51. Assessment of still and moving images in the diagnosis of gastric lesions using magnifying narrow-band imaging in a prospective multicenter trial
- Author
-
Youhei Marukawa, Hiroshi Kurumaya, Shuichi Terasaki, Kunihiro Tsuji, Takaharu Masunaga, Kazuhiro Miwa, Yukihiro Shirota, Hajime Ohta, Hirokazu Tsuji, Hisashi Doyama, Toshihide Okada, Tomoyuki Hayashi, Yoshibumi Kaneko, Yutaka Matano, and Shuichi Kaneko
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,lcsh:Medicine ,Gastroenterology and Hepatology ,Carcinomas ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Stomach Neoplasms ,Multicenter trial ,Adenocarcinomas ,Gastrointestinal Cancers ,Gastrointestinal Tumors ,Gastroscopy ,medicine ,Medicine and Health Sciences ,Cancer Detection and Diagnosis ,Humans ,Prospective Studies ,Prospective cohort study ,lcsh:Science ,Multidisciplinary ,Narrow-band imaging ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Significant difference ,lcsh:R ,Cancers and Neoplasms ,Gastric lesions ,Adenomas ,Endoscopy ,Clinical trial ,Gastric Cancer ,Oncology ,Case-Control Studies ,Female ,lcsh:Q ,Radiology ,business ,Cohort study ,Research Article - Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Magnifying narrow-band imaging (M-NBI) is more accurate than white-light imaging for diagnosing small gastric cancers. However, it is uncertain whether moving M-NBI images have additional effects in the diagnosis of gastric cancers compared with still images. DESIGN: A prospective multicenter cohort study. METHODS: To identify the additional benefits of moving M-NBI images by comparing the diagnostic accuracy of still images only with that of both still and moving images. Still and moving M-NBI images of 40 gastric lesions were obtained by an expert endoscopist prior to this prospective multicenter cohort study. Thirty-four endoscopists from ten different Japanese institutions participated in the prospective multicenter cohort study. Each study participant was first tested using only still M-NBI images (still image test), then tested 1 month later using both still and moving M-NBI images (moving image test). The main outcome was a difference in the diagnostic accuracy of cancerous versus noncancerous lesions between the still image test and the moving image test. RESULTS: Thirty-four endoscopists were analysed. There were no significant difference of cancerous versus noncancerous lesions between still and moving image tests in the diagnostic accuracy (59.9% versus 61.5%), sensitivity (53.4% versus 55.9%), and specificity (67.0% versus 67.6%). And there were no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy between still and moving image tests of demarcation line (65.4% versus 65.5%), microvascular pattern (56.7% versus 56.9%), and microsurface pattern (48.1% versus 50.9%). Diagnostic accuracy showed no significant difference between the still and moving image tests in the subgroups of endoscopic findings of the lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of moving M-NBI images to still M-NBI images does not improve the diagnostic accuracy for gastric lesions. It is reasonable to concentrate on taking sharp still M-NBI images during endoscopic observation and use them for diagnosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Umin.ac.jp UMIN-CTR000008048.
- Published
- 2014