Search

AIM: To determine imatinib nonadherence rates in patients with gastrointestinal tumors (GIST) over 90 days. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective 90-day observational, open-label, multicenter study was carried out of 28 evaluable GIST patients on imatinib. Nonadherence behavior was measured using a 4-item patient interview. Clinicians, patients, and collaterals rated perceived patient adherence on a 0-100 VAS scale. RESULTS: Nonadherence rates in the 4 weeks prior to baseline and follow-up were 29% (95% CI=26-32) and 24% (95% CI=21-27, p>0.05). Mean VAS ratings of perceived adherence ranged from 95.2 ± 10.2 to 97.3 ± 4.8 (p>0.05 for time and source of rating). Correlations between perceptions of and actual adherence behavior were negative. CONCLUSION: In this first study on imatinib nonadherence in GIST patients, rates were similar to those observed in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, higher than clinically expected and exceeding meta-analytic estimates for cancer. Nonadherence rates were consistent across the 90-day period. Nonadherence behavior should be assessed by clinicians.

FIELT study group .Proceedings ASCO :A 7597. mai 2011, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

The use of chemotherapy regimens with moderate or high risk of febrile neutropenia (defined as having a FN incidence of 10% or more) and the respective incidence and clinical management of FN in breast cancer and NHL has not been studied in Belgium. The existence of a medical need for G-CSF primary and secondary prophylaxis with these regimens was investigated in a real-life setting. METHODS:Nine oncologists and six hematologists from different Belgian general hospitals and university centers were surveyed to collect expert opinion and real-life data (year 2007) on the use of chemotherapy regimens with moderate or high risk of febrile neutropenia and the clinical management of FN in patients aged <65 years with breast cancer or NHL. Data were retrospectively obtained, over a 6-month observation period. RESULTS:The most frequently used regimens in breast cancer patients (n = 161) were FEC (45%), FEC-T (37%) and docetaxel alone (6%). In NHL patients (n = 39), R-CHOP-21 (33%) and R-ACVBP-14 (15%) were mainly used. Without G-CSF primary prophylaxis (PP), FN occurred in 31% of breast cancer patients, and 13% had PSN. After G-CSF secondary prophylaxis (SP), 4% experienced further FN events. Only 1 breast cancer patient received PP, and did not experience a severe neutropenic event. Overall, 30% of chemotherapy cycles observed in breast cancer patients were protected by PP/SP. In 10 NHL patients receiving PP, 2 (20%) developed FN, whereas 13 (45%) of the 29 patients without PP developed FN and 3 (10%) PSN. Overall, 55% of chemotherapy cycles observed in NHL patients were protected by PP/SP. Impaired chemotherapy delivery (timing and/or dose) was reported in 40% (breast cancer) and 38% (NHL) of patients developing FN. Based on oncologist expert opinion, hospitalization rates for FN (average length of stay) without and with PP were, respectively, 48% (4.2 days) and 19% (1.5 days). Similar rates were obtained from hematologists. CONCLUSIONS:Despite the studied chemotherapy re

The use of chemotherapy regimens with moderate or high risk of febrile neutropenia (defined as having a FN incidence of 10% or more) and the respective incidence and clinical management of FN in breast cancer and NHL has not been studied in Belgium. The existence of a medical need for G-CSF primary and secondary prophylaxis with these regimens was investigated in a real-life setting., Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

We investigated the incidence of cardiac adverse events in patients with early breast cancer in the Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial who were treated with 1 year of trastuzumab after completion of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy., Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

PURPOSE: The 4-year results of this trial demonstrated that a higher dose of epirubicin with cyclophosphamide (HEC) is superior to a lower dose of epirubicin, 60 mg/m(2) (EC), for event-free survival (EFS; 27% reduction), but is not superior to classical oral cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) in the adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer. Herein we report the 15-year data on efficacy and long-term toxicity of this three-arm Belgian multicenter trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 1988 and December 1996, 777 eligible patients were randomly assigned to six cycles of CMF, eight cycles of EC, or eight cycles HEC. RESULTS: The 15-year EFS was 45% for patients who received CMF, 39% for patients who received EC, and 50% for patients who received HEC. The hazard ratios (HR) were 0.77 for HEC versus EC (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.98; P = .03), 0.90 for HEC versus CMF (P = .39), and 0.86 for EC versus CMF (P = .21). No difference in overall survival (OS) was seen. Cardiac toxicity was more frequent with HEC than with CMF (11 patients v 1 patient; P = .006), but no more than with EC (P = .21). CONCLUSION: Treatment with HEC demonstrated superior EFS when compared with lower-dose epirubicin. However, we do not recommend the use of HEC regimen in daily clinical practice, mainly because of the higher risk of cardiotoxicity related to the cumulative doses of epirubicin and the lack of superiority of anthracyclines over CMF in our study., Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

PURPOSE: The 4-year results of this trial demonstrated that a higher dose of epirubicin with cyclophosphamide (HEC) is superior to a lower dose of epirubicin, 60 mg/m(2) (EC), for event-free survival (EFS; 27% reduction), but is not superior to classical oral cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) in the adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer. Herein we report the 15-year data on efficacy and long-term toxicity of this three-arm Belgian multicenter trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 1988 and December 1996, 777 eligible patients were randomly assigned to six cycles of CMF, eight cycles of EC, or eight cycles HEC. RESULTS: The 15-year EFS was 45% for patients who received CMF, 39% for patients who received EC, and 50% for patients who received HEC. The hazard ratios (HR) were 0.77 for HEC versus EC (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.98; P = .03), 0.90 for HEC versus CMF (P = .39), and 0.86 for EC versus CMF (P = .21). No difference in overall survival (OS) was seen. Cardiac toxicity was more frequent with HEC than with CMF (11 patients v 1 patient; P = .006), but no more than with EC (P = .21). CONCLUSION: Treatment with HEC demonstrated superior EFS when compared with lower-dose epirubicin. However, we do not recommend the use of HEC regimen in daily clinical practice, mainly because of the higher risk of cardiotoxicity related to the cumulative doses of epirubicin and the lack of superiority of anthracyclines over CMF in our study., Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Purpose : A recent study identified a prognostic model for survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients which included WBC count, alkaline phosphatase (AP), number of metastatic sites, and patients' self-reported social functioning. The aim of this research is to validate this model on data from an independent sample. Patients and Methods : This validation study is based on a prospective randomized controlled trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer conducted by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Chronotherapy Group. Overall, 564 patients in 10 countries were enrolled. For the purpose of this independent validation, patients with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) baseline data were analyzed. HRQOL was assessed using the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30). The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for both univariate and multivariate analyses of survival. Results : The previous model with an additional adjustment, by stratification for sex, was replicated and its parameters were confirmed to independently predict survival: WBC count with an hazard ratio (HR) of 1.31 (95% CI, 1.021 to 1.698; P = .034); AP with an HR of 1.53 (95% CI, 1.188 to 1.979; P = .001); number of sites involved with an HR of 1.90 (95% CI, 1.531 to 2.364; P < .0001); and patients' self-reported social functioning with an HR of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.905 to 0.976; P = .001). The latter translates into a 6% increase in the likelihood of an earlier death for every 10-point decrease in the social functioning scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Conclusion : This study provides confirmatory evidence of the independent prognostic value of patients' self-reported social functioning in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Purpose In two previous randomized trials, the adjustment of chemotherapy delivery to circadian rhythms improved tolerability and anticancer activity compared with constant-rate infusion during 5 days in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods For this multicenter randomized trial, it was hypothesized that a chronomodulated infusion of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin for 4 days (chronoFLO4) would improve survival by 10% compared with conventional 2-day delivery of the same drugs (FOLFOX2). Patients were treated every 2 weeks with intrapatient dose escalation. Results Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms for the 564 patients (36 institutions, 10 countries). Median survival was 19.6 months (95% confidence limit [CL] 18.2, 21.2) with chronoFLO4 and 18.7 months with FOLFOX2 (95% CL = 17.7, 21.0; P = .55). The main dose-limiting toxicities were diarrhea for chronoFLO4 and neutropenia for FOLFOX2. The analysis of survival predictors showed that sex was the single most important factor (P = .001). In women, the risk of an earlier death with chronoFLO4 was increased by 38% compared with FOLFOX2, with median survival times of 16.3 and 19.1 months (P = .03), respectively. In men, the risk of death was decreased by 25% with chronoFLO4 compared with FOLFOX2, with median survival times of 21.4 and 18.3 months (P = .02), respectively. Conclusion Both regimens achieved similar median survival times more than 18 months with an acceptable toxicity. The chronomodulated schedule produced a survival advantage over FOLFOX in men. The strong sex dependency of optimal scheduling of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin calls for translational investigations of determinants related to the patient's molecular clock.

Background: In early breast cancer, variations in local treatment that substantially affect the risk of locoregional recurrence could also affect long-term breast cancer mortality. To examine this relationship, collaborative meta-analyses were undertaken, based on individual patient data, of the relevant randomised trials that began by 1995. Methods: Information was available on 42 000 women in 78 randomised treatment comparisons (radiotherapy vs no radiotherapy, 23 500; more vs less surgery, 9300; more surgery vs radiotherapy, 9300). 24 types of local treatment comparison were identified. To help relate the effect on local (ie, locoregional) recurrence to that on breast cancer mortality, these were grouped according to whether or not the 5-year local recurrence risk exceeded 10% (<10%, 17 000 women; >10%, 25 000 women). Findings: About three-quarters of the eventual local recurrence risk occurred during the first 5 years. In the comparisons that involved little (<10%) difference in 5-year local recurrence risk there was little difference in 15-year breast cancer mortality. Among the 25 000 women in the comparisons that involved substantial (>10%) differences, however, 5-year local recurrence risks were 7% active versus 26% control (absolute reduction 19%), and 15-year breast cancer mortality risks were 44.6% versus 49.5% (absolute reduction 5.0%, SE 0.8, 2p<0.00001). These 25 000 women included 7300 with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in trials of radiotherapy (generally just to the conserved breast), with 5-year local recurrence risks (mainly in the conserved breast, as most had axillary clearance and node-negative disease) 7% versus 26% (reduction 19%), and 15-year breast cancer mortality risks 30.5% versus 35.9% (reduction 5.4%, SE 1.7, 2p=0.0002; overall mortality reduction 5.3%, SE 1.8, 2p=0.005). They also included 8500 with mastectomy, axillary clearance, and node-positive disease in trials of radiotherapy (generally to the chest wall and regional lymph nod, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

PURPOSE: To compare a full-dose epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (HEC) regimen with classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) therapy and with a moderate-dose epirubicin-cyclophosphamide regimen (EC) in the adjuvant therapy of node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Node-positive breast cancer patients who were aged 70 years or younger were randomly allocated to one of the following treatments: CMF for six cycles (oral cyclophosphamide); EC for eight cycles (epirubicin 60 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2); day 1 every 3 weeks); and HEC for eight cycles (epirubicin 100 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 830 mg/m(2); day 1 every 3 weeks). RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-five, 267, and 255 eligible patients were treated with CMF, EC, and HEC, respectively. Patient characteristics were well balanced among the three arms. One and three cases of congestive heart failure were reported in the EC and HEC arms, respectively. Three cases of acute myeloid leukemia were reported in the HEC arm. After 4 years of median follow-up, no statistically significant differences were observed between HEC and CMF (event-free survival [EFS]: hazards ratio [HR] = 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 1.31, P =.80; distant-EFS: HR = 0.97, 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.34, P =.87; overall survival [OS]: HR = 0.97, 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.44, P =.87). HEC is more effective than EC (EFS: HR = 0.73, 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.99, P =.04; distant-EFS: HR = 0.75, 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.02, P =.06; OS HR = 0.69, 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.00, P =.05). CONCLUSION: This three-arm study does not show an advantage in favor of an adequately dosed epirubicin-based regimen over classical CMF in the adjuvant therapy of node-positive pre- and postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Moreover, this study confirms that there is a dose-response curve for epirubicin in breast cancer adjuvant therapy., Clinical Trial, Clinical Trial, Phase III, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

BACKGROUND: The predictive role of HER-2 in node-positive breast cancer patients receiving CMF or an anthracycline-based adjuvant therapy remains unclear. In addition, topo-isomerase II alpha (topo IIalpha), as the cellular target of anthracyclines, might have value as a predictive marker. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred eighty-one archival primary tumor samples were collected among 777 patients entered into a multicenter phase III trial comparing classical CMF with epirubicin cyclophosphamide (HEC) as adjuvant therapy of node-positive breast cancer. HER-2 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using different antibodies (Abs). Topo IIalpha was evaluated by IHC using the Ab KiS 1. In each subgroup of patients identified by HER-2 and topo IIalpha, adjusted hazard ratios for event-free survival (EFS) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals have been calculated for the different study comparisons. An interaction test has been performed to investigate the role of HER-2 and topo IIalpha as predictive markers. RESULTS: When HER-2 was evaluated by CB-11 and 4D5 mAbs, the EFS adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for the main study comparison HEC vs. CMF were: HER-2 positive: 0.33 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.09 1.27, P = 0.08), HER-2 negative: 1.16 (95%, CI: 0.71-1.90, P = 0.56); the P-value for the interaction test was 0.10. When HER-2 was evaluated by TAB-250 + pAbl Abs, the adjusted HR for the same comparison were: HER-2 positive: 1.06 (95% CI: 0.45-2.52, P = 0.90), HER-2 negative: 0.99 (95% CI: 0.58-1.68, P = 0.97); the P-value for the interaction test was 0.84. With regard to topo IIalpha, the adjusted HR for the EFS comparison HEC vs. CMF were: topo IIalpha positive: 0.66 (95% CI: 0.32-1.36, P = 0.25), topo IIalpha negative: 1.26 (95% CI: 0.63-2.50, P = 0.51); the P-value for the interaction test was 0.13. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that in node-positive breast cancer patients randomly treated with CMF or an epirubicin-based regimen, the predictive, Clinical Trial, Clinical Trial, Phase III, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

BACKGROUND: A phase I dose-escalation study of a new formulation of oral vinorelbine was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a once weekly regimen and preliminary pharmacokinetic profile in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). Twenty-six patients were treated at dose levels ranging from 60 to 100 mg/m2/week. Pharmacokinetics was assessed during the first administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients had histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer and had received no more than two prior chemotherapy regimens for ABC. RESULTS: The MTD was 100 mg/m2/week due to the occurrence of dose-limiting neutropenia, nausea/vomiting and constipation in five of six patients. Toxicities at 80 mg/m2/week were manageable, neutropenia being the main toxicity (grade 3-4 seen in 10 of 13 patients). Nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea were common but rarely severe. Vinorelbine was rapidly absorbed with maximum blood concentration (Cmax) of 103.8 +/- 41.6 ng x ml(-1) observed 1.2 +/- 0.8 hours (Tmax) after administration of 80 mg/m2. Pharmacokinetic exposure increased linearly with dose. Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and concentration measured 24 hours after drug intake (C24h) were significantly correlated with depletion of neutrophils. Objective tumour responses were reported in 6 of the 14 evaluable patients treated at doses > or = 80 mg/m2/week. CONCLUSION: The safety profile of oral vinorelbine appears comparable to that of intravenous dosing. The recommended phase II dose is 80 mg/m2/week and requires regular monitoring of neutrophil counts., Clinical Trial, Clinical Trial, Phase I, Journal Article, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published