statistics across these modalities, our study suggests a personalized, multimodal approach to predicting AL. Integrating CRP and PCT assessments with the diagnostic capabilities of CT imaging provides a nuanced, patient-specific strategy that significantly enhances early detection and management. By tailoring interventions based on individual clinical characteristics, surgeons can optimize patient outcomes, reduce morbidity, and mitigate the consequences associated with AL after colorectal surgery. This approach emphasizes the importance of personalized medicine in surgical care, paving the way for improved patient health outcomes. • Anastomotic leak (AL) after colorectal surgery demands urgent detection. • CRP and PCT show promise as biomarkers for early detection of AL. • Varied diagnostic methods at different postoperative stages enhance AL prediction. • Consider individual patient factors for personalized biomarker interpretation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) is a congenital malformation that occurs in about 1 in 2500-4000 live births. After surgical repair, despite the lack of evidence supporting the routine use of postoperative esophagram, most surgeons report obtaining an esophagram prior to enteral feeding. We hypothesized that abnormal indicators in vital signs, drain characteristics, and chest radiograph (CXR) could be used to screen for anastomotic leak, thus reducing the need for a routine esophagram. A single institution, retrospective chart review of all patients born with EA with or without TEF between 2009 and 2022 was performed. Vital signs, postoperative CXR, chest drain characteristics, and esophagram results were analyzed for patients who underwent repair. Forty-five patients who underwent EA/TEF repair were included in the study, and 40 patients had routine esophagram. Out of the twenty-two patients who had at least one abnormal indicator, 14 (64%) had an anastomotic leak. Seventeen patients (43%) had the absence of abnormalities of all three indicators, and none of these patients had an anastomotic leak (100% negative predictive value). Moreover, changes in drain characteristics and vital signs together presented high sensitivity (87.5%), specificity (90%), and negative predictive value (94%). In the absence of abnormalities in vital signs, CXR, and drain characteristics in patients undergoing EA/TEF repair, routine esophagram can be safely avoided prior to enteral feeding. Abnormalities in drain characteristics and vital signs together were highly sensitive and specific for anastomotic leak, thus potentially eliminating the need for routine CXR and thereby minimizing radiation exposure and cost. • Esophagram can be avoided post esophageal atresia repair if clear criteria are met. • The criteria involve vital signs, chest drain output, and chest radiograph. • Chest drain output is the most reliable independent predictor of anastomotic leak. • Abnormal drain character and vitals together were predictive of anastomotic leak. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most feared complications in colorectal surgery, with an incidence of 12–39% and associated risk of mortality of 2–24%. The causes of AL and the ways to prevent it are currently under investigation. This study aims to verify if a quadruple assessment of colorectal anastomosis could reduce AL incidence. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on rectal cancer surgery performed from January 2015 to December 2017 and from January 2021 to December 2023 at a tertiary referral cancer centre was performed. Demographics, clinicopathological features, short-term outcomes, recurrences, and survival were investigated. Results: A total of 293 patients were enrolled. AL incidence was lower in the quadruple assessment group than in the control group, reaching a statistically significant result (7.7% vs. 16%; p = 0.001). This result was also confirmed after a propensity score match analysis (PSM), in which the AL rate was lower in the quadruple assessment group (5.4% vs. 12.3%; p = 0.01). Conclusions: This study shows how the systematic implementation of a quadruple assessment when performing a colorectal anastomosis could increase awareness on anastomotic success and reduce the incidence of AL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (MBS) is the most effective management for patients with obesity and weight-related medical conditions. Duodenal switch (DS) is a recent MBS procedure with increasing attention in recent years, however the risk of anastomotic or staple line leaks and the lack of efficient surgical expertise hinders the procedure from becoming fully adopted. To determine the 30-day predictors of leaks following DS and explore their association with other 30-day postoperative complications. Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database. Patients who underwent a primary biliopancreatic diversion with DS or single-anastomosis duodenoileostomy with sleeve procedure, categorized as DS, were assessed for 30-day leaks. A multivariable logistic regression was constructed to identify the predictors of leaks. The assessment of postoperative complications arising from leaks was also performed. A total of 21,839 DS patients were included, of which 177 (.8%) experienced leaks within 30 postoperative days. The most significant predictor of leaks was steroid immunosuppressive use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.56–5.13], P <.001) and age, with each decade of life associated with a 26% increase in risk (aOR = 1.26, 95% CI [1.09–1.45], P =.001). Operative length was also associated with leaks, with every additional 30 minutes increasing the odds of a leak by 23% (aOR = 1.23, 95% CI [1.18–1.29], P <.001). The occurrence of leaks was correlated with postoperative septic shock (Crude Odds Ratio [COR] = 280.99 [152.60–517.39]) and unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (COR = 79.04 [56.99–109.59]). Additionally, mortality rates increased 17-fold with the incidence of leaks (COR = 17.64 [7.41–41.99]). Leaks following DS are a serious postoperative complication with significant risk factors of steroid use, prolonged operative time and advanced age. Leaks are also associated with other severe complications, highlighting the need for early diagnosis and intervention along with additional studies to further validate our results. • A total of 21,839 duodenal switch patients were obtained from the MBSAQIP database. • The incidence of 30-day leaks was.8%. • Predictors of leaks included chronic steroid use and prolonged operative time. • Leaks were correlated with increased complications such as renal failure and sepsis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of incorporating additional venous anastomoses (venous super charging) in improving gastric conduit congestion and preventing complications such as conduit loss and anastomotic leakage following esophagectomy. We included two consecutive patients, one undergoing esophagectomy and the other undergoing laryngo-pharyngo-esophagectomy. Additional venous anastomoses were performed to alleviate venous congestion at the oral end of the gastric conduit. The perfusion assessment of the anastomosis was evaluated using indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG FA) by Stryker's SPY PHI device. Both patients experienced anastomotic leakage, with one having a grade 2 leak and the other a grade 1 leak. Fortunately, conservative measures proved successful in managing these complications and there was no conduit loss. The incorporation of additional venous anastomoses effectively relieves venous congestion in the gastric conduit after esophagectomy and prevent conduit loss, indicating its potential in improving patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Indocyanine Green (ICG) is a promising technique for the assessment of gastric conduit and anastomosis perfusion during esophagectomy. ICG integration may be helpful in minimizing the risk of anastomotic leak (AL). Literature evidence is sparse, while the real effect of ICG assessment on AL minimization remains unsolved. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare short-term outcomes between ICG-guided and non-ICG-guided (nICG) esophagogastric anastomosis during esophagectomy for cancer. Materials and Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were queried up to 25 April 2024. Studies that reported short-term outcomes for ICG versus non-ICG-guided (nICG) anastomosis in patients undergoing esophagectomy were considered. Primary outcome was AL. Risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) were utilized as effect size measures, whereas to assess relative inference we used 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results: Overall, 1399 patients (11 observational studies) were included. Overall, 576 (41.2%) underwent ICG gastric conduit assessment. The patients' ages ranged from 22 to 91 years, with 73% being male. The cumulative incidence of AL was 10.4% for ICG and 15.4% for nICG. Compared to nICG, ICG utilization was related to a reduced risk for postoperative AL (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.23–0.99; p = 0.05). No differences were found in terms of pulmonary complications (RR 0.83), operative time (SMD −0.47), hospital length of stay (SMD −0.16), or 90-day mortality (RR 1.70). Conclusions: Our study seems to indicate a potential impact of ICG in reducing post-esophagectomy AL. However, because of limitations in the design of the included studies, allocation/reporting bias, variable definitions of AL, and heterogeneity in ICG use, caution is required to avoid potential overestimation of the ICG effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Colorectal surgery for cancer is associated with a high rate of surgical complications, including anastomotic leakage. The ability to predict the risk of leakage early enough seems to be of high value, since it would facilitate the design of personalized treatment and duration of hospitalization. Although different studies present the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR] as having a strong predictive value, there is a discrepancy with respect to which postoperative day is the most reliable. We evaluated a series of NLR values, from the day before surgery up to the POD7, in a cohort of 245 colorectal surgery patients in order to clarify the best predictable score for the identification of the risk of anastomotic leakage. There were 28 patients with leaks. ROC curve analysis of NLR on POD1 indicates that a cut-off point ≥ 7.4 exerts a negative prediction for leakage (AUC 0.881, sensitivity 68.7%, specificity 96.4%, PPV 28.4%, and NPV of 99.3%), thus excluding 150 patients from the risk of leakage. Furthermore, the ROC curve analysis of NLR on POD4 indicates that a cut-off point ≥ 6.5 gives a positive prediction of leakage (AUC 0.698, sensitivity 82.1%, specificity 51.6%, PPV 17.6%, and NPV of 95.6%), thus indicating 52 patients as being at high risk of leakage. Finally, NLR failed to identify five leaks out of twenty-eight. These results strongly indicate the ability of NLR on POD1 to predict patients at low risk of developing a leak and then on POD4 to predict the high-risk patients. This makes our study particularly innovative, in that it enables doctors to concentrate on potential high-risk patients from POD1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Methods Results Conclusions The objective of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to pool randomized trials of patients undergoing left‐sided colorectal anastomosis, comparing the use of fluorescence perfusion imaging versus visual inspection in reducing anastomotic leaks.Databases searched included PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, CINHAL (EBSCO), and Google Scholar based on the concepts: randomized, colorectal, anastomotic leak, and fluorescence imaging. The risk of bias was assessed using RoB2 and the certainty of the evidence with the GRADE Pro tool. The analysis used the log odds ratio for dichotomous data with 95% confidence intervals. Back‐transformation of the log odds to odds ratio was performed for the summary of findings. All syntheses used the Random‐effects model.Six randomized trials were included with 1949 patients and 204 events (leaks). Three trials included exclusively rectal cancer patients, while the other three involved benign and malignant pathologies of the sigmoid and rectum. The use of ostomy and preoperative radiation was variable. None of the studies had a high risk of bias. The pooled odds ratio for anastomotic leak reduction with Indocyanine Green (ICG) fluorescence was 0.586 (95% CI: 0.434–0.792). An absolute reduction of 4.7% in leak rates was observed, with no statistical heterogeneity (I2 = 0; p = 0.529). Due to clinical heterogeneity, the quality of evidence was rated moderate.The use of ICG is associated with reduced leak rates following left‐sided colorectal anastomosis with moderate confidence. ICG may be considered a standard of care given the clinically significant benefit in decreasing anastomotic leaks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionRigid proctosigmoidoscopy (RP) and flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) are two modalities commonly used for intraoperative evaluation of colorectal anastomoses. This study seeks to determine whether there is an association between the endoscopic modality used to evaluate colorectal anastomoses and the rate of anastomotic leak (AL), organ space infection, and overall infectious complication.MethodsThe 2012-2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients undergoing colorectal anastomoses. Anastomotic evaluation method (RP versus FS) was identified by Current Procedural Terminologycoding and used for group classification. Outcomes measured included AL, organ space infections, and overall infection. Multivariable logistic regression analysis for predicting AL was performed.ResultsWe identified 7100 patients who underwent a colorectal anastomosis with intraoperative endoscopic evaluation. RP was utilized in 3397 (47.8%) and FS in 3703 (52.2%) patients. RP was used more commonly in diverticulitis (44.5% versus 36.2%, P

Background: We investigated the impact of Indocyanine Green (ICG) angiography on reducing anastomotic leakage (AL) after elective left segmental colon resection, including transverse resection. While ICG is widely used in colorectal surgery to assess vascularization, its true effect on AL, particularly in left segmental resections, remains unclear. Study design: This retrospective, monocentric cohort study included patients undergoing left and transverse colon resection from January 2017 to July 2023. Patients were divided into ICG and no-ICG groups. The primary outcome was AL, with secondary outcomes including postoperative morbidity and length of stay. Results: Of the 115 patients enrolled, 53 received ICG and 63 did not. AL occurred in 6 patients in the no-ICG group, but none in the ICG group. No significant correlation was found between ICG use and other confounding factors. Postoperative length of stay was also shorter in the ICG group. Conclusions: The use of ICG was associated with a reduction in AL, with no cases in the ICG group. These findings suggest a potential benefit of ICG, warranting confirmation in future large-scale studies. Clinical trial registration: clinicaltrial.gov (NCT05981937).

Introduction: Surgeries involving bowel resection and anastomosis are quite common. Fluid overload, leading to tissue edema and impaired tissue perfusion, may contribute to anastomotic leak, which is one of the most dreaded complication. Methods: In our current study, CT scan, done on postoperative day-4, was used to assess visceral edema, and its effect on development of complications post bowel anastomosis and increase in value of cross section of body trunk area ≥20% was taken as an independent risk factor of severe complication. Results: Twenty three patients were enrolled in the study, 7 of them developed complications. The most common complication observed was wound infection (Clavein Dindo grade II). Only 2 patients (28.57%) had an increase in CT area >20%. Among patients who developed complications, 33.3% had an increase in CT area and 28.6% did not. Various other factors – preoperative albumin level, timing of surgery, duration of surgery – also lead to development of complications. Statistically, no significant association could be derived between the increase in CT area and development of complications. Conclusion: As per the findings of the current study, higher fluid balance was not reflected by an increase in body surface area on CT Scan. Hence, use of CT scan as a tool to assess visceral edema needs further evaluation.

The article discusses the use of preoperative oral antibiotics in colorectal surgery, highlighting the divergent practices between Europe and North America. Various meta-analyses have shown that combining oral and IV antibiotics can reduce surgical site infections and anastomotic leaks. While there is no international consensus on the use of oral antibiotics, ongoing research, such as the CABE trial, aims to evaluate their effectiveness in improving patient outcomes. The article also emphasizes the importance of antimicrobial stewardship to avoid bacterial resistance. [Extracted from the article]

PurposeAnastomotic leak is a dreaded complication of colorectal surgery. An endoscopic grading score of the perianastomotic mucosa has been previously developed at our institution (UCI) to assess colorectal anastomotic integrity. The objective of this study is to validate the UCI anastomotic score and determine its impact in anastomotic failure.MethodsAs a follow-up study of the UCI grading score implementation during 2011 to 2014, patients undergoing stapled colorectal anastomoses after sigmoidectomy or proctectomy at a single institution from 2015 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped into three tiers based on endoscopic appearance (grade 1, circumferentially normal mucosa; grade 2, ischemia/congestion  30% of circumference).ResultsOn the basis of endoscopic mucosal evaluation, grade 1 anastomosis was observed in 299 patients (94%), grade 2 anastomosis in 14 patients (4.4%), and grade 3 anastomosis in 5 patients (1.6%). All grade 3 classifications were immediately and successfully revised intraoperatively with reclassification as a grade 1 anastomosis. The anastomotic leak rate of the follow-up study period from 2015 to 2018 was 6.4% which was lower compared to the anastomotic leak rate of 12.2% in the original study period from 2011 to 2014 (p = 0.07). Anastomotic leak rate for the entire patient series was 8.5%. A grade 2 anastomosis was associated with higher anastomotic leak rate compared to a grade 1 anastomosis (35.7% vs. 7.4%, p

Aortic anastomotic leak is an uncommon complication after ascending aortic replacement for acute aortic dissection. Redo-surgery is the traditional standard treatment despite high mortality and morbidity. Recently, endovascular treatment has been attempted as an alternative approach in a few case reports. Here, we present two cases of aortic anastomotic leak due to suture line dehiscence after aortic graft replacement for type A aortic dissection, which were successfully treated by coil with subsequent N-butyl cyanoacrylate embolization and an AmplatzerTM vascular plug.

Aim: Splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) is commonly performed during left‐sided colon and rectal resections. The aim of the present systematic review was to assess the outcomes of SFM in left‐sided colon and rectal resections and the risk factors for complications and anastomotic leak (AL). Method: This study was a PRISMA‐compliant systematic review. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for studies that assessed the outcomes of sigmoid and rectal resections with or without SFM. The primary outcomes were AL and total complications, and the secondary outcomes were individual complications, operating time, conversion to open surgery, length of hospital stay (LOS) and pathological and oncological outcomes. Results: Nineteen studies including data on 81 116 patients (49.1% male) were reviewed. SFM was undertaken in 40.7% of patients. SFM was associated with a longer operating time (weighted mean difference 24.50, 95% CI 14.47–34.52, p < 0.0001) and higher odds of AL (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.06–1.33, p = 0.002). Both groups had similar odds of total complications, splenic injury, anastomotic stricture, conversion to open surgery, (LOS), local recurrence, and overall survival. A secondary analysis of rectal cancer cases only showed similar outcomes for SFM and the control group. Conclusions: SFM was associated with a longer operating time and higher odds of AL, yet a similar likelihood of total complications, splenic injury, anastomotic stricture, conversion to open surgery, LOS, local recurrence, and overall survival. These conclusions must be cautiously interpreted considering the numerous study limitations. SFM may have only been selectively undertaken in cases in which anastomotic tension was suspected. Therefore, the suboptimal anastomoses may have been the reason for SFM rather than the SFM being causative of the anastomotic insufficiencies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The modified Graham patch repair is a well-established technique for management of perforating foregut injuries, often learned by surgeons during general surgery training. There is, however, little to no data regarding the utilization of this technique for perforation of the distal midgut or in the re-operative field. We present two cases of midgut anastomotic complications successfully managed with modified graham patch repair at our institution. The first case is a 79-year-old female who underwent an emergent right hemicolectomy at an outside institution for management of an iatrogenic perforation during endoscopic polypectomy. Over the course of two years she underwent numerous abdominal operations, due to various complications, ultimately resulting in multiple resections and end ileostomy creation. She then had her ileostomy reversed by laparoscopic single incision (SILS) technique at our institution. This was also complicated by anastomotic leak. Intraoperatively, adequate mobilization of the anastomosis for resection was deemed not safe due to dense fibrosis and adhesions in the re-operative field; therefore, she underwent a SILS modified Graham patch repair of an ileocolic anastomotic defect with diverting loop ileostomy. Post-operatively, she had no radiographic evidence of leak from the repaired anastomosis, which facilitated successful loop ileostomy reversal five months later. Our second case is a 64-year-old male referred to our institution for management of his stage IV colon cancer. He underwent an open right hemicolectomy and hepatic metastectomy, which was complicated by anastomotic leak. The small defect was repaired via a SILS modified Graham patch technique. Five months postoperatively, he had neither radiographic nor endoscopic evidence of a leak; therefore, he successfully underwent ileostomy reversal without complication. We encourage further investigation and reporting of the role of the modified graham patch repair in management of midgut anastomotic complications, particularly when resection and re-anastomosis is unsafe due to a hostile re-operative field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is currently no consensus as to how to manage esophageal anastomotic leaks. Intervention with endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC), stenting, reoperation, and conservative management have all been mooted as potential options. To conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the optimal management strategy for esophageal anastomotic leaks. A systematic review was performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines with extension for NMA. NMA was performed using R packages and Shiny. In total, 12 retrospective studies were included, which included 511 patients. Of the 449 patients for whom data regarding sex was available, 371 (82.6%) were male, 78 (17.4%) were female. The average age of patients was 62.6 years (standard deviation 10.2). The stenting cohort included 245 (47.9%) patients. The EVAC cohort included 123 (24.1%) patients. The conservative cohort included 87 (17.0%) patients. The reoperation cohort included 56 (10.9%) patients. EVAC had a significantly decreased complication rate compared to stenting (odds ratio 0.23 95%, confidence interval [CI] 0.09;0.58). EVAC had a significantly lower mortality rate than stenting (odds ratio 0.43, 95% CI 0.21; 0.87). Reoperation was used in significantly larger leaks than stenting (mean difference 14.66, 95% CI 4.61;24.70). The growing use of EVAC as a first-line intervention in esophageal anastomotic leaks should continue given its proven effectiveness and significant reduction in both complication and mortality rates. Surgical management is often necessary for significantly larger leaks and will likely remain an effective option in uncontained leaks with systemic features. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Anastomotic leak (AF) is a surgical complication, with an incidence of 2-14% and a mortality rate of 5-22%. The diagnosis is based on clinical and radiological criteria; it is associated with re-interventions, longer hospital stay and costs. Aim: To evaluate the use of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) as early predictors of anastomotic leak (AL) in elective colon surgery. Material and Method Prospective observational study. 107 patients who underwent a partial colectomy for cancer with elective primary anastomosis in the Hospital Hernán Henríquez Aravena surgery unit in Temuco from April 2019 to April 2022. CRP and PCT were measured in all patients in the first 4 postoperative days. The primary measurement outcome was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV) of CRP and PCT for AF. Results: 7.4% of the total presented AL. The PCT and CRP values were high in all the patients tending to normalization on the fourth postoperative day, except in the presence of a postoperative complication. The ROC curve analysis showed an area under the curve of 93% and 75% for CRP and PCT respectively on the third postoperative day, with this being the best combination. Conclusion Both PCT and CRP are useful predictors of AL, with a high NPV on the third postoperative day. These precede the clinic and require an imaging study to confirm the diagnosis and act immediately to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with this complication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Colorectal anastomotic leakage causes severe consequences for patients and healthcare system as it will lead to increased consumption of hospital resources and costs. Technological improvements in anastomotic devices could reduce the incidence of leakage and its economic impact. The aim of the present study was to assess if the use of a new powered circular stapler is cost-effective. Method: This observational study included patients undergoing left-sided circular stapled colorectal anastomosis between January 2018 and December 2021. Propensity score matching was carried out to create two comparable groups depending on whether the anastomosis was performed using a manual or powered circular device. The rate of anastomotic leakage, its severity, the consumption of hospital resources, and its cost were the main outcome measures. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the powered circular stapler versus manual circular staplers was performed. Results: A total of 330 patients were included in the study, 165 in each group. Anastomotic leakage rates were significantly different (p = 0.012): 22 patients (13.3%) in the manual group versus 8 patients (4.8%) in the powered group. The effectiveness of the powered stapler and manual stapler was 98.27% and 93.69%, respectively. The average cost per patient in the powered group was €6238.38, compared with €9700.12 in the manual group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was − €74,915.28 per patient without anastomotic complications. Conclusion: The incremental cost of powered circular stapler compared with manual devices was offset by the savings from lowered incidence and cost of management of anastomotic leaks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction. Protective diverting ileostomy is performed with the aim of protecting the intestinal anastomosis after a colorectal resection. This intestinal resection is the most frequently performed extended procedure in patients with ovarian cancer, in order to achieve complete cytoreduction. Knowing the indications, use, techniques and complications of ileostomies is important for multidisciplinary groups that treat these patients. Methods. We conducted a search in PubMed via Medline and an updated narrative review of the main findings on the indications, surgical techniques, complications and use of diverting ileostomy in ovarian cancer. Results. The use of diverting ileostomy in ovarian cancer remains a controversial issue. To date, neither diverting ileostomy nor ghost ileostomy have been associated with a reduction in the incidence of anastomotic leak, but both techniques could decrease its severity. Conclusion. The diverting ileostomy in ovarian cancer is used to protect a distal anastomosis after intestinal resection, in case of anastomotic leak if a previous ostomy has not been performed or in case of intestinal obstruction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú is the property of Sociedad de Gastroenterologia del Peru and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose: Coloanal anastomosis with loop diverting ileostomy (CAA) is an option for low anterior resection of the rectum, and Turnbull-Cutait coloanal anastomosis (TCA) regained popularity in the effort to offer patients a reconstructive option. In this context, we aimed to compare both techniques. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus were searched for studies published until January 2024. Odds ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled with a random-effects model. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q test and I2 statistics, with p-values inferior to 0.10 and I2 >25% considered significant. Statistical analysis was conducted in RStudio version 4.1.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing). Registered number CRD42024509963. Results: One randomized controlled trial and nine observational studies were included, comprising 1,743 patients, of whom 899 (51.5%) were submitted to TCA and 844 (48.5%) to CAA. Most patients had rectal cancer (52.2%), followed by megacolon secondary to Chagas disease (32.5%). TCA was associated with increased colon ischemia (OR 3.54; 95% CI 1.13 to 11.14; p < 0.031; I2 = 0%). There were no differences in postoperative complications classified as Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb, anastomotic leak, pelvic abscess, intestinal obstruction, bleeding, permanent stoma, or anastomotic stricture. In subgroup analysis of patients with cancer, TCA was associated with a reduction in anastomotic leak (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.97 p = 0.04; I2 = 34%). Conclusion: TCA was associated with a decrease in anastomotic leak rate in subgroups analysis of patients with cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Rectal cancer (RC) is a surgical challenge due to its technical complexity. The double-stapled (DS) technique, a standard for colorectal anastomosis, has been associated with notable drawbacks, including a high incidence of anastomotic leak (AL). Low anterior resection with transanal transection and single-stapled (TTSS) anastomosis has emerged to mitigate those drawbacks. Methods: Observational study in which it described the technical aspects and results of the initial group of patients with medium-low RC undergoing elective laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) and TTSS. Results: Twenty-two patients were included in the series. Favourable postoperative outcomes with a median length of stay of 5 days and an AL incidence of 9.1%. Importantly, all patients achieved complete mesorectal excision with tumour-free margins, and no mortalities were reported. Conclusion: TTSS emerges as a promising alternative for patients with middle and lower rectal tumours, offering potential benefits in terms of morbidity reduction and oncological integrity compared with other techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]