Search

The youth (15-24 years old) in South Africa remain at high risk of HIV infection despite varied efforts to control the disease. An understanding of the perspectives of relevant stakeholders of HIV-prevention interventions targeting the youth is important to guide research, policy and practice aimed at improving these interventions. This study explores youth and intervention implementers' perceptions of a resilience-based HIV-prevention intervention (You Only Live Once) aimed at reducing risky sexual behaviours among the youth in South Africa. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 young people who participated in the intervention, and four intervention implementers at a not-for-profit organisation in Maluti-a-Phofung Local Municipality, South Africa. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Three main themes emerged from the data: (1) Acceptability and impact of the intervention; (2) Factors influencing intervention implementation; and (3) Recommendations to improve intervention implementation. These findings provide insights into the acceptability, impact, barriers and facilitators of resiliencebased HIV-prevention interventions for the youth in South Africa and similar contexts, and how implementation of these interventions could be enhanced. The findings can help researchers, policy makers and health care practitioners in the field of HIV prevention to improve interventions targeting young people. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The COVID-19 pandemic mandated a substantial switch in primary health care delivery from an in-person to a mainly remote telephone or video service. As the COVID-19 pandemic approaches its third year, limited progress appears to have been made in terms of policy development around consultation methods for the post-acute phase of the pandemic. In September 2020, the International Primary Care Respiratory Group convened a global panel of primary care clinicians – including family physicians, paediatricians, pharmacists, academics and patients – to consider the policy and health management implications of the move to remote consultations in the primary care setting. The group gave special consideration to how and how far remote consultations should be integrated into routine primary health care delivery. Remote consultations can be a useful alternative to in-person consultations in primary care not only in situations where there is a need for viral infection control but also for the routine delivery of chronic disease management. However, they may not be more time efficient for the clinician, and they can add to the workload and work-related stress for primary care practitioners if they remain the dominant consultation mode. Remote consultations are also less appropriate than in-person consultations for new disease diagnosis, dealing with multiple issues and providing complex care. Ensuring health care professionals have the appropriate skill set to effectively deliver remote consultations, administrative and/or IT support and appropriate reimbursement will be key to achieving optimal integration of remote consultations into routine clinical practice. Addressing digital access and digital literacy issues at a societal level will also be essential to ensure individuals have fair and equitable access to the internet and sufficient security for exchange of personal and health-related data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bat coronaviruses (CoVs) are extremely prevalent throughout the globe and exhibit a wide range of genetic diversity. Currently, little is known about the susceptibility of New World bats to severe acute respiratory syndrome-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of COVID-19. Also, there is limited information about the genetic diversity of other CoVs in the New World bats. The determination of genetic diversity of bat CoVs through continuous surveillance is essential to predict and mitigate the emergence of new CoVs and their impacts on the health of both humans and animals. In this study, 491 guano specimens collected from New World bats and 37 specimens collected from Old World bats during July 2020 to July 2021 were tested for SARS-COV-2 and other CoVs using a real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) panel and pan-coronavirus PCR that target a highly conserved region of CoVs. No evidence of SARS-CoV-2 was found in the tested specimens. An alpha CoV was detected in a single specimen from a big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus). This information was used by wildlife agencies and rehabilitation facilities to permit the release of bats during the pandemic while mitigating the risk of spreading SARS-CoV-2 among North American bats and other wild animal populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]