59 results on '"Cumberbatch, Marcus G"'
Search Results
52. Reply to Wentao Liu, Xiaokun Zhao, Zhaohui Zhong's Letter to the Editor re: Marcus G. Cumberbatch, Matteo Rota, James W.F. Catto, Carlo La Vecchia. The Role of Tobacco Smoke in Bladder and Kidney Carcinogenesis: A Comparison of Exposures and Meta-analysis of Incidence and Mortality Risks. Eur Urol 2016;70:458–66
- Author
-
Cumberbatch, Marcus G., primary, Rota, Matteo, additional, Catto, James W.F., additional, and La Vecchia, Carlo, additional
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
53. The contemporary landscape of occupational bladder cancer within the United Kingdom: a meta-analysis of risks over the last 80 years
- Author
-
Cumberbatch, Marcus G., primary, Windsor-Shellard, Ben, additional, and Catto, James W. F., additional
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
54. Systematic Review of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer to Develop Recommendations Regarding Inclusion of Intermediate-risk Disease, Biopsy Characteristics at Inclusion and Monitoring, and Surveillance Repeat Biopsy Strategy
- Author
-
Peter-Paul M. Willemse, Niall F. Davis, Nikolaos Grivas, Fabio Zattoni, Michael Lardas, Erik Briers, Marcus G. Cumberbatch, Maria De Santis, Paolo Dell'Oglio, James F. Donaldson, Nicola Fossati, Giorgio Gandaglia, Silke Gillessen, Jeremy P. Grummet, Ann M. Henry, Matthew Liew, Steven MacLennan, Malcolm D. Mason, Lisa Moris, Karin Plass, Shane O'Hanlon, Muhammad Imran Omar, Daniela E. Oprea-Lager, Karl H. Pang, Catherine C. Paterson, Guillaume Ploussard, Olivier Rouvière, Ivo G. Schoots, Derya Tilki, Roderick C.N. van den Bergh, Thomas Van den Broeck, Theodorus H. van der Kwast, Henk G. van der Poel, Thomas Wiegel, Cathy Yuhong Yuan, Philip Cornford, Nicolas Mottet, Thomas B.L. Lam, Tilki, Derya, Willemse, Peter-Paul M., Davis, Niall F., Grivas, Nikolaos, Zattoni, Fabio, Lardas, Michael, Briers, Erik, Cumberbatch, Marcus G., De Santis, Maria, Dell'Oglio, Paolo, Donaldson, James F., Fossati, Nicola, Gandaglia, Giorgio, Gillessen, Silke, Grummet, Jeremy P., Henry, Ann M., Liew, Matthew, MacLennan, Steven, Mason, Malcolm D., Moris, Lisa, Plass, Karin, O'Hanlon, Shane, Omar, Muhammad Imran, Oprea-Lager, Daniela E., Pang, Karl H., Paterson, Catherine C., Ploussard, Guillaume, Rouvière, Olivier, Schoots, Ivo G., van den Bergh, Roderick C.N., Van den Broeck, Thomas, van der Kwast, Theodorus H., van der Poel, Henk G., Wiegel, Thomas, Yuan, Cathy Yuhong, Cornford, Philip, Mottet, Nicolas, Lam, Thomas B.L., Koç University Hospital, and School of Medicine
- Subjects
Image-Guided Biopsy ,Male ,Localised prostate cancer ,Biopsy ,Urology ,Active surveillance ,Clinical practice guidelines and recommendations ,Consensus statements ,Core involvement ,Criteria for inclusion and eligibility ,Monitoring and reclassification ,Per-protocol or untriggered repeat biopsies ,Positive cores ,Systematic review ,Prostate ,Prostatic Neoplasms ,Prostate-Specific Antigen ,SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being ,Oncology ,Humans ,Watchful Waiting - Abstract
Context: there is uncertainty regarding the most appropriate criteria for recruitment, monitoring, and reclassification in active surveillance (AS) protocols for localised prostate cancer (PCa). Objective: to perform a qualitative systematic review (SR) to issue recommendations regarding inclusion of intermediate-risk disease, biopsy characteristics at inclusion and monitoring, and repeat biopsy strategy. Evidence acquisition: a protocol-driven, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA)-adhering SR incorporating AS protocols published from January 1990 to October 2020 was performed. The main outcomes were criteria for inclusion of intermediate-risk disease, monitoring, reclassification, and repeat biopsy strategies (per protocol and/or triggered). Clinical effectiveness data were not assessed. Evidence synthesis: of the 17 011 articles identified, 333 studies incorporating 375 AS protocols, recruiting 264 852 patients, were included. Only a minority of protocols included the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for recruitment (n = 17), follow-up (n = 47), and reclassification (n = 26). More than 50% of protocols included patients with intermediate or high-risk disease, whilst 44.1% of protocols excluded low-risk patients with more than three positive cores, and 39% of protocols excluded patients with core involvement (CI) >50% per core. Of the protocols, ?80% mandated a confirmatory transrectal ultrasound biopsy; 72% (n = 189) of protocols mandated per-protocol repeat biopsies, with 20% performing this annually and 25% every 2 yr. Only 27 protocols (10.3%) mandated triggered biopsies, with 74% of these protocols defining progression or changes on MRI as triggers for repeat biopsy. Conclusions: for AS protocols in which the use of MRI is not mandatory or absent, we recommend the following: (1) AS can be considered in patients with low-volume International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade 2 (three or fewer positive cores and cancer involvement ?50% CI per core) or another single element of intermediate-risk disease, and patients with ISUP 3 should be excluded; (2) per-protocol confirmatory prostate biopsies should be performed within 2 yr, and per-protocol surveillance repeat biopsies should be performed at least once every 3 yr for the first 10 yr; and (3) for patients with low-volume, low-risk disease at recruitment, if repeat systematic biopsies reveal more than three positive cores or maximum CI >50% per core, they should be monitored closely for evidence of adverse features (eg, upgrading); patients with ISUP 2 disease with increased core positivity and/or CI to similar thresholds should be reclassified. Patient summary: We examined the literature to issue new recommendations on active surveillance (AS) for managing localised prostate cancer. The recommendations include setting criteria for including men with more aggressive disease (intermediate-risk disease), setting thresholds for close monitoring of men with low-risk but more extensive disease, and determining when to perform repeat biopsies (within 2 yr and 3 yearly thereafter)., NA
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
55. A Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Toxicity of Brachytherapy Boost Combined with External Beam Radiotherapy for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer.
- Author
-
Slevin F, Zattoni F, Checcucci E, Cumberbatch MGK, Nacchia A, Cornford P, Briers E, De Meerleer G, De Santis M, Eberli D, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Liew M, Linares Espinós EE, Oldenburg J, Oprea-Lager DE, Ploussard G, Rouvière O, Schoots IG, Smith EJ, Stranne J, Tilki D, Smith CT, Van Den Bergh RCN, Van Oort IM, Wiegel T, Yuan CY, Van den Broeck T, and Henry AM
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Treatment Outcome, Prostatic Neoplasms radiotherapy, Prostatic Neoplasms pathology, Brachytherapy methods
- Abstract
Context: The optimum use of brachytherapy (BT) combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localised/locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) remains uncertain., Objective: To perform a systematic review to determine the benefits and harms of EBRT-BT., Evidence Acquisition: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and EBM Reviews-Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were systematically searched for studies published between January 1, 2000 and June 7, 2022, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Eligible studies compared low- or high-dose-rate EBRT-BT against EBRT ± androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and/or radical prostatectomy (RP) ± postoperative radiotherapy (RP ± EBRT). The main outcomes were biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), severe late genitourinary (GU)/gastrointestinal toxicity, metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS), at/beyond 5 yr. Risk of bias was assessed and confounding assessment was performed. A meta-analysis was performed for randomised controlled trials (RCTs)., Evidence Synthesis: Seventy-three studies were included (two RCTs, seven prospective studies, and 64 retrospective studies). Most studies included participants with intermediate-or high-risk PCa. Most studies, including both RCTs, used ADT with EBRT-BT. Generally, EBRT-BT was associated with improved bPFS compared with EBRT, but similar MFS, CSS, and OS. A meta-analysis of the two RCTs showed superior bPFS with EBRT-BT (estimated fixed-effect hazard ratio [HR] 0.54 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.40-0.72], p < 0.001), with absolute improvements in bPFS at 5-6 yr of 4.9-16%. However, no difference was seen for MFS (HR 0.84 [95% CI 0.53-1.28], p = 0.4) or OS (HR 0.87 [95% CI 0.63-1.19], p = 0.4). Fewer studies examined RP ± EBRT. There is an increased risk of severe late GU toxicity, especially with low-dose-rate EBRT-BT, with some evidence of increased prevalence of severe GU toxicity at 5-6 yr of 6.4-7% across the two RCTs., Conclusions: EBRT-BT can be considered for unfavourable intermediate/high-risk localised/locally advanced PCa in patients with good urinary function, although the strength of this recommendation based on the European Association of Urology guideline methodology is weak given that it is based on improvements in biochemical control., Patient Summary: We found good evidence that radiotherapy combined with brachytherapy keeps prostate cancer controlled for longer, but it could lead to worse urinary side effects than radiotherapy without brachytherapy, and its impact on cancer spread and patient survival is less clear., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
56. Reporting Radical Cystectomy Outcomes Following Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Williams SB, Cumberbatch MGK, Kamat AM, Jubber I, Kerr PS, McGrath JS, Djaladat H, Collins JW, Packiam VT, Steinberg GD, Lee E, Kassouf W, Black PC, Cerantola Y, Catto JWF, and Daneshmand S
- Subjects
- Humans, Length of Stay, Treatment Outcome, Cystectomy methods, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms surgery
- Abstract
Context: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a perioperative approach to managing surgical patients. The impact of ERAS on radical cystectomy (RC) outcomes remains understudied., Objective: To review the literature regarding ERAS protocols and RC outcomes. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS)., Evidence Acquisition: A systematic review of the articles published from 1970 through 2018 was conducted. Individual patient data (IPD) were requested and a meta-analysis was performed., Evidence Synthesis: A total of 4197 articles were retrieved and 22 (reporting 4048 patients) were selected for the review. LOS followed by 30-d and that followed by 90-d complications were the most common endpoints. ERAS use was associated with reduced morbidity, quicker bowel recovery, and shorter LOS, without affecting mortality. IPD were obtained for 2077 patients from 11 studies. In multivariable models, LOS was associated with ERAS use (regression coefficient: -4.54 [95% confidence interval {CI}: -5.79 to -3.28] d with ERAS p < 0.001) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (+1.64 [1.38-1.90] d for each point increase, p < 0.001), and varied between hospitals (from -1.59 [-3.03 to -0.14] to +4.55 [1.89-7.21] d, p < 0.03). Individual ERAS components associated with shorter LOS included no nasogastric (NG) tube (-8.70 [-11.9 to -5.53] d, p < 0.001) and local anesthesia blocks compared with regional anesthesia (-3.29 [-6.31 to -0.27] d, p = 0.03)., Conclusions: ERAS protocols were associated with reduced LOS and postoperative complication rate. Avoidance of NG tubes and use of local anesthesia blocks were significantly associated with reduced LOS. These findings reflect different components of recovery, which ERAS can optimize and further support documentation of the use of ERAS components when reporting RC outcomes., Patient Summary: Use of enhanced recovery in patients undergoing surgery to remove the bladder is associated with fewer surgical complications and a shorter hospital stay. Avoidance of nasogastric tubes and use of local anesthesia after the operation were associated with a shorter length of stay., (Copyright © 2020 European Association of Urology. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
57. Biomarkers predicting oncological outcomes of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
- Author
-
Afferi L, Moschini M, Cumberbatch MG, Catto JW, Scarpa RM, Porpiglia F, Mattei A, Sanchez-Salas R, and Esperto F
- Subjects
- Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Risk Assessment methods, Treatment Outcome, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms psychology, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms surgery, Biomarkers, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms therapy
- Abstract
Introduction: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Spanish Urological Club for Oncological Treatment (CUETO) scoring systems show limited accuracy for the prediction of disease recurrence and progression of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). This aspect is even more relevant in the category of HR NMIBC. Biomarkers might potentially help to further categorize the outcomes of these patients. Therefore, we sought to review the evidence available on tissue-based, urinary, and serum biomarkers for the prediction of recurrence, progression, and survival in HR NMIBC., Evidence Acquisition: A systematic literature review without time restrictions was performed using PubMed/EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Libraries. The search was filtered for articles in the English, Italian, German, French, and Spanish languages, involving patients with more than 18 years of age. Relevant papers on tissue-based, serum and urinary biomarkers related to the prediction of oncological outcomes for high-risk bladder cancer patients were included in the analyses., Evidence Synthesis: Overall, 71 studies were eligible for inclusion in this review. The majority of the investigations performed so far focused on immunohistochemical analyses on tumoral tissue. Overall, p53 was the most studied biomarker, but results regarding its prognostic and predictive role were contradictory. Ki67 seems to be a promising biomarker in the prediction of recurrence. Recently, PD-L1 has been associated with the prediction of recurrence free survival and of treatment-refractory disease. Markers developed un urine samples are focused on commercially available kits, which currently do not unequivocally show strongly superior levels of accuracy to cytology. However, they have demonstrated to be potentially helpful in the prediction of recurrence. Blood-based biomarkers represent an emerging reality with promising future applications., Conclusions: Despite a long history of attempts to discover accurate biomarkers predicting oncological outcomes for HR NMIBC, contradictory or uncertain findings render the adoption of this ancillary techniques in clinical practice still unlikely. Future attempts should be directed to the development of prospective trials and the definition of standardized cut-off levels to render findings worthy of comparison.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
58. Epidemiology, aetiology and screening of bladder cancer.
- Author
-
Cumberbatch MGK and Noon AP
- Abstract
Bladder cancer (BC) is a common, significant and expensive health condition. Understanding the risk factors for this disease is paramount to improving disease prevention and increasing public awareness. Historically BC has been a disease of industrialized regions and the most responsible carcinogens are tobacco smoke and occupational chemical exposure. BC incidence and mortality differ dramatically by region and reflect differences in risk factor exposure, healthcare behaviour, and population demographics. Screening studies have suggested a survival benefit amongst screened non-symptomatic populations with known risk factors, but this has not become standard practice., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
59. Repeat Transurethral Resection in Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review.
- Author
-
Cumberbatch MGK, Foerster B, Catto JWF, Kamat AM, Kassouf W, Jubber I, Shariat SF, Sylvester RJ, and Gontero P
- Subjects
- Humans, Neoplasm Grading, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Neoplasm Staging, Neoplasm, Residual, Risk Factors, Survival Rate, Urinary Bladder pathology, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local pathology, Reoperation, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms pathology, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms surgery
- Abstract
Context: Initial treatment for most bladder cancers (BCs) involves transurethral resection (TUR) or tumours. Often more cancer is found after the initial treatment in around half of patients, requiring a second resection. Repeat transurethral resection (reTUR) is recommended for high-risk, non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) to remove any residual disease and improve cancer outcomes., Objective: To systematically review the practice and therapeutic benefit of an early reTUR for high-risk NMIBC., Evidence Acquisition: A systematic review of original articles was performed using PubMed/Medline and Web of Science databases in December 2016 (initial) and October 2017 (final). We searched the references of included papers., Evidence Synthesis: We screened 15 209 manuscripts and selected 31 detailing 8409 persons with high-grade Ta and T1BC for inclusion. Detrusor muscle was found at initial TUR histology in 30-100% of cases. Residual tumour at reTUR was found in 17-67% of patients following Ta and in 20-71% following T1 cancer. Most residual tumours (36-86%) were found at the original resection site. Upstaging occurred in 0-8% (Ta to ≥T1) and 0-32% (T1 to ≥T2) of cases. Conflicting data report the impact of reTUR on subsequent recurrence and cancer-specific mortality. Recurrence for Ta was 16% in the reTUR group versus 58% in the non-reTUR group. For T1, recurrence ranged from 18% to 56%, but no clear trend was identified between reTUR and control. No clear relationship between reTUR and progression was found for Ta, although for T1 rates were higher in the non-reTUR group in series with control populations (5/6 studies). Overall mortality was slightly reduced in the reTUR group in two studies with controls (22-30% vs 26-36% [no reTUR])., Conclusions: Residual tumour is common after TUR for high-risk NMIBC. The reTUR helps in the diagnosis of this residual cancer and may improve outcomes for cancers initially staged as T1., Patient Summary: Some bladder cancers (BCs) are aggressive but confined to the bladder surface. Initial treatment includes endoscopic resection. More cancer is found after the initial treatment in approximately half of patients. In the aggressive but confined group of BC, a second resection, a few weeks after the first, may help find this residual cancer and improve outcomes, although the evidence quality for this is weak., (Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.