Search

The use of herbal supplements for improved sexual performance is a common practice amongst the youth and some senior citizens in Ghana. These products are considered ‘natural’ and greatly preferred over synthetic alternatives due to the assurance of little to no adverse effects by producers. However, the high rate of adulteration often compromises their safety. Forty herbal supplements, of which 25 were previously shown to result in medium to high intake of phosphodiesterase type-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors using a PDE-Glo bioassay, were further investigated using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) analysis to examine the reliability of the bioassay and whether the observed higher responses could be ascribed to inherent plant constituents or adulterants. Results showed significant amounts of vardenafil, tadalafil and especially sildenafil, in 2, 1 and 10 samples, respectively, with total concentration levels resulting in estimated daily intakes (EDIs) above 25 mg sildenafil equivalents with six supplements even having EDIs above 100 mg sildenafil equivalents. Only one sample contained a natural ingredient (icariin), but its concentration (0.013 mg g−1) was too low to explain the observed potency in the bioassay. The estimated concentrations of PDE-5 inhibitors in 35 supplements, according to the bioassay, were in line with those of the LC–MS/MS analysis. However, discrepancies were observed for five supplements. Further examination of one of the latter supplements using the PDE-Glo bioassay to select the positive fraction and further examination with LC–MS/MS and 1H-NMR revealed the presence of hydroxythiohomosildenafil, a sildenafil analogue not yet included in the liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry reference library. This study demonstrates the significance of applying a tiered approach, where the use of a bioassay is followed by chemical analysis of bioactive samples in order to identify unknown bioactive compounds.

On behalf of the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (LNV), Wageningen Food Safety Research (WFSR) analyses samples of agricultural products of animal origin for dioxins, PCBs, brominated flame retardants (BFRs) and poly- and perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs). This includes meat, milk, eggs and fish. The samples are taken at the primary production or processing stage (e.g. in slaughterhouses or raw milk collection services). For dioxin-like compounds, 350 samples are screened first with the DR CALUX® method. Samples giving a signal indicating a level above the lowest action level are regarded as suspected. These samples are further examined using GC/HRMS as confirmatory method. Concerning fish, shellfish and crustaceans, approx. 25 samples are collected at sea by research vessels, at the fish auction, or from whole-sale traders (farmed fish).

Between 1999 and 2020, there were twelve rapid alerts on dioxins in palm fatty acid distillate (PFAD) products, six of which were associated with hydrogenated palm fatty acid distillates (HPFADs). In palm oil refineries for food and feed, refined palm oil and PFADs can be processed into hydrogenated palm oil and HPFADs. This study investigated the effect of hydrogenation of palm oil products which contain OCDD and impact on the profiles of dioxins in palm oil products and on the toxic equivalent (TEQ) level. Palm oil and PFADs were spiked with octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (OCDD) and hydrogenated at different pressures, temperatures, and catalyst conditions. Initially, the concentrations of the lower-chlorinated dioxin congeners, some with a higher toxic equivalency factor, increased. Consequently, the TEQ levels increased and exceeded the regulatory limit. However, further hydrogenation extended the dechlorination of dioxins resulting in decreased TEQ levels. Optimisation of the hydrogenation process is required to reduce the risk of exceeding the limits on dioxins.

On behalf of the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (LNV), Wageningen Food Safety Research analyses samples of agricultural products of animal origin for dioxins, PCBs, brominated flame retardants (BFRs) and poly- and perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs). This includes meat, milk, eggs and fish. The samples are taken at the primary production or processing stage (e.g. in slaughterhouses or raw milk collection services). For dioxin-like compounds, 350 samples are first screened with the DR CALUX® method. Samples giving a signal indicating a level above the lowest action level are regarded as suspected. These samples are further examined using GC/HRMS as confirmatory method. Concerning fish, shellfish and crustaceans, approx. 25 samples are collected at sea by research vessels, at the fish auction, or from whole-sale traders (farmed fish).

On behalf of the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (LNV), Wageningen Food Safety Research analyses samples of agricultural products of animal origin for dioxins, PCBs, brominated flame retardants (BFRs) and poly- and perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs). This includes meat, milk, eggs and fish. The samples are taken at the primary production or processing stage (e.g. in slaughterhouses or raw milk collection services). For dioxin-like compounds, 350 samples are first screened with the DR CALUX® method. Samples giving a signal indicating a level above the lowest action level are regarded as suspected. These samples are further examined using GC/HRMS as confirmatory method. Concerning fish, shellfish and crustaceans, approx. 25 samples are collected at sea by research vessels, at the fish auction, or from whole-sale traders (farmed fish).

On behalf of the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (LNV), Wageningen Food Safety Research analyses samples of agricultural products of animal origin for dioxins, PCBs, brominated flame retardants (BFRs) and poly- and perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs). This includes meat, milk, eggs and fish. The samples are taken at the primary production or processing stage (e.g. in slaughterhouses or raw milk collection services). For dioxin-like compounds, 350 samples are first screened with the DR CALUX® method. Samples giving a signal indicating a level above the lowest action level are regarded as suspected. These samples are further examined using GC/HRMS as confirmatory method. Concerning fish, shellfish and crustaceans, approx. 25 samples are collected at sea by research vessels, at the fish auction, or from whole-sale traders (farmed fish).

Annexes to the Risk to human health related to the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances in food Annex A - Occurrence and exposure data Annex B - Distribution of analytical results Annex C - Comparison of PFOA and PFOS occurrence and exposure data with previous assessment (EFSA CONTAM Panel, 2018). Also the raw (no data cleaning applied to it) occurrence dataset as extracted from EFSA DWH is provided in csv format. This dataset is compliant with EFSA SSD model and contains two additional columns documenting issues identified in the cleaning process (column: issue) and the action taken (column: action) to address the issue (e.g. delete record or update values in specific fields).

UPDATE to version 2 of this upload: Also the raw (no data cleaning applied to it) occurrence dataset as extracted from EFSA DWH is provided in csv format. This dataset is compliant with EFSA SSD model and contains two additional columns documenting issues identified in the cleaning process (column: issue) and the action taken (column: action) to address the issue (e.g. delete record or update values in specific fields). Description - Version 1 Annex: Tables on GAs on occurrence data in food and feed, and dietary exposure assessment for humans Table A.1. Dietary surveys used for the estimation of acute dietary exposure to GA Table A.2. Number of results and samples per food category submitted to EFSA through the continuous call for data Table A.3. Analytical results excluded from the final dataset used to estimate dietary exposure and the criteria applied for exclusion Table A.4. Occurrence of alpha-chaconine and alpha-solanine (UB mg/kg) in the samples included in the final dataset (left censored results highlighted in yellow) Table A.5. European Starch Association data on feed and potatoes for starch Table A.6. Details acute assessment across surveys (consumption days only) Table A.7. Comparison of exposure summary results obtained using the uniform vs the normal distribution for reduction factors

The annexes A to E to the Scientific Opinion on Aflatoxins in Food included in the upload are excel files as follows: Annex A: Dietary surveys per country and age group available in the EFSA Comprehensive Database, considered in the exposure assessment Annex B: Occurrence data on aflatoxins Annex C: Proportion of left-censored data and the mean concentrations of the quantified analytical results of AFB1 for pistachios, hazelnuts, peanuts, other nuts and dried figs Annex D: AFB1 and AFM1 concentrations reported for organic farming and conventional farming in selected food categories Annex E: Mean and high chronic dietary exposure to aflatoxins per survey and the contribution of different food groups to the dietary exposure

This Annex is an excel file presenting tables on occurrence data on nitrate and nitrite in feed. Contains the raw (no data cleaning applied to it) occurrence dataset on nitrate and nitrite as extracted from EFSA DWH on 03 December 2019 in feed samples presented in the opinion as described in its section 3.2.2. The data is provided in csv format. This dataset is compliant with EFSA SSD model and contains two additional columns documenting issues identified in the cleaning process (column: issue) and the action taken (column: action) to address the issue (e.g. delete record or update values in specific fields).

To investigate the transfer of pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) from feed to milk, rumen-cannulated dairy cows were intra-ruminally fed with 200 g/day of dried plant material of either ragwort (mixture of Jacobaea vulgaris and Senecio inaequidens), common groundsel (Senecio vulgaris) or viper’s bugloss (Echium vulgare) for a period of 4 days. PA levels in the plant materials were 3767, 2792 and 1674 µg g−1 respectively. Feed intake, milk yield and several blood parameters indicative for liver function were not influenced by the treatment. When fed ragwort, increased levels of PAs were detected in the milk, in particular jacoline and an unidentified cyclic diester, possibly a hydroxylated metabolite from retrorsine. The latter was the most important PA in milk from cows fed common groundsel. For viper’s bugloss, echimidine was the most abundant identified PA but in addition several hydroxylated PA metabolites were detected. For ragwort, the overall PA transfer was estimated at 0.05% and 1.4% for jacoline (N-oxide). Transfer rates were similar for viper’s bugloss (0.05%) but lower for common groundsel (0.01%). Only a small portion of the administered PAs was quantified in milk, urine and faeces, with an overall balance of 4.5%, 2.9% and 5.8%, for ragwort, common groundsel and viper’s bugloss, respectively. Samples taken from the rumen indicated that the N-oxides were converted into the free bases, which was confirmed by in vitro studies with the same plant species incubated with ruminal fluid. These results confirm that the transfer of PAs to milk is relatively low but may be of concern for human health regarding the genotoxic and carcinogenic properties of these compounds. The transfer rate depends on the type of PAs present in the weeds. The incomplete balance of input vs output stresses the need to further investigate the metabolism and the potential transfer of metabolites into edible products.