Search

Cytochrome c-oxidase (COX), the terminal enzyme of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, plays a key role in the regulation of aerobic production of energy. Biogenesis of eukaryotic COX involves the coordinated action of two genomes. Three mitochondrial DNA-encoded subunits form the catalytic core of the enzyme, which contains metal prosthetic groups. Another 10 subunits encoded in the nuclear DNA act as a protective shield surrounding the core. COX biogenesis requires the assistance of >20 additional nuclear-encoded factors acting at all levels of the process. Expression of the mitochondrial-encoded subunits, expression and import of the nuclearencoded subunits, insertion of the structural subunits into the mitochondrial inner membrane, addition of prosthetic groups, assembly of the holoenzyme, further maturation to form a dimer, and additional assembly into supercomplexes are all tightly regulated processes in a nuclear-mitochondrial-coordinated fashion. Such regulation ensures the building of a highly efficient machine able to catalyze the safe transfer of electrons from cytochrome c to molecular oxygen and ultimately facilitate the aerobic production of ATP. In this review, we will focus on describing and analyzing the present knowledge about the different regulatory checkpoints in COX assembly and the dynamic relationships between the different factors involved in the process. We have used information mostly obtained from the suitable yeast model, but also from bacterial and animal systems, by means of large-scale genetic, molecular biology, and physiological approaches and by integrating information concerning individual elements into a cellular system network. systems biology; proteomics; genomics; transcription; translation

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, mitoribosomes are composed of a 54S large subunit (mtLSU) and a 37S small subunit (mtSSU). The two subunits altogether contain 73 mitoribosome proteins (MRPs) and two ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs). Although mitoribosomes preserve some similarities with their bacterial counterparts, they have significantly diverged by acquiring new proteins, protein extensions, and new RNA segments, adapting the mitoribosome to the synthesis of highly hydrophobic membrane proteins. In this study, we investigated the functional relevance of mitochondria‐specific protein extensions at the C‐terminus (C) or N‐terminus (N) present in 19 proteins of the mtLSU. The studied mitochondria‐specific extensions consist of long tails and loops extending from globular domains that mainly interact with mitochondria‐specific proteins and 21S rRNA moieties extensions. The expression of variants devoid of extensions in uL4 (C), uL5 (N), uL13 (N), uL13 (C), uL16 (C), bL17 (N), bL17 (C), bL21 (24), uL22 (N), uL23 (N), uL23 (C), uL24 (C), bL27 (C), bL28 (N), bL28 (C), uL29 (N), uL29 (C), uL30 (C), bL31 (C), and bL32 (C) did not rescue the mitochondrial protein synthesis capacities and respiratory growth of the respective null mutants. On the contrary, the truncated form of the mitoribosome exit tunnel protein uL24 (N) yields a partially functional mitoribosome. Also, the removal of mitochondria‐specific sequences from uL1 (N), uL3 (N), uL16 (N), bL9 (N), bL19 (C), uL29 (C), and bL31 (N) did not affect the mitoribosome function and respiratory growth. The collection of mutants described here provides new means to study and evaluate defective assembly modules in the mitoribosome biogenesis process. Take away: The functional relevance of mit‐specific extensions of mLSU were evaluated.Seven mit‐specific extensions are not necessary for yeast respiratory growth.Removal of extensions from 14 mtLSU resulted in unfunctional variants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]