61 results on '"Baumgart, Amanda"'
Search Results
52. MOESM3 of Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE)
- Author
-
Tong, Allison, Synnot, Anneliese, Crowe, Sally, Hill, Sophie, Matus, Andrea, Scholes-Robertson, Nicole, Oliver, Sandy, Cowan, Katherine, Nasser, Mona, Soumyadeep Bhaumik, Gutman, Talia, Baumgart, Amanda, and Craig, Jonathan
- Subjects
Data_FILES ,3. Good health - Abstract
Additional file 3. Research priority setting: frameworks and reviews.
53. MOESM5 of Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE)
- Author
-
Tong, Allison, Synnot, Anneliese, Crowe, Sally, Hill, Sophie, Matus, Andrea, Scholes-Robertson, Nicole, Oliver, Sandy, Cowan, Katherine, Nasser, Mona, Soumyadeep Bhaumik, Gutman, Talia, Baumgart, Amanda, and Craig, Jonathan
- Subjects
Data_FILES ,3. Good health - Abstract
Additional file 5. Sources contributing to the reporting items.
54. MOESM3 of Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE)
- Author
-
Tong, Allison, Synnot, Anneliese, Crowe, Sally, Hill, Sophie, Matus, Andrea, Scholes-Robertson, Nicole, Oliver, Sandy, Cowan, Katherine, Nasser, Mona, Soumyadeep Bhaumik, Gutman, Talia, Baumgart, Amanda, and Craig, Jonathan
- Subjects
Data_FILES ,3. Good health - Abstract
Additional file 3. Research priority setting: frameworks and reviews.
55. Core outcomes set for trials in people with COVID-19
- Author
-
Tong, Allison, Elliott, Julian H, Cesar Azevedo, Luciano, Baumgart, Amanda, Bersten, Andrew, Cervantes, Lilia, Chew, Derek P, Cho, Yeoungjee, Cooper, Tess, Crowe, Sally, Douglas, Ivor S, Evangelidis, Nicole, Flemyng, Ella, Hannan, Elyssa, Horby, Peter, Howell, Martin, Lee, Jaehee, Emma, Liu, Lorca, Eduardo, Lynch, Deena, Marshall, John C, Matus Gonzalez, Andrea, McKenzie, Anne, Manera, Karine, McLeod, Charlie, Mehta, Sangeeta, Mer, Mervyn, Conway Morris, Andrew, Nseir, Saad, Povoa, Pedro, Reid, Mark, Sakr, Yasser, Shen, Ning, Smyth, Alan R, Snelling, Tom, Strippoli, Giovanni FM, Teixeira-Pinto, Armando, Torres, Antoni, Turner, Tari, Viecelli, Andrea, Webb, Steve, Williamson, Paula R, Woc-Colburn, Laila, Junhua, Zhang, Craig, Jonathan C, Conway Morris, Andrew [0000-0002-3211-3216], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
- Subjects
education - Abstract
Objective: The outcomes reported in trials in COVID-19 are extremely heterogeneous and of uncertain patient relevance, limiting their applicability for clinical decision-making. The aim of this workshop was to establish a core outcomes set for trials in people with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Design: Four international online multi-stakeholder consensus workshops were convened to discuss proposed core outcomes for trials in people with suspected or confirmed COVID-19, informed by a survey involving 9289 respondents from 111 countries. The transcripts were analyzed thematically. The workshop recommendations were used to finalize the core outcomes set Setting: International Participants: Adults aged 18 years and over with confirmed or suspected COVID-19, their family members, members of the general public and health professionals (including clinicians, policy makers, regulators, funders, researchers). Main Results: Six themes were identified. Responding to the critical and acute health crisis reflected the immediate focus on saving lives and preventing life-threatening complications that underpinned the high prioritization of mortality, respiratory failure, and multiorgan failure. Capturing different settings of care highlighted the need to minimize the burden on hospitals and to acknowledge outcomes in community settings. Encompassing the full trajectory and severity of disease was addressing longer-term impacts and the full spectrum of illness (e.g. shortness of breath and recovery). Distinguishing overlap, correlation and collinearity meant recognizing that symptoms such as shortness of breath had distinct value, and minimizing overlap (e.g. lung function and pneumonia were on the continuum toward respiratory failure). Recognizing adverse events refers to the potential harms of new and evolving interventions. Being cognizant of family and psychosocial wellbeing reflected the pervasive impacts of COVID-19. Conclusions: Mortality, respiratory failure, multiorgan failure, shortness of breath, and recovery are critically important outcomes to be consistently reported in COVID-19 trials., The project is funded by the Flinders University and the National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce, convened by the Australian Living Evidence Consortium, hosted by Cochrane Australia, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University supported by the Australian Government, Victorian Department of Health and Human Services, Ian Potter Foundation, Walter Cottman Endowment Fund (managed by Equity Trustees) and the Lord Mayor's Charitable Foundation). AT is supported by The University of Sydney Robinson Fellowship. ACM is supported by a Clinical Research Career Development Fellowship from the Wellcome Trust (WT 2055214/Z/16/Z)
56. MOESM1 of Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE)
- Author
-
Tong, Allison, Synnot, Anneliese, Crowe, Sally, Hill, Sophie, Matus, Andrea, Scholes-Robertson, Nicole, Oliver, Sandy, Cowan, Katherine, Nasser, Mona, Soumyadeep Bhaumik, Gutman, Talia, Baumgart, Amanda, and Craig, Jonathan
- Subjects
Data_FILES ,3. Good health - Abstract
Additional file 1. Search strategies.
57. MOESM4 of Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE)
- Author
-
Tong, Allison, Synnot, Anneliese, Crowe, Sally, Hill, Sophie, Matus, Andrea, Scholes-Robertson, Nicole, Oliver, Sandy, Cowan, Katherine, Nasser, Mona, Soumyadeep Bhaumik, Gutman, Talia, Baumgart, Amanda, and Craig, Jonathan
- Subjects
3. Good health - Abstract
Additional file 4. Preliminary REPRISE guideline.
58. Australian Workshops on Patients' Perspectives on Hemodialysis and Incremental Start.
- Author
-
Hegerty K, Jaure A, Scholes-Robertson N, Howard K, Ju A, Evangelidis N, Wolley M, Baumgart A, Johnson DW, Hawley CM, Reidlinger D, Hickey L, Welch A, Cho Y, Kerr PG, Roberts MA, Shen JI, Craig J, Krishnasamy R, and Viecelli AK
- Abstract
Introduction: Most patients with kidney failure commence and continue hemodialysis (HD) thrice weekly. Incremental initiation (defined as HD less than thrice weekly) is increasingly considered to be safe and less burdensome, but little is known about patients' perspectives. We aimed to describe patients' priorities and concerns regarding incremental HD., Methods: Patients currently, previously, or soon to be receiving HD in Australia participated in two 90-minute online workshops to discuss views about HD focusing on incremental start and priorities for trial outcomes. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Outcomes were ranked on the basis of the sum of participants' priority scores (i.e., single allocation of 3 points for most important, 2 for second, and 1 for third most important outcome)., Results: All 26 participants (1 caregiver and 25 patients) preferred an incremental HD approach. The top prioritized outcomes were quality of life (QOL) (56 points), residual kidney function (RKF) (27 points), and mortality (16 points). The following 4 themes underpinning outcome priorities, experience, and safety concerns were identified: (i) unpreparedness and pressure to adapt, (ii) disruption to daily living, (iii) threats to safety, and (iv) hope and future planning., Conclusion: Patients with kidney failure preferred an incremental start to HD to minimize disruption to daily living and reduce the negative impacts on their education, ability to work, and family life. QOL was the most critically important outcome, followed by RKF and survival., (© 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the International Society of Nephrology.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
59. Nephrologists' Perspectives on Gender Disparities in CKD and Dialysis.
- Author
-
Tong A, Evangelidis N, Kurnikowski A, Lewandowski M, Bretschneider P, Oberbauer R, Baumgart A, Scholes-Robertson N, Stamm T, Carrero JJ, Pecoits-Filho R, and Hecking M
- Abstract
Introduction: Globally, there are more women with chronic kidney disease (CKD), yet they comprise only 40% of patients receiving kidney replacement therapy by dialysis. We aimed to describe the perspectives of nephrologists on gender disparities in access to care and outcomes in CKD and dialysis., Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with 51 nephrologists (28, 55% women) from 22 countries from October 2019 to April 2020. Transcripts were analyzed thematically., Results: We identified 6 themes. Related to women were primary commitment to caregiving (with subthemes of coordinating care, taking charge of health management, deprioritizing own health, centrality of family in decision-making); vigilance and self-reliance (diligence and conscientiousness, stoicism and tolerating symptoms, avoiding burden on family, isolation and coping alone); and stereotyping, stigma, and judgment (body image, dismissed as anxiety, shame and embarrassment, weakness and frailty). Related to men was protecting masculinity (safeguarding the provider role, clinging to control, self-regard, and entitled). Decisional power and ownership included men's dominance in decision-making and women's analytical approach in treatment decisions. Inequities compounded by social disadvantage (financial and transport barriers, without social security, limited literacy, entrenched discrimination, vulnerability) were barriers to care for women, particularly in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities., Conclusion: Nephrologists perceived that women with CKD faced many challenges in accessing care related to social norms and roles of caregiving responsibilities, disempowerment, lack of support, stereotyping by clinicians, and entrenched social and economic disadvantage. Addressing power differences, challenging systemic patriarchy, and managing unconscious bias may help to improve equitable care and outcomes for all people with CKD., (© 2021 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
60. Perspectives on mental health among patients receiving dialysis.
- Author
-
Nataatmadja M, Evangelidis N, Manera KE, Cho Y, Johnson DW, Craig JC, Baumgart A, Hanson CS, Shen J, Guha C, Scholes-Robertson N, and Tong A
- Abstract
Background: Diminished mental health is associated with increased morbidity and mortality and may contribute to loss of independence and motivation in patients receiving dialysis and their caregivers. Increased understanding of the patient perspective on triggers, impacts and strategies for managing mental health may inform ways to address mental health conditions in this population., Methods: A secondary thematic analysis was undertaken using data from the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG)-Hemodialysis and SONG-Peritoneal Dialysis projects. We extracted and analysed data on the perceived causes, meaning, impact and management of mental health in patients receiving dialysis from 26 focus groups (in six countries), multinational Delphi surveys and consensus workshops., Results: A total of 644 patients and caregivers participated. We identified five themes: bound to dialysis (forced into isolation, enslaved to a machine, stress of relentless planning and grieving the loss of a normal life), underrecognized and ignored (missed by health practitioners, need for mental health support), an uncertain future (dreading complications, coming to terms with mortality), developing self-reliance (vulnerability in being solely responsible for dialysis, sustaining motivation for dialysis, necessity for self-vigilance and taking charge to regulate emotions) and responding to a lifestyle overhaul (guilt of burdening family, controlling symptoms for overall mental wellness, protecting independence and trying to feel grateful)., Conclusions: Patients receiving dialysis and their caregivers endure mental and emotional distress attributed to the burden of dialysis, lifestyle restrictions, the constant threat of death and symptom burden, which can impair motivation for self-management. Increased attention to monitoring and management of mental health in this population is needed., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
61. "Can I go to Glasgow?" Learnings from patient involvement at the 17th Congress of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD).
- Author
-
Gutman T, Manera KE, Baumgart A, Johnson DW, Wilkie M, Boudville N, Craig JC, Dong J, Jesudason S, Mehrotra R, Neu A, Shen JI, Van Biesen W, Blake PG, Brunier G, Cho Y, Jefferson N, Lenga I, Mann N, Mendelson AA, Perl J, Sanabria RM, Scholes-Roberston N, Schwartz D, Teitelbaum I, and Tong A
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Internationality, Kidney Diseases psychology, Kidney Diseases therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Nephrology, Attitude of Health Personnel, Biomedical Research, Congresses as Topic, Patient Participation, Peritoneal Dialysis, Societies, Medical
- Abstract
Background: Recognition of the discrepancy between the research priorities of patients and health professionals has prompted efforts to involve patients as active contributors in research activities, including scientific conferences. However, there is limited evidence about the experience, challenges, and impacts of patient involvement to inform best practice. This study aims to describe patient and health professional perspectives on patient involvement at the Congress of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD)., Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 patients/caregivers and 15 health professionals from six countries who attended ISPD. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, and transcripts were analyzed thematically., Results: We identified four themes: protecting and enhancing scientific learning (grounding science in stories, sharing and inspiring new perspectives, distilling the key messages of research presentations, striking a balance between accommodating patients and presenting the science); democratizing access to research (redistributing power, challenging the traditional ownership of knowledge, cultivating self-management through demystifying research); inadequate support for patient/caregiver delegates (lacking purposeful inclusion, challenges in interpreting research findings, soliciting medical advice, difficulty negotiating venue and program, limited financial assistance in attending); and amplifying impact beyond the room (sparking innovation in practice, giving patients and families hope for the future)., Conclusions: Patient involvement at the ISPD Congress clarified the applicability of research to patient care and self-management, democratized science, and strengthened the potential impact of research. More structured support for patients to help them purposefully articulate their experience in relation to session objectives may enhance their contribution and their own learning experience.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.