Search

BackgroundSentinel node biopsy is a surgical technique to explore lymph nodes for surgical staging of endometrial cancer, which has replaced full retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. However, the effectiveness of sentinel node biopsy, its value to patients, and potential harms compared with no-node dissection have never been shown in a randomized trial.Primary ObjectivesStage 1 will test recovery from surgery. Stage 2 will compare disease-free survival at 4.5 years between patients randomized to sentinel node biopsy versus no retroperitoneal node dissection.Study HypothesisThe primary hypothesis for stage 1 is that treatment with sentinel node biopsy will not cause detriment to patient outcomes (lymphedema, morbidity, loss of quality of life) and will not increase treatment-related morbidity or health services costs compared with patients treated without a retroperitoneal node dissection at 12 months after surgery. The primary hypothesis for stage 2 is that disease-free survival at 4.5 years after surgery in patients without retroperitoneal node dissection is not inferior to those receiving sentinel node biopsy.Trial DesignThis phase III, open-label, two-arm, multistage, randomized non-inferiority trial (ENDO-3) will determine the value of sentinel node biopsy for surgical management of endometrial cancer. Patients with endometrial cancer are randomized to receive: (1) laparoscopic/robotic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with sentinel node biopsy or (2) laparoscopic/robotic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy without retroperitoneal node dissection. In stage 1, 444 patients will be enrolled to demonstrate feasibility and quality of life. If this is demonstrated, we will enroll another 316 patients in stage 2.Major Inclusion and Exclusion CriteriaInclusion criteria include women aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed endometrial cancer; clinical stage 1, who meet the criteria for laparoscopic or robotic total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Patients with uterine mesenchymal tumors are excluded.Primary EndpointsThe endpoint for stage 1 is surgical recovery, with the proportion of patients returning to usual daily activities at 3 months post-surgery as measured with the EQ-5D. Stage 2 is disease-free survival at 4.5 years.Sample Size760 participants (both stages).Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting ResultsStage 1 commenced in January 2021 and is planned to be completed in December 2024 when 444 participants have completed 12 months' follow-up. Stage 2 will enroll a further 316 participants for a total of 760 patients.Trial RegistrationNCT04073706.

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a screening test for fetal chromosomal aneuploidy using cell-free DNA derived from maternal blood. It has been rapidly accepted into obstetric practice because of its application from 10-weeks' gestation, and its high sensitivity and specificity. NIPT results can be influenced by several factors including placental or maternal mosaicism and co-twin demise; cell-free DNA from a maternal origin can also complicate interpretation, with evidence that NIPT can detect previously unsuspected malignancies. This study aimed to develop management guidelines for women with NIPT results suspicious of maternal malignancy. The Peter MacCallum Cancer Center's experience of seven cases where abnormal NIPT results led to investigation for maternal malignancy between 2016 and 2019 were reviewed, along with the published literature. Six of the seven women (86%) referred for investigation were diagnosed with advanced malignancies, including colorectal cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma. Based on our single-center experience, as well as the available literature, guidelines for the investigation of women with NIPT results suspicious of malignancy are proposed, including utilization of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography, which had a high concordance with other investigations and diagnoses. These guidelines include maternal and fetal investigations, as well as consideration of the complex medical, psychologic, social, and ethical needs of these patients and their families.

BackgroundPhysical symptoms, anxiety, depression, fear of recurrence, sexual dysfunction, and social withdrawal are common in women after treatment for ovarian cancer. Most patients would like and need help dealing with these symptoms. The traditional model of follow-up care is unstructured and largely focused on diagnosing recurrent disease, and most oncologists lack skills to identify and manage psychosocial issues. No high quality prospective clinical trials have been conducted to determine the optimal follow-up regimen or the cost effectiveness of ovarian cancer surveillance strategies.Primary Objective(s)To assess emotional wellbeing, acceptability, safety, and cost effectiveness of nurse led follow-up via telehealth for women with ovarian cancer following completion of primary treatment.Study HypothesisWe hypothesize that compared with routine clinic based follow-up, nurse led follow-up via telehealth, including serum CA125 monitoring and completion of a patient reported outcome instrument, the Measure of Ovarian Symptoms and Treatment concerns-Surveillance (MOST-S26), will improve emotional wellbeing in women with ovarian cancer; be feasible, safe, acceptable, and not delay the time to diagnosis of recurrent disease; will result in greater patient satisfaction; will identify more patients with psychological distress, lead to better care, and improved psychological outcomes; and be cost-effective.Trial DesignPhase II multicenter randomized trial comparing 3 monthly nurse led telehealth consultations that include serum CA125 monitoring and completion of the MOST-S26, with routine clinic based follow-up. The allocation ratio will be 1:1.Major Inclusion/Exclusion CriteriaEligible patients will be women with high grade epithelial ovarian cancer who have normalized serum CA125 (to Primary Endpoint(s)Emotional wellbeing at 12 months.Sample Size150 patients.Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting ResultsJuly 2023. Results expected in 2025, 24 months after the last participant is enrolled.Trial RegistrationACTRN12620000332921

Palliative care improves outcomes for patients with thoracic cancer; however, limited evidence exists for the benefits of this approach for caregivers. This study aimed to advance understanding of the experiences of palliative care described by bereaved caregivers.Fifteen adult caregivers completed semi-structured interviews following prior participation in a randomised controlled trial of early referral to palliative care versus discretionary referral to palliative care. Interviews explored caregiver experiences of palliative care delivery. Interview transcripts were thematically analysed.Four related themes about the experiences of palliative care were identified, each of which required sufficient time between palliative care first contact and death: 'relationship building'; 'clear communication and information'; 'access to practical support'; and 'access to psychosocial support'. The core category underpinning these themes was palliative care facilitates caregiver preparedness. Caregivers noted that palliative care played a critical role in preparing them for the future and described a sense of practical and emotional 'relief' associated with the support services made available to them.Our findings emphasise that palliative care can have a positive impact on caregivers' preparedness for providing the care needed by thoracic cancer patients and that this can improve the experiences of both caregivers and patients.

Contains fulltext : 241226.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) BACKGROUND: Olaparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, has previously been shown to extend progression-free survival versus placebo when given to patients with relapsed high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer who were platinum sensitive and who had a BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutation, as part of the SOLO2/ENGOT-Ov21 trial. The aim of this final analysis is to investigate the effect of olaparib on overall survival. METHODS: This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial was done across 123 medical centres in 16 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status at baseline of 0-1, had histologically confirmed, relapsed, high-grade serous or high-grade endometrioid ovarian cancer, including primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer, and had received two or more previous platinum regimens. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive olaparib tablets (300 mg in two 150 mg tablets twice daily) or matching placebo tablets using an interactive web or voice-response system. Stratification was by response to previous chemotherapy and length of platinum-free interval. Treatment assignment was masked to patients, treatment providers, and data assessors. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival has been reported previously. Overall survival was a key secondary endpoint and was analysed in all patients as randomly allocated. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one treatment dose. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01874353, and is no longer recruiting patients. FINDINGS: Between Sept 3, 2013 and Nov 21, 2014, 295 patients were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either olaparib (n=196 [66%]) or placebo (n=99 [34%]). One patient, randomised in error, did not receive olaparib. Median follow-up was 65·7 months (IQR 63·6-69·3) with olaparib and 64·5 months (63·4-68·7) with placebo. Median overall survival was 51·7 months (95% CI 41·5-59·1) with olaparib and 38·8 months (31·4-48·6) with placebo (hazard ratio 0·74 [95% CI 0·54-1·00]; p=0·054), unadjusted for the 38% of patients in the placebo group who received subsequent PARP inhibitor therapy. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse event was anaemia (which occurred in 41 [21%] of 195 patients in the olaparib group and two [2%] of 99 patients in the placebo group). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 50 (26%) of 195 patients receiving olaparib and eight (8%) of 99 patients receiving placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events with a fatal outcome occurred in eight (4%) of the 195 patients receiving olaparib, six of which were judged to be treatment-related (attributed to myelodysplastic syndrome [n=3] and acute myeloid leukaemia [n=3]). INTERPRETATION: Olaparib provided a median overall survival benefit of 12·9 months compared with placebo in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation. Although statistical significance was not reached, these findings are arguably clinically meaningful and support the use of maintenance olaparib in these patients. FUNDING: AstraZeneca and Merck.

BackgroundAromatase inhibitors are standard of care for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (LGESS), based on very high response rates reported in retrospective studies. We evaluated the activity of anastrozole in recurrent/metastatic LGESS patients enrolled in PARAGON, a basket trial of anastrozole in estrogen receptor (ER±)/progesterone receptor (PR+) gynecological cancers.MethodAn investigator-initiated, single-arm, prospective open-label trial of anastrozole 1 mg/day in patients with ER ± PR + ve LGESS with measurable disease, treated until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was clinical benefit (complete/partial response + stable disease) rate (CBR) at 3 months. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life and toxicity.Results15 eligible patients were enrolled. CBR at 3 months was 73% (95% CI: 48–89.1%); unchanged at 6 months. Best response was 26.7%, including complete response in one (6.7%; 95% CI 1.2–29.8%), partial response in three (20%, 95% CI 7.1–45.2%) and stable disease in seven (46.7%). Four patients ceased treatment by 3 months due to progression. Median PFS was not reached (25th percentile: 2.9 months (95% CI: 1.2–NR)). PFS was 73.3%, 73.3% and 66% at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. Six patients remained on treatment for an average of 44.2 months (range 34.5–63.6) up until data cut. Toxicity was as expected, with 3 patients stopping due to adverse effects.ConclusionThe 26.7% objective response rate with anastrozole is lower than reported in retrospective series, but the CBR was high and durable. The results underscore the importance of prospective trials in rare cancers.KeywordsAromatase inhibitorsAnastrazoleEndometrial stromalsarcomasUterine sarcoma

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) constitutes a group of metastatic cancers in which standardized clinical investigations fail to identify a tissue of origin (TOO). Gene-expression profiling (GEP) has been used to resolve TOO, and DNA sequencing to identify potential targeted treatments; however, these methods have not been widely applied together in CUP patients. To assess the diagnostic utility of DNA and RNA tests for TOO classification, we applied GEP classification and/or gene-panel DNA sequencing in 215 CUP patients. Based on a retrospective review of pathology reports and clinical data, 77% of the cohort were deemed True-CUPs (T-CUP). Among the remaining cases, a latent primary diagnosis (10%) (LP-CUP) or TOO was highly suspected based on combined clinicopathological data (13%) (histology-resolved CUP, HR-CUP). High-medium confidence GEP classifications were made for 80% of LP/HR-CUPs, and these classifications were consistent with a pathologist-assigned diagnosis in 94% of cases, while only 56% of T-CUPs had high-medium confidence predictions. The frequency of somatic mutations in cancer genes was similar to 2,785 CUPs from AACR GENIE Project. DNA features, GEP classification, and oncovirus detection assisted making a TOO diagnosis in 37% of T-CUPs. Gene mutations and mutational signatures of diagnostic utility were found in 31% T-CUPs. GEP classification was useful in 13% of cases and viral detection in 4%. Among resolved T-CUPs, lung and biliary were the most frequently identified cancer types, while kidney cancer represented another minor subset. Multivariate survival analysis showed that unresolved T-CUPs had poorer overall survival than LP/HR-CUPs (Hazard ratio=1.9, 95% CI 1.1 − 3.2, p=0.016), while the risk of death was similar in genomically-resolved T-CUPs and LP/HR-CUPs. In conclusion, combining DNA and RNA profiling with clinicopathological data supported a putative TOO diagnosis in over a third of T-CUPs. DNA sequencing benefited T-CUP tumors with atypical transcriptional patterns that hindered reliable GEP classification.

Immunotherapy (IT) and targeted therapy (TT) have improved survival for some patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Their lived experience is under-studied. We conducted a single centre, qualitative study to understand concerns and unmet needs amongst this novel survivor population. Eligible participants had metastatic NSCLC, aged >18, English-speaking and >6 months post initiation of IT/TT without progressive disease. Semi-structured interviews focused on physical, psychological, social and functional impacts of diagnosis, therapy and prognosis. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed via qualitative thematic analysis. Between May and December 2019, 20 participants were interviewed: median age 62 (range 34–83), 13 (65%) female; median time since diagnosis of metastatic NSCLC 27 months (range 10–108). Twelve out of 20 (60%) participants had a targetable mutation (EGFR/ALK/BRAF); 6 were receiving IT, 11 TT, 2 IT + chemotherapy and 1 IT + TT. Four main themes were identified: living long-term on IT and TT (chronic toxicities), psychological concerns (living with uncertainty, fear of cancer progression, scan-related anxiety), support with practical issues (finances, employment amidst prognostic uncertainty, challenges with trial participation) and wanting information pertinent to NSCLC subtype. Longer-term survivors of metastatic NSCLC experience significant physical, psychological and functional concerns and unmet needs. Results will inform a broader cross-sectional survey and resources to address the needs of this growing survivor group. A ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to NSCLC survivorship is no longer appropriate. Survivors of metastatic NSCLC treated with novel therapies may benefit from specific information regarding long-term toxicities and psychological supports.

TP53 mutations are implicated in the progression of mucinous borderline tumors (MBOT) to mucinous ovarian carcinomas (MOC). Optimized immunohistochemistry (IHC) for TP53 has been established as a proxy for the TP53 mutation status in other ovarian tumor types. We aimed to confirm the ability of TP53 IHC to predict TP53 mutation status in ovarian mucinous tumors and to evaluate the association of TP53 mutation status with survival among patients with MBOT and MOC. Tumor tissue from an initial cohort of 113 women with MBOT/MOC was stained with optimized IHC for TP53 using tissue microarrays (75.2%) or full sections (24.8%) and interpreted using established criteria as normal or abnormal (overexpression, complete absence, or cytoplasmic). Cases were considered concordant if abnormal IHC staining predicted deleterious TP53 mutations. Discordant tissue microarray cases were re-evaluated on full sections and interpretational criteria were refined. The initial cohort was expanded to a total of 165 MBOT and 424 MOC for the examination of the association of survival with TP53 mutation status, assessed either by TP53 IHC and/or sequencing. Initially, 82/113 (72.6%) cases were concordant using the established criteria. Refined criteria for overexpression to account for intratumoral heterogeneity and terminal differentiation improved concordance to 93.8% (106/113). In the expanded cohort, 19.4% (32/165) of MBOT showed evidence for TP53 mutation and this was associated with a higher risk of recurrence, disease-specific death, and all-cause mortality (overall survival: HR = 4.6, 95% CI 1.5-14.3, p = 0.0087). Within MOC, 61.1% (259/424) harbored a TP53 mutation, but this was not associated with survival (overall survival, p = 0.77). TP53 IHC is an accurate proxy for TP53 mutation status with refined interpretation criteria accounting for intratumoral heterogeneity and terminal differentiation in ovarian mucinous tumors. TP53 mutation status is an important biomarker to identify MBOT with a higher risk of mortality.

BackgroundCancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a heterogeneous group of metastatic cancers where a primary tissue of origin (TOO) is uncertain. Most patients with CUP have limited treatment options and poor survival outcomes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be efficacious in some patients with CUP, but the optimal predictive biomarkers are unknown. We therefore assessed immune and genomic biomarkers as well as predicted TOO in patients with CUP, including a subset treated with ICIs.MethodsPatients with CUP were subject to gene-expression profiling (GEP) and DNA panel sequencing. Immune and stromal-related gene expression was explored by NanoString, including genes associated with immunotherapy response (IR) in other solid malignancies. ICI responsive cancer types were assigned based on Food and Drug Administration-approved indications, and either detection of a latent primary tumor or the TOO was suspected based on genomics informed pathology review. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) and gene mutations were also assessed.ResultsA total of 219 patients with CUP were included, 215 assessed for TOO in a previous study, with the majority (163) receiving both RNA and DNA tests. Of GEP profiled cases, 33% (59/175) had a high IR gene-expression score. Of the DNA sequenced cases, 16% (32/203) had high TMB (>10 mutations/Mb), including two with mismatch repair deficiency. Low correlation was observed between TMB and an IR score (R=0.26, pConclusionsA significant fraction of CUP tumors had genomic features previously associated with ICI response. High IR score was the most sensitive predictive feature of ICI response, warranting evaluation in a larger patient series.

The COVID‐19 pandemic has placed an overwhelming burden on healthcare delivery globally. This paper examines how COVID‐19 has affected cancer care clinicians' capacity to deliver cancer care in the Australian context. We use the lens of ‘holding patients’ (drawing from attachment theory, psychology and from Australian Indigenous knowledge) to conceptualise cancer clinicians' processes of care and therapeutic relationships with patients. These notions of ‘holding’ resonate with the deep responsibility cancer care clinicians feel towards their patients. They enrich ethical language beyond duties to benefit, avoid harm, respect patients' autonomy and provide just treatment. We consider the disruptive effects of COVID‐19 on care delivery and on clinicians themselves. We then show how models of clinical ethics and other similar reflective discussion approaches are a relevant support mechanism to assist clinicians to process and make sense of COVID‐19's disruptions to their professional ethical role of holding patients during and beyond the pandemic.

Objective Radiotherapy for gynaecological cancer is associated with multiple adverse effects. This randomised controlled trial evaluated the impact of a combined nurse- and peer-led psycho-educational intervention on psychological distress, preparation for treatment, quality of life, psychosexual function, unmet needs and vaginal stenosis. Methods Eligible women had a confirmed diagnosis of gynaecological cancer, scheduled to receive radiotherapy with curative intent, aged ≥18 years, and able to read and write English. Participants randomly assigned one-to-one to either four nurse-led consultations plus four peer-led telephone sessions, or to usual care. Participants completed study measures at baseline, immediately before first radiotherapy (FU1), and four weeks (FU2), three (FU3), six (FU4), and 12 months (FU5) post radiotherapy. The primary outcomes were psychological distress at FU1 and FU2 measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Results Of 840 eligible participants, 625 were approached and 319 (51%) consented; 158 assigned to intervention, 160 to usual care with 1 withdrawing before randomisation. Between-groups differences for primary outcomes were trivial- and small-sized, (both p > 0.05). Notable effects on secondary outcomes favouring the intervention at FU2 included preparation for treatment (sensory/psychological concerns, d = 0.57; and procedural concerns, d = 0.52) and specific needs domains (sexuality needs, d = 0.38; and health system and information needs, d = 0.41). Conclusions There was no evidence that a nurse- and peer-led intervention had a beneficial effect on psychological distress compared to usual care. However, improved treatment readiness and lower health system and sexuality needs indicate the intervention may have addressed outcomes known to be important to this population.

Background Carcinoma of unknown primary origin (CUP) accounts for 2%–5% of newly diagnosed advanced malignancies, with chemotherapy as the standard of care. CUPISCO (NCT03498521) is an ongoing randomized trial using comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) to assign patients with CUP to targeted or immunotherapy treatment arms based on genomic profiling. We performed a retrospective analysis of CUP cases referred for CGP to determine how many were potentially eligible for enrollment into an experimental CUPISCO arm. Materials and Methods Centrally reviewed adenocarcinoma and undifferentiated CUP specimens in the FoundationCore database were analyzed using the hybrid capture‐based FoundationOne CDx assay (mean coverage, >600×). Presence of genomic alterations, microsatellite instability (MSI), tumor mutational burden (TMB), genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH), and programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) positivity were determined. Results A total of 96 of 303 patients (31.7%) could be matched to an experimental CUPISCO arm. Key genomic alterations included ERBB2 (7.3%), PIK3CA (6.3%), NF1 (5.6%), NF2 (4.6%), BRAF (4.3%), IDH1 (3.3%), PTEN, FGFR2, EGFR (3.6% each), MET (4.3%), CDK6 (3.0%), FBXW7, CDK4 (2.3% each), IDH2, RET, ROS1, NTRK (1.0% each), and ALK (0.7%). Median TMB was 3.75 mutations per megabase of DNA; 34 patients (11.6%) had a TMB ≥16 mutations per megabase. Three patients (1%) had high MSI, and 42 (14%) displayed high PD‐L1 expression (tumor proportion score ≥50%). gLOH could be assessed in 199 of 303 specimens; 19.6% had a score of >16%. Conclusions Thirty‐two percent of patients would have been eligible for targeted therapy in CUPISCO. Future studies, including additional biomarkers such as PD‐L1 positivity and gLOH, may identify a greater proportion potentially benefiting from CGP‐informed treatment. Clinical trial identification number. NCT03498521 Implications for Practice The findings of this retrospective analysis of carcinoma of unknown primary origin (CUP) cases validate the experimental treatment arms being used in the CUPISCO study (NCT03498521), an ongoing randomized trial using comprehensive genomic profiling to assign patients with CUP to targeted or immunotherapy treatment arms based on the presence of pathogenic genomic alterations. The findings also suggest that future studies including additional biomarkers and treatment arms, such as programmed death‐ligand 1 positivity and genomic loss of heterozygosity, may identify a greater proportion of patients with CUP potentially benefiting from comprehensive genomic profiling‐informed treatment., This article focuses on the ability of comprehensive genomic profiling to identify potentially targetable genetic alterations in cancers of unknown primary, based on the inclusion criteria for the CUPISCO clinical trial and aiming for more effective therapeutic options for patients.

ObjectivesThe primary objective of this study was to describe treatment patterns after poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Secondary objectives were to evaluate duration of response, time to first subsequent therapy, progression-free survival and overall survival.MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer treated with PARP inhibitor therapy at six Australian gynecological oncology centers. Eligible patients were identified via clinics, trial databases and pharmacy dispensing logs between January 2005 and September 2019. Information regarding clinico-pathological characteristics and treatment outcomes were collated from medical records.ResultsA total of 85 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer were identified. Of these, 61% had germline BRCA1/2 mutations, 9% had somatic BRCA1/2 mutations, 5% had confirmed homologous recombination deficiency and 25% were BRCA1/2 wildtype mutations. A total of seventy-seven (91%) patients received chemotherapy after PARP inhibitor, with fifty-six (72.7%) of these patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. Four patients (5%) had a complete response, 15 (20%) a partial response, 15 (20%) stable disease and 41 (55%) progressive disease. Median duration of response to chemotherapy was 7.0 months (range 0.2–20.4). Median time to first subsequent therapy was 17.6 and 15.1 months in patients who received a PARP inhibitor as maintenance therapy and treatment, respectively. Median progression-free survival of first line treatment after PARP inhibitor was 9.6, 3.5 and 4.6 months for platinum doublet, single agent platinum and non-platinum chemotherapy, respectively. Adjusting for age and FIGO (Federation of Gynecological Oncologists classification) stage progression-free survival did not differ between treatment groups (p=0.14). Median overall survival for the cohort was 69 months, and patients with platinum sensitive ovarian cancer had improved survival compared with those with platinum refractory or resistant disease.ConclusionPlatinum doublet chemotherapy resulted in non-significant improved progression-free survival compared with other regimens, suggesting potential independent mechanisms of resistance between PARP inhibitor and platinum compounds.

PURPOSE The ALLOCATE study was designed as a pilot to demonstrate the feasibility and clinical utility of real-time targeted molecular profiling of patients with recurrent or advanced ovarian cancer for identification of potential targeted therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 113 patients with ovarian cancer of varying histologies were recruited from two tertiary hospitals, with 99 patient cases suitable for prospective analysis. Targeted molecular and methylation profiling of fresh biopsy and archived tumor samples were performed by screening for mutations or copy-number variations in 44 genes and for promoter methylation of BRCA1 and RAD51C. RESULTS Somatic genomic or methylation events were identified in 85% of all patient cases, with potentially actionable events with defined targeted therapies (including four resistance events) detected in 60% of all patient cases. On the basis of these findings, six patients received molecularly guided therapy, three patients had unsuspected germline cancer–associated BRCA1/ 2 mutations and were referred for genetic counseling, and two intermediate differentiated (grade 2) serous ovarian carcinomas were reclassified as low grade, leading to changes in clinical management. Additionally, secondary reversion mutations in BRCA1/ 2 were identified in fresh biopsy samples of two patients, consistent with clinical platinum/poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor resistance. Timely reporting of results if molecular testing is done at disease recurrence, as well as early referral for patients with platinum-resistant cancers, were identified as factors that could improve the clinical utility of molecular profiling. CONCLUSION ALLOCATE molecular profiling identified known genomic and methylation alterations of the different ovarian cancer subtypes and was deemed feasible and useful in routine clinical practice. Better patient selection and access to a wider range of targeted therapies or clinical trials will further enhance the clinical utility of molecular profiling.

Through protein engineering and a novel pegylation strategy, a diabody specific to tumor-associated glycoprotein 72 (TAG-72) (PEG-AVP0458) has been created to optimize pharmacokinetics and bioavailability to tumor. We report the preclinical and clinical translation of PEG-AVP0458 to a first-in-human clinical trial of a diabody. Methods: Clinical translation followed characterization of PEG-AVP0458 drug product and preclinical biodistribution and imaging assessments of Iodine-124 trace labeled PEG-AVP0458 (124I-PEG-AVP0458). The primary study objective of the first-in-human study was the safety of a single protein dose of 1.0 or 10 mg/m2 124I-PEG-AVP0458 in patients with TAG-72 positive relapsed/ metastatic prostate or ovarian cancer. Secondary study objectives were evaluation of the biodistribution, tumor uptake, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity. Patients were infused with a single-dose of 124I labeled PEG-AVP0458 (3-5 mCi (111-185 MBq) for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, performed sequentially over a one-week period. Safety, pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and immunogenicity were assessed up to 28 days after infusion. Results: PEG-AVP0458 was radiolabeled with 124I and shown to retain high TAG-72 affinity and excellent targeting of TAG-72 positive xenografts by biodistribution analysis and PET imaging. In the first-in-human trial, no adverse events or toxicity attributable to 124I-PEG-AVP0458 were observed. Imaging was evaluable in 5 patients, with rapid and highly specific targeting of tumor and minimal normal organ uptake, leading to high tumor:blood ratios. Serum concentration values of 124I-PEG-AVP0458 showed consistent values between patients, and there was no significant difference in T½α and T½β between dose levels with mean (± SD) results of T½α = 5.10 ± 4.58 hours, T½β = 46.19 ± 13.06 hours. Conclusions: These data demonstrates the safety and feasibility of using pegylated diabodies for selective tumor imaging and potential delivery of therapeutic payloads in cancer patients.

To determine the impact of chemotherapy dose reductions and dose delays on progression-free survival (PFS) in women with ovarian cancer receiving first line chemotherapy in a real world prospective cohort study.Patients with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian (or peritoneal, fallopian tube) cancer enrolled in a national Australian prospective study, OPAL, who commenced three-weekly carboplatin (AUC 5 or 6) and paclitaxel 175 mg/m634 evaluable patients, 309 commenced CP and 325 DD-CP. Patient's age was similar in the two groups (median 62 years, range 21-79). All planned chemotherapy doses were completed by 66% vs 40% (p 0.001) in the CP and DD-CP groups respectively. There was at least one treatment delay in 28% vs 58% (p 0.001) in the CP and DD-CP groups, respectively, and 29% vs 49% (p 0.001), respectively, required at least a 15% dose reduction for either carboplatin or paclitaxel. Median PFS was 29.2 [22.9, 43.8] and 21.5 [19.4, 23.1] months in the CP and DD-CP groups respectively. Adjusting for age, histology and FIGO stage PFS did not differ between treatment groups. Median PFS was similar in patients irrespective of dose reduction or dose delay.Patients receiving DD-CP required more dose reductions and delays due to haematological toxicities and lower completion rates than CP without significant difference in median PFS between CP and DD-CP. Median PFS was similar in patients irrespective of dose reduction or dose delay.

Acquired resistance to PARP inhibitors (PARPi) is a major challenge for the clinical management of high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Here, we demonstrate CX-5461, the first-in-class inhibitor of RNA polymerase I transcription of ribosomal RNA genes (rDNA), induces replication stress and activates the DNA damage response. CX-5461 co-operates with PARPi in exacerbating replication stress and enhances therapeutic efficacy against homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair-deficient HGSOC-patient-derived xenograft (PDX) in vivo. We demonstrate CX-5461 has a different sensitivity spectrum to PARPi involving MRE11-dependent degradation of replication forks. Importantly, CX-5461 exhibits in vivo single agent efficacy in a HGSOC-PDX with reduced sensitivity to PARPi by overcoming replication fork protection. Further, we identify CX-5461-sensitivity gene expression signatures in primary and relapsed HGSOC. We propose CX-5461 is a promising therapy in combination with PARPi in HR-deficient HGSOC and also as a single agent for the treatment of relapsed disease., Acquired resistance limits the efficacy of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Here, the authors show that inhibition of RNA polymerase I transcription using CX-5461 increases the therapeutic efficacy of PARPi and overcomes PARPi resistance in PDX models of HGSOC.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review literature exploring experiences of cancer patients regarding their understanding of treatment-focused genomic testing as well as their information needs and related themes. METHODS: Six databases were searched for the original studies published in English language that explored patients' understanding of the information related to the genomic testing and its implications for treatment of cancer. The Mixed-Method Assessement Tool was used to examine the methodological quality of selected articles. RESULTS: There were 14 studies (5 qualitative and 9 quantitative) that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The majority of studies revealed that a considerable proportion of cancer patients lacked good undertstanding of treatment-focused genomic testing and wanted to be better informed. Some of the factors associated with poor knowledge about genomic testing were low education, older age, low income, and unemployment. The majority of people with cancer preferred face-to-face communication with their oncologists to discuss and ask questions about genomic testing and treatment. Most also wanted to receive simple, easy to understand written information about treatment-focused genomic testing. CONCLUSIONS: Genomic testing and its implications for treatment emerge as an important aspect of health care across different types of cancer. The evidence indicates that cancer patients want to understand and be well informed about treatment-focused genomic testing in order to be part of decision-making process. Further studies addressing ways to improve cancer patients' understanding and knowledge of genomic testing are needed.

Introduction/Background* The TransPORTEC Consortium was established in 2013 by the PIs and translational science representatives of the PORTEC-3 trial groups from the Netherlands, United Kingdom, Australia, Canada and France. Purpose of the collaboration is to improve treatment of endometrial cancer (EC) patients. Here, we evaluate our experience with international collaboration to identify challenges and strengths. Methodology Result(s)*: Since its establishment, TransPORTEC had a strong scientific team of chief investigators, translational leads and core members from participating groups. Twice-yearly TransPORTEC-meetings were organised to build and maintain friendships, share results and discuss new proposals. Over time, the TransPORTEC-biobank has expanded with PORTEC-trial tumour tissues and other cohorts, and is now the world’s largest set of molecularly classified ECs. The research focus has expanded to include molecular cancer immunology and digital pathology. The group’s output include 10 scientific papers and numerous posters and presentations on (inter)national meetings. Their analysis of PORTEC-3 showing differences in chemotherapy effect by molecular group led to initiating an international program with 4 clinical trials on Refining Adjuvant treatment IN endometrial cancer Based On molecular features (RAINBO) to compare personalised to standard treatment in terms of efficacy, toxicity, quality of life and cost-utility (figure 1). Tumour material of all participants will be collected for translational research. To achieve this, the consortium evolved: new talented members were attracted and trial-specific and expertise teams were installed (figure 2). Despite this impacting on group equilibrium, the collaboration is continuously productive. Keys to success were frequent meetings, sharing of draft protocols and experiences with contacting (inter)national research organisations and potential funders. The first of the RAINBO trials is expected to open by the end of 2021 and the program will probably fuel translational research for years to come. Conclusion* International research collaborations are dynamic and demanding. Challenges include: balancing between a stable organisational structure and flexibility to adapt to opportunities; providing all members with a satisfying share; and acquisition of funding for academic-sponsored international trials. Strengths are the profound interaction and trust between members with different expertise and backgrounds and shared ambitions and successes, resulting in unique and innovative academic research projects with leverage.

Introduction/Background* The molecular endometrial cancer (EC) classification has proven prognostic value and can direct adjuvant treatment decisions. Despite this, a relatively large group of EC is still molecularly unclassified (NSMP-EC). In this study we aimed to identify biomarkers among high-risk NSMP-EC patients with prognostic and/or predictive relevance. Methodology Paraffin-embedded tumour material (n=423) from the PORTEC-3 HREC trial were available for analysis. All patients with NSMP-EC were selected, hence those without pathogenic POLE mutations, mismatch repair deficiency and p53-abnormal immunohistochemistry (IHC). Protein expression of L1CAM, ER and PR (ongoing) were analysed by IHC using a 10% threshold for positivity. Tumour DNA was analysed for pathogenic somatic mutations using a next generation sequencing (NGS) cancer hotspot panel. Time to recurrence was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests and Cox’s proportional hazard models. Result(s)* In total, 126 NSMP-EC were identified in PORTEC-3, the majority were hormone receptor positive (ER n=106/121, 87.6%, PR will be presented at ESGO2021). L1CAM overexpression was observed in 11.2% (n=14/125) and mutations in CTNNB1-exon-3 were identified in 34.3% (n=36/105). Clustering showed that ER-positive NSMP-EC were predominantly endometrioid EC (n=99, 93.4%), low grade (n=88, 83.0%) and L1CAM-negative (n=102, 97.1%) (figure 1). PIK3CA and KRAS mutations were present in 27.3% (n=24) and 19.3% (n=17), respectively. ER-negative NSMP-EC were frequently non-endometrioid (n=11, 73.3%), L1CAM-positive (n=11, 73.3%) and rarely harboured PTEN and CTNNB1 mutations (n=1, 7.1% and 0%, respectively). ER-positivity was associated with lower risk of recurrence (HR 0.32 [95%CI 0.14-0.70]; figure 2A), while L1CAM-overexpression and CTNNB1-exon-3 mutations were not (HR 2.25 [95%CI 0.93-5.43] and HR 1.20 [95%CI 0.57-2.54], respectively). Multivariable analysis confirmed independent favourable prognostic impact of ER-positivity and LVSI. Figure 2B shows impact of LVSI on time to recurrence among patients with ER-positive NSMP-EC. Conclusion* The vast majority of NSMP-HREC are ER-positive (87.6%) and are likely sensitive to hormonal therapy. Other treatment targets might be found in this subgroup too as 27.3% had PIK3CA and 19.3% had KRAS mutations. NSMP-EC with loss of ER-expression were often of non-endometrioid histology and had a high risk of recurrence. Future studies should investigate whether this subgroup would benefit from other systemic therapies.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has had a vast impact on cancer service delivery around the world. Previously reported results from our international survey of oncology clinicians, conducted through March-April 2020, found that clinicians reported altering management in both the curative and palliative settings and not in proportion to the COVID-19 case burden in their region of practice. This follow-up survey, conducted from 27th September to 7th November 2020, aimed to explore how attitudes and practices evolved over the 2020 pandemic period. Participants and methods Participants were medical, radiation and surgical oncologist and trainees. Surveys were distributed electronically via ESMO and other collaborating professional societies. Participants were asked to compare their practice prior to the pandemic to both the period of March-April 2020, referred to as the ‘early’ period, and the current survey period, referred to as the ‘later’ period. Results One hundred and seventy-two oncology clinicians completed the survey. The majority of respondents were medical oncologists (n = 136, 79%) and many were from Europe (n = 82, 48%). In the ‘early’ period, 88% (n = 133) of clinicians reported altering their practice compared to 63% (n = 96) in the ‘later’ period. Compared to prior to the pandemic, clinicians reported fewer new patient presentations in the ‘early’ period and a trend towards more patients presenting with advanced disease in the ‘later’ period. Conclusions Results indicate a swing back towards pre-COVID-19 practices despite an increase in the rate of cumulative COVID-19 cases across 2020. The impact of these changes on cancer associated morbidity and mortality remains to be measured over the months and years to come., Highlights • This collaborative international survey of oncology clinicians was conducted in October/November of 2020. • Findings indicate a swing back towards ‘pre-coronavirus disease’ practice. • Fewer clinicians altered practice compared to the ‘early’ period of the pandemic in 2020 (63% versus 88%). • Clinicians reported seeing more new patients and a greater proportion of patients presenting with advanced disease.

B-cells play a key role in cancer suppression, particularly when aggregated in tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS). Here, we investigated the role of B-cells and TLS in endometrial cancer (EC). Single cell RNA-sequencing of B-cells showed presence of activated/memory B-cells, cycling/germinal center B-cells and antibody-secreting cells. Differential gene expression analysis showed association of TLS with L1CAM overexpression. Immunohistochemistry and co-immunofluorescence showed L1CAM expression in mature TLS localized in the myometrial wall or at the tumor invasive border, independent of L1CAM expression the tumor. Using L1CAM as a marker, 378 of the 411 molecularly classified ECs from the PORTEC-3 biobank were evaluated. TLS were found in 19%, predominantly in mismatch-repair deficient and polymerase-epsilon mutant EC. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed strong favorable prognostic impact of TLS, independent of clinicopathological and molecular factors. Our data suggests a pivotal role of TLS in outcome of EC patients, and establishes L1CAM as a simple biomarker.Statement of significance Tertiary lymphoid structures have a pivotal role in the immune response against endometrial cancer. Presence of mature tertiary lymphoid structures can be easily assessed using L1CAM immunohistochemistry and has independent favorable predictive value for recurrence and endometrial cancer-specific survival.

Summary Aim The oral MDM2 antagonist idasanutlin inhibits the p53-MDM2 interaction, enabling p53 activation, tumor growth inhibition, and increased survival in xenograft models. Methods We conducted a Phase I study of idasanutlin (microprecipitate bulk powder formulation) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, food effect, and clinical activity in patients with advanced malignancies. Schedules investigated were once weekly for 3 weeks (QW × 3), once daily for 3 days (QD × 3), or QD × 5 every 28 days. We also analyzed p53 activation and the anti-proliferative effects of idasanutlin. Results The dose-escalation phase included 85 patients (QW × 3, n = 36; QD × 3, n = 15; QD × 5, n = 34). Daily MTD was 3200 mg (QW × 3), 1000 mg (QD × 3), and 500 mg (QD × 5). Most common adverse events were diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, decreased appetite, and thrombocytopenia. Dose-limiting toxicities were nausea/vomiting and myelosuppression; myelosuppression was more frequent with QD dosing and associated with pharmacokinetic exposure. Idasanutlin exposure was approximately dose proportional at low doses, but less than dose proportional at > 600 mg. Although inter-patient variability in exposure was high with all regimens, cumulative idasanutlin exposure over the whole 28-day cycle was greatest with a QD × 5 regimen. No major food effect on pharmacokinetic exposure occurred. MIC-1 levels were higher with QD dosing, increasing in an exposure-dependent manner. Best response was stable disease in 30.6% of patients, prolonged (> 600 days) in 2 patients with sarcoma. Conclusions Idasanutlin demonstrated dose- and schedule-dependent p53 activation with durable disease stabilization in some patients. Based on these findings, the QD × 5 schedule was selected for further development. Trial registration NCT01462175 (ClinicalTrials.gov), October 31, 2011.

Background Aromatase inhibitors have been used empirically to treat a subset of patients with hormone receptor positive uterine leiomyosarcomas(LMS) and carcinosarcomas (UCS) mainly supported by retrospective data. We evaluated the activity of anastrozole in two rare cohorts; patients with recurrent/metastatic LMS and UCS enrolled in PARAGON, a basket trial of anastrozole in estrogen receptor (ER+)/progesterone receptor positive (PR+) gynecological cancers. Method An investigator-initiated, single-arm, prospective open-label trial of anastrozole 1 mg/day in patients with ER &/or PR + ve LMS or UCS with measurable disease, treated until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was clinical benefit (complete/partial response + stable disease) rate (CBR) at 3 months. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life and toxicity. Results 39 eligible patients were enrolled, 32 with LMS and 7 with UCS. For the LMS cohort CBR at 3 months was 35% (95% CI: 21–53%) with a median duration of clinical benefit of 5.8 months. Best response was a partial response in one patient. Two patients remained on treatment for more than one year. The median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% CI: 2.6–4.9). For the UCS cohort CBR at 3 months was 43% (95% CI: 16–75%) with a median duration of clinical benefit of 5.6 months. Stable disease was seen in 3 patients but no objective responses were seen. The median progression-free survival was 2.7 months (95% CI, 1.1–8.2). Safety was acceptable with 5/39 evaluable patients showing grade 3 toxicities. Conclusion Whilst objective response rates with anastrozole are low, the clinical benefit rate and good tolerance suggests that aromatase inhibitor therapy may have a role in a subset of patients with metastatic LMS and UCS.

INTRODUCTION: The Australian Council on Healthcare Standards (ACHS) sponsored an expert-led, consensus-driven, four-stage process, based on a modified Delphi methodology, to determine a set of clinical indicators as quality measures of cancer service provision in Australia. This was done in response to requests from institutional health care providers seeking accreditation, which were additional and complementary to the existing radiation oncology set. The steering group members comprised multidisciplinary key opinion leaders and a consumer representative. Five additional participants constituted the stakeholder group, who deliberated on the final indicator set. METHODS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: An initial meeting of the steering group scoped the high level nature of the desired set. In stage 2, 65 candidate indicators were identified by a literature review and a search of international metrics. These were ranked by survey, based on ease of data accessibility and collectability and clinical relevance. The top 27 candidates were debated by the stakeholder group and culled to a final set of 16 indicators. A user manual was created with indicators mapped to clinical codes. The indicator set was ratified by the Clinical Oncology Society of Australia and is now available for use by health care organisations participating in the ACHS Clinical Indicator Program. This inaugural cancer clinical indicator set covers high level assessment of various critical processes in cancer service provision in Australia. Regular reviews and updates will ensure usability. CHANGES IN MANAGEMENT AS A RESULT OF THIS STATEMENT: This is the inaugural indicator set for cancer care for use across Australia and internationally under the ACHS Clinical Indicator Program. Multidisciplinary involvement through a modified Delphi process selected indicators representing both generic and specific aspects of care across the cancer journey pathway and will provide a functional tool to compare health care delivery across multiple settings. It is anticipated that this will drive continual improvement in cancer care provision.

BackgroundIn this study, we assessed the activity of durvalumab, an antibody to programmed death ligand-1, in two cohorts of women with advanced endometrial cancers (AEC)—mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) and mismatch repair deficient (dMMR).MethodsA multicenter phase two study was performed in women with AEC with pMMR tumor progressing after one to three lines of chemotherapy and women with AEC with dMMR tumor progressing after zero to three lines of chemotherapy. Mismatch repair status was based on immunohistochemistry expression. All women received durvalumab 1500 mg given every 4 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective tumor response by RECIST V.1.1 modified for immune-based therapeutics.ResultsSeventy-one women were recruited: 35 dMMR and 36 pMMR. Median follow-up was 19 vs 21 months in dMMR versus pMMR, respectively. Median age was 67 years. Histology in dMMR versus pMMR included endometrioid (94% vs 57%) and serous (0% vs 31%) and was high grade in 26% vs 74%. The objective tumor response rate (OTRR) in the dMMR cohort was 47% (17/36, 95% CI 32 to 63), including 6 complete responses and 11 partial responses (PRs)) vs 3% in the pMMR cohort (1/35, 95% CI 1 to 15, PR). In the dMMR cohort, durvalumab was the first-line therapy in 58% (OTRR 57%) and the second-line therapy in 39% (OTRR 38%). Median progression-free survival was 8.3 months in the dMMR cohort vs 1.8 months in the pMMR cohort. The 12-month overall survival (OS) rate was 71% in dMMR vs 51% in pMMR, with median OS not reached for dMMR vs 12 months for pMMR. Immune-related adverse events occurred in 14 women, mostly grades 1–2.ConclusionDurvalumab monotherapy showed promising activity and acceptable safety in AEC with dMMR regardless of prior lines of chemotherapy, but activity was limited in AEC with pMMR.Trial registration numbersANZGOG1601, ACTRN12617000106336, and NCT03015129.

Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a unique subtype of ovarian cancer with an uncertain etiology, including whether it genuinely arises at the ovary or is metastatic disease from other organs. In addition, the molecular drivers of invasive progression, high-grade and metastatic disease are poorly defined. We perform genetic analysis of MOC across all histological grades, including benign and borderline mucinous ovarian tumors, and compare these to tumors from other potential extra-ovarian sites of origin. Here we show that MOC is distinct from tumors from other sites and supports a progressive model of evolution from borderline precursors to high-grade invasive MOC. Key drivers of progression identified are TP53 mutation and copy number aberrations, including a notable amplicon on 9p13. High copy number aberration burden is associated with worse prognosis in MOC. Our data conclusively demonstrate that MOC arise from benign and borderline precursors at the ovary and are not extra-ovarian metastases., Whether mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) arises from cells at the ovary or from metastases from other primary sites is an unanswered question. Here, Cheasley et al perform a genetic analysis of the disease, showing that MOC arises at the ovary.

Summary Background Rationale exists for combined treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in a variety of solid tumours. This study aimed to investigate the safety and antitumour effects of pamiparib, an oral PARP 1/2 inhibitor, combined with tislelizumab, a humanised anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumours and to determine the optimum doses for further evaluation. Methods We did a multicentre, open-label, phase 1a/b study at five academic sites or community oncology centres in Australia. We recruited adults (aged ≥18 years) with advanced solid tumours who had received one or more previous lines of therapy, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 1 or less, and a life expectancy of 12 weeks or more. Patients were enrolled into one of five dose-escalation cohorts, with dose-escalation done in a 3 + 3 design. Cohorts 1–3 received intravenous tislelizumab 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks plus 20, 40, or 60 mg oral pamiparib twice daily, respectively; cohorts 4 and 5 received 200 mg intravenous tislelizumab every 3 weeks plus 40 or 60 mg oral pamiparib twice daily, respectively. The primary endpoints of the phase 1a dose-escalation part of the study were safety and tolerability, including the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities and determination of the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose. All primary endpoints were analysed in the safety analysis set, which included all patients who received at least one dose of tislelizumab or pamiparib, with the exception of the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities, which was analysed in the dose-limiting toxicity analysis set, which included all patients who received at least 90% of the first scheduled tislelizumab dose and at least 75% of scheduled pamiparib doses, or who had a dose-limiting toxicity event during cycle 1. Reported here are results of the phase 1a dose-escalation stage of the trial. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT02660034 , and is ongoing. Findings Between Jan 22, 2016, and May 16, 2017, we enrolled 49 patients (median age 63 years [IQR 55–67]), all of whom received at least one dose of pamiparib or tiselzumab. Four patients had dose-limiting toxicities (intractable grade 2 nausea [n=1] and grade 3 rash [n=1] in cohort 4, and grade 2 nausea and vomiting [n=1] and grade 4 immune-mediated hepatitis [n=1] in cohort 5). The recommended phase 2 dose was tislelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus pamiparib 40 mg twice daily (the dose given in cohort 4). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea (in 31 [63%] of 49 patients), fatigue (26 [53%]), diarrhoea (17 [35%]), and vomiting (15 [31%]). 23 (47%) of 49 patients had immune-related adverse events, of whom nine (39%) had asymptomatic grade 3–4 hepatic immune-related adverse events, which were reversible with corticosteroid treatment. The most common adverse event of grade 3 or worse severity was anaemia (in six [12%] patients) and no grade 5 adverse events were reported. Hepatitis or autoimmune hepatitis was the only serious adverse event to occur in two or more patients (in four [8%] patients). At a median follow-up of 8·3 months (IQR 4·8–12·8), ten (20%) of 49 patients achieved an objective response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1, including two complete responses and eight partial responses. Interpretation Pamiparib with tislelizumab was generally well tolerated and associated with antitumour responses and clinical benefit in patients with advanced solid tumours supporting further investigation of the combination of pamiparib with tislelizumab. Funding BeiGene.

BACKGROUND:The PORTEC-3 trial investigated the benefit of combined adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy versus pelvic radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer. We updated the analysis to investigate patterns of recurrence and did a post-hoc survival analysis.METHODS:In the multicentre randomised phase 3 PORTEC-3 trial, women with high-risk endometrial cancer were eligible if they had International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage I, endometrioid grade 3 cancer with deep myometrial invasion or lymphovascular space invasion, or both; stage II or III disease; or stage I-III disease with serous or clear cell histology; were aged 18 years and older; and had a WHO performance status of 0-2. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive radiotherapy alone (48·6 Gy in 1·8 Gy fractions given on 5 days per week) or chemoradiotherapy (two cycles of cisplatin 50 mg/m2 given intravenously during radiotherapy, followed by four cycles of carboplatin AUC5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 given intravenously), by use of a biased coin minimisation procedure with stratification for participating centre, lymphadenectomy, stage, and histological type. The co-primary endpoints were overall survival and failure-free survival. Secondary endpoints of vaginal, pelvic, and distant recurrence were analysed according to the first site of recurrence. Survival endpoints were analysed by intention-to-treat, and adjusted for stratification factors. Competing risk methods were used for failure-free survival and recurrence. We did a post-hoc analysis to analyse patterns of recurrence with 1 additional year of follow-up. The study was closed on Dec 20, 2013; follow-up is ongoing. This study is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN14387080, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00411138.FINDINGS:Between Nov 23, 2006, and Dec 20, 2013, 686 women were enrolled, of whom 660 were eligible and evaluable (330 in the chemoradiotherapy group, and 330 in the radiotherapy-alone group). At a median follow-up of 72·6 months (IQR 59·9-85·6), 5-year overall survival was 81·4% (95% CI 77·2-85·8) with chemoradiotherapy versus 76·1% (71·6-80·9) with radiotherapy alone (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·70 [95% CI 0·51-0·97], p=0·034), and 5-year failure-free survival was 76·5% (95% CI 71·5-80·7) versus 69·1% (63·8-73·8; HR 0·70 [0·52-0·94], p=0·016). Distant metastases were the first site of recurrence in most patients with a relapse, occurring in 78 of 330 women (5-year probability 21·4%; 95% CI 17·3-26·3) in the chemoradiotherapy group versus 98 of 330 (5-year probability 29·1%; 24·4-34·3) in the radiotherapy-alone group (HR 0·74 [95% CI 0·55-0·99]; p=0·047). Isolated vaginal recurrence was the first site of recurrence in one patient (0·3%; 95% CI 0·0-2·1) in both groups (HR 0·99 [95% CI 0·06-15·90]; p=0·99), and isolated pelvic recurrence was the first site of recurrence in three women (0·9% [95% CI 0·3-2·8]) in the chemoradiotherapy group versus four (0·9% [95% CI 0·3-2·8]) in the radiotherapy-alone group (HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·17-3·33]; p=0·71). At 5 years, only one grade 4 adverse event (ileus or obstruction) was reported (in the chemoradiotherapy group). At 5 years, reported grade 3 adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups, occurring in 16 (8%) of 201 women in the chemoradiotherapy group versus ten (5%) of 187 in the radiotherapy-alone group (p=0·24). The most common grade 3 adverse event was hypertension (in four [2%] women in both groups). At 5 years, grade 2 or worse adverse events were reported in 76 (38%) of 201 women in the chemoradiotherapy group versus 43 (23%) of 187 in the radiotherapy-alone group (p=0·002). Sensory neuropathy persisted more often after chemoradiotherapy than after radiotherapy alone, with 5-year rates of grade 2 or worse neuropathy of 6% (13 of 201 women) versus 0% (0 of 187). No treatment-related deaths were reported.INTERPRETATION:This updated analysis shows significantly improved overall survival and failure-free survival with chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone. This treatment schedule should be discussed and recommended, especially for women with stage III or serous cancers, or both, as part of shared decision making between doctors and patients. Follow-up is ongoing to evaluate long-term survival.FUNDING:Dutch Cancer Society, Cancer Research UK, National Health and Medical Research Council, Project Grant, Cancer Australia Grant, Italian Medicines Agency, and the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute.

OBJECTIVES: To describe health service use, symptom and survival characteristics in metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) in order to outline usual care practices and identify future opportunities to improve the quality of care in this patient group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This population cohort study, conducted in Victoria, Australia, used 10 years (2000-2010) of linked hospital discharge, emergency visit, and death registration data, to track patients from their first inpatient admission with mPCa until death. Descriptive statistics on inpatient health service use, symptoms, procedures, survival, and place of death are presented. RESULTS: In all, 4436 patients survived a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 4 (1, 12) months from their first multiday admission with mPCa. They had a median (IQR) of 3 (1, 9) admissions, 1 (0, 2) emergency department presentation, and 35 (18, 63) days admitted to hospital. Lower urinary tract symptoms were common (50%), and 21% underwent lower urinary tract procedures, whilst 48% had blood product transfusions. In the last month of life, 3685 (83%) had at least one indicator of aggressive end-of-life care, including 48% with more than one acute hospital admission, and 55% staying ≥14 days. Hospital-based palliative care was accessed by 2657 (60%), occurring a median (IQR) of 30 (11, 74) days before death. In all, 23% died in the community, whilst 77% died in hospital, of whom 55% died in an acute hospital bed. CONCLUSION: Half of all decedents first admitted for a multiday stay with mPCa survived

Contains fulltext : 232064.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) PURPOSE: The survival results of the PORTEC-3 trial showed a significant improvement in both overall and failure-free survival with chemoradiation therapy versus pelvic radiation therapy alone. The present analysis was performed to compare long-term adverse events (AE) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS AND MATERIALS: In the study, 660 women with high-risk endometrial cancer were randomly assigned to receive chemoradiation therapy (2 concurrent cycles of cisplatin followed by 4 cycles of carboplatin/paclitaxel) or radiation therapy alone. Toxicity was graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. HRQOL was measured using EORTC QLQ-C30 and CX24/OV28 subscales and compared with normative data. An as-treated analysis was performed. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 74.6 months; 574 (87%) patients were evaluable for HRQOL. At 5 years, grade ≥2 AE were scored for 78 (38%) patients who had received chemoradiation therapy versus 46 (24%) who had received radiation therapy alone (P = .008). Grade 3 AE did not differ significantly between the groups (8% vs 5%, P = .18) at 5 years, and only one new late grade 4 toxicity had been reported. At 3 and 5 years, sensory neuropathy toxicity grade ≥2 persisted after chemoradiation therapy in 6% (vs 0% after radiation therapy, P < .001) and more patients reported significant tingling or numbness at HRQOL (27% vs 8%, P < .001 at 3 years; 24% vs 9%, P = .002 at 5 years). Up to 3 years, more patients who had chemoradiation therapy reported limb weakness (21% vs 5%, P < .001) and lower physical (79 vs 87, P < .001) and role functioning (78 vs 88, P < .001) scores. Both treatment groups reported similar long-term global health/quality of life scores, which were better than those of the normative population. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a long-lasting, clinically relevant, negative impact of chemoradiation therapy on toxicity and HRQOL, most importantly persistent peripheral sensory neuropathy. Physical and role functioning impairments were seen until 3 years. These long-term data are essential for patient information and shared decision-making regarding adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk endometrial cancer.

Background CUPISCO is an ongoing randomized phase II trial (NCT03498521) comparing molecularly guided therapy versus platinum‐based chemotherapy in patients newly diagnosed with “unfavorable” cancer of unknown primary (CUP). Materials and Methods Patients with an unfavorable CUP diagnosis, as defined by the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), and available cancer tissue for molecular sequencing are generally eligible. Potential patients with CUP entering screening undergo a review involving reference histopathology and clinical work‐up by a central eligibility review team (ERT). Patients with “favorable” CUP, a strongly suspected primary site of origin, lack of tissue, or unmet inclusion criteria are excluded. Results As of April 30, 2020, 628 patients had entered screening and 346 (55.1%) were screen failed. Screen fails were due to technical reasons (n = 89), failure to meet inclusion and exclusion criteria not directly related to CUP diagnosis (n = 89), and other reasons (n = 33). A total of 124 (35.8%) patients were excluded because unfavorable adeno‐ or poorly differentiated CUP could not be confirmed by the ERT. These cases were classified into three groups ineligible because of (a) histologic subtype, such as squamous and neuroendocrine, or favorable CUP; (b) evidence of a possible primary tumor; or (c) noncarcinoma histology. Conclusion Experience with CUPISCO has highlighted challenges with standardized screening in an international clinical trial and the difficulties in diagnosing unfavorable CUP. Reconfirmation of unfavorable CUP by an ERT in a clinical trial can result in many reasons for screen failures. By sharing this experience, we aim to foster understanding of diagnostic challenges and improve diagnostic pathology and clinical CUP algorithms. Implications for Practice A high unmet need exists for improved treatment of cancer of unknown primary (CUP); however, study in a trial setting is faced with the significant challenge of definitively distinguishing CUP from other cancer types. This article reports the authors' experience of this challenge so far in the ongoing CUPISCO trial, which compares treatments guided by patients’ unique genetic signatures versus standard chemotherapy. The data presented will aid future decision‐making regarding diagnosing true CUP cases; this will have far‐reaching implications in the design, execution, and interpretation of not only CUPISCO but also future clinical studies aiming to find much‐needed treatment strategies., Effective therapeutic regimens are lacking for patients with cancers of unknown primary (CUP). This article reports the clinic‐pathological challenges associated with diagnosis of unfavorable CUP in the CUPSICO trial and suggests refinements for diagnostic algorithms.

HER2 status has not been investigated in the context of the molecular endometrial cancer (EC) classification. Here, we aimed to determine the clinicopathological features and prognostic significance of the HER2 status in the molecularly classified PORTEC-3 trial population of patients with high-risk EC (HREC). HER2 testing was performed on tumor tissues of 407 molecularly classified HREC. HER2 status was determined by HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC, all cases) and subsequent HER2 dual in situ hybridization for cases with any (in) complete moderate to strong membranous HER2 IHC expression. The &Chi, 2 test and Spearman&rsquo, s Rho correlation coefficient were used to compare clinicopathological and molecular features. The Kaplan&ndash, Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models were used for survival analysis. We identified 24 (5.9%) HER2-positive EC of various histological subtypes including serous (n = 9, 37.5%), endometrioid (n = 6, 25.0%), and clear cell (n = 5, 20.8%). HER2 positivity was highly associated with the p53-abnormal subgroup (p53abn, 23/24 cases, p &lt, 0.0001). The correlation between p53abn and the HER2 status (&rho, = 0.438, 0.0001) was significantly stronger (p &lt, 0.0001) than between serous histology and the HER2 status (&rho, = 0.154, p = 0.002). HER2 status did not have independent prognostic value for survival after correction for the molecular classification. Our study strongly suggests that molecular subclass-directed HER2 testing is superior to histotype-directed testing. This insight will be relevant for future trials targeting HER2.

Objectives: To report clinician-perceived changes to cancer service delivery in response to COVID-19. Design: Multidisciplinary Australasian cancer clinician survey in collaboration with the European Society of Medical Oncology. Setting: Between May and June 2020 clinicians from 70 countries were surveyed; majority from Europe (n=196; 39%) with 1846 COVID-19 cases per million people, Australia (AUS)/New Zealand (NZ) (n=188; 38%) with 267/236 per million and Asia (n=75; 15%) with 121 per million at time of survey distribution. Participants Medical oncologists (n=372; 74%), radiation oncologists (n=91; 18%) and surgical oncologists (n=38; 8%). Results: Eighty-nine per cent of clinicians reported altering clinical practices; more commonly among those with versus without patients diagnosed with COVID-19 (n=142; 93% vs n=225; 86%, p=0.03) but regardless of community transmission levels (p=0.26). More European clinicians (n=111; 66.1%) had treated patients diagnosed with COVID-19 compared with Asia (n=20; 27.8%) and AUS/NZ (n=8; 4.8%), pConclusion: Clinicians reported widespread changes to oncology services, in regions of both high and low COVID-19 case numbers. Clinician concerns of potential negative impacts on patient outcomes warrant objective assessment, with system and policy implications for healthcare delivery at large.

Background Standard screening of endometrial cancer (EC) for Lynch syndrome (LS) is gaining traction; however, the prognostic impact of an underlying hereditary etiology is unknown. We established the prevalence, prognosis, and subsequent primary cancer incidence of patients with LS-associated EC in relation to sporadic mismatch repair deficient (MMRd)-EC in the large combined Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma-1, -2, and -3 trial cohort. Methods After MMR-immunohistochemistry, MLH1-promoter methylation testing, and next-generation sequencing, tumors were classified into 3 groups according to the molecular cause of their MMRd-EC. Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox model were used for survival analysis. Competing risk analysis was used to estimate the subsequent cancer probability. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results Among the 1336 ECs, 410 (30.7%) were MMRd. A total of 380 (92.7%) were fully triaged: 275 (72.4%) were MLH1-hypermethylated MMRd-ECs; 36 (9.5%) LS MMRd-ECs, and 69 (18.2%) MMRd-ECs due to other causes. Limiting screening of EC patients to 60 years or younger or to 70 years or younger would have resulted in missing 18 (50.0%) and 6 (16.7%) LS diagnoses, respectively. Five-year recurrence-free survival was 91.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 83.1% to 100%; hazard ratio = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.16 to 1.24, P = .12) for LS, 95.5% (95% CI = 90.7% to 100%; hazard ratio = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.05 to 0.55, P = .003) for “other” vs 78.6% (95% CI = 73.8% to 83.7%) for MLH1-hypermethylated MMRd-EC. The probability of subsequent LS-associated cancer at 10 years was 11.6% (95% CI = 0.0% to 24.7%), 1.5% (95% CI = 0.0% to 4.3%), and 7.0% (95% CI = 3.0% to 10.9%) within the LS, “other,” and MLH1-hypermethylated MMRd-EC groups, respectively. Conclusions The LS prevalence in the Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma trial population was 2.8% and among MMRd-ECs was 9.5%. Patients with LS-associated ECs showed a trend towards better recurrence-free survival and higher risk for second cancers compared with patients with MLH1-hypermethylated MMRd-EC.

Background The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of intraperitoneal bevacizumab (IP-bev) in delaying re-accumulation of malignant ascites in women with chemotherapy-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (CR-EOC) who have ceased chemotherapy. Secondary outcomes were safety and quality of life. Methods Women with CR-EOC and malignant ascites that reaccumulated within 28 days of their last paracentesis (P-1) were administered IP-bev 5 mg/kg following their first therapeutic paracentesis on study (P0). Additional doses of IP-bev were allowed at each subsequent paracentesis (P1, P2, etc) provided the interval from the last dose was 42 days or greater (median time from first to second therapeutic ascitic drainage). Results 24 participants (median age 67 years [range 38–86]; median 4.5 lines prior systemic treatment [range 1–12]; ECOG performance status of 0 in 1, 1 in 8, and 2–3 in 15) were recruited. The doses of IP-bev administered were 1 in 13 participants, 2 in 5, 3 in 2, 4 in 1, and 5 in 1. The proportion with a TTP of >42 days using competing risk analysis was 77% (95% CI 58–92). Median time from P0 to P1 or death was 48 days (range 8–248). Median paracentesis-free interval (P0–P1 or death) was 4.29-fold (95% CI 2.4–5.8) higher following a first dose of IP-bev compared with the time between paracenteses prior to study entry (P-1–P0). Conclusion IP-bev was safe, active, and warrants further study as a palliative intervention for recurrent ascites in CR-EOC patients receiving best supportive care.

Introduction PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have changed the management landscape for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). However, as with many targeted therapies, treatment resistance is common. The response to treatment post-PARPi has not been well described in trials. Data is needed to better understand disease course, and guide treatment decisions. The primary aim is to describe the treatment patterns post-PARPi. Secondary aims are to describe patient characteristics who received chemotherapy post-PARPi and DoR to chemotherapy. Methods Retrospective analysis of women with EOC treated with PARPi either in the maintenance or treatment setting and via government-funded or clinical trial access at six gynaecological oncology centres. Between 2007–2019 eligible women were identified via clinics, trial databases and pharmacy dispensing logs. Information regarding clinico-pathological characteristics and treatment outcomes were collated from medical records. Results Eighty-five women with EOC were identified. 90.6% received chemotherapy post-PARPi, with 72.7% receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. Clinicopathological characteristics in table 1. Best responses observed were 5.2% CR, 19.5% PR, 19.5% SD, and 55.8% PD. Median DOR was 7.0 months (range, 0.2 – 20.4 months) in 77 patients receiving chemotherapy post-PARPi. Eight patients did not receive further systemic therapy due to poor performance status. Women who received platinum doublet chemotherapy post-PARPi had a longer mPFS than those receiving platinum single agent or non-platinum chemotherapy (9.1 months vs 3.3 months vs 5.0 months, respectively p=0.0004). Conclusion Most patients received-platinum based chemotherapy post-PARPi with a modest response rate. Potential overlapping mechanisms of resistance to PARPi and platinum require further study to improve patient outcomes.

Introduction Here we aimed to evaluate the prevalence and prognosis of Lynch Syndrome (LS)-associated endometrial cancer (EC) in relation to sporadic mismatch repair deficient EC (MMRd-EC) in the combined PORTEC-1,-2 and 3 trials comprising 1336 ECs. Methods MMR-status was determined by MMR-immunohistochemistry (MLH1/PMS2/MSH6/MSH2). MMRd-ECs with detected promoter hypermethylation of MLH1 were classified as sporadic (methylated MMRd-EC). For unmethylated MMRd-EC cases tumor and normal tissue next-generation sequencing was performed. ECs with MMR germline mutations were classified as LS-associated (LS MMRd-EC). Unmethylated MMRd-ECs without MMR germline mutations were classified as MMRd-EC due to other causes (other MMRd-EC). Overall and recurrence-free survival were estimated and compared using Kaplan-Meier method and pairwise log-rank test. Results Among the 1336 ECs, 926 were MMR proficient. Of the 410 MMRd-EC, 376 could be fully triaged; 281 (75%) were methylated MMRd-ECs; 37 (10%) LS MMRd-ECs, and 58 (15%) other MMRd-ECs. The overall LS prevalence was 2.8%. Overall 5-year survival for LS MMRd-EC was 89% (95%CI 79–100%; p=0.055), other MMRd-EC 96% (92–100%; p=0.001), both compared to methylated MMRd-EC 79% (74–84%); 5-year recurrence-free survival was 92% (84–100%; p=0.123), 95% (89–100%; p=0.002), compared to 79% (74–84%), respectively. Conclusion The prevalence of LS in the PORTEC EC trial population was 3% and within the MMRd group 10%. LS MMRd-EC seems to have a better overall and recurrence-free survival than sporadic MMRd-EC caused by hypermethylation. Further research into the underlying causes of non-hypermethylated somatic MMRd-EC is ongoing.

Immunotherapy (IT) and targeted therapy (TT) have improved survival for some patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Their lived experience is under-studied. We conducted a single centre, qualitative study to understand concerns and unmet needs amongst this novel survivor population.Eligible participants had metastatic NSCLC, aged18, English-speaking and6 months post initiation of IT/TT without progressive disease. Semi-structured interviews focused on physical, psychological, social and functional impacts of diagnosis, therapy and prognosis. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed via qualitative thematic analysis.Between May and December 2019, 20 participants were interviewed: median age 62 (range 34-83), 13 (65%) female; median time since diagnosis of metastatic NSCLC 27 months (range 10-108). Twelve out of 20 (60%) participants had a targetable mutation (EGFR/ALK/BRAF); 6 were receiving IT, 11 TT, 2 IT + chemotherapy and 1 IT + TT. Four main themes were identified: living long-term on IT and TT (chronic toxicities), psychological concerns (living with uncertainty, fear of cancer progression, scan-related anxiety), support with practical issues (finances, employment amidst prognostic uncertainty, challenges with trial participation) and wanting information pertinent to NSCLC subtype.Longer-term survivors of metastatic NSCLC experience significant physical, psychological and functional concerns and unmet needs. Results will inform a broader cross-sectional survey and resources to address the needs of this growing survivor group.A 'one-size-fits-all' approach to NSCLC survivorship is no longer appropriate. Survivors of metastatic NSCLC treated with novel therapies may benefit from specific information regarding long-term toxicities and psychological supports.