Search

Objective: To examine the efficacy of ziprasidone vs. placebo for the depressive mixed state in patients with bipolar disorder type II or major depressive disorder (MDD)., Methods: 73 patients were randomized in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to ziprasidone (40-160 mg/d) or placebo for 6 weeks. They met DSM-IV criteria for a major depressive episode (MDE), while also meeting 2 or 3 (but not more nor less) DSM-IV manic criteria. They did not meet DSM-IV criteria for a mixed or manic episode. Baseline psychotropic drugs were continued unchanged. The primary endpoint measured was Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores over time. The mean dose of ziprasidone was 129.7±45.3 mg/day and 126.1±47.1 mg/day for placebo., Results: The primary outcome analysis indicated efficacy of ziprasidone versus placebo (p = 0.0038). Efficacy was more pronounced in type II bipolar disorder than in MDD (p = 0.036). Overall ziprasidone was well tolerated, without notable worsening of weight or extrapyramidal symptoms., Conclusions: There was a statistically significant benefit with ziprasidone versus placebo in this first RCT of any medication for the provisional diagnostic concept of the depressive mixed state., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00490542.

Background: Although transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be an effective acute antidepressant treatment, few studies systematically examine persistence of benefit., Objective: We assessed the durability of antidepressant effect after acute response to TMS in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) using protocol-specified maintenance antidepressant monotherapy., Methods: Three hundred one patients were randomly assigned to active or sham TMS in a 6-week, controlled trial. Nonresponders could enroll in a second, 6-week, open-label study. Patients who met criteria for partial response (i.e., >25% decrease from the baseline HAMD 17) during either the sham-controlled or open-label study (n = 142) were tapered off TMS over 3 weeks, while simultaneously starting maintenance antidepressant monotherapy. Patients were then followed for 24 weeks in a naturalistic follow-up study examining the long-term durability of TMS. During this durability study, TMS was readministered if patients met prespecified criteria for symptom worsening (i.e., a change of at least one point on the CGI-S scale for 2 consecutive weeks). Relapse was the primary outcome measure., Results: Ten of 99 (10%; Kaplan-Meier survival estimate = 12.9%) patients relapsed. Thirty-eight (38.4%) patients met criteria for symptom worsening and 32/38 (84.2%) reachieved symptomatic benefit with adjunctive TMS. Safety and tolerability were similar to acute TMS monotherapy., Conclusions: These initial data suggest that the therapeutic effects of TMS are durable and that TMS may be successfully used as an intermittent rescue strategy to preclude impending relapse., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Randomized controlled trials support the antidepressant efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS); however, there is individual variability in the magnitude of response. Examination of response predictors has been hampered by methodological limitations such as small sample sizes and single-site study designs. Data from a multisite sham-controlled trial of the antidepressant efficacy of TMS provided an opportunity to examine predictors of acute outcome. An open-label extension for patients who failed to improve provided the opportunity for confirmatory analysis. Treatment was administered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at 10 pulses per second, 120% of motor threshold, for a total of 3000 pulses per day. Change on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale after 4 weeks was the primary efficacy outcome. A total of 301 patients with nonpsychotic unipolar major depression at 23 centers were randomized to active or sham TMS. Univariate predictor analyses showed that the degree of prior treatment resistance in the current episode was a predictor of positive treatment outcome in both the controlled study and the open-label extension trial. In the randomized trial, shorter duration of current episode was also associated with a better outcome. In the open-label extension study, absence of anxiety disorder comorbidity was associated with an improved outcome, but duration of current episode was not. The number of prior treatment failures was the strongest predictor for positive response to acute treatment with TMS. Shorter duration of current illness and lack of anxiety comorbidity may also confer an increased likelihood of good antidepressant response to TMS.

Anticonvulsants are frequently used in the treatment of affective illnesses, especially for patients refractory to or intolerant of other treatments. The differential therapeutic roles of anticonvulsants, however, remain largely undetermined. The author reviews the available efficacy data for carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, valproate, lamotrigine, gabapentin and topiramate. Valproate is efficacious in the monotherapy of acute manic presentations but confirmatory evidence of the efficacy of valproate in long-term maintenance has been elusive. Valproate and possibly carbamazepine, may provide a therapeutic advantage over lithium in non-classic bipolar conditions such as mixed mood states and rapid cycling conditions. Lamotrigine is unique among the anticonvulsants in its monotherapy efficacy for bipolar I depression. Emerging data also suggest a role for lamotrigine in the adjunctive treatment of depressive mixed states and rapid cycling conditions in the absence of prominent manic symptoms. Controlled trials have found gabapentin ineffective for acute mania and refractory bipolar conditions. The role of gabapentin in the treatment of other aspects of affective illness remains uncertain. Definitive statements regarding the differential psychotropic use of topiramate and oxcarbazepine are not possible, though active investigation is underway to better characterise the utility of topiramate. The author suggests that current diagnostic models utilised in controlled trials may limit identification of differential therapeutic benefits. Caution is advised in generalising from the ability or inability of an agent to demonstrate antimanic activity. Future studies of newer anticonvulsants should include dimensional perspectives and soft bipolar presentations, as the greatest contribution of the newer anticonvulsants may be in treatment of mood conditions other than acute mania.

Lower extremity symptoms are caused by lesions at any level of the neuraxis, from cortex to muscle. HIV affects virtually every level of the nervous system, either directly or indirectly. The presence of pathology at multiple levels and by multiple processes further complicates the bedside diagnosis of a patient with AIDS and neurologic symptoms. Many neuropathies and other conditions that affect the lower extremities can be identified with careful history and physical examination, confirmed with limited testing, and can be treated successfully. Distal symmetric polyneuropathy is the most common lower extremity disorder, but it must be distinguished from similar-appearing neuropathies caused by medications, B12 deficiency, or vasculitis. Diffuse infiltrative lymphocytosis syndrome also causes a painful peripheral neuropathy that must be distinguished from distal symmetric polyneuropathy. Inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathies are characterized by muscle weakness. They occur in early, asymptomatic HIV infection and respond to plasmapheresis or steroids. Mononeuropathies in patients with CD4 counts more than 200 often resolve on their own. Multiple mononeuropathies, which occur in patients with CD4 counts less than 50, are often associated with cytomegalovirus infection and may follow a rapidly progressive course unless treated promptly and aggressively. Progressive polyradiculopathy occurs late in the course of AIDS, is often caused by cytomegalovirus, is rapidly progressive, and generally is fatal unless recognized and treated promptly. Muscle weakness, myalgia, and fatigue are common in HIV and have multiple causes. Lower extremity spasticity may be caused by treatable etiologies such as spinal cord abscess, tumor, disc compression, B12 deficiency, or ischemia. Gait disturbances are common but nonspecific and may be caused by treatable neurologic disorders at any level of the neuraxis.

The vast majority of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) have symptoms or signs involving the feet and lower extremities. Patients presenting to podiatrists with foot complaints may, in fact, have neurologic complications of HIV originating in any level of the neuraxis, and multiple levels may be involved. These include multiple classes of peripheral neuropathy and myopathy, inflammatory radiculopathy, myelopathy, and central nervous system lesions caused by direct HIV infection or opportunistic infections. Common complaints such as pain, numbness, burning, tingling, weakness, cramps, unsteady gait, and others should be systematically evaluated with both podiatric and neurologic etiologies in mind for early diagnosis and intervention.

This article will review the current literature on the wide range of neuropsychiatric symptoms and syndromes seen in HIV illness. It will then describe the literature and the authors' experience in the use of psychotropic medications in this illness.