Search

Purpose The randomized, multicenter, phase III protocol C-07 compared the efficacy of adjuvant bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin (FULV) versus FULV with oxaliplatin (FLOX) in stage II or III colon cancer. Definitive analysis revealed an increase in 4-year disease-free survival from 67.0% to 73.2% in favor of FLOX. This study compares neurotoxicity between the treatments. Patients and Methods Neurotoxicity was recorded for all patients using standard adverse event reporting. Patients at select institutions completed a neurotoxicity questionnaire through 18 months of follow-up. Results A total of 2,492 patients enrolled onto C-07 and 400 patients enrolled onto the patient-reported substudy. Mean patient-reported neurotoxicity was higher with oxaliplatin throughout the 18 months of study (P < .0001). During therapy, patients receiving oxaliplatin experienced significantly more hand/foot toxicity (eg, “quite a bit” of cold-induced hand/foot pain 26% FLOX v 2.6% FULV) and overall weakness (eg, moderate weakness in 27.4% FLOX v 16.2% FULV). At 18 months, hand neuropathy had diminished, but patients who received oxaliplatin experienced continued foot discomfort (eg, moderate foot numbness and tingling for 22.1% FLOX v 4.6% FULV). Observer-reported neurotoxicity was low grade and primarily neurosensory rather than neuromotor. Sixty-eight percent in the FLOX group v 8% in the FULV group had neurotoxicity at their first on-treatment assessment. Time to resolution was significantly longer for those receiving oxaliplatin, and continued beyond 2 years for more than 10% in the oxaliplatin group. Conclusion Oxaliplatin causes significant neurotoxicity. It is experienced primarily in the hands during therapy and in the feet during follow-up. In a minority of patients the neurotoxicity is long lasting.

This phase II study (S9914) evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of the three-drug combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and topotecan with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in previously untreated patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer.Patients with newly diagnosed extensive stage small cell lung cancer received topotecan 1.0 mg/m intravenously on days 1 through 4; paclitaxel 175 mg/m intravenously on day 4, and carboplatin AUC = 5 intravenously on day 4, treatments were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles. All patients also received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 5 mug/kg/day beginning on day 5 of each cycle.A total of 88 patients were enrolled on the study; 79 patients were assessable for survival and toxicity and 74 patients for response. Objective response was observed in 50 patients (68%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 56%-78%) with nine patients (12%) achieving a complete response. Median progression-free survival was 7 months (95% CI: 6-8 months) and median overall survival was 12 months (95% CI: 11-14 months). The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 48% (95% CI: 37%-59%) and 20% (95% CI: 11%-29%), respectively. The most common toxicities were hematologic. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was noted in 17 (22%) and 27 (34%) patients, respectively. Febrile neutropenia developed in only four patients. Two patients (3%) died of treatment-related causes.The combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and topotecan combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support is an active and reasonably well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

We hypothesized that thalidomide would improve the response and toxicity profile of chemotherapy with carboplatin and irinotecan.The key eligibility criteria were stage IIIB (malignant pleural effusion) and IV non-small cell lung cancer, measurable disease, no prior chemotherapy, prior radiation only for brain metastasis, performance status 0 or 1, and adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function. Treatment consisted of carboplatin at a calculated area under the curve of 5 and infused intravenously for 30 min on day 1 and irinotecan (50 mg/m2 intravenously for 90 min on days 1 and 8 every 21 days). Thalidomide was given orally every evening starting on day 1 until progressive disease; the starting dose was 200 mg per day, which was escalated by 100 mg per week if tolerated (maximum 1000 mg per day). The objectives were to determine the response rate, time to progression, overall survival, and toxicity profile.In all, 46 patients were enrolled, but three who never received protocol treatment were excluded from the analysis. The characteristics of the 43 eligible and treated patients included median age 63 (47-79), female/male 13/30, black/white 3/40, PS 0/1 in 10/33, and stage 3/4 in 6/37. The objective response rates were complete response 1 (2%), partial response 5 (12%), stable disease 24 (56%), progressive disease 9 (21%), and unevaluable for response 4 (9%). The median time to progression was 3.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5-4.9). The median survival time was 8.1 months (95% CI, 5.0-12.9). Frequent toxicities were neutropenia, fatigue/malaise, and nausea/vomiting. Diarrhea was uncommon and mild.This treatment regimen of carboplatin, irinotecan, and thalidomide was tolerable, with reversible neutropenia as the major toxicity and only minor diarrhea. The overall response rate did not meet our predetermined level of efficacy to merit further investigation.

To integrate the patient perspective into adverse event reporting, the National Cancer Institute developed a patient-reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).To assess the construct validity, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness of PRO-CTCAE items.A total of 975 adults with cancer undergoing outpatient chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy enrolled in this questionnaire-based study between January 2011 and February 2012. Eligible participants could read English and had no clinically significant cognitive impairment. They completed PRO-CTCAE items on tablet computers in clinic waiting rooms at 9 US cancer centers and community oncology practices at 2 visits 1 to 6 weeks apart. A subset completed PRO-CTCAE items during an additional visit 1 business day after the first visit.Primary comparators were clinician-reported Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30).A total of 940 of 975 (96.4%) and 852 of 940 (90.6%) participants completed PRO-CTCAE items at visits 1 and 2, respectively. At least 1 symptom was reported by 938 of 940 (99.8%) participants. Participants' median age was 59 years; 57.3% were female, 32.4% had a high school education or less, and 17.1% had an ECOG PS of 2 to 4. All PRO-CTCAE items had at least 1 correlation in the expected direction with a QLQ-C30 scale (111 of 124, P.05 for all). Stronger correlations were seen between PRO-CTCAE items and conceptually related QLQ-C30 domains. Scores for 94 of 124 PRO-CTCAE items were higher in the ECOG PS 2 to 4 vs 0 to 1 group (58 of 124, P.05 for all). Overall, 119 of 124 items met at least 1 construct validity criterion. Test-retest reliability was 0.7 or greater for 36 of 49 prespecified items (median [range] intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.76 [0.53-.96]). Correlations between PRO-CTCAE item changes and corresponding QLQ-C30 scale changes were statistically significant for 27 prespecified items (median [range] r=0.43 [0.10-.56]; all P≤.006).Evidence demonstrates favorable validity, reliability, and responsiveness of PRO-CTCAE in a large, heterogeneous US sample of patients undergoing cancer treatment. Studies evaluating other measurement properties of PRO-CTCAE are under way to inform further development of PRO-CTCAE and its inclusion in cancer trials.

BACKGROUND: Tumor response and treatment-related toxicities vary greatly among patients despite careful selection criteria and accurate drug dosing. This projects was to evaluate risk and validate prediction models for vascular toxicity in patients with newly diagnosed GBM treated with bevacizumab. METHODS: We tabulated the incidence of cardiac and vascular toxicity in RTOG0525 (standard vs. dose-dense temozolomide) and RTOG0825 (bevacizumab (BEV) vs placebo). Based on the data collected from RTOG0825 BEV containing arm, a risk prediction model for hypertension (Grade 2-4) and thrombosis (Grade 3-4) was built based on known risk factors. Candidate risk factors were screened using univariable logistic regression (significance 0.15), then included in a multivariable model (significance 0.05) to determine the final risk model. RESULTS: In RTOG0825, overall incidence of hypertension was 11% (67/591) and thrombosis (73/591) 12%. Hypertension was higher with BEV (15 vs 8%) and no difference found for thrombosis (12 vs 13%). Men experienced more toxicity than women (12 vs 10% hypertension; 14 vs 9% thrombosis) but this was not significant at 0.05. None of the known risk factors for hypertension and thrombosis with BEV were significant in the final risk prediction model. For comparison, in RTOG0525, the incidence of cardiac toxicity was 4% (27/720) and thrombosis was 6%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients enrolled on these clinical trials had a lower overall incidence of both adverse events than would be expected in this demographic (middle aged or older with underlying glioblastoma where the incidence of hypertension is 30% and thromboembolism of 15%). Previously described risk factors were not confirmed, but may reflect selection by eligibility criteria of a healthier patient cohort compared with a population-based cohort. While clinical risk factors were unrevealing, planned genomic phenotyping focusing on polymorphisms may elucidate informative risk profiles. Supported by NCI grants U10CA21661, U10CA180868, U10CA180822, U10CA37422, U24CA114734, NIH grant 1R01NR013707, and Genentech.

Importance Observational studies suggest a role for dietary nutrients such as vitamin E and selenium in cataract prevention. However, the results of randomized clinical trials of vitamin E supplements and cataract have been disappointing and are not yet available for selenium. Objective To test whether long-term supplementation with selenium and vitamin E affects the incidence of cataract in a large cohort of men. Design, Setting, and Participants The Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) Eye Endpoints Study was an ancillary study of the Southwest Oncology Group–coordinated SELECT, a randomized placebo-controlled 4-arm trial of selenium and vitamin E conducted among 35 533 men, 50 years and older for African American participants and 55 years and older for all other men, at 427 participating sites in the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico. A total of 11 267 SELECT participants from 128 SELECT sites participated in the SELECT Eye Endpoints ancillary study. Interventions Individual supplements of selenium (200 μg per day from L-selenomethionine) and vitamin E (400 IU per day of all rac-α-tocopheryl acetate). Main Outcomes and Measures Incident cataract was defined as a lens opacity, age related in origin, and responsible for a reduction in best-corrected visual acuity to 20/30 or worse based on self-reports confirmed by medical record review. Cataract extraction was defined as the surgical removal of an incident cataract. Results During a mean (SD) of 5.6 (1.2) years of treatment and follow-up, 389 cases of cataract were documented. There were 185 cataracts in the selenium group and 204 in the no selenium group (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95 % CI, 0.75-1.11; P = .37). For vitamin E, there were 197 cases in the treated group and 192 in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95 % CI, 0.84-1.25; P = .81). Similar results were observed for cataract extraction. Conclusions and Relevance These data from a large cohort of apparently healthy men indicate that long-term daily supplementation with selenium and/or vitamin E is unlikely to have a large beneficial effect on age-related cataract. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT00784225

Some critics question whether research on complementary and alternative modalities for patients with cancer can be done efficiently in traditional clinical settings. This article reviews a program of complementary medicine research that has been done in a traditional clinical setting over the past 30 years. Trials using complementary therapies for both symptom management and cancer treatment done by the Mayo Clinic and the North Central Cancer Treatment Group are reviewed. Twenty-seven studies have been developed using complementary therapies, addressing such issues as mucosal and epidermal toxicity, hot flashes, lymphedema, anorexia and cachexia, insomnia, cognitive dysfunction, fatigue, and cancer treatment. Nineteen of them have been completed and have had results published in peer-reviewed clinical journals, whereas two manuscripts are in press. Two other trials have recently completed accrual, and the data are being analyzed so that manuscripts can be prepared. In addition, four clinical trials are actively accruing patients. The data presented in this article demonstrate that complementary and alternative medicine research can be done in a scientifically sound manner. Well-designed and adequately powered studies can be implemented, and large numbers of patients can be accrued. The resulting research evaluations can be published in peer-reviewed medical journals.

Background Building on results from Southwest Oncology Group trial 8905, this trial was designed to compare low-dose continuous infusion (LDCI) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) versus intermittent high-dose infusion (HDI) of 5-FU in disseminated colorectal cancer (CRC) for evidence of survival advantage based on dose intensity. A companion trial was funded to assess molecular parameters associated with fluoropyrimidine response or resistance and toxicity from these treatments. Patients and Methods Eligibility included histologic diagnosis of disseminated CRC, measurable or evaluable disease, no previous therapy for metastatic disease, performance status of 0–2, and adequate renal, hepatic, cardiac, and hematologic function. Stratification factors were measurable versus evaluable disease, performance status of 0/1 versus 2, presence versus absence of adjuvant therapy, and presence versus absence of previous surgery and enrollment on the companion trial. Patients were randomized to receive (1) LDCI 5-FU 300 mg/m2 per day for 28 days every 5 weeks or (2) HDI 5-FU 2600 mg/m2 for 24 hours each week. Results Between April 1995 and May 1999, 730 patients were accrued (LDCI arm, n = 360; HDI arm, n = 370). Of these, 708 eligible patients were assessable for survival and 690 for toxicity. Median survival for both groups was 13 months. Toxicity was mild; 4 events. There were 8 study-related deaths (1%). Less than 10% of patients were enrolled in the companion trial. Conclusions Increasing 5-FU dose intensity yields no survival advantage beyond that achieved with LDCI 5-FU. This study confirms the favorable toxicity profile of infusional 5-FU. Because no preferential benefit was observed for either infusion schedule, the more convenient weekly schedule should be considered for 5-FU–based combination regimens for disseminated CRC.

The objective of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.Patients with metastatic or locally unresectable transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium who had received either no or one previous systemic chemotherapy regimen were eligible. All patients received chemotherapy with intravenous paclitaxel at a dose of 200 mg/m(2) on Day 1, intravenous carboplatin at an area under the serum concentration-time curve of 5.0 on Day 1, and intravenous gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8. Treatment courses were repeated every 21 days. Patients were evaluated for response after they completed two treatment courses; patients who achieved an objective response and stable disease continued treatment for a total of six courses or until tumor progression.Sixty patients were treated between January 2000 and September 2003. Thirty-five patients (58%) hador = 1 visceral sites of metastases, and only 4 patients (7%) had received any previous systemic chemotherapy. Twenty-six patients (43%) had achieved objective responses to treatment (12% complete responses). The median actuarial survival was 11 months, and the actuarial 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 46% and 27%, respectively. Myelosuppression was the most frequent toxicity, and Grade 3-4 neutropenia (using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [version 2.0]) occurred in 72% of patients (46% of courses). Ten patients were hospitalized for the treatment of neutropenia and fever, and 1 patient died of treatment-related causes. Nonhematologic toxicities were relatively uncommon.The combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine was an active and tolerable regimen for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. However, the regimen was more toxic and showed no obvious incremental increase in efficacy compared retrospectively with various two-drug regimens.

e17605 Background: The NCI Community Cancer Centers Program (NCCCP) pilot was launched in 2007 with aims to: improve quality, reduce disparities and increase clinical trial (CT) participation. Hosp...

6512 Background: ASCO described minimum standards and exemplary attributes for CT sites to improve research quality (Zon et al JCO 2008, JOP 2011; Baer et al JOP 2010). Based on these attributes, the NCI Community Cancer Centers Program (NCCCP) developed and piloted the CT AIM Tool to facilitate research program improvements through self-assessment and benchmarking. The tool identified 9 attributes (see Table) each with 3 progressive levels for research sites to “score” their program from less (Level 1) to more (Level 3) exemplary CT infrastructure (e.g. Level 1- only phase 3 treatment trials open vs. Level 3 – Phase 1/2/3, cancer control and prevention trials open). Methods: From 2011-13, 21 NCCCP sites self assessed their CT programs annually using the tool. Results: See Table. Conclusions: Statistically significant increases (p < 0.0001) occurred in Level 3 (more exemplary) infrastructure ratings from 2011 to 2013 across all 9 attribute categories assessed at the 21 sites. Statistically significant gai...

9507 Background: Impaired sexual satisfaction is a prevalent and distressing issue for female cancer survivors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of vaginal DHEA on vaginal atrophy s...

207 Background: Palmetto Hematology Oncology (PHO) is the medical oncology practice of Spartanburg Regional Healthcare System (SRHS) and has participated in QOPI since 2009 and earned QOPI certification in September 2011. Emotional well-being assessments and documentation of interventions were selected for a performance improvement project based on QOPI measures from Fall 2009. Methods: Several articles were identified supporting the use of the NCCN Distress Thermometer following a comprehensive literature search and approval was obtained for use. The NCCN Distress Thermometer was administered to all new patients through inclusion in “new patient” paperwork packets. Two physician offices within the practice were piloted with the physicians reviewing the patient reported assessments and documenting any required interventions. All completed NCCN Distress Thermometer forms were also reviewed by the medical social work team, and for scores > 3, interventions by phone or face-to-face were completed by them and documented in the patients’ electronic medical records. Results: Due to the success of the pilot efforts the assessment/intervention process for emotional well-being was expanded throughout the PHO practice, the Gibbs Infusion Center, and Radiation Oncology. The QOPI emotional well-being indicator revealed an increase from the Fall 2009 to Spring 2012 of 36.25% to 96.25%. Conversely, our compliance with intervention by the second office visit decreased from 94.44% to 69.44%, respectively. Conclusions: Although PHO’s scores for the emotional well-being assessment have dramatically improved with implementation of the process improvement initiative, opportunity remains for improving emotional well-being intervention documentation. This initiative highlighted the lack of psychiatric/psychological services available to PHO patients. References: NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Distress Management, Version 3.2012; Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/distress.pdf . QOPI The Quality Oncology Practice Initiative; Available at: http://qopi.asco.org/program .

130 Background: Palmetto Hematology Oncology (PHO) is the medical oncology practice of Spartanburg Regional Healthcare System (SRHS) and has participated in QOPI since 2009 and earned QOPI certification in September 2011. Our Fall 2010 QOPI Patient Consent for Chemotherapy score was 70.73%, lower than the QOPI aggregate score of 86.46%. Methods: A workgroup was convened to address chemotherapy consent documentation compliance. QOPI data revealed the need for a uniform, system-wide chemotherapy consent process. A chemotherapy consent form specifically for our cancer center was created following an extensive literature review and benchmarking with American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines, NCI Designated Cancer Centers, NCI Community Cancer Centers Program (NCCCP funded with federal funds from the NCI, Contract # HHSN261200800001E) resources, and other healthcare institutions. Our chemotherapy administration policy was revised to include a “hard stop” if a signed chemotherapy consent was not available prior to administration of chemotherapy in all areas of our institution. Results: Patient Consent for Chemotherapy QOPI scores revealed an increase from Fall 2010 to Spring 2012 of 70.73% to 100%. As a result of the workgroup’s efforts, it was approved by our Cancer Care Committee to develop a Chemotherapy Safety Committee (CSC) to standardize chemotherapy practices throughout our system. The CSC integrated key staff responsible for chemotherapy administration. The CSC was instrumental in reviewing and updating policies and procedures during our QOPI certification efforts. Conclusions: Our participation in QOPI provided data to support efforts for a system-wide chemotherapy consent revision and process implementation. The availability of ASCO, Oncology Nursing Society, and other key resources provided turn key processes for this performance improvement project. Practice scores for the Patient Consent for Chemotherapy have reached 100% compliance signifying our performance at a “best practice” level. References: QOPI The Quality Oncology Practice Initiative, available at: http://qopi.asco.org/program .

9047 Background: Symptomatic adverse events (AE) in cancer trials are reported by clinicians using the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). To integrate the patient perspective into AE reporting, NCI contracted (HHSN261201000043C) to create a patient-reported outcomes companion tool (PRO-CTCAE). We report the validity and reliability of PRO-CTCAE’s 124 items reflecting 78 symptomatic AEs. Methods: English-speaking subjects (n=869; 44% male; median [mdn] age 59; 32% racial/ethnic minority; 34% high school or less; 17% ECOG Performance Status [PS] 2-4) receiving treatment for a range of cancers at 4 NCI-designated cancer centers and 5 sites in NCI's Community Cancer Centers Program completed a web-based survey in clinic including PRO-CTCAE and EORTC QLQ-C30. Pearson correlations were computed between PRO-CTCAE items and QLQ-C30 scales. Differences in PRO-CTCAE item scores between clinician-reported ECOG PS (0-1 vs 2-4) groups were computed. Test-retest reliability of 48 prespecified items was evaluated in a subset (n=79). Results: Correlations in the expected direction were observed for 116/124 PRO-CTCAE items with the QLQ-C30 global health scale (mdn r=-.21; range .08 to -.57). Stronger correlations were seen for PRO-CTCAE items with conceptually related QLQ-C30 domains: fatigue with physical, role and social functioning (-.54 to -.66); anxiety and depression with emotional functioning (-.54 to -.70); and concentration and memory problems with cognitive functioning (-.62 to -.72) [all p

PURPOSE To determine in a prospective randomized trial whether high-dose orally administered medroxy-progesterone acetate (MPA) was superior to tamoxifen in patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer who had received no prior endocrine therapy in either the adjuvant or advanced setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients initially received either tamoxifen 20 mg/d orally or MPA 1 g/d orally. At the time of disease progression, patients were crossed over to the other regimen. Eligibility required patients to be age > or = 18 years, performance status 0 to 3, and estrogen receptor (ER)- or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive or unknown. RESULTS One hundred eighty-two eligible patients were entered and 166 were assessable for response. Complete plus partial response rates for tamoxifen and MPA were 17% and 34%, respectively (P = .01). Patients with bone metastases had a significantly higher partial response rate with MPA compared with tamoxifen (33% v 13%). Median time to treatment failure was 5.5 months for tamoxifen and 6.3 months for MPA (P = .48). The median survival duration was 24 months for tamoxifen and 33 months for MPA (P = .09). Multivariate analysis showed that treatment significantly influenced response rate, but not time to treatment failure or survival. After treatment failure following MPA, six of 42 patients (14%) treated with tamoxifen responded, compared with six of 49 (12%) treated with MPA following tamoxifen. Both agents were associated with minimal toxicity, but 35% of patients on MPA gained more than 20 lb as opposed to only 2% on tamoxifen. CONCLUSION In this trial, initial treatment with MPA of endocrine-naive metastatic breast cancer patients was associated with a significantly higher response rate but not with improvement in time to treatment failure or survival, when compared with initial treatment with tamoxifen. Further randomized trials in patients with bone metastases are warranted to determine if high-dose progestin therapy is superior to tamoxifen in these patients.

6110 Background: The NCCCP has engaged in special programs to enhance clinical trial accrual among underserved populations. These include cultural awareness webinars, nurse/lay navigators with tran...

e16539 Background: One of the goals of the NCCCP pilot is to disseminate the use of multidisciplinary case conferences/clinics (MDC) across community cancer centers. There are studies to show that ...

9139 Background: Hot flashes are a common, undesirable complication of androgen-deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer. A previous randomized trial indicated that gabapentin (900 mg/day) w...

9531 Background: Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a prevalent dose limiting toxicity for several important cancer treatment agents. CIPN can impair function and cause distress. There are no proven pharmacologic treatments for established CIPN currently. This double blind randomized placebo controlled trial evaluated a compounded topical gel for this problem. The novelty of this treatment is that it might incorporate several agents with different mechanisms of action to provide relief locally without negative systemic effects. Methods: Patients with CIPN (rated ≥4 out of 10) for at least one month, related to previous and/or concurrent exposure to neurotoxic agents, were randomized to baclofen 10 mg, amitriptyline HCL 40 mg and ketamine 20 mg in a pluronic lecithin organogel (BAK-PLO) vs placebo (PLO) to determine its effect on numbness, tingling, pain, and motor function. Exclusion criteria included other causes and/or current treatment for peripheral neuropathy. The primary endpoint was the baseline adjusted sensory subscale of the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20, at 4 weeks. Results: Between February and May 2008, 208 patients were enrolled onto this trial. Four week data are shown in the table below, higher numbers being better. The percentage of patients that had improvements of at least 10, on a 100 point scale, in the motor subscale was statistically significantly higher in the BAK-PLO arm, p=.04. There were no unwanted toxicities associated with the BAK-PLO that were significantly different from placebo and no evidence of CNS or systemic toxicity. Conclusions: Topical treatment with BAK-PLO appears to moderately improve symptoms of CIPN. This topical gel was well tolerated without systemic side effects. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

8507 Background: Problems with sexual functioning are an issue negatively affecting the quality of life of female cancer survivors. Testosterone has been implicated as an important hormone in sexual functioning such as libido. Studies of transdermal testosterone have shown benefit in enhancing libido in women who have been diagnosed with hypoactive sexual desire disorder after bilateral oophorectomy. This phase III placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluated whether transdermal testosterone would increase libido in female cancer survivors. Methods: Women with a history of cancer, currently without evidence of disease, were eligible if they reported a decrease in sexual desire and had a sexual partner. Women must have been postmenopausal. Eligible women were randomized to receive 2% testosterone in Vanicream (10 mg daily) versus placebo Vanicream for four weeks, then crossed over to the opposite treatment. The primary endpoint, libido, was measured via the desire subscales of the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ), which were completed at baseline and at the end of 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. The primary endpoint was the average intra-patient change from baseline to four weeks in the CSFQ subscales between the two arms. A total of 64 patients per group were needed to provide 80% power to detect a difference of 8 units between the treatment means. Two-sided alternative hypothesis testing and a 5% Type I error rate were used. Results: One hundred fifty women were enrolled onto this study. Complete data were available for 132 women. For those on active testosterone cream, serum bioavailable testosterone levels increased significantly over placebo, with a mean change from baseline of 12 and 10 ng/dl for the first and second period, respectively (p No significant financial relationships to disclose.

4028 Background: The role of preoperative chemoradiation in patients (pts) with localized esophageal cancer remains unclear. Most preoperative regimens produce 20–30% pathologic complete response (pCR) rates, which predicts improved survival. Our community-based multicenter group performed sequential trials evaluating a novel paclitaxel-containing preoperative chemoradiation regimen, now with median followup > 6 years. Methods: Eligibility: untreated adenocarcinoma or squamous carcinoma of esophagus or GE junction; clinical stage I-III; surgical candidate; ECOG PS 0–2, adequate organ function; informed consent. Pts received paclitaxel 200mg/m2 IV and carboplatin AUC 6.0 IV, days 1, 22; 5FU 225mg/m2, 24 hr continuous infusion, days 1–42; RT 45 Gy in 1.8 Gy/d single daily fractions. Surgical resection was performed 6–10 weeks after completion. Results: 226 pts with the following characterstics were treated: median age 58 years; adenocarcinoma 74%; distal/GE junction 79%; clinical stage II/III 84%. 220 pts (97%) completed preoperative therapy, and 199 pts (88%) had resection. Responses in resected pts: pCR 45% (39% of entire group), PR (microscopic residual) 29%, PR (macroscopic) 15%. After median followup of 75 months, median PFS and overall survival for the entire group were 19 and 26 months, respectively; 3- and 5-year survivals were 40% and 33%, respectively. Median survival was better in pts with pCR vs others (33 vs 21 mo; p=.026). 3-yr survival comparisons of other potential prognostic factors: adeno vs squamous, 43% vs 42%; clinical stage I vs II/III, 63% vs 36% (p=.001); distal location vs others, 38% vs 45% (p=.45). Toxicity data have been previously published; overall 13 pts (6%) had treatment-related death (preop 2, postop 11). Conclusions: This preoperative combined modality regimen was feasible and highly active in a community-based setting. This is one of the largest series of patients treated with an identical preoperative approach and with long-term followup is curative in one-third of pts with localized esophageal cancer. [Table: see text]

704 Background: Gemcitabine is an exciting novel deoxcytidine analog demonstrating synergism, when combined with trastuzumab, in human breast cancer cell lines. Trastuzumab plus chemotherapy, has y...

7123 Background: Adjuvant therapy with P (200mg/m2)/C (AUC=6) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles is associated with a 13% increase of survival in stage IB NSCLC patients (pts) (Late/breaking abstracts from...

8014 Background: Hot flashes are a prominent symptom in breast cancer survivors. Available data demonstrate that both venlafaxine and progestational agents substantially decrease hot flashes. This trial was developed to compare these two agents. Methods: 227 women, reporting at least 14 hot flashes/wk were randomized to venlafaxine (37.5 mg/day for a wk, then 75 mg/d, 109 pts) versus MPA (400 mg IM, 109 pts) versus MPA (500 mg IM q 2 w for 3 doses, 9 pts, arm closed early due to slow initial study accrual), after being stratified for age, tamoxifen use, raloxifene use, and the duration and frequency of hot flash symptoms. Assuming 109 pts per each of the 2 main study arms, this study had 90% power to detect a difference between the two treatments of 1 hot flash per day, or a drop of 16% from baseline, with a 5% Type I error. Results: At this time, data are reported for 185 evaluable pts (81%). All examined pretreatment factors were equally balanced between the two major treatment groups. 90% of participan...

One-hundred-three patients with extensive non-small-cell lung cancer were entered into a prospective, randomized trial to determine the value of MER as an adjuvant to chemotherapy. Patients were stratified according to histology and performance status. All patients received CCNU, methotrexate, and Adriamycin with 48 patients also receiving MER. All patients had a performance status of 2 or less (less than 50% bedridden), 49% had prior radiation therapy, only one patient had prior chemotherapy, and all had extensive disease. Of the patients, 42% had epidermoid cancer, 21% had large cell cancer, 32% had adenocarcinoma, and 4% had mixed adenosquamous or undifferentiated carcinoma. The response rates and response durations of the two treatment regimens were similar. Of the patients, 18% had an objective response; in 4% it was complete. An additional 29% had a stable response. Median duration of response ranged from 21 to 23 weeks. Median survival rates for non-MER and MER treatment groups were 21.5 and 18.6 weeks, respectively. The four complete responders have a survival of 24, 85, 86+, and 129 weeks. MER did not improve response for hematopoietic tolerance, was associated with significant morbidity, and was poorly tolerated. The value of immunotherapy in lung cancer remains to be established.

Three hundred and ninety-eight patients with disseminated solid tumors other than breast cancer, were treated with a combination chemotherapy protocol utilizing cyclophosphamide, vincristine sulfate, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and prednisone. Three hundred and eighty were evaluable (95.5%). Partial or complete tumor regressions were noted in 73 of 380 (19%) evaluable patients. Response to therapy was associated with a prolongation and survival. The largest tumor categories were lung, ovary, and gastrointestinal. The proportion of complete plus partial responses in evaluable lung cancer patients was 40/236 (17%), compared to 20/44 (45%) for ovarian cancer patients and 6/39 (15%) for gastrointestinal tumors. Of the patients who could be evaluated for toxicity, 47% had minimal or no toxicity, 51% had moderate to severe toxicity, and 2% had life threatening toxicity. Virtually all patients were treated and managed as outpatients.

A general theory relating the orientation of the transition moment in a chromophore to incident light, linearly polarized at an arbitrary angle, is discussed for cylindrical molecules. Experimental verification of this theory is presented for molecules of tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), T(2) DNA, and polyadenylic acid (poly-A).

In experiments designed to determine the thermal stability and bonding strength of a natural nucleoprotein structure, the loss of birefringence as a function of time and temperature was investigated for both mammalian and nonmammalian sperm nuclei. At a constant temperature, this reaction was found to be first order for both types over a range of temperatures. The methods of chemical kinetics applied to results of these reactions, called birefringence melting reactions, produced values for the enthalpy and entropy of activation in the reactions, which gave some indication of the strength of binding in the nucleoprotein structure; and these results, plus those on the influence of chemicals on the structure, were consistent with the molecular structures which have been proposed by others for the nucleoprotein complex of sperm nuclei. For both bull and human sperm in ethylene glycol, the rate-limiting step in the melting reactions appeared to be the breakage of disulfide bonds. For squid sperm in ethylene glycol, and bull or squid sperm in ethylene glycol plus ß-mercaptoethanol, the identity of this step was more ambiguous, but a possibility consistent with these and other results would be a cooperative breakage of ionic bonds.

Purpose This phase II study (S9914) evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of the three-drug combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and topotecan with granulocyte colony–stimulating factor support in previously untreated patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer. Patients and Methods Patients with newly diagnosed extensive stage small cell lung cancer received topotecan 1.0 mg/m 2 intravenously on days 1 through 4; paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2 intravenously on day 4, and carboplatin AUC=5 intravenously on day 4, treatments were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles. All patients also received granulocyte colony–stimulating factor 5 μg/kg/day beginning on day 5 of each cycle. Results A total of 88 patients were enrolled on the study; 79 patients were assessable for survival and toxicity and 74 patients for response. Objective response was observed in 50 patients (68%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 56%–78%) with nine patients (12%) achieving a complete response. Median progression-free survival was 7 months (95% CI: 6–8 months) and median overall survival was 12 months (95% CI: 11–14 months). The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 48% (95% CI: 37%–59%) and 20% (95% CI: 11%–29%), respectively. The most common toxicities were hematologic. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was noted in 17 (22%) and 27 (34%) patients, respectively. Febrile neutropenia developed in only four patients. Two patients (3%) died of treatment-related causes. Conclusion The combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and topotecan combined with granulocyte colony–stimulating factor support is an active and reasonably well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

The Jamshidi-Swaim biopsy needle was utilized to perform 205 bone marrow biopsies, accompanied by simultaneous bone marrow aspirates, on patients with lymphoma, leukaemia, and a variety of solid tumours. There was no significant morbidity. There were 67 positive findings with biopsy and 42 with aspiration. The two techniques were complementary in Hodgkin's disease, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, breast carcinoma, bronchogenic carcinoma, malignant melanoma, and in leukaemia. We have examined the bone marrow biopsies and aspirates with respect to the adequacy of the bone marrow biopsy specimen, the number of positive biopsies in the various categories of neoplasia, and the disparity of biopsy and aspirate, finding that 28 of the 67 positive biopsies (41·8%) had negative aspirates. These data and specimens obtained compared quite favourably with other series in which a modification of the Vim-Silverman needle was used.

The effect of adding the epipodophyllotoxin etoposide (VP-16-213) to a standard chemotherapy regimen for patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer was evaluated during a randomized trial. Chemotherapy consisted of vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) alone or with etoposide (EVAC). Of 139 patients enrolled, 136 patients were eligible for study and all but five were evaluable for response. The overall objective response was 46% in the VAC group v 70% in the etoposide-treated group (P = .008) with complete response (CR) rates of 12% v 29%, respectively (P = .030). Although the time to the observation of disease progression was significantly longer in the group of patients receiving etoposide (9.6 v 6.5 months, P = .010), overall survival was similar; this was probably due to administration of other agents including etoposide at the time of VAC failure. However, there were noteworthy differences in long-term (greater than or equal to 2 year) survival. Whereas only four (6%) patients treated with VAC lived 2 years, 11 (16%) of the etoposide-treated group did so (P = .100). Two-year failure-free survival was attained in one (2%) of the VAC patients and eight (11%) of the patients treated with etoposide (P = .034). Long-term survivorship, heretofore usually reported in patients with limited stage disease after a variety of treatments, may be possible with this drug combination in the setting of extensive disease.

Publisher Summary This chapter focuses on the analysis of results of experiments conducted to study adjunctive transfer factor (TF) in osteogenic sarcoma. Cryopreservation methods were used by the team in the laboratories to provide serial cell-mediated immunity (CMI) testing in patients with osteogenic sarcoma and in addition, evaluate potential transfer factor donors for maximum antitumor activity. Preservative free sodium heparin was used in all experiments at 50 units/ml and samples were collected as far removed from medication or chemotherapy as possible. It was reported that cryopreservation of cells-separated and purified tumor cells and lymphocytes were frozen in the manner described by Ryan and Smith. The results prove that the usefulness and availability of cryopreserved human lymphocytes and early passage, primary osteogenic sarcoma cells serve as excellent study models for the serial evaluation of tumor patients during adjunctive chemo-immunotherapy. They also suggest that the adjunctive use of surgery, early immunotherapy and COMPADRI II chemotherapy may provide a workable protocol for maximizing the effectiveness of all parameters that can aid host defense mechanisms in tumor eradication and eventual cure.

PURPOSE: To determine whether an intensive weekly chemotherapy regimen plus thoracic irradiation is superior to standard chemotherapy in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ESCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with ESCLC were considered eligible for the study if they were younger than 68 years, had a performance status of 0 to 2, and were free of brain metastases. Patients were randomized to receive cisplatin, vincristine, doxorubicin, and etoposide (CODE) or alternating cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine/etoposide and cisplatin (CAV/EP). Consolidative thoracic irradiation and prophylactic cranial irradiation were given to patients responding to CODE and according to investigator discretion on the CAV/EP arm. RESULTS: The fidelity of drug delivery on both drug regimens was equal, and more than 70% of all patients received the intended protocol chemotherapy. Although rates of neutropenic fever were similar, nine (8.2%) of 110 patients on the CODE arm died during chemotherapy, whereas one (0.9%) of 109 patients died on the CAV/EP arm. Response rates after chemotherapy were higher (P = .006) with CODE (87%) than with CAV/EP (70%). However, progression-free survival (median of 0.66 years on both arms) and overall survival (median, 0.98 years for CODE and 0.91 years for CAV/EP) were not statistically different. CONCLUSION: The CODE regimen increased two-fold the received dose-intensity of four of the most active drugs in small-cell lung cancer compared with the standard CAV/EP regimen while maintaining an approximately equal total dose. Despite supportive care (but not routine prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor), there was excessive toxic mortality with the CODE regimen. The response rate with CODE was higher than that of CAV/EP, but progression-free and overall survival were not significantly improved. In view of increased toxicity and similar efficacy, the CODE chemotherapy regimen is not recommended for treatment of ESCLC.

• Four teenagers with severe aplastic anemia, initially diagnosed and evaluated over a seven-year period at The Johns Hopkins Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Baltimore, were residents of the same small town in South Carolina. Estimated annual incidence for that age group in the town, based on the four cases, was 100 times the expected rate. All four of the teenagers had attended one of two junior high schools. An exploratory survey of all high-school students, comparing risk factors of those who had attended the "affected" junior high school with those who had attended the "unaffected" junior high school, showed no associations with exposure to glue, paint or varnishes, pesticides, history of hepatitis or infectious mononucleosis, or use of chloramphenicol or other suspected drugs. Weak associations were found between the affected junior high school and employment in the textile industry and in agriculture (specifically peach orchards). ( Arch Intern Med 1985;145:635-640)