Search

Aim: To determine the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and to evaluate the relation of previous and persistent chlamydial infection to ectopic pregnancy (EP) among women in Khon Kaen, Thailand. Methods: We enrolled 32 EP patients in the case group. Control subjects were 57 women undergoing tubal ligation after normal labor. Serum immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgA antibodies to C. trachomatis were determined using ELISA. Chlamydial DNA was investigated using polymerase chain reaction. Results: The prevalence of chlamydial DNA in fallopian tube tissue was 34.38% of EP patients whereas none was detected in controls. In cervical cells, however, no significant difference in chlamydial DNA between cases (3.13%) and controls (3.51%) was detected. Serum-specific IgG was found more in the EP group than in the control group (21.88% and 5.26%, respectively; P < 0.05). Serum-specific IgA was detected in 5.26% of the control women but not in the EP group. Analysis by multivariate conditional logistic regression revealed a significant association between EP and the various risk factors. Among these, abortion, previous EP and age at first intercourse <15 years were strong predictors of EP. However, the association between specific IgG and EP became non-significant in this analysis. Conclusions: No strong independent association was shown between chlamydial antibodies and the EP risk in Thai women despite DNA detection in fallopian tube tissue. In contrast, factors including abortion, previous EP, and age at first intercourse <15 years were the significant predictors of EP. Efforts to address these other variables will help more in reducing the EP burden in Thai women compared to eliminating C. trachomatis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Over-expression of p16INK4a protein is a biomarker for human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cervical cancer. However, absence of p16INK4a protein expression in HPV-associated cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx has been reported. Among a number of possible reasons for this is methylation, which is frequently noted in the promoter region of p16INK4a and is associated with silencing of the gene and disease severity. Methods: We investigated the relationships between p16INK4a protein expression, HPV infection and methylation status of the p16INK4a promoter in cancers of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Fifty-three formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cancer tissue samples from the oral cavity (49 cases) and oropharynx (4 cases) were studied. P16INK4a protein expression was determined using immunohistochemical staining (IHC). Additional oral tissues lacking squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs), and cervical tissues with high-level SILs, were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. High-risk HPV infection was detected using HPV E6/E7 mRNA in situ hybridization. Methylation status of the p16INK4a promoter was investigated using sodium bisulfite treatment and methylation-specific PCR (MS-PCR). Results: HPV infection was found in 40.8% (20/49) and 50.0% (2/4) of oral cavity and oropharynx cancers, respectively. Promoter methylation of p16INK4a occurred in 73.6 % of all cases and differed significantly in frequency between HPV-positive (90.9%, 20/22) and HPV-negative (61.3%, 19/31) samples. Expression of p16INK4a was found in 35.8% (19/53) and commonly detected in samples with p16INK4a unmethylation (79.5%). Interestingly, the silencing of p16INK4a (64.2%, 34/53) was significantly associated with methylation status (91.2%, 31/34), especially in HPV-infected samples in which the p16INK4a promoter was methylated (52.9%, 18/34). Conclusions: This result demonstrated high frequency of p16INK4a promoter methylation status in HPV-associated HNSCC subsets that could influence the silent p16INK4a expression and might promote disease severity., (Creative Commons Attribution License)

High risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) E2 proteins play roles in transcriptional regulation and are commonly functionally disrupted when the HPV genome integrates into host chromosomes. Some 15-40% of cancer cases, however, contain an intact E2 gene or episomal HPV. In these cases, polymorphism of the E2 gene might be involved. This study aimed to determine polymorphisms of the E2 gene in episomal HPV16 detected in high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and squamous cell carcinomas and altered functions compared to the E2 prototype. The E2 gene was amplified and sequenced. Two expression vectors containing E2 gene polymorphisms were constructed and transfected in SiHa and C33A cells, then E6 gene as well as Il- 10 and TNF-α expression was determined by quantitative RT-PCR. Expression vectors and reporter vectors containing the HPV16 long control region (LCR) were co-transfected and transcriptional activity was determined. The results showed that a total of 32 nucleotides and 23 amino acids were changed in all 20 cases of study, found in the transactivation (TA) domain, hinge (H) region and DNA binding (DB) domain with 14, 5 and 13 nucleotide positions. They mostly caused amino acid change. The expressing vectors containing different E2 gene polymorphisms showed E6 mRNA suppression, TNF-α mRNA suppression and IL-10 induction but no statistically significant differences when compared to the E2 prototype. Moreover, promoter activity in HPV16 LCR was not affected by E2 protein with different gene polymorphisms, in contrast to nucleotide variations in LCR that showed an effect on transcription activity. These results demonstrated that E2 gene polymorphisms of episomal HPV16 did not affect transcriptional regulation and suggested that nucleotide variation as well as epigenetic modification of the LCR might play a role in inducing malignant transformation of cells containing episomal HPV16.

Thailand is in the process of developing a national cervical screening program. This study examined p16INK4a staining and HPV prevalence in abnormal cervical samples with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), to evaluate the efficacy of combined HPV and p16INK4a detection to predict CIN II-III. Totals of 125 ASCUS and 87 LSIL cases were re-evaluated by Pap test and cervical cells of ASCUS and LSIL cases were prepared on slides for p16INK4a detection by immunocytochemistry. HPV genotyping of DNA extracts was performed by GP5+/6+ PCR and reverse line blot hybridization. Histopathologic tests were performed to identify cervical lesion. Total of 212 cases were diagnosed to normal (20), ASCUS (112), LSIL (78) and HSIL (2). HPV was detected in ASCUS (49/112, 43.8%), LSIL (60/78, 76.9%) and HSIL (2/2, 100%) cases. The majority of HPV positive samples typed for high-risk HPV. 55.7% (107/192) of abnormal cases (ASCUS, LSIL and HSIL) were positive p16INK4a. For the 111 HPV DNA positive cases, 34 of 49 (69.4%) ASCUS cases and 49 of 60 (81.7%) LSIL cases were p16INK4a positive. 140 biopsies were taken and histological classified: CIN negative (65 cases), CIN I (56 cases) and CIN II-III (19 cases). HPV DNA detection predicted CIN II-III with sensitivity and specificity of 84% and 49%, whereas p16INK4a staining showed higher sensitivity (89.5%) and specificity (56.2%). The prediction of CIN II-III was significantly better by combination of positive HPV DNA and p16INK4a with 93.8% sensitivity and 59.2% specificity. Detection of HPV DNA combined with p16INK4a in cervical cells can predict CIN II-III and may improve the screening diagnosis of Thai women at risk for CIN II-III or cancer.

High risk human papillomaviruses (HR-HPVs) are associated with increased risk of normal cervical cells developing to dysplasia and cervical carcinoma. Therefore, HR-HPV DNA testing can predict an endpoint of cervical carcinogenesis that is earlier than the development of cervical abnormalities. Not only the sensitivity of methods but also the amount of HPV DNA are very important and might be parameters to distinguish HPV detection. In this study, we evaluated the effects of primer sets and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) performance with low viral load samples with normal cervical cytology (140 samples) and mild dysplasia (140 samples) using two consensus primers MY09/MY11 and GP5+/6+. The PCR was performed with single and nested PCR. Positive samples with both primer sets were then HPV genotyped by dot blot hybridization. Results showed higher sensitivity of single PCR using primer GP5+/GP6+ than primer MY09/MY11. HPV DNA was detected in 15% (21 of 140)and 20.7% (29 of 140) of normal cervical samples, respectively. For mild dysplasia samples, HPV DNA was detected in 37.1% (52 of 140) with MY09/MY11 and 50% (70 of 140) using GP5+/GP6+. In normal cervical samples, the positivity rate was increased to 38.5% (54 of 140) by nested PCR using primer GP5+/6+, but only 2 mild dysplasia samples that were negative by single GP5+/6+ were positive by auto-nested PCR. These results suggested that, in low viral load samples, the sensitivity of HPV DNA detection depends not only on primer sets but also PCR performance. HPV 16 was the most common in mild dysplasia samples (20.8%), whereas HPV type 58 was found in 11.1%. This study suggested that nested PCR might be necessary for HPV DNA detection in cervical samples of women participating in cervical cancer screening.