Search

Your search keyword '"Jagsi, Reshma"' showing total 2,355 results
Start Over Author "Jagsi, Reshma"
2,355 results on '"Jagsi, Reshma"'

51. Sex Differences in Salaries of Department Chairs at Public Medical Schools.

Author

Mensah, Michael, Beeler, Whitney, Rotenstein, Lisa, Jagsi, Reshma, Spetz, Joanne, Linos, Eleni, and Mangurian, Christina

Subjects
Humans, Sex Factors, Faculty, Medical, Schools, Medical, Salaries and Fringe Benefits, Female, Male, Clinical Sciences, Opthalmology and Optometry, Public Health and Health Services
Abstract

This study investigates whether sex pay differences exist among clinical department chairs from 29 state medical schools in 12 states.

Published
2020

52. Assessment of Paid Childbearing and Family Leave Policies for Administrative Staff at Top US Medical Schools

Author

Vance, Mary C, Riano, Nicholas S, Jagsi, Reshma, Guzman, Marlene J, Beeler, Whitney, Linos, Eleni, and Mangurian, Christina

Subjects
Quality Education, Administrative Personnel, Adult, Family Leave, Fathers, Female, Humans, Male, Mothers, Organizational Policy, Parental Leave, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, Salaries and Fringe Benefits, Schools, Medical, United States, Clinical Sciences, Opthalmology and Optometry, Public Health and Health Services
Abstract

This quality improvement study reviews the human resources policies for childbearing and family leave for administrative staff at 12 leading US medical schools.

Published
2020

53. Perceptions of Pressures to Alter or Misrepresent Time Allocation Among Clinician-Researchers With NIH Career Development Awards.

Author

Jagsi, Reshma, Moniz, Michelle, Griffith, Kent, Jones, Rochelle, and Mangurian, Christina

Subjects
Adult, Awards and Prizes, Female, Humans, Logistic Models, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Multivariate Analysis, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Perception, Research Personnel, Sexism, Stress, Psychological, United States
Abstract

PURPOSE: National Institutes of Health career development (K) awards mandate specific allocations of effort to research and training. The authors sought to understand pressures perceived by award recipients to change or misrepresent effort, and whether these perceptions differed by gender. METHOD: In 2010-2011 and 2014, the authors surveyed K08 and K23 award recipients. Questions evaluated perceived pressure to change or misrepresent time allocation. Multivariable logistic regression modeling of pressure to misrepresent effort evaluated associations with individual and basic job characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 1,719 faculty in the initial target population, 493 women and 573 men (1,066, 62%) responded at both time points. Most respondents reported feeling pressure to increase time spent on professional activities other than their K award-related research or career development or to decrease time on their K award-related research. The likelihood of perceiving pressure differed significantly by gender: 68% of women vs 55% of men (P < .001). A minority reported perceiving pressure to misrepresent professional time (women, 29%, vs men, 27%, P = .52). Multivariable analysis revealed that pressure to misrepresent professional time was less likely among respondents at institutions with the most extramural funding (P = .02). A significant pairwise interaction between gender and K award type suggested that female K08 awardees had higher odds than male peers of perceiving pressure to misrepresent time. CONCLUSIONS: Most K award recipients reported feeling pressure to do more non-K award-related activities. More than a quarter reported feeling pressure to misrepresent effort. Additional research is needed to evaluate the proportion of academic medical faculty who actually misrepresent professional effort.

Published
2020

54. Perceptions of Pressures to Alter or Misrepresent Time Allocation Among Clinician-Researchers With NIH Career Development Awards.

Author

Moniz, Michelle H, Griffith, Kent A, Jones, Rochelle D, Mangurian, Christina, and Jagsi, Reshma

Subjects
Curriculum and Pedagogy, Health Services and Systems, Health Sciences, Education, Clinical Research, Gender Equality, Adult, Awards and Prizes, Female, Humans, Logistic Models, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Multivariate Analysis, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Perception, Research Personnel, Sexism, Stress, Psychological, United States, Clinical Sciences, General & Internal Medicine, Curriculum and pedagogy, Health services and systems
Abstract

PurposeNational Institutes of Health career development (K) awards mandate specific allocations of effort to research and training. The authors sought to understand pressures perceived by award recipients to change or misrepresent effort, and whether these perceptions differed by gender.MethodIn 2010-2011 and 2014, the authors surveyed K08 and K23 award recipients. Questions evaluated perceived pressure to change or misrepresent time allocation. Multivariable logistic regression modeling of pressure to misrepresent effort evaluated associations with individual and basic job characteristics.ResultsOf the 1,719 faculty in the initial target population, 493 women and 573 men (1,066, 62%) responded at both time points. Most respondents reported feeling pressure to increase time spent on professional activities other than their K award-related research or career development or to decrease time on their K award-related research. The likelihood of perceiving pressure differed significantly by gender: 68% of women vs 55% of men (P < .001). A minority reported perceiving pressure to misrepresent professional time (women, 29%, vs men, 27%, P = .52). Multivariable analysis revealed that pressure to misrepresent professional time was less likely among respondents at institutions with the most extramural funding (P = .02). A significant pairwise interaction between gender and K award type suggested that female K08 awardees had higher odds than male peers of perceiving pressure to misrepresent time.ConclusionsMost K award recipients reported feeling pressure to do more non-K award-related activities. More than a quarter reported feeling pressure to misrepresent effort. Additional research is needed to evaluate the proportion of academic medical faculty who actually misrepresent professional effort.

Published
2020

56. The Most Valuable Resource Is Time: Insights From a Novel National Program to Improve Retention of Physician-Scientists With Caregiving Responsibilities.

Author

Jones, Rochelle D, Miller, Jacquelyn, Vitous, C Ann, Krenz, Chris, Brady, Kathleen T, Brown, Ann J, Daumit, Gail L, Drake, Amelia F, Fraser, Victoria J, Hartmann, Katherine E, Hochman, Judith S, Girdler, Susan, Libby, Anne M, Mangurian, Christina, Regensteiner, Judith G, Yonkers, Kimberly, and Jagsi, Reshma

Subjects
Health Services and Systems, Health Sciences, Clinical Research, Adult, Biomedical Research, Career Choice, Education, Medical, Faculty, Medical, Female, Financing, Organized, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physicians, Program Development, Prospective Studies, Research Personnel, Clinical Sciences, Curriculum and Pedagogy, General & Internal Medicine, Curriculum and pedagogy, Health services and systems
Abstract

PurposeTo enhance understanding of challenges related to work-life integration in academic medicine and to inform the ongoing implementation of an existing program and the development of other interventions to promote success of physician-scientists.MethodThis study is part of a prospective analysis of the effects of the Fund to Retain Clinical Scientists (FRCS), a national program launched by the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation at 10 U.S. institutions, which provides financial support to physician-scientists facing caregiving challenges. In early 2018, 28 of 33 program awardees participated in semistructured interviews. Questions were about challenges faced by physician-scientists as caregivers and their early perceptions of the FRCS. Multiple analysts reviewed deidentified transcripts, iteratively revised the coding scheme, and interpreted the data using qualitative thematic analysis.ResultsParticipants' rich descriptions illuminated 5 interconnected themes: (1) Time is a critical and limited resource, (2) timing is key, (3) limited time resources and timing conflicts may have a particularly adverse effect on women's careers, (4) flexible funds enable reclamation and repurposing of time resources, and (5) FRCS leaders should be cognizant of time and timing conflicts when developing program-related offerings.ConclusionsPrograms such as the FRCS are instrumental in supporting individuals to delegate time-consuming tasks and to control how they spend their valuable time. Qualitative analysis suggests that access to and command of valuable time resources are crucial to career advancement, research productivity, and work-life flexibility, especially during critical time points along the physician-scientist trajectory.

Published
2019

58. Cannabis Use in Patients Seen in an Academic Radiation Oncology Department

Author

Cousins, Matthew M., Mayo, Chuck, Devasia, Theresa, Dykstra, Michael, Regan, Samuel, Miller, Sean, Allen, Steven G., Bryant, Alex K., Morales-Rivera, Krystal, Herr, Daniel J., Edwards, Donna M., Takayesu, Jamie, Birer, Samuel, Egerer, Nancy, Evans, Joseph, Elliott, David, Henderson, Caitlin, Laucis, Anna M., McFarlane, Matthew, Dragovic, Aleksandar F., Shah, Jennifer, Hayman, James A., Coughlin, Lara N., Ilgen, Mark, and Jagsi, Reshma

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

60. Burnout Among Mid-Career Academic Medical Faculty

Author

Paradis, Kelly C., primary, Kerr, Eve A., additional, Griffith, Kent A., additional, Cutter, Christina M., additional, Feldman, Eva L., additional, Singer, Kanakadurga, additional, Spector, Nancy D., additional, Ubel, Peter A., additional, and Jagsi, Reshma, additional

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

61. NRG-BR007: A phase III trial evaluating de-escalation of breast radiation (DEBRA) following breast-conserving surgery of stage 1, HR+, HER2-, RS ≤18 breast cancer.

Author

White, Julia R., primary, Cecchini, Reena S., additional, Harris, Eleanor Elizabeth, additional, Mamounas, Eleftherios P., additional, Stover, Daniel G., additional, Ganz, Patricia A., additional, Jagsi, Reshma, additional, Anderson, Stewart J., additional, Bergom, Carmen, additional, Théberge, Valérie, additional, El-Tamer, Mahmoud, additional, Zellars, Richard C., additional, Shumway, Dean, additional, Chen, Guang-Pei, additional, Julian, Thomas B., additional, and Wolmark, Norman, additional

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

62. A phase III randomized trial of radiotherapy optimization for low-risk HER2-positive breast cancer (HERO): NRG-BR008.

Author

Braunstein, Lior Zvi, primary, Mitchell, Melissa, additional, Bandos, Hanna, additional, Sikov, William M., additional, Khan, Atif J., additional, Chen, Peter Y., additional, Ganz, Patricia A., additional, Jagsi, Reshma, additional, White, Julia R., additional, Cecchini, Reena S., additional, Kang, Hyejoo, additional, Puhalla, Shannon L., additional, Bolton, Kelly L., additional, Connolly, Eileen, additional, Stringer-Reasor, Erica Michelle, additional, Gergelis, Kimberly, additional, Julian, Thomas B., additional, Mamounas, Eleftherios P., additional, and Wolmark, Norman, additional

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

64. Professional Experiences and Career Trajectories of Mid- to Senior-Career Women Clinician-Scientists

Author

Szczygiel, Lauren A., primary, Greene, Amanda K., additional, Cutter, Christina M., additional, Jones, Rochelle D., additional, Feldman, Eva L., additional, Paradis, Kelly C., additional, Settles, Isis H., additional, Singer, Kanakadurga, additional, Spector, Nancy D., additional, Stewart, Abigail J., additional, Ubel, Peter A., additional, and Jagsi, Reshma, additional

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

65. The Lancet Breast Cancer Commission

Author

Coles, Charlotte E, primary, Earl, Helena, additional, Anderson, Benjamin O, additional, Barrios, Carlos H, additional, Bienz, Maya, additional, Bliss, Judith M, additional, Cameron, David A, additional, Cardoso, Fatima, additional, Cui, Wanda, additional, Francis, Prudence A, additional, Jagsi, Reshma, additional, Knaul, Felicia Marie, additional, McIntosh, Stuart A, additional, Phillips, Kelly-Anne, additional, Radbruch, Lukas, additional, Thompson, Mareike K, additional, André, Fabrice, additional, Abraham, Jean E, additional, Bhattacharya, Indrani S, additional, Franzoi, Maria Alice, additional, Drewett, Lynsey, additional, Fulton, Alexander, additional, Kazmi, Farasat, additional, Inbah Rajah, Dharrnesha, additional, Mutebi, Miriam, additional, Ng, Dianna, additional, Ng, Szeyi, additional, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I, additional, Rosa, William E, additional, Rubasingham, Jeffrey, additional, Spence, Dingle, additional, Stobart, Hilary, additional, Vargas Enciso, Valentina, additional, Vaz-Luis, Ines, additional, Villarreal-Garza, Cynthia, additional, Arreola-Ornelas, Hector, additional, Bhadelia, Afsan, additional, Boughey, Judy C, additional, Chatterjee, Sanjoy, additional, Dodwell, David, additional, Doubova, Svetlana, additional, Du Plooy, Dorothy, additional, Essue, Beverley, additional, Goel, Neha, additional, Gralow, Julie, additional, Hawley, Sarah, additional, Kiely, Belinda, additional, Mann, Ritse, additional, Mertz, Shirley, additional, Palmieri, Carlo, additional, Poortmans, Philip, additional, Spanic, Tanja, additional, Stephen, Lesley, additional, Symmans, Fraser, additional, Towns, Catherine, additional, Verhoeven, Didier, additional, Vinnicombe, Sarah, additional, Watkins, David, additional, Yip, Cheng-Har, additional, and Zikmund-Fisher, Brian, additional

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

68. Behavioral Health and Burnout Among Physician Mothers Who Care for a Person With a Serious Health Problem, Long-term Illness, or Disability

Author

Yank, Veronica, Rennels, Carolyn, Linos, Eleni, Choo, Esther K, Jagsi, Reshma, and Mangurian, Christina

Subjects
Clinical Research, Behavioral and Social Science, Good Health and Well Being, Adult, Behavior, Burnout, Professional, Disability Evaluation, Disabled Persons, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Incidence, Job Satisfaction, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Mothers, Personal Satisfaction, Physicians, Retrospective Studies, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, United States, Clinical Sciences, Opthalmology and Optometry, Public Health and Health Services
Abstract

This survey study evaluates behavioral health risks and burnout among physician mothers who have caregiving responsibilities for persons in addition to their patients and children.

Published
2019

69. Childbearing and Family Leave Policies for Resident Physicians at Top Training Institutions.

Author

Magudia, Kirti, Bick, Alexander, Cohen, Jeffrey, Ng, Thomas SC, Weinstein, Debra, Mangurian, Christina, and Jagsi, Reshma

Subjects
Education, Medical, Graduate, Humans, Parental Leave, United States, Medical and Health Sciences, General & Internal Medicine
Abstract

This study describes childbearing and family leave at 15 graduate medical education (GME)–sponsoring institutions affiliated with 12 US medical schools on top 10 lists for funding or ranking.

Published
2018

70. Evaluation of Dose Accuracy in the Near-Surface Region for Whole Breast Irradiation Techniques in a Multi-institutional Consortium

Author

Moncion, Alexander, Wilson, Melissa, Ma, Ruimei, Marsh, Robin, Burmeister, Jay, Dryden, Daniel, Lack, Danielle, Grubb, Margaret, Mayville, Alan, Jursinic, Paul, Dess, Kathryn, Kamp, Justin, Young, Kellen, Dilworth, Joshua T., Kestin, Larry, Jagsi, Reshma, Mietzel, Melissa, Vicini, Frank, Pierce, Lori J., and Moran, Jean M.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

76. Association Between Physician- and Patient-Reported Symptoms in Patients Treated With Definitive Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer in a Statewide Consortium

Author

Wilkie, Joel R., Hochstedler, Kimberly A., Schipper, Matthew J., Matuszak, Martha M., Paximadis, Peter, Dominello, Michael M., Grills, Inga, Hayman, James A., Dess, Robert, Dragovic, Aleksandar F., Jagsi, Reshma, Pierce, Lori J., Spratt, Daniel E., Bergsma, Derek, Boike, Thomas P., Movsas, Benjamin, and Jolly, Shruti

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

77. Disease Control After Hypofractionation Versus Conventional Fractionation for Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Comparative Effectiveness in a Large Observational Cohort

Author

Jagsi, Reshma, Griffith, Kent A., Vicini, Frank A., Abu-Isa, Eyad, Bergsma, Derek, Bhatt, Amit, Dilworth, Joshua T., Dominello, Michael, Franklin, Stephen, Heimburger, David K., Kaufman, Isaac, Kocheril, Paul G., Kretzler, Annette E., Paximadis, Peter, Radawski, Jeffrey D., Walker, Eleanor M., and Pierce, Lori

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

78. Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of 3D-Conformal Radiation Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) in a Prospective Multicenter Cohort of Patients With Breast Cancer

Author

Jagsi, Reshma, Griffith, Kent A., Moran, Jean M., Matuszak, Martha M., Marsh, Robin, Grubb, Margaret, Abu-Isa, Eyad, Dilworth, Joshua T., Dominello, Michael M., Heimburger, David, Lack, Danielle, Walker, Eleanor M., Hayman, James A., Vicini, Frank, and Pierce, Lori J.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

79. Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in premenopausal women with oestrogen receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer treated with ovarian suppression: a patient-level meta-analysis of 7030 women from four randomised trials

Author

Bradley, Rosie, Braybrooke, Jeremy, Gray, Richard, Hills, Robert K, Liu, Zulian, Pan, Hongchao, Peto, Richard, Dodwell, David, McGale, Paul, Taylor, Carolyn, Francis, Prudence A, Gnant, Michael, Perrone, Francesco, Regan, Meredith M, Berry, Richard, Boddington, Clare, Clarke, Mike, Davies, Christina, Davies, Lucy, Duane, Fran, Evans, Vaughan, Gay, Jo, Gettins, Lucy, Godwin, Jon, James, Sam, Liu, Hui, MacKinnon, Elizabeth, Mannu, Gurdeep, McHugh, Theresa, Morris, Philip, Read, Simon, Straiton, Ewan, Jakesz, Raimund, Fesl, Christian, Pagani, Olivia, Gelber, Richard, De Laurentiis, Michelino, De Placido, Sabino, Gallo, Ciro, Albain, Kathy, Anderson, Stewart, Arriagada, Rodrigo, Bartlett, John, Bergsten-Nordström, Elizabeth, Bliss, Judith, Brain, Etienne, Carey, Lisa, Coleman, Robert, Cuzick, Jack, Davidson, Nancy, Del Mastro, Lucia, Di Leo, Angelo, Dignam, James, Dowsett, Mitch, Ejlertsen, Bent, Goetz, Matthew, Goodwin, Pam, Halpin-Murphy, Pat, Hayes, Dan, Hill, Catherine, Jagsi, Reshma, Janni, Wolfgang, Loibl, Sibylle, Mamounas, Eleftherios P, Martín, Miguel, Mukai, Hirofumi, Nekljudova, Valentina, Norton, Larry, Ohashi, Yasuo, Pierce, Lori, Poortmans, Philip, Pritchard, Kathleen I, Raina, Vinod, Rea, Daniel, Robertson, John, Rutgers, Emiel, Spanic, Tanja, Sparano, Joseph, Steger, Guenther, Tang, Gong, Toi, Masakazu, Tutt, Andrew, Viale, Giuseppe, Wang, Xiang, Whelan, Tim, Wilcken, Nicholas, Wolmark, Norman, Cameron, David, Bergh, Jonas, and Swain, Sandra M

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

80. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Blood Biomarkers for Evaluation of Radiation-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Patients With Breast Cancer: Results of a Phase 2 Clinical Trial

Author

Speers, Corey, Murthy, Venkatesh L., Walker, Eleanor M., Glide-Hurst, Carri K., Marsh, Robin, Tang, Ming, Morris, Emily L., Schipper, Matthew J., Weinberg, Richard L., Gits, Hunter C., Hayman, James, Feng, Mary, Balter, James, Moran, Jean, Jagsi, Reshma, and Pierce, Lori J.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

82. How Individuals' Health and Wealth Are Associated with Their Donation Behavior and Motivations.

Author

Konrath, Sara, Handy, Femida, Wright, Scott, Griffith, Kent A., and Jagsi, Reshma

Subjects
INCOME, ALTRUISM, HEART diseases, NONPROFIT organizations, MOTIVATION (Psychology)
Abstract

In this article, we examine the differences in charitable donating behaviors among three groups: a nationally representative American sample (N = 513), individuals with an annual household income greater than $250,000 (N = 253), and individuals with significant illness (heart disease or cancer; N = 516). We then use a validated donor motivations scale to examine whether these groups' reasons for donating money to nonprofits differ. While the extant literature provides information on who is likely to give and under what contexts, it treats donors as a homogenous group, only differentiating them by certain demographic variables. The current study examines two different groups based on two fundamental attributes: wealth and health. We hypothesized that systematic differences in giving behavior and self-reported motivations exist across these groups compared to a nationally representative sample. Instead, we found that only high-income individuals differed in their giving behaviors and motivations. These results show that donor behavior and motivations may depend on their wealth. This research may help fundraisers and development professionals better understand how and why different prospects donate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

83. An Innovative Program to Support Gender Equity and Success in Academic Medicine: Early Experiences From the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation's Fund to Retain Clinical Scientists.

Author

Jagsi, Reshma, Jones, Rochelle D, Griffith, Kent A, Brady, Kathleen T, Brown, Ann J, Davis, Randal D, Drake, Amelia F, Ford, Daniel, Fraser, Victoria J, Hartmann, Katherine E, Hochman, Judith S, Girdler, Susan, Libby, Anne M, Mangurian, Christina, Regensteiner, Judith G, Yonkers, Kimberly, Escobar-Alvarez, Sindy, and Myers, Elizabeth R

Subjects
Biomedical Research, Female, Foundations, Humans, Male, Research Personnel, Research Support as Topic, Sexism, United States, Clinical Sciences, Public Health and Health Services
Published
2018

84. It Is Time for Zero Tolerance for Sexual Harassment in Academic Medicine

Author

Bates, Carol K, Jagsi, Reshma, Gordon, Lynn K, Travis, Elizabeth, Chatterjee, Archana, Gillis, Marin, Means, Olivia, Chaudron, Linda, Ganetzky, Rebecca, Gulati, Martha, Fivush, Barbara, Sharma, Poonam, Grover, Amelia, Lautenberger, Diana, and Flotte, Terence R

Subjects
Curriculum and Pedagogy, Health Services and Systems, Health Sciences, Education, Neurosciences, Gender Equality, Education, Medical, Faculty, Medical, Humans, Incidence, Internship and Residency, Medical Staff, Hospital, Organizational Culture, Organizational Policy, Sex Offenses, Sexual Harassment, Societies, Medical, Students, Medical, United States, Vulnerable Populations, Clinical Sciences, General & Internal Medicine, Curriculum and pedagogy, Health services and systems
Abstract

While more women are in leadership positions in academic medicine now than ever before in U.S. history, evidence from recent surveys of women and graduating medical students demonstrates that sexual harassment continues in academic health centers. Academic medicine's ability to change its culture is hampered by victims' fear of reporting episodes of harassment, which is largely due to fear of retaliation. In this Perspective, the authors describe efforts in scientific societies to address the issue of sexual harassment and to begin to establish safe environments at national meetings. The authors contend that each institution must work to make it safe for individuals to come forward, to provide training for victims and for bystanders, and to abolish "locker room" talk that is demeaning to women.

Published
2018

85. Challenges faced by women oncologists in Africa: a mixed methods study

Author

Mutebi, Miriam, primary, Aryeetey, Naa Adorkor, additional, Alemu, Haimanot Kasahun, additional, Carson, Laura, additional, Mohamed, Zainab, additional, Doleeb, Zainab, additional, Lasebikan, Nwamaka, additional, Dharsee, Nazima Jaffer, additional, Msadabwe, Susan, additional, Ramogola-Masire, Doreen, additional, Mwanzi, Sitna, additional, Warfa, Khadija, additional, Nwachukwu, Emmanuella, additional, Woldetsadik, Edom Seife, additional, Spencer, Hirondina Vaz Borges, additional, Chraiet, Nesrine, additional, Jalink, Matthew, additional, Jagsi, Reshma, additional, Lombe, Dorothy Chilambe, additional, Vanderpuye, Verna, additional, and Hammad, Nazik, additional

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

86. Can I Leave? Perspectives on Parental Leave and Parenthood in Medical Training Among Program Directors and Trainees in Oncologic Specialties

Author

Beltrán Ponce, Sara, primary, Jagsi, Reshma, additional, Florez, Narjust, additional, Thomas, Charles R., additional, Banerjee, Anjishnu, additional, Jasti, Shravya, additional, Bailey, Morgan M., additional, Lawton, Colleen A.F., additional, Johnstone, Candice, additional, Clarke, Callisia N., additional, Bedi, Meena, additional, Jovanovic, Mirjana, additional, and Saeed, Hina, additional

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

89. Breast Cancer

Author

Shumway, Dean A., Sabolch, Aaron, Jagsi, Reshma, Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich, Series Editor, Parizel, Paul M., Series Editor, Peh, Wilfred C. G., Series Editor, Brady, Luther W, Series Editor, Lu, Jiade J., Series Editor, Lo, Simon S., editor, Teh, Bin S., editor, Jiang, Guo-Liang, editor, and Mayr, Nina A., editor

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

91. Trastuzumab for early-stage, HER2-positive breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 13 864 women in seven randomised trials

Author

Bradley, Rosie, Braybrooke, Jeremy, Gray, Richard, Hills, Robert, Liu, Zulian, Peto, Richard, Davies, Lucy, Dodwell, David, McGale, Paul, Pan, Hongchao, Taylor, Carolyn, Anderson, Stewart, Gelber, Richard, Gianni, Luca, Jacot, William, Joensuu, Heikki, Moreno-Aspitia, Alvaro, Piccart, Martine, Press, Michael, Romond, Edward, Slamon, Dennis, Suman, Vera, Berry, Richard, Boddington, Clare, Clarke, Mike, Davies, Christina, Duane, Fran, Evans, Vaughan, Gay, Jo, Gettins, Lucy, Godwin, Jon, James, Sam, Liu, Hui, MacKinnon, Elizabeth, Mannu, Gurdeep, McHugh, Theresa, Morris, Philip, Read, Simon, Straiton, Ewan, Wang, Yaochen, Crown, John, de Azambuja, Evandro, Delaloge, Suzette, Fung, Helena, Geyer, Charles, Spielmann, Marc, Valagussa, Pinuccia, Albain, Kathy, Arriagada, Rodrigo, Bartlett, John, Bergsten-Nordström, Elizabeth, Bliss, Judith, Brain, Etienne, Carey, Lisa, Coleman, Robert, Cuzick, Jack, Davidson, Nancy, Del Mastro, Lucia, Di Leo, Angelo, Dignam, James, Dowsett, Mitch, Ejlertsen, Bent, Francis, Prue, Gnant, Michael, Goetz, Matthew, Goodwin, Pam, Halpin-Murphy, Pat, Hayes, Dan, Hill, Catherine, Jagsi, Reshma, Janni, Wolfgang, Loibl, Sibylle, Mamounas, Eleftherios P, Martín, Miguel, Mukai, Hirofumi, Nekljudova, Valentina, Norton, Larry, Ohashi, Yasuo, Pierce, Lori, Poortmans, Philip, Raina, Vinod, Rea, Daniel, Regan, Meredith, Robertson, John, Rutgers, Emiel, Spanic, Tanja, Sparano, Joseph, Steger, Guenther, Tang, Gong, Toi, Masakazu, Tutt, Andrew, Viale, Giuseppe, Wang, Xiang, Whelan, Tim, Wilcken, Nicholas, Wolmark, Norman, Cameron, David, Bergh, Jonas, Pritchard, Kathleen I, and Swain, Sandra M

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

92. The use of bolus in postmastectomy radiation therapy for breast cancer: A systematic review

Author

Dahn, Hannah M., Boersma, Liesbeth J., de Ruysscher, Dirk, Meattini, Icro, Offersen, Birgitte V., Pignol, Jean-Philippe, Aristei, Cynthia, Belkacemi, Yazid, Benjamin, Dori, Bese, Nuran, Coles, Charlotte E., Franco, Pierfrancesco, Ho, Alice, Hol, Sandra, Jagsi, Reshma, Kirby, Anna M., Marrazzo, Livia, Marta, Gustavo N., Moran, Meena S., Nichol, Alan M., Nissen, Henrik D., Strnad, Vratislav, Zissiadis, Yvonne E., Poortmans, Philip, and Kaidar-Person, Orit

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

96. Promoting the Appropriate Use of Advanced Radiation Technologies in Oncology: Summary of a National Cancer Policy Forum Workshop.

Author

Smith, Grace L, Ganz, Patricia A, Bekelman, Justin E, Chmura, Steven J, Dignam, James J, Efstathiou, Jason A, Jagsi, Reshma, Johnstone, Peter A, Steinberg, Michael L, Williams, Stephen B, Yu, James B, Zietman, Anthony L, Weichselbaum, Ralph R, and Tina Shih, Ya-Chen

Subjects
Humans, Neoplasms, Radiotherapy, Program Evaluation, Technology, Radiologic, Decision Making, Radiation Oncology, Diffusion of Innovation, Research Personnel, Costs and Cost Analysis, United States, Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated, Proton Therapy, National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division, Cancer, Comparative Effectiveness Research, Quality Education, Other Physical Sciences, Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract

PurposeLeaders in the oncology community are sounding a clarion call to promote "value" in cancer care decisions. Value in cancer care considers the clinical effectiveness, along with the costs, when selecting a treatment. To discuss possible solutions to the current obstacles to achieving value in the use of advanced technologies in oncology, the National Cancer Policy Forum of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine held a workshop, "Appropriate Use of Advanced Technologies for Radiation Therapy and Surgery in Oncology" in July 2015. The present report summarizes the discussions related to radiation oncology.Methods and materialsThe workshop convened stakeholders, including oncologists, researchers, payers, policymakers, and patients. Speakers presented on key themes, including the rationale for a value discussion on advanced technology use in radiation oncology, the generation of scientific evidence for value of advanced radiation technologies, the effect of both scientific evidence and "marketplace" (or economic) factors on the adoption of technologies, and newer approaches to improving value in the practice of radiation oncology. The presentations were followed by a panel discussion with dialogue among the stakeholders.ResultsChallenges to generating evidence for the value of advanced technologies include obtaining contemporary, prospective, randomized, and representative comparative effectiveness data. Proposed solutions include the use of prospective registry data; integrating radiation oncology treatment, outcomes, and quality benchmark data; and encouraging insurance coverage with evidence development. Challenges to improving value in practice include the slow adoption of higher value and the de-adoption of lower value treatments. The proposed solutions focused on engaging stakeholders in iterative, collaborative, and evidence-based efforts to define value and promote change in radiation oncology practice. Recent examples of ongoing or successful responses to the discussed challenges were provided.ConclusionsDiscussions of "value" have increased as a priority in the radiation oncology community. Practitioners in the radiation oncology community can play a critical role in promoting a value-oriented framework to approach radiation oncology treatment.

Published
2017

97. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Fund to Retain Clinical Scientists: innovating support for early-career family caregivers

Author

Jagsi, Reshma, Beeland, T. DeLene, Sia, Kevin, Szczygiel, Lauren A., Allen, Matthew R., Arora, Vineet M., Bair-Merritt, Megan, Bauman, Melissa D., Bogner, Hillary R., Daumit, Gail, Davis, Esa, Fagerlin, Angela, Ford, Daniel E., Gbadegesin, Rasheed, Griendling, Kathy, Hartmann, Katherine, Hedayati, S. Susan, Jackson, Rebecca D., Matulevicius, Susan, Mugavero, Michael J., Nehl, Eric J., Neogi, Tuhina, Regensteiner, Judith G., Rubin, Michael A., Rubio, Doris, Singer, Kanakadurga, Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker, Volerman, Anna, Laney, Sandra, Patton, Carrie, and Alvarez, Sindy Escobar

Subjects
Medical scientists -- Finance -- Social aspects, Caregivers -- Social aspects -- Finance, Company financing, Health care industry, Doris Duke Charitable Foundation -- Donations
Abstract

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted and amplified family caregiving obligations for many clinical investigators and other biomedical researchers. Unpredictable access to daycare, schools, assisted living facilities, informal networks, and [...]

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results