Search

Objective: To determine whether shock index (SI) is superior to traditional vital signs in predicting postpartum hemorrhage and need for intervention.Methods: Retrospective case-control study in an academic tertiary-care county hospital. Forty-one consecutive postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) cases and 41 controls were frequency-matched by mode of delivery and maternal weight. We measured four criteria: heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), SI (HR/SBP), and delta-SI (peak SI - baseline SI). Using received operating characteristic curves, we compared the discrimination performance of each criterion to predict PPH, transfusion, and surgical intervention, and identified thresholds with the strongest classification.Results: SI ≤1.1 can be normal in peripartum. Peak SI and delta-SI were generally superior to heart rate (HR) and SBP in predicting PPH, transfusion, and surgical intervention. SI ≥1.143 and SI ≥1.412 were strong initial and "critical" thresholds. Delta-SI was the strongest classifier overall; both SI and delta-SI remain sensitive and specific when adjusted for potential confounders.Conclusions: SI and delta-SI appear to be superior to HR and SBP in predicting PPH and need for intervention. Utility of delta-SI should be prospectively explored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective of this study is to compare patient outcomes between planned and emergent cesarean deliveries for placenta previa without morbidly adherent placenta.Study Design: All patients with confirmed, persistent placenta previa (without morbidly adherent placentation) who underwent the surgery between January 2010 and April 2016 were included in this retrospective study. Primary outcome was composite maternal morbidity defined as the presence of at least one of the followings: death, red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, hysterectomy, reoperation, hospital stay >7 d, ureteral injury, bowel injury, or cystotomy.Results: Three hundred and four patients with placenta previa were identified during the study period, of whom 154 (50.65%) had an antenatal and 10 (3.28%) had an intraoperative diagnosis of morbidly adherent placenta. One hundred and forty patients met the inclusion criteria. Eighty (57.1%) underwent planned cesarean delivery (planned cesarean delivery (PCD) group), and 60 (42.8%) required emergent cesarean delivery due to uterine contractions and/or bleeding (emergent cesarean delivery (ECD) group). Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups except for the gestational age at delivery (36.0 weeks (36.0, 37.0) in PCD versus 34.0 weeks (32.0, 36.0) in ECP, p < .001). Composite maternal morbidity was not significantly different between two groups: 11 (18.3%) in ECD and 10 (12.5%) in PCD (p = .35) Conclusions: In our referral tertiary centre, emergent and planned cesarean deliveries for placenta previa without morbidly adherent placenta have similar maternal outcomes. In patients without significant hemorrhage, delivery may be safely deferred until 36-37 weeks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cesarean delivery accounts for over one‐third of the ~400 000 annual births in Texas, with first‐time cesarean accounting for 20% of the overall cesareans. We examined associations of maternal medical comorbidities with cesarean delivery among nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex (NTSV) deliveries in Texas. Methods: Nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex deliveries to women aged 15‐49 years were identified using the 2015 Texas birth file (Center for Health Statistics, Texas Department of State Health Services). A risk factor index was constructed (score range 0‐4), including preexisting/gestational diabetes mellitus, preexisting/gestational hypertension/eclampsia, infertility treatment, smoking during pregnancy, and prepregnancy overweight/obesity, and categorized as 0, 1, 2, and 3+ based on the number of risk factors present. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between the categorized risk factor index and cesarean delivery, overall and by maternal race and ethnicity. Results: Among the 114 535 NTSV deliveries in Texas in 2015, 27.2% were by cesarean. The most prevalent maternal risk among all deliveries was prepregnancy overweight/obesity (42.4%). The odds of cesarean delivery increased significantly with increasing number of risk factors [one risk factor: 1.72 (95% CI 1.67‐1.78); two risk factors: 2.58 (95% CI 2.46‐2.71); and three or more risk factors: 3.91 (95% CI 3.45‐4.44)]. Discussion: In Texas in 2015, nearly half of NTSV deliveries had at least one maternal risk factor and the odds of cesarean delivery were significantly elevated for women with a higher risk index score. The findings from this study highlight the need for intervening during the preconception and interconception period as intrapartum care practices have an important influence on birth outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: While coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has had global impact in all populations, certain groups of patients have experienced disproportionate rates of morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between COVID-19 disease severity, demographic variables, race and ethnicity, and social determinants of health among pregnant patients in a diverse urban population., Study Design: A retrospective analysis was performed of all pregnant patients diagnosed with COVID-19 at two urban tertiary care centers in Houston, TX between March and August 2020. Maternal demographic, COVID-19 illness criteria, and delivery characteristics were collected. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and COVID-19 Community Vulnerability Index (CCVI) were obtained based on a patients' census tract of residence. Analyses compared persons with asymptomatic, mild, or severe-critical disease at diagnosis., Results: A total of 317 persons tested positive for COVID-19 during this time period. Asymptomatic persons were more likely to be diagnosed at later gestational ages, but there were no other differences in baseline maternal characteristics. Persons with more severe disease had greater social vulnerability specifically for housing and transportation than those with mild disease (mean SVI [standard error]: 0.72 [0.06] vs. 0.58 [0.2], p  = 0.03). Total SVI, total CCVI, and other themed SVI and CCVI indices were not significantly different between groups., Conclusion: In this cohort of pregnant persons infected with SARS-CoV-2, an association was shown between disease severity and increased vulnerability in living conditions and transportation. Drivers of the pandemic and COVID-19 outcomes are complex and multifactorial, and likely change over time. However, continued efforts to accurately identify and measure social determinants of health in medicine will likely help identify geographic areas and patient populations that are at risk of higher disease burden. This could facilitate preventative and mitigation measures in these areas in future disaster or pandemic situations., Key Points: · SVI and CCVI estimate social determinants of health.. · COVID-19 is associated with housing and transportation vulnerability.. · Social determinants contribute to disease burden in pregnancy.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Genital herpes is an infection with herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) or type 2 (HSV-2), and is among the most common sexually transmitted diseases., Methods and Outcomes: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of different oral antiviral treatments versus each other for a first episode of genital herpes in HIV-negative people? What are the effects of different antiviral treatments for genital herpes in HIV-positive people? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to October 2013 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)., Results: We found eight studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions., Conclusions: In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: aciclovir, famciclovir, and valaciclovir.