Search

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of suspended drug by tablet crushing in our pediatric hospital in term of targeted dose and to identify parameters involved in the potential variability. Four usually crushed pediatric drug substances were selected: amiodarone, warfarin, hydrocortisone and captopril. Each tablet was crushed in a bag using a crusher device. Once crushed, a pre-determined volume of water was added using oral syringes before taking the necessary volume to obtain the targeted drug amount. For each drug, operators among pharmacy technicians and nurses investigated 2 targeted doses (high and low). Each suspension was assayed 3 times using the corresponding validated HPLC procedure. Statistical analysis was performed (GraphPad Prism®) to evaluate the impact of operators, the level of suction in bag, and actual drug doses. To investigate the impact of formulation change on syringe drug content, five generic drugs of amiodarone were selected. Syringes contents were compared using one-way ANOVA. Drug loss in syringe ranged from 8.1% to 54.1%. The drug loss represented 18.9% to 30.5% for amiodarone, 0.1% to 5.5% for captopril, 5.6% to 19.7% for warfarin and 5.0% to 30.7% for hydrocortisone. The comparison of level sampling of suspensions presented significant differences for amiodarone, hydrocortisone, and warfarin. Comparison of operators demonstrated significant difference between pharmacy technician and nurse (p = 0.0251). Finally, comparison of 5 generic drugs for amiodarone showed some statistical difference between the syringes content obtained when using the original medicine as compared to the generics. The physicochemical properties of each drug substance and the formulation of the drug product may both factor that should be considered. As a result, crushing tablets in water for oral administration needs a case by case assessment. Although appropriate pediatric formulations are lacking, suspend the crushed material in a given volume of water should be discouraged and not recommended because far from good practice., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Since July 2017, different generic imatinib formulations have been introduced in Italy for the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). We analyzed 168 chronic phase CML patients treated with branded imatinib for a median of 12 years (range 1-16) at a single institution who switched to a single generic formulation in order to assess the safety and impact on molecular response. The Sokal risk was low/intermediate/high in 63%, 33%, and 4% of patients, respectively. The median duration of generic imatinib treatment was 19 months (range 4-22). Twenty-seven percent of patients were in MMR and 73% were in deep molecular responses (MR4-4.5) at the time of the switch. After 12 months of treatment with generic imatinib, 140 patients were evaluable for response: 23.6% and 76.4% were respectively in MMR and in deep molecular response. When the degree of response was compared with the best molecular response observed with branded imatinib, it was found that 84% of patients maintained the response previously achieved, 6% improved it, and 10% of patients had a molecular fluctuation from the previous deep molecular response to MMR. Only 1 patient lost the MMR and no patient switched to another TKI for inefficacy. In terms of safety, 20% of patients reported new or worsening side effects, but only 2 patients returned to branded imatinib for toxicity. Our data show that the switch to generic imatinib in patients who have been previously treated with branded imatinib appears to maintain efficacy, although a proportion of patients experience new or worsening side effects.

Background: Temozolomide is an alkylating agent approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 1999 for the treatment of patients with primary brain tumors. The aim of this study was to confirm the bioequivalence and safety of two strengths (20-100 mg) of generic temozolomide in the form of TOZ039 and Temodal ® capsules administered to brain tumor patients., Study Design: An open-label, randomized, two-phase, two-period, crossover pharmacokinetic study was performed in a single institution. The reference and test drugs were prescribed at a dose of 150 mg/m 2 daily from days 1 to 5 of a 28-day cycle in the first phase; in the second phase, either a 150- or 200-mg/m 2 dose was prescribed, depending on patient tolerance. On days 1 and 2 of each phase, a fixed 200-mg dose was administered either as ten 20-mg capsules in the first cycle or two 100-mg capsules in the second cycle. Drug administration in the first two days was randomized, i.e., if TOZ309 was administered on day 1, Temodal ® was administered on day 2, and vice versa. The rest of the prescribed dose was administered in the form of Temodal ® and spread equally over days 3-5. Blood samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic evaluation on days 1 and 2. Bioequivalence was demonstrated if the geometric means ratio of the three main pharmacokinetic parameters (mean maximum plasma concentration (C max ), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) 0-t, AUC 0-∞ ) fell within the equivalence boundary of 80-125%., Results: Twenty-nine glioblastoma multiforme or anaplastic astrocytoma patients were enrolled and dosed with the test and reference formulations under fasting conditions. The 90% confidence interval of the geometric means ratio for C max (91.08%, 106.18%), AUC 0-t (98.62%,102.18%), and AUC 0-∞ (98.65%, 102.21%) was well within the 80%-125% range for the 20-mg capsule, as was the C max (90.49%, 113.32%), AUC 0-t (99.89%, 104.63%) and AUC 0-∞ (99.99%, 104.67%) for the 100-mg capsule drug product. Additionally, all the secondary pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly different. After two cycles of treatment, there was no mortality among the 29 patients, treatment-related severe adverse events, or events that would require study discontinuation; however, one significant adverse effect (life-threatening seizures) occurred and was related to disease progression. Adverse events were reported in 82.8% (24/29) patients, and treatment emergent adverse events were reported in 72.4% (21/29) patients., Conclusion: It can be concluded that 20-mg and 100-mg capsules of TOZ309 are bioequivalent to Temodal ® capsules of the same strength under fasting conditions., Trial Registration: https://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html , CTR2017 0122.

Background Despite the advantages of dexmedetomidine (DEX) over propofol (PRO) including minimal respiratory depression and the potential for preventing and/or treating intensive care unit (ICU) delirium, PRO has been the preferred agent due to its lower cost. However, the acquisition cost of DEX has considerably decreased as a generic version of DEX has recently become available. Objective To evaluate clinical and economic outcomes of DEX-based sedation compared to PRO in the ICU. Setting A retrospective cohort study of 86 ICU patients who received either DEX or PRO for a period ≥ 12 h. Method Patients were matched by age, sex, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores in a 1:1 ratio. Main outcome measure Clinical outcomes included the duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), and requirements of concomitant sedatives and opioids. Economic outcomes included the ICU and hospital costs as well as the cost of sedatives or combined sedatives and opioids per patient. Results There were no significant differences in ICU and hospital LOS and time on MV in both groups (median ICU LOS 7 [DEX] vs. 9 [PRO] days, p = 0.07; median hospital LOS 12 [DEX] vs. 14 [PRO] days, p = 0.261; median time of MV 144 [DEX] vs. 158 [PRO] hours, p = 0.176). DEX-based sedation compared to PRO was associated with similar ICU and hospital costs (US$ 67,561 vs. 78,429, p = 0.39; US$ 71,923 vs. 71,084, p = 0.1). Conclusion The clinical outcomes and economic impact associated with DEX- and PRO-based sedation were similar.

The antidepressant bupropion is stereoselectively metabolized and metabolite enantiomers have differential pharmacologic effects, but steady-state enantiomeric disposition is unknown. Controversy persists about bupropion XL 300 mg generic equivalence to brand product, and whether generics might have different stereoselective disposition leading to enantiomeric non-bioequivalence and, thus, clinical nonequivalence. This preplanned follow-on analysis of a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, crossover study of brand and 3 generic bupropion XL 300 mg products measured steady-state enantiomeric plasma and urine parent bupropion and primary and secondary metabolite concentrations and evaluated bioequivalence and pharmacokinetics. Steady-state plasma and urine bupropion disposition was markedly stereoselective, with up to 40-fold differences in plasma concentrations of the active metabolite S,S-hydroxybupropion vs. R,R,-hydroxybupropion. Urine metabolite glucuronides were prominent, but glucuronidation was metabolite-specific and enantioselective. There were no differences between any generic and brand, or between generics, in plasma enantiomer concentrations of bupropion or the major metabolites. All generic products satisfied formal bioequivalence criteria (peak plasma concentration (C max ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 hours (AUC 0-24 )) using enantiomers for bupropion as well as for metabolites, and generics were comparable to each other, and were considered bioequivalent, based on enantiomeric analysis. Enantiomeric bioequivalence explains the previously observed therapeutic equivalence of bupropion generics and brand in treating major depression. These results have important implications for understanding the clinical therapeutic effects of bupropion based on complex and stereoselective metabolism., (© 2020 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2020 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Purpose: Following the recent European Medicine Agency (EMA) draft guideline on quality and equivalence of topical products, a modular framework for bioequivalence assessment is proposed, wherein the qualitative, quantitative, microstructure and product performance sameness is demanded to support generic applications. Strict regulatory limits are now imposed, but, the suitability of these limits has been subject of intense debate. In this context, this paper aims to address these issues by characterizing a panel of 8 reference blockbuster semisolid topical products., Methods: For each product, three batches were selected and, whenever possible, batches retrieved from different manufacturing sites were considered. Product microstructure was evaluated in terms of globule size, pH, rheological attributes and, if required, the thermal behaviour was also assessed. Performance was evaluated through in vitro release testing (IVRT). Finally, an integrated multivariate analysis was performed to highlight the features that most contribute for product variability., Results: Marked differences were registered within reference products. Statistical analysis demonstrated that if EMA criteria are applied, none of the same product batches can be considered as equivalent. Rheological parameters as well as IVRT indicators account for the majority of batch-to-batch differences., Conclusions: Semisolid dosage forms exhibit intrinsic variability. This calls for the attention to the need of establishing reasonable equivalence criteria applied to generic drug products. Graphical abstract.

Background: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a disease characterized by a progressive rise in pulmonary vascular resistance. Ambrisentan is an oral, propanoic acid based-endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA), selective for the endothelin type-A receptor, which is approved for the treatment of PAH. The Colombia National Food and Drug Surveillance Institute regulatory criteria require demonstrating that the proposed generic product is bioequivalent to its reference-listed drug to obtain marketing approval., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to test the bioequivalence, pharmacokinetics, and tolerability of ambrisentan 10 mg tablets., Methods: In this open-label, randomized, oral single-dose, two-way crossover bioequivalence study, 26 Mexican adult healthy male subjects received either the generic product of ambrisentan 10 mg or the reference product Volibris ® (ambrisentan) 10 mg tablets during each study period under fasting conditions. There was a 7-day washout period between each dosing. Ambrisentan concentrations in plasma samples were quantified using a validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method. Blood samples were collected up to 72 h post-dose in each study period. The primary end points were maximum plasma concentration (C max ) and area under the plasma concentration-time (AUC 0-t ) curve between 0 and 72 h for ambrisentan., Results: The ratios (90% CI) of geometric mean for ambrisentan were 104.3% (97.12-111.98%) and 100.2% (95.56-104.72%). These pharmacokinetic parameter values lie within the INVIMA-specified bioequivalence limits of 80%-125%. Nervous system disorders were the most common adverse events (AEs). All AEs were mild to moderate in nature and were resolved after follow-up or pharmacologic treatment. Both products were safe and well tolerated., Conclusions: The test product ambrisentan 10 mg tablets is bioequivalent to the reference product Volibris ® (ambrisentan) 10 mg tablets. Both treatments were well tolerated in the Mexican male population of this study., Trial Registration: COFEPRIS National Clinical Trials Registry number 183300410B0367/2018.

The cost of prescription drugs has increased at rates far exceeding general inflation in recent history, with topical drugs increasing at a disproportionate rate compared to other routes of administration. We assessed the relationship between net changes in the number of therapeutic options, defined as any approved drug or therapeutic equivalent on the market, and prescription topical drug spending. Drugs were divided based on the category of use through pairing of Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drug products databases. Across drug classes, we modeled the log of the ratio of total spending per unit in 2015 to total spending per unit in 2011 as a linear function of net number of topical therapeutic options over this time period. Primary outcomes include total Medicaid Part D spending on topical drugs and net change in the number of available therapeutic options within each category of use. Total spending on topical drugs increased by 61%, while the number of units dispensed increased by only 18% from 2011-2015. The greatest total spending increases were in categories with few new therapeutic options, such as topical corticosteroid and antifungal medications. Each net additional therapeutic option during 2011-2015 was associated with an reduction in how much relative spending per unit increased (95% CI 2.5%-14.4%, p = 0.013). Stimulating greater competition through increasing the net number of therapeutic options within each major topical category of use may place downward pressure on topical prescription drug spending under medicare Part D.

In developed countries, most people living with HIV/AIDS are treated with costly brand single-tablet regimens. Given the economic impact, French guidelines recommend using generic antiretroviral therapy when possible to decrease antiretroviral therapy costs. We aimed to study HIV-infected patients' acceptability to switch from a brand single-tablet regimens [abacavir/lamivudine/dolutegravir (Triumeq®) or emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/rilpivirine (Eviplera®)] to a treatment comprising of two pills: one is a fixed-dose generic combination of 2 Nucleoside Analogs and the second tablet is the third antiretroviral. This study was a prospective observational study in a French hospital. During their follow-up, patients on stable single-tablet regimens were made aware of the possible cost-saving. They were questioned about their willingness and barriers accepting the substitution. Participants chose between the two regimens, either to remain on single-tablet regimens or switch to the de-simplified regimen. Six months later, a second survey was given to the patient who chose to de-simplify and HIV viral load was controlled. The study included 98 patients: 60 receiving emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/rilpivirine (Eviplera®) and 38 on abacavir/lamivudine/dolutegravir (Triumeq®). Forty-five patients accepted the de-simplified treatment, 37 refused and 16 were undecided and followed the decision offered by their physician. The main reason for unwillingness to switch is the number of pills (77.3%). In multivariate model analysis, male patients (p = 0.001) who have taken antiretroviral therapy for over 20 years (p = 0.04) and who retrieve their treatment in their community hospital (p = 0.03) are more likely to accept the switch. Fifty-one patients accepted to replace their single-tablet regimens and six months later, the majority was satisfied; only four returned to single-tablet regimens because of suspected side effects. Half of the people living with HIV/AIDS in our cohort accepted to switch from brand single-tablet regimens to a two-tablet regimen containing generic drugs within a process that emphasizes health expenditure savings., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: Basaglar, insulin glargine (BGlar; Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN), a follow-on biologic, was developed after the patent for Lantus, insulin glargine (LGlar; Sanofi-Aventis, Paris, France) expired. Objective: To compare the dosing and hemoglobin A 1C (A1C)-lowering effects of BGlar compared with LGlar in a real-world setting. Methods: Adult patients, at 5 clinics, with type 1 (T1DM) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who were converted from LGlar to BGlar were included in this retrospective observational study. The primary outcome compared mean basal insulin dose (U/d) from the date of conversion to 6 months. Basal insulin and total daily insulin doses were also compared from baseline to 3- and 12-months postconversion, as also change in A1C, body weight, and estimated monthly acquisition costs of basal insulin. Results: Of the 225 patients included, 56% were male, and 81% had T2DM. The mean conversion dose (U/d) of LGlar was 46.3 ± 32.7. There was no significant difference in the mean BGlar dose (U/d) at 6 months (45.9 ± 33.5; P = 0.52), nor was there a statistical difference at 3 or 12 months. There were no significant differences in change in A1C at any time point. The estimated monthly acquisition cost of BGlar was significantly less than that for LGlar at conversion ($286 vs $341, P < 0.001) and 6 months ($290 vs $351, P < 0.001) respectively. Conclusion/Relevance: The results of this retrospective study suggest that BGlar resulted in similar glycemic outcomes compared with LGlar in a real-world setting and may be a preferable option in a value-based health care environment.

Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Purpose: This study compares the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles between a new generic and a branded reference formulation of amitriptyline hydrochloride tablets, and assesses the bioequivalence of the two products in healthy Chinese volunteers to obtain sufficient evidence for the marketing approval of the generic drug., Materials and Methods: A randomized, open-label, two-period crossover study (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03646526) was conducted under both fasting and fed conditions in healthy Chinese volunteers (24 subjects/condition). Eligible subjects randomly received a single 25 mg dose of either the test or the reference formulation, followed by a 3-week washout period. Blood samples were collected until 144 h following administration. The pharmacokinetic parameters were acquired based on the concentration-time profiles, including the areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC 0-t , AUC 0-∞ ), the peak plasma concentration (C max ), the time to achieve C max (T max ), and the elimination half-life (t 1/2 ). The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of amitriptyline were acquired for bioequivalence analysis, and values of these parameters for nortriptyline were used for comparison of therapeutic outcomes. Safety assessments included laboratory tests, physical examination, vital signs, and incidence of adverse events (AEs)., Results: The values of t 1/2 and T max for amitriptyline were not significantly different between the test and reference products under both fasting and fed conditions (P > 0.05). The GMRs of C max , AUC 0-t , and AUC 0-∞ between the two products, and corresponding 90% CIs, were all within the range of 80% to 125% under both fasting and fed conditions. The test and reference products were well tolerated and did not elicit serious adverse events., Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the generic and reference products were well tolerated by the subjects and bioequivalent, according to the rate and extent of the drug absorption., Competing Interests: Hunan Dongting Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Hunan, China) funded our study, which was the manufacturer of amitriptyline hydrochloride tablets. The funder had not any influence on data collection and analysis, manuscript preparation, and decision to publish. All authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2020 Zhai et al.)

Aims: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of generic exenatide with branded exenatide Byetta ® in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled on monotherapy or combination therapy of metformin and insulin secretagogues., Methods: A multicenter, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial was performed. A total of 240 patients with T2DM and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 7% (53 mmol/mol) to ≤ 9.0% (75 mmol/mol) on monotherapy or combination therapy of metformin and insulin secretagogues for at least 3 months were randomized into generic exenatide or branded exenatide groups with a 1:1 ratio for 16 weeks of treatment. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c levels from baseline at week 16, with a non-inferiority margin of - 0.35% (- 3.83 mmol/mol) (lower bound of one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) > - 0.35% (- 3.83 mmol/mol)). Secondary endpoints included the proportion of participants achieving HbA1c < 7% (53 mmol/mol), the changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-h postprandial glucose (2hPG) following a standard meal, 7-point self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) profiles, body weight change from baseline at week 16 and the change in HbA1c levels from baseline at week 8. Safety issues were also evaluated., Results: After 16 weeks of treatment, HbA1c levels decreased significantly from baseline in the two groups, with a reduction of - 1.10% ± 1.31% (- 12.0 mmol/mol ± 14.3 mmol/mol) in the generic exenatide group and - 1.08% ± 1.11% (- 11.8 mmol/mol ± 12.1 mmol/mol) in the branded exenatide group (both P < 0.001). The least-squares mean difference of HbA1c reduction between the two groups was - 0.03% (- 0.33 mmol/mol), with a lower one-sided 95% CI limit of - 0.27% (- 2.95 mmol/mol), which was higher than the prespecified non-inferiority margin of - 0.35% (- 3.83 mmol/mol). Moreover, there were no significant differences in the proportion of participants achieving HbA1c < 7% (53 mmol/mol) and the changes in FPG, 2hPG, 7-point SMBG profiles and body weight at week 16 and the change in HbA1c levels from baseline at week 8 (all P > 0.05) between the two groups. The incidence of adverse events, including the incidence of hypoglycemia (18.3% and 17.5%, respectively), was similar for the generic and branded exenatide groups (P > 0.05)., Conclusions: In patients with T2DM inadequately controlled on monotherapy or combination therapy of metformin and insulin secretagogues, add-on treatment with generic exenatide demonstrated non-inferiority to branded exenatide in terms of improvements in HbA1c after 16 weeks of treatment. Furthermore, the two drugs were also similar for other efficacy endpoints and safety profile. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR-IPR-15006558, Date registered May 27, 2015.

Background: Breast cancer (BC) stands first with high incidence and mortality in India. Most of the oncologists are unaware of cost savings by utilising generic drugs., Aim: To perform a cost minimization analysis of generic versus branded chemotherapeutic regimen for treatment of BC., Methodology: CIMS (current index of medical stores) was referred for the cost of branded drugs and the generic cost was taken from Jan Aushadhi scheme. The percentage cost variation and potential cost-saving particular to BC regimens on substituting available generic drug was calculated using standard formula and costs were presented in Indian Rupees and US Dollars (as of 2019)., Results: Among the branded agents considered, a range of 25% to 606.11% cost variation was observed with cyclophosphamide and 5-Fluorouracil respectively. Gemcitabine proposed the highest cost variation (373.68%-990.78%) and cyclophosphamide (71.42%-114.28%) with the lowest variation when compared to generic drugs. The highest level of cost-saving (₹60,807.3 to ₹1,31,864.1) with TAC regimen and the lowest range (₹12,15.84 to ₹15,667.2) with AC regimen was observed among adjuvant therapy regimens., Conclusion: Our evaluation inferred that substituting generic chemotherapeutic drugs can bring potential cost savings. Healthcare professionals and patients should aware and opt generic drugs to achieve goals of BC therapy.

New drugs against the in COVID-19 pandemic are urgently needed. Gilead Science's remdesivir has been introduced to China through special approval procedures, and was directly conducting the Phase III clinical trial. As expected, the marketing authorization process was completed soon. The drug brought hope to patients as well as business opportunities to companies. However, we must pay attention to the patent competition, generic drug competition and other unfair competition that remdesivir may face in China. China also needs to strengthen the innovation ability and international cooperation ability of local pharmaceutical companies by taking advantages of the opportunity to introduce remdesivir.

The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the bioequivalence of 2 tablet formulations of prucalopride, generic and branded, and to investigate relevant pharmacokinetic and safety profiles. This study was designed as a randomized, open-label, fasting, single-dose, crossover, and dual-period trial. After overnight fasting, 12 subjects were given prucalopride tablets via oral administration, and blood specimens were obtained up to 96 hours after dosing. Prucalopride concentrations in plasma were measured using ultraprecision liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry followed by calculation of pharmacokinetic parameters. The safety of prucalopride was assessed throughout the study. The pharmacokinetics of prucalopride can be defined as a 2-compartment model with a long elimination phase. No significant differences were observed between the pharmacokinetic profiles of the generic and branded prucalopride tablets. Bioequivalence was evaluated using 90%CIs for the ratio test/reference of log area under the concentration-time curve over 96 hours, log area under the concentration-time curve to infinity, and log peak concentration from generic and branded tablets, which were 100.06-109.94%, 100.63-110.32%, and 95.84-113.08%, respectively. During administration of the medication, there were 18 adverse events in 6 subjects in the test formulation group and 19 cases of adverse events in 6 subjects in the reference formulation group (P > .05). No severe adverse effects were detected. These results suggest that generic and branded prucalopride tablets are bioequivalent and show similar safety profiles., (© 2019, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background: Cyclosporine A (CyA) is a drug for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Recently, a generic formulation has been approved as bioequivalent to the branded one. The guidelines for the bioequivalence for critical-dose drugs with a narrow therapeutic range, such as CyA, are questionable. Therefore, it is important to assess the clinical outcome and the pharmacokinetics of different formulations in various patient groups. The current literature lacks of this information in dermatology. The primary objective of this prospective study is to investigate the clinical equivalence (in terms of maintenance of clinical effect) between the generic formulation of CyA and its branded one in patients with psoriasis. A secondary objective is to analyze their trough (C0) and peak levels (C2)., Methods: Twenty patients with stable psoriasis under treatment with the branded CyA were monitored in terms of clinical efficacy (psoriasis area severity index, PASI), safety (laboratory values), and their pharmacokinetics utilizing trough (C0) and peak plasma concentration (C2). The same patients were subsequently shifted to the generic formulation for comparison., Results: In our sample the efficacy of the two formulations was equal in most cases (P=0.863). A non-significant difference between the C0 and C2 of the branded CyA compared to the generic one emerged (respectively P=0.738 and P=0.695)., Conclusions: The branded and the generic formulations of CyA seem to be not only bioequivalent, but also comparable in terms of clinical efficacy in patients with psoriasis. However, larger samples are required to confirm these findings.

Background The World Health Organization estimates that over 50% medicines are prescribed inappropriately and the main driver of antimicrobial resistance globally. There have only been a limited number of studies evaluating prescribing patterns against national standard treatment guidelines (STGs) in sub-Saharan African countries including Namibia. This is important given the high prevalence of both infectious and non-infectious diseases in sub-Saharan Africa alongside limited resources. Objective Our aim was to assess prescribing practices and drivers of compliance to National guidelines among public health care facilities in Namibia to provide future guidance. Setting Three levels of public healthcare in Namibia. Method A mixed method approach including patient exit and prescriber interviews at three levels of health care in Namibia, i.e. hospital, health centre and clinic. Main outcome measures Medicine prescribing indicators, compliance to and attitudes towards National guidelines. Results Of the 1243 prescriptions analysed, 73% complied with the STGs and 69% had an antibiotic. Of the 3759 medicines (i.e. mean of 3.0 ± 1.1) prescribed, 64% were prescribed generically. The vast majority of prescribers were aware of, and had access to, the Namibian STGs (94.6%), with the majority reporting that the guidelines are easy to use and they regularly refer to them. The main drivers of compliance to guidelines were programmatic, that is access to up-to date objective guidelines, support systems for continued education on their use, and ease of referencing. Lack of systems to regulate noncompliance impacted on their use. Conclusion Whilst the findings were encouraging, ongoing concerns included limited prescribing of generic medicines and high use of antibiotics. A prescribing performance management system should be introduced to improve and monitor compliance to prescribing guidelines in public healthcare.

Background: For a patient, drug switches are not desirable (either between a brand-name drug and a generic drug, or between two generic drugs of the same active substance). Research into the causes of drug switches, and related adverse drug reactions, is hampered by the absence of quantitative data on drug switches., Methods: We describe the frequency of drug switches in the Netherlands for a selection of active substances. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Drug Information System of the National Health Care Institute in the Netherlands. We studied the Dutch patient population from mid-2009 to 2016. The selection of active substances (n = 20) was made based on a report by Lareb, the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre, on adverse drug reactions related to drug switching, and we used qualitative and quantitative descriptive analyses. A drug switch is defined as the replacement of a patient's prescribed drug with a similar drug from a different manufacturer., Results: We identified 23.8 million drug switches on a total of 206 million (11.6%) similar drug dispenses. The frequency of drug switches demonstrated a yearly peak in the period from January to March. In some months, for atorvastatin, losartan, pantoprazole, and irbesartan, more than 60% of similar drug dispenses were drug switches. Most drug switches (80.3%) were between two generic drugs, and 0.12% of these involved a drug from a European parallel import. The proportion of drug switches between two brand-name drugs decreased from 14.5 to 5.53% during our study period, and of these, 86.5% involved a drug from a European parallel import., Conclusions: Drug switching is common in the Netherlands, and most of the drug switches we studied are between generic drugs. The observed annual peak of drug switches is most likely explained by a specific Dutch reimbursement policy. Not only are the data valuable as is, but they also serve as a first step towards elucidating the reasons for the occurrence of these drug switches. In addition, these data can be used to put into perspective the adverse drug reactions associated with drug switching.

A challenge in anticipating generic entry is elucidating which patents and regulatory protections constrain generic entry.

Introduction: To compare the efficacy and safety of generic and branded imatinib in adults with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP), we retrospectively reviewed data from patients CML-CP who received generic or branded imatinib., Patients and Methods: A propensity score matching (PSM) study was performed. A Cox regression model was used to identify factors associated with responses and outcomes., Results: Four hundred forty-two adults receiving generic imatinib (n = 236) or Glivec (Novartis, Basel, Switzerland; n = 206) were included. There were more patients with rural household registration (P < .001), lower education level (P < .001), divorced or widowed status (P = .009), higher white blood cell counts (P = .019), splenomegaly (P < .001), and longer intervals from diagnosis to imatinib initiation (P = .033) in the generic cohort. During the follow-up, there was no significant difference between the 2 cohorts in the 4-year probabilities of achieving a complete cytogenetic response (97.0% vs. 97.3%; P = .736), major molecular response (87.8% vs. 90.1%; P = .113), and molecular response 4.5 (32.5% vs. 38.8%; P = .186), as well as failure-free survival (77.3% vs. 81.4%; P = .313), progression-free survival (94.4% vs. 95.8%; P = .489), and overall survival (96.8% vs. 98.3%; P = .088). Multivariate analyses showed that the drug type was not associated with responses and outcomes. After the PSM procedure, 177 pairs of patients with comparable baseline characteristics were reanalyzed. Multivariate analyses confirmed that generic or branded imatinib used as first-line therapy was not associated with either responses or outcomes., Conclusion: Sociodemographic characteristics might influence the tyrosine kinase inhibitor that patients chose. Generic and branded imatinib as first-line therapy had comparable efficacy and safety in CML-CP patients., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The anticoagulant response to warfarin, a narrow therapeutic index drug, increases with age, which may make older patients susceptible to adverse outcomes resulting from small differences in bioavailability between generic and brand products. Using US Medicare claims linked to electronic medical records from two large hospitals in Boston, we designed a cohort study of ≥ 65-year-old patients. Patients were followed for a composite effectiveness outcome of ischemic stroke or venous thromboembolism, a composite safety outcome, including major hemorrhage, and a 1-year all-cause mortality outcome. After propensity score fine-stratification and weighting to account for > 90 confounders, hazard ratios comparing brand vs. generic warfarin initiators (95% confidence intervals) for the effectiveness, safety, and all-cause mortality outcomes, were 0.97 (0.65-1.46), 0.94 (0.65-1.35), and 0.84 (0.62-1.13), respectively. Results from subgroup analyses of patients with atrial fibrillation, CHADS-VASc score ≥ 3, and HAS-BLED score ≥ 3 were consistent with the primary analysis., (© 2019 The Authors Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2019 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Chronic hepatitis C virus infection remains a national and global public health burden and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Oral direct-acting antiviral combination regimens have excellent tolerability and efficacy with rates exceeding 90%. Sustained virologic response is associated with significant improvements in clinical outcomes. However, translation of sustained virologic response rates from trials to community settings has been poor with interferon-based regimens. We review and summarize key datasets from major real-world observational cohort studies. We review preliminary data from oral generic direct-acting antiviral formulations. Future real-world studies are needed to further clarify optimal treatment strategies for difficult-to-treat populations., Competing Interests: Disclosure A. Tran reports no relevant conflicts of interest. J.K. Lim reports clinical trial contracts (to institution) from AbbVie and Gilead and consulting honoraria from Gilead., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The approval of topical generic products is essentially governed by clinical endpoint studies. Is this the most efficient approach to document bioequivalence in these particular dosage forms? This issue has sparked multiple discussions among different stakeholders - academia, industry and several regulatory agencies - in the active pursuit for new and robust surrogate methodologies. This mini review attempts to critically discuss this topic in light of the recently issued European regulatory requirements within the proposed modular framework for bioequivalence assessment., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Warfarin is a narrow therapeutic index anticoagulant drug, and several generic formulations have been approved worldwide. However, there has been no report evaluating the bioequivalence of warfarin sodium according to US Food and Drug Administration draft guidance. We designed a 2-sequence and 4-period crossover study to compare the pharmacokinetic profile and assess bioequivalence between the test warfarin sodium tablet and reference product Coumadin (2.5 mg) in 56 healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. The plasma concentration of warfarin was analyzed by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay, and the reference-scaled procedure was used to determine bioequivalence for the pharmacokinetics parameters. The results showed that the point estimate of geometric mean ratios of C max and AUC 0-t for warfarin were 103.21% and 99.31%, respectively, in the fasting condition and 100.62% and 98.98%, respectively, in the fed condition, and the 90% confidence intervals were all within the range of 90.00%-111.11%. The upper limit of the 90% confidence interval of estimated within-subject variation ratios of the test and reference products was 1.33 for C max and 2.22 for AUC 0-t under the fasting condition and 1.68 for C max and 2.15 for AUC 0-t under the fed condition. Overall, bioequivalence of the 2 warfarin sodium products was demonstrated., (© 2020, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Generic formulations of tamoxifen are commonly prescribed to oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA). We carried out a post-marketing surveillance of the generic tamoxifen formulation in current use at INCA, by comparing plasma concentrations of the parent drug and metabolites obtained with the generic vs the reference formulation. Thirty patients participated in an open-label, bracketed protocol, comprising 3 successive phases of 30-32 days each: the generic formulation was used in phases 1 and 3 and the reference formulation in phase 2. Two blood samples were collected in the last 4 days of each phase, for LC-MS/MS quantification of tamoxifen and metabolites in plasma. The median plasma concentrations (ng/mL) for the reference formulation were as follows: tamoxifen, 135.0 (CI 95% 114.2-155.8); endoxifen, 35.3 (30.0-40.8); and 4-hydroxytamoxifen, 4.8 (4.2-5.4). The endoxifen/tamoxifen plasma concentration ratio was 0.27 (0.21-0.25). ANOVA detected no statistically significant difference in plasma concentrations of tamoxifen, metabolites or the endoxifen/tamoxifen ratio among the three phases. The genetic component (rGC) of the CYP2D6-mediated conversion of tamoxifen into endoxifen, estimated using the repeated drug administration procedure across the three phases, was 0.87, pointing to an important component of genetic variability. In conclusion, this first post-marketing surveillance trial of oncologic generic drugs carried out in Brazilian patients verified the switchability between the reference and the generic tamoxifen formulation currently used at our institution. The adopted bracketed protocol adds confidence to this conclusion and may serve as a frame for future trials of post-marketing assessment of other generic drug products., (© 2019 Nordic Association for the Publication of BCPT (former Nordic Pharmacological Society).)

Purpose: Clinical trials have clearly documented the survival benefit of aromatase inhibitors (AIs); however, many women fail to initiate (primary nonadherence) or remain adherent to AIs (secondary nonadherence). Prior studies have found that costs impact secondary nonadherence to medications but have failed to examine primary nonadherence. The purpose of this study is to examine primary and secondary adherence following the reduction in copays due to the introduction of generic AIs., Methods: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data, we identified 50 054 women diagnosed with incident breast cancer between 2008 and 2013. We compare women whose copays would change and those whose would not, due to the receipt of cost-sharing subsidies before and after generics were introduced using a difference-in-difference (DinD) analysis. To examine primary and secondary nonadherence, we rely on a multistate model with four states (Not yet initiated, User, Not Using, and Death). We adjusted for baseline factors using inverse probability treatment weights and then simulated adherence for 36 months following diagnosis., Results: The generic introduction of AIs resulted in patients initiating AIs faster (DinD = -4.7%, 95%CI = -7.0, -2.3; patients not yet initiating treatment at 6-months), being more adherent (DinD ranging in absolute increase of 8.1%-10.4%) and being less likely to not be using the therapy (DinD range in absolute decrease of 1.2% at 6 months to 8.8% at 24 months) for women that do not receive a subsidy after generics were available., Conclusions: Introduction of generic alternatives to AIs significantly reduced primary and secondary nonadherence., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Generic products offer a considerable cost savings for American consumers and the US healthcare industry. While generics for many products have become available, the approval and adoption of generics for orally inhaled drug products (OIDPs) has lagged behind, owing to the difficulties in bringing these complex generic products to the market. As a complex product, OIDP performance is impacted by numerous factors derived from the product's formulation, delivery to a local site of action within the lung, the performance of the device, and the patient population that uses the medication. Therefore, determining equivalence between generic and brand-name OIDPs requires an approach that considers each of these aspects in order to ensure bioequivalence. FDA's recommended aggregate weight-of-evidence approach for generic OIDPs provides a paradigm where studies and conditions, when taken together, establish equivalence in device performance, systemic exposure, and local drug delivery. This review article covers the various aspects of OIDP complexity, the challenges each presents to equivalence, and FDA's efforts to address these challenges and complex drug development as a whole under the Generic Drug User Fee Amendments (GDUFA). The aggregate weight-of-evidence approach, its rationale, and scientific support is also described.

Multiple sclerosis, which is characterized by inflammation and neurodegeneration, is considered a chronic disease of the central nervous system. Given the lack of pharmacokinetic evaluation of teriflunomide in the Iranian context, the present 2-way crossover study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetic properties and bioequivalence of 2 teriflunomide formulations. To this end, 2 single-dose generic and branded teriflunomide formulations were orally administered to 14 healthy Iranian male volunteers. A washout period of 21 days was allowed between the treatments. The plasma samples containing teriflunomide were analyzed by a simple and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography method using standard ultraviolet detection. In addition, the pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for bioequivalence evaluation. The peak area ratio between the teriflunomide and the internal standard was the source of calibration curves, which were linear over the range of 20-40,000 ng/mL (R 2 = 0.9994). The results indicated that the 2 formulations had similar pharmacokinetics. Further, the 90%CI of the mean ratios of the test versus the reference formulations of log-transformed area under the concentration-time curve over 72 hours (93% to 107%) and peak concentration (92% to 108%) were within the acceptable range of 80% to 125%. Based on the obtained results, the test formulation of teriflunomide could be similar to that of the reference formulation., (© 2019, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Objective: The present study compared the pharmacokinetics of two (1 mg) tacrolimus formulations (test (generic from Panacea) and reference (innovator from Astellas)) after a single-dose administration as per the European Medicine Agency (EMA) guidelines to grant marketing authorization., Materials and Methods: This study was a randomized, open-label, balanced, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequences, single-dose, truncated-area, crossover design with a washout period of 19 days between the phases. Healthy subjects aged 18 - 45 years (both inclusive) were included. Eligible subjects received a single oral dose of 5 × 1-mg capsule of tacrolimus either test or reference formulation. Blood samples were collected until 72.00 hours postdose, and peak concentration (C max ) and area under the curve (AUC 0-72 ) were evaluated in whole blood using validated LC-MS/MS. Safety was also assessed in each period., Results: Of 56 subjects enrolled, 52 completed both study periods. The arithmetic mean (SD) C max for the reference and test formulations was 40.62 (11.30) and 46.20 (10.73) ng/mL, and AUC 0-72 was 348.34 (156.41) and 361.04 (158.71) ng×h/mL, respectively. The geometric least square mean ratio (90% confidence interval (CI)) was 115.07% (90% CI: 109.81, 120.59) for C max and 103.78 (90% CI: 97.40, 110.58) for AUC 0-72 , which fell within the acceptance range as per EMA guidelines for narrow therapeutic index drugs (C max : 80.00 - 125.00%; AUC: 90.00 - 111.11%). No serious adverse event was observed., Conclusion: The generic tacrolimus was bioequivalent to the reference formulation, was well tolerated, and provides a well-acceptable alternative to the reference drug. Switching treatment to generic tacrolimus medication may reduce the cost and economic burden of treating transplanted patients.

Generic entry of newer anticoagulants is expected to decrease the costs of atrial fibrillation management. However, when making switches between brand and generic medications, bioequivalence concerns are possible. The objectives of this study were to predict and compare the lifetime cost-effectiveness of brand dabigatran with hypothetical future generics. Markov microsimulations were modified to predict the lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years of patients on either brand or generic dabigatran from a US private payer perspective. Event rates for generics were predicted using previously developed pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models. The analyses showed that generic dabigatran with lower-than-brand systemic exposure were dominant. Meanwhile, generic dabigatran with extremely high systemic exposure was not cost-effective compared with the brand reference. Cost-effectiveness of generic medications cannot always be assumed as shown in this example. Combined use of pharmacometric and pharmacoeconomic models can assist in decision making between brand and generic pharmacotherapies., (© 2019 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Background: Statutory rebates and preferred drug lists (PDLs) may result in differential use of biosimilars and generics between Medicaid fee-for-service (FFS) and managed care organizations (MCOs), particularly for branded drugs with large price increases subject to large inflation rebates, which are not retained by MCOs., Objective: To compare the use of 2 biosimilar/generics of branded drugs whose list price tripled in 2008-2018 across states with only FFS Medicaid, with MCOs not subject to statewide PDLs, with MCOs subject to statewide PDLs, and with MCOs where drug benefits have been carved out., Methods: Using 2018 Medicaid drug utilization data, we extracted reimbursement records in Q1-Q3 2018 for insulin glargine 100 IU/mL and glatiramer. We calculated the market share of the biosimilar insulin glargine and generic glatiramer among the corresponding drugs. We compared the market share of these products across 4 state groups: states with only FFS Medicaid, states with MCOs not subject to statewide PDLs for each drug, states with MCOs subject to PDLs, and states with MCOs where drug benefits have been carved out into FFS. We evaluated the correlation between state-level penetration of MCOs and share of biosimilar/generic products., Results: Nationally, the market share of these biosimilar/specialty generics was higher among MCOs than FFS (60.5% vs. 3.7% for biosimilar insulin glargine; 59.4% vs. 5.7% for generic glatiramer; all P < 0.001). The market share of these products was highest in states where MCOs were not subject to statewide PDLs for these drugs (59.1% for biosimilar insulin glargine, 52.8% for glatiramer) compared with states with MCOs subject to PDLs (2.4%, 18.0%); states with only FFS Medicaid (0.9%, 1.7%); or states where drug benefits have been carved out of MCOs (0.0%, 1.0%; all P < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between state-level MCO penetration and share of generic/biosimilar products (R = 0.50 for biosimilar insulin glargine and 0.57 for glatiramer; all P < 0.001)., Conclusions: For 2 drug classes with large price increases, use of biosimilars/generics was greater in MCOs than FFS Medicaid, specifically in states without PDL requirements for MCOs. These findings may reflect financial incentives for MCOs to use drugs with lower list prices because they do not benefit from statutory Medicaid rebates., Disclosures: No outside funding supported this study. Hernandez was funded by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (grant number K01HL142847). The authors have nothing to disclose.

Background: Wixela ® Inhub ® was developed to deliver inhaled fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/S) combination as a substitutable generic equivalent to Advair ® Diskus ® . These studies aimed to confirm the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence (BE) of FP/S after single doses of Wixela Inhub (test [T]) and Advair Diskus (reference [R]). Methods: Three open-label, randomized, two-way crossover, single-dose studies in healthy subjects ( N  = 66 each) compared the systemic exposure of FP and salmeterol after inhalation from three dose strengths of FP/S (100/50, 250/50, or 500/50 μg) delivered from T and R. Primary BE endpoints were the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time = 0 to the last measurable concentration (AUC (0-t) ) and the maximum observed plasma concentration (C max ) for both FP and S. The BE acceptance criteria specified that the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean T/R ratios for AUC (0-t) and C max can be contained within 0.80-1.25 for both FP and salmeterol. Results: Wixela Inhub met the acceptance criteria for BE for FP and salmeterol at each dose strength. Estimated AUC (0-t) and C max geometric mean ratios (T/R [90% CI]) for FP were, respectively, 1.04 (1.00-1.08) and 0.92 (0.87-0.96) for 100/50 μg FP/S, 1.07 (1.02-1.13) and 1.01 (0.95-1.07) for 250/50 μg, and 0.97 (0.92, 1.00) and 0.90 (0.86-0.93) for 500/50 μg. Estimated AUC (0-t) and C max ratios for salmeterol were, respectively, 1.08 (1.04-1.11) and 1.00 (0.94-1.04) for 100/50 μg FP/S, 1.03 (0.99-1.07) and 0.93 (0.87-1.00) for 250/50 μg, and 1.00 (0.96-1.04) and 0.86 (0.81-0.91) for 500/50 μg. FP/S at all doses via both T and R was comparably well tolerated. Conclusions: Wixela Inhub was bioequivalent to Advair Diskus at all three dose strengths for both FP and S, providing direct evidence of equivalent systemic safety and indirect evidence for equivalent pulmonary deposition.

The generic Mylan® etoposide (ETP) has been investigated as an alternative for Etopophos®, in part due to a global shortage of the latter. The generic alternative is different both in its formulation and in its very limited stability (6 h at 25 °C against 4 days for Etopophos®) once reconstituted in ready-to-use chloride or glucose solutions. Its intrinsic stability has been thoroughly studied under various conditions. Two degradation products resulting from hydrolysis were characterized by LC-HR-MS n and supported by density functional theory calculations of the frontier molecular orbitals energies, molecular electrostatic potential mapping, and Mulliken charge analysis. Chemical degradation increases with temperature and can be fitted to a zero order kinetic model with a half-life of 119 days and a kinetic constant of 0.0028 mM day -1 . Precipitation was only observed in solutions at 5 °C and -20 °C indicating that at these temperatures the reconstituted solutions are thermodynamically metastable. In conclusion, ETP at concentrations of 0.68 and 1 mM prepared and stored at 25 °C under good manufacturing practices remained unchanged over a period of 21 days irrespective of the nature of the solvents or the type of container., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the adherence to treatment, resource use, and costs in subjects initiating treatment with brand-name versus generic clopidogrel for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD)., Patients and Methods: Observational, retrospective study based on the medical records of patients aged ≥18 years who initiated treatment with clopidogrel (brand-name vs. generic) between 4 April 2015 and 31 March 2017. Four study groups were compared, and the follow-up was one year. The main measurements were: comorbidity, treatment adherence, medication possession ratio (MPR), resource use, and costs. The results were analysed using multivariate analysis. The level of statistical significance was P<.05., Results: Four groups were compared: a) ACS: brand-name clopidogrel (N=1,067) vs. generic (N=3,504), and b) PAD: brand-name clopidogrel (N=425) vs. generic (N=994). In the ACS comparison (mean age: 69.7 years, 61.4% male), adherence (65.3% vs. 61.0%, P<.001), adjusted hazard ratio 0.85 and MPR (89.8% vs. 86.7%, P=.045) were more superior with brand-name clopidogrel than with the generic and with a lower mean cost per unit (€2,890 vs. €3,865, P=.001). In the PAD comparison, similar results were observed: persistence (64.7% vs. 58.9%, P=.039); adjusted hazard-ratio 0.86 and MPR (88.6% vs. 81.7%; P=.013) were more superior with brand-name clopidogrel than for the generic, with a lower mean cost per unit (€2,880 vs. €3,532, P=.044)., Conclusions: There was better treatment adherence in patients initiating treatment with brand-name compared with generic clopidogrel for ACS and PAD, resulting in lower health costs for the Spanish National Health System., (Copyright © 2019 Sociedad Española de Médicos de Atención Primaria (SEMERGEN). Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Ideally, inhaled therapy is driven by the needs of specific disease management. Lung biology interfaces with inhaler performance to allow optimal delivery of therapeutic agent for disease treatment. Inhalation aerosol products consist of the therapeutic agent, formulation, and device. The manufacturing specifications on each of the components, and their combination, allow accurate and reproducible control of measures of quality and in-vitro performance. These product variables in combination with patient variables, including co-ordination skill during inhaler use, intrinsic lung biology, disease and consequent pulmonary function, contribute to drug safety and efficacy outcomes. Due to the complexity of pulmonary drug delivery, predicting biological outcomes from first principles has been challenging. Ongoing research appears to offer new insights that may allow accurate prediction of drug behavior in the lungs. Disruptive innovations were characteristic of research and development in inhaled drug delivery at the end of the last century. Although there were relatively few new inhaled products launched in the first decade of the new millennium it was evident that the earlier years of exploration resulted in maturation of commercially successful technologies. A significant increase in new and generic products has occurred in the last decade and technical, regulatory and disease management trends are emerging. Some of these developments can trace their origins to earlier periods of creativity in the field while others are a reflection of advances in other areas of basic and computer, sciences and engineering. Select biological and technical advances are highlighted with reflections on the potential to impact future clinical and regulatory considerations., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Rational medical prescription is a concern for the health systems and policies of African countries. The purpose of this study was to analyze the use of medicines in children aged 0 to 5 years receiving free care., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study considering the use of medicines in 20 randomly selected health facilities level 1 in Ouagadougou. The reference of the World Health Organization and of the International Network for the Rational Use of Drugs (WHO/INRUD) was used to analyze data. Descriptive statistics were used as the average and standard deviation. Differences were measured using ANOVA test., Results: In total, 1.206 prescriptions were reviewed between April 2016 and March 2017. The number of medicines issued on prescription was 2.9, the percentage of generic medicines prescribed was 88.7% and 97.7% of medicines prescribed were registered on the National List of Essential Medicines. The percentage of consultations during which antibiotics were prescribed was 83.2%, and 9.3% of prescriptions contained at least one injectable product., Conclusion: Irrational prescription is mainly relates to the use of antibiotics. Essential alertness should be given to the treatment of children less than 5 years to avoid an excessive consumption of medicines and the emergence of antibiotic resistance., Competing Interests: Les auteurs ne déclarent aucun conflit d’intérêts., (© Boukary Sana et al.)

Objectives: Drug price reduction is one of the major policies to restrain pharmaceutical expenses worldwide. This study explores whether there is a relationship between drug price and clinical quality using real-world data., Methods: Patients with newly-diagnosed type 2 diabetes receiving metformin or sulfonylureas during 2001 and 2010 were identified using the claim database of the Taiwan universal health insurance system. Propensity score matching was performed to obtain comparable subjects for analysis. Pharmaceutical products were categorized as brand-name agents (BD), highpriced generics (HP) or low-priced generics (LP). Indicators of clinical quality were defined as the dosage of cumulative oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA), exposure to other pharmacological classes of OHA, hospitalization or urgent visit for hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia, insulin utilization and diagnosis of diabetic complications within 1 year after diagnosis., Results: A total of 40,152 study subjects were identified. A generalized linear mix model showed that HP and BD users received similar OHA dosages with comparable clinical outcomes. By contrast, LP users had similar outcomes to BD users but received a 39% greater OHA dosage. A marginally higher risk of poor glycemic control in LP users was also observed., Conclusions: Drug price is related to indicators of clinical quality. Clinicians and health authorities should monitor the utilization, effectiveness and clinical safety indicators of generic drugs, especially those with remarkably low prices., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Imatinib is standard therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In February 2016, a generic formulation entered the US market. Physicians and patients are frequently concerned about whether switching from original to generic drugs may affect the efficacy and/or safety., Materials and Methods: This is an observational retrospective study using medical charts of patients diagnosed with CML in the chronic phase who were treated with original imatinib from the year 2000 to 2017 and who were subsequently switched to generic imatinib., Results: In this study, 38 patients have switched to generic imatinib. Before the switch, responses were assessed on all patients, all of them were in CCyR and 36 (95%) were in MMR, including 28 (74%) with MR4.5. Patients have received generic imatinib for a median of 19.4 (range, 3.4-46.3) months. Molecular responses after switching were stable in 89%, improved in 8%, and worsened in 3% of patients. After switching, 15 (39%) patients reported new or worsening adverse events, including 5 (13%) patients with edema, 8 (21%) muscle cramps, 7 (18%) nausea, 6 (16%) diarrhea, and 5 (13%) fatigue., Discussion: Bioequivalence studies demonstrated the same rate and extent of absorption of generic imatinib compared to the original form, which led to the FDA approval. In our observational series, most of the patients maintained their responses and none lost MMR. Adverse events noted were mild and well tolerated., Conclusion: A change from original to generic imatinib appears to maintain efficacy and be generally safe. More patients and longer follow-up are required to confirm these observations., (© 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aims: While several generic preparations of levodopa/carbidopa and levodopa/benserazide (LBD) are currently available, pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence and therapeutic equivalence studies with levodopa generics are not available in Italy. Lack of data on generic formulations is a critical factor for their limited use in this country and often lead patients to refuse the generic version of the branded drug., Methods: An experimental, 2-centre, randomized, double-blind, 2-sequence, noninferiority cross-over study was designed to evaluate both the PK equivalence and clinical equivalence of multiple doses of the generic preparation of LDB, Teva Italia, compared to the originator (Madopar). Forty-three out-patients with a diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease on LDB, were recruited and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 study sequences: generic-originator or originator-generic. Clinical evaluations were performed at the end of each study period. A PK study with an LDB fixed dose (100 + 25 mg) was performed in a subpopulation of 14 subjects., Results: Clinical data showed a reduction of 0.49 and 1.54 in the mean UPDRS III scores for the LDB and the originator, respectively. The 95% CIs [-2.21: 0.11] of the mean difference original vs LDB are smaller than the clinically significant difference of 3 UPDRS III points, supporting the conclusion that the treatment with LDB is not inferior to the originator. No statistically significant differences were found with respect to area under the curve to last dose, half-life, maximum concentration, time to maximum concentration and last observed concentration., Conclusion: These findings prove the therapeutic clinical equivalence as well the PK equivalence of the generic LDB and the originator (Madopar)., (© 2019 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Purpose: To compare adherence to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) between patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who initiated branded or generic imatinib., Methods: We used MarketScan commercial claims data (January 2011-June 2018) to identify patients with CML who newly initiated branded imatinib before 1 August 2015 or generic imatinib on or after 2 February 2016, and were continuously enrolled in health plans for 6 months before through 6 months following their initial fill. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, we compared adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC]) and persistence (no gaps ≥30 and ≥60 consecutive days in therapy) to TKI therapy., Results: Patients initiating generic imatinib consistently had higher average PDC per month and over the 6-month follow-up period than initiators of branded imatinib. Average 6-month PDC was 92% (95%CI:89%-94%) for generic initiators and 85% (95%CI:83%-86%) for brand initiators. Compared with branded imatinib initiators, a larger proportion of generic imatinib initiators were adherent and persistent to TKI therapy (PDC ≥ 90%:78% versus 64%; no≥60-day gap:94% versus 86%)., Conclusions: Patients initiating generic imatinib achieved clinically significant improvements in adherence to TKI therapy relative to branded drug users, presumably due to lower out-of-pocket costs. Given the importance of optimal adherence in CML, considering barriers to adherence (eg, patient-cost sharing and health benefit design) when selecting initial treatment may improve long-term medication adherence. Pharmacoepidemiologic studies should consider how best to account for expected cost-sharing and its impact on adherence and subsequent clinical outcomes., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Purpose: The aim of this study is to assess the bioequivalence of a new generic formulation and the branded formulation of levocetirizine dihydrochloride in healthy Chinese volunteers under fasting and fed conditions, and food-intake effect on the pharmacokinetic properties is also evaluated., Patients and Methods: Volunteers were randomly allocated into two groups to receive a single oral dose of generic formulation and branded formulation under fasting or fed conditions, respectively. Blood samples were collected at designated time points. Plasma concentrations of levocetirizine were determined by UFLC-MS/MS. Safety evaluations were carried out through the study. The main pharmacokinetic parameters of the two formulations of levocetirizine were calculated using non-compartmental analysis incorporated in WinNonlin ® 7.0 software., Results: Forty-nine volunteers were enrolled; 46 completed the studies. Under fasting and fed conditions, the 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean of generic/branded ratios were in the range of 94.75-107.24% and 99.98-114.69% for the maximum observed concentration, and 97.13-102.50% and 98.36-103.98% for the area under the concentration-time curve. As a result of food intake before administration, the reduced rate and extent of absorption of levocetirizine were observed. Both formulations were generally well tolerated, with no serious adverse reactions reported., Conclusion: The two formulations demonstrated essentially identical pharmacokinetic profiles and were all well within the FDA/CFDA bioequivalence standards. Meanwhile, food intake can delay the absorption rate and reduced the bioavailability of levocetirizine in healthy Chinese volunteers., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2019 Cheng et al.)

Objectives: To assess the availability and affordability of oral anti-diabetic medicines in Shaanxi Province, Western China., Methods: In 2015, the prices and availability of 8 anti-diabetic medicines covering 31 different dosage forms and strengths were collected in six cities of Shaanxi Province. A total of 72 public hospitals and 72 private pharmacies were sampled, using a modified methodology developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and Health Action International (HAI). Medicine prices were compared with international reference prices to obtain a median price ratio. For urban residents, affordability was assessed as the lowest-paid unskilled government workers to purchase cost of standard treatment in days' wages; for rural residents, days' net income was used., Results: The mean availabilities of originator brands (OBs) and generics were 34.3% and 28.7% in public hospitals, and 44.1% and 64.4% in the private pharmacies. OBs and the lowest priced generics (LPGs) were procured at 12.38 and 4.52 times the international reference price in public hospitals, and 10.26 and 2.81 times the international reference prices in private pharmacies. Treatments with OBs were unaffordable even for urban residents. The affordability of the LPGs was good, except for acarbose, repaglinide and pioglitazone., Conclusions: Most anti-diabetic medicines cannot met the WHO's availability target (80% availability) in Shaanxi Province. The high prices of OBs had severely influenced the affordability of medicines, especially for the rural residents. Effective policies should be initiated to ensure the Chinese people a better access to more affordable anti-diabetic medicines., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) approaches for highly variable drugs are based on linearly scaling the bioequivalence limits according to the reference formulation within-subject variability. RSABE methods have type I error control problems around the value where the limits change from constant to scaled. In all these methods, the probability of type I error has only one absolute maximum at this switching variability value. This allows adjusting the significance level to obtain statistically correct procedures (that is, those in which the probability of type I error remains below the nominal significance level), at the expense of some potential power loss. In this paper, we explore adjustments to the EMA and FDA regulatory RSABE approaches, and to a possible improvement of the original EMA method, designated as HoweEMA. The resulting adjusted methods are completely correct with respect to type I error probability. The power loss is generally small and tends to become irrelevant for moderately large (affordable in real studies) sample sizes., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Objectives : The economic crisis in Greece has triggered an extensive public debate about the use of generic drugs (generics). Despite their cost-saving potential, generic market penetration remains very low. This raises questions on awareness of, perception on and preference for generics by health-care professionals and patients. This is a descriptive study on the level of knowledge and attitudes towards generics of final year pharmacy school students in Greece. Methods : An electronic questionnaire was distributed to 173 senior pharmacy school students in three Universities in Greece. Responses were submitted electronically. Results : The majority of students knew that generics contain the same active ingredient as the originator products and are cheaper. Students were somehow concerned with safety and efficacy of generics. The majority of students agreed that pharmacists should probably recommend the use of generics, and indicated that prescribing and dispensing practices would largely depend on the profit margin. Despite more than half of the students expressing a positive attitude towards generics, they were inadequately educated on their features. Conclusion : It is critical to improve knowledge of and preference for generics amongst health-care professionals from early on if to build the trust required to increase generic market penetration and achieve measurable savings in pharmaceutical expenditure.

Sarpogrelate is widely used to treat peripheral vascular disorders. However, it has been demonstrated to have a poor pharmacokinetic (PK) profile and marked within-subject variability. Here, the bioequivalence of 2 formulations of sarpogrelate (100-mg tablets) was assessed by using the reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) method, and the PK parameters were quantified in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting (n = 38) and fed (n = 35) conditions. In this open and randomized 4-way replicate study, a single dose of sarpogrelate was administered followed by a 3-day washout period. The sarpogrelate concentration in blood samples was measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry within 6 hours (fasting) or 10 hours (fed) of drug administration, and the PK parameters were determined by a noncompartmental model. The bioequivalence of the 2 formulations under both conditions was assessed using the ratios of ln(peak concentration [C max ]) and ln(area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]) within the limits based on the RSABE method. The 90% CIs for the ratios of lnC max , lnAUC 0-t , and lnAUC 0-∞ were 0.8531-1.1100, 0.9616-1.0737, and 0.9550-1.0684, respectively, under fasting conditions and 0.8918-1.1076, 0.9818-1.0694, and 0.9818-1.0686, respectively, under fed conditions, which were within the RSABE acceptance limits. Food intake decreased the systemic exposure and the C max of sarpogrelate by 0.9-fold and 0.5-fold, respectively., (© 2018, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)