51. Factors influencing changes in the signal-averaged electrocardiogram within the first year after a first myocardial infarction
- Author
-
Joep L.R.M. Smeets, Kostas Loutsidis, Pieter A. Doevendans, Jacques Metzger, Adri van den Dool, Luz-Maria Rodriguez, Christian de Chillou, Frits W. Bär, and Hein J.J. Wellens
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty ,Myocardial Infarction ,Myocardial Ischemia ,First myocardial infarction ,Electrocardiography ,Recurrence ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Life Tables ,Myocardial infarction ,Prospective Studies ,Prospective cohort study ,Aged ,Ejection fraction ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Electrocardiography in myocardial infarction ,Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Signal-averaged electrocardiogram ,Cardiology ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
One hundred twenty-nine patients were prospectively studied after a first myocardial infarction. A first signal-averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG-1) was performed in the acute phase (within 48 hours after onset of symptoms) and a second one (SAECG-2) in the late phase (6 to 18 months after hospital discharge). We studied the influence of nine parameters on the evolution of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram: age, gender, myocardial infarction location, number of diseased coronary vessels, infarct-related coronary artery patency, use of thrombolytic therapy or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the acute phase, left ventricular ejection fraction, and recurrence of ischemic events. No follow-up data were available in 15 patients. Of the remaining 114 patients, an ischemic event occurred in 25 (22%). The signal-averaged electrocardiogram remained unchanged in 97 (85%) (remaining normal in 78 and abnormal in 19). It became abnormal in 13 (11.5%) and became normal in 4 (3.5%). In patients with a normal SAECG-1, two factors were associated with the change to an abnormal SAECG-2: (1) an ischemic event occurred in 11 (85%) of 13 patients whose SAECG-2 was abnormal compared with only 13 (17%) of 78 patients whose SAECG-2 remained normal (p < 0.0001), and (2) 100% of patients with an abnormal SAECG-2 had an inferior myocardial infarction compared with 54% of patients with a normal SAECG-2 (p = 0.004).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
- Published
- 1994