51. Efficacy and Cardiovascular Safety of Roxadustat in Dialysis-Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease: Pooled Analysis of Four Phase 3 Studies
- Author
-
Ciro Esposito, James Young, Michael Schömig, Michael Reusch, Botond Csiky, Władysław Sułowicz, and Jonathan Barratt
- Subjects
Epoetin alfa ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.drug_class ,Anemia ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Population ,Glycine ,Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent ,Cardiovascular ,Hemoglobins ,Renal Dialysis ,Chronic kidney disease ,hemic and lymphatic diseases ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Darbepoetin alfa ,Pharmacology (medical) ,cardiovascular diseases ,Renal Insufficiency, Chronic ,education ,Erythropoietin ,Dialysis ,Original Research ,education.field_of_study ,business.industry ,Hazard ratio ,General Medicine ,Isoquinolines ,medicine.disease ,Roxadustat ,Hematinics ,business ,Mace ,Kidney disease ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Introduction This integrated phase 3 analysis examined efficacy and cardiovascular safety for roxadustat vs erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in dialysis-dependent patients. Methods Efficacy and safety results from four phase 3, randomized, open-label studies comparing roxadustat to ESAs (PYRENEES, SIERRAS, HIMALAYAS, ROCKIES) in dialysis-dependent patients with anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) were evaluated by study, pooled population and in two subgroups: incident dialysis and stable dialysis. The primary efficacy endpoint per study was hemoglobin change from baseline (CFB) to weeks 28–36 using least-squares mean difference (LSMD) without rescue therapy. Pooled safety endpoints included time to major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality [ACM]) and MACE+ (MACE plus congestive heart failure or unstable angina requiring hospitalization), ACM, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). MACE and MACE+ were evaluated for non-inferiority at 1.8 and 1.3 margins using hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). TEAEs were descriptively summarized. Results In total, 4714 patients were randomized (2354 roxadustat; 2360 ESA). Hemoglobin CFB to weeks 28–36 achieved non-inferiority for roxadustat vs ESA in each study. Roxadustat was non-inferior to ESA for risks for MACE and MACE+ in the entire cohort (MACE: HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.95–1.26; MACE+ : HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.86–1.11) and similar to the incident dialysis and stable dialysis subgroups; ACM results were consistent with MACE and MACE+ (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.95–1.34). TEAEs were generally comparable between groups. Conclusion Roxadustat improved hemoglobin similarly to ESA while demonstrating comparable cardiovascular and overall safety profiles in a wide spectrum of dialysis-dependent patients with anemia of CKD. Roxadustat represents an oral alternative to ESAs for achieving a target hemoglobin for anemia of CKD in dialysis-dependent patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01903-7.
- Published
- 2021