Search

Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) often require inpatient palliative care (IPC). However, mounting evidence suggests age-related disparities in palliative care delivery. This study aimed to assess the cumulative incidence function (CIF) of IPC delivery, as well as the influence of age.The national ESME (Epidemio-Strategy-Medical-Economical)-MBC cohort includes consecutive MBC patients treated in 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centres. ICD-10 palliative care coding was used for IPC identification.Our analysis included 12,375 patients, 5093 (41.2%) of whom were aged 65 or over. The median follow-up was 41.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.5-42.5). The CIF of IPC was 10.3% (95% CI, 10.2-10.4) and 24.8% (95% CI, 24.7-24.8) at 2 and 8 years, respectively. At 2 years, among triple-negative patients, young patients (65 yo) had a higher CIF of IPC than older patients after adjusting for cancer characteristics, centre and period (65+/65: β = -0.05; 95% CI, -0.08 to -0.01). Among other tumour sub-types, older patients received short-term IPC more frequently than young patients (65+/65: β = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.03). At 8 years, outside large centres, IPC was delivered less frequently to older patients adjusted to cancer characteristics and period (65+/65: β = -0.03; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.01).We found a relatively low CIF of IPC and that age influenced IPC delivery. Young triple-negative and older non-triple-negative patients needed more short-term IPCs. Older patients diagnosed outside large centres received less long-term IPC. These findings highlight the need for a wider implementation of IPC facilities and for more age-specific interventions.

Background:\ud State-of-the art therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer suitable for platinum-based re-treatment includes bevacizumab-containing combinations (eg, bevacizumab combined with carboplatin–paclitaxel or carboplatin–gemcitabine) or the most active non-bevacizumab regimen: carboplatin–pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. The aim of this head-to-head trial was to compare a standard bevacizumab-containing regimen versus carboplatin–pegylated liposomal doxorubicin combined with bevacizumab.\ud Methods:\ud This multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, was done in 159 academic centres in Germany, France, Australia, Austria, and the UK. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) had histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube carcinoma with first disease recurrence more than 6 months after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2. Patients were stratified by platinum-free interval, residual tumour, previous antiangiogenic therapy, and study group language, and were centrally randomly assigned 1:1 using randomly permuted blocks of size two, four, or six to receive six intravenous cycles of bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, day 1) plus carboplatin (area under the concentration curve [AUC] 4, day 1) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m 2, days 1 and 8) every 3 weeks or six cycles of bevacizumab (10 mg/kg, days 1 and 15) plus carboplatin (AUC 5, day 1) plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (30 mg/m 2, day 1) every 4 weeks, both followed by maintenance bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks in both groups) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. There was no masking in this open-label trial. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Efficacy data were analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This completed study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01837251.\ud Findings:\ud Between Aug 1, 2013, and July 31, 2015, 682 eligible patients were enrolled, of whom 345 were randomly assigned to receive carboplatin–pegylated liposomal doxorubicin–bevacizumab (experimental group) and 337 were randomly assigned to receive carboplatin–gemcitabine–bevacizumab (standard group). Median follow-up for progression-free survival at data cutoff (July 10, 2018) was 12·4 months (IQR 8·3–21·7) in the experimental group and 11·3 months (8·0–18·4) in the standard group. Median progression-free survival was 13·3 months (95% CI 11·7–14·2) in the experimental group versus 11·6 months (11·0–12·7) in the standard group (hazard ratio 0·81, 95% CI 0·68–0·96; p=0·012). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hypertension (88 [27%] of 332 patients in the experimental group vs 67 [20%] of 329 patients in the standard group) and neutropenia (40 [12%] vs 73 [22%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 33 (10%) of 332 patients in the experimental group and 28 (9%) of 329 in the standard group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in one patient in the experimental group (

Aim Real-world data inform the outcome comparisons and help the development of new therapeutic strategies. To this end, we aimed to describe the full characteristics and outcomes in the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) cohort, a large national contemporary observational database of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods Women aged ≥18 years with newly diagnosed MBC and who initiated MBC treatment between January 2008 and December 2016 in one of the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers (N = 22,109) were included. We assessed the full patients’ characteristics, first-line treatments, overall survival (OS) and first-line progression-free survival, as well as updated prognostic factors in the whole cohort and among the 3 major subtypes: hormone receptor positive and HER2-negative (HR+/HER2−, n = 13,656), HER2-positive (HER2+, n = 4017) and triple-negative (n = 2963) tumours. Results The median OS of the whole cohort was 39.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 38.7–40.3). Five-year OS was 33.8%. OS differed significantly between the 3 subtypes (p Conclusions The ESME program represents a unique large-scale real-life cohort on MBC. This study highlights important situations of high medical need within MBC patients. Database registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT032753.

Background Both peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and implanted port catheters (PORTs) are used for adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) administration in patients with early breast cancer (EBC). We aimed to compare the safety between PICCs and PORTs in this setting. Patients and methods This monocentric phase II randomised trial (NCT02095743) included patients with EBC who were eligible for ACT. Patients with curative anticoagulation therapy were excluded. The primary objective was to identify which device has a lower probability of catheter-related significant adverse events (CR-SAEs) within the 35 weeks after device implantation. The secondary objective was to evaluate quality of life (QoL) and patient satisfaction. Results From February 2014 to May 2018, 256 patients were included, and 253 (99%) were analysed. Overall, 31 patients (12.2%) experienced CR-SAEs, which mainly included thromboembolic events. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the probability that a CR-SAE would occur was 7.8% (10 events) with PORTs versus 16.6% (21 events) with PICCs (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.2 [1.03–4.62], P = 0.036). In a per-protocol analysis, PICCs were also associated with a higher risk of CR-SAEs than PORTs (HR = 2.82 [1.26–6.25], P = 0.007). Regarding the secondary objectives, if there was no difference in QoL between the arms, then significantly more discomfort was reported among patients with PICCs than among patients with PORTs (P = 0.002 after implantation and P Conclusions CR-SAEs in patients with EBC are frequent but rarely impact the ACT process. Compared with PORTs, PICCs are associated with a significantly higher risk of CR-SAEs and more discomfort. PORTs should be preferred for ACT administration in patients with EBC.

Purpose Genomic tests can identify ER-positive HER2-negative localized breast cancer patients who may not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Such tests seem especially interesting in “intermediate” clinico-pathological risk categories. The psychological impact of the decision uncertainty in these women remains largely unexplored. We assessed the clinical and psychological impact of EndoPredict® (EpClin), a clinico-genomic test, in these patients. Methods This multicenter, single arm prospective study (NCT02773004) enrolled patients for which adjuvant chemotherapy was uncertain, based on predefined criteria. The primary endpoint was the proportion of change between initial adjuvant decision and final administration of chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints included post-test (Day 17) and 1-year patient reported outcomes. Results One third of 200 evaluable patients had a high EpClin score (≥3.32867; 10 years cumulative risk of distance failure ≥10%). The overall change rate of chemotherapy decision was 72/200 (35.8%, 95% CI 29.2–42.4). Chemotherapy was withdrawn in 57 cases (28.4% [22.2–34.8]) and added in 15 (7.5% [3.8–11.2]. 6 changes (8%) were based on patients’ decisions. Anxiety and distress levels increased at Day 17 when adding chemotherapy after the test result (p, Highlights • EndoPredict ® (EpClin) allowed a chemotherapy decision modification in 35% of the patients included in the Adendom trial. • Patient-physician concertation is important: 8% of treatment changes are based on patients’ will. • A single-step decision including the test appears preferable to limit anxiety and distress.

The aims of the present study were to describe treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with central nervous system metastases (CNSM) selected among metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients included in a retrospective study from the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) MBC cohort.Neurological progression-free survival (NPFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Significant contributors to NPFS were determined using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.After a median follow-up of 42.8 months, of 16 701 patients included in the ESME MBC database, CNSM were diagnosed in 24.6% of patients. The most frequent treatments after diagnosis of CNSM were whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) (45.2%) and systemic treatment (59.3%). Median OS and NPFS were 7.9 months (95% CI: 7.2-8.4) and 5.5 months (95% CI: 5.2-5.8), respectively. In multivariate analysis, age70 years (vs50 years; HR = 1.40; 95% CI: 1.24-1.57), triple-negative tumours (vs HER2-/HR+; HR = 1.87; 95% CI: 1.71-2.06), HER2+/HR-tumours (vs HER2-/HR+; HR = 1.14; 95% CI: 1.02-1.27), ≥3 metastatic sites (vs 3; HR = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.21-1.43) and ≥3 previous treatment lines (vs 3; HR = 1.75; 95% CI: 1.56-1.96) were detrimental for NPFS. A time interval between selection and CNSM diagnosis superior to 18 months (vs9 months; HR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.78-0.98) was associated with longer NPFS.This study describes current treatment patterns of MBC patients in a "real life" setting. Despite advances in stereotactic radiation therapy, most of the patients still received WBRT. More research is warranted to identify patient subsets for tailored treatment strategies.

Background: Platinum-based chemotherapy regimens (PtCT) have been shown to increase treatment efficacy when combined to neoadjuvant standard of care treatment of triple negative breast cancers (TNBC). In the metastatic breast cancer (MBC) setting, preclinical and clinical data suggest that PtCT could be more efficient than non-platinum based ones (non-PtCT) among patients (pts) with germline BRCA1/2 mutations (gBRCAm). However, published data remain controversial on this topic, particularly for MBC. We evaluated the progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) under first-line PtCT and non-PtCT among gBRCAm carriers in ESME, a nationwide real-life MBC database. Methods: ESME MBC database (NCT03275311), is a unique national cohort of all consecutive pts who initiated a first-line treatment for MBC between 2008 and 2016 in one of the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers. Women with HER2- MBC and known hormone receptors (HR) and gBRCA1/2 (before or in the 6 first months of metastatic disease, gBRCAm / wild type / not tested) status, who received a first-line MBC CT were selected. Patients with other germinal mutations were considered as wild type. Primary objectives were OS and PFS under first-line CT (PtCT vs. non-PtCT) in the TNBC gBRCA1/2m population.Secondary objectives were OS and PFS during first-line CT (PtCT vs. non-PtCT) in the TNBC wild-type and “not tested” population, as well as among the HR+/HER2- pts.To avoid guarantee time bias related to oncogenetic testing, analyses were performed at baseline (CT initiation) and different landmark time points (3-month or 6-month after CT initiation). Thus, BRCA status was defined according to oncogenetic testings performed before the landmark time, and patients who progressed or censored before the landmark time were excluded. Results: 10,164 pts (2,794 TNBC; 7,370 HR+/HER2-) were included in this analysis. Pts who received PtCT were significantly younger, affected by a gBRCA1/2m, had a high histological grade and/or TNBC tumor, with more frequent visceral and central nervous system spreading than non PtCT ones. Median follow-up was 51.1 months [95%CI 49.6; 52.6]. All reported results were based on the gBRCA status defined at CT initiation and on multivariable analysis adjusted on age at MBC diagnosis, de novo MBC status, type and number of metastases. In the gBRCA1/2m TNBC population (N=132), PtCT was independently associated with a better PFS compared to non-PtCT (HR=0.56, 95%CI 0.38-0.84, p=0.005), without significant difference in OS (HR=0.79, 95%CI 0.51-1.23, p=0.29).No difference was seen in wild-type BRCA1/2 TNBC pts (N=269) according to the CT regimen, while, in the larger population of untested TNBC (N=2,393), PtCT was associated with worse OS (HR=1.18, 95%CI 1.03-1.34, p=0.016) compared to non-PtCT regimens, without significant difference in PFS (HR=1.07, 95%CI 0.95-1.22, p=0.26). No significant difference was seen regarding PFS nor OS in gBRCA1/2m HR+/HER2- pts (N=124) and in the wild-type BRCA1/2 HR+/HER2- population.However, in the larger population of untested HR+/HER2- pts (N=6,836), PtCT was independently associated with worse OS (HR=2.15, 95%CI 1.79-2.59, p Citation Format: William Jacot, Amélie Lusque, Audrey Mailliez, Thibault De la Motte Rouge, Luc Cabel, Christelle Levy, Anne Patsouris, Isabelle Desmoulins, Lionel Uwer, Marianne Leheurteur, Mathieu Robain, Olivier Caron, Thomas Bachelot, Thomas Filleron, Jean-Sébastien Frenel, Suzette Delaloge. Efficacy of Platinum-based first-line chemotherapy among metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients according to the germline BRCA1/2 mutational status: An analysis of the French ESME MBC database [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-11.

The impact of chemotherapy on fertility appears to be of essential importance for the youngest cancer survivors. The aim of this study was to assess plasma anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) evolution, using an automated sensitive AMH immunoassay in women younger than 35 years old before and after treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer. We selected 54 women aged less than 35 years old, at the time of breast cancer diagnosis, who received chemotherapy between 2008 and 2014, and with plasma samples collected from the diagnosis, to 1 year, 3 years and 5 years post-diagnosis. The median AMH decreased markedly in the year after the diagnosis compared with the pretreatment values (P < 0.0001), and slightly increased 2 years later (P = 0.007, comparing 1-year and 3-years post-diagnosis concentrations), without any additional AMH recovery 5 years after diagnosis. This recovery did not reach age-dependent AMH expected values (P < 0.0001, comparing AMH measured values to AMH expected values). Addition of taxanes to an anthracyclines + alkylating-based regimen was associated with a worse AMH decrease (P = 0.007). Ovarian tissue cryopreservation before treatment did not influence the AMH recovery. These results highlight the necessity of fertility counselling before treatment, especially in women wanting children.

Background: Genomic tests can identify ER-positive Her2-negative localized breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) who may not drive any benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). Several genomic tests have reached a high level of analytical and clinical validity, as well as clinical utility in such situation. Recent results suggest that the safe de–escalation of adjuvant chemotherapy may be most beneficial in pts with clinical high or indetermediate risk, as assessed by classical variables or online tools, through the use of a genomic test. The clinical risk though remains quite uncertain with variable definition and grey zones. The present study aimed at determining if EPclin clinico-genomic test had a significant impact on treatment decision making among pts with predefined intermediate /borderline clinical risk. Patients and methods: Women were eligible for the present study if they had complete surgical removal of a localized ER+ Her2- pN0 or pN1mi BC, and were considered by the multidisciplinary team meeting (MTM) of the center as being in a "grey zone" of uncertain CT benefit based on classical clinic-pathological assessment. The MTM1 proposed a decision (chemo/no chemo). After informed consent, an EPclin signature classified the tumor as low risk (EPclin Score < 3.3, no chemo advised) or high risk (> 3.3, a theoretical indication for adjuvant chemo). Primary end point was the proportion of change between initial adjuvant CT decision at MTM1 and final administration of CT (yes/no). A 5 steps Fleming design was planned, considering that a change rate of 15% or less was not acceptable (low clinical utility). A one-step design was used (unilateral α = 2.5% and β = 1%). Results: 203 pts were included, of whom 198 are evaluable for the main end point. 74% of the tumors were grade 2, 72% T1 , 25% T2, 3% T3; 16% were pN1mi and 84% pN0. Median age was 57. EpClin® was low risk in 67% and high risk in 33% of the cases. The global rate of decision change between MTM1 and final administration of CT was 70/198 (35.4% IC-95% = [28.7-42.1]), with 55 (27.7%) decreases and 15 (7.6%) increases in CT indication. 27% instead of 47% of all pts finally received CT (43% decrease in CT prescription). In the multivariate analysis, the factors associated to decrease for less CT were EPclin score (OR 0.11 [0.03-0.35]), proliferation (OR 1.08 [1.03-1.13]) and higher grades (OR 5.22 [1.04-26.08]); while EPclin score was positively (OR 76.6 [7.11-824.8]), but higher grades inversely (OR 0.06 [0-0.86]) associated to an increase in CT administration. Of note, the change in final decision occurred after the MTM2 and after report of the results and discussion with the patient in 9 of the 70 cases (12% of changes; 4.5% of the whole population)(8 decreases and 1 increase in CT administration). Conclusion: Adendom met its primary objective, with 35% of intermediate clinico-pathological risk pts getting significant therapeutic changes upon the receipt of an EPclin gene expression profile. 43% of these "intermediate risk" pts planned for CT avoided it. 12% of the changes were discrepant with the test's results and occurred after discussion with the patient. Citation Format: Penault-Llorca F, Kwiatkovski F, Grenier J, Levy C, Leheurteur M, Uwer L, Derbel O, Le Rol A, Jacquin J-P, Jouannaud C, Quenel-Tueux N, Girre V, Foa C, Guardiola E, Lortholary A, Catala S, Lemonnier J, Delaloge S. UCBG 2-14: A prospective multicenter non-randomized trial evaluating the effect of EndoPredict® (EPclin®) clinico-genomic test on treatment decision making among patients with intermediate clinical risk [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-05-10.

For luminal metastatic breast cancer (MBC), endocrine therapy (ET) is the recommended initial treatment before chemotherapy. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of multiple ET lines in a real-life study.The Breast Cancer Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) project analysed data from all patients with systemic treatment for MBC initiated between 2008 and 2014 in one of the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centres. The primary end-point was the successive progression-free survival (PFS) evaluation.The ESME research programme included 9921 patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative (HER2-) MBC. Before any chemotherapy, 4195 (43.4%), 1252 (29.8%) and 279 (6.6%) patients received one, two or three ET ± targeted therapy, respectively. The median PFS for first-, second- and third-line ET ± targeted therapy was 11.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.8-12.1), 5.8 (95% CI, 5.3-6.1) and 5.5 (95% CI, 4.6-6.3) months, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, time from diagnosis to metastatic recurrence (P 0.0001), presence of symptoms at metastatic relapse (P = 0.01), number of metastatic sites (P = 0.0003) and their localisation (P 0.0001) were prognostic factors for PFS1. Duration of previous PFS was the only prognostic factor for subsequent PFS (10% threshold). Ten percent of the patients showed long-term response to ET, with a total treatment duration before chemotherapy ≥43.6 months.Median PFS in our HR+/HER2- real-life cohort is similar to median first-line PFS reported in clinical trials, regardless of ET used as second- and third-line treatment. Despite the international consensus on early initiation of ET, the latter is not prescribed in most of the cases. Patients with a low tumour burden may achieve prolonged response on ET.

12123 Background: Sudden COVID-19 pandemic has enforced social restrictions across the globe, including social distancing, curfews and total lockdowns, which persist in many parts of the world. Beyond these measures, cancer patients have faced up to the threat of the risk of severe COVID-19 infections and the adaptations of medical oncology practices, with potential impact on their psychological well-being. We aimed to follow Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms and other Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) over this period among cancer patients from the French COVIPACT study. Methods: The COVIPACT study (NCT04366154) included patients with solid/hematologic malignancy receiving medical treatment during the first lockdown in outpatient departments of two cancer centers. Patients were asked to fulfill validated questionnaires on PTSD symptoms (IES-R), insomnia (ISI), quality of life (FACT-G) and cognition (FACT-Cog) at baseline (M0, first lockdown, Apr/May 2020), 3 months (M3, post-lockdown, Jul/Aug 2020) and 6 months (M6, second lockdown, Oct/Nov 2020). PTSD was defined as an IES-R score ≥33 and moderate/severe insomnia as an ISI score ≥15. Higher values on the FACT-G (range 0-108) and FACT-Cog (PCI subscale range 0-72) indicated better quality of life and cognition, respectively. Changes in PROs over time were assessed using mixed models for repeated measures. Results: Among the 734 patients included in COVIPACT, 579, 347 and 328 completed the questionnaires at M0, M3 and M6, respectively: median age, 64 years, 72% women, 59% metastatic status. Patients were mostly treated for breast (44%), lung, head and neck (20%), digestive (16%) and gynecologic cancers (11%). We observed a J-shaped evolution of PTSD over time, affecting 21.2% of patients during the first lockdown, 13.6% the post-lockdown and 23.6% during the second lockdown (p for time < 0.001). Moreover, patients reported linear deterioration of cognitive function over follow-up (p < 0.001). No change was observed in any dimension of quality of life (p for time = 0.06). 24.3%, 27.1% and 28.1% of the patients reported insomnia at M0,M3 and M6 (p for time = 0.35). At each time, PTSD was associated with more insomnia, worst quality of life and cognitive complain. At all the times, ≥50% of patients with PTSD reported insomnia compared to ≤23% in non-PTSD patients (p < 0.001). In addition, there was a clinically significant difference of ≥16 points on the FACT-G and ≥8 points on the FACT-Cog PCI between PTSD and non-PTSD patients (p < 0.001) at the all times. Conclusions: More than 20% of patients have developed PTSD during the different periods of lockdown, with strong association with poor quality of life, cognitive complain and insomnia. Psychosocial support promoting emotional resilience should be largely offered to cancer patients to prevent and/or reduce PTSD. Clinical trial information: NCT04366154.

1054 Background: PIK3CA mutations, present in ̃40% of HR+, HER2– ABC, are associated with therapeutic resistance and shorter survival. Alpelisib (ALP) + fulvestrant (FUL) demonstrated efficacy in this population for which achieving long-term (LT) disease control is challenging. Here, we report on pts with HR+, PIK3CA-altered ABC who achieved LT disease control with ALP + FUL. Methods: SOLAR-1 was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study of ALP (or placebo) + FUL in HR+, HER2– ABC that progressed on/after an aromatase inhibitor. CBYL719X2101 (X2101) was a phase 1, open-label study of escalating ALP doses ± FUL in advanced solid tumors that progressed on/after anti-estrogen therapy (ET) or relapsed after adjuvant anti-ET. A cut-off ≥ median (progression-free survival [PFS] + 2 SE) was chosen based on Kaplan-Meier curves from SOLAR-1 to define LT disease control as PFS (SOLAR-1) or time on treatment (X2101) ≥18 mo. Results: In SOLAR-1, 51 of 169 pts (30.2%) randomized to ALP + FUL achieved LT disease control with a median PFS of 33.5 mo (95% CI, 27.4 mo-not reached). Baseline characteristics of pts in SOLAR-1 are in the table below. In pts with LT disease control, adverse events (AEs) of special interest (combined preferred terms) of GI toxicity were observed in 47 pts (92.2%; grade ≥3: 11.8%, n=6), of hyperglycemia in 41 pts (80.4%; grade ≥3: 39.2%, n=20), and of rash in 28 pts (54.9%; grade ≥3: 19.6%, n=10). Median ALP relative dose intensity was 79.9% and 82.1% for pts with LT disease control (n=51) and the overall population (n=168), respectively. In X2101, 7 of 52 pts (13.5%) with ABC who received ALP+FUL achieved LT disease control up to 47.8 mo. Conclusions: In this subset of pts with hard-to-treat, endocrine-resistant disease, LT disease control ≥18 mo is meaningful considering median PFS of 4.6-9.3 mo or 9.5-16.4 mo with FUL alone or with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, respectively. Here, LT disease control was observed in 2 studies of HR+, PIK3CA-altered ABC, including in pts with poor prognosis, diabetes/pre-diabetes at baseline, and heavy pre-treatment. AE profile was consistent with prior reports and did not preclude LT disease control. Further work is needed to better understand factors influencing LT disease control. Clinical trial information: NCT01219699, NCT02437318 .[Table: see text]

5500 Background: To investigate whether adding Pembrolizumab (P) to neoadjuvant carboplatin-paclitaxel chemotherapy (CP) may increase the optimal debulking rate, assessed by Complete Resection Rate (CRR) after Interval Debulking Surgery (IDS) in patients (pts) with initially unresectable International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC/IV ovarian, tubal or peritoneal HGSC. Methods: Multicenter, open-label, non-comparative randomized phase II trial. Pts were randomized (2:1) to receive 4 cycles of CP ± P before IDS. After IDS, all patients received post-operative chemotherapy (2 to 4 cycles) and optional bevacizumab for 15 months in total ± P as maintenance therapy for up to 2 years. Randomization was stratified on center, FIGO stage, Bev planned after IDS and disease volume (5cm). Primary endpoint was the centrally reviewed CRR at IDS. 60 pts were planned in the CP+P arm (A'Hern's single-stage design P0=50%, P1=70%). Safety (particularly due to P addition), surgical morbidity, ORR, PFS and OS were secondary endpoints. Results: 91 pts were randomized from 02/18 to 04/19 with a median Peritoneal Cancer Index at 24 (range 7-39). 80 pts (88%) received Bev in combination with CP followed by bev ± P in maintenance. In the CP+P group (n=61), 58 (95%) pts had IDS and 78% achieved complete resection. The CRR in this group was 74%, statistically superior to the pre-defined hypothesis. In the CP group, CRR was 70% (29/30 pts underwent IDS). Complete resection after strictly 4 cycles of CP±P was obtained for 41 pts (71%) and 17 (58%) pts in CP+P and CP group, respectively (sensitivity analysis). For CP+P group, numerically higher ORRs were observed before IDS compared to CP group (76% vs 61%). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AE) occurred in 75% of the CP+P group and 67% in the CP group: mainly blood and lymphatic, gastrointestinal and vascular disorders. Postoperative AE (mainly infectious, vascular and gastrointestinal) occurred in 20% and 13% of the pts in CP+P and CP arm, respectively. No difference in the number of fatal events between the two arms: 2 in the experimental arm vs 1 in the control arm. Progression free survival rate at 18 months was 61% (95CI% [47-73]) and 57% (95CI% [37-72]) in CP+P and CP arm, respectively. Conclusions: P may be safely added to preoperative treatment in pts deemed non-optimally resectable. The primary objective was met with an improved CRR on CP+P arm. The CRR in the control group was higher than expected. Survival data and translational research including PDL1 status are ongoing to better define P as treatment option in this setting. Clinical trial information: 2016-004-163-39. Clinical trial information: NCT03275506.

2527 Background: Isolated central nervous system (CNS) progression on first-line systemic therapy with Trastuzumab (T) and Pertuzumab (P) for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a therapeutic challenge. Our aim was to describe the clinical outcome and current treatment strategies for such patients in a large retrospective cohort. Methods: Patients (pts) were selected among all MBC pts included in the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) database involving 18 specialized cancer centers (NCT03275311). CNS progression-free survival (CNS-PFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from diagnostic of brain metastases (BM) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Between January 2008 and December 2016, 995 pts were treated with first-line T and P for their HER2-positive MBC. They were 55 years old in median, with tumors expressing hormone-receptors in 62%. A total of 132 pts (13%) experienced isolated CNS progression on T and P, with a median time from metastatic diagnosis to CNS progression of 12 months. It was the first CNS progression for 108 pts (82%) while 24 (18%) already had BM at time of metastatic relapse. After CNS progression, T and P were continued for 58% of pts (n = 73). The remaining 47 pts were switched to another HER2-directed therapy (T-DM1 for 57%, T alone or combined with chemotherapy for 36% and lapatinib for 21%). Among those 132 pts, 37% received whole-brain radiotherapy, 18% stereotactic radiation therapy, and 11% surgery. Systemic treatment was combined with CNS-directed therapy for 50% of pts. Median follow-up is 21 months (95%CI: 14.9-25.5) from the diagnosis of CNS metastases. Median OS (mOS) of the 132 pts is 35 months (95%CI: 29.2-53,6), and median PFS 7 months (95%CI: 6.3- 9.2). A total of 77 pts (58.3%) experienced a new CNS progression with a median CNS-PFS of 9 months (95%CI: 7.6-12,0). Patient who stayed on T and P had a significantly better OS in comparison to pts who were switched to another systemic HER2-directed therapy (mOS not evaluable vs23 months), whereas PFS and CNS-PFS were similar between groups. Conclusions: In this real life setting, isolated CNS progression occurred among 13% of pts with HER2+ MBC on first-line treatment with T and P, after a median time of 12 months. Following current ASCO recommendations, continuation of T and P after CNS-directed therapy, seemed to be adequate. Nevertheless, time to subsequent progression is short and better therapeutic options are needed.

Background and Aims: Because of its low prevalence, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in males is managed based on clinical experience with women. Using a real-life database, we aim to provide a comprehensive analysis of male MBC characteristics, management and outcome. Methods: The Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics Data Platform collected data for all men and women ⩾18 years with MBC in 18 participating French Comprehensive Cancer Centers from January 2008 to November 2016. Demographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics were retrieved, as was treatment modality. Men were matched 1:1 to women with similar characteristics. Results: Of 16,701 evaluable patients, 149 (0.89%) men were identified. These men were older (median age 69 years) and predominantly had hormone receptor HR+/HER2– disease (78.3%). Median overall survival (OS) was 41.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI: 26.9–49.7)] and similar to women. Median progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line therapy was 9.3 months [95% CI (7.4–11.5)]. In the HR+/HER2– subpopulation, endocrine therapy (ET) alone was the frontline treatment for 43% of patients, including antiestrogens ( n = 19), aromatase inhibitors ( n = 15) with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogs ( n = 3), and various sequential treatments. Median PFS achieved by frontline ET alone was similar in men [9.8 months, 95% CI (6.9–17.4)] and in women [13 months, 95% CI (8.4–30.9)] ( p = 0.80). PFS was similar for HR+/HER2– men receiving upfront ET or chemotherapy: 9.8 months [95% CI (6.9–17.4)] versus 9.5 months [95% CI (7.4–11.7)] ( p = 0.22), respectively. Conclusion: MBC management in men and women leads to similar outcomes, especially in HR+/HER2– patients for whom ET should also be a cornerstone. Unsolved questions remain and successfully recruiting trials for men are still lacking.

HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a common setting in which chemotherapy could be effective even in later lines of treatment. Oral etoposide has demonstrated clinical activity in this setting in small-scale studies, but its efficacy has not been compared to that of other chemotherapy regimens. We used the ESME database (Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics), a real-life national French multicentre cohort of MBC patients initiating therapy between 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2014. HER2-negative MBC patients who received oral etoposide as > 3rd chemotherapy line and for more than 14 days were included. Primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary objectives were overall survival (OS), and propensity-score matched Cox models including comparison with other therapies in the same setting. Three hundred forty-five out of 16,702 patients received oral etoposide and 222 were eligible. Median PFS was 3.2 months [95% CI 2.8–4] and median OS 7.3 months [95% CI 5.7–10.3]. Median PFS did not significantly differ according to the therapeutic line. The only prognostic factor for both PFS and OS was the MBC phenotype (hormone receptor-positive versus triple-negative, HR = 0.71 [95% CI 0.52–0.97], p = 0.028 for PFS and HR = 0.65 [0.46–0.92], p = 0.014 for OS). After matching for the propensity score, no differential effect on PFS or OS was observed between oral etoposide and other chemotherapy regimens administered in the same setting (HR = 0.94 [95% CI 0.77–1.15], p = 0.55 for PFS and HR = 1.10 [95% CI 0.88–1.37], p = 0.40 for OS). Oral etoposide retains some efficacy in selected heavily pre-treated patients with HER2-negative MBC, with the advantages of oral administration.

Real-life analysis of overall survival (OS) trends among metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients may help define medical needs and evaluate the impact of public health investments. The present study aimed to evaluate the independent impact of the year of MBC diagnosis on OS in the Epidemio-Strategy-Medical-Economical (ESME)-MBC cohort.ESME-MBC (NCT03275311) is a French, national, multicentre, observational cohort including 16,702 consecutive newly diagnosed MBC patients (01 January 2008-31 December 2014). Of 16,680 eligible patients, 15,085 had full immunohistochemistry data, allowing classification as hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-, N = 9907), HER2-positive (HER2+, N = 2861) or triple-negative (HR-/HER2-, N = 2317) subcohorts. Multivariate analyses of OS were conducted among the full ESME cohort and subcohorts.Median OS of the whole cohort was 37.22 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.3-38.04). Year of diagnosis was an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-1.00], P = .01) together with age, subtype, disease-free interval, visceral metastases and number of organs involved. Median OS of HR+/HER2-, HER2+ and HR-/HER2- subcohorts was, respectively, 42.12 (95% CI, 40.90-43.10), 44.91 (95% CI, 42.51-47.90) and 14.52 (95% CI, 13.70-15.24) months. Year of diagnosis was a strong independent predictor of OS in HER2+ subcohort (hazard ratio 0.91 [95% CI, 0.88-0.94], P .001), but not in HR+/HER2- nor HR-/HER2- subcohorts (hazard ratio 1.00 [95% CI, 0.98-1.01], P = .80 and 1.00 [95% CI, 0.97-1.02], P = .90, respectively).The OS of MBC patients has slightly improved over the past decade. However, this effect is confined to HER2+ cases, highlighting the need of new strategies in the other subtypes.

Acquired estrogen receptor gene (ESR1) mutations have been recently reported as a marker of resistance to aromatase inhibitors in hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer. We retrospectively considered seven patients treated for metastatic breast cancer with available samples from the primary tumor before any treatment, cryopreserved metastasis removed during progression and concomitant plasmas. All these seven patients were in disease progression after previous exposure to aromatase inhibitors for at least 6 months, and were assessed for ESR1 mutations detection in tumor and circulating DNA. For these patients, Sanger sequencing identified four metastases with clear ESR1 mutation and one possible, whereas digital PCR identified six mutated metastases. Then, under blind conditions and using digital PCR, corresponding circulating ESR1 mutations were successfully detected in four of these six metastatic breast cancer patients. Moreover, in two patients with serial blood samples following treatments exposure, the monitoring of circulating ESR1 mutations clearly predicted disease evolution. In the context of high interest for ESR1 mutations, our results highlight that these acquired recurrent mutations may be tracked in circulating tumor DNA and may be of clinical relevance for metastatic breast cancer patient monitoring.

Background Brain metastases (BMs) are associated with a poor prognosis. Standard treatment comprises whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). As neo-angiogenesis is crucial in BM growth, combining angiogenesis inhibitors such as bevacizumab with radiotherapy is of interest. We aimed to identify the optimal regimen of bevacizumab combined with WBRT for BM for phase II evaluation and provide preliminary efficacy data. Patients and methods In this multicentre single-arm phase I study with a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, patients with unresectable BM from solid tumours received three cycles of bevacizumab at escalating doses [5, 10 and 15 mg/kg every 2 weeks at dose levels (DL) 0, 1 and 2, respectively] and WBRT (30 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks) administered from day 15. DL3 consisted of bevacizumab 15 mg/kg with WBRT from day 15 in 30 Gy/10 fractions/2 weeks. Safety was evaluated using NCI-CTCAE version 3. BM response (RECIST 1.1) was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging at 6 weeks and 3 months after WBRT. Results Nineteen patients were treated, of whom 13 had breast cancer. There were no DLTs. Grade 1–2 in-field and out-field toxicities occurred for five and nine patients across all DLs, respectively, including three and six patients (including one patient with both, so eight patients overall) of nine patients in DL3. One patient experienced BM progression during treatment (DL0). At the 3-month post-treatment assessment, 10 patients showed a BM response: one of three treated at DL0, one of three at DL1, two of three at DL2 and six of seven at DL3, including one complete response. BM progression occurred in five patients, resulting in two deaths. The remaining patient died from extracranial disease progression. Conclusion Bevacizumab combined with WBRT appears to be a tolerable treatment of BM. DL3 warrants further efficacy evaluation based on the favourable safety/efficacy balance. Clinical trials.gov Identifier NCT01332929.

Background Both peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) and implanted port catheters (PORT) are used for adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) administration in early breast cancer (EBC) patients. We evaluated the safety of the two devices in ACT setting. Methods This monocentric phase II randomized trial (NCT02095743) included patients with an EBC and eligible to an ACT. Patients with curative anticoagulation were excluded. The primary endpoint was to identify the device with the less probability of occurrence of a significant adverse event related to the central venous device (SAERCVD) during the 37 weeks following device implantation. A SAERCVD was defined as: CTCAE grade ≥3, inducing a delay in CT administration >7 days, or requiring a replacement of the implanted device. PICC were removed the day of last CT administration; PORT were removed within 4 weeks after the last CT administration. Based on our previous study (Support Care Cancer. 2016; 24(3):1397-403), 256 patients were needed to meet the primary endpoint. Results From February 2014 to April 2018, 256 patients were included; 248 (97%) were analyzed (PICC, n = 125; PORT, n = 123). Overall, 25 patients (10%) had a SAERCVD: thrombosis (n = 13), local infection (n = 6), systemic infection (n = 3) and mechanical complication (n = 3). Probability of occurrence of a SAERCVD within 37 weeks was 4.9% (6 SAERCVD) in PORT vs 15.2% (19 SAERCVD) in PICC (HR = 3.2 [1.3-8.1], p = 0.007). Regarding baseline characteristics, patients experiencing a SAERCVD had a trend toward a higher body mass index (p = 0.08) and a history of thrombo-embolic disease (p = 0.08) compared to patients without SAERCVD. Among the 223 patients without SAERCVD, probability of occurrence of a non-significant adverse event related to the device was 20.8% (22/106) in PICC vs 17.1% (20/117) in PORT (HR = 1.2 [0.7-2.2], p = 0.5), mainly grade 1 local pruritus. Grade≥3 adverse events not related to the implanted device were observed for 48 patients in each group (HR = 1 [0.7-1.5], p = 0.9), mainly CT induced neutropenia. Conclusions Although side effects related to central venous devices are rare during ACT in EBC patients, SAERCVD are more frequently observed with PICC rather than PORT. Clinical trial identification 2012-A01440-43 NCT02095743. Legal entity responsible for the study Florian Clatot. Funding La Ligue contre le cancer. Disclosure F. Clatot: Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Lilly; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

e12534 Background: Circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA), CA 15.3 and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have been associated with survival in MBC. These 3 biomarkers have never been compared. Methods: We retrospectively included all patients treated in our center between 2010 and 2012 for a HR+ MBC, who had clinical progression during the first line of aromatase inhibitor (AI) and available plasma samples. CfDNA level (ng/mL), CA 15.3 level (U/mL) and ESR1 circulating mutation level (Y537N, Y537S, Y537C and D538G, identified by ddPCR) were determined at time of clinical progression (Tp) and 3 months before (Tp-3). Biomarkers values at Tp and Tp-3 as well as their variations were analyzed according to clinical progression and overall survival (OS). Results: 91 patients were analyzed. CA 15.3 was elevated ( > 30 U/mL) in 71/91 (78%) at Tp and 62/91 (68%) at Tp-3. Higher CA 15.3 was associated with worse OS, especially at Tp (HR = 1.0006/unit at both times, p = 0.009 at Tp; p = 0.08 at Tp-3). Higher cfDNA was associated with worse OS, both at Tp and Tp-3 (HR = 1.006/unit, p < 0.0001 and HR = 1.007/unit, p = 0.02, respectively). An ESR1 mutation was detected in 14/91 at Tp-3 (15%) and 28/91 at Tp (31%). ESR1 mutation detection was strongly correlated with OS both at Tp and Tp-3 (HR = 2.4, p = 0.0005 and HR = 1.97, p = 0.03, respectively). Between Tp-3 and Tp, overall median CA 15.3 and ESR1 mutation level increased (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.007, respectively) and were related to poorer OS (HR = 1.007/unit, p = 0.0002 and HR = 3.1, p = 0.05). In contrast, CfDNA was not correlated at all with clinical progression (36/91 increase, 36/91 decrease, and 19/91 stable cfDNA). ROC curve analysis identified a 59% CA 15.3 increase as the best cut-off for predicting progression, but with poor performance (AUC = 0.64). Multivariate analysis showed that CA 15.3 at Tp (HR = 1.0006/unit, p = 0.006), cfDNA at Tp (HR = 1.005/unit, p = 0.01), ESR1 detection at Tp (HR = 2.7, p = 0.0002) and CA 15.3 increase between Tp-3 and Tp (HR = 1.006/unit, p = 0.003) were associated with poor OS. Conclusions: All 3 biomarkers are correlated with OS in MBC treated with AI. CfDNA variation is poorly related to clinical progression while CA 15.3 variation or ESR1 mutation detection are much more reliable. Overall the better performance is observed with ESR1 mutation detection.

Background: Decrease of circulating tumor cells (CTC) during treatment is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We specifically evaluated the impact of CTC on brain metastasis outcome. Methods: HER2-positive MBC with brain metastasis not previously treated with whole-brain radiotherapy received firstline combination of lapatinib and capecitabine in a phase II study. CTC were detected at baseline and day 21 (CellSearch). Results: Median follow-up of the 44 analyzed patients was 21.2 months. The central nervous system objective response (CNS-OR) rate was 66%. At baseline, 20 of 41 assessable patients for CTC (49%) had ≥1 CTC (range 1–301, median 3) and 9 (22%) had ≥5 CTC. At day 21, 7 of 38 patients (18%) had ≥ 1C TC (P = 0.006, versus baseline), and CTC had disappeared in 11 patients. CNS-OR rate was significantly higher in patients with no CTC at day 21 [25 of 31 (80%) versus 2 of 7 (29%), P= 0.01]. The 1-year overall survival rate was 83.9% in patients with no CTC at day 21 versus 42.9% in patients with ≥ 1C TC (P= 0.02). Conclusions: This is the first report showing a correlation between CNS metastasis response, outcome and early CTC clearance under targeted treatment of HER2+ MBC. Clinical Trials number: NCT00967031.

Summary Background Brain metastases occur in 30–50% of patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. In the case of diffuse brain metastases, treatment is based on whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Few systemic options are available. We aimed to investigate the combination of lapatinib plus capecitabine for the treatment of previously untreated brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer. Methods In this single-arm phase 2, open-label, multicentre study, eligible patients had HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with brain metastases not previously treated with WBRT, capecitabine, or lapatinib. Tretament was given in 21 day cycles: patients received lapatinib (1250 mg, orally) every day and capecitabine (2000 mg/m 2 , orally) from day 1 to day 14. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with an objective CNS response, defined as a 50% or greater volumetric reduction of CNS lesions in the absence of increased steroid use, progressive neurological symptoms, and progressive extra-CNS disease. All responses had to be confirmed 4 weeks after initial response. Efficacy analyses included all patients who received the study drugs and were assessable for efficacy criteria. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00967031. Findings Between April 15, 2009, to Aug 2, 2010, we enrolled 45 patients, 44 (98%) of whom were assessable for efficacy, with a median follow-up of 21·2 months (range 2·2–27·6). 29 patients had an objective CNS response (65·9%, 95% CI 50·1–79·5); all were partial responses. Of all 45 treated patients, 22 (49%) had grade 3 or grade 4 treatment-related adverse events, of which the most common were diarrhoea in nine (20%) patients and hand-foot syndrome in nine (20%) patients. 14 (31%) patients had at least one severe adverse event; treatment was discontinued because of toxicity in four patients. No toxic deaths occurred. Interpretation The combination of lapatinib and capecitabine is active as first-line treatment of brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer. A phase 3 trial is warranted. Funding GlaxoSmithKline-France and UNICANCER.

// Florian Clatot 1,2,3 , Anne Perdrix 3,4 , Laetitia Augusto 1 , Ludivine Beaussire 3,5 , Julien Delacour 3,5 , Celine Calbrix 4 , David Sefrioui 3,5,6 , Pierre-Julien Viailly 2 , Michael Bubenheim 7 , Cristian Moldovan 1 , Cristina Alexandru 1 , Isabelle Tennevet 1 , Olivier Rigal 1 , Cecile Guillemet 1 , Marianne Leheurteur 1 , Sophie Gouerant 1 , Camille Petrau 1,3 , Jean-Christophe Thery 1,5 , Jean-Michel Picquenot 1,2,4 , Corinne Veyret 1 , Thierry Frebourg 5 , Fabrice Jardin 2 , Nasrin Sarafan-Vasseur 3,5,* and Frederic Di Fiore 1,3,5,6,* 1 Department of Medical Oncology, Henri Becquerel Centre, Rouen, France 2 INSERM U918, Henri Becquerel Centre, Rouen, France 3 EquIpe de Recherche en Oncologie, Rouen, France 4 Department of Biopathology, Henri Becquerel Centre, Rouen, France 5 INSERM U1079, Faculty of medecine, Rouen, France 6 Department of Gastroenterology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France 7 Department of Biostatistics, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France * These authors have contributed equally to the work Correspondence to: Florian Clatot, email: // Keywords : ESR1 mutation, digital PCR, breast cancer, aromatase inhibitor, kinetics Received : October 12, 2016 Accepted: October 24, 2016 Published: October 27, 2016 Abstract Purpose: To assess the prognostic and predictive value of circulating ESR1 mutation and its kinetics before and after progression on aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment. Patients and methods: ESR1 circulating D538G and Y537S/N/C mutations were retrospectively analyzed by digital droplet PCR after first-line AI failure in patients treated consecutively from 2010 to 2012 for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed according to circulating mutational status and subsequent lines of treatment. The kinetics of ESR1 mutation before (3 and 6 months) and after (3 months) AI progression were determined in the available archive plasmas. Results: Circulating ESR1 mutations were found at AI progression in 44/144 patients included (30.6%). Median follow-up from AI initiation was 40 months (range 4-94). The median OS was decreased in patients with circulating ESR1 mutation than in patients without mutation (15.5 versus 23.8 months, P =0.0006). The median PFS was also significantly decreased in patients with ESR1 mutation than in patients without mutation (5.9 vs 7 months, P =0.002). After AI failure, there was no difference in outcome for patients receiving chemotherapy (n = 58) versus non-AI endocrine therapy (n=51) in patients with and without ESR1 mutation. ESR1 circulating mutations were detectable in 75% of all cases before AI progression, whereas the kinetics 3 months after progression did not correlate with outcome. Conclusion: ESR1 circulating mutations are independent risk factors for poor outcome after AI failure, and are frequently detectable before clinical progression. Interventional studies based on ESR1 circulating status are warranted.

Background: Decrease of CTC level during treatment in MBC has been reported as an independent prognostic and predictive factor of patients’ outcome. Monitoring CTC in addition to clinical response criteria is currently evaluated in early clinical trials in various cancer types. We sought to evaluate the clinical interest of peripheral blood CTC for patients included in the LANDSCAPE study which assessed the efficacy of upfront systemic treatment with L+C for newly diagnosed brain metastasis. Methods: This analysis is a preplanned secondary endpoint of the LANDSCAPE study. Eligible pts had HER2+ MBC with BM not previously treated with WBR, C or L. Pts received L1250 mg/day and C2000 mg/m2/day, days 1–14, every 21 days. The primary endpoint was a centrally assessed CNS objective response (CNS-OR) defined as a ≥50% volumetric reduction of CNS lesions in the absence of increasing steroid use, progressive neurologic symptoms or progressive extra-CNS disease. CTC were detected in 7.5 ml of blood using the CellSearchSystem™, combining EpCAM immunomagnetic selection (IMS) followed by anti-cytokeratin (A45B/B3) fluorescently staining for CTC at baseline and at day (D) 21, before cycle 2. Results: From 04/2009 to 08/2010, 45 pts were enrolled, 41 were evaluable for CTC at baseline and 38 at D21. Median age was 56 (range 35 to 79). PS was >1 only in 2 pts. At baseline, 20/41 (48.8%) pts had ≥ 1CTC and 9 (22%) ≥ 5CTC (range 1–301, median 3). CTC were detected in pts with (18/37) or without disease outside SNC (2/6) (p=0.63). At a median follow-up of 10 months (range 2.9−16.5), median TTP was 6.0 months [95% CI 4.9; 7.4] vs. 4.3 [2.8; 5.9] months for pts without and with CTC at baseline respectively (p=0.14). After 21 days of treatment, a disappearance of CTC was observed in 11pts (31%). At D21, only 7 (18.4%) pts had ≥ 1CTC and 3 (8%) ≥ 5 CTC (p=0.006, D21 vs. baseline). In 43 evaluable pts, CNS-OR rate was 67% (95%CI 51–81), with a median time from inclusion to response of 1.8 month. Absence of CTC was not correlated with CNS-OR rate at baseline (17/21 (81%) vs. 11/19 (58%), NS). Strikingly, remaining positivity for CTC at D 21 (≥ 1CTC) was correlated with a poor response rate in CNS: 2/6 (33.3%) vs. 25/31 (80.6%) in pts with 0 CTC, p=0.03. Conclusions: Early decrease (at D 21) in CTC level is correlated with a high response rate in newly diagnosed BM to L + C and underlines the predictive value of this blood marker in MBC pts even for brain metastasis. Longer follow-up is needed to assess its prognostic value under antiHER2 targeted therapy. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-06-12.

Since the improvement of chemotherapy with safe molecules is needed for a better efficacy without supplementary toxicity, we investigated the feasibility and tolerability of the combination of docetaxel and curcumin, a polyphenolic derivative extracted from Curcuma longa root.Fourteen patients were accrued in this open-label phase I trial. At the last dose level of curcumin, three dose-limiting toxicities were observed and two out of three patients at this dose level refused to continue treatment, leading us to define the maximal tolerated dose of curcumin at 8,000 mg/d. Eight patients out of 14 had measurable lesions according to RECIST criteria, with five PR and three SD. Some improvements as biological and clinical responses were observed in most patients.Patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer were eligible. Docetaxel (100 mg/m(2)) was administered as a 1 h i.v. infusion every 3 w on d 1 for six cycles. Curcumin was orally given from 500 mg/d for seven consecutive d by cycle (from d-4 to d+2) and escalated until a dose-limiting toxicity should occur. The primary endpoint of this study was to determine the maximal tolerated dose of the combination of dose-escalating curcumin and standard dose of docetaxel chemotherapy in advanced and metastatic breast cancer patients. Secondary objectives included toxicity, safety, vascular endothelial growth factor and tumor markers measurements and assessment of objective and clinical responses to the combination therapy.The recommended dose of curcumin is 6,000 mg/d for seven consecutive d every 3 w in combination with a standard dose of docetaxel. From the encouraging efficacy results, a comparative phase II trial of this regimen plus docetaxel versus docetaxel alone is ongoing in advanced and metastatic breast cancer patients.

Purpose: Several factors have been shown to correlate with prognosis of patients with breast carcinoma. Among the most useful are node involvement, tumor size, and pathologic grade. These factors retained their prognostic value when assessed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Previously we used a revised Nottingham prognostic index and defined 3 related indices (breast grading index, modified Nottingham prognostic index, and modified breast grading index) that were also significantly related to overall survival and disease-free survival. To assess the postchemotherapy risk globally, we have combined the 3 pathologic factors to design a specific classification to evaluate residual disease. This new classification includes 4 risk levels (levels 1-4) according to residual disease magnitude after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 710 patients with operable breast cancer. Results: This classification resulted in significantly different results for overall survival (P < 10 -7 ) and disease-free survival (P = 8.3 X 10- 7 ). Conclusion: This classification should help us in the selection of subgroups of patients for further adjuvant treatment.

We aimed to compare the complication rate between port catheters (PC) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) for the administration of postoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer. All patients treated from January 2010 to August 2012 at the Centre Henri Becquerel for early breast cancer requiring postoperative chemotherapy were retrospectively screened. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a major complication related to the central venous catheter. Major complications were defined as any grade 3 event according to CTCAE 4.0, delay in chemotherapy >7 days, change of the device, life-threatening event, event requiring a hospitalization, or a prolongation of hospitalization. A total of 448 patients were included; 290 had a PC and 158 a PICC. Overall, 31 major complications related to the central venous catheter were observed: 13 for patients with a PC (4.5 %) and 18 for patients with a PICC (11.4 %). In univariate analysis, having a PICC was the only factor significantly associated with a higher risk of major complications (HR = 2.83, p = 0.0027). We observed a trend for a higher risk of major complications for patients older than 60 years or with BMI >25 (p = 0.06). In multivariate analysis, having a PICC was the only predictive factor of major complications (HR = 2.89, p = 0.004). In univariate and multivariate analysis, having a PICC instead of a PC was the only predictive factor of device-related major complication. If confirmed prospectively by the NCT02095743 ongoing trial, this result might modify the management of adjuvant chemotherapy administration.

Background The objective of this phase II study was to attempt to maximize response and survival in patients with bulky, operable breast cancer by combining sequential neoadjuvant docetaxel to a semi-intensive anthracycline- based regimen. Patients and Methods Eligible patients (N = 53) were included to receive 4 cycles of docetaxel, followed by a maximum of 4 cycles of TNCF (THP [theprubican]—doxorubicin/vinorelbine/cyclophosphamide/5-fluorouracil) every 21 days before definitive surgery and radiation therapy. Results After a median number of 4 cycles of docetaxel and 2 cycles of TNCF, the overall clinical response rate was 81.1%, including a 13.2% complete remission rate and only 2 incidences of progressive disease. Breast conservation was achieved in 87% of patients. According to Chevallier classification, a pathologic complete response in breast and axilla was confirmed in 6 patients (11.3%) and in 9 patients (17%) using the Sataloff's classification. The important myelosuppression observed in this trial was expected but limited by the prophylactic use of growth factors. After a median follow-up of 40.4 months, only 5 recurrences were documented, with a median time to first recurrence of 12.8 months. Conclusion Despite disappointing results of this trial for pathologic complete response rate, possibly because of the order of drug administration, clinical response, breast conservation, and survival were optimized.

Summary The clinical benefits of endocrine therapy for patients with hormonosensitive breast cancer are well established. For many years, five years’ treatment with tamoxifen was the gold standard of adjuvant treatment. The recent development of new endocrine agents provides physicians with the opportunity to take a more effective therapeutic approach. Nevertheless, the success of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy is much more recent and less frequently reported in the literature. This article reviews the studies published on neoadjuvant endocrine treatment (tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors). According to the literature, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy seems to be effective and well tolerated. The newer generation of aromatase inhibitors (letrozole, anastrozole, exemestane) appear to result in better overall response rates and more conservative surgery than tamoxifen. Patients with an ER Allred score of 6 and over are most likely to respond and gain clinical benefit. The optimal duration of neoadjuvant therapy has not yet been investigated in detail. These preliminary results are interesting and should be confirmed by further studies.

Acquired estrogen receptor gene (ESR1) mutations have been recently reported as a marker of resistance to aromatase inhibitors in hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer. We retrospectively considered seven patients treated for metastatic breast cancer with available samples from the primary tumor before any treatment, cryopreserved metastasis removed during progression and concomitant plasmas. All these seven patients were in disease progression after previous exposure to aromatase inhibitors for at least 6 months, and were assessed for ESR1 mutations detection in tumor and circulating DNA. For these patients, Sanger sequencing identified four metastases with clear ESR1 mutation and one possible, whereas digital PCR identified six mutated metastases. Then, under blind conditions and using digital PCR, corresponding circulating ESR1 mutations were successfully detected in four of these six metastatic breast cancer patients. Moreover, in two patients with serial blood samples following treatments exposure, the monitoring of circulating ESR1 mutations clearly predicted disease evolution. In the context of high interest for ESR1 mutations, our results highlight that these acquired recurrent mutations may be tracked in circulating tumor DNA and may be of clinical relevance for metastatic breast cancer patient monitoring.

1052 Background: For HR+/HER2– metastatic breast cancer (mBC), International guidelines recommend multiple lines of endocrine therapy (ET) before starting chemotherapy. Few studies have assessed the efficacy of such strategy on large populations. Our objective was to evaluate multiple ET activity according to clinical and biological characteristics and type of ET. Methods: All patients (pts) who initiated treatment for a newly diagnosed mBC between January 2008 and December 2014 in all 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers were included in the real life ESME database. ESME collects retrospective data using a clinical trial-like methodology. Database lock was 8 Dec 2016. Primary endpoint of the current study was progression free survival (PFS) on successive ET lines. Only pts with ET alone were assessed (pts receiving ET after chemotherapy as maintenance therapy, or combined with targeted treatment were excluded). Results: 9921 pts out of 16703 in ESME, had HR+/HER2- mBC (median age 62.0 years[range 23-96]). 53.9% of pts had visceral and 80.1% non visceral disease at diagnosis. Median OS of HR+/HER2- pts was 42.15 months (95% CI, 40.93-43.27). As first-line therapy, 4123 pts (41.6%) received ET alone, while 2038 received chemotherapy alone (20.5%) and 3667 received both (37%). Median PFS for first-line ET (N=4123) was 11.3 months (95% CI, 10.6-11.9). Only 668 pts (16%) received subsequent lines of ET alone. Types of ET used are described in the table below. Successive PFS will be reported at the meeting. Conclusions: Those data show that ET is prescribed to less than 50% of patients with HR+/HER2- mBC in first line and only to a small minority in subsequent lines. This is not in line with existing guidelines (NCCN, ABC3). Real-life median PFS for first-line ET is consistent with median PFS reported in clinical trials (Nabholtz, 2000). [Table: see text]

Few data are published on docetaxel toxicity in obese patients.All obese patients (n=100) treated for early breast cancer during three consecutive years at our Institution, were retrospectively investigated. The same number of non-obese patients was randomly selected and used as controls. We assessed the factors predictive of the relative dose intesity (RDI) reduction, including body composition.A total of 18% (n=18) of obese patients and 5% (n=5) of non-obese patients required reduction of docetaxel RDI due to toxicity (p=0.008). In a multivariate analysis, body mass index (BMI) and age were predictive of a reduction in RDI. Among the 89 patients with a determination of body composition, patients with a higher fat mass more frequently had a reduction in docetaxel RDI (p=0.002). In multivariate analysis, fat mass was the only independent factor predictive of a reduction in docetaxel RDI.Obese patients treated for early breast cancer more frequently required a reduction in docetaxel RDI. Fat mass seems to be the best factor predictive of a reduction in docetaxel RDI.

This retrospective study analyzed, in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), overall survival (OS) related to each subsequent line of chemotherapy (CT). We evaluated 578 patients with a MBC. Among these patients, 558 patients were stratified according to the number of differents CT lines received. Median OS decreased from 22.5 to 12.3 months. Nevertheless, survival was rather stable for subsequent lines after the third line of CT around 8 months. In our study, it appeared useful to give several CT lines when possible. Subsequent lines of CT could have a beneficial effect on the survival for some patients with MBC.

Pathologic complete response (pCR) is linked to a better outcome, but its definition varies among working groups. We performed this study to validate different expressions of pCR as well as to determine the role of in situ and isolated tumor cell residues. A pathologic review was conducted on 710 operable patients with breast cancer to assess the residual disease in breast and in nodes according to the Chevallier (Ch) and Sataloff's (Sa) classifications. The pCR rate was 14.3% according to the Chevallier and 25.8% according to the Sataloff's classification. Overall survival and disease-free survival have been compared according to the pathologic response. There were significant differences between the pCR Ch(1+2) or Sa(A) and the non-pCR group. No significant difference was found between classes Ch(1) versus Ch(2) and between class Sa(A) without isolated cells versus class Sa(A) with isolated cells. Conversely, tumors histologically modified by chemotherapy were associated with a better prognosis than unmodified tumors. Finally, evidence of pCR in nodes was associated with a better prognosis. pCR should be defined as an absence of node invasion, and in the breast, either absence of tumor or tumor residue less than 5% of the tumor.

Recent trials of induction chemotherapy in bulky operable breast cancer have shown much higher pathological complete response (pCR) rates with trastuzumab-driven combinations. However, it is useful to take into account the specific chemosensitivity of HER-2–positive tumors. The aim of this study was to assess the pCR rate according to HER-2 status in response to chemotherapy, without an anti–HER-2 specific biological agent, in 710 operable breast cancer patients. Since 1982, these patients have been treated with several different neoadjuvant chemotherapy combinations. During this period, HER-2 overexpression was most often not assessed. Subsequently, we assessed HER-2 expression using archival paraffin-embedded tissue. A technically usable specimen was available for 413 of the 710 patients. Before treatment, 51 patients were HER-2 positive, 287 patients were HER-2 negative, and the results were inconclusive for 75 patients. Of these patients, a pCR in breast and nodes was obtained in 94 patients (14.3%), but this event was threefold more frequent for HER-2–positive patients (23.5%) than for HER-2–negative patients (7%). The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates at 10 years were 66.6% and 57.4%, respectively. The DFS rate was, as expected, better for HER-2–negative patients, with HER-2 status assessed before as well as after chemotherapy. A significant difference was found for OS in favor of HER-2–negative patients only with postchemotherapy assessment of HER-2, a fact similar to our previous findings. Finally, there was a tendency toward a higher DFS rate for HER-2–positive patients who achieved a pCR compared with HER-2–positive patients who did not.

International audience

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy and the second most common cause of cancer-related death in women. Endocrine therapy has been used for more than a century to treat advanced-stage breast cancer. The results obtained with the third-generation aromatase inhibitor letrozole demonstrated an actual improvement in patient outcome compared with tamoxifen. This benefit translates into disease-free survival improvement for adjuvant treatment and overall survival in patients with metastatic disease. The present clinical situation of hormonal therapy is stable; however, recently, new anticancer agents (temsirolimus and everolimus) that inhibit mammalian target of rapamycin protein kinase have been developed and seem to be very promising because of their synergistic activity with letrozole. The phase II study of a combination of temsirolimus or everolimus with letrozole demonstrated a better progression-free survival in the combination arm than in the letrozole alone arm. Consequently, the results of ongoing phase III studies are eagerly awaited.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer corresponds to the use of a systemic treatment applied before loco-regional treatment (surgery and/or radiotherapy). Initiated in the seventies for treatment of the locally advanced and/or inflammatory breast cancers, induction chemotherapy has been extended in the beginning of eighties for cancers known as operable (size higher than 3 cm and/or in central position) in order to allow a more frequent conservating surgery. This objective is obtained in 75% of the cases approximately without increase in the risk of local relapse and without noxious effect on overall survival, in spite of the delay of the loco-regional treatment. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy progressively moved with the advent of major drugs in breast cancer which are anthracyclins, vinorelbine and taxans. But to date, no protocol was essential like an uncontested standard. However, it seems that obtaining a complete clinical response is the best guarantor to avoid relapse. That seems to be observed only after 6 cycles, even 8 cycles of chemotherapy, each cycle combining the 2 major drugs for the treatment of breast cancer of which are anthracyclins and taxanes employed according a sequential scheme after a based-anthracyclins treatment, except any cardiac contra-indication. Moreover, the use of targeted therapeuticals like Herceptin, with a chemotherapy, seems to be promising and should be more studied. Finally, when a neoadjuvant chemotherapy is administered, the evaluation of the pre-treatment biopsy helps to establish key patient-management parameters such as tumour type, SBR grade and immunohistochemical parameters. This evaluation provides predictive parameters with regards to drug response (hormonal status, overexpression of Her2). The further studies realised in this way will permit to improve the results yet obtained.

Aim: Adjuvant chemotherapy is indicated for patients treated for early breast cancer with poor prognostic factors. Central venous device is required for this administration. Both Port catheter and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICC) are routinely used even if no comparison between these devices is available in this setting. Methods: All patients treated from January 2010 to August 2012 at the Centre Henri Becquerel for an early breast cancer requiring a post-operative chemotherapy (6 FEC or 3 FEC + 3 TXT) were retrospectively screened. Patients with a Her2 overexpression were excluded. The type of central venous device (port or PICC), age, BMI, type of surgery or node exploration, chemotherapy regimen and complications induced by central venous catheter were collected. The primary endpoint was the probability of occurrence of a major complication related to the central venous device. Majors complications were defined as: any grade 3 event according to CTCAE 4.0, delay in chemotherapy >7 days, change of the device, life-threatening event, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization. Analysis was performed by a Kaplan-Meier and a Cox model. Results: 448 patients were included: 290 (65%) had a port and 158 (35%) a PICC. Among the 448 patients, 31 (6.9%) had at least one major complication related to the device: 13 for patients with a port (4.5%) and 18 for patients with a PICC (11.4%). The most frequent complication was a thromboembolic event. In univariate analysis, having a PICC was the only factor significantly associated with a higher risk of complications (HR = 2.83, p = 0.0027). There was a trend for more complications for patients with a BMI > 25 (HR = 2.04, p = 0.056) or older than 60 years (HR = 1.95, p = 0.057). In multivariate analysis, having a PICC was the only predictive factor of complications (HR = 2.89, p = 0.0036). Conclusions: In univariate and multivariate analysis, having a PICC instead of a port as central venous device was the only predictive factor of device related major complication. If confirmed prospectively by the NCT02095743 ongoing trial, this result may modify the management of adjuvant chemotherapy administration. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

2054 Background: BM, the most frequent malignancy in the central nervous system, remains of poor prognosis. Standard treatment is WBRT. Neo-angiogenesis plays an important role in BM growth. Angiog...