Search

In the scope of symptom cluster research, few investigators have obtained patients' perceptions of their symptom clusters, even though this information is central to designing effective interventions. In this cross-sectional study, 38 adults with cancer completed measures of demographics, health outcomes (functional status, well-being, quality of life) and a symptom cluster assessment that captured symptom occurrence, severity, distress, clustering, a priority cluster, causal attributions, duration, directional relationships, and cluster interference with daily life. Participants described 72 distinct symptom clusters. Symptoms were most frequently attributed to the cancer diagnosis. Participants' priority symptom cluster typically included two symptoms of continuous duration and one intermittent symptom. Temporal order and direction of symptom relationships varied, with 75 different relationships described among symptom pairs. Greater symptom cluster burden and interference were related to poorer health outcomes. This patient-centered view of symptom clusters revealed substantial variability in symptom cluster characteristics with important implications for symptom management.

It is customary to submit only one portion of a breast cancer to determine if there is amplification or overexpression of the proto-oncogene HER-2/neu. In routine studies of the expression of neu in breast cancer, however, we noted discrepancies in intratumoral positivity. To investigate this phenomenon further, multiple tumor specimens (129 samples) from 41 women with breast cancer were examined. Forty cases were analyzed for neu amplification by slot blot assay and 18 with fluorescent in situ hybridization. Neu overexpression was determined using four different specific antibodies. In more than 50% of cases there were discrepancies in results between the tissue blocks examined. This was evident in both inter- and intra-assay comparisons. It is concluded that intratumoral heterogeneity of neu amplification/overexpression in breast cancer exists to a far greater degree than previously recognized and could be a responsible factor for conflicting published data regarding neu's prognostic significance. Examination of only one tumor sample may not give a true indication of either amplification or overexpression of this oncogene.

Background: Historically, estrogen receptor (ER) determinations have been made by the ligand-binding assay of tumor homogenates, primarily by the dextran-coated charcoal method (DCC). Immunocytochemical assays (ICA) for ER are more recent and have been executed mostly on frozen sections with the monoclonal antibody H222Sp gamma (H222). Lately, new monoclonal antibodies derived by recombinant ER technology have been developed that work well on paraffin embedded, formalin fixed tissue sections. However, there is little information as to whether such assays prognosticate endocrine response., Methods: Using antigen retrieval, the immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody ER1D5, and the streptavidin-biotin detection system, 74 patients with breast cancer in whom endocrine response was known were assayed and the results compared with ER by DCC and ER by ICA in frozen section with H222., Results: ER1D5 in paraffin provided the highest correlation with endocrine response (Kendall's tau [r] = 0.57; P<0.001) whereas ER by DCC failed to correlate (r= -0.002; P<0.99). ER1D5 in paraffin correlated weakly though significantly with DCC (Kappa Statistic [K] = 0.204; P<0.02). H222 in frozen sections also correlated moderately with endocrine response (r = 0.34; P<0.001)., Conclusions: ER can be detected in routine tissue sections processed with antigen retrieval and ER1D5, and can be relied upon to provide accurate prognostic information regarding response to endocrine therapies in breast cancer patients.

Background: Knowledge of androgen receptor (AR) content could help predict hormone response and disease course in prostate cancer. However, determination of AR by biochemical assay is difficult. An immunohistochemical assay (ICA) would solve most difficulties and be especially useful if it could be performed on paraffinized tissue., Experimental Design: AR was studied in paraffin sections from 90 men for whom endocrine response, survival (except one case), and/or biochemical AR was known. After Ag retrieval in a microwave oven, a polyclonal anti-AR Ab was used with the peroxidase antiperoxidase method. Results were semiquantified using a Histoscore (Hscore) and were correlated with biochemistry, endocrine response, and survival., Results: Only 15 patients were AR-negative. AR-ICA did not correlate with biochemistry, Gleason score, stage, or ethnicity but did correlate with endocrine response and survival. The average Histoscore was significantly lower in patients with progressive disease (p < 0.05). In a Cox's regression analysis of survival (mean follow-up = 30 months) AR-ICA was a significant predictor (p = 0.015). Risk of death was 2.5 times greater for a patient with a negative assay compared with one with a positive result., Conclusions: Our data indicate that AR status by ICA may be a useful predictor of survival and endocrine response in prostate cancer. Further studies are needed to confirm these results because the assay could impact significantly on management.

Estrogen receptor immunocytochemistry (ERICA) is favored over dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) or sucrose gradient assay (SGA) by many pathologists and oncologists since it allows an estimation of tumor cell and tissue heterogeneity and permits assays to be performed on specimens not suitable for DCC/SGA. Additionally, ERICA can be performed with greater ease and with less expense at the level of the community hospital pathology laboratory. Initially, like DCC/SGA, ERICA had to be done on fresh or frozen tumor samples or face a significant loss in sensitivity when applied to formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections. Recently, several anti-estrogen receptor (ER) antibodies have appeared which can be successfully employed to assay routinely prepared tissue sections if used in conjunction with new antigen-retrieval techniques such as the microwave oven and citrate buffers. However, more work is needed to correlate results of these new procedures with biochemical ER assays, endocrine response, and survival before they can be reliably employed as prognostic parameters. Furthermore, if any ER assay is to be useful and valid, strict attention must be paid to details of specimen collection, freezing, and fixation in order to inhibit receptor degradation and false negative results.

Twenty-two 1-wk-old broiler chicks (Gallus domesticus) were housed at 16 C and operantly conditioned to activate either a 250-W infrared bulb (control) or a microwave generator delivering 13 mW/cm2 (treated). Plasma corticosterone concentration did not differ between groups (P greater than .05) at 4 wk of age. At that time the birds were killed, and post-mortem examination revealed no treatment differences in gross morphology of the chicks or in weights of spleen and bursa of Fabricius (P greater than .05). Histological study of comparable segments of spleen, bursa, adrenal, and thyroid tissue did not show differences in any of the chosen parameters (P greater than .05). Heterophil:lymphocyte ratios, packed cell volume, and total plasma protein content were similar between groups (P greater than .05). These results suggest that operant exposure to low density microwave radiation did not result in stress or immunological disturbances.