Search

Since the discovery of copper induces cell death(cuprotosis) in 2022, it has been one of the biggest research hotspots. cuprotosis related genes (CRGs) has been demonstrated to be a potential therapeutic target for cancer, however, the molecular mechanism of CRGs in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infected in DLBCL patients has not been reported yet. Therefore, our research objective is first to elucidate the mechanism and role of CRGs in COVID-19. Secondly, we conducted univariate and multivariate analysis and machine learning to screen for CRGs with common expression differences in COVID-19 and DLBCL. Finally, the functional role and immune mechanism of genes in DLBCL were confirmed through cell experiments and immune analysis. The research results show that CRGs play an important role in the occurrence and development of COVID-19. Univariate analysis and machine learning confirm that dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (DLD) is the common key gene of COVID-19 and DLBCL. Inhibiting the expression of DLD can significantly inhibit the cycle progression and promote cell apoptosis of DLBCL cells and can target positive regulation of Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1, also known as KDM1A) to inhibit the proliferation of DLBCL cells and promote cell apoptosis. The immune analysis results show that high-expression of DLD may reduce T cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity by regulating immune infiltration of CD8 + T cells and positively regulating immune checkpoints LAG3 and CD276. Reducing the expression of DLD can effectively enhance T cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity, thereby clearing cancer cells and preventing cancer growth. In conclusion, DLD may be a potential therapeutic target for COVID-19 infection in DLBCL patients. Our research provides a theoretical basis for improving the clinical treatment of COVID-19 infection in DLBCL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a rapid, exponential increase in hospitalizations and morbidity/mortality. In November 2020, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) permitting administration of the first monoclonal antibodies (mAb) for outpatient treatment of COVID-19. Early data showed a reduction in COVID-19-related hospitalizations with few adverse events. However, since these treatments are only authorized under an EUA, real-world data are minimal. Objective: To assess efficacy and safety of mAbs in a veteran population. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed veterans at the Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Health Care System with mild-moderate COVID-19 and screened for mAb eligibility between December 1, 2020, and October 31, 2021. The primary outcome was hospitalizations and/or emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and post-COVID-19 conditions. Adverse events were also evaluated. Outcomes were compared between mAb-treated patients and eligible veterans who were not treated. Results: There were 296 and 275 veterans in the mAb and control groups, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found for the primary outcome overall (25.7% vs 25.1%; P = 0.87), nor for COVID-19-related return visits or hospitalizations (13.9% v. 16%; P = 0.4). However, the mAb group had more return ED visits (P = 0.35), and the control group had significantly more hospitalizations (P = 0.02). Vaccinated veterans who received an mAb had fewer return visits and hospitalizations (P = 0.01). More mAb-treated veterans experienced post-COVID-19 conditions. No difference in mortality was found. Four nonsevere adverse events occurred after the mAb therapy. Conclusion and relevance: Overall, the mAbs appeared safe and effective. Sicker, higher-risk mAb-treated veterans faired similarly to less-sick, high-risk veterans not treated. Those who were vaccinated seemed to benefit the most from mAb therapy. Future prospective studies with more matched groups are needed to assess full benefits and risks of mAbs shown to neutralize the predominant variants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) are fundamental to many critical biological processes and are crucial in mediating essential cellular functions across diverse organisms, including bacteria, parasites, and viruses. A notable example is the interaction between the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein and the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2), which initiates a series of events leading to viral replication. Interrupting this interaction offers a promising strategy for blocking or significantly reducing infection, highlighting its potential as a target for anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapies. This review focuses on the hACE2 and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein interaction, exemplifying the latest advancements in peptide-based strategies for developing PPI inhibitors. We discuss various approaches for creating peptide-based inhibitors that target this critical interaction, aiming to provide potential treatments for COVID-19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Successful medical treatment for patients with COVID-19 requires rapid and accurate diagnosis. Fighting the COVID-19 pandemic requires an automated system to diagnose the virus on Chest X-Ray (CXR) images. CXR images are frequently used in healthcare as they offer the potential for rapid and accurate disease diagnosis. SARS-CoV-2 targets the respiratory system, resulting in pneumonia with additional symptoms, such as dry cough, fatigue, and fever, which could be misdiagnosed as pneumonia, TB, or lung cancer. There is difficulty in differentiating the features of COVID-19 from other diseases that have similarities in CXR images. Automated Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) systems incorporate machine or deep learning methods to improve efficiency and accuracy. CNNs are among the most widely used methods, as they have shown encouraging accuracy in identifying COVID-19 in CXR images. This study presents a hybrid deep learning model to provide faster diagnosis of COVID-19 infection using CXR images. The Densenet201 model was used for feature extraction and a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) was used for classification. The proposed method achieved 98.82 % accuracy and similar sensitivity, specificity, precision, recall, and F1 score. These results are promising when compared to other DL models trained in similar datasets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fracture healing is a process in which many factors interact. In addition to many treatments, physical and biological therapy methods that affect different steps of this process, there are many biological and chemical agents that cause fracture union delay. Although the number of studies on fracture healing is increasing day by day, the mechanism of fracture healing, which is not fully understood, still attracts the attention of all researchers. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of favipiravir and hydroxychloroquine used in the treatment of COVID-19. In this study, 48 male Wistar rats weighing 300 ± 50 g were used. Each group was divided into eight subgroups of six rats each to be sacrificed at the 2nd and 4th weeks and evaluated radiologically and histologically. Favipiravir (group 1), hydroxychloroquine (group 2), favipiravir + hydroxychloroquine (group 3), and random control (group 4) were used. A statistically significant difference was observed between the 15th day histological scoring averages of the groups (p < 0.05). Although there was no statistically significant difference between the 15th day radiological score distributions of the groups (p > 0.05), we obtained different results in terms of complete bone union distributions and radiological images of the fracture line. Although favipiravir has a negative effect on fracture union in the early period, favipiravir may have a positive effect on fracture union in the late period. We did not find any effect of hydroxychloroquine on fracture union. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak, which causes COVID-19, had a devastating impact on both people's lives and the global economy. During the course of the pandemic, the lack of specific drugs or treatments tailored for COVID-19 led to extensive repurposing of existing drugs in the pursuit of effective treatments. Some drug molecules demonstrated efficacy, while others proved ineffective. In this context, the approach of drug repurposing emerged as a novel strategy for combating COVID-19. Repurposed drugs and biologics have shown effectiveness, leading to improved clinical outcomes among patients with COVID-19. Similarly, It is equally important to assess the risk–benefit ratio associated with drugs and biologics adapted for COVID-19 treatment. Herein, we primarily focus on evaluating adverse drug events linked to repurposed COVID-19 medications, repurposed biologics, and COVID-specific drug molecules. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, a new oral antiviral called nirmatrelvirritonavir (PaxlovidTM) was authorized for use in Canada in January 2022. In vitro studies have reported mutations in Mpro protein that may be associated with the development of nirmatrelvir resistance. Objectives: To survey the prevalence, relevance and temporal patterns of Mpro mutations among SARS-CoV-2 Omicron lineages in Ontario, Canada. Methods: A total of 93,082 Mpro gene sequences from December 2021 to September 2023 were analyzed. Reported in vitro Mpro mutations were screened against our database using in-house data science pipelines to determine the nirmatrelvir resistance. Negative binomial regression was conducted to analyze the temporal trends in Mpro mutation counts over the study time period. Results: A declining trend was observed in non-synonymous mutations of Mpro sequences, showing a 7.9% reduction (95% CI: 6.5%--9.4%; p<0.001) every 30 days. The P132H was the most prevalent mutation (higher than 95%) in all Omicron lineages. In vitro nirmatrelvir-resistant mutations were found in 3.12% (n=29/929) Omicron lineages with very low counts, ranging from one to 19. Only two mutations, A7T (n=19) and M82I (n=9), showed temporal presence among the BA.1.1 in 2022 and the BQ.1.2.3 in 2022, respectively. Conclusion: The observations suggest that, as of September 2023, no significant or widespread resistance to nirmatrelvir has developed among SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants in Ontario. This study highlights the importance of creating automated monitoring systems to track the emergence of nirmatrelvir-resistant mutations within the SARS-CoV-2 virus, utilizing genomic data generated in real-time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The ongoing Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a profound impact on the global healthcare system. As the SARS-CoV-2 virus, responsible for this pandemic, continues to spread and develop mutations in its genetic material, new variants of interest (VOIs) and variants of concern (VOCs) are emerging. These outbreaks lead to a decrease in the efficacy of existing treatments such as vaccines or drugs, highlighting the urgency of new therapies for COVID-19. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to identify potential SARS-CoV-2 antivirals using a virtual screening protocol and molecular dynamics simulations. These techniques allowed us to predict the binding affinity of a database of compounds with the virus Mpro protein. This in silico approach enabled us to identify twenty-two chemical structures from a public database (QSAR Toolbox Ver 4.5) and ten promising molecules from our in-house database. The latter molecules possess advantageous qualities, such as two-step synthesis, cost-effectiveness, and long-lasting physical and chemical stability. Consequently, these molecules can be considered as promising alternatives to combat emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To better understand the struggles drug court participants face and their relationship to graduation status, we took freehand notes during observations of staff meetings (N = 119) and court dockets (N = 147) and used thematic analysis to examine the notations. Themes included participants' ongoing mental and physical health issues, legal issues outside of drug court, experience with both prosocial and antisocial relationships, drug use by family and friends, and a variety of treatment barriers even in a program designed to mitigate these. We expected ongoing legal issues outside of drug court, physical and mental health struggles, and family and friends being supportive, or not, to be related to graduation but they were not. However, COVID-19 and treatment barriers were significantly related to graduation status. Results add to the scholarly literature, especially that focusing on justice and court processes post-COVID-19, and can assist practitioners in understanding what factors may need more attention and resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Convalescent plasma (CP) collected from people who recovered from COVID-19 became a rapidly available treatment modality in numerous countries, including the Czech Republic. The aims of our study were to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CP in the treatment of COVID-19. Methods: This retrospective observational study involved six Czech hospitals. This study enrolled patients with and without CP treatment who were hospitalized between April 2020 and April 2021. Propensity score matching and logistic regression analysis were performed to evaluate the influence of CP administration and its timing on the in-hospital survival of COVID-19 patients. Results: A total of 1,498 patients were enrolled in the study; 406 (27%) were administered CP, and 1,092 (73%) were not treated with CP. The propensity score-matched control group consisted of 1,218 subjects. The survival of patients treated with CP was 79%, while that of patients in the matched control group was 62% (P<0.001). Moreover, the chance of survival was significantly greater when CP was administered within three days after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms than when CP was administered after four or more days (87% vs. 76%, P <0.001). In addition, adverse effects related to CP administration were recorded in only 2% of patients and were considered mild in all patients. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the administration of CP was safe and possibly associated with positive effects that were more pronounced if CP was administered within the first three days after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in critical cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and associated with worse outcome. Dysregulated neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation is one of several suggested pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the development of COVID-19 associated AKI. The corticosteroid dexamethasone was implemented as a standard treatment for severe COVID-19 as of June 2020. A sub-analysis of a prospective observational single center study was performed to evaluate the effect of corticosteroid treatment on AKI development and NET markers in critical cases of COVID-19. Results: Two hundred and ten adult patients admitted to intensive care at a tertiary level hospital due to respiratory failure or shock secondary to SARS-CoV-2-infection between March 13th 2020 and January 14th 2021 were included in the study. Ninety-seven of those did not receive corticosteroids. One hundred and thirteen patients were treated with corticosteroids [dexamethasone (n = 98) or equivalent treatment (n = 15)], but the incidence of AKI was assessed only in patients that received corticosteroids before any registered renal dysfunction (n = 63). Corticosteroids were associated with a lower incidence of AKI (19% vs 55.8%, p < 0.001). Fewer patients demonstrated detectable concentrations of extracellular histones in plasma when treated with corticosteroids (8.7% vs 43.1%; p < 0.001). Extracellular histones and in particular non-proteolyzed histones were observed more frequently with increasing AKI severity (p < 0.001). MPO-DNA was found in lower concentrations in patients that received corticosteroids before established renal dysfunction (p = 0.03) and was found in higher concentrations in patients with AKI stage 3 (p = 0.03). Corticosteroids did not ameliorate established AKI during the first week of treatment. Conclusion: Corticosteroid treatment in severe COVID-19 is associated with a lower incidence of AKI and reduced concentrations of NET markers in plasma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Precision medicine has led to the development of targeted treatment strategies tailored to individual patients based on their characteristics and disease manifestations. Although precision medicine often focuses on a single health outcome for individualized treatment decision rules (ITRs), relying only on a single outcome rather than all available outcomes information leads to suboptimal data usage when developing optimal ITRs. Methods: To address this limitation, we propose a Bayesian multivariate hierarchical model that leverages the wealth of correlated health outcomes collected in clinical trials. The approach jointly models mixed types of correlated outcomes, facilitating the "borrowing of information" across the multivariate outcomes, and results in a more accurate estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects compared to using single regression models for each outcome. We develop a treatment benefit index, which quantifies the relative benefit of the experimental treatment over the control treatment, based on the proposed multivariate outcome model. Results: We demonstrate the strengths of the proposed approach through extensive simulations and an application to an international Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment trial. Simulation results indicate that the proposed method reduces the occurrence of erroneous treatment decisions compared to a single regression model for a single health outcome. Additionally, the sensitivity analyses demonstrate the robustness of the model across various study scenarios. Application of the method to the COVID-19 trial exhibits improvements in estimating the individual-level treatment efficacy (indicated by narrower credible intervals for odds ratios) and optimal ITRs. Conclusion: The study jointly models mixed types of outcomes in the context of developing ITRs. By considering multiple health outcomes, the proposed approach can advance the development of more effective and reliable personalized treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The inhibition of heat shock protein 90 (HSP90), a molecular chaperone, has been proposed to be a potential novel treatment strategy for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In contrast to other studies, our data demonstrated that RGRN-305, a HSP90 inhibitor, exacerbated the cytopathic effect and did not reduce the viral shedding in VeroE6-hTMPRSS2 cells infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Likewise in a murine model of SARS-CoV-2, transgenic mice treated orally with RGRN-305 exhibited reduced survival by the end of the experiment (day 12) as 14% (1/7) survived compared to 63% (5/8) of those treated with drug-vehicle. Animal weight was not reduced by the RGRN-305 treatment. Interestingly, we demonstrated that inhibition of HSP90 by RGRN-305 significantly dampened the inflammatory response induced by SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in human macrophage-like cells (U937) and human lung epithelial cells (A549). Measured by quantitative real-time PCR, the mRNA expression of the proinflammatory cytokines TNF, IL1B and IL6 were significantly reduced. Together, these data suggest that HSP90 inhibition by RGRN-305 exacerbates the SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro and reduces the survival of mice infected with SARS-CoV-2, but exhibits strong anti-inflammatory properties. This data shows that while RGRN-305 may be helpful in a 'cytokine storm', it has no beneficial impact on viral replication or survival in animals as a monotherapy. Further animal studies with HSP90 inhibitors in combination with an anti-viral drug may provide additional insights into its utility in viral infections and whether HSP90 inhibition may continue to be a potential treatment strategy for COVID-19 disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: When Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) struck the world in December 2019, initiatives started to investigate the efficacy of convalescent plasma, a readily available source of passive antibodies, collected from recovered patients as a therapeutic option. This was based on historical observational data from previous virus outbreaks. Methods: A scoping review was conducted on the efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma and hyperimmune immunoglobulins for COVID-19 treatment. This review included the latest Cochrane systematic review update on 30-day mortality and safety. We also covered use in pediatric and immunocompromised patients, as well as the logistic challenges faced in donor recruitment and plasma collection in general. Challenges for low resource countries were specifically highlighted. Results: A major challenge is the high donation frequency required from firsttime donors to ensure a safe product, which minimizes the risk of transfusiontransmitted infectious. This is particularly difficult in low- and middle-income countries due to inadequate infrastructure and insufficient blood product supplies. High-certainty evidence indicates that convalescent plasma does not reduce mortality or significantly improve clinical outcomes in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 infection. However, CCP may provide a viable treatment for patients unable to mount an endogenous immune response to SARS-CoV-2, based on mostly observational studies and subgroup data of published and ongoing randomized trials. Convalescent plasma has been shown to be safe in adults and children with COVID-19 infection. However, the efficacy in pediatric patients remains unclear. Discussion: Data on efficacy and safety of CCP are still underway in ongoing (randomized) studies and by reporting the challenges, limitations and successes encountered to-date, research gaps were identified to be addressed for the future. Conclusion: This experience serves as a valuable example for future pandemic preparedness, particularly when therapeutic options are limited, and vaccines are either being developed or ineffective due to underlying immunosuppression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized the administration of ritonavir (RIT)-boosted nirmatrelvir (NMV) on May 25, 2023, for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 in patients who are at high risk of developing severe COVID-19. In accordance with sustainability and environmental friendliness, simple, eco-friendly, and sustainable spectrophotometric methods were established for concurrently estimating RIT and NMV in newly launched copackaged pills. The suggested solutions for resolving the spectral overlap between RIT and NMV involve the following mathematical methods: the first derivative method (1D), second derivative method (2D), and dual-wavelength zero-order method (DWZ). When ethanol was used as a green dilution solvent, the linearity range was adjusted (10–250 µg/mL) for both drugs. The procedures resulted in a high correlation coefficient (not less than 0.9996) and satisfactory levels of detection and quantification. Additionally, method validation was performed in accordance with International Council for Harmonization norms. Moreover, a detailed ecological and sustainability evaluation protocol was established to confirm the greenness and whiteness of the methods. Finally, the proposed method, along with previously reported methods for analysing NMV and RIT, were reviewed analytically and ecologically. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study explores an epidemic model elucidating the dynamics of COVID-19 transmission amidst vaccination and saturated treatment interventions. The investigation encompasses both deterministic and stochastic frameworks, considering constant and fluctuating environments, utilizing COVID-19 data from India for empirical validation. Through rigorous mathematical and numerical analyses, we ascertain pivotal insights. Our deterministic model unveils a critical phenomenon: the occurrence of backward bifurcation at ℛ0 = 1, underscoring that merely reducing the basic reproduction number below unity does not ensure disease eradication. Sensitivity analyses underscore the acceleration of epidemic spread with higher transmission rates, yet mitigation measures such as vaccination and comprehensive treatment can effectively reduce the basic reproduction number below unity. Within the stochastic framework, we establish the existence of a unique global positive solution. We delineate conditions for disease extinction or persistence and identify criteria for the emergence of stationary distribution, reflecting the sustained presence of infection within the community. Our findings elucidate that while smaller noise intensities sustain disease prevalence, heightened noise levels lead to complete eradication of the infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Long COVID covers many cardio-pulmonary symptoms, worsening individuals' health status. Health resort treatment applies balneological factors, physical medicine modalities, climate actions, and exercises that may be beneficial for COVID-19 survivors. This study aimed to assess the severity of the cardiopulmonary symptoms in people qualified for health resort treatment and its efficacy in this group of patients. Methods: Medical records of 239 people attending health resort treatment were analysed. A total of 122 people (71 women and 51 men) with a mean age of 64.35 years ± 8.66 years were enrolled in the analysis. The cardiopulmonary symptoms of long COVID were assessed twice: before and after health resort treatment. Results: Persisting COVID-19 symptoms do not differentiate between women and men. Health resort treatment reduces symptoms severity in both sexes. Age does not mediate the efficacy of health resort treatment. Conclusions: The persistent symptoms of COVID-19 are of low intensity in people qualified for health resort treatment and are independent of gender. Health resort treatment effectively mitigates dyspnoea, tightness of chest, and sputum in long COVID patients, so it should be implemented into the standard treatment course for COVID-19 survivors as a continuation of therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is a complex interplay between viral infection and host innate immune response regarding disease severity and outcomes. Neutrophil hyperactivation, including excessive release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), is linked to exacerbated disease in acute COVID-19, notably in hospitalized patients. Delineating protective versus detrimental neutrophil responses is essential to developing targeted COVID-19 therapies and relies on high-quality translational animal models. In this study, we utilize a previously established feline model for COVID-19 to investigate neutrophil dysfunction in which experimentally infected cats develop clinical disease that mimics acute COVID-19. Specific pathogen-free cats were inoculated with SARS-CoV-2 (B.1.617.2; Delta variant) (n = 24) or vehicle (n = 6). Plasma, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and lung tissues were collected at various time points over 12 days post-inoculation. Systematic and temporal evaluation of the kinetics of neutrophil activation was conducted by measuring markers of activation including myeloperoxidase (MPO), neutrophil elastase (NE), and citrullinated histone H3 (citH3) in SARS-CoV-2-infected cats at 4 and 12 days post-inoculation (dpi) and compared to vehicle-inoculated controls. Cytokine profiling supported elevated innate inflammatory responses with specific upregulation of neutrophil activation and NET formation-related markers, namely IL-8, IL-18, CXCL1, and SDF-1, in infected cats. An increase in MPO-DNA complexes and cell-free dsDNA in infected cats compared to vehicle-inoculated was noted and supported by histopathologic severity in respiratory tissues. Immunofluorescence analyses further supported correlation of NET markers with tissue damage, especially 4 dpi. Differential gene expression analyses indicated an upregulation of genes associated with innate immune and neutrophil activation pathways. Transcripts involved in activation and NETosis pathways were upregulated by 4 dpi and downregulated by 12 dpi, suggesting peak activation of neutrophils and NET-associated markers in the early acute stages of infection. Correlation analyses conducted between NET-specific markers and clinical scores as well as histopathologic scores support association between neutrophil activation and disease severity during SARS-CoV-2 infection in this model. Overall, this study emphasizes the effect of neutrophil activation and NET release in SARS-CoV-2 infection in a feline model, prompting further investigation into therapeutic strategies aimed at mitigating excessive innate inflammatory responses in COVID-19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Although antivirals remain important for the treatment COVID-19, methods to assess treatment efficacy are lacking. Here, we investigated the impact of remdesivir on viral dynamics and their contribution to understanding antiviral efficacy in the multicenter Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial 1, which randomized patients to remdesivir or placebo. Methods Longitudinal specimens collected during hospitalization from a substudy of 642 patients with COVID-19 were measured for viral RNA (upper respiratory tract and plasma), viral nucleocapsid antigen (serum), and host immunologic markers. Associations with clinical outcomes and response to therapy were assessed. Results Higher baseline plasma viral loads were associated with poorer clinical outcomes, and decreases in viral RNA and antigen in blood but not the upper respiratory tract correlated with enhanced benefit from remdesivir. The treatment effect of remdesivir was most pronounced in patients with elevated baseline nucleocapsid antigen levels: the recovery rate ratio was 1.95 (95% CI, 1.40–2.71) for levels >245 pg/mL vs 1.04 (95% CI,.76–1.42) for levels <245 pg/mL. Remdesivir also accelerated the rate of viral RNA and antigen clearance in blood, and patients whose blood levels decreased were more likely to recover and survive. Conclusions Reductions in SARS-CoV-2 RNA and antigen levels in blood correlated with clinical benefit from antiviral therapy. Clinical Trial Registration NCT04280705 (ClinicalTrials.gov). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and treatment status on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)–related hospitalizations in Georgia. Methods We analyzed 2020–2021 Georgian health registry data for COVID-19–positive individuals and categorized the data by HCV infection and treatment status. Logistic regression was used to assess the strengths of the associations. Results Treated individuals with HCV had lower odds of COVID-19–related hospitalization compared to anti-HCV-negative individuals, while untreated HCV-viremic and anti-HCV-positive nonviremic individuals had higher odds. Conclusions HCV treatment prior to COVID-19 infection was associated with lower odds of COVID-19–related hospitalization, highlighting the benefits of HCV management in the context of the pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The approval of pharmaceuticals in response to the COVID-19 pandemic is a global concern, and during emergencies, emergency approval or authorization systems that enable the rapid use of unapproved drugs to maintain national health are essential. However, there is limited research comparing these systems across countries and their effects. This cross-sectional study examined such systems in Japan (JP), Europe (EU), the United Kingdom (UK), and China (CN) for pharmaceuticals (n = 23) authorized under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in the United States (US) between December 2019 to July 2023. As of the end of July 2023, JP had granted approval or permission for 14 drugs (60.9%), EU for 14 (60.9%), UK for 12 (52.2%), and CN for three (13.0%). An examination of the developmental status of the 23 drugs revealed that JP had 6 drugs (26.1%), the EU had 3 drugs (8.7%), the UK had 5 drugs (21.7%), and CN had 16 drugs (69.6%) yet to be developed. The US had significantly more granted permissions and developed drugs, while CN the least. The UK had a significantly shorter period for approval than the US and the shortest overall. The EU had the shortest period from the issuance of EUA to approval dates. Although not statistically significant, JP had the longest duration until unapproved drugs could be used. Pharmaceuticals granted usage permission under the EUA in JP, the EU, and the UK were developed or on the market in over 70% of cases, whereas in CN, more than two-thirds were yet to be developed. This suggests that CN may not actively utilize pharmaceuticals from other countries for COVID-19 treatment and may rely on its own. When comparing the emergency approval and permission systems of each country, the most significant difference was in the type of system granting approval. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Emerging evidence indicates that activation of complement system leading to the formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC) plays a detrimental role in COVID-19. However, their pathogenic roles have never been experimentally investigated before. We used three knock out mice strains (1. C3−/−; 2. C7−/−; and 3. Cd59ab−/−) to evaluate the role of complement in severe COVID-19 pathogenesis. C3 deficient mice lack a key common component of all three complement activation pathways and are unable to generate C3 and C5 convertases. C7 deficient mice lack a complement protein needed for MAC formation. Cd59ab deficient mice lack an important inhibitor of MAC formation. We also used anti-C5 antibody to block and evaluate the therapeutic potential of inhibiting MAC formation. We demonstrate that inhibition of complement activation (in C3−/−) and MAC formation (in C3−/−. C7−/−, and anti-C5 antibody) attenuates severe COVID-19; whereas enhancement of MAC formation (Cd59ab−/−) accelerates severe COVID-19. The degree of MAC but not C3 deposits in the lungs of C3−/−, C7−/− mice, and Cd59ab−/− mice as compared to their control mice is associated with the attenuation or acceleration of SARS-CoV-2-induced disease. Further, the lack of terminal complement activation for the formation of MAC in C7 deficient mice protects endothelial dysfunction, which is associated with the attenuation of diseases and pathologic changes. Our results demonstrated the causative effect of MAC in severe COVID-19 and indicate a potential avenue for modulating the complement system and MAC formation in the treatment of severe COVID-19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NM/r) is a safe and effective oral antiviral therapeutic used for treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Case reports described a clinical rebound syndrome whereby individuals experience a relapse of symptoms shortly after completing successful treatment. There is a lack of information on frequency of COVID-19 rebound after NM/r in routine clinical care, contributing factors, and clinical outcomes. Methods: We reviewed electronic medical records to verify COVID-19 diagnosis, symptoms, and treatment with NM/r from January-June 2022. We defined COVID-19 clinical rebound as clear improvement in symptoms followed by recurrence or worsening of symptoms within 30 days of a five-day course of NM/r. Results: We studied 268 adults with median age 57 (IQR 47, 68), 80% White race, 85% non-Hispanic ethnicity, 55% female, 80% vaccinated and boosted against SARS-CoV-2, and 68% with any co-morbidity. Sixteen (6.0%) of studied patients were determined to have COVID-19 clinical rebound. The median time from starting NM/r to rebound was 11 days (IQR 9, 13). Notable demographic and clinical factors with higher proportion (not statistically significant) among COVID-19 rebound patients were female sex (75% rebound vs. 54.5% no rebound), Black race (12.5% rebound vs. 4.9% no rebound), presence of at least one co-morbidity (81.3% rebound vs. 67.5% no rebound), and lack of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (100% rebound vs. 92.9% no rebound). Only one patient (6.25%) was hospitalized after COVID-19 rebound. Conclusions: COVID-19 clinical rebound after treatment with NM/r is mild with favorable outcomes and more common than previously reported from real-world clinical care studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractThe ongoing global pandemic caused by viral pathogens like SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) underscores that viral transmission is not confined by geographical boundaries. Thus, the development of novel antiviral therapies is critical to mitigate this crisis. Pyranopyrazoles have gained significant attention in medicinal chemistry due to their bioactive properties. In this study, we present a new series of pyranopyrazoles and their annulated derivatives, which were assessed for antiviral activity using a validated QSAR model and tested for their inhibitory effects against the viral 3CLpro enzyme. The findings were corroborated by various in silico techniques, including molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations, and DFT calculations. Additionally, ADME studies were conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the novel lead compound 2. These investigations identified a series of metabolically stable pyranopyrazoles and their annulated derivatives as effective inhibitors of the SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro enzyme, offering a promising therapeutic option for COVID-19. We believe that pyranopyrazoles warrant further evaluation and chemical optimization for potential use in COVID-19 treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The need for patient engagement in health research has been increasingly acknowledged and accepted in recent years. However, implementation is still limited due to lack of evidence on its value and lack of guidance on how to implement patient engagement. This study aims to provide insight into the contribution of patient engagement in the RECOVAC project, which studied COVID-19 vaccination in kidney patients, and formulate concrete practice-based action perspectives for patient engagement. Methods: We used a qualitative participatory mixed methods approach, based on the Patient Engagement Monitoring and Evaluation (PEME) framework. Patient engagement and data collection were based on the Reflexive Monitoring in Action (RMA) approach. Data collection included participant observations, open ended questionnaires and interactive reflection sessions. Qualitative analysis was done via a thematic approach. Results: We have described the process of patient engagement systematically, provided insight in its value and found that there is a need for clear aims, expectations and preparations from the start of the engagement process. We have shown that reflection throughout the process is of utmost importance and the same applies to clear communication between researchers and patient representatives. By being part of the consortium patient representatives had direct access to information, straight from the source, on for example the vaccination schedule and medication availability and had indirect influence on decisions made by the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) on preventive measures and treatment against COVID-19. Having experienced patient representatives is important, otherwise training needs to be provided. We also found that patient engagement had impact on conduct and outcomes of research activities itself and may have impact on future research and patient engagement activities in general. Conclusion: Patient engagement has changed the course of the project. Concrete practice-based action perspectives have been formulated, which are already being implemented by the Dutch Kidney Patients Association (NVN). Studying patient engagement in a high pace project with high public interest has resulted in lessons learned and will help prepare and implement patient involvement in future research projects. Clinical trial registration: The RECOVAC studies in which the patient engagement took place are registered at clinicialtrial.gov (NCT04741386 registration date 2021-02-04, NCT04841785 registration date 2021-03-22 and NCT05030974 registration date 2021-08-20). Plain English Summary: This article is about the extensive engagement of patients in a scientific research project and what that engagement adds to the project. Although researchers acknowledge the importance of engagement of patients in research projects, it is not happening very often, Because there is not enough scientific evidence on the value of patient engagement and not enough guidance for researcher on how to implement it in their research. We used the Patient Engagement Monitoring and Evaluation (PEME) framework and qualitative participatory mixed methods research to provide insight into patient involvement in the RECOVAC project, which studied COVID-19 vaccination in kidney patients. We also formulated practical guidance for researchers who want to engage patients in their research. We describe the process of patient engagement in the RECOVAC project; what went well and what could be improved. We found that it is important to prepare well, keep reflecting on the engagement process throughout the project with all stakeholders of the project, communicate clearly and have experienced patient representatives involved or have training available for them. Patient engagement had impact on the conduct and outcome of the research activities itself and on activities outside of the project (e.g., doctors changing their conversations with their patients). We can conclude that involving patients changed the project and its outcomes to better fit with the needs of patients. A guideline has been made and is already implemented by the Dutch Kidney Patients Association. The lessons learned from this project will help researchers involve patients in their future projects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The mortality risk of co-infections/secondary infections (CoI/ScI) is under-reported in patients with non-critical COVID-19, leading to the under-management of CoI/ScI and publication bias in the medical literature. We aimed to investigate the association between CoI/ScI and mortality in patients hospitalised with mild-to-severe COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a COVID-19 treatment hospital in Vietnam and collected all eligible medical records, with CoI/ScI status as the exposure (non-CoI/ScI and CoI/ScI, with the latter including nature of pathogen [bacterial, fungal, or bacterial + fungal] and multidrug-resistance pathogen [no MDRp or ≥ 1 MDRp]). The outcome was all-cause mortality, defined as in-hospital death by all causes or being discharged under critical illness. We used time-dependent analysis to report rates of mortality with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI, Poisson regression) and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CI (Cox proportional hazards regression with Holm's method for multiplicity control). Results: We followed 1466 patients (median age 61, 56.4% being female) for a median of 9 days. We recorded 387 (26.4%) deaths (95/144 [66.0%] in the CoI/ScI group and 292/1322 [22.1%] in the non-CoI/ScI group). Adjusted mortality rates (per 100 person-days) of the CoI/ScI (6.4, 95% CI 5.3 to 7.8), including bacterial (8.0, 95% CI 7.2 to 8.9), no MDRp (5.9, 95% CI 4.8 to 7.4), and ≥ 1 MDRp (9.0, 95% CI 8.2 to 10.0) groups were higher than that of the non-CoI/ScI group (2.0, 95% CI 1.8 to 2.2). These corresponded to higher risks of mortality in the overall CoI/ScI (HR 3.27, 95% CI 2.58 to 4.13, adjusted p < 0.001), bacterial CoI/ScI (HR 3.79, 95% CI 2.97 to 4.83, adjusted p < 0.001), no MDRp CoI/ScI (HR 3.13, 95% CI 2.42 to 4.05, adjusted p < 0.001), and ≥ 1 MDRp CoI/ScI group (HR 3.89, 95% CI 2.44 to 6.21, adjusted p < 0.001). We could not attain reliable estimates for fungal and bacterial + fungal CoI/ScI. Conclusion: Compared with the non-CoI/ScI group, patients with CoI/ScI had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality, regardless of resistance status. More evidence is needed to confirm the mortality risks in patients with fungal or bacterial + fungal CoI/ScI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the face of ongoing challenges posed by the COVID-19 and the persistent threat of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the emergence of co-infections such as COVID-19 and HIV has heightened complexities in disease management. This study aims to identify effective control strategies to mitigate COVID-19 and HIV co-infection, which aggravates the existing challenges posed by these two diseases. To achieve this, we formulated a co-infection model that describes the transmission dynamics of COVID-19 and HIV. Under certain circumstances, we established that HIV infection may facilitate COVID-19 transmission, highlighting the need to identify and implement effective interventions to mitigate COVID-19 and HIV co-infection. As a result, we incorporated four time-dependent control strategies in the co-infection model: HIV prevention, HIV treatment, COVID-19 vaccination, and COVID-19 treatment. Numerical simulations were conducted to support and clarify the analytical results and to show how preventative efforts affect the co-infected population. Simulations confirm that applying any of the study's strategies will reduce the number of co-infection cases. However, the implementation of these strategies is constrained by limited resources. Therefore, a comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to identify the most economically viable strategy. The analysis concludes that implementing a combined approach of vaccination and treatment for COVID-19 emerges as the most cost-effective measure for preventing the spread of COVID-19 and HIV. These findings provide crucial guidance for decision-makers in adopting precise preventive strategies, ultimately aiming to reduce mortality rates among HIV patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: While nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV-r) has been positioned as a first-line treatment for mild to moderate COVID-19, it has multiple and significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs). The use of NMV-r in Japan has been limited compared to the United States. This study aimed to describe the distribution of DDIs with NMV-r and their management in patients with COVID-19 under the control of a management system for the appropriate use of NMV-r. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at a Japanese university hospital. The management system included a flowchart for selecting antivirals and a list for reviewing DDI management, based on the National Institutes of Health guidelines and the guidance of the Japanese Society of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences. Patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 and prescribed NMV-r or molnupiravir (MOV) were included. The primary outcome was DDI management practices, including the selected COVID-19 medications. The secondary outcome included the distribution of DDI classification and the 30-day all-cause mortality. Results: This study included 241 patients (median age of 60 years, 112 [46.5%] females), of whom 126 and 115 received NMV-r and MOV, respectively. Of the 241 patients, 145 (60.2%) received concomitant medications that have DDIs with NMV-r. All 30 patients with severe renal impairment or insufficient details on concomitant medications received MOV. Forty-nine patients with concomitant medications required alternative COVID-19 therapy consideration due to DDIs, of whom 42 (85.7%) patients received MOV. Eighty-one patients had concomitant medications requiring temporary adjustment, of whom 44 (54.3%) patients received NMV-r, and 42 of these patients temporarily adjusted these concomitant medications. Five patients with concomitant medications that can continued by monitoring the effects/adverse effects, of whom 4 (80.0%) patients received NMV-r. Seventy-six patients without concomitant medications requiring DDI management, of whom 71 (93.4%) patients received NMV-r. The 30-day all-cause mortality for eligible patients was 0.9% [95% confidence interval, 0.1–3.1]. Conclusions: Most patients received appropriate antivirals according to the classification of DDIs, and most patients with concomitant medications requiring temporary adjustment received the recommended DDI management. Our management system is effective in promoting the use of NMV-r in the appropriate patients and managing problematic DDIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovid) has received emergency use authorization from the US Food and Drug Administration owing to its effectiveness and safety. However, data on the effectiveness and safety of Paxlovid use in COVID-19 patients with onset of more than 5 days are lacking. Methods: A real-world retrospective study was performed during the outbreak involving the SARS-CoV-2 BA.5.2 subvariant. Hospitalized COVID-19 patients (including mild, moderate, severe and critical cases) were divided into three groups: Paxlovid treatment within (Group A) or more than (Group B) 5 days of COVID-19 onset and no Paxlovid treatment during more than 5 days of COVID19 onset with only basic symptomatic treatment (Group C). Endpoints were allcause 28-day mortality, improvement in clinical classification, and a composite endpoint of disease progression, viral load and virus elimination time. Safety was assessed by comparing adverse events reported during treatment in each group. Results: During the period, 248 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, including 55 in Group A, 170 in Group B, and 23 in Group C, were enrolled. There were no significant differences in the clinical classification improvement rate [80.0% (16/ 20) vs. 81.3% (52/64), p = 1.000; 60.0% (21/35) vs. 55.7% (59/106), p = 0.653, respectively] or all-cause 28-day mortality [0% (0/20) vs. 1.6% (1/64), p = 1.000; 11.4% (4/35) vs. 6.6% (7/106), p = 0.576, respectively] between Groups A and B for nonsevere and severe cases. However, the clinical classification improvement rate in Group B was markedly higher than that in Group C [81.3% (52/64) vs. 50.0% (6/12), p = 0.049] among nonsevere cases. Cycle threshold values of the N and ORF genes in Group B were significantly increased after Paxlovid treatment [31.14 (IQR 26.81–33.93) vs. 38.14 (IQR 36.92–40.00), p < 0.001; 31.33 (IQR 26.00–33.47) vs. 38.62 (IQR 35.62–40.00), p < 0.001, respectively]. No significant differences in reported adverse events of neurological disease (p = 0.571), liver injury (p = 0.960) or kidney injury (p = 0.193) between Group A and Group B were found. Conclusion: Paxlovid treatment within 10 days of onset can shorten the disease course of COVID-19 by reducing the viral load. Paxlovid is effective and safe in treating COVID-19 with onset of more than five or even 10 days when patients have a high viral load. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND For many patients with post–COVID-19 condition (long COVID), primary care is the first point of interaction with the health care system. In principle, primary care is well situated to manage long COVID. Beyond expressions of disempowerment, however, the patient’s perspective regarding the quality of long COVID care is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the expectations and experiences of primary care patients seeking treatment for long COVID. METHODS A phenomenological approach guided this analysis. Using purposive sampling, we conducted semistructured interviews with English-speaking, adult primary care patients describing symptoms of long COVID. We deidentified and transcribed the recorded interviews. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive qualitative content analysis. RESULTS This article reports results from 19 interviews (53% female, mean age = 54 years). Patients expected their primary care practitioners (PCPs) to be knowledgeable about long COVID, attentive to their individual condition, and to engage in collaborative processes for treatment. Patients described 2 areas of experiences. First, interactions with clinicians were perceived as positive when clinicians were honest and validating, and negative when patients felt dismissed or discouraged. Second, patients described challenges navigating the fragmented US health care system when coordinating care, treatment and testing, and payment. CONCLUSION Primary care patients’ experiences seeking care for long COVID are incongruent with their expectations. Patients must overcome barriers at each level of the health care system and are frustrated by the constant challenges. PCPs and other health care professionals might increase congruence with expectations and experiences through listening, validating, and advocating for patients with long COVID. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to investigate the activation of the inflammation process, triggered as an immune response to combat the invasion by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). SARS-CoV-2 is a highly transmissible and pathogenic coronavirus that emerged in late 2019 and has caused a pandemic of acute respiratory disease, named 'coronavirus disease 2019' (COVID-19). Several mechanisms contribute to the reduction in serotonin levels, such as the impaired absorption of dietary tryptophan, hindered serotonin transport via platelets, and increased activity of an enzyme responsible for breaking down serotonin. Individuals seeking treatment for long COVID-19 had lower serotonin levels in their blood than those who had fully recovered from the infection. Furthermore, patients with long COVID-19 also had reduced tryptophan levels. The potential benefits of dietary supplementation with tryptophan or the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) to improve cognitive impairments and depressive and anxiety disorders in long-term COVID-19 patients. The findings support the immune response's pivotal role in modulating serotonin levels and further highlight the intricate connection between the immune system and neuro-transmitter regulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aim: The most commonly reported COVID-19 symptoms are high-grade fever, cough and body aches with atypical symptoms ie vomiting, diarrhoea and abdominal discomfort. The primary purpose of this research was to ascertain the frequency of gastrointestinal problems experienced by patients due to COVID-19. Goal was to determine whether or not there was a correlation between the severity of COVID-19 disease and the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms in studied individuals. Methods: The study was conducted at the Gastroenterology Department, PEMH Rawalpindi, Pakistan from January 2022 to January 2023. Confirmed inpatient cases of COVID-19 disease were recruited, referred to Pak Emirates Military Hospital Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) verified the presence of COVID-19 in the patients of this research study. Results: There were 345 patients (335 men and 10 women), with 116 patients exhibiting gastrointestinal symptoms and only 27 patients presented with severe disease. Diarrhoea and anorexia were the most frequently reported digestive symptoms with a frequency of 44 (12.8 %) and 34 (9.9 %), respectively. Clinical outcomes and disease severity were not significantly different between patients with and without digestive issues. Conclusion: The course of a COVID-19 infection seems to include gastrointestinal symptoms, which include, but are not limited to vomiting, diarrhoea, anorexia, etc. Numerous gastrointestinal symptoms are linked to COVID-19 infection even in the absence of respiratory symptoms. As a result, COVID-19 infection should be taken into account for individuals who primarily present with gastrointestinal symptoms. The establishment of personalised COVID-19 therapies will be aided by an understanding of the varying susceptibility of the individual gastrointestinal system to SARSCoV-2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aim: Effective pain management has become more difficult during the COVID-19 pandemic. The spiritual emotional freedom technique (SEFT) can be one of the efforts to overcome acute and chronic pain because SEFT is an intervention that can overcome physical problems by combining spiritual and psychological energy through sincerity of prayer and surrender. Aim of this study was to analyse the effect of SEFT on pain during the COVID-19 pandemic and the difference in the effect of SEFT on pre- and post-intervention pain. Methods: The research method was a quasi-experiment with a pre-posttest group design. The study was conducted by assessing the pain scale before and after using the numeric rating scale (NRS). The sample size in the study was 98 respondents. Inclusion criteria were: patients experiencing acute or chronic pain, composed consciousness, being able to communicate well enough and being consistent with the stages of intervention. Exclusion criteria were, unconsciousness, patients diagnosed with COVID-19, shortness of breath, cognitive impairment and hearing loss. Results: Pain measured by NRS in respondents for the pretest was 2.40 (1.679) and the post-test was 1.39 (0.490) with the interpretation of mild pain. Pretest and post-test on respondents showed significant pain reduction (Wilcoxon test, p = 0.0001; Mann Whitney test, p = 0.013). Conclusion: Respondents experienced less pain after SEFT than before the intervention. The impact of the pain scale on respondents was different before and after SEFT [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The study aimed to compare the outcomes of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir drug combination (Paxlovid) therapy in patients who received treatment within or after five days of COVID-19 confirmed in the elderly. Methodology: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of older COVID-19 patients (= 60 years) admitted from April 7 to May 30, 2022. Patients were categorized into the EP group (starting Paxlovid within five days) and the LP group (starting Paxlovid after five days) following symptoms onset. Length of stay and positive SARS-CoV-2 duration were compared between the two groups. Severe case conversion from mild and moderate COVID-19 patients were also analyzed. Results: In total, 273 patients were included: 137 in the EP group and 136 in the LP group. Compared to the LP group, the EP group had a significantly shorter length of stay (12.4 vs. 14.7 days, p = 0.001) and positive SARS-CoV-2 duration (11.7 vs. 15.8 days, p < 0.001). The EP group had lower severe case conversion (4.4% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.002). Additionally, abnormal IL-6 and lower lymphocyte count indicated increased length of stay. Older age was associated with a decreased risk in SARS-CoV-2 negative test (HR = 0.98) and an increased risk in severe case conversion (OR = 1.11). Conclusions: Starting Paxlovid within five days of COVID-19 symptoms onset reduced the length of stay and SARS-CoV-2 duration compared to initiating treatment after five days. While severe case conversion among mild COVID-19 patients might be comparable whether starting Paxlovid within or after five days. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Favipiravir (FVP) is an antiviral, targeting RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of FVP as a treatment for COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in two centers (San Martino University Hospital in Genova, Italy, and Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Turkey). Adult patients (inpatients) diagnosed with COVID-19 between March and June 2020 were included. All patients in the Italian center received the standard of care (SoC) treatment, while in the Turkish center patients received FVP in addition to SoC. Results: Six hundred-nineteen patients were analyzed (225 from Turkey, all treated with FVP, and 394 from Italy, none treated with FVP). Propensity score-matching was done in 142 patients (71 from the SoC group vs. 71 from the SoC + FVP group). A Higher requirement of NIV/CPAP (n = 38; 53.5%) was registered in the SoC group compared to the SoC + FVP group (n = 9; 12.7%). A higher frequency of intubation was registered in the SoC + FVP group (n = 25; 35.2% vs n = 13, 18.3%). There was a trend towards better survival in SoC + FVP treated patients with HR = 0.64 (95% CI 0.30-1.34). At 28 days the OS was, respectively, 70.3% (95% CI: 53.2-82.1) vs 80.3% (95% CI: 69.0-87.8). Conclusions: The addition of FVP to SoC did not show a significant difference in survival and invasive and noninvasive (CPAP/NIMV) mechanical ventilation compared to standard of care in moderate and severe COVID-19-infected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected the global health sector, especially in patients with comorbidities such as type-2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Patients with these comorbidities require special attention and proper handling during the COVID-19 treatment process, given the higher risk of complications in this group. Gatot Soebroto Army Hospital, as a referral center for COVID-19 in Indonesia, faces the complexity of handling patients who often have complicated clinical conditions which are also related to the costs required. Therefore, analyzing the cost and treatment of COVID-19 patients who also suffer from comorbidities such as hypertension, type-2 diabetes mellitus, type-2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension is essential to improve care management. This study took place from January to July 2021 at Gatot Soebroto Army Hospital. The purpose of the study was to determine the cost and treatment of COVID-19 and the relationship between severity and outcomes. The method used was retrospective observational in COVID-19 patients with these comorbidities. The results showed that the largest cost expenditure came from room and accommodation costs. The highest average total cost came from a combination of comorbid hypertension and type-2 DM. The frequently used treatment profile showed antiviral therapy (favipirapir), antibiotics (Levofloxacin and Azithromycin), anticoagulants (heparin), corticosteroids (dexamethasone), and symptomatic (paracetamol). Improvement in clinical condition was the highest clinical outcome. The result of Chi-Square test analysis between severity and clinical outcome was significant (p-value 0.007<0.05). In conclusion, the treatment profile is adjusted to the clinical condition and the severity of COVID-19 affecting the clinical outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background To address the need for treatments for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), 3 therapies have been given either full approval or Emergency Use Authorization. These were based on randomized data showing a reduction in deaths/hospitalization, but since then, circulating viral strains and population immunity have changed. Methods We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov for clinical trials testing nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir for COVID-19. We identified all trials testing nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir in patients with COVID-19 and assessed the pooled efficacy in a meta-analysis. We calculated pooled estimates of hospitalization and death in patients with COVID-19 and the number of studies with published/reported data. Results Of the 23 studies found, 11 tested nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, 10 tested molnupiravir, and 2 tested both agents. The pooled estimate in reducing deaths and hospitalization for molnupiravir was 0.62 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15–2.53), and the pooled estimate for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was 0.33 (95% CI, 0.03–3.35). The 1 nirmatrelvir/ritonavir trial that reported significant improvements tested people who were predominantly infected with earlier COVID-19 variants, whereas the 2 null trials were tested in people infected with more recent variants. The 2 positive molnupiravir trials included participants primarily with the Delta variant, whereas the null trials were tested later, against more recent variants. Conclusions While early trial data show effectiveness of these therapies, the overall pooled effects are nonsignificant, suggesting that recommendations and use of approved oral COVID-19 treatment therapies need to be reevaluated in the context of current viral strains and population immunity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Higher incidences of interpersonal violence were reported throughout the country during the coronavirus (COVID) time period. We aimed to compare health-care encounters and resource utilization related to interpersonal violence with mental health (MH) disorders before and during the pandemic within a year of the index visit for interpersonal violence. A retrospective analysis of the Delaware Healthcare Claims data of all patients aged ≥16 y who suffered interpersonal violence was performed. Patients were followed up for 1 y pre and post their index visit of interpersonal violence episode during the pre-COVID (March 2018 through December 2018) and the COVID (March 2020 through December 2020) period. Census tract information was used to assess social determinants of health. There were 431 patients in the COVID period and 527 patients in the pre-COVID period with index violence claim encounters. African American patients were more likely to have a violence encounter during COVID (60.3% versus 47.2%, P < 0.001). Patients in the COVID period were more likely to live in a census tract with public assistance households (median 3.3% versus 2.2%, P = 0.005) and higher unemployment (7.5% versus 7.1%, P = 0.01). In the following year of index violence claim, the mean numbers of MH claim-days for COVID and pre-COVID patients were 19.5 (53.3) and 26.2 (66.2), (P = 0.51). The COVID group had fewer MH claim-days mostly in the second half of the year after the index encounter with an incidence rate ratio of 0.61, 95% CI (0.45-0.83). Racial and socioeconomic disparities were amplified and MH resource utilization was lower during COVID. Further injury prevention efforts should be focused on MH in future pandemics or disasters. • Racial and socioeconomic gaps were amplified in victims of violence during COVID. • Mental health related encounters were significantly lower during COVID. • Mental health disorders related to substance abuse were higher during COVID. • Need improved access for mental health services for those who suffer from violence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immunocompromised people are at high risk of prolonged severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and progression to severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the efficacy of late-onset direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy with therapeutics in clinical use and experimental drugs to mitigate persistent viral replication is unclear. In this study, we employed an immunocompromised mouse model, which supports prolonged replication of SARS-CoV-2 to explore late-onset treatment options. Tandem immuno-depletion of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in C57BL/6 mice followed by infection with SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern (VOC) beta B.1.351 resulted in prolonged infection with virus replication for 5 weeks after inoculation. Early-onset treatment with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (paxlovid) or molnupiravir was only moderately efficacious, whereas the experimental therapeutic 4’-fluorouridine (4’-FlU, EIDD-2749) significantly reduced virus load in the upper and lower respiratory compartments 4 days postinfection (dpi). All antivirals significantly lowered virus burden in a 7-day treatment regimen initiated 14 dpi, but paxlovid-treated animals experienced rebound virus replication in the upper respiratory tract 7 days after treatment end. Viral RNA was detectable 28 dpi in paxlovid-treated animals, albeit not in the molnupiravir or 4’-FlU groups, when treatment was initiated 14 dpi and continued for 14 days. Low-level virus replication continued 35 dpi in animals receiving vehicle but had ceased in all treatment groups. These data indicate that late-onset DAA therapy significantly shortens the duration of persistent virus replication in an immunocompromised host, which may have implications for clinical use of antiviral therapeutics to alleviate the risk of progression to severe disease in highly vulnerable patients. IMPORTANCE Four years after the onset of the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the immunocompromised are at greatest risk of developing life-threatening severe disease. However, specific treatment plans for this most vulnerable patient group have not yet been developed. Employing a CD4+ and CD8+ T cell-depleted immunocompromised mouse model of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, we explored therapeutic options of persistent infections with standard-of-care paxlovid, molnupiravir, and the experimental therapeutic 4’-fluorouridine (4’-FlU). Late-onset treatment initiated 14 days after infection was efficacious, but only 4’-FlU was rapidly sterilizing. No treatment-experienced viral variants with reduced susceptibility to the drugs emerged, albeit virus replication rebounded in animals of the paxlovid group after treatment end. This study supports the use of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for late-onset management of persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection in immunocompromised hosts. However, treatment courses likely require to be extended for maximal therapeutic benefit, calling for appropriately powered clinical trials to meet the specific needs of this patient group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and incidence of medication-treated diabetes mellitus and the evolving patterns of glucose-lowering treatments the year before and during the first two years of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods Data from the Greek electronic prescription database were analyzed for 2019, 2020, and 2021. The study population included individuals with active social security numbers. Prevalence and incidence rates were calculated based on the dispensing of glucose-lowering medications according to their unique anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) code. Results The study population comprised 10,289,140 individuals in 2019, 10,630,726 in 2020, and 11,246,136 in 2021. Diabetes prevalence rates were 8.06%, 6.89%, and 7.91%, and incidence rates were 16.8/1000, 8.6/1000, and 13.4/1000 individuals, respectively. Metformin was the most prescribed medication, and newer classes, like sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists exhibited increasing trends. Conclusions The study identified a decrease in medication-prescribed diabetes prevalence and incidence during the initial year of the COVID-19 pandemic, attributed to healthcare access restrictions. Subsequently, figures returned close to baseline levels. Glucose-lowering medication trends reflected adherence to local and international guidelines, with metformin as the cornerstone, and increasing preference for newer classes such as GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: In this retrospective and cross-sectional study, it was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) treatment in critical COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) and developed cytokine storm. Materials and Methods: The study included 219 critically ill COVID-19 patients followed in the ICU and treated with TCZ. All patients received 2 doses of 400 mg/day TCZ treatment during their stay in the ICU. Clinical conditions, laboratory data, inotrope requirement and chest radiographs before and after TCZ treatment were compared. Mortality rates at the 7th day, 28th day and total mortality rates of the patients were recorded. Results: It was observed that there was a significant decrease in CRP values over time after TCZ treatment. There was a significant increase in leukocyte, lymphocyte, lactate, urea, creatinine, AST, D-dimer, LDH and PCT values. The 7-day mortality of the patients was 21%, the 28-day mortality was 64.8%, and the total mortality rate was 65.3%. Conclusion: It was determined that after TCZ treatment, only CRP levels, which are among the inflammatory parameters, decreased significantly in patients, and the mortality rates were still high with the increase in the values of kidney and liver function tests of the patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In susceptible hosts, SARS-CoV2-induced hyperinflammation accounts for an increased mortality. The search of adjuvant immunomodulatory therapies has been ongoing ever since the pandemic outbreak. Aim: Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy of cyclosporin A (CsA) as an add-on therapy to the standard of care (SoC) in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods: We conducted a randomized clinical trial in patients admitted to eight Spanish tertiary hospitals. Patients were stratified into two severity categories and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a corticosteroid-based standard therapy with or without CsA. The primary endpoint was FiO2 recovery by Day 12 without relapses. Results: 109 patients were included and randomized, and 98 of them considered for the mITT population (51 assigned to the CsA + SoC group and 47 to the SoC group). A total of 35 (68.6%) patients from the CsA + SoC group and 32 (71.1%) patients from the SoC group reached the primary endpoint in the mITT analysis. No differences were found after stratification into age groups, in the severity level at admission, or in a combination of both. Overall, the time to FiO2 normalization was 7.4 days vs. 7.9 days in the experimental and control groups, respectively. Global mortality was 8.2%. Severe adverse events were uncommon and equally distributed between arms. Conclusion: The addition of CsA did not show differences over a corticosteroid-based treatment in the clinical course of the included patients. A better identification of candidates who will benefit from receiving immunomodulatory drugs is necessary in future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The objectives were to investigate the clinical characteristics and course of long COVID, defined as the persistence of symptoms at least one month after the onset of COVID-19, in outpatients and to clarify differences in symptoms between SARS CoV-2 mutant strains. Methods: Our observational study in a primary care institution in Japan included 1053 patients with long COVID who visited our outpatient clinic between April 2021 and March 2023. Symptom distribution, performance status, and patient background at the time of the first outpatient visit were compared between infectious strains (Delta and before group and Omicron group). Background factors and symptoms related to time to remission were also analyzed. Results: The severity of COVID-19 in the acute phase was mild, moderate, and severe in 82.2%, 14.9%, and 2.9% in the Delta and before group; and in 97.6%, 1.7%, and 0.4% in the Omicron group, respectively. Vaccination coverage was significantly different between the Delta and before (37.1%) and Omicron groups (73.1%) (p < 0.001), probably due to the period of vaccine unavailability in the former group. Symptoms of fatigue and headache occurred most frequently, irrespective of infectious strain. The mean number of symptoms per patient was significantly higher in the Delta and before group than the Omicron group (3.4 vs. 2.7, p < 0.0001). The median time overall to remission of long COVID was 169 days. Cox hazard model analysis identified female sex, high body mass index, and dyspnea (but not infectious strain) as significant factors prolonging the time to remission (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Differences in the number of symptoms between infectious strains may be related to differences in viral virulence and/or vaccination coverage. However, the clinical course was found to be minimally influenced by the infectious strain. The present results should improve the understanding of prognosis in patients with long COVID from both the clinical and social perspectives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The treatment of fungal infections presents significant challenges due to the lack of standardized diagnostic procedures, a restricted range of antifungal treatments, and the risk of harmful interactions between antifungal medications and the immunosuppressive drugs used in anti-inflammatory treatment for critically ill patients with COVID-19. Mucormycosis and aspergillosis are the primary invasive fungal infections in patients with severe COVID-19, occurring singly or in combination. Histopathological examination is a vital diagnostic technique that details the presence and invasion of fungi within tissues and blood vessels, and the body's response to the infection. However, the pathology report omits information on the most common fungi associated with the observed morphology, as well as other potential fungi and parasites that ought to be included in the differential diagnosis. This research marks significance in diagnosing fungal infections, such as mucormycosis and aspergillosis associated to COVID-19 by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) imaging to examine unstained histopathology slides, allowing for a detailed morphological analysis of the fungus. FESEM provides an unprecedented resolution and detail, surpassing traditional Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) and Grocott's Methenamine Silver (GMS) staining methods in identifying and differentiating dual fungal infections and diverse fungal species. The findings underscore the critical need for individualized treatment plans for patients severely affected by COVID-19 and compounded by secondary fungal infections. The high-magnification micrographs reveal specific fungal morphology and reproductive patterns. Current treatment protocols largely depend on broad-spectrum antifungal therapies. However this FESEM guided diagnostic approach can help in targeted patient specific anti fungal therapies. Such precision could lead to more effective early interventions, addressing the complex management required for severe COVID-19 cases with coexisting fungal infections. This approach significantly advances disease management and patient recovery, advocating for personalized, precision medicine in tackling this multifaceted clinical challenge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mucormycosis is a severe fungal infection which mainly caused by filamentous fungi of the Absidia sp., Rhizopus sp., Cunninghamella sp, Mucor sp., and Rhizomucor sp. Moreover, the pandemic of the SARS-CoV-2 virus expands the need to interfere with spread of the airborne respiratory infections. Accordingly, developing cutting-edge solutions to restrict and/or prevent air contamination by infectious microbes are very warranted. The current work aims to prepare biocidal La-nano complex treated filters and assess their anti-fungal capacity against 20 Rhizopus oryzae, 10 Candida albicans, and 11 Aspergillus fumigatus. These fungi were isolated from the inside parts of the air conditioning systems in the rehabilitation rooms for COVID-19 patients. The obtained results demonstrated that the prepared were able to significantly decrease the invading microbes and eradicate Rhizopus, Aspergillus, Mucor, Candida albicans isolates at 0.64 mg/ml concentration. DFT study compares the electronic properties and reactivity of a ligand in its uncoordinated form with its lanthanum complex. The ligand exhibits lower binding energy, ionization potential, electron affinity, absolute electronegativity, and chemical potential when coordinated with lanthanum. In contrast, the lanthanum complex has a smaller energy gap, absolute hardness, and global softness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives This study explored the experiences and perceptions of public sector pharmacists in primary healthcare during the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in nine small and medium-sized cities in the interior state of Paraná, Brazil. Methods Fourteen individual semi-structured online interviews were conducted using Google Meet®. Employing convenience sampling followed by "snowball" recruitment, audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed through an inductive approach. Key findings Four major themes and two subthemes emerged: (i) workplace and service changes, (i.a) use of social media and remote communication; (ii) working conditions, (ii.b) supply and use of personal protective equipment; (iii) irrational use of medicines against COVID-19; and (iv) mental health. Conclusion Pharmacists reported a lack of preparation, centralization, and coordination, leading to overwhelming workloads and stress. However, they demonstrated resilience in delivering care and promoting rational medicine use. This study offers valuable insights into supporting stakeholders in managing abrupt changes in primary healthcare delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To describe the management of haematological patients experiencing prolonged SARS-CoV-2 viral shedding, as the optimal management strategy for this condition remains undetermined. Methods We conducted a retrospective evaluation of our prospectively followed cohort of haematological patients treated with remdesivir for more than 10 days. Starting January 2023, upon COVID-19 diagnosis, the treatment strategy was based on symptoms and PCR cycle threshold (Ct) as follows: (i) when Ct was 25 or less or if the patient had symptoms, a course of remdesivir for at least 10 days, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for 5 days (whenever possible) and convalescent plasma was administered; and (ii) when the patient was asymptomatic and had a PCR Ct of more than 25, when possible, a course of 5 days of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was administered. The patient was considered to have achieved viral clearance and, thus, remdesivir was stopped, in either of these cases: (i) PCR negativity, or (ii) subgenomic RNA negativity. Results From January to November 2023, 18 patients benefited from a safe extended remdesivir administration, resulting in detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral clearance in a median time of 3.5 weeks (IQR 2.6–3.9) (min–max 1.6–8.0). No clinical or biological side effects were detected. No patient died or needed further treatment for their COVID-19 episode. Conclusions The extended course of remdesivir, combined with other active therapies for COVID-19 infection, was well tolerated. Cure and virus negativity were obtained in all these high-risk patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To determine the effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir among vaccinated and unvaccinated non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19. Methods Observational studies of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir compared to no antiviral drug treatment for COVID-19 in non-hospitalized adults with data on vaccination status were included. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, WHO COVID-19 Research Database and medRxiv for reports published between 1 January 2022 and 8 November 2023. The primary outcome was a composite of hospitalization or mortality up to 35 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I. Risk ratios (RR), hazard ratios (HR) and risk differences (RD) were separately estimated using random-effects models. Results We included 30 cohort studies on adults treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (n  = 462 279) and molnupiravir (n  = 48 008). Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir probably reduced the composite outcome (RR 0.62, 95%CI 0.55–0.70; I 2 = 0%; moderate certainty) with no evidence of effect modification by vaccination status (RR P subgroup = 0.47). In five studies, RD estimates against the composite outcome for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were 1.21% (95%CI 0.57% to 1.84%) in vaccinated and 1.72% (95%CI 0.59% to 2.85%) in unvaccinated subgroups. Molnupiravir may slightly reduce the composite outcome (RR 0.75, 95%CI 0.67–0.85; I 2 = 32%; low certainty). Evidence of effect modification by vaccination status was inconsistent among studies reporting different effect measures (RR P subgroup = 0.78; HR P subgroup = 0.08). In two studies, RD against the composite outcome for molnupiravir were −0.01% (95%CI −1.13% to 1.10%) in vaccinated and 1.73% (95%CI −2.08% to 5.53%) in unvaccinated subgroups. Conclusions Among cohort studies of non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is effective against the composite outcome of severe COVID-19 independent of vaccination status. Further research and a reassessment of molnupiravir use among vaccinated adults are warranted. Registration PROSPERO CRD42023429232. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: COVID-19 is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In this study, around 300 herbal compounds were screened virtually to find the best anti-COVID-19 structures. Materials and Methods: An extensive search in electronic databases was done. Around 300 herbal compounds, which were previously proven to be antiviral structures, were extracted from articles and considered our primary database. Then, molecular docking studies were performed to find the best inhibitors of the main SARS-COV-2 proteins, including spike protein (PDB 7BWJ), RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (PDB 6M71) and main protease (PDB 5R7Z). Results: The molecular docking and dynamics studies revealed that fangchinoline as an alkaloid could bind to the main protease of the virus more potent than lopinavir (-42.26 vs. -30.9 kJ/mol). Fangchinoline can be orally active based on drug-like properties. According to the molecular dynamic study, the complex between the fangchinoline and SARS-CoV-2 main protease is stable. chebulagic acid is a benzopyrene tannin that could inhibit RNAdependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) better than remdesivir (-43.9 vs. -28.8 kJ/mol). The molecular dynamic study showed that chebulagic acid-RdRp interaction is stable and strong. Furthermore, suramin could neutralize different variants of COVID-19 spike proteins (wild type, and alpha and beta variants). However, suramin is not orally active but it is a potential inhibitor for different coronavirus spike proteins. Conclusion: According to the promising in silico results of this study, fangchinoline, chebulagic acid and suramin could be introduced as potential lead compounds for COVID-19 treatment. We are hopeful to find a reliable remedy shortly through natural compounds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Levamisole is an anti-helminthic drug developed and introduced in veterinary medicine, and it has been used more frequently after the inclusion of its usage in human medicine regarding disorders with immunomodulatory properties. In recent years, it has started to attract attention since it has beneficial effects on the treatment of COVID-19 due to its immunomodulatory properties. To investigate the effects of levamisole on sexual behavior and the reproductive system in male rats, two groups were formed the vehicle (n = 10) and levamisole (n = 10) groups. The vehicle group was given purified water whereas the levamisole group was administered with levamisole (2 mg/kg) by oral gavage daily for 4 weeks. Levamisole treatment significantly increased the mount latency (ML, P < 0.001) as well as the intromission latency (IL, P < 0.01). It also significantly prolonged postejaculatory interval (PEI, P < 0.01), decreased copulatory rate (CR, P < 0.05), and sexual activity index (SAI, P < 0.05). It significantly decreased serum monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) levels (P < 0.05). Additionally, levamisole induced disorganizations of germinal epithelial cells of seminiferous tubules, congestion, edema in the interstitial area, and metaphase arrest in some spermatocytes (P < 0.001), and it significantly increased the immunohistochemical expressions of apoptotic Bax and cytochrome c, which is crucial proapoptotic protein, in the testis (P < 0.001). Also, levamisole significantly upregulated the mRNA levels of the apoptosis-related key regulatory genes, including Bax (Bcl-2-associated X protein, P = 0.05) and Bax/Bcl-2 ratio (P < 0.01) in testis. The current research is the first to show that levamisole may decrease sexual performance, potency, sexual motivation, and libido and induce apoptosis in the testis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]