Search

Rationale: Pulmonary endothelial permeability contributes to the high-permeability pulmonary edema that characterizes acute respiratory distress syndrome. Circulating BMP9 (bone morphogenetic protein 9) is emerging as an important regulator of pulmonary vascular homeostasis. Objectives:To determine whether endogenous BMP9 plays a role in preserving pulmonary endothelial integrity and whether loss of endogenous BMP9 occurs during LPS challenge. Methods: A BMP9-neutralizing antibody was administrated to healthy adult mice, and lung vasculature was examined. Potential mechanisms were delineated by transcript analysis in human lung endothelial cells. The impact of BMP9 administration was evaluated in a murine acute lung injury model induced by inhaled LPS. Levels of BMP9 were measured in plasma from patients with sepsis and from endotoxemic mice. Measurements and Main Results: Subacute neutralization of endogenous BMP9 in mice (N = 12) resulted in increased lung vascular permeability (P = 0.022), interstitial edema (P = 0.0047), and neutrophil extravasation (P = 0.029) compared with IgG control treatment (N = 6). In pulmonary endothelial cells, BMP9 regulated transcriptome pathways implicated in vascular permeability and cell-membrane integrity. Augmentation of BMP9 signaling in mice (N = 8) prevented inhaled LPS-induced lung injury (P = 0.0027) and edema (P < 0.0001). In endotoxemic mice (N = 12), endogenous circulating BMP9 concentrations were markedly reduced, the causes of which include a transient reduction in hepatic BMP9 mRNA expression and increased elastase activity in plasma. In human patients with sepsis (N = 10), circulating concentratons of BMP9 were also markedly reduced (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Endogenous circulating BMP9 is a pulmonary endothelial-protective factor, downregulated during inflammation. Exogenous BMP9 offers a potential therapy to prevent increased pulmonary endothelial permeability in lung injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The lungs are exposed to a range of environmental toxins (including cigarette smoke, air pollution, asbestos) and pathogens (bacterial, viral and fungal), and most respiratory diseases are associated with local or systemic hypoxia. All of these adverse factors can trigger endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. The ER is a key intracellular site for synthesis of secretory and membrane proteins, regulating their folding, assembly into complexes, transport and degradation. Accumulation of misfolded proteins within the lumen results in ER stress, which activates the unfolded protein response (UPR). Effectors of the UPR temporarily reduce protein synthesis, while enhancing degradation of misfolded proteins and increasing the folding capacity of the ER. If successful, homeostasis is restored and protein synthesis resumes, but if ER stress persists, cell death pathways are activated. ER stress and the resulting UPR occur in a range of pulmonary insults and the outcome plays an important role in many respiratory diseases. The UPR is triggered in the airway of patients with several respiratory diseases and in corresponding experimental models. ER stress has been implicated in the initiation and progression of pulmonary fibrosis, and evidence is accumulating suggesting that ER stress occurs in obstructive lung diseases (particularly in asthma), in pulmonary infections (some viral infections and in the setting of the cystic fibrosis airway) and in lung cancer. While a number of small molecule inhibitors have been used to interrogate the role of the UPR in disease models, many of these tools have complex and off-target effects, hence additional evidence (eg, from genetic manipulation) may be required to support conclusions based on the impact of such pharmacological agents. Aberrant activation of the UPR may be linked to disease pathogenesis and progression, but at present, our understanding of the context-specific and disease-specific mechanisms linking these processes is incomplete. Despite this, the ability of the UPR to defend against ER stress and influence a range of respiratory diseases is becoming increasingly evident, and the UPR is therefore attracting attention as a prospective target for therapeutic intervention strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

GM‐CSF is important in regulating acute, persistent neutrophilic inflammation in certain settings, including lung injury. Ligand binding induces rapid internalization of the GM‐CSF receptor (GM‐CSFRα) complex, a process essential for signaling. Whereas GM‐CSF controls many aspects of neutrophil biology, regulation of GM‐CSFRα expression is poorly understood, particularly the role of GM‐CSFRα in ligand clearance and whether signaling is sustained despite major down‐regulation of GM‐CSFRα surface expression. We established a quantitative assay of GM‐CSFRα surface expression and used this, together with selective anti‐GM‐CSFR antibodies, to define GM‐CSFRα kinetics in human neutrophils, and in murine blood and alveolar neutrophils in a lung injury model. Despite rapid sustained ligand‐induced GM‐CSFRα loss from the neutrophil surface, which persisted even following ligand removal, pro‐survival effects of GM‐CSF required ongoing ligand‐receptor interaction. Neutrophils recruited to the lungs following LPS challenge showed initially high mGM‐CSFRα expression, which along with mGM‐CSFRβ declined over 24 hr; this was associated with a transient increase in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) mGM‐CSF concentration. Treating mice in an LPS challenge model with CAM‐3003, an anti‐mGM‐CSFRα mAb, inhibited inflammatory cell influx into the lung and maintained the level of BALF mGM‐CSF. Consistent with neutrophil consumption of GM‐CSF, human neutrophils depleted exogenous GM‐CSF, independent of protease activity. These data show that loss of membrane GM‐CSFRα following GM‐CSF exposure does not preclude sustained GM‐CSF/GM‐CSFRα signaling and that this receptor plays a key role in ligand clearance. Hence neutrophilic activation via GM‐CSFR may play an important role in neutrophilic lung inflammation even in the absence of high GM‐CSF levels or GM‐CSFRα expression. GM‐CSF released during ALI stimulates neutrophil recruitment, induces down‐regulation of GM‐CSFR, and GM‐CSF consumption by neutrophils, yet sustained anti‐apoptotic signals require continued GM‐CSF stimulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]