Search

In this study we evaluated the physiological variation of free and total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels to determine how the percent free/total PSA was affected. Twenty four patients had blood drawn for ten consecutive weekdays. The percent coefficient of variation (%CV) of biological variation was calculated. The results were log-normally distributed with geometric means of 12.0% CV, 7.3% CV, and 8.8% CV for free, total, and percent free/total PSA, respectively. When applied, the percent free/total, PSA would need to fluctuate by 31% to indicate that a significant change (critical difference, P<0.05) between two measurements had occurred. Biological variation of PSA measurements is substantial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

All neoplasms require angiogenesis and resulting neovascularity for growth beyond 1 mm2. Quantitative microvessel density (MVD) has been shown to provide staging and prognostic significance in human prostate cancer (CaP). recently, it has been demonstrated that loss of the wild-type allele of the p53 tumour suppressor gene results in reduced expression of thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1), a potent inhibitor of angiogenesis. There is also an increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor which promotes neovascularization. p53 gene mutation and MVD were investigated in men with prostate cancer. Sections from 103 radical prostatectomy cases were evaluated with immunohistochemistry to detect mutant p53 proteins. Quantitative MVD was performed on the cases exhibiting p53 positive staining and compared with negative fields of similar Gleason grade on the same histologic sections. Twenty of the 103 cases (19.4%) revealed positive p53 staining nuclei. In 19 of these 20 cases, the MVD in p53 positive areas was greater than corresponding control regions (overall P<0.0001). Extent of p53 abnormality, as well as MVD, correlated with pathologic stage. These data suggest that mutations of the p53 tumour suppressor gene may be associated with increased angiogenesis in CaP. In addition to providing staging and prognostic information, this relationship potentially has therapeutic implications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Relates a personal viewpoint on the treatment of clinically localized prostatic carcinoma. Reasons for the problem in prostate cancer; Limitations of primary care practice; Account of a clinical experience.

Purpose: A 2-gene, urine based molecular test that combines mRNA biomarkers with clinical factors can risk stratify patients for clinically significant prostate cancer. To ensure the generalizability of assay results we optimized and validated the clinical model for men with serum prostate specific antigen less than 10 ng/ml who were undergoing initial prostate biopsy., Materials and Methods: Urine samples were collected from 1,955 men from The Netherlands, France and Germany prior to an initial prostate biopsy and study subjects were divided into training and validation cohorts. Urinary HOXC6 and DLX1 mRNA levels were quantified and RNA results were then combined with other risk factors in a clinical model optimized to detect ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) Grade Group 2 or greater prostate cancer in men with prostate specific antigen less than 10 ng/ml. Results in the validation cohort were compared with the PCPTRC (Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator), version 2.0., Results: The optimal clinical model included urinary HOXC6 and DLX1 mRNA levels, patient age, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen density (serum prostate specific antigen/prostate volume). In the 715 validation cohort subjects with prostate specific antigen less than 10 ng/ml the AUC was 0.82 with 89% sensitivity, 53% specificity and 95% negative predictive value. The PCPTRC AUC was 0.70. The full validation cohort of 916 men including all prostate specific antigen levels yielded an AUC of 0.85 with 93% sensitivity, 47% specificity and 95% negative predictive value. The PCPTRC AUC was 0.76., Conclusions: The 2-gene based urine assay, which is optimized for biopsy naïve patients with serum prostate specific antigen less than 10 ng/ml, demonstrated high sensitivity and negative predictive value to detect clinically significant prostate cancer. These data support using the test to help guide initial prostate biopsy decisions.

Introduction: There is an unmet need for noninvasive methods to better identify patients at increased risk for clinically significant prostate cancer. SelectMDx® is a molecular urine test validated for the detection of Gleason score 7 and higher cancers (ISUP [International Society of Urological Pathology] Grade Group 2-5). In this multicenter trial we evaluated the test's impact on prostate biopsy decision making in clinical practice., Methods: The study involved 5 U.S. community urology practices which sequentially enrolled 418 patients who received a SelectMDx test between May 2016 and April 2017 while undergoing evaluation for initial prostate biopsy. All tests were ordered by the urologist for patient management. We determined biopsy and prostate cancer detection rates in patients with SelectMDx positive versus SelectMDx negative results., Results: Of the 418 subjects evaluated with SelectMDx 253 (61%) had negative results and 165 (39%) had positive results. Subsequent biopsy rates for SelectMDx positive and negative cases were 60% (99) and 12% (32), respectively (p <0.001). Time from SelectMDx result to biopsy was shorter for those with positive vs negative results (median 2 vs 5 months, p=0.001). Of patients who underwent biopsy within 3 months of testing 71 (43%) with positive results underwent biopsy and 27 had cancers identified, including 10 greater than Grade Group 2. Of 9 patients with SelectMDx negative results (3.6%) who underwent biopsy 4 were diagnosed with cancer, all Grade Group 2 or less., Conclusions: SelectMDx had a significant impact on initial prostate biopsy decision making. Biopsy rates in SelectMDx positive cases were fivefold higher than in SelectMDx negative cases. These results describe the clinical utility of SelectMDx in real-world community urology practice.

Background: Better prostate cancer risk stratification is necessary to inform medical management, especially for African American (AA) men, for whom outcomes are particularly uncertain., Objective: To evaluate the utility of both a cell cycle progression (CCP) score and a clinical cell-cycle risk (CCR) score to predict clinical outcomes in a large cohort of men with prostate cancer highly enriched in an AA patient population., Design, Setting, and Participants: Patients were diagnosed with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate and treated at The Ochsner Clinic (New Orleans, LA, USA) from January 2006 to December 2011. CCP scores were derived from archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded biopsy tissue. CCR scores were calculated as the combination of molecular (CCP score) and clinical (Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment [CAPRA] score) components., Intervention: Active treatment (radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy alone, or radiation and hormone therapy) or watchful waiting., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: The primary outcome was progression to metastatic disease. Association with outcomes was evaluated via Cox proportional hazards survival analysis and likelihood ratio tests., Results and Limitations: The final cohort included 767 men, of whom 281 (36.6%) were AA. After accounting for ancestry, treatment, and CAPRA in multivariable analysis, the CCP score remained a significant predictor of metastatic disease (hazard ratio [HR] 2.04; p<0.001), and there was no interaction with ancestry (p=0.20) or treatment (p=0.09). The CCR score was highly prognostic (HR 3.86; p<0.001), and as with the CCP score, there was no interaction with ancestry (p=0.24) or treatment (p=0.32). Limitations include the retrospective study design and the use of self-reported ancestry information., Conclusions: A CCR score provided significant prognostic information regardless of ancestry. The findings demonstrate that AA men in this study cohort appear to have similar prostate cancer outcomes to non-AA patients after accounting for all available molecular and clinicopathologic variables., Patient Summary: In this study we evaluated the ability of a combined molecular and clinical score to predict the progression of localized prostate cancer. We found that the combined molecular and clinical score predicted progression to metastasis regardless of patient ancestry or treatment. This suggests that the combined molecular and clinical score may be a valuable tool for determining the risk of metastasis in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer in order to make appropriate treatment decisions., (Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: A combined clinical cell-cycle risk (CCR) score that incorporates prognostic molecular and clinical information has been recently developed and validated to improve prostate cancer mortality (PCM) risk stratification over clinical features alone. As clinical features are currently used to select men for active surveillance (AS), we developed and validated a CCR score threshold to improve the identification of men with low-risk disease who are appropriate for AS., Methods: The score threshold was selected based on the 90th percentile of CCR scores among men who might typically be considered for AS based on NCCN low/favorable-intermediate risk criteria (CCR = 0.8). The threshold was validated using 10-year PCM in an unselected, conservatively managed cohort and in the subset of the same cohort after excluding men with high-risk features. The clinical effect was evaluated in a contemporary clinical cohort., Results: In the unselected validation cohort, men with CCR scores below the threshold had a predicted mean 10-year PCM of 2.7%, and the threshold significantly dichotomized low- and high-risk disease (P = 1.2 × 10 -5 ). After excluding high-risk men from the validation cohort, men with CCR scores below the threshold had a predicted mean 10-year PCM of 2.3%, and the threshold significantly dichotomized low- and high-risk disease (P = 0.020). There were no prostate cancer-specific deaths in men with CCR scores below the threshold in either analysis. The proportion of men in the clinical testing cohort identified as candidates for AS was substantially higher using the threshold (68.8%) compared to clinicopathologic features alone (42.6%), while mean 10-year predicted PCM risks remained essentially identical (1.9% vs. 2.0%, respectively)., Conclusions: The CCR score threshold appropriately dichotomized patients into low- and high-risk groups for 10-year PCM, and may enable more appropriate selection of patients for AS., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is a critical need for improved prognostic discrimination in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) given the increasing awareness that some patients may be managed with active surveillance, while others with higher-risk disease might benefit from adjuvant therapy following surgery., Objective: To determine whether a multigene proliferation signature predicts long-term oncologic outcomes in surgically resected RCC., Design, Setting, and Participants: The cell cycle proliferation (CCP) score was determined after radical nephrectomy for localized clear cell, papillary, or chromophobe RCC in 565 patients., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: The primary end point was disease-specific mortality (DSM), and disease recurrence was a secondary end point. Association with outcomes was evaluated by Cox proportional hazards survival analysis. The CCP score was compared with the Karakiewicz nomogram, and a composite (R-CCP) score was developed., Results and Limitations: A total of 68 patients (12%) recurred and 32 (6%) died of disease within 5 yr of nephrectomy. The CCP score was an independent predictor of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-2.09) and DSM (HR 2.49, 95% CI 1.53-4.04) after adjusting for clinical variables using the baseline nomogram. The composite R-CCP score gave a Harrell's concordance index of 0.87 and stratified patients into low- (n=338) and high-risk (n=202) categories with 99% and 84% cancer-specific survival probabilities, respectively (p<0.001)., Conclusions: The CCP score is a significant, independent predictor of long-term oncologic outcomes in patients who have undergone nephrectomy for RCC. Combining the molecular classifier with baseline clinical variables allows for accurate, patient-specific risk assessment for use in guiding clinical management., Patient Summary: In this study, we sought to understand how well gene expression information from individual kidney tumors can predict cancer recurrence and death following surgical removal. We found that the combination of the gene expression test and clinical characteristics provides an accurate prognostic assessment to help inform clinical decisions., (Copyright © 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To determine the prognostic utility of the cell cycle progression (CCP) score in men with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-defined low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP)., Patients and Methods: Men who underwent RP for Gleason score ≤6 PCa at three institutions (Martini Clinic [MC], Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center [DVA] and Intermountain Healthcare [IH]) were identified. The CCP score was obtained from diagnostic (DVA, IH) or simulated biopsies (MC). The primary outcome was biochemical recurrence (BCR; prostate-specific antigen ≥0.2 ng/mL) after RP. The prognostic utility of the CCP score was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models in the subset of men meeting NCCN low-risk criteria and in the overall cohort., Results: Among the 236 men identified, 80% (188/236) met the NCCN low-risk criteria. Five-year BCR-free survival for the low (<0), intermediate (0-1) and high (>1) CCP score groups was 89.2%, 80.4%, 64.7%, respectively, in the low-risk cohort (P = 0.03), and 85.9%, 79.1%, 63.1%, respectively, in the overall cohort (P = 0.041). In multivariable models adjusting for clinical and pathological variables with the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score, the CCP score was an independent predictor of BCR in the low-risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1.77 per unit score, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21, 2.58; P = 0.003) and overall cohorts (HR 1.41 per unit score, 95% CI 1.02, 1.96; P = 0.039)., Conclusion: In a cohort of men with NCCN-defined low-risk PCa, the CCP score improved clinical risk stratification of men who were at increased risk of BCR, which suggests the CCP score could improve the assessment of candidacy for active surveillance and guide optimum treatment selection in these patients with otherwise similar clinical characteristics., (© 2017 The Authors BJU International © 2017 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Determining the optimal treatment for biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is challenging., Objective: We evaluated the ability of CCP score (a prognostic RNA expression signature) to discriminate between systemic disease and local recurrence in patients with BCR after RP., Methods: Sixty patients with BCR after RP were selected for analysis based on: 1) metastatic disease, 2) non-response to salvage external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and 3) durable response to salvage EBRT. CCP scores were generated from the RNA expression of 46 genes. Logistic regression assessed the association between CCP score and patient group., Results: Passing CCP scores were generated for 47 patients with complete clinical and pathologic data. CCP score predicted clinical status when comparing patients with metastatic disease or non-responders to salvage therapy to patients with durable response (p = 0.006). CCP score remained significantly predictive of clinical status after accounting for time to BCR, PSA level at BCR, and Gleason score (p = 0.0031)., Conclusions: Elevated CCP score was associated with increased risk of systemic disease, indicating that CCP score may be useful in identifying patients with BCR who are most likely to benefit from salvage radiation therapy.

Genomic testing may be a vital component in the medical management of patients with complex clinical phenotypes and cancer.

Purpose: The cell cycle progression score is associated with prostate cancer outcomes in various clinical settings. However, previous studies of men treated with radical prostatectomy evaluated cell cycle progression scores generated from resected tumor tissue. We evaluated the prognostic usefulness of the score derived from biopsy specimens in men treated with radical prostatectomy., Materials and Methods: We evaluated the cell cycle progression score in cohorts of patients from the Martini Clinic (283), Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (176) and Intermountain Healthcare (123). The score was derived from simulated biopsy (Martini Clinic) or diagnostic biopsy (Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Intermountain Healthcare) and evaluated for an association with biochemical recurrence and metastatic disease., Results: In all 3 cohorts the cell cycle progression score was associated with biochemical recurrence and metastatic disease. The association with biochemical recurrence remained significant after adjusting for other prognostic clinical variables. On combined analysis of all cohorts (total 582 patients) the score was a strong predictor of biochemical recurrence on univariate analysis (HR per score unit 1.60, 95% CI 1.35-1.90, p=2.4×10(-7)) and multivariate analysis (HR per score unit 1.47, 95% CI 1.23-1.76, p=4.7×10(-5)). Although there were few events (12), the cell cycle progression score was the strongest predictor of metastatic disease on univariate analysis (HR per score unit 5.35, 95% CI 2.89-9.92, p=2.1×10(-8)) and after adjusting for clinical variables (HR per score unit 4.19, 95% CI 2.08-8.45, p=8.2×10(-6))., Conclusions: The cell cycle progression score derived from a biopsy sample was associated with adverse outcomes after surgery. These results indicate that the score can be used at disease diagnosis to better define patient prognosis and enable more appropriate clinical care., (Copyright © 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Modern ultrasound-guided prostate brachytherapy is rapidly changing the way localized prostate cancer is managed. With routine use of prostate-specific antigen screening, prostate cancer is being diagnosed in younger men, who are understandably concerned about the morbidity of radical treatments that may significantly decrease their quality of life. Numerous studies of prostate brachytherapy have shown the excellent disease control rates achieved while maintaining low levels of urinary and erectile difficulties. This report examines a modern implant method of brachytherapy; describes patient selection for brachytherapy, alone and in combination with external beam therapy; and presents results from a series of men followed for 12 years.

Early detection and monitoring by serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement has increased the number of men presenting with potentially curable prostate cancer. Most will choose radical prostatectomy or some form of radiation therapy for treatment, but some will have evidence of biochemical disease recurrence following therapy, shown by a rising PSA level without other clinical evidence of disease. Radical prostatectomy involves the removal of all prostate tissue, causing the serum PSA to decline to undetectable levels within four to six weeks following surgery; a subsequent rise in the serum PSA to a detectable level indicates disease recurrence. Patients should be evaluated to assess whether rising PSA levels indicate local recurrence or early metastatic disease. The advantages of salvage radiation, endocrine therapy, and other treatment modalities in local disease recurrence must be weighed against potential side effects and the resulting decrease in quality of life. Radiation therapy does not immediately eradicate all PSA-producing cells; therefore the persistence of a detectable PSA does not necessarily imply residual cancer, but rising PSA levels indicate treatment failure. Salvage surgery can be performed after radiotherapy for the purpose of removing all viable cancer cells, but should be weighed against a higher incidence of surgical complications; cryoablation offers a less invasive therapeutic modality.

It is well recognized that testosterone has a number of untoward effects on prostatic carcinoma and that castration is associated with significant tumor shrinkage and resolution of symptoms of advanced prostatic carcinoma. Approaches to hormonal therapy have evolved significantly over the last several decades. Initially castration was utilized, which provided effective reduction of testicular androgens, but with adverse psychological factors. The next approach was utilization of diethylstilbestrol, but with significant cardiovascular toxicity in higher doses. The development of the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists provided an improvement in pharmacologic castration; however, they are associated with a transient testosterone surge and the potential for exacerbation of clinical manifestations of advanced prostate carcinoma (the so-called "testosterone flare"). Recently, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists have been investigated. Abarelix is a pure GnRH antagonist that blocks the anterior pituitary receptor, resulting in prompt and significant reduction not only of luteinizing hormone but also follicle-stimulating hormone. This results in castrate levels of testosterone while avoiding the testosterone surge.

The detection of prostate cancer, its clinical staging, and the prediction of its prognosis remain topics of paramount importance in clinical management. The digital rectal exam, although once the "gold standard," has been largely supplanted by a variety of techniques including serum and tissue-based assays. This article reviews recent progress in the development of prostate-specific antigen assays with greater specificity; molecular markers for prostate cancer (DNA ploidy, nuclear morphometry, markers of proliferation, and cell adhesion molecules); the link between vitamin D deficiency and the clinical emergence of prostate cancer; the possible correlation of serum insulin-like growth factor levels with the risk for developing prostate cancer; and the latest advances in radiologic staging.

Among the issues discussed at this year's meeting on prostate cancer in Vail, Colorado, were several that specifically relate to the patient with advanced disease. Dr. E. David Crawford addressed the issue of the timing of hormone therapy, specifically reviewing several important trials that give a glimpse at the potential outcome of aggressive treatment in stage D1.5. The efficacy of antiandrogens, flutamide, bicalutamide, and nilutamide, when combined with chemical or surgical castration, was reviewed. Dr. Arturo Mendoza-Valdes reviewed the rationale behind intermittent (versus continuous) total androgen blockade, especially as related to quality of life. Dr. Paul Miller gave an update on the role of bisphosphonates as adjuvant therapy for prostate cancer. Also discussed was an important new agent for androgen deprivation, Abarelix, a sustained-release GnRH antagonist with low histamine-releasing potential which avoids testosterone and other hormone surge and flare.

The successful treatment of prostate cancer relies on detection of the disease at its earliest stages. Although prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening has been a significant advance in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer, identifying specific genetic alterations in a given family or patient will allow more appropriate screening for early disease. Mapping and identification of specific prostate cancer susceptibility genes is slowly becoming a reality. Other prostate cancer risks include a family history, race, and possibly serum markers such as insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I). Once a high-risk man is identified, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies are the standard to diagnose prostate cancer. Although TRUS is an advance over traditional digitally directed biopsies, it represents a random sampling of the prostate since most lesions cannot be visualized. Newer modalities such as ultrasound contrast agents, pattern recognition, and artificial neural networks (ANNs), applied to TRUS images, may improve diagnostic accuracy. If a man at risk for prostate cancer has undergone a negative TRUS biopsy, the decision for the need for additional biopsies is problematic. Use of PSA derivatives such as free and total PSA and the initial biopsy abnormalities such as atypia or high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia may define those patients in need of follow-up biopsy.

Prostate cancer has generated more debate over the last decade than perhaps any other malignancy. This stems from many factors, not the least of which is the fact that the histologic incidence far exceeds clinically manifested disease. Despite this fact, prostate cancer remains the most common male malignancy and the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality in most Western societies. Significant advances have occurred in virtually all domains surrounding prostate cancer, including increased understanding of the molecular and genetic basis of the disease, improved methods of early detection and screening, refinement of biopsy techniques, and advances in staging and therapeutic approaches. Even with these advances, the sobering mortality statistics clearly underscore the need for further insight and progress.

Purpose: Determining serum total prostate specific antigen (PSA) has proved to be a valuable diagnostic aid for detecting prostatic carcinoma, although the lack of specificity has limited its usefulness. Studies indicate that the use of percent free PSA would improve specificity while maintaining sensitivity. Since complexed PSA represents the major proportion of measurable PSA in serum, we determined whether it represents a single test alternative to the use of percent free PSA for the early detection of prostate cancer., Materials and Methods: Archival serum was obtained from 385 men with no evidence of malignancy on biopsy and 272 with biopsy confirmed prostate cancer. We determined the concentration and proportion of total, complexed and free PSA., Results: Receiver operating characteristics analysis using total PSA results from all samples (range 0.32 to 117 ng./ml.) indicated that the areas under the curve for complexed PSA alone as well as the free-to-total and complexed-to-total PSA ratios were similar and significantly greater than those for total PSA alone. Within the range of 85% to 95% sensitivity receiver operating characteristics analysis revealed that the specificity of complexed PSA was higher than that of total PSA and equivalent to that of the free-to-total PSA ratio. We noted a similar improvement in specificity in the 4 to 10 ng./ml. total PSA range. Using published cutoff values for complexed, total and percent free PSA when total PSA was in the 4 to 10 ng./ml. range the sensitivity and specificity of complexed and percent free PSA were similar. Within the 4 to 10 ng./ml. total PSA range the population of patients with no evidence of malignancy and complexed PSA below the upper limit was different with respect to total PSA from that with no evidence of malignancy and free PSA greater than 25%., Conclusions: The measurement of complexed PSA represents an alternative to the use of percent free PSA, although the patient populations identified by the 2 tests are different.

Background: Multiple serum tests were performed on archival samples from patients who participated in trials to assess the ProstaScint scan staging ability. Traditional statistical analysis as well as artificial neural network (ANN) analysis were employed to evaluate individual patients and the group as a whole. The results were evaluated so that each factor was tested for prognostic value., Methods: Data obtained from serum tests, bone scans, and ProstaScint scans were evaluated by traditional statistical methods and ANN to determine the individual value in clinical staging of prostate cancer., Results: Two hundred seventy-five patients (180 postprostatectomy, 95 intact prostate) with prostate cancer (14 with distant metastases) were available for analysis. Data available included: clinical state (remission or progression), most recent clinical TNM stage, bone scan, and ProstaScint scan. Serum was tested for prostate-specific membrane antigen(PSMA), prostate-specific antigen(PSA), free PSA (fPSA), and complexed PSA (cPSA). Additional calculations included percent free PSA, and percent complexed PSA. Spearman individual statistical assessment for traditional group evaluation revealed no significant factors for T-stage. The free PSA and complex PSA had a significant association with node (N)-status. The distant metastases (M) stage correlated well with the bone scan and clinical stage. ANN analysis revealed no significant T-stage factors. N-stage factors showed a 95% sensitivity and 49% specificity. These factors included the presence or absence of a prostate, PSA serum levels, bone scan, and ProstaScint scans as major associated indicators. ANN analysis of the important variables for M-stage included ProstaScint scan score, and PSA levels (total, percent complexed, percent free, and fPSA). These factors were associated with a 95% sensitivity and 15% specificity level., Conclusions: Two hundred seventy-five patients receiving treatment for prostate cancer were evaluated by ANN and traditional statistical analysis for factors related to stage of disease. ANN revealed that PSA levels, determined by a variety of ways, ProstaScint scan, and bone scan, were significant variables that had prognostic value in determining the likelihood of nodal disease, or distant disease in prostate cancer patients., (Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

The challenge continues-to find better methods of screening for prostate cancer, of determining who should undergo needle biopsy, and of predicting who will fail initial therapy. Investigators are looking at the value of neural networks and an array of markers to provide improved screening and prognostic information.

Screening for prostate cancer has shown great promise in its ability to detect prostate cancer at a curable stage; however, significant problems exist with respect to our knowledge of its impact on prostate cancer mortality. For the properly informed patient with at least a 10-year life expectancy, it would seem that early detection efforts utilizing digital rectal examination (DRE) and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) determination are beneficial. Considerable controversy abounds about early detection and screening and will continue until definitive proof of decreased prostate cancer mortality as a result of effective early detection and treatment regimens is demonstrated. Until then, all men with at least a 10-year life expectancy should be counseled as to the potential benefits and risks. The salient literature is reviewed and commentary made as to the benefits of screening methods that can be invoked as well as their limitations and potential liabilities., (Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has revolutionized the diagnosis and management of men with prostate cancer. Significant advances have been made since the early development of immunoassays. While PSA is useful for staging and monitoring of established disease, it has shown the greatest utility in the realm of early detection realm. PSA is the most important tumor marker; its importance in evaluating men for the possibility of prostate cancer is irrefutable. Enhancing specificity is a pressing need. In this regard, the recognition of the molecular forms of free PSA and complex PSA have shown the most promise and undoubtedly will result in fewer false-positive PSA test results. The salient literature is reviewed and commentary made on the current status of PSA with particular emphasis on methods to enhance its specificity in early detection and applications., (Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Serum prostate-specific antigen is credited with dramatic advances in the early detection, screening, and management of men with prostatic carcinoma. There has been more than a twofold increase in the number of men diagnosed during the last decade, and prostate cancer has emerged as the most common non-skin cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in men. This report summarizes the history and current status of prostate-specific antigen and other serum markers, incorporating consensus opinions from the Second International Consultation on Prostate Cancer held in Paris in June 1999.

Purpose: Prostate specific antigen (PSA) exists in bound (complexed) and unbound (free) forms in serum. The percentage of free PSA enhances the specificity of PSA testing for prostate cancer detection. We evaluated the use of percent free PSA preoperatively to predict pathological stage., Materials and Methods: A total of 379 men with prostate cancer and 394 with benign prostatic disease 50 to 75 years old were enrolled in this prospective study at 7 medical centers. All subjects had a palpably benign prostate gland, serum PSA 4.0 to 10.0 ng./ml. and a histologically confirmed diagnosis. The Hybritech Tandem PSA and free PSA assays were used. Of the 379 cancer patients 268 (71%) underwent radical prostatectomy., Results: Higher percent free PSA levels were associated with more favorable histopathological findings in prostatectomy specimens. A value of 15% free PSA provided the greatest discrimination in predicting favorable pathological outcome. Organ confined cancer, Gleason sum less than 7 and small tumors (10% or less involvement of the prostate) were noted in 75% of patients with greater than 15% and only 34% with 15% or less free PSA (p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed percent free PSA to be the strongest predictor of postoperative pathological outcome (odds ratio 2.25), followed by biopsy Gleason sum (2.06) and patient age (1.35). Total PSA was not predictive in this cohort but has been shown in prior studies to be predictive of outcome when a broader range of PSA values is evaluated., Conclusions: Percent free PSA may be used for risk assessment of the presence (diagnosis) and stage of prostate cancer in men with PSA between 4 and 10 ng./ml. Percent free PSA may be combined with PSA, digital rectal examination and biopsy findings to help predict postoperative pathological stage and grade, and may assist the patient and physician in making more informed treatment decisions.

Most studies do not support an association between vasectomy and prostate cancer, but a few have suggested a link. Vasectomy is a common birth control method, and prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed solid tumor in men, making this a major public health question. This study was specifically designed to determine whether or not vasectomy is associated with risk of prostate cancer. To examine this issue, we conducted a population-based case-control study in King County, Washington. Interviews were completed with men ages 40-64 years newly diagnosed with prostate cancer between January 1993 and December 1996 who were ascertained through the Seattle-Puget Sound Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry (n = 753) and with comparison men without prostate cancer identified from the same general population (n = 703). The odds ratio (OR) for prostate cancer in relation to vasectomy was assessed. The prevalence of vasectomy was similar in cases (39.4%) and controls (37.7%), resulting in no association (adjusted OR, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-1.4). There was no consistent evidence that risk varied by the age at which vasectomy was performed, the time since vasectomy, or the calendar period when the vasectomy was performed. The OR in relation to vasectomy was higher in men with less aggressive prostate cancer. Risk estimates did not differ according to age, race, or family history of prostate cancer. This study suggests that vasectomy is not associated with the risk of developing prostate cancer. It also provides evidence that vasectomized men may be more likely to present with earlier-stage, lower-grade prostate tumors.

Background: Medical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) giving rise to lower urinary tract symptomatology (LUTS) has emerged as the mainstay for first-line therapy. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the most important method of detecting prostate carcinoma. The effect of finasteride on PSA has been widely reported. Little data exist with respect to alpha-adrenergic blocking therapy in men treated for BPH. In the present investigation we set out to evaluate the effect of these two forms of therapy., Methods: Patients enrolled in the VA Cooperative Study #359 trial were evaluated. This study evaluated men with moderate LUTS owing to BPH in four treatment groups: placebo (P), finasteride (F), terazosin (T), and combination of finasteride plus terazosin (C). Men were recruited at 31 VA medical centers and had a baseline in 52-week PSA determination at the respective sites., Results: There was no significant difference in baseline PSA between four groups (mean range, 2.0-2.9 ng/ml). Statistically significant reduction in PSA levels was observed at 52 weeks in the F and C arms (P < 0.001), whereas significant increases were observed in the T and P arms (P < 0.01). Additionally, there was no significant difference in PSA response between the T and P arms. Thirty percent of men in the C or F arms had more than 40-60% reduction of PSA. In contrast, the majority of men on T or P had less than 40% change in PSA. Only 35% of men on F or C had the expected 40-60% reduction in PSA level., Conclusions: These data demonstrate no clinically significant effect of T on PSA level. The heterogeneity of PSA response to F may make monitoring patients for the development of prostate cancer problematic.

Background: Numerous studies on prostatic disease have been performed at Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Centers. Recent investigations evaluating early detection of prostate cancer provide insight that the average prostate volume may be different between patients with similar clinical findings who are from different hospital settings. The objective of this study was to compare prostate size between men from University and VA Medical Centers., Methods: Patients were enrolled retrospectively from 1989-1996 from the Urology Clinics at a University and a VA Medical Center. All men underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsy of the prostate owing to either an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) detected prior to biopsy. Prostate volume was calculated using the ellipsoid three-diameter formula based on transrectal ultrasound measurements., Results: There were 1,311 men included in the analysis: 717 were from the VA, and 594 were from the University. The average prostate volume was significantly smaller among VA patients both for men with cancer (P = 0.0004) and for men with no evidence of malignancy (P < 0.0001). Overall, the average prostate volume was 38.5 cm3 (median, 32.5 cm3) among men from the VA compared to 46.8 cm3 (median, 39.3 cm3) among men from the University Medical Center. Men from the VA were older (mean +/- SD = 68 +/- 7.3) than men from the University (mean +/- SD = 66 +/- 7.7) (P = 0.004) and there was no significant difference in PSA levels between the two groups of patients (P = 0.11). Intriguingly, the incidence of cancer was significantly lower at the VA (24.5%) compared to the University (35.9%) (P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: The variance in prostate size suggests that there are significant differences between the two patient populations. Proposed factors leading to this discrepancy include differences in socioeconomic factors, environmental factors, and changes in hormonal milieu related to alcohol and tobacco use. These results may have significant implications regarding the interpretation and extrapolation of results from previous studies performed at a single hospital setting.

Using data from a case-control study conducted in Group Health Cooperative (GHC) of Puget Sound, we examined the relation between the use of electric blankets or heated water beds and the risk of prostate cancer. Cases were 175 prostate cancer patients ages 40-69 years. Controls were 258 male GHC members frequency matched to cases. The odds ratio (OR) for prostate cancer associated with the use of an electric blanket or heated water bed was 1.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9-2.2). The risk, however, did not tend to be higher with increasing months per year or years of use. This study did not provide clear evidence on the hypothesized association.